[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man in a black leather vest holding his belt as a crowd watches."\nHypothesis: "The man is a stripper."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A man can wear a leather vest without being a stripper.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A street performer being watched by people passing through."\nHypothesis: "A street performer is having a show outside."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Having a show outside entails that it would be watched by people passing through. Final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A woman is throwing arrows at a target."\nHypothesis: "A woman is throwing something towards the target."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Something is a more general word used to replace arrows which are headed toward a target.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A woman in a bandanna throws an arrow at a carrot-shaped target leaning against a hill."\nHypothesis: "Woman throws arrow."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Woman throws arrow is a rephrasing of a woman in a bandanna throws an arrow.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "A woman wearing green pants spraying water on her chevy van." that "A woman is spraying water."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A woman spraying water on her van must be spraying water.
The answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A chubby woman is using a jet spray to wash an auto with new york plates and a breast cancer magnet."\nHypothesis: "A chubby woman is using a jet spray to wash an auto."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A chubby woman is using a jet spray to wash an auto with New York plates and a breast cancer magnet can be written as a chubby woman is using a jet spray to wash an auto. Final answer: yes.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "One man without a shirt and a man with a hat steering are in a small boat."\nHypothesis: "The man is punching the other man."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The man punching other can not be in a small boat. So the final answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Participant walk in a breast cancer relay by a port."\nHypothesis: "A person is at the doctors getting a physical."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The participant cannot be by a port and at the doctors simultaneously. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A large group of people are walking for a cause." is it true that "A group of children walks."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A group of people does not imply a group of children. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A person is holding a baby in yellow." that "The person is the baby's parent."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Holding a baby does not imply to be the baby's parents.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: If "A young child sitting in a mess of paint spilled everywhere." does that mean that "A young child is nice and clean and ready for bed."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Sitting in a mess and nice and clean and ready for bed are different things. So the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A child covered with paint sits amid trays of multicolored paint on a surface thoroughly saturated with paint." is it true that "The child is painting."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A child is painting when they have trays of paint and a canvas they have saturated with it.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Denny asked: If "A little girl in a white shirt has been playing with paint and covered herself and her room." does that mean that "The little girl has painted the room."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Little girl playing with paint that has covered her room with it; painted it.
The answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A man crouches and observes a komodo dragon."\nHypothesis: "A man is resting and watching an animal."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man crouches is inferred as A man is resting and observes a Komodo dragon is inferred as watching an animal.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "A child plays with paint." that "A child sleeps on the couch."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A child cannot sleeps on the couch and play with paint at the same time. So the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A dog plays with a soccer ball." is it true that "The dog is sleeping."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A dog cannot be playing and sleeping at the same time.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] If "Many people with life jackets on are getting into boats on an icy river." does that mean that "The boats crashed and the people couldn't get on them."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] If the boats crashed and people couldn't get on then there would not be many people getting into boats. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A gray dog is bouncing a soccer ball on his head in a grass field."\nHypothesis: "The dog's owner is teaching the dog tricks."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The dog's owner may not be present. Maybe the dog already knows the trick and is not currently being trained. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "An african woman with piercings."\nHypothesis: "Lots of necklaces and corn on her head."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The corn the woman wears is milled and in a bag.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A cute little kid with a little green price sticker on his nose." is it true that "A kid has a sticker on his nose."?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A cute little kid is a way of describing a kid. So the final answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A young child has a green$ 5 tag stuck to his nose."\nHypothesis: "The tag is in the child's pocket."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
When the tag is in the pocket it cannot be on the child's nose.
The answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Man screaming at the top of a sand dune."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is screaming for help." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Just because man screaming does not mean he is screaming for help.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A young girl wearing a dress is hula hooping in the grass."\nHypothesis: "The young girl's dress is blue."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The color of the girl wearing a dress has not been imply to being blue.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A little dark-haired girl in a blue dress is playing with a pink hula hoop." does that mean that "The girl is playing outside."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
She is not necessarily play outside because she is playing with a hula hoop.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "An old man is standing in front of an ad on the sidewalk."\nHypothesis: "An man is standing in front of an ad on the sidewalk."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] An old man is a man as part of his description on the sidewalk. Final answer: yes.


