[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A half naked man in ethnic dress is breathing fire." can we conclude that "A man is half naked breathing fire."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Both sentences state that a man who is half naked is breathing fire. So the final answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "A girl blows the seeds from a dandelion on a picturesque day." that "The girl is holding a flower."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A girl blows the seeds from a dandelion does not imply that she is holding a flower.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A group of men who are working on the power lines." does that mean that "The men are working with a downed power line."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Working on the power lines does not mean that it is downed power line.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two men wearing bright orange safety vests are working to repair electrical lines."\nHypothesis: "Two men working on electrical lines are sabotaging them."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Men working to repair does not imply they are sabotaging them. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A young girl wearing pink pants and a white shirt is watering a flower in a pot." is it true that "A girl is watering her flowers."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A girl watering a flower does not imply she is watering her flowers. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A kid with a red shirt playing basketball." can we conclude that "A kid has a red shirt."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] With a red shirt is the same as has a red shirt. So, the answer is yes.


[User] If "Two trolley repair men are fixing a line." does that mean that "Two workers are repairing a line."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Repair men are workers and fixing is a synonym for repairing.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Given the sentence "This person is rock climbing." can we conclude that "There is a person climbing the north face of the eiger."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Rock climbing does not imply the north face of the Eiger. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A group of young asian men playing water volleyball." is it true that "They are playing indoor soccer."?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Can't play water volleyball and indoor soccer at the same time. So the final answer is no.


[User] If "A swimming pool with men tossing a ball around." does that mean that "Men playing ball in a pool."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Swimming pool with men implies that men are in a pool. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A person in an orange helmet climbs up a sheer cliff face." is it true that "A person is going to the top of a cliff."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Climbs a cliff face does not imply to go to the top of the cliff. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A rock climber looks up while traversing a route." can we conclude that "A rock climber looks at the sky while traversing a route."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The rock climber looks up so he must be looking at the sky. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A man wearing a backpack is climbing a rock." is it true that "A man is wearing a backpack."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Wearing a backpack is a paraphrase of is wearing a backpack.
The answer: yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "A person climbing a large moss-covered rock." that "A person climbing a rock because they want to find treasure."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Climbing a rock does not imply it is to find treasure.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "Looks like students are in a laboratory." that "People standing in a room full of machines."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Laboratory does not imply a room of machines. Students are in the room; this does not mean they are standing. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A surfer is riding a surfboard on top of a breaking wave." that "A surfer tans on the beach."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] They could both be doing the same thing but one says that the surfer is riding the surf while the other does not mention any motion only tanning. The answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "Two young people compete in a game of ping-pong." is it true that "Two young people are sitting down and watching television."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The of competing in ping pong requires movement and the activity of sitting down watching television requires no movement.
The final answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Three people in the snow put their gear in order." is it true that "A group of people put their gear in order for their hike."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] People in the snow arranging their gear aren't necessarily on a hike. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Three men loading items on a sled."\nHypothesis: "Men load a sled."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Three men are men and loading items on a sled is a paraphrase of load a sled.
The answer: yes.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Four children looking at rocks in the middle of the desert."\nHypothesis: "Boys are running in desert to win race."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Children in desert looking at rocks in no way implies that the children are running a race. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "Three fire-fightes use a hose to put out a car that is on fire and smoking a lot." can we conclude that "Parked next to a street sign."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Three firefighters put out a burning car that was set on fire by accident. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "Three people hiking in the woods climbing uphill." that "The people are not in the woods."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] If the people are hiking in the woods then they must be in the woods. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A girl painting pottery." is it true that "A girl is working on something."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A girl is painting pottery shows that she is working on something.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] If "People enjoying a cold but sunny day in the park." does that mean that "The people in the park are wearing jackets."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
People enjoying a cold but sunny day in the park does not indicate that they are wearing jackets.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "Two young boys in casual attire playing twister with other children." can we conclude that "The boys are falling down during their game."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Two young boys in casual attire playing Twister with other children does not indicate that they are falling down during their game.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Young boy in a winter hat sliding down a snowy hill."\nHypothesis: "A young boy is on a sled."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A boy can be sliding down a snowy hill without being on a sled.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Two women who are in gray sleeveless tops are getting down from a bus taking all their belongings."\nHypothesis: "Two women playing checkers at a dining room table."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] One can not be getting down from a bus and at a table simultaneously. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Two women wearing green shirts are getting off a tour bus."\nHypothesis: "People are visiting a foreign city."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
People getting off a tour bus are not necessarily visiting a foreign city.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Two women in green shirts are exiting a vehicle." can we conclude that "The women are in their bedroom."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] One can not be exiting a vehicle and in their bedroom simultaneously. Final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "This man is walking past a wall that has art on it."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A small boat floats in a calm lake." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Boats do not float in a place where there is a wall. Final answer: no.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A bicyclist in a full face helmet negotiates an outdoor course on his bike."\nHypothesis: "A bicyclist is at an outdoor course."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A bicyclist negotiates an outdoor course means the bicyclist must be at an outdoor course. The answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "Two teams of football players about to start a game." that "Two teams of football players start a game."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
About to start a game implies that they start a game.
The answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "Three men from a different country are preparing for worship."\nHypothesis: "Three men of different religions prey before having a meeting."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] It is likely the religions are the same for all of them. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man in a gray jacket and blue cap shops with other people at the fish market."\nHypothesis: "A man and wife are eating at a steak house."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Either a man shops at the fish market or a couple is eating at a steak house. So, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A lot of people at the market looking at various different things." can we conclude that "The people all looked at the same thing at the market."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Either the people look at different things or the same thing.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
If "Two people one girl and one boy and it looks like they are dancing in what looks like a club." does that mean that "The two people are interested in becoming boyfriend and girlfriend."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] They could already be married instead of just now becoming boyfriend and girlfriend. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A male and female dance to swing music."\nHypothesis: "Dressed in 1950's style clothing."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
In their 50's style clothing a couple dance to swing music.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A baby in a red shirt is crying while an adult holding the baby mocks it." that "A baby is crying because it's hungry."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Baby is crying does not always imply that it is hungry.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A band performing outside."\nHypothesis: "A band performs outside on a warm night."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Performing outside does not imply that they are performing on a warm night. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A baby cries in a woman's arms."\nHypothesis: "A woman holds a baby."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
One has to use one's arms in order to holds something.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "A closeup photo of a small dog with a holey ball in his mouth." is it true that "The dog is available for adopion."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Taking closeup photo of a dog does not make it available for adoption. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "The dog is carrying a whiffle ball outside." does that mean that "His owner threw the ball for him to fetch."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Dog carrying a ball outside does not imply that the owner threw the ball. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
If "Several people sitting on what appears to be a carnival ride." does that mean that "There are several people sitting on what appears to be a carnival ride."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Several people sitting on a carnival ride is the same as several people sitting on a carnival ride. The answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "People in some type of amusement park ride while one person operates it."\nHypothesis: "There is noone operating the ride."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
One person cannot be operating the ride if there is none operating the ride.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two women are bathing at a spa."\nHypothesis: "Females are washing themselves."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Two women are females and bathing and washing imply the same activity.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "A black dog jumping." can we conclude that "A dog laying down."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The dog jumping is not same as the one laying down. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Several people are standing around under a clear blue sky."\nHypothesis: "People are watching a televised sunrise."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] People under a clear blue sky cannot be the same people watching a television sunrise. So, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "The back of a light brown dog sitting on sand looking out at a rock and the ocean."\nHypothesis: "A dog is sitting on the sand."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A dog sitting on the sand is a generalization of the information. So the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A woman sits on a park bench eating ice cream." that "A woman is eating ice cream."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A woman eating ice cream is a generalization of the information. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A woman wearing a short-sleeved striped shirt and carrying a green shopping bag examines fish in an open air market while a vendor in a white apron over a gray t-shirt hands her an empty plastic bag."\nHypothesis: "A woman and vendor in her apartment."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
One can not be in an apartment and in an open air market simultaneously.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "An employee is handing a woman a bag while she is browsing through fish on ice at a street market."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The lady decided to stay at her house all day because of the rain." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] One can not stay at a house and be at a street market simultaneously. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A woman at a fish market is looking at the fish that are frozen." that "The woman is a professional chef."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A woman at a fish market is looking at the fish that are frozen does not necessary that she is a professional chef.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "The woman is at marketplace buying fish from an arabic person." is it true that "The woman is conversing with the arabic man."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The woman is at marketplace buying fish from an Arabic person does not imply that she is conversing with the Arabic man.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "Man in purple shirt falls off bulls head." that "A man falls off of a bull's head."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The man falling off the bull's head is wearing the purple shirt.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A bull is tossing a rider off him while several other cowboys try to restrain it." is it true that "A rider at a rodeo is getting destroyed."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A bull is tossing a rider off him while several other cowboys try to restrain it does not necessary that a rider at a rodeo is getting destroyed.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A tennis player in red shorts is hitting the tennis ball."\nHypothesis: "A person is playing a game of tennis."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
People that play the game of tennis are referred to as tennis players.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "An artist works diligently at painting a piece of ornate pottery." that "A man makes his first pottery."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man makes his first pottery is not necessary to be an artist.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man in a blue shirt and jeans poses by large mossy rocks."\nHypothesis: "A man in jeans is sitting on a river bank."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Either the man is by a river bank or by large rocks. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A man sits underneath a large and colorful rock formation."\nHypothesis: "The man is sitting in front of the tv."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
If he is sitting underneath a rock formation then he is outside and not sitting in front of tv inside.
The answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "A man is laying under a large mossy rock in the forest." can we conclude that "A man is inside playing with rocks."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A man laying under a rock in the forest can not be inside playing with rocks. Final answer: no.


[User]
Can we conclude from "Person with a red bandanna is skateboarding down a pole with buildings in the background." that "A professional skateboarder is skating down a pole for a documentary film."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Person who is skateboarding down a pole isn't necessarily a professional skateboarder and skateboarding down a pole doesn't necessarily imply for a documentary film. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A little boy jumps into a child's pool in a backyard." can we conclude that "The boy drinks water from the backyard hose."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The boy can either jump into pool or drink water from a hose but not both simutaneously. Final answer: no.


