[User] Premise: "A man with a white mustache and an earpiece is smiling."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is twirling his mustache." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Just because a man has a mustache doesn't mean he is twirling it. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "The bald man with the white mustache is wearing a bluetooth earpiece."\nHypothesis: "A bald man is talking to someone via bluetooth."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A bluetooth earpiece that is worn does not a person is talking to anyone. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A father and son enjoy a ride in a motorized vehicle in the country." does that mean that "They are going on a camping trip."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A ride in the country does not indicate a camping trip. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man and child drive down the road in a forest in a blue tractor."\nHypothesis: "The man and woman drive down the road in a green tractor."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A blue tractor is not the same as a green tractor. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A bmx biker performing a trick high above the ground with trees covering the background."\nHypothesis: "The biker is performing in a bmx competition."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Just because a BMX biker is performing a trick doesn't mean it's in a BMX competition.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A little boys is enjoying a blue lollipop."\nHypothesis: "The boy is wearing a baseball cap."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
In no way is that he is wearing a baseball cap implied by the fact that he is little or enjoying a blue lollipop.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A girl in a yellow coat pretends to ride a stone lion."\nHypothesis: "A girl posing for a birthday photo."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] That she is posing for a birthday photo is not implied by the fact she us in a yellow coat or that she pretends to ride a stone lion. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A dog runs toward a tunnel." that "The dog is a lab."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] One can't infer that a dog that runs toward a tunnel is a lab. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A dog standing on his hind legs has his head and front paws on the kitchen counter."\nHypothesis: "A dog begs for food."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Because the dog stands on his hind legs and has his head and front paws on the kitchen counter does not necessarily mean that it begs for food. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A curious dog sniffs at grocery bags on a counter."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The dog is sleeping outside." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A curious dog who sniffs at things is awake and not sleeping. So the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Dog on two legs leaning against a counter with filled bags."\nHypothesis: "A dog is about to steal one of the bags."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Because the dog is leaning against a counter with bags does not mean it is about to steal.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "A brown dog is in an agility contest and running towards a blue tube." is it true that "A brown dog is winning a contest."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Because it is in agility contest does not imply it is winning. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "Dog climbs counter with red grocery bags." does that mean that "A dog climbs the counter for treats."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Because the dog climbs the counter and there are red grocery bags does not imply that it seeks treats.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A soccer player removes his shirt." can we conclude that "A soccer player takes his shirt off."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A soccer player who removes his shirt takes his shirt off.
The answer: yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two people stand and a third jumps in the air on a sunny day on an ocean beach."\nHypothesis: "Three people are enjoying the sun at the beach."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Beach implies there is a ocean. There has to be sun in order to have a sunny day.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A black and gray bucking bronco is attempting to buck off a cowboy at the rodeo."\nHypothesis: "A horse is attempting to throw off its rider."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A horse attempting to buck off a cowboy is attempting to throw off its rider.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man in a red plaid shirt holds on for dear life as the horse tries to throw him off."\nHypothesis: "A man on a bucking bronco."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A man on a horse who tries to throw him off is on a bucking bronco. The answer is yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "A man in a red plaid shirt is riding a horse in rodeo show." is it true that "The man is horse riding to win a prize."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The man in the red plaid shirt doesn't necessarily need to be riding for a prize just because he's on a horse in a rodeo show. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "A rodeo rider on a bucking horse with a clown in the background." does that mean that "The clown is at the circus."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Not because there is a clown in the background means people are in the circus. So the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "Two women are doing dishes in their kitchen." that "They throw the sun into the moon."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Women doing dishes can not throw the sun into the moon. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] If "A woman wearing orange is putting a bowl into a dishwasher next to another woman that is reaching for dish soap." does that mean that "A woman is helping her sister do the dishes."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Putting does not imply helping and not every woman is a sister. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two women are in a kitchen working together to load the dishwasher."\nHypothesis: "The women work at a restaurant."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Two women working together in a kitchen loading a dishwasher do not need to be working at a restaurant.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A woman writes a note for an older woman."\nHypothesis: "A man writes a letter to a younger man."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The writer can be either a woman or a man. While the receiver can either be an older man or a younger man. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "Two boys watch a third boy kicking some snow."\nHypothesis: "The third boy enjoyed kicking the snow."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
It's not known if the two boys could tell that the third boy enjoyed kicking the snow.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A boy in a green short is running in the sand."\nHypothesis: "A boy in a blue shirt is running in the sand about to step on a rattle snake."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The boy in the blue shirt apparently has nothing to do with the boy in the green shirt other than that they both are running in the sand. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A child wearing a green shirt is bungee climbing."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A child is rock climbing." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A child could be bungee climbing something other than a rock.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A boy in a green shirt running in the sand." can we conclude that "The boy is running on the beach to the ocean."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Running on the sand does not always mean on the beach.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two dogs run together through the leaves that have fallen."\nHypothesis: "There are two dogs eating dinner in the kitchen."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Dogs cannot run while eating and leaves that have fallen are seldom in the kitchen. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "A woman in a hospital gown sitting next to a woman who is writing on a pad."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A doctor is about to perform surgery on the patient." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The doctor wouldn't be wearing a hospital gown sitting while preparing to perform surgery. The answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "A man is serving drinks to people." that "A man is punching people in the face."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A man would have a hard time serving drinks to people if he is also punching them in the face.
The answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A couple is posing for a picture in the field."\nHypothesis: "The newlyweds are taking vacation photos."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Not all couples are newlyweds. Not all vacation photos are of pictures in a field. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A child climbs a rock wall."\nHypothesis: "A boy is having trouble with an exercise."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] He is climbing a rock wall and may not be having trouble with an exercise. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Three guys are on the beach and one is doing some kind of move where is body is off the ground." can we conclude that "The men are walking through the forest."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The men cannot simultaneously be in a forest and on a beach. They cannot all be walking and then one doing a move where they are in the air. Final answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Two men on opposite teams playing basketball."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A couple of guys on opposing sides playing basketball." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Two men and a couple of guys are the same thing.
The answer: yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "Two basketball players keep their eyes on the game."\nHypothesis: "The two basketball players were looking at the ground."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The two basketball players cannot be simultaneously looking at the ground while keeping eyes on the game.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "Two smiling children in a swimming pool." is it true that "The swimming pool is empty."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The pool cannot have two children in it and be empty at the same time.
The final answer: no.


[User] If "Two children relaxing by the pool." does that mean that "Two girls sitting by the pool."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] They children might not be girls and we don't know they are sitting. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A woman floats with her face out of water in a pool with another woman nearby posing for the camera."\nHypothesis: "She made record time on the hike up the mountain; primarily because of her swimming routines."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] One cannot float in a pool and hike up the mountain simultaneously. So, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "Two children are smiling for picture being taken of them in a swimming pool." is it true that "Two children are posing for a photo."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Children posing for a photo not necesarily mean they are smiling.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A shirtless young man punches snow as if he was selling perfume." that "A shirtless person is in the snow."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A man is a person; since he is punching snow he must be in it. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Two team are competing in a water-filled pit with a long pole."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A game is being played on a dry field." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The playing field can either be a dry field or water-filled pit. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Given the sentence "Two brown and white dogs fighting on a grassy area in front of a tree." can we conclude that "Two dogs are fighting over a toy."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Two dogs fighting over a toy not necessarily do it on a grassy area in front of a tree. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A group of teams competing in loggers sports in british columbia." can we conclude that "Individuals are competing."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
One cannot be an individuals competing and part of a teams simultaneously.
The answer: no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "The boxer kicked his opponent on the side of the face knocking his mouth guard out during the fight."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The boxer won the fight." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Kicked his opponent in the face does not imply that the boxer won the fight. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "One man round kicking another man in a ring."\nHypothesis: "The woman stood alone in the ring."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
One cannot be both a man and a woman. One cannot be alone and kicking another at the same time.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "One guy kicking another guy in the head."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two guys are in an altercation." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A guy kicking another in the head doesn't means the are in an altercation.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A group of people in blue shirts and black shorts are in the water."\nHypothesis: "The people are inside the dorm room."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The people are inside the dorm room while they are in the water.