[User] Given the sentence "An older lady is sitting next to a bookshelf while trying to entertain a young child." is it true that "The lady is sitting down."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Sitting next to a bookshelf means the lady is sitting down. Final answer: yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "The child is watching the elderly women put something on her head."\nHypothesis: "The child watches his grandma put her hat on."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Something on her head is not necessarily put her hat on and elderly women is not necessarily grandma. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "The girl is playing with her dog in her driveway." that "The girl is playing fetch with her dog."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The girl might be wrestling with her dog and not playing fetch. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A skateboarder is balancing on a brick wall." is it true that "A kid learning how to skateboard."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The skateboarder could be any age. The skateboarder could be experienced and not necessarily a kid learning how to skateboard.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A boy performing tricks on a brick wall with a skateboard."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A boy riding a skateboard." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Performing tricks with a skateboard implies that he is riding a skateboard.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A dog corners a little girl next to a police cruiser." can we conclude that "The little girl is being attacked by the dog."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The dog could be coming over to play with her and is not necessarily going to be attacked by the dog.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "People are in a room practicing a martial art."\nHypothesis: "People are in the middle of a martial arts class."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Practicing a martial art in a room together implies that they are in the middle of a martial arts class. Final answer: yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A big brown dog runs with a stick in his mouth."\nHypothesis: "And a big black down runs behind him."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A small dog runs with a stick of dynamite in his mouth. So the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A girl playing with a dog near a police car."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The girl is by a police car." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Being by a police car is to be near a police car. So the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A group of bicycle riders in a street race are dressed in all different colors." can we conclude that "A group of cyclists are racing downhill."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The cyclists racing does not necessarily mean they are going downhill. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A group of cyclists riding up a street with a crowd cheering them on." does that mean that "The cyclists are competing in a race."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A group of cyclists riding on the street does not mean that they are in a race. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "Para-olympians representing south africa in track and field celebrate after a race." that "Disabled olympic athletes celebrate together after winning a sprint."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The race that the athletes are participating in is not necessarily a sprint.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A group of south african runners pose at the paralympics." is it true that "The runners are being interviewed after the race has finished."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Being interviewed is hard to do while posing for a photo.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "This team of south african athletes have disabilities."\nHypothesis: "The team has athletes without legs."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The team of athletes with disabilities does not imply that they are without legs.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "A group of four runners stand for a photo at a track." that "A team of runners stand for a photo at the track."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Being in a group of four runners does not mean they are a team.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "The young ladie takes a goalie kick during a soccer match." is it true that "The young ladie takes a goalie kick while thousands of fans scream in the background."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Taking a goalie kick does not mean that fans are screaming in the background simultaneously. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A female kicking a soccer ball while in front of a soccer goal."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The woman is a professional soccer player." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A female does not have to be a professional or a woman to play soccer. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A goalie in a red uniform kicks at the soccer ball to protect the goal." does that mean that "A woman kicking  another woman."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Kicking another woman means that she is not kicking the soccer ball. Final answer: no.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A young woman wearing a red shirt stands in a soccer goal and kicks a ball."\nHypothesis: "A young woman is playing basketball."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] In a soccer game the target is to make a goal by kicking the ball and in a basketball the target is to make a goal by dropping the ball into the basket with the ball keeping in hands. So the final answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "Man in suede jacket plays the electric guitar." that "The man is playing a saxophone."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A guitar is a musical instrument which is played using hands but a saxophone is played with mouth. So, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A man in a brown leather jacket plays guitar."\nHypothesis: "A woman in a brown leather jacket plays guitar."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Man refers to a male and is opposite to woman which refers to a female. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] If "A woman yells into a microphone while wearing a red jacket." does that mean that "A woman whispers  to her friend while wearing a blue jacket."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Yells refers to convey message to a person in a shouting way but whispers refers to convey message to a person in a secret way. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A man wearing pads on his limbs is being bitten by a dog." that "A dog attacks a man."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A dog attacks a man who is wearing pads on his limbs. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A guy jumping off a dock into a body of water." is it true that "A man is jumping of a dock into a big yellow inner tube."?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Jumping into a body of water does not imply jumping into a big yellow inner tube. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "Two men in wetsuits are surfing along the edge of a large wave." that "The men surf on a large wave."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Two men are surfing along the edge of a large wave.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A group of people are conversing with one another."\nHypothesis: "A person watching tv."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A group implies more than on as a person is singular. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two dogs are being led into a building on leashes."\nHypothesis: "Two dogs are running into an apartment building."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] If the dogs are being led the cannot be running freely. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Sumo wrestlers pushing against each other."\nHypothesis: "Wrestlers push each other."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The wrestlers pushing against each other means they are pushing each other.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A brown dog is sniffing a white dog in front of 2 women."\nHypothesis: "Two dogs are running together outdoors."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The dogs cannot be sniffing each other and running together at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two people are sumo wrestling."\nHypothesis: "The people are flying a plane."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] You cannot be flying a plane and be busy with sumo wrestling. So the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "Man in black with one foot on top of a ladder and arms performing a task on a storefront." that "A man sits on a bench."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
You cannot sit on a bench and stand on a ladder at the same time.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "Pedestrians and a bicyclist leisurely move past a modern building."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A bicyclist moves slowly among a crowd of tourists viewing the architecture." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Not all pedestrians are tourists. Not all pedestrians are viewing the architecture. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "People walking and riding bikes on the sidewalk." does that mean that "The people are annoyed with each other."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Not all people walking on sidewalk are necessarily be annoyed with each other. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A man trains a dog to attack." is it true that "A person is teaching an animal."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A man is a person. Trains is the same as teaching. A dog is an animal. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A team throws a teammate in the air." is it true that "A group are performing for a crowd."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Throws a teammate in the air does not necessarily mean performing for a crowd.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Three men wearing canadian military fatigues and a fourth man wearing blue shorts and a red t-shirt stand side-by-side; two men hold shears for a ribbon cutting." can we conclude that "A man ushers 3 military men towards entering a newly built building."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The presence of a man near three men in military fatigues is not enough to infer that the man ushers the three men. A ribbon cutting can be for any purpose and doesn't have to be for a newly built building.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Three men in camouflage clothing and another man in a hat and red shirt and blue shorts standing in front of a building."\nHypothesis: "The three men in camouflage are lying on the floor of a hotel room while the man in a hat jumps on the bed."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Man in a hat is standing in front of a building or jumps on the bed.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Three men in military uniforms and one man in a shirt that says ""canada"" are cutting a ribbon."\nHypothesis: "People are celebrating something in canada."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Men in uniforms and a Canada hat doesn't imply they are celebrating. Wearing a hat that says Canada does not imply they are located in Canada. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "An adult man is throwing a child into the air at a beach while another child watches." can we conclude that "A dad is playing with his baby at the beach."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] An adult man throwing a child in the air can be assumed to be a dad. Throwing his child is playing. So he's playing with his baby. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "Three females in belly dancing outfits raise their arms at conclusion of an activity." is it true that "The women move in unison."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The women move in unison as they finish their activity. It can be inferred the women are concluding a dance routine.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A group of three belly dancers is taking a bow." can we conclude that "The dancers are preparing to go on stage."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Taking a bow implies the end of the show while preparing to go implies they haven't begin to perform. So, the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A white dog runs toward the camera."\nHypothesis: "A white dog is eating his dinner."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A dog cannot be eating dinner while he runs toward the camera.