[User]
Given the sentence "Two young men play a board game." is it true that "Cat chases mice."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] This information is a non-sequitur. Men playing a game and cats chasing mice have no relation upon each other. The answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two women examine the leaves of a plant."\nHypothesis: "The woman are looking at a man eating plant."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The women must either be examing the plant or watching the man eat but not both.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A shopkeeper is explaining something to a patron."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A shopkeeper is ignoring a patron because he's too busy checking his emails." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The shopkeeper is both speaking and being silent (ignoring) at the same time.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: If "Two ladies looking at plants." does that mean that "There are two females who are awake."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Ladies is a synonym for females. One can only look at plants when one is awake.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "The man in the tan shirt gives to the man in the wheelchair and hat."\nHypothesis: "A man is pushing his friend in the wheelchair."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The man cannot do the two actions of giving and pushing at once. Final answer: no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "People ordering and browsing food in a food market."\nHypothesis: "Shoppers looking at and buying food at a market."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
People a re the shoppers and they are ordering and browsing means that they are buying food.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A man donates to a panhandler." is it true that "An old panhandler is given a generous donation from a young college student."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Not every panhandler is old. Not every man is a college student. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A person wearing a white shirt and black pans is jumping of a riff."\nHypothesis: "Someone is jumping into some water."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A person is jumping of a riff doesn't imply that someone is jumping into some water. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A mexican man unfolds a large piece of paper at a birthday celebration."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is unfording paper at a birthday party." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A mexican man is a man. Unfolds a large piece of paper is a rephrasing of unfolding paper. And a party implies a celebration.
The answer: yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man using a large drill on a city building." that "The man is repairing the building."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A drill can be used on a building for reasons other than repairing the building. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A little girl sitting on bleachers." is it true that "A little girl is sitting down."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Sitting on a bleachers can be only done while sitting down.
The answer: yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man is standing in front of a party." that "With several children and party decorations (including balloons) also in the shot."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A man stands outside of a party with several children and balloons.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "Little girl in a bicycle helmet touching a large brown horse." can we conclude that "A little girl is wearing head protection."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A helmet is a type of head protection and girl wearing head protection is a rephrasing of girl in helmet.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A woman holds an infant baby on a back porch."\nHypothesis: "Woman holding a baby boy."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A woman holds an infant baby on a back porch does not necessary that she holding a baby boy. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A brunette woman holds a child outside."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A woman is singing to her baby outside." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A brunette woman holds a child outside does not indicate that she is singing to her baby outside. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Three men dressed in suits are standing in front of a india inc. sign."\nHypothesis: "Three men are in a business meeting."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A business meeting would not take place while standing in front of a India Inc. sign. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "Three professional men in suits stand around talking." that "Three stock brokers are trading tips."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Three professional men in suits stand around talking does not indicate that three stock brokers are trading tips. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A white man is speaking with two indian businessmen."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The men are conducting business together." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The man is speaking with businessmen so he must be conducting business. So the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "Three men in business clothing talking." is it true that "The men walking to canteen."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Men in business clothing often walk to other places together besides to a canteen. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A young female baseball player slides to home base but is caught by the umpire."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The umpire is the girls father." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] An umpire isn't often the father of someone on the baseball team. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "Several people are gathered by some statues." that "The people had arranged to meet by the statues and then go on for lunch."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Gathered by some statues doesn't imply that the people had arranged to meet and then go on for lunch. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A mud covered cyclist zooms down the trail."\nHypothesis: "A cyclist zooms as fast as he can."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The cyclist could be zooming and still not be going as fast as he can.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "This guy is about to finish a 8 mile run with his team."\nHypothesis: "The group have been swimming in the ocean."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The guy and his team are either finishing an 8 mile run or they had been swimming in the ocean. It can't be both. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A firefighter looking out the window."\nHypothesis: "There are no windows."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A firefighter is either looking out the window or there are no windows. It cannot be both. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Women walk down a city street."\nHypothesis: "Women are walking."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Regardless of the location you walk down you are still considered walking. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A cyclist is racing down the street."\nHypothesis: "The biker is pedaling fast."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A cyclist who is racing would need to be pedaling fast in order to be competitive. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "Several people sitting and standing on a grassy area next to the water."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "People are looking at the water." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Just because next to the water does not mean they are looking at the water. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A group of people on a riverbank some sitting on the grass some standing."\nHypothesis: "People are hanging out on the river bank."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Hanging out specifies what the group who was sitting and standing was doing. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A group of people on a bicycle trip taking a break on a street corner."\nHypothesis: "A group of people take a brek from riding their bikes."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] From riding bikes tells from what the people are taking a break. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Four girls are sitting in the grass while several men stand near them."\nHypothesis: "Four girls are sitting in the grass talking about the several men standing near them."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Girls with men near them doesn't imply girls talking about the men. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A woman works by a store."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The store is big." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A store that a woman works by does not have to be big. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A girl in an orange outfit opens a silver suitcase with a hammer inside." that "The girl in orange opened the suitcase."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A girl in orange is a girl in an orange outfit. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A woman in an orange dress opens a numbered briefcase."\nHypothesis: "Revealing an image of a hammer."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A woman is working as a model on a game show and opening a case. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "Lady standing in front of store window in a blue dress talking on a cellphone with people walking down the street." is it true that "The woman is talking to her husband."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Lady on a cell phone does not imply she is talking to her husband. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "A blond woman in a blue jacket is talking on her cellphone in front of a building." does that mean that "A lady in a coat talks on her phone."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A woman who is talking on her cellphone is a woman who talks on her phone. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A girl fixes her earring on the side of a busy."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Wide sidewalk." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The lady's earring fell out when she quickly turned her head.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A tennis player getting ready to hit the ball while standing on a bright orange court."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A tennis player is getting ready to hit the ball." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A player getting ready to hit the ball is a player getting ready to hit the ball. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Asian people sit with their boxed display of brown items."\nHypothesis: "People sitting with displays to see items."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Just because the asian people sit on a display doesn't mean they sitting to see items.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Man with white shirt and green shorts poses for a picture."\nHypothesis: "The man is wearing clothes."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A man with a shirt and shorts is a man who is wearing clothing.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A little girl kneeling in the dirt crying." is it true that "A little girl is crying because she hurt herself."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] She because she is kneeling and crying does not mean she hurt herself. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Two women in athletic gear walking down a city street."\nHypothesis: "Two women are see outside of a cafe juggling cameras."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The two women going for a walk down the street cannot be seen outside a cafe juggling cameras at the same time. They can only be doing one activity.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Two women in skirts and baseball caps pass another woman in a skirt on the street." can we conclude that "All three women in the scene are wearing skirts."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Two women in skirts and another woman in a skirt imply there are three women who are all wearing skirts. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A motorcycle is siting beside a lighted movie advertisement."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The tv is playing a movie." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A lighted movie advertisement is not the same as a tv which is playing a movie. Final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "A well lit advertising stand showcasing various movie posters." can we conclude that "Some amazing posters."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Just because the advertising is on showcase doesn't mean it's amazing. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: If "A motorcycle is parked next to an information booth on a dark street." does that mean that "The motorcycle is parked."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A motorcycle is parked next to an information booth implies the bike is parked.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "In a outdoor market two men shovel snow and slush out of the path." can we conclude that "Two men are shoveling snow."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Two men are shoveling snow is a rephrasing of two men shovel snow.
