[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Kobe bryant dressed in a usa jersey takes on 2 defenders."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Kobe bryant plays basketball in the olympics." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Wearing a USA jersey does not necessarily imply that it is in the Olympics. Kobe Bryant cannot necessarily be assumed to be playing basketball. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "Usa basketball player dribbling to the basket protecting the ball from the opposition." that "Player throws ball out of bounds in anger."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A player protecting the ball would not throw the ball out of bounds in anger. Final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "Three young women smiling for a photo." is it true that "The women are in a photo booth."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Not everyone who smiles for a photo is in a photo booth. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Many people sit at a long dinner table at a formal event." can we conclude that "People are sitting at a table at the gathering."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] People can be encompassed within many people and a formal event is specific type of gathering. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Two dogs run through grass near a body of water." can we conclude that "The dogs are retrieving a downed bird."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Not all dogs who run through grass near a body of water are retrieving a downed bird.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A group of men in white lab coats watching something burn."\nHypothesis: "Women are working in a lab."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Men and women are different genders. Lab cannot refer to both a kind of clothing and a place. Watching and working are two different adverbs. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Two asian ladies walking by a store with an american flag on the outside wall."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two woman walking outside." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Two asian ladies walking by a store with an american flag on the outside wall which is always outside.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A kid is running after an airborne soccer ball during a game in a sunny field."\nHypothesis: "There is a child running after a ball."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A child can also be called a kid and the ball his is running after is an airborne soccer ball.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A group of runners run through the park in the winter." can we conclude that "A collection of people are exercising."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A group of runners can be considered a collection of people and one way to exercise is to run. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "Children play soccer as adults look on." is it true that "Adults and children are near a soccer ball."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Children and adults would be near a soccer ball if children are playing with it and the adults are looking on. Final answer: yes.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "A male and a female sitting in a living room playing jenga." that "Tall humans sitting."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Not every male and female that is playing Jenga is tall.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A man and woman are sitting at a table with a jenga game in front of them and a few beer bottles."\nHypothesis: "Two people play play jenga."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Two people play play Jenga implies a man and woman in front of them and a few beer bottles. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A dog on two feet wearing a pink sweater."\nHypothesis: "A dog on four legs wearing no clothes."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The dog cannot be on four legs and two feet at the same time. If the dog has on a pink sweater it has to have on clothes.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A black dog in a pink sweater is up on his hind legs in front of a pink blanket."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A black dog is wearing a sweater." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A black dog is wearing a sweater which is pink one.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "Young girl in a dress crying." that "The young girl is laughing at her dress."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The girl in the dress is crying not laughing at her dress. Final answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A little girl in a pink and yellow plaid dress is crying with her arms crossed in front of her."\nHypothesis: "The girl is crying because she was told she couldn't have candy."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A girl crying is not assumed to be doing so because she was told she couldn't have candy. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A asian male wearing a red shirt is sitting next to a grocery stand selling fruits."\nHypothesis: "Man with fresh fruit stand talking to customers."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Just because male wearing a red shirt is sitting next to a grocery doesn't mean he is with fresh fruit stand talking to customers.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "A young african woman stands on a beach holding up an octopus on a string." does that mean that "A young african woman holds up a octopus on a string at night."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Holding up an octopus does not imply that it is night. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "Two people wearing brightly colored protective headgear are in a swimming pool with very choppy water and the person in the foreground has a hand on a yellow and blue ball which is approximately the size of a basketball." does that mean that "The swimmers are in very choppy water and are in danger of drowning even though one has a huge hand."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Not all hands are huge and swimming in a pool with choppy water does not imply being in danger of drowning. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Delicious barbecue had been prepared by a group of chef." can we conclude that "The chef had prepared barbecue for the event."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Prepared by a chef does not imply it is for an event.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A man and a woman are sitting on a couch next to other people behind a table full of papers."\nHypothesis: "Two accountants sitting in the break room during a hectic day."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Sitting on a couch does not imply sitting in a break room or that it is a hectic day. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A group of young men are about to play soccer on a sandy plain."\nHypothesis: "A group of young men are standing on a sandy plain."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Men about to play on a sandy plain are standing on a sandy plain. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A few people are waving flags in a crowd." is it true that "People are waving flags."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] People waving flags refers to few people waving flags in a crowd. Final answer: yes.


[User]
Leo: If "Young men wave flags in a crowd outside of a glassy building." does that mean that "There are many men in this picture."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
If there are men in a crowd then there are many men.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Two men standing near a dog." is it true that "The men are taller than the dog."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] If two men are standing near a dog means the men should be taller than the dog as a man standing is taller than dog. So the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A brown and black dog is running along a grassy path wearing a red jacket." is it true that "The dogs are outside."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A dog that is running might be running with other dogs. A grassy path is outside.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Premise: "Brown and black dog with red and white jacket run on road in rural area."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A dog follows a car driven by its owner." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The dog may not be brown and black. It could be white. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Guy playing college basketball." can we conclude that "The girl is dribbling the ball."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A guy can't be playing basketball if the girl currently is.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A dog with a reflective garmet running down a rural road."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "An animal is running in open country down the marked path with a bright shirt on." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A dog is an animal. A bright shirt is a kind of reflective garment. A rural road could be a marked path in open country.