The answer: no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A number of young people are having fun in a pool trying out their log-rolling skills." that "The people are sitting beside the pool."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A number of young people can not having fun in a pool and be sitting beside the pool simultaneously.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "Two elderly ladies are working at a table." that "Two older ladies are relaxing on the couch."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Two elderly ladies can not be working at a table and relaxing on the couch simultaneously.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "Two girls in a bathing suit hold up another girl in fun." that "People are wearing masks at a party."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Two girls in a bathing suit hold up another girl in fun while they are at a party.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "An old gentleman plays music on the street for money with a young boy by his side."\nHypothesis: "Two people play music on the street for money."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] An old man and a young boy play music on the street for money. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "There is a man in a striped shirt deep in concentration while in the background a woman is singing or talking into a microphone."\nHypothesis: "There is a man using his phone while a woman sings in the background."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Usually a man can not be deep in concentration and using phone at the same time.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "Two women looks over an item at a chinese convenience store."\nHypothesis: "Two women swimming in a lake."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Two women can not be at a Chinese convenience store and swimming in a lake at the same time.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two women shop at an asian convenience store."\nHypothesis: "The women buy asian vegetables to prepare an authentic meal."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The woman could have been buying items besides Asian vegetables and they could have been buying things besides groceries for an authentic meal.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Can we conclude from "Two chinese women at the cash and rap store third women counting her money for her purchase." that "The woman has a lot of money in dollars."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Counting her money does not imply that there was a lot of money in dollars. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A woman is sitting on a concrete bench in front of a loaded bicycle rack." can we conclude that "The woman forgot the code to her bike lock."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A woman sitting in front of a bicycle rack doesn't really imply that she forgot the code to her bike lock. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Two women are dancing while men play music behind them."\nHypothesis: "Two women dance."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Two women who are dancing equals two women who are in a dance. Final answer: yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Two women dancing on a walkway with band in the background and pedestrians walking by." is it true that "Two women sitting and listening to the band in the background."?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The women are either dancing or sitting. They cannot do both at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Texas a&m's ryan tannehill is nearly sacked by an iowa state player."\nHypothesis: "The rocks were hard."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Hard rocks have nothing to do with a football player getting sacked. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A poor black man holds a religious sign while standing outside of a food stand." can we conclude that "A homeless man stands near a food stand."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Just because you are poor does not mean you are homeless.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "A woman is walking and holding a plastic bag." that "A woman is carying bags full of groceries."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The woman can have anything in the bags it doesn't have to be groceries. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "Group of skiers talk on a hillside covered in snow." does that mean that "The skiers are covered in sand."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Skiers covered in snow would not also be covered in sand. Ski slopes have snow not sand. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Student: If "A girl and boy hugging in the cobblestone street." does that mean that "Two kids are at school."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The kids can't be hugging in the street and at school at the same time. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "A big black dog with fluffy fur runs in the surf of a rocky shore." that "Car in garage."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A dog is not a car. Inside a garage is not the same in the surf.
The answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "The black dog is in the water on the shore."\nHypothesis: "The black dog is training for water rescue."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The dog is in the water on the shore but it doesn't mean he is training for water rescue.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "The black dog is running through the water." does that mean that "Nothing is running."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The black dog can't be running if no one is running.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "An asian man is throwing a javelin in a yellow shirt." is it true that "A man is competing in a sports competition."?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A man can throw a javelin without necessarily being in a sports competition. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A lot of people are out on a beach." can we conclude that "A beach is completely empty."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] There can't be a lot of people on a beach if the beach is completely empty. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man in a yellow shirt and black shorts getting ready to throw a javelin."\nHypothesis: "A man dressed in yellow and black clothing prepares to hurl a javelin."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A man dressed in yellow and black clothing throws or hurls a javelin.
The answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A person standing behind two dogs interacting with one another."\nHypothesis: "A person standing behind some dogs."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A person standing behind two dogs means standing behind some dogs.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man in a maroon bathing suit swings on a rope on a lake." that "A man sits beside the sea."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A man can't be swinging and sits beside something at the same time. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A woman walking home from the market in a dirty neighborhood."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A woman is walking home in the dark." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Sentence 1: A woman walking home from the market in a dirty neighborhood. Sentence 2: A woman is walking home in the dark. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A woman in a sunhat is wearing sunglasses and laughing."\nHypothesis: "A woman is wearing a baseball cap and reading glasses."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
One can either be in a sunhat and sunglasses or a baseball cap and reading glasses.
The final answer: no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man sits on a pile of rugs by a building while three more men and a woman stand nearby." that "A man sits on rugs that he is selling."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Sentence 1: A man sits on a pile of rugs by a building while three more men and a woman stand nearby. Sentence 2: A man sits on rugs that he is selling. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Homely looking cheerleaders are performing."\nHypothesis: "Cheerleaders perform for a crowd."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Sentence 1: Homely looking cheerleaders are performing. Sentence 2: Cheerleaders perform for a crowd.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A man standing in the street enjoying the architecture of a building."\nHypothesis: "The man is watching a football game on television."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] One can not be enjoying architecture and watching a football game. The answer is no.


[User]
Premise: "Asian boy with his sleeves rolled up is standing in front of what appears to be a game board with circular pieces."\nHypothesis: "The boy is riding a bicycle."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The boy can't be standing and riding a bike at the same time. The answer is no.