The answer: yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A group of middle-aged women talking with each other." that "Women discuss politics."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Women talking with each other does not mean they discuss politics.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Office workers having fun."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The people are enjoying themselves." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Office workers are people and having fun implies they are enjoying themselves.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A group of people in formal attire are in the background and a man in a white shirt with khaki pants jumps from the dirt road to the green grass."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "There are people wearing fancy clothes." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] People in formal attire signifies they are dressed in fancy clothes. Final answer: yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "Someone is getting some serious air while the more formally dressed group gathers in the background." that "A pro skateboarder gets some air."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Someone is getting some serious air doesnt imply that it is a skateboarder . So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A woman is forming clay on a pottery well."\nHypothesis: "A woman is making a clay pot."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A woman forming clay on a pottery well is not necessarily is making a clay pot. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A woman in a white t-shirt and red pepper apron working at a potters wheel."\nHypothesis: "A tee shirted woman works a potters wheel."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A tee shirted woman is a rephrasing of a woman in a t-shirt. So the final answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A blond woman kneels on the floor as she works on a piece of pottery on a pottery wheel."\nHypothesis: "A blond woman with a pottery wheel sits on the floor and works on her piece."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Kneels on the floor is another way to say sits on the floor.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Two women sit at a table and smile."\nHypothesis: "The women are standing in the mall."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
One does not sit at a table in the mall randomly.
The final answer: no.


[User]
If "Black dog looking at his reflection in the water." does that mean that "The dog is by the water."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A dog looking at his reflection in water is by water. The answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man is sitting at a desk in front of four lit computer monitors." that "A man is sitting at his desk reading a book."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A man can be reading a book sitting in front of four lit computer monitors. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "A black and white dog looking up." that "A dog is staring at the ground where it's digging a hole."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A dog can not stare at the ground and looking up at the same time.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Waiters bringing people food in outside vendor restaurant market."\nHypothesis: "The waiters have the day off."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Waiters cannot be bringing people food when they have the day off.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "People are in a restaurant eating."\nHypothesis: "A solitary man reading a book by candlelight."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A man would not be solitary if hes in a restuarant eating with people. Final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A woman wearing dark clothing is aligning string to wood to make a craft."\nHypothesis: "The woman is chopping vegetables."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The woman can not chop vegtebles and make a craft at the same time. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A old woman stands by a yellow bucket and weaves on a loom."\nHypothesis: "An elderly woman weaving textiles on equipment."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The woman weaves textiles on a loom. A loom can be a type of equipment. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "A couple sitting on a bench facing each other." is it true that "A man and a woman are sitting together."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A pair of people on a bench are not necessarily sitting together. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man in shorts is sweeping the sidewalk."\nHypothesis: "A man wearing shorts is sweeping the sidewalk outside."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A man who is sweeping the sidewalk implies that the man is sweeping outside.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "One man in a red shirt and another in a gray shirt walking down a courtyard."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The men walked down the courtyard." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] One man in a red shirt and another in a gray shirt are not necessarily two men. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "There is a little boy in a red shirt and a dirty face and he is smiling." does that mean that "A child looks amused with a dirty face."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A child who is smiling does not necessarily imply that he looks amused. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A little boy with a messy face sitting on a colorful blanket." can we conclude that "There is someone sitting on the colorful blanket."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A little boy on a blanket can be someone sitting on a blanket. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "A man is sitting in a chair by a lake." does that mean that "A man sits outside."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A man sitting by a lake is likely to be sitting outside. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "Two soccer players rush towards the ball." can we conclude that "Two players are catching the ball."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] They are either catching the ball or rushing towards the ball. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "While standing in a group of men."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two men are sharing joint attention on a small electronic device and expressing happy emotions." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Two men are watching a YouTube video on an electronic device.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A team of soccer players all dressed in white and green two of these male players are looking at a phone smiling." that "Two soccer players run after a ball."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Two soccer players do not make a team and they are either looking at a phone or trying to run after a ball but not both. So the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "Woman in a costume and headdress of multiple colors holding a baton." that "A woman is in a multi colored headdress."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The headdress is a part of the costume that the woman wears. Final answer: yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "Various people are walking down a sidewalk lined with trees and a tan stone building." that "People are eating lunch in a cafeteria."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A sidewalk lined with trees is outdoors while a cafeteria is indoors. So the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A woman with messy hair." is it true that "A blue jean jacket and white pants looks down at something."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A wild-haired woman is looking for her lost earring on the ground.