The answer: yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A girl is jumping in the air."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The girl's feet aren't touching the ground." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A girl jumping in the air means her feet aren't touching the ground. So the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A woman in a sleeveless shirt grins in the direction of the man in the adjoining plush bus seat." is it true that "There are people in a bus."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A plush bus seat would have to be in a bus.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A girl is playing in a house between a window and a stack of shelves."\nHypothesis: "There is a girl playing inside a house."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Playing inside a house is a rephrasing of playing in a house. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "The young couple share a humorous joke while traveling on the coach bus."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The couple are in a relationship with each other." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The young couple is a couple and they being sharing a humorous joke while traveling on the coach bus means in a relationship with each other.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man looking through a microscope and manipulating the contents of the slide." that "The man is a scientist."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Not every man who looks through a microscope is a scientist.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A man with a dark blue jacket and brown pants stands beside another man in front of a building." does that mean that "A man and a woman stand next to each other in front of a building."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A man and woman is not a man and a man. So, the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man wearing carpenters pants and a green hooded sweatshirt walks down the street."\nHypothesis: "A boy kisses a girl."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A boy kisses a girl can't be one man walking down the street. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A man in a black outfit loading bags of product."\nHypothesis: "The man is near the bags of product."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A man in a black outfit loading bags of product means the man should be near the bags of product.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A man with two fireworks in his hands while a woman in a red cap with an arrow through her head stands to his right."\nHypothesis: "A man and woman are sitting in the grass having a picnic."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
If the man and woman are having a picnic the man would not have fireworks and the woman couldn't be standing with an arrow through her head.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A two girl band entertains at this venue."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The lead singer plays electric guitar and the other band member sings backup and plays keyboards." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The two girls have been playing music together for their whole lives.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A black and white dog playing in the snow together." is it true that "The dogs' feet are cold."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Dogs typically do not wear shoes hence their feet are cold if they are in snow. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Black dog jumping over a white dog in a snowy path."\nHypothesis: "A calendar is seen on the wall."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A dog has nothing to do with a calendar. They are totally irrelevant to one another. So the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A black poodle jumping on the head of a white poodle while walking in the snow." that "The dog is driving a car."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Either the poodle is jumping while walking or it is driving. It cannot do more than one thing at a time. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A group of people holding bags are standing in line for a train." is it true that "People are at the bus stop."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Either people are standing for a train (which would be underground) or at the bus stop (which would be above ground). They cannot do both simultaneously.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Given the sentence "A pug dog is standing up on two legs looking over a stone wall." can we conclude that "A pug dog is standing up looking for its owner."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A dog standing on two legs looking over a wall is not necessarily looking for its owner. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two older men in gray jackets."\nHypothesis: "The women are wearing grey."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Men refers to multiple males where women refers to multiple females. They cannot be one and the same. So the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Two men are having a conversation at a meeting."\nHypothesis: "Everybody is silent."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Everybody usually does not refer to only two beings. Either the group are having a conversation or they are silent. They cannot do both simultaneously. Final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "Two men in a classroom in front of a white screen."\nHypothesis: "The men are presenting something."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Presenting something is not the only reason you would be at the front of a screen.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two elderly men standing in front of a projector pull-down screen."\nHypothesis: "Two professors teach a college class."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Elderly men does not imply the men are professors and standing in front of a screen doesn't mean that they teach a college class. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man in a plaza stares at a woman with see through pants."\nHypothesis: "A man who works in a plaza looks at a lady."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A man in a plaza does not necessarily work in that plaza. Not all ladies wear see through pants. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A man in black squatting with people walking across the streets." does that mean that "Man looking for his keys."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A Man in black squatting with people walking across the streets is not necessarily looking for his keys. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A black and white cat looking at a baby." is it true that "The baby looks at the cat."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] It can either be the baby looks or the cat looking. So the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A little boy with brown curly hair is blowing bubbles with a wand held by a girl."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Boy and girl play." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Blowing bubbles with a wand is something a boy and girl do to play. Final answer: yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A person lays down on the street with his shoes off."\nHypothesis: "Someone is sleeping beside the road while barefoot."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A person laying down on the street is not assumed to be sleeping beside the road.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "There is a man laying on the ground with a red and white hat on his head."\nHypothesis: "A homeless man is sleeping."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] There is a man laying on the ground with a red and white hat on his head does not indicate that a homeless man is sleeping. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: If "Two basketball teams playing a small game watching a ball as it flies towards the goal." does that mean that "The two teams play each other."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Basketball is a type of game that has teams. They are playing against each other. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "An abstract sand sculpture on a beach with a woman in the background." can we conclude that "A woman made a sand castle."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A sand sculpture does not imply that a woman made a sand castle. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A sand sculpture with a woman running on the beach behind it." does that mean that "A woman swims in the pool."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A woman who swims in the pool can't be running on the beach at the same time. So, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A woman travels by a large octopus sand sculpture on the beach."\nHypothesis: "A woman sweeps the floor."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A woman who travels by a sand sculpture on the beach can't be sweeping the floor as a beach has no floor.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A dog wearing a red saddle is running across a field with low grass and trees nearby."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A dog sits on a bench." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A dog who sits on a bench can not simultaneously be running across a field.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "A dog with long hair and a red vest runs in the grass." that "The cat eats sand."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A dog can not be a cat while an animal eats sand can not happen if an animal runs in the grass. So the final answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A tan dog wearing a red shirt runs through the grass."\nHypothesis: "A dog is runnig through the grass wearing a red shirt."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A dog is still a tan dog. They are saying the color so it is implied that it is a dog. So the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A dog in a red jacket is running on the grass." that "A dog is chasing after a ball."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Running on the grass does not necessarily mean chasing after a ball. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "The dog in the red vest runs in the field."\nHypothesis: "The dog is run in the ground."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Runs in the field does not necessarily mean run in the ground. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "Two men and a dog are playing with a ball in the water." does that mean that "3 animals in the water."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Men can be considered animals. Two men and a dog make three. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A girl in a blue shirt and yellow shorts is jumping in the air and yelling into a microphone on a stage."\nHypothesis: "A girls jumps and yells into a microphone."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A girl who is jumping and yelling into microphone does just that.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A talent show person jumping and singing." that "A man takes the lead in the talent show."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A person jumping and singing does not imply that the man takes the lead in the talent show. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A crowd of people is walking through a parking lot at night." that "A crowd of people walk through a parking lot."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A crowd of people is walking through a parking lot at night requires that a crowd of people is walking through a parking lot. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Premise: "A gray-haired man washing windows on a building."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The old guy washes windows." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] An old guy typically has gray hair and is the man washing the windows. The answer is yes.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A woman in a field enjoys her clothing being blown by the wind." that "Someone is standing in a windy field."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A woman enjoying her clothing being blown by the wind is not assumed to be standing. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A old man washing the windows of city lights books."\nHypothesis: "There is an old man."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
There has to be an old man there to have an old man washing the windows.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A window washer is cleaning the bookstore windows."\nHypothesis: "There is a man cleaning windows."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Just because A window washer is cleaning the bookstore windows doesn't mean he is a man. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Three people seated on a subway." is it true that "Three people are taking the subway to work."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Being seated on the subway does not imply going o work.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A sitting woman is laughing beside a man in a blue jacket."\nHypothesis: "A man told a woman a joke."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A woman laughing does not imply a joke as been told. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A woman carrying a handbag is on a blue scooter." is it true that "A woman is carrying her handbag."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The fact that a woman carrying a handbag is on a blue scooter does not imply that a woman is carrying her handbag. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A woman in a black shirt has her arm around a woman in a red shirt."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "One women is conforting an upset woman." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Having an arm around a woman does not imply the woman is upset. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Band members playing with the drum major lifting up his drums to attack another member."\nHypothesis: "The drum major is a woman."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] His refers to the drum major being a male. The drum major is either a man or a woman. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "People dressed in pants walking through a large building."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The people are heading to a meeting." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Not all people dressed in pants are heading to a meeting. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "The man and woman are sitting by the boats."\nHypothesis: "The man is near a boat."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A man could be sitting by the boats with a woman. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A man and a woman are sitting on the ground and surrounded by boats." is it true that "Both the man and woman are enjoying watching the boats around them."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Not all people surrounded by boats are enjoying watching the boats.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A blond woman in a white tank top and sunglasses is talking to a man sitting next to boats on a rock surface."\nHypothesis: "A woman spoke to her lover."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A woman can talk to a man without him being her lover.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A person holding a large bunch of colorful balloons jumps in the snow."\nHypothesis: "The person is inside the house blowing up balloons."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A person holding a large bunch of colorful balloons cannot jumps in the snow while inside the house.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "A child is outside flying with a lot of balloons in his hands."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The balloons are not floating." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Sentence 1 does not mention the state of the balloons. Sentence 2 adds the information that the ballons are not floating. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A person in pink water goggles is blowing bubbles underwater." that "A person in water goggles is just learning how to swim."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A person who is underwater is not necessarily learning how to swim.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Three young boys are jumping and playing in the hay."\nHypothesis: "Jumping is the part of playing."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Jumping and playing does not necessarily mean that jumping is part of the playing. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A waterskier flies into the air."\nHypothesis: "A waterskier has crashed into the water."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A waterskier cannot be fly into the air while crashed into the water. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A waterskier flying slighty in the air over a wave." can we conclude that "A waterskier is going over a wave."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Flying over a wave can also be mentioned as going over a wave. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "A person painting a railing." that "A person cleans the stairs."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A person cannot be painting a railing and cleans the stairs simultaneously.
The answer: no.


[User]
Premise: "A dog swimming with a stick in its mouth."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A dog is swimming with a stick." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A dog could only be swimming with a stick if the stick is in its mouth. The answer is yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "Dog swimming in the water with a stick in its mouth." can we conclude that "The dog is sleeping in the dog house."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Dog cannot be swimming in the water with a stick in its mouth while sleeping in the dog house. The answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A dog swimming though water holding a stick."\nHypothesis: "A dog is swimming while holding onto a stick in his mouth to bring it back to its owner."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A dog holding a stick will not always bring it back to its owner. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A dog swims holding a large stick in his mouth in front of a city skyline."\nHypothesis: "The dog is running with a large stick in his mouth."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A dog can't swims and be running at the same time. So, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A dog swimming along the ocean with a bark in its mouth." that "A dog swimming back to shore."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A dog that is swimming does not always swim back to shore. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A little girl in pink is holding up her pointer finger and pinkie finger in the air while holding her sunglasses in the other hand."\nHypothesis: "A little girl makes a hand gesture."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Holding up her pointer finger and pinkie finger in the air is a form of a hand gesture. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A young blond girl in pink shirt and pigtails is sitting atop a man's shoulders in a crowd."\nHypothesis: "A man is holding a little girl on his shoulders."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Young blond girl describes the little girl sitting on the man's shoulders.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A girl in pink is on the shoulders of a mustached man." that "The girl covers the man's eyes with her hand."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The girl could just be sitting there and her hands may not be anywhere near the man's eyes. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A blond girl with braids taking pictures in a crowd."\nHypothesis: "The girl stands alone on a street corner."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The girl cannot be in a crowd and alone at the same time. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "A young girl is on the shoulders of a man." that "A man sits on the shoulders of a little girl."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A girl cannot sit on a man's shoulder while a man sits on the girl's shoulder.
