[User] If "A man in a coat is walking across a city street during a snowstorm." does that mean that "He is in cancun."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
There is seldom reason to wear a coat and even less chance of a snowstorm in Cancun.
The final answer: no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man is crossing a street which is lined by a wall of graffiti."\nHypothesis: "A crossing guard directs traffic."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A crossing guard directing traffic has a stationary position so he cannot be crossing the street.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Given the sentence "A man is walking across the street while it is snowing." is it true that "The sun was extremely warm out as the man walked."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] It can't be snowing if the sun can be described as extremely warm. The answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "The child is looking at a mannequin in a store window."\nHypothesis: "A child is in her crib."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A crib is located in a bedroom so the child cannot be looking at a mannequin in a store window. Final answer: no.


[User] If "A little girl is looking at a mannequin in a window." does that mean that "A girl tackles a mannequin through a window."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A girl cannot be looking at something and tackle something at the same time.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Given the sentence "A cloudy sky above a busy city street." can we conclude that "A clear sky above a suburban area."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A busy city street would not be in a suburban area. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A group of teenage boys watch as one of them cuts another boy's hair."\nHypothesis: "Boy getting hair cut by another boy."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] If the teenage boys watch as one of them cuts another boy's hair then a boy is getting his hair cut by another boy. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A dog is jumping to play in the water." can we conclude that "The dog is wet or about to be wet in this picture."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Wet is an action which happens when we play in the water. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A white dog jumps from the grass into water from a hose." is it true that "There's a black dog in the house."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The dog cannot be a white dog and a black dog at the same time. Also the dog cannot be in the house and on the grass. Final answer: no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A spanish looking man is playing an instrument in the street for money."\nHypothesis: "A mexican seeming man is playing a guitar for money in the roadway."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Not every instruments that a men of any ethnicity plays is a guitar.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man wearing a checkered shirt and red apron sits and uses a pottery wheel to make intricate clay pots."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A real live rearview of my kunkle spam." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The two statements describe completely different scenarios. A man who uses a pottery wheel is a different situation to a real live rearview.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A man sculpting a small clay pot on a spinning wheel."\nHypothesis: "A man is using clay."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] If the man is sculpting a clay pot he would be using clay. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "A boy in red shorts rides a yellow bodyboard on a breaking wave." does that mean that "A boy is drowning in the ocean."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A boy that rides a yellow bodyboard cannot be the one drowning in the ocean. So the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A boy surfs on a yellow board across the bright blue wave."\nHypothesis: "A boy plays soccer in a field."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The boy the surfs on a board cannot be the one that plays soccer.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A woman holds a fish up that is connected to her fishing pole."\nHypothesis: "A woman is proud of her 12 pound fish."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Just catching fish does not mean that she is proud of it. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Three men sitting at a bar inside of a restaurant."\nHypothesis: "Three people went to a restaurant."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The people went to a restaurant because they were inside the restaurant. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: If "A group of friends sit down for something to eat." does that mean that "Pals get ready to dine."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Sitting down for something to eat implies getting ready to dine.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "Some patrons at a some sort of diner." is it true that "The patrons are ordering food."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Patrons at a diner do not have to be ordering food. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A child jumping on a tennis court."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The kid is in a bowling alley." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A tennis court and a bowling alley are two different areas for two different sports.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A woman with a brightly lettered bag spelling ""hot"" scratches her head with her back to the camera." can we conclude that "A woman facing away from the camera scratches her head."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Facing away from is a rephrase of with her back to. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A small dog runs through a field." that "The puppy is chasing a ball."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Running through a field doesn't mean the puppy is chasing a ball. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man with a black hat in the middle of a street directing traffic."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is directing traffic after a storm." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man directing traffic doesn't always do so after a storm.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A man clad in metallic armor raises a weapon while mounted on an armor-clad horse with spectators in the background."\nHypothesis: "The man in armor is part of an army invading a country."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
There is no army invading a country if there are spectators in the background watching.
The answer: no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Large suv driving through a large puddle in the forest."\nHypothesis: "A car is about to stop driving after hitting a puddle."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Not everyone who drives through a puddle has to stop driving.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "An old man licks an ice cream cone."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The old man is eating chocolate ice cream." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A man licking an ice cream cone isn't necessarily eating chocolate ice cream. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: If "A four wheel drive car is splashing through puddles on an off road trail." does that mean that "The car is 2 wheel drive."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A car cannot be both a four wheel drive and a 2 wheel drive.
The answer: no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A car splashes through mud and leaves on the forest floor."\nHypothesis: "A car driving through mud headed to work."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Just because a car is driving through mud it doesn't mean the driver is headed to work. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Suv splashing muddy water in a forest."\nHypothesis: "Suv splashing muddy water on a tree."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Just because a SUV is splashing muddy water in a forest it doesn't mean that water landed on a tree. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A guy wearing a red shirt and yellow hat is tasting some ice cream."\nHypothesis: "A man is eating."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A guy is also a man and if he is tasting some ice cream then he is eating.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "An overhead view of a guy rock climbing."\nHypothesis: "The guy is playing the trombone."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The guy rock climbing cannot be playing the trombone same time.