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Women wearing jean jacket over striped shirt walking in dock yard." can we conclude that "The woman is looking at packages on the dock."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Walking in a dock yard does not imply looking at packages. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "The little kids all play and jump around inside the inflatable toy."\nHypothesis: "Some kids are sword fighting."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The kids can't play with sword while jumping in the inflatable toy. So the final answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two men climbing up a mountain."\nHypothesis: "The men have gear with them."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Climbing up a mountain does not necessarily mean one is smart enough to have gear with them. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Asian children are preparing for a race on a racetrack."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The children are running preparing for the 100-yard dash." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Children preparing for a race doesn't connote that they are running or that they are preparing for a 100-yard dash. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A boat carrying several men is pulled to shore by a large team of horses." can we conclude that "The men are wearing hats."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Men on a boat does not imply they were wearing hats. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Small blond girl balances on one foot on a sandy rock while man and woman walk away in the background." is it true that "Girl enjoys spring break."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A girl who balances on one foot doesn't even remotely imply that she enjoys spring break.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A dog is licking its nose in the grass." can we conclude that "The dog is on the bed."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] If one is in grass then one is not on bed. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "A closeup of a dog with a white chest licking its nose."\nHypothesis: "The dog is black everywhere except his chest."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A dog with a white chest does not imply that the dog is black everywhere else. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A brown dogs licks its black nose."\nHypothesis: "The brown dog just ate something."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A dog licking it's nose doesn't imply that it just ate. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A closeup of a dog licking his nose."\nHypothesis: "A dog is showing his tongue."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The dog is either licking his nose or showing his tongue.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "Two men having a drink at a bar."\nHypothesis: "There are men in the bar."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The men are having a drink at the bar or just in the bar. So the final answer is yes.


[User]
Premise: "A spiky haired woman in an orange sweater holds a drink."\nHypothesis: "The woman is holding a drink."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The women has spiky hair and an orange sweater or she doesnt. The answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man is standing by a group of video games in a bar."\nHypothesis: "A man is standing by a group of video games."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A man is in a bar where video games are being played. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Man doing stunt on bike in a skate park."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man in a skate park is doing a stun on a bike." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
He is either doing a stunt or a stun. The latter word is not correct.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Many people are walking along a path next to a long building and trees." is it true that "A group of people walk past some trees."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
There either is a path and a long building or their isn't.
The answer: yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A man dressed all in black performs a trick on a rail while wearing inline skates."\nHypothesis: "A man is skiing down the hill."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A man skiing down the hill would not be wearing inline skates and performing a trick on a rail.
The answer: no.


[User] If "A woman is smiling and sitting next to a smiling man in front of a table with potted plants." does that mean that "The man is alone."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
If the man is alone then a woman is not sitting next to the man.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "Baseball player looking out into a stadium crowd." is it true that "A baseball player is looking at a crowd of fans."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A baseball player looking out into a stadium crowd does not mean they are his fans. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Two asian people look at flowers lined up on a table."\nHypothesis: "Two people pick out flowers for a wedding."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Looking at flowers does not mean they are for a wedding. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A young lady and young man looking at potted plants on a table."\nHypothesis: "Two people are sitting at the table."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Two people may be looking at something on a table without sitting at the table. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "People pass in front of a tan building during the day." is it true that "People walking along the city sidewalk."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A tan building doesn't mean the people have to be on a city sidewalk and they might be in the country or the suburbs.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A baseball player standing on the field."\nHypothesis: "A player is on the field."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A player is said to be a baseball playter and he is on the field. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Five men working in a kitchen."\nHypothesis: "The men are all friends."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Five men working together does not imply they are all friends. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "Three young boys in jeans and long-sleeved shirts are huddled together on a rusty piece of equipment." does that mean that "The three young boys are relatives."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Just because Three young boys in jeans and long-sleeved shirts are huddled together on a rusty piece of equipment does not mean they are relatives. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A man climbs up the side of a steep rock that overlooks a river."\nHypothesis: "A man is looking at a river from a rock."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Hes in position to be looking at the river from the rock. Implies motive.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A black woman with a guitar is playing on the sidewalk."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "There is two black women on the sidewalk playing a guitar." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A black woman is different from two black women playing a guitar on the sidewalk.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A man in a tuxedo is standing on stage with a keyboard and another man with a guitar." that "A man wears a tuxedo to a restaurant."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The man in tuxedo is either on stage or at a restaurant not both. The answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A cowboy is falling from a brown jumping horse." is it true that "A brown horse is in the air."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The horse is brown and jumping puts it in the air.
The final answer: yes.