The answer: no.


[User]
Leo: If "Three people in reflective clothing riding bikes." does that mean that "Three people are rowing a boat."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
People cannot be riding bikes and be rowing a boat at the same time.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "An individual dressed in a blue top and red ""spongebob"" shorts with a handful of papers looks surprised while being photographed."\nHypothesis: "A man wearing a business suit is having his picture taken."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The man cannot be wearing a blue top and red shorts and be wearing a business suit. So the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A man in a green jacket is playing a game to win a prize."\nHypothesis: "The man was cold because he didn't have a coat."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The man can not get cold while in a green jacket. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Several men in silver suits are riding bicycles across a street."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The men are part of a street entertainment group." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Not all men in silver suits riding bicycles across a street are in street entertainment group. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "Four women wearing energizer bunny ears point to an attraction." does that mean that "Four sad women wearing energizer bunny ears point to an attraction."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Just because Four women wearing energizer bunny ears point to an attraction doesn't mean they are sad. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "There are 4 women wearing pink energizer bunny ears."\nHypothesis: "Women are wearing hazmat suits as they clean up radioactive waste."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Women cannot be wearing hazmat suits and wearing pink Energizer bunny ears simultaneously. The answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "Women wearing bunny ears and race numbers point at something in the distance." does that mean that "Some women racers wearing bunny ears are pointing at the finish line."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] People at a race may be pointing at something other than the finish line. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "Dog with muzzle and sweater marked 5 runs on dirt track." that "Dog with a sweater marked 5 runs on the track."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Dog with a muzzle and sweater marked 5 runs on the track.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A male is on a swing as four other people stand to the side of him." is it true that "A male is on a swing as four other people are in close proximity of him."?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Stand to the side of him implies in close proximity of him. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A boy catches a fish in a small stream as a girl points."\nHypothesis: "A boy and a girl at a small stream."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A boy engaging in activity where a girl points are together as a boy and a girl. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Three people looking at something in the snow near a tree." is it true that "The three people are on a roller coaster."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The people wouldn't be looking at things in snow near a tree from a roller coaster. So the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "Workers in hard hats at a railroad tracks construction site." that "Some people are performing construction."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Workers in hard hats at construction site implies that they are performing construction at the site.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "Street vendors sell baked goods."\nHypothesis: "The street vendors are not selling any food items."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] If the vendors are selling baked goods then they are selling food items. Final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A group of construction workers going down a flight of stairs."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Men and women walked down the stairs." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The group of constructions workers doesn't necessarily consist of both men and women. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A girl is in midair while doing an elaborate trick on a skateboard."\nHypothesis: "A girl sits next to her skateboard."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] One can not be in midair and sit at the same time. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A girl is jumping on her skateboard above a cement pavement."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A crowd watches as a girl does tricks on her skateboard." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A crowd does not always watch while girl is jumping on her skateboard.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A young woman is leaping in midair on a skateboard." that "The skateboard is broken."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
If ones skateboard is broken then one can not be leaping on it.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Man in sunglasses and cap walking."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man is running." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A man that is walking cannot be running at the same time.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "An old man with a blue hat and sunglasses stands by a chain link fence."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man reading a newspaper." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A man reading a newspaper can be standing near a chain link fence and can have on a blue hat and be wearing sunglasses. Final answer: no.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "This girl has got some skills and is showing them off by playing with fire!." is it true that "The girl is swinging her hips with a flaming hoola hoop."?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The girl could be doing anything with fire but she is specifically swinging her hips with a flaming hoola hoop. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A man and his dog riding the surf at the beach."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man and his dog are riding surf boards." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
They could be body surfing but they are riding surf boards.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man is surfing the waves with a dog."\nHypothesis: "A man is teaching his dog how to surf."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The man is surfing the waves with a dog but that doesn't necessarily mean that it is his dog and he is not necessarily teaching the dog how to surf.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A dog chasing livestock on sand." that "The bvoy was dressed as a cowboy."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A dog chasing livestock does not imply a bvoy dressed as a cowboy. The answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Little boy in green tube smilling with his hair sticking up he has on a black and blue striped shirt and tennis shoes."\nHypothesis: "The boy is stuck in a well."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A little boy cannot be in both a green tube and a well.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A short brown and white dog chasing sheep."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The cheep is in a field of grass." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The dog is chasing sheep but not necessarily in a field of grass. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "The surfer is surfing the wave."\nHypothesis: "The surfer is wearing a black wet suit."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The surfer is surfing the wave but he is not necessarily wearing a black wet suit. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "The surfer wearing the blue suit on the colorful surfboard is catching a wave."\nHypothesis: "The surfer is doing a trick."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The surfer is catching a wave but is not necessarily doing a trick.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A person in a dark wetsuit is surfing."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A person in a dark wetsuit with green stripes surfing." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A dark wetsuit isn't necessarily a dark wetsuit with green stripes.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two people are standing along a small canal on a dimly light street."\nHypothesis: "Two people are waiting for a boat."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
People standing by a canal does not always mean they are waiting for a boat.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Two men are having a conversation next to a canal at night." is it true that "Two men are having an argument next to a canal."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The men having a conversation may not be having an argument. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man and boy standing next to a scooter."\nHypothesis: "They are riding the scooter."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A man and a boy cannot stand next to a scooter and be riding it at the same time. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A blond man in a black shirt and shorts sitting at a table eating with a glass of wine."\nHypothesis: "A man is at a picnic being ignored by the other people there."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A man sitting at a table alone doen't mean he is being ignored. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man in a blue speedo holding swim goggles." that "A man shopping for groceries."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A man cannot be wearing a blue Speedo and holding swim goggles while shopping for groceries. Final answer: no.