[User] If "A young girl smiles as she walks in a parade boding orange and white." does that mean that "The girl is outside."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The girl walks in a parade so she is almost certainly outside.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Girls dressed in red and white outfits with feathers in their hair."\nHypothesis: "Two girls are wearing fancy clothes."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Two girls are plural and the red and white outfits are described further as fancy clothes.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Premise: "Women in hat and sunglasses smiles."\nHypothesis: "The woman is not wearing a hat."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The woman can't be in a hat and not wearing a hat at the same time. The answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Can we conclude from "Many of the dishes contain rice." that "Many of the dishes come with rice on the side."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Dishes containing rice does not infer that the rice is on the side.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A woman is handing out fruit." that "A fruit is handing out a woman."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The fruit can't hold our a woman if the woman is handing out a fruit.
The final answer: no.


[User] If "Two women out clothing shopping." does that mean that "The women are trying on clothes."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Just because out clothing shopping does not mean they are trying on clothes.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A fisherman is inside of a boat rowing while a bird is perched on the front of his boat."\nHypothesis: "The fisherman is rowing backwards while a bird is perched on the front of his boat."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
There is no way to know that he fisherman is rowing backwards.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: If "An elderly man kayaking in a body of water with a cute bird on the corner of his little boat." does that mean that "An elderly man is enjoying his day out on the rapids."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Just because he is kayaking does not necessarily mean he is enjoying his day and body of water is not necessarily rapids. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "The bird's feet are grasping the window tightly."\nHypothesis: "The bird is a family pet."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A bird can grasp a window and not be the family pet. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "The sign indicates a marker for the arlington line." that "This is a sign for the nearest mcdonald's."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The sign cannot indicate a marker for The Arlington Line and indicate the nearest McDonald's at the same time. So, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "The road is paved with grey bricks."\nHypothesis: "A road leading to suburb."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The road being paved with bricks does not mean it is leading to a suburb. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "The giraffe's mouth is closed." can we conclude that "The giraffe yells."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
You're mouth can't be closed and yells at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User] Premise: "The bat connects with the ball."\nHypothesis: "The bat is about to go flying miles away."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The bat would be flying miles away if it were to connects. Final answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A zebra is nibbling on some grass."\nHypothesis: "The zebra is hungry."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Hungry involves wanting to eat and nibbling describes the manner of eating. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "Little boy wearing a multicolored scarf and hat has a sad look on his face as he is looking down."\nHypothesis: "The little boy is wearing shoes."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Sentence 1: Little boy wearing a multicolored scarf and hat has a sad look on his face as he is looking down. Sentence 2: The little boy is wearing shoes. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Given the sentence "Young boy is dressed for cold weather." can we conclude that "A boy is building a lego set."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The boy is either dressed for cold weather or is building a lego set. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Student: If "A group of people are standing outside." does that mean that "Everyone is in a cinema."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A group of people cannot be standing outside if everyone is in a cinema. So the final answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "People eating or drinking in a kitchen." that "The family is having dinner."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The people eating in the kitchen are not necessarily family. The people are also not necessarily having dinner. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A group of soldiers in white hats." does that mean that "The soldiers are angry."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The soldiers wearing white hats do not necessarily have to be angry. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man and a woman are sorting through laundry with latex gloves on."\nHypothesis: "A man and a woman are having a romantic dinner."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The man and woman can't be sorting through laundry and having a romantic dinner at the same time.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "One man in a hooded sweatshirt picking up articles of clothing while a woman in a blue shirt looks on." is it true that "A man is picking up trash from the floor."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Picking up trash is not equivalent to picking up articles of clothing. So, the answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "Man and woman sort clothes together." that "Man having conversation with his wife while folding clothes."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The man and woman sorting clothes together do not necessarily have to be husband and wife. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two women exchange money for goods with a man at the market."\nHypothesis: "Women shopping for food."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The goods that the women exchange money for is not necessarily food. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A young boy next to apples at a medieval fair."\nHypothesis: "The boy cries as the other little boy steals his ice cream cone."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] There can't be another little boy of thete is only a young boy. So the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "A man is performing with fire sticks before a crowd outside." that "A man is performing outside."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A man is performing with fire sticks before a crowd outside implies A man is performing outside.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "Female fire dancer performing in the middle of a city street with a crowd watching." is it true that "A female is performing on a city street."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The fire dancer can be performing on a city street or the middle of a city street.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A street performer spinning fire." that "A former circus performer spins fire."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The street performer doesn't necessarily have to be a former circus performer.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A little girl is turned around in her seat at an event."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A little girl is turned around watching a mascot being silly in the stand behind her." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Just because the little girl is turned around in her seat doesn't mean that she is watching the mascot. The event that the girl is at does not necessarily imply that a mascot would be there. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "An elderly man and woman hold hands on the sidewalk."\nHypothesis: "Two children play on the sidewalk."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Children are not as old as an elderly man and woman. The answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A mountain climber stops for a drink."\nHypothesis: "A man climbing a mountain needs water."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] It is logical that the mountain climber would need water and stop for a drink. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A couple walking down the sidewalk holding hands. yo."\nHypothesis: "A couple is holding hands."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Walking down the sidewalk holding hands is a way of holding hands.
The answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "Two girlfriends smiling."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two girls are smiling." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Girlfriends can refer to two girls that are friends or two women in a same sex relationship.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A small cat laying with a large dog." can we conclude that "A little cat lays atop a dog."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A cat laying with a large dog does not necessarily mean the cat lays atop. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Two people sitting on a tree stump next to a stream."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two people are outside." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Two people would have to be outside to sit on a tree stump.
The answer: yes.


[User]
Premise: "Two people sitting on a tree stump in front of a pond."\nHypothesis: "People sitting outside by a pond."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Sitting in front of a pond is a way of sitting by a pond and a pond is outside so if people are sitting by a pond then they are sitting outside. The answer is yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "A man in a red shirt walking past wall art." can we conclude that "A man is walking past a wall."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Wall art is on a wall so if a man is walking past wall art then the man is walking past a wall. The answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A person holding a ""boombox"" on top of a bus."\nHypothesis: "Or boat."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A person is holding a boombox on top of a vehicle.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "Blond child with white long-sleeve shirt with static hair." is it true that "A kid is taking a bath."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A child with white long-sleeve shirt is definitely not taking a bath.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] If "A man on a bicycle is falling off of it and over a short ledge." does that mean that "A man wearing a helmet is on a bike."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Just because a man falls off his bicycle does not mean he wears a helmet. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A young boy in a swimsuit throws a rock into the water." is it true that "Someone is throwing something."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Someone refers to the young boy and the throwing of something refers to the rock.
Thus, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A woman in a red coat and brown hat and a man in a black leather coat walk by a street food vendor."\nHypothesis: "The woman has red hair."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A woman in a red coat does not necessarily have red hair. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A group of people standing by track 17 and waiting for a subway train." does that mean that "Some people are taking the train across town."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Using some can be the same as using group to describe the people. The train is a subway train.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "Boy throwing something into the ocean."\nHypothesis: "A boy next to the ocean."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The boy would be next to the ocean if he was capable of throwing something into it. So the answer is yes.


[User] Can we conclude from "A child with a sweater is holding a pen in his mouth." that "A kid thinks hard about the answers to the test."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Just because a kid holds a pen does not mean he thinks hard about answers or that he's taking a test. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A child in a blue sweater holds a pen in his mouth." is it true that "A man is holding a pencil."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A child is not a man and a pen is not a pencil.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A boy in a blue sweater holds a pen in his mouth."\nHypothesis: "A boy in a sweater with a pen."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The boy in the sweater is in possession of a pen. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A small boy is chewing on a pen."\nHypothesis: "A young child has a pen in his mouth."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Young is often used as a synonym for small. The boy has the pen in his mouth. You chew with your mouth. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Premise: "A mam and woman riding bicycles down a city street."\nHypothesis: "The man and woman are driving a car."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Either riding bicycles or driving a car is possible. Not together. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A cat sleeps nestled up to a dog."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two dogs are playing with each other." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Either one cat and a dog or two dogs. either sleeping or playing.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A young girl with her hair standing up." can we conclude that "A girl with her hair standing."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The girl is young. Hair stand and hair standing up have the same meanings. So the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A monster truck in the air above demolished cars." can we conclude that "A monster truck is demolishing cars in the world championship."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
It cannot be implied that the cars are in the World Championship.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man in a uniform saluting." that "A soldier saluting the president."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Not everyone in uniform is soldier and the salute receiving person the President.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "An older man wearing a military uniform saluting."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A veteran salutes at a funeral." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Not all older men in military uniforms are veterans. One can salute without being at a funeral. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A giant monster truck leaps over crushed cars and into the air inside the arena." that "Monster truck leaping over crushed cars."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The monster truck leaping over crushed cars is just a past tense action of how the truck leaps over crushed cars. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A child is having fun sledding with his mother."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "There are children sledding outdoors for fun." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] That one child is sledding does not necessarily mean there are other children doing the same thing. That the child is having fun does not necessarily mean the purpose of the sledding is fun. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A woman with dark hair working on some colorful fabric."\nHypothesis: "A sad woman with dark hair working on some colorful fabric."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Nothing about having dark hair in any way implies the woman is sad. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man lays down on a snowbank that has piled up high around the front door of his house."\nHypothesis: "The man a hair dryer trying to melt all the snow."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A man lays down cannot try to melt all the snow. Final answer: no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "Man with hard hat talking on phone."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Man smashes his phone on the concrete floor." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Talking on a phone is a different activity than smashing it. Yelling into a phone while it is being smashed is not really 'talking' on it. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A construction worker making a phone call."\nHypothesis: "The worker calls his boss."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