[User] If "A woman in an orange top is demonstrating a karate kick." does that mean that "The woman kicked a spoon to the moon."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Demonstrating a karate kick doesn't involve kicking a spoon to the moon.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Young men loitering outside of a bank."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The young men are going to rob the bank." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Just because Young men loitering outside of a bank does not mean they will rob the bank. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "4 teenagers are standing outside a wells fargo bank."\nHypothesis: "Teenagers are hanging out outside."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Just because 4 teenagers are standing outside a Wells Fargo bank does not indicate that they are hanging out outside. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "Four people in front of wells fargo." that "People in front of a bank."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Four people in front of wells fargo does not indicate that people in front of a bank.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man in a pink shirt kneels down and looks right at the camera."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is looking at the camera shooting a supermodel in ibiza." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A man kneeling with a camera isn't necessarily shooting a supermodel. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "There is a snow skier on a slalom course taking a turn."\nHypothesis: "There is a skier on the mountain going down an advanced course."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
There is a snow skier on a slalom course taking a turn doesn't imply the skier is on a mountain.Not all slalom courses is an advanced course.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A strange man looks unsure of what he is doing near a washing machine." that "A man is throwing out his clothes."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Unsure of what he is doing does not indicate throwing out something. Final answer: no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "Man in white shirt and black cap hands out food tray."\nHypothesis: "The waiter is serving people at the event."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Man in white shirt and black cap handing out food tray is waiter at the event. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man wearing a white shirt and gloves is holding a checkered box." that "The man was an alien."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] An alien does not wear a white shirt and hold a checkered box. Final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "Workers are wearing hard hats at a construction site while building something with wood."\nHypothesis: "Some men are working on a skyscraper."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Workers are wearing hard hats at a construction site while building something with wood does not indicate that some men are working on a skyscraper. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A man hunched over is holding a figure while looking at the table in front of him." does that mean that "A man bathes a dog."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Bathing a dog is far more laborious then just holding a figure.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Two young girls are positioned behind a table covered in various toys and miniatures."\nHypothesis: "Two girls sit opposite each other at a table."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
One can not be behind a table and at a table simultaneously.
The answer: no.


[User]
Can we conclude from "Three construction workers working on digging on a hole." that "While the supervisor looks at them."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The supervisor is making sure they are doing a good job. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A shirtless young boy sits on the top of a pile of rocks."\nHypothesis: "A boy atop a pile of rocks at the beach."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A shirtless young boy sits on the top of a pile of rocks does not indicate that a boy atop a pile of rocks at the beach. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A curly headed child poses for a picture on the top side of a huge rock." that "The child is hiding under his bed."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
One cannot be hiding under a bed and be a person who poses for a picture simultaneously.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A dog playing in water." is it true that "A dog lays on a reclining chair."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] If a dog is playing it does not lay on a chair. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Three people in black and white costumes talking on the street."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "People in costumes." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Three people in black and white costumes implies people in costumes.
The answer: yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Three ladies chat wearing silver leggings and matching wigs."\nHypothesis: "Three women are talking about their matching wigs and silver leggings."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The ladies do not have to be talking about the same thing.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Two brightly dressed women with hats are looking at something."\nHypothesis: "Two women dress in dark clothes for a funeral."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] If women are looking for something the are not dressed for a funeral. So the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Three men stand next to the water."\nHypothesis: "Preparing to grill."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Three men stand next to the water in their bathing suits.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Barbecue for three on the boardwalk overlooking the water."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Barbecue for 10 at the cemetery." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Three and 10 are different quantities. Boardwalk and cemetery are different places. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] If "An outdoor sofa is being occupied by a sleepy teenager." does that mean that "A teenager is sitting on a sofa."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Sitting on a sofa is the typical way to occupy it; therefore one that is occupied by a teenager indicates that the teenager is sitting on it. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A man lies down on a couch that has been placed on the street." that "A man is taking a nap on a couch in his yard."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The couch may not be in his yard. It could be in someone else's yard or even on the actual street. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A young man climbs a mountain." that "Another follows below."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A couple races to see who can get to the top first. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Young man in red shirt leaps from a handrail."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A teen leaps from a handrail into the pool at his house." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The young man could be leaping from a handrail to the bottom of a set of stairs and not a pool at his house. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A group of greyhound dogs racing with muzzles covering their noses." can we conclude that "There's a dog race."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Greyhound dogs racing with muzzles covering their noses implies a dog race.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A man walking on the sidewalk past storefronts." is it true that "The man is window shopping for clothes."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Walking past storefronts doesn't mean window shopping. The man could be hurrying to lunch or an appointment. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "The sign on the bin of crabs at the market says$ 12 a dozen and$ 6.50 for a half a dozen."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "There is a sign at the market." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] There is a sign on the bin of crabs and the bin of crabs is at the market so there is a sign at the market. So the answer is yes.


[User] If "A man wearing yellow riding a bike." does that mean that "A man steering a bike."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
If you are riding a bike you have to be steering it so there is a man steering a bike.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "A man in yellow is biking past a gray building with columns." that "A man is biking."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Man in yellow is biking past a gray building is a rephrasing of man is biking. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A person in a yellow shirt cycles past a historic looking building."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A tall human cycling." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The person in the yellow shirt could be short and not a tall human. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A professional bicyclist wearing a yellow shirt and black shorts rides by an old building." can we conclude that "A person rides past a building wearing yellow and black."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A professional bicyclist is a person who is wearing black and yellow as he rides by a building. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A bicyclist wearing a black and yellow racing suit rides along a street near a granite building."\nHypothesis: "There is a person riding a bicycle."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
If a bicyclist rides along a street then there is a person riding a bicycle.
The answer: yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "Four men walking around a construction site." that "The men are on lunch break."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Men might walk around a construction site without being on a lunch break. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "A band is playing guitars and singing into microphones." is it true that "Some musicians are making music."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Band is a group of musicians and playing guitars is a kind of making music. The answer is yes.