The final answer: no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A kickboxer lands a flying knee into the face of his opponent." that "A man is drinking water after a football game."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The man cannot be drinking and landing a flying knee simultaneously. Kickboxer does not play football.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "Man in a white shirt kneeing a man in a black shirt in the face."\nHypothesis: "Two men are fighting over a women."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Kneeing a man does not necessarily mean they are fighting over a women.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A man in athletic gear is jumping and kneeing another man in the head and chest." can we conclude that "The men are in a competition."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Jumping and kneeing another man does not necessarily mean in a competition.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man playing a guitar while standing in front of a microphone singing."\nHypothesis: "The man plays a trombone."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The man cannot be playing a trombone and guitar at the same time. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A man sings into a microphone while playing a guitar."\nHypothesis: "A man eating dinner."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man that sings into a microphone is not likely to be eating dinner.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Given the sentence "A muddy person rides his bike through a course." can we conclude that "A person in a shiny white suit jumps a motorcycle over 20 cars."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A person that is muddy is not likely to be in a shiny white suit. The answer is no.


[User] If "This person is driving a boat on a secluded beach." does that mean that "The person owns the boat."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The person who owns the boat is not necessarily the driving it.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A person in a raincoat stands in a boat going across the water."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A person is wearing a raincoat to keep dry." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A person in a boar wears a raincoat to stay dry. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A woman works in a flower garden." that "A woman is working in a steel factory."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] One can be working either in a flower garden or in a steel factory. The answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A woman in gray looking forward."\nHypothesis: "The lady is looking at her smashed car."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
One can be looking either forward or at one's smashed car.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A focused young girl performs her routine on the balance beam."\nHypothesis: "A girl in the olympics doing gymnastics."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The girl might not be in the Olympics nor be doing gymnastics.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Two older men sitting on scooters in front of a koffee cafe."\nHypothesis: "The men are racing their scooters down a steep hill at top speeds!."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Ones can be either sitting on scooters in front of cafe or racing the scooters. So the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "Two men on scooters pass each other on the road and make conversation." that "The two men went to school together."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
There's no way of knowing that the men went to school together.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Two elderly gentleman sitting in scooters talking to one another."\nHypothesis: "Two elderly men are riding their scooters."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
There's no way in knowing whether or not the men are riding their scooters.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A little boy in the bowling alley jumping for joy and another boy running."\nHypothesis: "As an adult watching with amazement."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] One boy is sleeping and the other boy is watching television. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Asian man and his two male children trying to teach his children how to bowl."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Males are bowling." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The Asian man and his male children are all men who are bowling. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: If "Man with dress and cane standing on sidewalk." does that mean that "The man is inside at a diner."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The man is either standing on sidewalk or inside at a diner.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A man and a woman are seen through the fence seated at a table."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Staring into each other's eyes." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A couple are staring at each other across from a fence.
The answer: yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A group of people in jobbing clothes go up a street while bystanders watch."\nHypothesis: "The people are outside."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Going up a street while bystanders watch implies that the people are outside. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Soccer players are talking with each other while standing on a soccer field."\nHypothesis: "Players not talking with each other because they are mad."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Players either talking with each other or not talking with each other because they are mad. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Three asian people standing on a sidewalk with a street scene in the background."\nHypothesis: "Three asian people are sitting down inside eating food at a restaurant."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The three Asian people are either standing on a sidewalk or sitting down inside eating food at a restaurant.
The final answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Two men are rollerskating on a sidewalk."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two men are rollerskating." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] They say the same thing only in the first sentence Two is properly capitalized. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A little girl is walking along a line of logs on a sandy beach."\nHypothesis: "The little girl runs into the woods."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The little girl either walking along a line of logs on a sandy beach or runs into the woods.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A blond girl is stepping on vertical logs in the sand." can we conclude that "A blond girl is sitting on her porch."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Person sitting on a porch can not be stepping on sand at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "Surrounded by 5 other people in a room." that "A woman with raised hands smiles as a balanced tapered jenga tower sits on the table in front of her."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The woman is balancing glasses on top of each other as others look on. So the answer is no.


[User]
Given the sentence "A laughing woman prepares to carefully remove a jenga block from its teetering tower." can we conclude that "The family laughs after dinner."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A single laughing woman cannot be an entire family. One cannot carefully remove an item while laughing. The answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A lady has stacked jenga blocks tower that is hardly standing up."\nHypothesis: "A woman is building a jenga stack in order to pay for school because a man is watching her play jenga and paying her by the hour while he eats cheeseburgers."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The phrase has stacked implies a past action while building implies a current action. So the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A college group of students playing a game of jenga." is it true that "A group of aliens is playing chess."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] College students are not aliens. They cannot play Jenga and chess at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "A group of students playing jenga in a classroom." can we conclude that "Group of students playing class room."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Playing class room is completely different from playing Jenga in a classroom. Final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A man and a woman wait to cross a street."\nHypothesis: "Two dogs wait to cross the street."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A man and a woman mean that the two individuals are people and not dogs. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
If "A blond child in a jacket is sitting at the top of a slide at a playground." does that mean that "A kid is at the playground."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A blond child is wearing a jacket sitting on top of the slide at the playground. The answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A baby is sitting on a blue slide."\nHypothesis: "A baby is in her crib."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A baby cannot be both on a blue slide (outside) and in her crib (inside).
The answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A woman in a blue t-shirt and jeans is sweeping concrete."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A woman is sweeping concrete." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The woman who is sweeping concrete is a subset of a woman in certain clothes sweeping concrete. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A little blond boy and a young woman in jeans walk through a plaza." can we conclude that "The young boy and woman are standing in the snow at the bottom of a ski slope."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Walking and standing are mutually exclusive activities. Plazas are urban locations whereas the bottom of a ski slope is a rural location. Final answer: no.


[User]
Premise: "A woman walks and a little boy walks to the side of her."\nHypothesis: "The mother and son are walking on the sidewalk."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] There are other places they could be walking besides on the sidewalk. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A toddler boy in a red tank top and khaki shorts walks on the european street with a woman in a white top and faded blue jeans." can we conclude that "The woman has a 10 foot long arm."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A woman with a 10 food long arm could not comfortably walk.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Individuals are building a house."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A construction crew is demolishing a house." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Individuals cannot be building a house and demolishing a house simultaneously.
The answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "A man with long hair plays a guitar." can we conclude that "A man playing a song he just wrote on a guitar."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A man plays a guitar does not imply he man just wrote the song. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man is playing a game with toy soldiers."\nHypothesis: "A man is using figurines."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A man is using figurines implies that he is playing a game.
The answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A man with dreads and a guitar."\nHypothesis: "Is clapping while performing on stage."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A man doesn't know how to play guitar so he claps instead. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A musician with dreadlocks is preparing to play a guitar with a band."\nHypothesis: "A guitar is playing itself near a musician."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A guitar cannot be playing itself while a musician is preparing to play simultaneously. Final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "Actors in costumes rehearsing for a play." can we conclude that "While a man with black hair and a white shirt sits on a stairway."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Actors are practicing their parts in a Shakespeare play while the director looks on.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Many people are sitting around computers." is it true that "A group is around technology."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A group is consisted of many people. Another way to state computers is technology.
The answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "Men and women in traditional dresses attending something."\nHypothesis: "The people are scuba diving in the middle of the ocean."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
People cannot be attending something while they are scuba diving in the ocean.
The final answer: no.


[User] Can we conclude from "People at an affair outside under a tent." that "The crowd gathers underneath the large tent."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
If a large number of people are at an affair they gather there.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A female performer is barefoot and performing in front of a crowd." can we conclude that "She isnt wearing any shoes."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A female performer is performing with no shoes on in front of people.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "Many people are gathered under a large white tent for an event." is it true that "The people were outside celebrating."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Being gathered under a large tent does not mean they are celebrating.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A woman wearing a scarf stands near the water and looks down."\nHypothesis: "A woman is taking a taxi to work."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
One cannot stand at water and take a taxi at the same time.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A woman and a man is standing beside water in front of buildings."\nHypothesis: "Couple standing in front of a building."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The couple does not have to be a man and a woman. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man and a woman at the waterfront."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man and woman are lounging on a beach." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Being at the waterfront does not mean they are on a beach.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A woman holding a black leash and a man looking down." can we conclude that "The woman is holding a leash."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
There was a woman holding a leash and there was also a man was looking down.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Premise: "A man dressed in black is bowling in an attempt to knock down the last pin at a bowling alley."\nHypothesis: "He misses the pin."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Making an attempt at knocking down the pin does not mean the man misses the pin. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "Girl hanging upside down with city in the background." is it true that "Girl playing on a jungle gym in a city."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The city is either in the background or in a city. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A man selects a food item from a buffet table while a couple sits in the background."\nHypothesis: "A man is picking food."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Someone who selects a food item is picking food to eat.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A man sends a bowling ball down the lane to pick up the last pin of a spare."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man sends a ball down the lane to pick up the last pin of a spare." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man who sends a bowling ball down the lane to hit a pin does just that.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "An old man is sitting next to a drawing of himself."\nHypothesis: "The drawing is being compared to him."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man sitting next to a drawing of himself is likely comparing the two.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Given the sentence "Man tossing an onion in the kitchen." can we conclude that "A man is in the kitchen."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
He is in the kitchen because he is tossing an onion in the kitchen.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A race car is observed by the crowd."\nHypothesis: "A race car is being watched."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The race car is being watched because the race car is being observed.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Spectators watching white and blue race car passing by."\nHypothesis: "The car is going fast."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The car could be passing by slowly as opposed to fast. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "The blue and white car is in the road."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "With onlookers nearby." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The blue and white car is parked in the parking garage. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A lone blue and white race car about to cross the finish line." that "Two cars are racing."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A lone blue and white car is not two cars. This does not follow.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "Construction workers hard at work."\nHypothesis: "Construction workers having a picnic."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Construction workers cannot be at work and having a picnic simultaneously. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "Man on the roof of a building spraying off the roof." can we conclude that "A man is on the ground floor cleaning."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The man cannot be on the roof and on the ground floor simultaneously.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man in black is cleaning the roof of a building with a jet of water."\nHypothesis: "Bob was cleaning his roof with a jet of water."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] He was cleaning his roof with water because he was cleaning the roof of a building with water. So the final answer is yes.