[User]
Premise: "A man is handing a young boy food items from his mobile motorcycle food cart."\nHypothesis: "A boy is buying food for dinner."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The food may be for someone else the boy might not be buying it for his dinner. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A woman in an elaborately decorated sweatshirt observes an event."\nHypothesis: "A woman in her christmas sweater watches the family tree be erected."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The sweatshirt might not be a Christmas sweater. The family tree may belong to someone else. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "An old man walks his dog in the financial district." can we conclude that "The man is walking alone in the meadow."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The man is either alone or with his dog. They are either in the financial district or the meadow. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Two children sit on a bench with black shirts."\nHypothesis: "Children are waiting for their parents."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Children sitting on a bench might not be waiting for their parents.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "Woman and man showing an image on a laptop." does that mean that "The man is showing the woman some vacation photos he took last year."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Not all images on a laptop are vacation photos. We don't know that he took the photo or that he did so last year. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "An older." is it true that "Male construction worker wearing a yellow vest climbing down from the roof of a building onto scaffolding."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A male construction worker climbs down from the roof of the building to save a cat. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A construction worker is on climbing on top of a building."\nHypothesis: "Nobody is climbing."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
If nobody is climbing as stated in sentence 2 then a construction worker cannot be climbing as stated in sentence 1.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A black man is talking to another man while holding a red cup in the middle of a crowd."\nHypothesis: "Three ladies are cooking."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man cannot be talking to another man if the subject of the sentence are ladies cooking.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "A teacher and her assistant are helping a group of toddlers with singing or exercising." that "Toddlers are singing."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Helping a group of toddlers with singing implies toddlers are singing.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Young girl playing goalie gets ready to throw the ball over her head." is it true that "The girl is letting the ball enter the goal."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
One who is playing goalie would not be letting the ball enter.
The answer: no.


[User] If "Two black-haired boys are squatting on the ground while holding handfuls of marbles." does that mean that "Two black-haired boys squatting on the ground holding handfuls of marbles."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Are squatting on the ground is a rephrasing of squatting on the ground.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Bicyclists and pedestrians share the road with a bus going down an urban street while two tall buildings loom in the background."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Bicyclists and pedestrians share the road with a bus." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The bicyclists and pedestrians are on the road with a bus. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Three people are sitting on a couch and one is playing with some balls."\nHypothesis: "An orgy in session on a couch."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Three people are sitting on a couch and one is playing with some balls does not indicate that an orgy in session on a couch. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A group to tennis players preparing to play." that "These guys hate tennis."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] One would not be preparing to play something that they hate. Final answer: no.


[User]
Premise: "Five people wearing white and black are on a tennis court."\nHypothesis: "Five referees are on a tennis court deliberating over a tennis match."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] People on a tennis court aren't necessarily deliberating over a tennis match. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A man and a woman can prepare meals at camp together." does that mean that "A little boy and girl are eating a meal together."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A little boy and girl are not a man and woman. Final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "Young girl cradles her face while facing a sparing partner." can we conclude that "A girl is in a boxing match."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Young girl cradles her face while facing a sparing partner does not imply that she is in a boxing match. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Seven people leaning over a rail wearing business attire." is it true that "Seven people are watching a police chase over a rail."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Seven people leaning over a rail wearing business attire does not indicate that they are watching a police chase over a rail.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A girl in a white gi with red gloves and a red belt holds her chin while an older male looks on." can we conclude that "A girl is wearing red gloves and belt."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] In red gloves and belt implies wearing red gloves and belt. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "An official consults with a competitor at a martial arts event."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "An official discusses the improper use of hands to the face at a karate tournament." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Not all martial arts events are a karate tournament and an official who consults is not necessarily about improper use of hands to the face.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "A girl in a karate outfit is talking to a man in a white shirt." that "A girl is talking to her karate teacher."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A girl talking to a man is not necessarily the girl's karate teacher. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: If "Two people are riding their bicycles through the city." does that mean that "Two people are touring the city on their bikes."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] People riding their bicycles through the city are not necessarily touring. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A girl in a pink dress dances with a girl in a black skirt to a band." is it true that "A boy and girl are dancing."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Either a two girls are dancing or a boy and girl are dancing.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Premise: "Four warmly dressed small children play in a snowy forested area while one holds onto a wagon."\nHypothesis: "Children play outside near their father."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Children who play in a snowy forested area are not necessarily near their father. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A man wearing a backpack stands alone in a wooded area." that "The man is inside sleeping on the floor."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Either the man is laying on the floor or stand alone either in a wooded area or inside. The answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A backpacker standing on a trail surrounded by tall trees."\nHypothesis: "The backpacker is standing outside."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The backpacker is outside because he/she is on a trail surrounded by trees. So the answer is yes.


[User] If "A little kid riding a small bike." does that mean that "The little kid is learning to ride a bike."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The fact that a kid is on a bike doesn't imply the kid is learning to ride.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A brunette woman brushes her teeth alone."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A woman is watching tv with her friends." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A woman can be a brunette a blond or many variations.
The answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "A dog bounding across the sandy landscape in front of people watching." that "The people are watching a car wreck."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
People can be watchind many things including a dog or a car wreck.
The answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Black dog running across dirt." is it true that "A black dog is chasing a frisbee in the park."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A running dog need not necessarily be chasing a frisbee in a park. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A dog lunges across a beach." is it true that "A dog jumps to get a bird."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A dog which lunges across a beach need not necessarily be jumping to get a bird. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Man in blue shirt and white shorts playing tennis." can we conclude that "The man playing tennis is wearing white shorts."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Man in white shorts is a rephrasing of man is wearing white shorts. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A man wearing a blue shirt and white shorts playing tennis."\nHypothesis: "A man is wearing a blue shirt."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The man is wearing the shirt right now and continues to wear it. So the final answer is yes.


[User] If "A young man in a blue shirt with white shorts volleys a tennis ball." does that mean that "A young woman in a blue shirt with white shorts volleys a tennis ball."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] You ca n play tennis whether you are a man or woman. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Roger federer strikes a tennis ball with a forehand swing on a tennis court."\nHypothesis: "Federer will beat his opponent."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Roger Federer will not necessarily beat an opponent just because he strikes a tennis ball with a forehand swing. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Two hockey teams are facing off." can we conclude that "A group of people are playing hockey."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Two hockey teams implies they are a group of people and facing off means the same thing as playing hockey. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A grocery store worker cleans cabbages near a large display of broccoli." can we conclude that "The grocery store worker is wearing a red apron."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The grocery store worker may or may not be wearing a red apron.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A small band dressed as peasants performs in the street."\nHypothesis: "A small band is packing up their equipment."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
They need their equipment to perform in the street so they cannot be packing up while doing a performance.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A curly-haired blond lady stands in front of a black trashcan in a grocery store cleaning cabbage next to a large pile of bright green broccoli."\nHypothesis: "A worker is cleaning vegetables."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The blond lady is not necessarily a worker. The lady is cleaning cabbage but not necessarily cleaning other types of vegetables. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "Performers in costumes are performing at a parade." that "The performers are naked."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] If they are in costumes then they would not be naked you cannot be both simultaneously. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A fireman climbing on charred ceiling beams of a burned out structure." is it true that "The fire fighter has his visor down."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A fireman climbing on a charred ceiling beam need not necessarily be having his visor down.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A firefighter is shown trying to climb into some debris." can we conclude that "The pile of debri is the remains of a house."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Firefighters climbing a pile of debris does not mean that it was formerly a house. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two children sit on a small seesaw in the sand."\nHypothesis: "The women stood next to the sand."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
If the woman stood next to the sand then she would be standing up and you cannot sit while standing.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
If "A fireman in action during an intense fire." does that mean that "A woman drinks milk."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Drinking milk is a mild activity and would not be the same as being in action. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Little leaguer getting ready for pitch."\nHypothesis: "The pitcher will strike out the batter."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Pitching does not imply that the pitcher will strike out the batter.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A girl in a pink bathing suit doing high jumps on a beach."\nHypothesis: "The girl is at the ocean."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A girl in bathing suit on a beach need not necessarily be at the ocean.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "A blond woman taking a photo of her young son in his bedroom." does that mean that "A blonde woman is taking a picture of her son who is wearing a dog costume."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Taking a photo does not imply that her son is wearing a dog costume. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A dog jumping over a fallen tree in the forest." that "A dog is chasing a rabbit in the forest."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Jumping over a fallen tree in the forest does not mean the dog was chasing a rabbit. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A young girl practices gymnastics while two younger kids play in the background."\nHypothesis: "The girl is getting ready to take a psat test."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The girl cannot practice gymnastics and be getting ready to take PSAT test. Final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "An old man is grilling food in a backyard."\nHypothesis: "The old man shopped for a new backyard grill at sears."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Grilling is present tense while shopped is past tense and a man cannot be in a backyard and at Sears simultaneously. Final answer: no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A man in tan pants and a red shirt is grilling something in a backyard."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man is eating at the table." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
It is difficult to be grilling and eating at the table simultaneously.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: If "Man carries a baby under an umbrella next to a woman in a red jacket." does that mean that "It's hot outside."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
It is unlikely a woman would be wearing a jacket if it is hot outside.
The answer: no.


[User] Can we conclude from "People are walking down the sidewalk in the rain." that "The people are sitting in the bright sunshine."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] One who is sitting cannot be walking. Rain is not the same as sunshine. So, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A young girl eating an onion ring at a fast food restaurant."\nHypothesis: "A girl sitting at a table in a restaurant."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Eating an onion ring doesn't imply sitting down at a table. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A lady in green shorts on a beach clapping her hands above her head while observing a band."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A lady in blue shorts jumps and dances while watching a band." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Green is not the same color as blue. One who dances is not necessarily clapping.
The answer: no.


[User]
Can we conclude from "Two men dressed up share a toast." that "Two women dressed up share a toast."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The two cannot be both men and women at the same time. The answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "Six people with camping backpacks are hiking up a sandy trail in single file." that "There are some people with camping gear walking in a line."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Walking single file is the same as walking in a line.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A skateboarding ramp located in a room with multicolored graffti painted on the wall."\nHypothesis: "The skateboarding ramp is for the local youth."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A skateboarding ramp may be for others and not just for the local youth.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: If "A group of hikers with backpacks are hiking a trail." does that mean that "Some hikers are carrying backpacks."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
They could have the backpacks on their backs instead of carrying them.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "The cowboy in blue is trying not to be thrown off of the horse."\nHypothesis: "The cowboy is chasing after his horse."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] One who is trying not to be thrown off is not one who is chasing. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "Two people are riding bicycles along a road." is it true that "A woman is jogging past a starbuck's."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
People are more than a woman. One cannot be riding if one is jogging.