[User] If "Three musicians perform on their guitars while singing." does that mean that "The people are playing guitar."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Musicians are people are are playing their guitars in a performance.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Can we conclude from "Three men are on stage with their guitars and microphones and a colorful xylophone." that "A band is performing for a small crowd."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Men can be on a stage without there being a crowd. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A high angle view of three male musicians performing in a dark setting with guitars strapped onto them and a xylophone."\nHypothesis: "The musicians are playing drums."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The musicians cannot be playing drums and guitars and a xylophone at the same time.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Three teenage girls walking down the sidewalk together on a nice day." is it true that "Girls are walking in the daytime."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] If the girls are walking on a nice day that means it is daytime. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A man in a red jacket stands near a yellow kayak."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Man is ready to start the kayak." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The man stands near a kayak which means he is ready to start the kayak. So the final answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Three men are gathering next to a blue tractor in a warehouse."\nHypothesis: "Men meeting near a tractor."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Gathering means meeting and next to is the same as near.
The answer: yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "People walking around a forklift." that "Two men at a construction site."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] There are people who are not men and a forklift can be used outside of a construction site. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Three females talking in front of a sallie mae banner." is it true that "Two old men discuss the days weather angrily."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The group cannot consist of both three and two people. The people cannot be both females and men.
The answer: no.


[User] Premise: "The dancer gets her final makeup before going out on stage."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The dancer does not wear any makeup when going on stage." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The dancer cannot get her final makeup and still not wear any makeup on the stage. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "Two men fixing drag queen's costume." can we conclude that "Several yound lagies gather to work on their drag queen costumes."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Several implies a group of more than two. The people cannot be both men and ladies. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "On a snowy day." that "A child in a red coat touches a dinosaur statue."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A child is outside on a snowy day in a red coat. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A performer wearing a h."\nHypothesis: "That performer has an h on his uniform."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
An H on his uniform can be a H or a h.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A blue car and a red car are racing on a track."\nHypothesis: "A blue car is in the garage while the red car is loaded on a trailer."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The cars cannot be racing if one is in the garage and the other is being loaded on the trailer (both activities which require the cars to be parked).
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Two men in a van are talking to each other."\nHypothesis: "There are two men in a van talking."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] When there are only two men in a van then they must be talking to each other only. Final answer: yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A woman with a black purse is sitting in front of a wall covered in posters while in the foreground two men are sitting in a social setting." that "A woman is sitting alone at a cafe near two men at another table."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The place where has a wall covered in posters and has people sitting isn't necessarily a cafe. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A woman with long brown hair sits alone in a bar." can we conclude that "A woman with long brown hair is lonely."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The woman sitting alone in a bar does not imply she is lonely.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "People in yellow hats climbing a latter."\nHypothesis: "People in hard hats climb a ladder."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
People in yellow hats does not imply they are in hard hats.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A boy on a skateboard is riding on a slope."\nHypothesis: "A skateboarder is riding on a slope to get ready to attempt a jump."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The boy on skateboard on a slope does not imply he is getting ready to jump. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A boy skateboards on a ramp." is it true that "A boy is practicing for a skateboard competition."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The boy skateboarding on ramp does not imply he is practicing for a competition.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A smiling woman and four young children." can we conclude that "Posing for a picture."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The woman is yelling at her kids to sit still for the picture.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A mother and her children pose for the camera."\nHypothesis: "The people have their backs turned to the camera."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Typically if you pose for the camera you would not have your back turned.
The final answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A white male in a green shirt and brown pants is jumping in the air with his arms extended and his legs pulled up on a pile of rocks in the middle of a grassy field on a sunny day."\nHypothesis: "The guy hurt his feet on the pile of rocks out in the field."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The male jumping in air with his legs pulled on pile of rock does not imply he got hurt. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Two teenagers huddle in a doorway in the rain." can we conclude that "People huddle in a doorway to stay out of the rain in seattle."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Two teenagers huddling in the rain does not imply the rain is in Seattle.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man wearing a green striped shirt while jumping up onto a mountain."\nHypothesis: "A man jumps onto a mountain."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A mam jumps onto a mountain is a part of sentence 1. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Two people wearing hoodies huddle on a doorstep in the rain."\nHypothesis: "Two people huddle in the rain outside."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
People can huddle in a rain only when they are outside.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] If "Two young adults holding each other in front of a door." does that mean that "There are some people who are touching each other."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Two young adults holding each other means they are touching each other. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A couple sitting on the concrete outside a set of big brown wooden doors."\nHypothesis: "Couple is waiting on food."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The couple sitting outside foes not imply they are waiting on food.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A woman in a striped shirt and glasses is walking in the city in front of a younger woman with a pink hat and red blouse."\nHypothesis: "The woman is middle aged."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A woman nor a younger woman does not mean middle aged.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A man in denim overalls rides a segway down a city sidewalk." that "A man in overalls rides a segway down a city sidewalk."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A man in denim overalls rides a Segway down a city sidewalk is a rephrasing of A man in overalls rides a Segway down a city sidewalk. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Two young children sit on top of a deer statue."\nHypothesis: "Two children are seated."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The children sit on top of a statue which implies they are seated. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A small child sucks his thumb while sleeping with a pink blanket on a multicolored seat."\nHypothesis: "The child sucks his thumb during a bad dream."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A small child sucks his thumb does not mean during a bad dream. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A young boy wearing a dark blue hat sleeps on a bench at a terminal."\nHypothesis: "The boy is taking a nap before his train arrives."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A young boy sleeps on a bench at a terminal does not mean before his train arrives. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man is handling heavy machinery."\nHypothesis: "A man is wearing a construction hat and steel toed boots."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
People can handle heavy machinery without wearing a construction hat and steel toed boots.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A little girt wearing a yellow bracelet and yellow socks with shin guards kicks a bright pink soccer ball."\nHypothesis: "A girl kicks a pinck soccer ball."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A girl kicks a pink soccer ball is the same as a girl kicks a pink soccer ball. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A dark-skinned man tending to the merchandise of his shop."\nHypothesis: "A man is selling special herbs and spices in his apothecary shop."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A person can be tending to the merchandise of his shop without selling it. Not all merchandise is special herbs and spices.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "An older man speaks to an older woman in fairway grocery store."\nHypothesis: "The man would like to get the woman's phone number."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Just because man speaks to a woman does not mean he would like to get the woman's phone number.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "An overweight individual is leaning over a market counter." can we conclude that "A fat person wearing a backpack leans on a maret counter."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Not all overweight people are fat. The fact that a person is in a market doesn't imply they are wearing a backpack.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "An old man in a brown jacket with white hair and a beard talks to an old woman."\nHypothesis: "Two elders share a conversation."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Two people can talk to each other without sharing a conversation.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "An older couple are standing by a fairway shopping cart." can we conclude that "A young child walks a dog."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Older couple and young child are from two different age group. The answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Four young people are standing in a run down alleyway posing for a picture."\nHypothesis: "People are posing for a picture."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Standing and posing for a picture are the same thing. the words both suggest the people are not moving for a photography. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "Five children ride an amusement park ride." is it true that "Five children sit outside of an amusement park."?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] One cannot ride the amusement park ride while being outside of the amusement park. So the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A little girl in a jacket rides her bike by a lake." is it true that "The girl is reading a book."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A girl that rides her bike cannot be reading a book at the same time.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "Two women are walking past are cafe."\nHypothesis: "The men are running into the cafe."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Walking is a different action and running. Women and men are two different genders. So, the answer is no.