A construction worker making a phone call is not constrained to calling his boss.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A man wearing a hard hat is talking on a cellphone."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man on the phone was surfing on a tropical ocean." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A man surfing on a tropical ocean would not be wearing a hard hat. So the final answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A street vendor cooking food." that "A vendor is cooking popular food."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
That the vendor is cooking has no relationship to whether or not the vendor's food is popular.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "Young asian art students are focusing on their work in a very large class." is it true that "Students are learning to paint."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Learning to paint is not the only type of work art students might do. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Children at a table doing arts and crafts."\nHypothesis: "A school group makes paintings."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Paintings are not the only possible type of arts and crafts.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "Four hunks of meat spin on a spit while a man cuts food with a knife in the background." is it true that "Men picking up food from a truck."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A man cannot cuts food with a knife while picking up food from a truck. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A corgi jumps off a bale of hay."\nHypothesis: "M water and buildings behind it."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A corgi jumping into water next to a group of buildings outdoors. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A woman walking in front of a crowd on the sidewalk."\nHypothesis: "There is a woman walking to work."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Walking on a sidewalk does not mean one is necessarily walking to work.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A blond woman walks in a crowded city."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The woman is young." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Not all blond women who walk in crowded cities are young.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A waiting and growing crowd gathered on the far side walkway of an urban street."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The crowd is talking to each other." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] A crowd is not necessarily talking to each other if they are gathered. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A group of people crowded outside on a city street." that "Lots of people gather to watch a big parade."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A crowd of people gathered outside is not necessarily there to watch a big parade. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "A crowd forms in front of the theater." can we conclude that "Some people gather nearby a building."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A crowd in front of a theater doesn't imply they are nearby a building. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A little girl in a hello kitty shirt holding a bouquet of white roses." is it true that "A girl is holding flowers for her mom."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A little girl holding a bouquet of white roses doesn't imply she is holding the flowers for her mom.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "A woman buys food from a street vendor in a city while others continue on their way." is it true that "A woman on the street."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The woman that buys food from the street is definitely on the street. Final answer: yes.


[User] Given the sentence "Some people are standing outside at a sidewalk book sale." is it true that "A bookstore is selling remaindered books outside."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A store having a sidewalk book sale doesn't mean they are selling remaindered books. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "Two boys run after a soccer ball during a game." that "Two boys jump on a trampoline."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] One cannot run after a soccer ball and jump on a trampoline simultaneously. So the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Two boys go after a soccer ball during a game while a goalie waits."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The boys are playing frisbee." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
They either play with s soccer ball or with a frisbee.
The answer: no.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man is sitting behind a large collection of produce."\nHypothesis: "A man is sitting alone at home."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Sitting behind a large collection of produce suggests the man is in a market not at home. The answer is no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man in rodeo gear stands in the middle of an arena as several onlookers watch from behind the fence."\nHypothesis: "A cowboy is running away."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A man cannot be standing and running away at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "Woman is making a half smile at the camera." is it true that "Woman takes selfie."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Just because she smiles at the camera doesn't mean it's for a selfie.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A woman is waiting to cross the road."\nHypothesis: "The woman is waiting near the road."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Waiting near the road apparently indicates that the woman is waiting to cross the road. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "Dog running with a tennis ball in its mouth." that "The dog is running after a cat."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A dog running with a tennis ball is different from running after a cat. So the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "Two male individuals observing the contents of a table of books at a sidewalk sale." is it true that "The men are checking out cars at the dealership."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A table of books is different from cars at a dealership.
The final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "Two men race bicycles on the street." can we conclude that "Two bicyclists are stopped at a red light."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] The men cannot race bicycles while they are stopped at a red light. Final answer: no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A woman is vacuuming the floor in a kitchen." that "The vacuum is quiet."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The vacuum is not necessarily quiet if it is vacuuming the kitchen floor. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A young girl is preparing to blow on a dandelion in her hand."\nHypothesis: "The girl is making a model airplane."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Girl cannot be preparing to blow on a dandelion in her hand while making a model airplane. The answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A young girl is blowing on a dandelion."\nHypothesis: "The girl is making a wish."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Blowing on a dandelion does not imply she is making a wish. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A baby is crying while laying down on a changing table." that "The baby was happy and giggling."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The baby can't be crying and giggling at the same time. So the answer is no.