The final answer: no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A child in a playground playing with the swing."\nHypothesis: "A child about to fall off the swing."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Playing with the swing does not imply about to fall off the swing.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "The quad at the student services fair." does that mean that "The grass outside of a community college."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Not all the quad at the student services fair is outside of a community college. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "People walking about a university campus with palm trees in the background." is it true that "People walking across a bridge with palm trees in the background."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Walking across a bridge is not the same thing as walking about a university campus. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A woman and a girl are looking at a hovering ball together."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The ball is part of a magic trick." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A hovering ball may be part of a science project and as such it cannot be concluded that a hovering ball must be part of a magic trick. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Young child plays on a swing set as construction workers dig in the background."\nHypothesis: "A kid swings as workers in hardhats use a bulldozer."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Not all construction workers dig in the background by a bulldozer. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A woman in a candy store browsing candy."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A woman is buying candy for her son." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Not all woman in a candy store browsing candy is buying candy for her son. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Girl working at a candy store stocks the merchandise."\nHypothesis: "Girl is buying candy as a customer."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
She would not be buying candy as a customer if she was working at the store.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A woman stocking shelves at a candy store."\nHypothesis: "The woman is taking items off the shelf."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Stacking means putting items on a shelf and that is the opposite of taking them off the shelf. So the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A young adult woman is standing next to a display in a candy store." is it true that "The woman is going to buy a sucker."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Standing next to a display in a candy store does not imply going to buy a sucker. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A woman in a white shirt is looking through objects at a store." does that mean that "A woman is looking through jeans on a table at the store."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Not all objects the woman looking through at store are jeans. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A rider on a horse landing from a jump."\nHypothesis: "A rider on a horse lands from a jump during the olympic equestrian event."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Not all rider on a horse landing from a jump is during the Olympic equestrian event.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A man riding a bucking bull at a rodeo." is it true that "A man is engaged in an activity."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Riding a bucking bull is a dangerous activity so it requires one to be fully engaged in the activity.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
If "Rider riding horse as it jumps over a fence." does that mean that "A horse is being ridden while jumping."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A horse is being ridden implies someone known as a rider is riding the horse. The answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "A person riding a gray horse who has just jumped." that "A dog barks."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A person and a horse are both not the same type of animal as a dog.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A small child in a costume looks up at an adult." is it true that "The child is looking upward."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Adult is taller than small child so they child have to looking upward to see them.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A small asian boy is walking down the street in tradition asian clothing looking back at a lady dressed in high heels and a beige skirt." that "A small asian boy sits alone in his room."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
One can not be in his room and be down the street simultaneously.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A young asian boy in navy blue traditional costume looks up at a woman wearing modern clothes as they both walk down a paved path." that "Some peoples are walking in park."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The paved path does not have to be in a park. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A young man in a red uniform kicking a soccer ball."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man is wearing red." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The man who is kicking a soccer ball wears a red uniform. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A group of young boys are playing baseball in a foreign country."\nHypothesis: "The players are sitting in the park."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The players could not be sitting and playing baseball at the same time. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A group of teenagers playing jump rope on a grassy turf."\nHypothesis: "The group of teenagers are playing soccer."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The teenagers cannot be playing jump rope and soccer at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "An elderly man plays guitar for money on the street."\nHypothesis: "An old homeless man tries to make a living."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Playing guitar for money in the street does not make you homeless. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A dog jumps up to catch an orange and blue tennis ball."\nHypothesis: "A dog plays fetch with a tennis ball."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A dog that jumps to catch a ball does not imply the dog is playing fetch. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Two greyhounds race." is it true that "The greyhounds are sleeping."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The greyhounds cannot race and be sleeping at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two dogs race across the track."\nHypothesis: "The dogs are running after a 3rd dog."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The dogs do not have to be running after another dog to be racing.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man is standing in front of a cafe."\nHypothesis: "There is a homeless man in front of the cafe."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A man can stand in front of a cafe and not be homeless. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "Two older men and one older woman sit around a table while talking." can we conclude that "The people are all laying in bed."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] People cannot be laying in bed and sitting at the same time. So the final answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Two men and one woman sitting at a table with a blue tablecloth."\nHypothesis: "Friends are together talking about food."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The people sitting together do not have to be friends or talking about food. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "Three adults finishing a meal and enjoying wine and discussion." can we conclude that "Three adults prepare to break their fast."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Three adults cannot be preparing breakfast while they are finishing a meal.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "The horse gallops around the field." that "A horse walking down the road."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A horse cannot be walking and galloping at the same time.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "Two young ballerinas pose before a sign reading ""babys""."\nHypothesis: "Two children are forced to dance by their insecure mothers who never accomplished anything."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Being a ballerina does not mean they are forced to dance. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A group of men stand outside." can we conclude that "A group of men outside a yellow building."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Standing outside does not imply there is a building present or that it is a yellow building.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
If "Several men wearing ethnic hats are watching the photographer in an outdoor market." does that mean that "Ethnically hatted men watch a photographer in suspicion."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Just because men wearing ethnic hats are watching the photographer doesn't mean they watch a photographer in suspicion. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Four men from another country look at the camera."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Foreigners are eating a camera." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] One does not look at a camera while simultaneously eating the camera. So, the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A small baby wearing sunglasses sits on an adult's lap." that "The baby is sleeping in a crib."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A baby cannot be sitting on an adult's lap while simultaneously sleeping in a crib. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Student: If "A woman is holding onto a baby wearing who is wearing sunglasses." does that mean that "A baby is wearing sunglasses."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] If there's a baby who is wearing sunglasses that shows that a baby is wearing sunglasses. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Two men playing frisbee outside."\nHypothesis: "The two men throw sawblades at each other."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The men cannot be playing frisbee and throwing sawblades at each other simultaneously.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A baby is dressed up in pink gear and staring while an adult holds her steady." can we conclude that "A man is holding his daughter wearing nike clothing."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] An adult holding a girl doesn't necessarily mean they are a man or her father. Pink gear isn't necessarily Nike. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Several people stand on a bike rack to look at something over bleachers."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Several people stand on a skateboard rack to look at something over bleachers." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A bike rack is not the same as a skateboard rack.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] If "Children mostly in red watching from the back of the bleachers." does that mean that "The children are watching a football game."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Being on bleachers doesn't mean the children are watching a football game. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man in a white shirt lines up his chisel as he completes his work as a small dog looks on."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "There is a man in a white shirt lining up his chisel." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] One who lines up his chisel is lining up his chisel. Final answer: yes.