[User] If "A woman in a white sweater looks at three types of lamps in an art display." does that mean that "While a man with a shaved head looks on in shadow."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A woman in a blue vest waits with her eyes closed while a man looks on in shadow.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A woman is holding her hand to the light as a man watches."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man watches a woman." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A man who watches a woman hold her hand to light does just that. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "A man and a woman posing in front of a fountain." is it true that "A man and a woman posing for a picture in front of a fountain outside."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A man and woman want to take a picture in front of a fountain. The answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A nigerian vendor displays his collection of sunglasses for sale."\nHypothesis: "A vendor displays his knockoff purses."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Sunglasses and purses are not the same type of item for sale. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A homeless man asleep on a sidewalk."\nHypothesis: "There are no people sleeping."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] It is not possible where a man is asleep and also no people are sleeping. So the final answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Four men are in a construction site."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The men are laying on the beach." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The men cannot be in a construction site as well as laying on the beach simultaneously. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Leo: If "A man in black shorts is stretching out his leg." does that mean that "No one is stretching."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
While a man is stretching out his leg it is impossible that no one is stretching.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man practicing a high kick on the cement near the grass."\nHypothesis: "The man is wearing a karate uniform."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A man practicing a kick is not assumed to be wearing a karate uniform. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A young man wearing shorts and no shirt is high kicking as water flies from his clothing." that "The young man swam today."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A man having wet shorts does not mean that they swam that day. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A flock of birds fly away with food in their beaks."\nHypothesis: "Flock of birds fly away."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The fact that a flock of birds fly away with food in their beaks does not imply that flock of birds fly away.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "Seagulls fighting over a scrap of bread." does that mean that "The seagulls are hungry."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The seagulls are hungry because the seagulls are fighting over a scrap of bread.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "Several birds flying in front of trees."\nHypothesis: "Birds are looking for food to eat."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Birds flying in front of trees are not always looking for food to eat. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A toddler wears a red holiday jumper while clutching three pixar toys." can we conclude that "A toddler holding toys."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The toddler is holding toys because the toddler is clutching Pixar toys. Final answer: yes.


[User]
Premise: "A boy in a blue shirt hanging on a rack of clothes."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A funny boy." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Just because boy in a blue shirt hanging on a rack of clothes doesn't mean he is funny. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A skateboarder is perfecting his trick on a wall."\nHypothesis: "A boy is riding a bicycle."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A skateboarder cannot be perfecting a trick while also riding a bicycle at the same time. So, the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "One young males goes for a lay up with another defends him in a game of one-on-one basketball." that "The two people are flying in a hot-air balloon."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Two people cannot be flying in a hot-air balloon while also playing basketball at the same time.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "An ambulance going down the road." can we conclude that "The ambulance has more than one person in it."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Not all ambulances going down the road have more than one person in it. It could well be going to a service station in which case it could only have the driver. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "An ambulance on the street with its lights on at night."\nHypothesis: "An ambulance is parked in a garage for the night."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] An ambulance can't be on the street and in a garage at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "An ambulance parked on the side of a road with its lights on." is it true that "The drivers are busy."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Just because the ambulance is parked at the side of the road with its light on does not mean the drivers are busy. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "An ambulance is on the road at night." is it true that "The ambulance's lights are flashing as it drives down the road."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The ambulance is on the road at night but it could be parked. We do not know if it drives down the road. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: If "A group of people play a card game at a table in a building." does that mean that "People are gathered around a table."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
If there are a group of people at a table then they are gathered around it.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Foursome plays a board or card game seated at a table."\nHypothesis: "The game is a strenuous athletic competition."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A board or card game played seated at a table in not a strenuous athletic competition. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "A group of people sitting around a table playing some kind of board or card game."\nHypothesis: "Some people are writing police reports."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] People can't be writing police reports and playing some kind of board or card game at the same time. The answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Five people of different ages are sitting at the table playing a board game."\nHypothesis: "Five people are playing a game that is located on the table."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A board game is a game that is located or played on the table.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
If "A group of five people play a game." does that mean that "The people are sleeping."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] To be sleeping is not the same as to play a game. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "The black and white dog jumps in the air to catch the white frisbee on the grassy field."\nHypothesis: "The dog jumps in the air to catch the white frisbee on the grassy field."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A dog usually jumps in the air first to catch a Frisbee. Final answer: yes.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A little girl wearing rain boots is jumping off the sidewalk into a puddle of muddy water." can we conclude that "The little girl landed in a muddy water puddle."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The little girl jumped off the sidewalk and then landed in the muddy water puddle.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A man in black is eating a baked good near two elderly men."\nHypothesis: "A man in black is eating a pizza."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man is eating by himself and not with two elderly men.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A kid jumps in a puddle."\nHypothesis: "A kid played in water."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The puddle that he jumps in is a puddle of water. Final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "Five people sitting around a patio table looking up at the photographer and smiling."\nHypothesis: "People are posing for a photographer."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
They are posing for the photographer because they are looking at the photographer and having their picture made.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two children sit inside of a box and have a small hole cut out for a door."\nHypothesis: "Two kids are inside of a box."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The children have cut a small hole in the box to serve as a door.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two adults and two children sitting on rocks for a picture."\nHypothesis: "A group of people are outside."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Two adults and two children are people and sitting on rocks indicates that they are outside.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Two adults and two children pose on a pile of rocks."\nHypothesis: "The children are posing."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The children are posing gives less details than the first sentence.
The answer: yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "Here is a picture of a woman and her husband and child taking a stroll by the parking lot." that "A man is walking by his self near a parking lot."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] It is impossible that a man is walking by his self and also there is a woman and her husband and child simultaneously. So, the answer is no.