The answer: no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A boy examines a black telescope."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The boy is in the bathroom." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The boy that examines a telescope cannot be in the bathroom.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "Two women have a swim in water by ice capped mountains." that "A couple of women swim in warm water."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] If they swim in water by ice capped mountains the water does not imply warm water. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A person in a mask is lounging on a pile of snow."\nHypothesis: "The person just burglarized a house."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Because he is wearing a mask in the cold does not mean her burglarized a house. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A couple just got married."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A couple at a wedding dancing to their song." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A couple just got married does not imply they are at a wedding dancing to their song. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A woman in a pink hoodie cutting up cheese outside for sandwiches or snacking." that "The woman is making food for a picnic."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A woman cutting up cheese outside for sandwiches or snacking does not imply the woman is making food for a picnic.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "The women are hard at work."\nHypothesis: "Women hard at work modeling."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The women being hard at work does not imply the Women are hard at work modeling.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A crowd of runners have just begun their race." does that mean that "The race is a marathon."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A crowd of runners beginning their race does not imply the race is a marathon. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "Two young ladies in swimsuits stand in the ocean next to some mountains." that "Girls stand in the water."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
If you are standing in the ocean you must be in water.
The final answer: yes.


[User] If "Group of runners leaving the starting line of a race." does that mean that "The runners are starting."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
When runners leave a starting line they are starting the race.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A young american indian is taking part in a dance while wearing a black and red ritual outfit." that "The young woman is compeating agaisnt others."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A young American indian does not imply the person is a young woman. taking part in a dance does not imply competing against others. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A man is playing musical instruments in the field." is it true that "A musician performs in a field."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A man playing musical instruments in a field is a musician performing in a field.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A tuba player dressed in formal attire performs along with his band mates."\nHypothesis: "A banjo player and a trumpet player."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A tuba player is dressed in a superhero costume along with his band mates.
The answer: no.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "The band plays during the outdoor festivity." can we conclude that "An acapella group serenades the prom queen."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A band could not be considered an acapella group because a band uses instruments other than vocals. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Young boy and girl running with water wings on."\nHypothesis: "The children are wet."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Running with water wings on does not necessarily mean are wet.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A little boy and girl in their swimsuits wearing arm floats." can we conclude that "Kids in swimming gear next to a pool at their house."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
In their swimsuits wearing arm floats is not necessarily next to a pool at their house.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A group of people gathered around looking at two men lifting a woman on a wooden seesaw."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A group of people eat cheese sticks." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
One who is eating is usually seated and not gathering around which implies they are walking around.
The answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Dark-skinned individual having a failed high jump attempt." is it true that "The man is at a track meet."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A man having a failed high jump attempt doesn't necessarily mean that it was a track meet. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Man boxing with another man with a referee in the background."\nHypothesis: "A man in red shorts and a man in black shorts box each other."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Either men could be wearing shorts of any color. There is no indication that either man is wearing red shorts or black shorts.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A group of five firefighters standing on a roof checking something out."\nHypothesis: "A bunch of firefighters are looking at something that is exciting."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The firefighters that are standing does not imply that they are looking. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: If "A red airplane that has left behind a trail." does that mean that "An ariplane is going at mach 5 speeds."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Just because the airplane has left behind a trail doesn't indicate that it is traveling at mach 5 speed.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A red biplane in the sky." can we conclude that "With a trail of smoke."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The biplane is making a trail of smoke in the sky. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A red airplane is leaving white smoke behind it."\nHypothesis: "The airplane is landing."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The airplane wouldn't be leaving white smoke behind it if it was landing. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "A woman on skis going up a hill carrying a pine tree."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A woman went downhill on skis." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The woman going up a hill mean the woman could not be going downhill. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A little boy sticks his tongue out for the camera. another boy looks on."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A boy is getting his picture taken." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A boy sticks his tongue out for the camera must be getting his picture taken. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Red versus blue on ice."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Hockey players play on the rink." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The competing colors would not necessarily be hockey players. The ice would not necessarily be in a rink.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Two hockey players are fighting with a referee watches."\nHypothesis: "The referee watches as the hockey player rights each other while drink a can of soda."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The referee would not necessarily be drinking a can of soda.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Two children are playing ice hockey on frozen ground outside."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The children are playing hockey outside." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Children are playing hockey outside is the same as children are playing hockey outside. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A dog in the water while three individuals walk across a rocky footbridge."\nHypothesis: "Someone from the group threw a stick into the water and the dog is chasing it."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
One of the individuals would not have necessarily thrown a stick. The dog would not necessarily be chasing a stick.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "Two kids play hockey on a pond." that "There are kids playing hockey on the pond."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
On a pond and on the pond mean the same thing.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "This helmeted person is doing a stunt on a bicycle outdoors."\nHypothesis: "There is a monkey riding a tricycle inside a tent while others stare in disbelief."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The monkey riding a tricycle contradicts with person doing a stunt on bicycle.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Lifeguards gather at the beach patrol station." can we conclude that "Lifeguards are off duty at the club."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Lifeguards off duty at club contradicts with lifeguards gathering at Beach Patrol Station. So the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A white dog has jumped up in the air to catch a frisbee."\nHypothesis: "The pet is taking a shower."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Obviously the pet cannot be taking a shower and jump in the air to catch a Frisbee at same time. Final answer: no.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "Someone is suspended from electrical wires." can we conclude that "Someone is standing on the ground next to an electric fence."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Standing on the ground is totally contradictory of being suspended from wires.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A dirt bike rider takes an unconventional trail in a rocky area."\nHypothesis: "A new trail is being laid out by a dirt bike rider."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A dirt bike rider who takes an unconventional trail does not necessarily imply rider's new trail is being laid out. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A redheaded woman is sitting in front of a chain link fence and has two men on either side of her."\nHypothesis: "Three people are posing for a picture in front of a chain link fence."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A woman sitting with two men are not necessarily posing for a picture. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Engineers in full bodysuits and gloves are working around metal machines." can we conclude that "Some engineers are building a mechanical prototype."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Just because engineers are wearing their full gear and working with metal machines does not imply they are building a mechanical prototype.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "The men are wearing white suits to protect themselves."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "People dressed is protective suits." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Men wearing suits to protect themselves means they are protective suits. So, the answer is yes.