[User] Premise: "A black dog runs through the water with a ball in its mouth."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Dogs hate balls." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
The dog would not simultaneously hate balls and also run with a ball in its mouth.
The final answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "Teenage boys are playing hockey on a neighborhood field." can we conclude that "The boys watch a hockey game."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
If boys are playing hockey they cannot also be watching hockey.
The answer: no.


[User] Premise: "Three ice hockey players in black play outside."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A couple of basketball players eat at the cafeteria." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A couple of people cannot be three people. Ice hockey players are not basketball players. One does not eat while playing outside. A cafeteria is usually not outside. Final answer: no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A hockey goalie watches to players skate down ice." can we conclude that "The goalie is about to block the shot from the opposing player."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Just because a goalie watches players skate doesn't mean the goalie is about to block the shot from the opposing player. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Rays of sunlight poke through the slits of a house and illuminate a man and a woman as they chat."\nHypothesis: "There are openings in the walls."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
There are openings in the wall that allow rays of sunlight to poke through the slits of the house and illuminate a man and woman as they chat.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A boy in a blue outfit rowing a boat." that "A boy climbing a rope."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] If someone is rowing a boat they cannot be climbing a rope. So the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "An asian couple talking in the house." is it true that "Asian couple talking to each other."? Step by step answer:

[Assistant] There is an Asian couple talking to each other in the house. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: If "A woman in a green shirt is welding." does that mean that "A woman is cutting metal."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The woman can't be cutting metal and welding at the same time.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A man and woman sit down and talk." is it true that "A man and a woman are having a conversation."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A man and woman sit down at a restaurant together and start having a conversation.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A woman is soldering a piece of metal as a man watches." can we conclude that "One person observes another person working on making an ice cream cake."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Soldering a piece of metal and making an ice cream cake simultaneously is impossible. So the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "It appears as though an elderly man is sleeping or relaxing on some cool cement squares between two rows of pillars."\nHypothesis: "An elderly man is resting in his bed at the retirement home."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The man can't be relaxing on cool cement and resting in his bed at the same time.
The answer: no.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "A little girl in a yellow dress lays on a wooden floor surrounded by flowers."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A girl is watching tv while wearing nothing." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The girl is in a yellow dress so she cannot be wearing nothing.
The answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "A woman playing a saxophone." can we conclude that "The woman is playing saxophone for a jazz band."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A woman could be playing a saxophone for reasons other than a jazz band.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A young girl in a bright yellow dress surrounded by yellow flowers."\nHypothesis: "A child outside is surrounded by flowers that are the same color as her dress."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Just because the dress and flowers are yellow does not mean they are the same color of yellow. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
If "A boy wearing an orange doritos shirt looks like he's about to jump off of a piece of furniture." does that mean that "The boy is wearing an orange shirt."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Orange doritos is another way to describe the orange color of the shirt. The answer is yes.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A child wearing a yellow doritos shirt jumps up while another child is seen in the background."\nHypothesis: "A child jumps while another child is in the background."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Child wearing a yellow Doritos shirt is a type of child. The answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A boy wearing an orange shirt and brown shorts is jumping." is it true that "A boy is jumpin outside."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A boy who is jumping can be doing so inside or outside.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man in a teal outfit sitting on a rock with a half eaten apple overlooking a field."\nHypothesis: "All of the apples are rotten."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The man would have not have eaten half the apple if all apples were rotten. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: If "Silhouette of man in front of mountain landscape." does that mean that "A man poses for a photo after hiking to the top of a mountain."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A silhouette of a man in front of a mountain landscape does not imply it is after hiking to the top of a mountain.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A young boy in a black sweatshirt and red vest plays on a red jungle gym." that "A boy is playing with his friends on the jungle gym."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
To play on a jungle gym does not imply it is with friends.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A little boy in a red jacket plays on a jungle gym." is it true that "A boy is enjoy his recess from school."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Not all boys playing on a jungle gym are on recess from school. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A small black child plays on an outdoor jungle gym." does that mean that "A child is practicing for his gymnastics class later that day."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Not all children playing on a jungle gym are practicing for a gymnastics class. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Can we conclude from "A little boy playing on a playground." that "A boy runs around the playground."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Playing on a playground does not necessarily imply running around the playground.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A man and a woman dancing on a stage." that "Boy plays soccer alone."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A boy that is alone could not be a man with a woman. Dancing and playing soccer are two different actions.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "A little boy." is it true that "Playing t-ball on a sunny day with his dad watching from behind the fence."?