[User] If "The young man in the white apron is holding a chicken he has killed and will be processing for food." does that mean that "A man is holding a dead chicken."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Young man is a man. Holding a chicken he has killed implies he is holding a dead chicken. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: If "A girl sitting outside on concrete near water in a black dress." does that mean that "A girl spending a day outdoors."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The girl would be outdoors because she is outside on concrete near water. So the final answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A girl with brown hair sits on the edge of a cement area overlooking water."\nHypothesis: "A girl with brown hair looks at the water."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The girl looks at the water by sitting on a cement area overlooking water.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "An elderly woman with red-hair sitting on a bench with three bags around her."\nHypothesis: "The old lady is resting on the seat."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] An old lady is considered to be an elderly woman who is sitting on a bench which is considered to be a seat. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A red-haired woman in a red blouse with a red bag sits on a bench."\nHypothesis: "A woman sits down on a bench."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A woman sits down on the bench so she can sit on the bench for a period of time.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A woman in red is sitting on a bench."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A person is resting on a chair." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A woman is a person who is sitting to rest on a bench which can function as a chair. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "An old women sitting on a bench."\nHypothesis: "A women is waiting for her husband."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Just because An old women sitting on a bench doesn't mean that is her husband. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A bride and groom smiling and holding hands in the air."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A couple are newly married." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The mention in the first sentence of a bride and groom implies that the couple is newly married. The answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A young boy sits backwards while riding a donkey in an open hilly field." can we conclude that "The boy is riding a donkey in the subway."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A boy riding a donkey in the subway can not be in an open hilly field.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A man works in a bike shop." can we conclude that "The man is an employee of the bike shop."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Just because A man works in a bike shop doesn't mean he is an employee. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "Two people go ice skating in a rink." that "A man and woman go on a first date to the skating rink."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] People does not imply man and woman and go ice skating does not imply it is a first date. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "An older girl helps a younger girl ice skate."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two girls ice skate." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] An older girl and a younger girl indicates two girls ice skate. The answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "Two girls are ice skating with each other." that "Two girls are ice skating in a park."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Just because Two girls are ice skating with each other doesn't mean they are at the park.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A little girl holding hands with her ice skating instructor."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The girl is learning to ice skate." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] If a girl has an instructor then the girl is learning. Final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A large group of people raising their hands at a meeting."\nHypothesis: "There are people sleeping."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
People raising their hands at a meeting can not be sleeping.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A group of woman in red shirts are singing."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Women are singing in a church choir." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A group of women singing doesn't mean they are in a church choir. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Four people are sitting down on the floor and eating."\nHypothesis: "Four people are eating dinner."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Sitting down on the floor and eating does not necessarily mean eating dinner.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "2 couples are eating dinner on the floor behind a large plant."\nHypothesis: "The couples sit on the floor together to eat their meal."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Sit on the floor to eat their meal is a rephrase of eating dinner on the floor. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A man is playing cello as part of an orchestra at a formal performance." is it true that "A man is playing cello."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Playing cello as part of an orchestra is a way of playing cello. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: If "Construction workers in white suits work on a scaffold." does that mean that "Workers are on a scaffold."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Workers that work on a scaffold can not only be looking.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "The boy wearing the blue shirt is running on the grass between the trees." is it true that "The boy is outside."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A boy can run inside a garden can not be outside. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "Construction workers stand on scaffolding to finish the ceiling." is it true that "People are standing."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The people that are standing to finish the ceiling are standing on scaffolding.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Workman on a scaffold are finishing a ceiling of a building."\nHypothesis: "They are standing on a ladder."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The men do not have to be standing on a ladder.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A woman wearing red pants and a pale blue shirt rides her bike across a bridge." is it true that "A woman is riding her bike."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
It is talking about how a woman is riding her bike and where she is riding it.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A woman in a blue shirt is riding a bicycle." can we conclude that "A woman pedals to the grocery store."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Riding a bicycle does not necessarily mean to the grocery store. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "The lady in the blue shirt is riding a bike across a bridge." is it true that "The lady is riding a bike."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
In order for a lady to ride her bike across a bridge she must be riding her bike.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Three people are looking at merchandise of a jewelry kiosk." can we conclude that "The people were shopping."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Looking at merchandise at a jewelry kiosk is a form of shopping. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "Street vendors show their necklaces for sale to three customers." that "The street vendors do not want to sell their good."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
No one can assume that vendors do not want to sell as they are showing their necklaces for sale to customers.
The answer: no.


[User] Can we conclude from "Three people looking at items that a street vendor is selling." that "The people are looking at items."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
In order to look at items a street vendor is selling people must be looking at items.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A young girl exercises on a treadmill."\nHypothesis: "A young girl is trying to stay in shape."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A girl on a treadmill is not always exercising to stay in shape.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A young girl in black is walking on a treadmill."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A girl is working out in her home." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A treadmill can be found in other places besides inside a home. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A child walking on a treadmill inside near a window." can we conclude that "There is a child waking to be in better shape."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Children do not always use a treadmill to get in better shape. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A female toddler gets on the treadmill as she looks at the camera."\nHypothesis: "The toddler is riding her tricycle."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The toddler is either on the treadmill or riding her tricycle. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A girl dressed in a red polka dot dress holds an adults hand while out walking." that "The girl is running while the adults watch."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The girl is either running or walking and being watched or holding hands. Final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "A man in a hat is posing for a photo with a white donkey pulling a wagon." is it true that "A man in a hat is riding a donkey to mexico."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The man is either posing for a photo or riding a donkey.