[User] If "A small girl in a pink shirt and blue jeans is peeping through a window into a house." does that mean that "A girl stares into a house's window."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A girl peeping through a window means she stares into a window. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "People sit near a fire outside." is it true that "People gather around a campfire."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
People sit near a fire means they gather around a campfire.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "One young man with a white t-shirt is punching a bag in a gym while another man watches him." that "He is a professional boxer."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The young man punching a bag in a gym is not to be infer as a professional boxer. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A teenager is punching a punching bag in a gym while another man watches."\nHypothesis: "The man is a trainer."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The man that is watching the teenager punching a punching bag does not infer that he is a trainer. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "The two tan dogs greet each other in the green grass."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A cat and a dog play in the house." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Either the animals are a cat and dog or two tan dogs. Final answer: no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A heavily scarred pitbull attempts to take a playtoy from another pitbull."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A gray pitbull is taking a chew toy from another." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Not all pitbulls are necessarily be gray. Playboy doesn't imply chew toy. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A graying man in a suit is perplexed at a business meeting."\nHypothesis: "His suit is the same color as his hair."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The fact that a graying man in a suit is perplexed at a business meeting doesn't imply that his suit is same color as his hair.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A man in a yellow tie is rubbing the back of his neck."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is rubbing his neck." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A man rubbing the back of his neck rubs his neck.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A man kayaks in wavy water."\nHypothesis: "A man kayaks in water."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A man kayaks in water is the same as a man kayaks in water. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A kayaker traverses some churning rapids." can we conclude that "A person is kayaking on the colorado river."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The person kayaking may be on a different rive than the Colorado river. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A person in a blue kayak battles the waves."\nHypothesis: "A person is in a kayak."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A person in a kayak is a person in a kayak. So the final answer is yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "A man is kayaking in rough water." can we conclude that "A man is kayaking on rapids in a river."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Rapids in a river isn't the only place where rough water can be found. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A small group of people are at a party." that "Ten people left the party."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] They can't be at a party and left the party at the same time. So, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A man and a child going down a water slide."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man and child are sharing a milkshake." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] If they are going down a water slide they cannot be sharing a milkshake. So, the answer is no.


[User]
If "Two people go down a water slide on a raft." does that mean that "The people are sitting at the table."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Two people sitting at a table cannot be going down a water slide. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A man holds up a child while sitting in a pool of water situated on a tarp and grassy field."\nHypothesis: "A man is playing with a dog outside."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A man can either hold up a child while sitting in a pool of water or he is playing with a dog. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "When walking down the street it is rare to encounter a pay phone."\nHypothesis: "A person is walking by a pay phone."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] It is rare to encounter a pay phone does not imply a person is walking by a pay phone. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "Street view of a city featuring a old asian woman walking by a pay phone."\nHypothesis: "The woman is by the phone."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Walking by a pay phone means you are near the phone. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Three people with political signs." is it true that "People are walking along the beach."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] People are unlikely to be carrying political signs at the beach. So the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man in a sweater being offered candy by a child." that "A man offers candy to his elderly mother."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
An elderly mother cannot be a man and a child cannot be a man.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Man riding a bicycle as woman walks beside him on a street."\nHypothesis: "A man carries a woman on his back."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A woman beside a man is not a man carries a woman. Final answer: no.


[User]
Leo: If "A woman with a bag talks to a man on a bicycle near a street." does that mean that "A man talks to a woman on a bike."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A man on a bicycle is not a woman on a bike.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "Little girl in a gym bouncing on a trampoline." that "The girl is playing on a trampoline."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A girl that is bouncing on a trampoline is probably playing on the trampoline.
The answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "Guy in santa suit wearing ninja mask and horns."\nHypothesis: "The man is wearing a elf suit and a dog mask."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The guy can't wear a santa suit with ninja mask and horns and an elf suit and dog mask at the same time.