[User]
If "A blond man looks at the camera." does that mean that "The man is modeling for the camera."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] When a man looks at a camera it does not imply that he is modeling for the camera. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "The blond man looks at the camera while another man looks into his eyes."\nHypothesis: "Two men and a camera."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
One blond man and another man adds up to be two men.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Two men with sunglasses on their heads facing each other in a crowd."\nHypothesis: "Two men have their backs to each other."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The men cannot be facing each other while having their backs to each other. So the answer is no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "Two men dressed in blue face each other."\nHypothesis: "The two men are staring at each other."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The two men face each other but aren't necessarily staring at each other. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "There is a man in a black trench coat." can we conclude that "A man is a gangster wearing a long coat."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Wearing a black trench coat does not make a person a gangster. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A child and woman exchange glances."\nHypothesis: "Not watched at alll."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The child and woman can either exchange glances or have not watched at all.
The final answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Two men and a small red vehicle outside a large group of parked bicycles." can we conclude that "Two friends are parked next to bikes by the mall."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Not all men are friends. Men within proximity to a vehicle have not necessarily parked that vehicle. Not everywhere is by the mall. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two men sit on a bench surrounded by plant life."\nHypothesis: "The men are in a garden."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The men may not be in a garden just because they are surrounded by plant life.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Three soldiers are marching in formation with guns held vertically towards the sky."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A few soldiers are marching during basic training." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The training does not indicate reasoning for the soldiers to be holding guns to the sky.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A flautist plays the flute in a marching band." does that mean that "A tuba player is in a marching band."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The marching band member cannot be both a flautist and a tuba player.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A short-haired man adjusting his tie with the help of the mirror in his hotel room."\nHypothesis: "The man in his hotel room is trying to decide what he's going to buy for dinner."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A man who is trying to decide what he wants for dinner would probably be reading a menu. Adjusting his tie probably takes some concentration.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A clean-shaven man getting dressed in a purple shirt and tie in front of the mirror."\nHypothesis: "A man getting ready for work."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A man getting dressed in front of the mirror is not necessarily getting ready for work.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A businessman in a dark suit is talking on a cellphone."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man talks to his broker." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A businessman talking on a cellphone is not necessarily talking to his broker. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man is looking at vegetables at a farmer's market." that "A person is looking at broccoli at a roadside stand."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A man looking at vegetables is not necessarily looking at broccoli and not all Farmer's Markets are roadside. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man in a blue shirt walking out a door."\nHypothesis: "A man walks into a door."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A man walking out a door can't walk into a door at the same instant. So, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A mexican man going to dig up the dirt for plants in the field." can we conclude that "A man shooting a gun in a field."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A man going to dig up the dirt can't be shooting a gun at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A man in a blue shirt is standing in a doorway." that "A man lays in bed."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A man who lays in bed can't be standing in a doorway. The answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Three dogs run across the track." can we conclude that "The dogs are at school track meet."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Dogs running does not mean they are participating in a school track meet. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man and woman hold a discussion near a microscope."\nHypothesis: "Two woman are talking outside."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man and woman is one male and one female while two woman are two female.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A man on a phone and a woman are in front of a wall."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man on a phone and a woman are near a wall." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Being in front of a wall and near a wall could be two totally different things.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A bike rider performs a trick."\nHypothesis: "A woman sleeping on a beautiful bed."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Person performing trick with a bike can not be sleeping at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User]
Premise: "Three asian people are watching the road."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Three people are watching tv." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] People who are watching the road can not be home watching tv at the same time. The answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A woman in plaid boots holds a red umbrella as she leaps in the air."\nHypothesis: "The woman forgot her umbrella."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Person who forgot umbrella can not holds umbrella at the same time. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "Patrons waiting at and nearby a crosswalk in a foreign country." that "Patrons are waiting to get into a nightclub."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Not all patrons at a crosswalk are waiting to get into a nightclub.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A woman with an umbrella is jumping in a park." does that mean that "A woman jumps."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A woman that is jumping in a park jumps regardless of where she is.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man in a tropical shirt is playing piano in a bar."\nHypothesis: "The man is playing the piano."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The person is a man because he is a man in a tropical shirt. The answer is yes.


[User]
If "A man at a mic playing a piano and keyboard." does that mean that "A man is making music."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A mic is used to record a piano and keyboard that are instruments used to play music. The answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "Old man smoking cigarette on bench." that "A man smoking."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] One is smoking if they are smoking a cigarette regardless of location. So the final answer is yes.