The final answer: no.


[User] If "An old man holds the leash of a white mule dragging a red cart." does that mean that "The man owns the mule and cart."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Just because he is holding the leash does not mean he owns the mule and cart. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: If "A man stands outside a blue building holding a white helmet." does that mean that "A man is laying in a hammock that is strung between trees in his backyard."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A man that stands outside of a building cannot be laying in a hammock at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "A silly person dressing with a paper mache head is dancing around and looking like they are having fun!." does that mean that "A person having fun."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] People look like they are having fun are usually having fun. So the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A man in black jacket and helmet at his hand poses with a smile." that "A guy smiles and poses for a photo shoot."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The man does not have to be a part of a photo shoot to smile and pose. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A man with a motorcycle helmet stands in front of a row of colorful buildings."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is looking at buildings that are for sale." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Just because he stands in front of a bunch of buildings does not mean he's looking at any that are for sale and nowhere in the first sentence does it indicate they are for sale. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Two people are hiking on a rocky trail through the mountains."\nHypothesis: "While enjoying a trail through the mountains two friends come upon a rocky trail and call for help."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] They might not be enjoying the trail. They could be strangers. No indication they need help. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Two people walking a path on the side of a mountain."\nHypothesis: "The two people were hiking together."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] You can be hiking next to a stranger. You don't have to be together. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Small dog running in the field."\nHypothesis: "A dog chases a rabbit."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Dogs can be running for fun and not chasig a rabbit. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Two people are sitting below the walking sign." is it true that "The people are on a date."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Two people sitting together do not have to be on a date. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Two women sitting under a lit sign on the sidewalk."\nHypothesis: "The women are walking down the street."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The women can't be walking and sitting at the same time. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A man in glasses works behind a kitchenaid selling counter."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A near sided man cleans a counter." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] You can wear glasses and not be near sided. Just because a man works behind a counter does not mean he cleans a counter. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "Men race their bikes on a road."\nHypothesis: "Men in suits are sitting in an office."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Most men are not in suits while they race their bikes. They cannot be sitting in an office and on a road simultaneously. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "The man with the megaphone is protesting."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is protesting about a cause he's passionate about." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] It is not known what the man is protesting. One cannot assume that he is protesting about a cause that he is passionate about. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Three bicyclists race around a curve."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Cyclists without helmets are racing each other." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Cyclists don't have to be without helmets to be racing around a curve.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A young boy looks into the camera as a man in the background perches on the roof of a bamboo house frame." can we conclude that "People look at each other."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
People can be either looking at each other or a boy can be looking into the camera.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A boy looking into the camera and a house being built in the background."\nHypothesis: "A kid looking into the camera lens while workers behind him take a break from building a house."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The house was currently being built which wouldn't happen if you were to take a break at the time.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: If "Rednecks throwing knives." does that mean that "The people are sharpening their knives."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Not all people are rednecks. They cannot be throwing knives while sharpening them.
The answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "This red-haired darling knows how to play those drums."\nHypothesis: "The person is very talented."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
It is not known if the person is very talent just because she knows how to play the drums.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A young male who appears to be in his late 20's or early 30's is smiling while about to bite into a sandwich."\nHypothesis: "The man is dancing."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] One can be either dancing or be about to bite into a sandwich. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "A person is in the ocean in the boat wearing life jacket."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The person is inside a building." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] One cannot be inside a building and in the ocean in the boat simultaneously. The answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Several people are sitting inside a dark art gallery."\nHypothesis: "People are sitting inside an art gallery."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] There is more than two people sitting in a dark art gallery. Final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "Some people are mingling in a room that has photographs all over the walls."\nHypothesis: "The people mingling are on a double date."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
People mingling need not be a double date necessarily. They can be in any conference also.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "Four people in a dimmly lit room with pictures all over the walls and two bright lights are engaging in conversations." does that mean that "A group of people fighting over a football."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Ones cannot be engaging in conversations and fighting over a football simultaneously. So, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A man and two children look at the image on a camera." is it true that "A man and two children just took a picture."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A picture is an image that can be taken using a camera. Final answer: yes.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "People gathered in an artist's studio."\nHypothesis: "People looking at artwork."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] People gathered in an artists studio will be looking at the artwork. So the final answer is yes.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A woman is sitting on the grass and holding two children." that "A woman stirs a pot of beans."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The woman can't be sitting at the same time as she stirs a pot of beans. The answer is no.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A woman wearing jeans and brown flip-flops holding two blond-hair toddler girls wearing pink shorts and shoes." is it true that "The woman is responsible for the two small children."?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] There is a a woman that has two toddler girls she is looking after. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A naked toddler is covering a naked baby with paint."\nHypothesis: "The children are fully clothed."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] You cannot be naked and fully clothed at the same time. So the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A naked baby and toddler are playing with red fingerpaints."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two kids are painting pictures on an easel." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The toddler and naked baby playing with fingerpaints does not imply that they are painting pictures on an easel. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A naked baby and toddler smear each other in paint." does that mean that "The kids are in the bathtub."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The naked baby and toddler smearing each other in paint does not indicate that they are in the bathtub. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A woman wearing a fluorecent safety jacket stands near equipment."\nHypothesis: "A woman got hit by a car."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A woman hit by a car could not be the same woman who stands in a fluorescent safety jacket. So the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Three people are walking outside of a run down red brick building."\nHypothesis: "Three people are sitting on a bench."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Three people can't be walking and sitting at the same time. So the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A woman carrying a red purse in a blue coat walks past a graffiti-ridden brick building."\nHypothesis: "A woman walks through a bad neighborhood."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Graffiti on a brick building does not mean it is a bad neighborhood. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Children walk past a three story abandoned and shuttered brick building."\nHypothesis: "The children are in school."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The children can't walk past a brick building and be in school at the same time.