The final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "A man wearing a santa suit and wrestler's mask poses dramatically." is it true that "Santa isn't real."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A man is in the Santa suit and therefore is real. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Two bicycle taxi (rickshaw) drivers sleeping in the cabs of their vehicles."\nHypothesis: "Some rickshaw drives are trying to pop wheelies in their cehicles."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The rickshaw drivers can either be sleeping or trying to pop wheelies.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Can we conclude from "Four mountaineers are walking on a trail under the moon that is visible in the blue sky." that "The moutaineers are rowing a boat."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The mountaineers can either be walking on a trail or rowing a boat. The answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "An athlete leaping over an obstacle." is it true that "Two men and a group of women are eating hot dogs."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Two men and a group of women are a group of people while an athlete is a single person. One can either be eating or leaping.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A woman is standing by the sink and her face is reflected in the mirror."\nHypothesis: "A woman looks in the mirror."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The woman's face is reflected in the mirror because she looks in it. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "A man hunches over to watch tv in front of a red brick wall." that "A man watches tv."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
If he hunches over to watch the TV he still watches the TV.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A baby girl being taken on a walk with her father in a park." that "A little girl is playing in the sand."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The girl is either being taken for a walk or playing in the sand.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A man walking while holding the hand of a small child." is it true that "A family is walking looking at the window display."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A man walking holding a small child's hand does not imply a family walking looking at a window display. At all.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A crying child and people walking in a park."\nHypothesis: "Parents are trying to stop a child from crying at a park."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] No way to know trying to stop a child from crying. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: If "A black dog with a pink collar is following behind a brown dog with across a grassy field." does that mean that "The black dog is female."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Dog is not necessarily a female because of a pink collar.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A small white and black dog chasing a slightly larger brown dog in a grassy area." can we conclude that "The two dogs are the exact same size."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A small dog and large dog are of different sizes and not of the exact same size. So, the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A guy on a skateboard is doing a stunt at dusk." that "The skateboarder is outdoors."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Dusk happens outdoors so doing a stunt at dusk is a way of being outdoors.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A group of people stand on a street corner." that "The people are standing in a doorway."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The people either stand on a street corner or are standing in a doorway. So the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Here is a picture of people waiting for their turn to cross the street on or for the bus to take them to school or work."\nHypothesis: "People are gathered near a street."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] In order to be waiting to cross the street people must be near a street. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "Two people look up towards a gold statue." that "A gold statue has the attention of two people."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Has the attention of is a rephrase of look up towards.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "Two kids are swinging on a playground." that "Kids are swinging during recess."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Being on a playground does not mean the kids are at recess.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A young child swinging on a swing at a playground."\nHypothesis: "There is a child at a playground."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
There is a child at a playground plays swinging on a swing.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A group of young people stand around waiting for something."\nHypothesis: "A church group is shown waiting for movie tickets."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A group of young people stand around waiting for something does not indicate that a church group is shown waiting for movie tickets.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "People are standing around inside and one of them is wearing a fedora and a striped zip hoodie."\nHypothesis: "Some humans standing."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Some humans standing around inside and one of them is wearing a fedora. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two boys in a wooded area are placing leaves in a clear viewing container."\nHypothesis: "The boys are in a wooded area."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The boys placing leaves in a clear viewing container in wooden area. The answer is yes.


[User]
Student: If "Two kids are experimenting with insects." does that mean that "Two kids are playing a game of flag football."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Can not be experimenting with insects and playing football at the same time. So the final answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A small girl with face paint paints a picture outside."\nHypothesis: "A young girl palying outside."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A small girl and a young girl are not necessarily the same thing. Painting and playing might not be the same thing. So, the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Some type of ceremony or concert is taking place as the photo is being taken from the middle aisle with the audience watches all the different string instruments play with the violinist in black taking center stage."\nHypothesis: "The family waits for their children to perform on stage."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Just because an audience watches all the different string instruments play doesn't mean the family waits for their children to perform on stage. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Two people stand and gaze at a golden statue."\nHypothesis: "Some people are trying to melt the statue with their laser vision."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] People who are gazing at something are not trying to melt the object with their eyes. So the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two children play while being suspended in harnesses."\nHypothesis: "The children are playing at being birds."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] You do not need to be suspended to pretend to be birds. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Girls with baseball gloves walking across a baseball field." can we conclude that "The girls are walking across the field."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Girls walking across a baseball field are also girls walking a cross a field.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A boy slides down an inflatable water slide." is it true that "A boy sits at the top of a water slide."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] One cannot slide down a water slide while he sits at the top. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "The biker is riding down a grassy mountainside."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The biker was out for a ride." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A biker riding down a mountainside is also a biker out for a ride. The answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A young girl in pigtails plays in the sand at a beach." that "A boy feeds fish."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] If he is feeding fish then he would be at the water and not in the sand playing. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "4 women."\nHypothesis: "One child and a black and white dog sit outside at a social event."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] People are sitting outside on a bench at a social event. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Five men are washing windows of alpine style buildings on five ladders."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Men are cleaning the buildings." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Just because Five men are washing windows of alpine style buildings on five ladders doesn't mean they are cleaning. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A tan dog with a black collar on and his master playing around in their free time." does that mean that "The dog likes to play fetch with its owner."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A dog and his master playing does not mean that they are playing fetch. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A skydiver safely lands while another watches from the ground."\nHypothesis: "The skydiver botched his landing."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] If the skydiver landed safely then he would not have botched the landing. Final answer: no.