[User] If "A man and his dogs enjoying the lake from the dock." does that mean that "The dogs and men are inside the small hotel room."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Man is a single person whereas men indicates more a than one person.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "Man plays fetch with his dog near a boat dock." that "A woman plays with her cat."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A woman can not play with her cat when its a man playing with his dog.
The answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "A woman and her dog on a leash." is it true that "The woman has a cat on a leash."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The woman can not have a cat on a leash when she has a dog on a leash. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "A boy busy concentrating on using a power-drill." that "Boy using a power drill."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A boy is using a power drill implies he is busy doing it.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A girl kicking her leg up to the shoulder of a woman standing next to her." is it true that "Two men wrestle on the floor."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A girl kicking is very different then having two men wrestle.
The answer: no.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A young boy jumping into a lake." that "A young boy is outside near water."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A lake is a water and the boy jumping into a lake means that he is outside near the water. The answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A young boy jumping into a still lake." is it true that "The young boy is in the pool."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The young boy can not be jumping in a lake and be in a pool at the same time. So the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: If "A young boy jumps off of a plank into a lake." does that mean that "A young boy jumps into a lake."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The boy jumps off a plank into a lake therefore he must go into the lake.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "The young boy in the blue shirt is jumping into the water." is it true that "A boy is wearing a shirt."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A young boy is a type of a boy and blue shirt is a type of a shirt. So the answer is yes.


[User] If "A musician plays a hello kitty electric guitar." does that mean that "A man is playing bach on the piano."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A musician can not play piano and guitar at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A guitarist playing an electric guitar with hello kitty on the front."\nHypothesis: "The guitarist is clapping."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The guitarist can not play guitar and clap at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A long-haired man stands at a microphone playing a pink hello kitty guitar."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man performing a concert for his kids." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Just because a long-haired man stands at a microphone playing a pink Hello Kitty guitar does not mean that the man is performing a concert for his kids. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A man rides a purple bike with a small child."\nHypothesis: "The men was riding the child to the park."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Riding a bike with a child does not imply they are going to the park.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A man biking with a baby."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man sits on the couch with his baby." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The man can not sit on his couch and biking at the same time. The answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A little boy in a beige outfit." that "A child is wearing beige."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Being in a outfit is same as wearing a a being. Final answer: yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "A boy sits in his seat." can we conclude that "A boy sitting down."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A boy sits in his seat means he is sitting down. The answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: If "Large gathering of people for the launch of hot air balloons." does that mean that "Hot air balloons are attracting a crowd outdoors."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The large gathering might have all been relatives instead of a random crowd that was getting attracted to the event.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A person is holding two newborn puppies." is it true that "A person holding two kittens."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A person can not hold two puppies and two kittens at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User]
Can we conclude from "Three young men and 1 young lady are protesting about the exploitation of young workers." that "Three young men and 1 young lady outside of the building that exploits young people."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] People can protest the exploitation of young workers without being outside of the building that exploits young people. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A lot of people doing different activities on a large street."\nHypothesis: "Some peoples are preparing lunch."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A lot of people is more than some people. Usually people do not preparing lunch on a large street. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A group of people walking or bicycling in the middle of a street."\nHypothesis: "The streets seemed to be deserted."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A street can not have a group of people and seemed to be deserted at the same time. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Three people prepare a table full of food with a police car in the background."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A group of cops are beating a criminal." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Usually cops do not beating a criminal while people prepare a table full of food.
The answer: no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Little boy holding his head while looking at car crash wreck outside."\nHypothesis: "A little boy is walking to school."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Little boy can not be walking to school and looking outside at the same time. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A child is in a junkyard will a demolished vehicle." is it true that "A child is on the plaground."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A child can not be in a junkyard and playground at the same time. So the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A fencing competition with two participants is ongoing."\nHypothesis: "As one participant thrusts and the other jumps back to avoid the blow."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A fencing competition is happening as one lunges toward the other.
Therefore, the answer is yes.