The final answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Two guitar players play for an audience."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two clarinet players are preforming at a concert hall." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Guitar players who play for an audience can't be performing clarinet at the same time. So the answer is no.


[User] If "Three people walk past a red brick building." does that mean that "Three people walk past a building."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Walking past a red brick building is walking past a building. Final answer: yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Man sings and plays guitar while another man plays guitar behind him."\nHypothesis: "Two men perform as street musicians."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The men could be playing music for many other reasons aside from being street musicians. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man in a blue shirt getting ready to put a cracker in his soup."\nHypothesis: "A man is eating pizza."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The man can't be putting a cracker in his soup and eating pizza at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A girl splashing in a wave at the beach."\nHypothesis: "A girl swimming in the pool."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The beach is a natural place while the pool is man made.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A girl plays on the shore at the beach."\nHypothesis: "The girl is sitting on the couch inside her hotel room."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A girl who plays on the beach cannot be sitting on the couch in her hotel room simultaneously.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A man in a blue shirt and a top hat with goggles is standing over a bowl with a spoon in it."\nHypothesis: "A guy doing something by standing on street."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The man could be many other places besides on the street.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A man with a mustache and black hat holds a small yellow item up to the camera." is it true that "A person holds an item."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
One who holds a small item must be a person who holds an item.
The answer: yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "A gentleman is standing under a tent in front of bowls of some kind of soup." can we conclude that "A man is standing under a tent."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A gentleman is a man. Standing under a tent in front of bowls is standing under a tent. The answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A man with a cowboy hat and blue shirt on is cooking in a festival tent."\nHypothesis: "The man is making chili."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Not all people who cook in a festival are making chili. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Four men are looking at a motor on the back of a wooden boat."\nHypothesis: "A group of men were looking at the boat."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The fact that the men are looking at the motor does not mean they are looking at the boat. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "Four men are looking at the motor of their boat in the river." can we conclude that "A group of men looking at the engine of their boat."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A group of men are probably stalled in their boat on the river and are examining the motor to see what the problem is. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A crowd of people at an outdoor event."\nHypothesis: "A crowd of people are listening to music."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
People gathered outdoors an at event are not necessarily listening to music.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Man throwing stick and dog watching."\nHypothesis: "The man is throwing a stick to the dog."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The man is throwing the stick to the dog that's watching. Final answer: yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A little girl is playing tennis or bad-mitten."\nHypothesis: "The little girl is outside."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A little girl is outside because she is playing tennis or bad-mitten.
The answer: yes.


[User] If "A child wearing a gray sweater holds a crab and looks at it." does that mean that "A child is holding a baby kitten."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The child can't be holding a baby kitten at the same time as she holds a crab. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "Many people are walking around shopping in a brightly lit and colorful shopping mall." that "It's a busy christmas season at the mall."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Just because a shopping mall is brightly lit and colorful does not imply that it is Christmas season.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "People are walking around in a brightly-lit indoor shopping center." that "People are shopping in a store."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] People walking around a shopping center does not mean they are actually shopping in a store. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A taxi going over the bridge with people standing or walking on the bridge." can we conclude that "A taxi parked in a parking lot."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The taxi cannot be both parked in a parking lot and moving over a bridge. Final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "Yellow taxi cab moving across the bridge and huge buildings in the background."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The taxi cab is sitting in the garage with a flat tire." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The taxi cannot be sitting in a garage and moving across the bridge.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A flower girl is posing for a photograph."\nHypothesis: "The little girl is taking a nap."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The girl cannot be taking a nap and posing for a photograph at the same time. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A man and two women dressed in costumes."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "People with nice contumes." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Stating the man and women were dressed in costumes does not necessarily mean they were nice costumes. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A man and two woman dressed like vampires complete with scary makeup." can we conclude that "A man and two women are about to go treat or treating on halloween dressed as vampires."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The man and women are not necessarily treat or treating on Halloween just because they are dressed up.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: If "Two jockeys on horses are racing down a track." does that mean that "Two jockeys in a horse race fighting for first place."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Two jockeys on horses are racing down a track does not indicate that they are fighting for first place. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Some people are eating at a food court." is it true that "People are eating in a food court."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Being at a food court is the same as being in a food court. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: If "A man holding a hard hat wearing an orange shirt looks at the camera." does that mean that "A construction worker notices a photographer."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The presence of a camera does not necessitate the presence of a photographer.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A man in an orange and black shirt holding a helmet."\nHypothesis: "The man is on a motorcycle."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A man in an orange and black shirt holding a helmet does not indicate that he is on a motorcycle.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man wearing a gray shirt and jeans tries to mold some pottery in a room with wooden floors."\nHypothesis: "A boy in a gray shirt and pants smashes the ugly vase he was trying to make on the wood floor of the studio."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Can be either mold some pottery or smashes the ugly vase. Final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "Three young men wearing blue jeans stand in front of a garage while having a conversation."\nHypothesis: "Three guys talking about starting a garage rock band."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Three young men wearing blue jeans stand in front of a garage while having a conversation does not mean that they are talking about starting a garage rock band.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Two young men are standing on the sidewalk talking to each other."\nHypothesis: "Two men are talking to one another."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Two young men and two men refer to the same people. Talking to one another is paraphrasing talking to each other.
The answer: yes.