[User]
Premise: "Two para gliders are practicing their craft in an open field."\nHypothesis: "Two para gliders are training for a big flight."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Practicing their craft does not imply training for a big fight. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Two men with colorful parachutes have just landed in a field."\nHypothesis: "Two men  are getting ready to go home."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Men have just landed in a field does not imply getting ready to go home. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "Two people are landing from their skydiving exercises." can we conclude that "A family of four boarding an airplane."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
People cannot be skydiving and boarding an airplane at the same time.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A female bowler follows through after hurling her bowling ball down the lane."\nHypothesis: "A woman is bowling a perfect game."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Hurling a bowling ball down the lane does not imply bowling a perfect game.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "Professional female bowler practicing form for releasing the ball." can we conclude that "A female bowler prepares to attempt to beat a world record."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Releasing the ball does not imply an attempt to beat a world record. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "The player carefully throws the ball wishing to do a strike in a bowling game." is it true that "A swimmer smiles as she does the breaststroke."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Person who is at a bowling game can not be doing breaststroke at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "A man wearing a red coat stands on the corner near a building." can we conclude that "A man is waiting in a elevator."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A man cannot be waiting in an elevator and standing on the corner near a building. Final answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "4 guys go around a turn in a speed skating competition."\nHypothesis: "The men are sewing curtains."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
People who are at a skating competition can not be sewing curtains at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "Ice skating race is going around a curve." can we conclude that "The racers are competing in the olympics."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Not all Ice skating race going around a curve are competing in the olympics. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Two men in cowboy hats are sitting on a fence."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The two men are sitting on the fence watching cattle." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Not all men in cowboy hats sitting on a fence are watching cattle.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "People are skiing down a snow covered mountain."\nHypothesis: "People are skiing down a snow covered mountain while on vacation at a ski resort."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Not all people skiing down a snow covered mountain are on vacation. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Suprised couple talking to woman." is it true that "Couple talking to a woman about a threesome this evening."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Not all Suprised couple talking to woman are talking about a threesome this evening. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Man on atv is making a large cloud of dust."\nHypothesis: "The man is sitting still."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Either a man riding an ATV in motion is making a large cloud of dust or he is sitting still.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "A quad rider kicking up dust in the jungle."\nHypothesis: "The man is riding in the rain."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The fact that a quad rider kicking up dust in the jungle does not imply that it was in the rain. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "A small string orchestra plays in a church where a crowd looks on." can we conclude that "The music is nice."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A small string orchestra plays in a church where a crowd looks on doesn't imply that the music is nice. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A large brown dog is walking along side a river." does that mean that "The dog is small."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The dog can't be large and small at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two men in white helmets."\nHypothesis: "Standing outside a building."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A mana and a lady sitting in a car outside a building. So the final answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A black dog with white paws is climbing over a rock."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The dog is on a rock." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Climbing over a rock implies the dog is on a rock. So the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A black dog with white paws stands on a large rock in a field." is it true that "A dog is looking for a duck."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Standing on a large rock does not necessarily mean looking for a duck.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A black dog stands on a rock."\nHypothesis: "Green fields behind him."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A black dog stands on a rock looking for its owner. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Two dogs are fighting over a red frisbee outside." can we conclude that "The dogs are debating on who will chase the cat."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The dogs can't be both physically fighting and debating at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "Two younger dogs biting a frisbee playfully." can we conclude that "Dogs catching a frisbee in the air."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Even though two dogs are biting at a frisbee that doesn't mean they are catching it in the air.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "The black dog is climbing on a rock."\nHypothesis: "The dog is climbing on a rock at the ocean."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The black dog is climbing on a rock is not necessary to be near an ocean. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A brown dog and a spotted dog squabble over a dog toy." does that mean that "A dog is brown."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A brown dog is a rephasing of A dog is brown. Final answer: yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "Man with an ice sculpture."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man has carved the ice sculpture." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A man with an ice sculpture hasn't necessarily carved the ice sculpture. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A man walks up to a red and yellow building to pay for gas on a gold but sunny day." does that mean that "A man approaches a blue and green building."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The sentences alter the colors from red and yellow to blue and green. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A man is walking by a diesel refilling station."\nHypothesis: "A man is walking by a diesel refilling station."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A man is walking by a diesel refilling station implies A man is walking by a diesel refilling station.
The answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "Couple take their dog for a walk on the beach."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A couple is in their car." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] You cannot take your dog for a walk on the beach while in your car. Final answer: no.


[User]
Premise: "Picture of a guy at a gas station."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Picture of theif." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] We do not know someone is a theif just by looking at them. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "A man in black shaving a ice sculpture." can we conclude that "A man in yellow is painting a picture."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Black and yellow are two different colors to have on for the same person at the same time. Painting a picture and shaving a ice sculpture are entirely different actions. The answer is no.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "Man does a trick flipping over several people lined up at a street fair." that "A man is robbing a bank."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Man described doing a trick and robbing the bank contradict - incompatible verbs. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A woman sitting and drinking from a cup." is it true that "While a man in the background looks at a laptop computer."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A woman drinking a cup of coffee while her husband reads emails.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A varied group of people are on all fours with a woman laying on top of them; a man is seen attempting to jump or flip over them."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man tries to leap over a group of people on the ground." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A man is trying which is the same as attempting to jump or flip over or leap over a group of people or them meaning group.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "Two wrestlers get down and dirty on the mat in this intense match experience." can we conclude that "The wrestlers are having a tough match experience in the ring and are throwing stuff in the crowd."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Wrestlers getting down and dirty can do so without necessarily throwing stuff in the crowd. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A man in a red jacket and a child with a mohawk dig with shovels at a park near the beach."\nHypothesis: "A man and a child are playing at a beach side park."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A beach side park is an exaple of a park near the beach. The answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "Two boys wearing red jackets are digging shovels into the dirt." that "The smaller boy in the yellow boots has a mohawk."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Two boys wearing red jackets are digging shovels in a sandbox.
The answer: no.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "Five people in clear blue water preparing to scuba dive." is it true that "The people in the water are divers."?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The people must be divers if they are going scuba diving. So the final answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "Two runners are pushing children in strollers."\nHypothesis: "The runners are going somewhere with the children."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Not all two runners pushing children in strollers are going somewhere with the children. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A black dog is walking on the grass with a stick in its mouth." is it true that "The animal is on the grass."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A black dog is an animal. He is walking on the grass.
The answer: yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two men push their children in strollers during a race."\nHypothesis: "The men are competing in a race for charity."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Not all two men pushing their children in strollers during a race are competing in a race for charity.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "The streets of a chinatown look alike are lit with bright colors."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Chinatown streets are brightly lit." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The streets of Chinatown are lit with bright colors so they are brightly lit. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A street show outside with a man holding a blue ball and wearing a red round nose."\nHypothesis: "A man holds a ball outside."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The man is in a street show outside so he must be holding the ball outside.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A contact juggler performing on the street."\nHypothesis: "A juggler pratices in his home."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The juggler is either practicing or performing. His home wouldn't have a street in it. So the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A man riding a bike in front of a building." is it true that "A man is riding in a taxi."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] One cannot ride in a taxi while riding a bike at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User]
Premise: "A girl in a gray shirt is sweeping dust out the front door."\nHypothesis: "The girl is cleaning up the dust from inside."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] If she is sweeping dust out the front door she would have to be inside. The answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Maintenance worker fixing something for somebody."\nHypothesis: "Someone requested the worker fix the broken item."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The fact that a maintenance worker is fixing something doesn't imply someone requested the worker fix the broken item.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A black dog and its reflection are seen near a pond ringed by dry foliage."\nHypothesis: "Dog drinks out of small pond."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Just because a dog and its reflection are seen near a pond doesn't imply dog drinks out of pond. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A young girl in a bikini top is touching a young boy in swimming trunks while getting splashed by water." does that mean that "A girl and boy are wearing swimming gear while splashing in the water."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] While getting splashed by water a girl and a boy were wearing swimming gear. Final answer: yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A young woman wearing glasses blowing smoke."\nHypothesis: "A woman is blowing smoke."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] To safeguard the eyes a woman is wearing glasses while blowing smoke. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A boy and a girl in bathing suits are touching each other." that "They are holding hands."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A boy and a girl touching each other are not necessarily holding hands. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A brunette woman with glasses and a heavy-lidded gaze looks at the camera with smoke in the foreground."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A red-haired woman puts in her contact lenses." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A brunette and red-haired woman have different hair colors and glasses and contact lenses are different sight aids.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A man jumping a sign on his bike."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is doing a stunt by jumping a sign." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A man jumping a sign means he is doing a stunt by jumping a sign. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man on a bicycle is jumping over a sign that says ""free dinner""."\nHypothesis: "A man is checking his mailbox."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The man cannot be checking his mailbox while jumping over a sign. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "An older man sitting on the ground rolling a cigarette."\nHypothesis: "There is a cigarette close to the older man."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] If he is rolling a cigarette then the cigarette would be close to. The answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "A little girl is trying to help a baby put his shoe on." that "A baby is putting on a little girls' shoes for her."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
His is a male pronoun and her is a female one and you cannot be both genders at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "A gymnast stretches on the mat." is it true that "A girl practising her moves on bar."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] If she was doing stretches then she would not be practising her moves. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] If "A group of people climb into a hot air balloon." does that mean that "The hot air balloon is about to launch for the race."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Climb into an air balloon does not imply the balloon is about to watch.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A crowd surrounds a grounded hot air balloon."\nHypothesis: "Crowd at a baseball game."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The crowd isn't at a baseball game if they surround a hot air balloon.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "People gathered around a hot air balloon in the process of inflating."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A group is watching as a hot air balloon fills up." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Hot air balloon fills up is rephrasing hot air balloon inflating.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A group of girls wearing dresses and skirts gathers outside." that "A group of girls are outside."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A group of girls are outside is rephrasing a group of girls gathers outside. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "A man and a blond woman whisper to each other in a bar." is it true that "A man and a woman are close to one another."?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A man and woman must be close to one another in order to whisper. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "Women starting to run a track race." can we conclude that "The women are running this race for a charity."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Women starting to run a track race are not necessarily running this race for a charity. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Two men are hanging out and grilling."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two men are making burgers and hot dogs." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Two men grilling are not necessarily making burgers and hot dogs.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A girl prepares plates for a meal." that "Girl prepares."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
One who prepares plates for a meal is one who prepares.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A woman picking up a couple plates of food from the table." is it true that "The person is picking up plates of pancakes."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A woman picking up plates of food from the table is not necessarily picking up plates of pancakes.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "The larger child will help put on the smaller child's shoes."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The larger child knows how to put on shoes." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] One must know how to put on shoes if one is to help put on shoes. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Two kids playing with a dog."\nHypothesis: "The dog is playing with its yougn owners."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Two kids playing with a dog is not necessarily its yougn owners.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A black dog carries a toy on the grass." does that mean that "Dog with toy on grass."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A dog that carries a toy is a dog with toy. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "A man is asleep sitting up on a plane wearing headphones." that "Man fakes to be asleep to avoid talking to stranger next to him."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A man asleep on a plane wearing headphones is not necessarily to avoid talking to stranger next to him.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "While seated in a plane a man dozes off."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A male has his eyes closed." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Man is a male and when one is dozed off his eyes are closed. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: If "A man is putting in a lighting fixture." does that mean that "He is careful."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The man may not be careful when putting in a lighting fixture.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A group of young men in colorful shirts with their number on them walk down a street."\nHypothesis: "They are camping out in the wilderness."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
They does not have to refer to a group of young men. Camping is not the same as walking. The wilderness is different than a street.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A group of young men are running a race."\nHypothesis: "They are competitive."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A group of men are run in a competitive running race. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "Men are struggling to carry wood down the street."\nHypothesis: "The men have wood upon wood."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] They could carry only one piece of wood and not wood upon wood. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
If "A boy and a girl hidden behind tall weeds of green grass." does that mean that "A girl and her younger brother are playing in a field of tall grass."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The boy may not be the girl's younger brother. The grass may not be a field. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A toddler plays with his wooden toy train set."\nHypothesis: "Toddler being put down for a nap."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
If a toddler plays with a toy train set he is not being put down for a nap.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A man and a child are swimming in a pool." can we conclude that "The man is laying on the grass."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
If a man is swimming in a pool he is not laying on the grass.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A young boy in a green shirt playing with a miniature train on an elevated train track."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A boy playing with a train on the completely flat train track." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A boy might not be young. A completely flat train track is not the same as an elevated train track.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "An old man and his dog are standing otuside with a cart."\nHypothesis: "There is a dog."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] There is a dog implies an old man and his dog are standing otuside with a cart. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "An old man with a large belly is next to a filled shopping cart and a dog on the street." that "The man has all his stuff in the shopping cart with his dog."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The shopping cart might not have all of the man's stuff. The dog might not be in the shopping cart.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A young man wearing a helmet rides a skateboard on a ramp." is it true that "A motorcyclist in a helmet rides by."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A motorcyclist is not necessarily a young man. A motorcyclist would not ride a skateboard. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "Helicopter lands in field with lake in background." can we conclude that "A helicopter is landing."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] When a helicopter lands in a field it is in fact landing. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "A helicopter descends into a grassy area where there are many cars." that "The helicopter descended into the grass."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The helicopter descended into the grass rephrasing a helicopter descends where there are many cars. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A helicopter about to land on the ground in the middle of clearing in the forest." is it true that "The helicopter is flying over the ocean."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The Helicopter flying over the ocean contradicts the helicopter about to land on ground. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A gray-haired person with glasses enjoys a sandwich." can we conclude that "The man is enjoying drinks."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Contradiction between enjoying drinks and enjoying a sandwich in sentence 1. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two older women sit at a table with two coolers in front of them."\nHypothesis: "The old ladies are standing by the pool."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Ladies standing by the pool contradicts against ladies sitting at a table. The answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "An elderly woman is eating a burger while the man next to her touching his hat." that "The couple is happy to be together."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Here the couple here refers to an elderly woman is eating a burger while the man next to her touching his hat.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Women are seated at a picnic table eating."\nHypothesis: "While a man in a white t-shirt and a yellow and orange balloon design on his head stands in the background."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The man in the tractor sprays mud on a group of women.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Here is a picture of a construction crew getting ready to go to work on a skyscraper."\nHypothesis: "The picture was taken recently."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] We don't know it was taken recently or a longer time. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "The girl eating spaghetti is wearing a red jacket." that "A girl wearing a blue jacket refuses to eat any spaghetti."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] If a girl is eating spaghetti she is not refusing to eat it. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A girl messily eats a plate of pasta." that "The girl eats without making a mess."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The girl is either eating messily or she is not making a mess. The answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "The cowboy prepares to lasso the bull."\nHypothesis: "The cowboy is on a movie set filming for brokeback mountain 2."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The cowboy is either preparing to lasso the bull or filming the movie.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Four friends have fun at the beach on a hot day."\nHypothesis: "Four friends build a castle on the beach during a nice day."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Have fun at the beach does not necessarily mean build a castle. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A cowboy is riding a horse whilst spinning a lasso around." that "The cowboy is wearing a cowboy outfit."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Riding a horse does not necessarily mean wearing a cowboy outfit. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A cowboy riding a horse."\nHypothesis: "Swinging a rope above his head."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A cowboy is about to lasso a goat while riding his horse. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A man and woman place birthday candles on a cake."\nHypothesis: "It is the little boy's birthday."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] It is not only the little boy's birthday that birthday candles are placed on the cake. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A crowd of people sitting under a tarp eating."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A small group of people eat inside at a restaurant." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] One must either be under a tarp or inside a restaurant. The answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A british military man is raising his hat." can we conclude that "A british military man sleeping next to a dog."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
If a man is raising his hat he is not sleeping.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A uniformed man standing and cheering while holding his hat in his hands."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man is cheering on his grandson." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A uniformed man standing and cheering while holding his hat in his hands does not indicate that he is cheering on his grandson. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Four children on the floor looking at a camera."\nHypothesis: "The children want to know how the camera works so they can take a picture."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The children are looking at a camera but they don't necessarily want to know how the camera works so they can take a picture.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "Three young men in a crowd watching tennis on a large screen." that "Three friends are watching a tennis game."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The three young men are three friends watching a tennis game. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A man wearing a leopard print jacket sits behind a table covered with books and papers looks at a man wearing a black shirt with white print while the man speaks to him."\nHypothesis: "Three women in the room also listen to the conversation."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The man in the leopard print jacket wants to date the other man. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A snowboarder flips upside down with a snow covered hill in the background."\nHypothesis: "Skiers are sitting around a campfire in the dark."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Skiers sitting around a campfire could not also be a snowboarder that flips upside down.
The answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A train flies bu a man in a olive green officers uniform."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The officer is near the train." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A train goes by a officer in a uniform who is wearing olive green. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Premise: "A bearded older man holds something toward the camera."\nHypothesis: "A man looking in the distance."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Holding something toward a camera does not imply looking in the distance. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Bearded man wearing hat in front of an out of focus background." can we conclude that "The man just finished shaving."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
If a man is bearded he did not just finish shaving.
The answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "The policeman is having note in his hand." can we conclude that "The policeman is having note in his hand and pencil in the other hand."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The policeman could be holding something other than a pencil in his other hand.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "An officer stands next to cars parked on a street."\nHypothesis: "The cop is by the cars to give tickets."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The officer could be standing next to the cars for some other purpose than writing tickets.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "One man is playing the drums while another is singing karaoke."\nHypothesis: "Two people are making music."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Playing drums and singing Karaoke are the same as making music. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A young boy kicks at the autumn leaves beneath his feet."\nHypothesis: "A young boy kicks."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The young boy kicks the leaves because it is by his feet. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A man is sitting on a bench and smoking in front of other people." can we conclude that "A man smokes on a bench."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
There is bench and the man is sitting and smoking on it.
The answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "Many dogs race around the track."\nHypothesis: "Dogs are running fast."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Just because many dogs race around the track does not indicate that they are running fast. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "Two asian elders are playing chinese chess on a bench." that "Two men are having a conversation."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Two men are having a conversation no need to be an Asian elders. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: If "Two older gentlemen playing a game at a bench." does that mean that "There are two older men playing a game outside."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Benches are usually outside. Older men are often referred to as gentlemen.
The answer: yes.


[User] Given the sentence "Two older gentlemen play a game of checkers." can we conclude that "Two men participate in a checker tournament."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
To play a game of checkers does not imply a tournament.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A kangaroo wearing a yellow and black striped vest with the number eight on it is hopping." is it true that "A kangaroo is dressed up for a boxing competition."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A kangaroo wearing a yellow and black vest does not imply being dressed up for a boxing competition.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: If "Race dogs run their fastest down a sandy track." does that mean that "The dogs are large."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The dogs are not necessarily large as they could just as easily be medium or small. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A waiter taking an order at a restaurant." is it true that "A waiter is taking an order for a hamburger at a restaurant."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Taking an order does not imply the order is for a hamburger. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Two dogs are wrestling in a field." can we conclude that "Two dogs are getting bathed."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The dogs cannot be wrestling in a field and getting bathed at the same time. So the answer is no.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A brown dog is grabbing the collar of a black dog."\nHypothesis: "The dogs are in the yard."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A dog grabbing the collar of another does not imply they are in the yard. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man wearing a blue and white plaid shirt is sitting at an outdoor restaurant table."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Looking at a menu while a waiter waits to take his order." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The man is being obnoxious and ordering for his date while she is in the restaurant. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A dark black dog is playing with a light brown dog in a backyard." can we conclude that "Two dogs are playing."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A dark black dog and a light brown dog equals two dogs. Final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A brown dog and a black dog run into each other in the grass."\nHypothesis: "Fat animals running."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The dogs may or may not be fat and just because they run into each other does not necessarily mean they are running.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "A young woman is working behind the counter at a restaurant." does that mean that "A young woman is at work."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A young woman is working so she should be at work. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Children ride their bikes on a street covered in chalk drawings."\nHypothesis: "Children are riding bikes in the street."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The street where the children are riding their bikes are covered in chalk drawings.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A waitress with a red skirt bringing beer." is it true that "She is bringing a beverage."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
She is a waitress wearing a red skirt and the beverage she is bringing is a beer.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A woman carrying a tray with drinks on it." can we conclude that "There are drinks on the tray."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Drinks on the tray implies a there is woman carrying the tray. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A waitress carrying beverages with a red apron." is it true that "The waitres is at work."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A waitress at work implies she is wearing a red apron and carrying beverages. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A bronze statue of a man hanging on an extended pole in the air by one hand."\nHypothesis: "The man was eating beans and gravy."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
If he was hanging on a pole then he would not have hands free to be eating beans and gravy.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "A man hanging by one arm off of a pole from a building." that "The man is sitting on a couch."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
You cannot be hanging off a pole and sitting at a couch at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "The red-haired woman has her hand on the door post of the vehicle." is it true that "The red-haired woman is standing next to a car."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A car is a type of vehicle that the red-haired woman is standing by with her hand on the door post. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A boy in an orange shirt holds hands with an adult as he walks with a group of other children down a street." can we conclude that "A child holding hands with a grown-up walks with other kids."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A boy is a male child and an adult is the same as a grown up and children is another word for kids that are walking.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A group of young children in hats walking along a walkway accompanied by two adults."\nHypothesis: "A group of unaccompanied children run down a sidewalk."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] They would not be unaccompanied if they are accompanied by adults. The answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "Two adults are leading about a dozen children down a sidewalk."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Children are being led down a sidewalk during a field trip." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Children being led down a sidewalk does not imply it being during a field trip. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Several asian children walking with two teachers." can we conclude that "The children are walking alone."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] They would either be walking alone or with two teachers not both at the same time. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A street performer playing a drum set in front of a crowd of people." can we conclude that "The performer is sleeping."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A performer cannot be playing in front of people and sleeping at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User]
Premise: "A dog runs for a tennis ball in a backyard with a tile courtyard."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A dog on outdoor playing with a tile courtyard." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Runs (running) for a ball is often considered playing. Backyard is the outdoors in the rear of a residence. The answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man taking a picture of a brightly lit building."\nHypothesis: "The man walks by a brightly lit building on his way to work."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Taking a picture implies that someone paused or stood still not just a man who walks by. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "A man using a nice digital camera to snap a photo of a building lit up right before dusk." that "A man using a crappy disposable camera takes a photo right before dawn."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A camera is either nice and digital or crappy and disposable not both. So the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A large crowd of people are sitting outside of a store." is it true that "A store is about to open its doors to a crowd of eager customers."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] People sitting outside a store does not imply the store is about to open. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "African american woman bouncing black basketball."\nHypothesis: "Basketball player dribbles."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A woman bouncing a basketball does not imply being a basketball player or dribbling. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.