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A boy is playing tball while a guy is behind a fence.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Two children in orange sunglasses."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two children wear sunglasses." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] To be in sunglasses is to wear sunglasses. In this case the sunglasses are orange. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "Young boy playing tee ball." can we conclude that "Young boy plays with a toy."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Sentence 1: Young boy playing tee ball. Sentence 2: Young boy plays with a toy. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A young girl with a big smile."\nHypothesis: "Wearing brightly colored clothing helps prepare food in a narrow alley."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] There is a little girl helping her family prepare dinner outside their house. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A girl wearing a blue floral patterned dress is sitting on the cement and sorting leaves."\nHypothesis: "The girl in a dress is sitting on the ground."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The girl is sitting on the ground which is cemented and sorting leaves.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "This is a street in a poor area where two people are sorting through tobacco."\nHypothesis: "Poor people sort tobacco."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Sentence 1: This is a street in a poor area where two people are sorting through tobacco. Sentence 2: Poor people sort tobacco. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "This lady in the print dress is stripping food for dinner." can we conclude that "The lady is stripping for food."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] One can be either stripping for food or stripping food for dinner. So, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: Given the sentence "A woman puts the firewood in order." can we conclude that "A woman is building a metal boat using bricks."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
One cannot be putting the firewood in order and building a metal boat simultaneously.
The answer: no.


[User]
Given the sentence "Girl in pink shirt and blue flowered shorts swinging a pillow." can we conclude that "A girl in a shirt and shorts is swinging a pillow."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Girl in pink shirt and blue flowered shorts implies that she is wearing shirt and shorts. The answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A girl smiling and raising her left arm."\nHypothesis: "A girl is crying."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
A girl cannot be smiling and crying at the same time.
Thus, the answer is no.


[User]
Given the sentence "A young adult reads a book at the laundromat as he waits for his laundry to be done." is it true that "A young girl reads a book while waiting on her laundry at the laundromat."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Just because at laundromat does not mean waiting on her laundry. The answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A guy with a blue jean jacket is reading a book in a black and white checkered floored laundry mat." that "A man in a jean jacket reads a book."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] A guy is a equivalent of man. Blue jean jacket is the color of jean jacket. Final answer: yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "Man in a laundromat reading a book." is it true that "A person waiting for their laundry."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Man is a person. A laundromat is where people do their laundry. The answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: If "Two old people walk down a set of stairs." does that mean that "Holding hands."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The two old people have been together for a very long time.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Two football players fight to gain possession of the ball."\nHypothesis: "The game is very close."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Just because fight to gain possession does not mean game is very close. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A couple shares a kiss holding a bouquet."\nHypothesis: "A couple kissing one another as the girl holds onto a bouquet."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A couple shares a kiss implies they are kissing one another. So the final answer is yes.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A man is wearing a hat and a white shirt."\nHypothesis: "The man is wearing a hat."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] You cannot be wearing a shirt and a hat at the same time. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "An artist at work with all his supplies around him."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The artist has supplies." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
An artist with all his supplies around him shows the artist has supplies.
The answer: yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "A man dressed in white sitting on a bench." is it true that "A man is on a bench."?
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] One is sitting on a bench implies that one is on a bench. The answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A singing group performs a song at a upscale event." can we conclude that "Singers lost their voices and mime."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] Singers that lost their voices and mime cannot perform a song. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Nine men wearing tuxedos sing." is it true that "Men wearing tuxedos sing."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Men wearing tuxedos sing is less descriptive way of saying that nine men wearing tuxedos sing. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Can we conclude from "A lone firefighter helps tame a large fire." that "One man figts a fire."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] One means lone and a firefighter is a man who fights a fire. The answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "There is a man looking a girls necklace."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The skateboard was black." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] There is no mention of a skateboard in the first sentence. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "A firefighter sprays water onto a gigantic pile or burning ash that includes flames and dark smoke." that "A firefighter puts out a fire."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
To spray water onto flames means to put out a fire.
The final answer: yes.


[User] If "The man in the black hat holds the brown hair woman's necklace." does that mean that "The man has no clothing of any kind."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
The man is either wearing a black hat or is wearing nothing at all. He cannot wear both simultaneously.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A man checks out the beautiful necklace a woman is wearing."\nHypothesis: "The man is looking at the lady."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Checks out woman is being rephrased as looking at the lady. So the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: If "A man with a shocked expression on his face is holding a beaded necklace that is around a woman's neck." does that mean that "A man was given a necklace and he was taken aback."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Men can be given or give a necklace to a person. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Someone in a black sweatshirt and jeans leaps into the air on a beach while a kneeling person in jeans and a black jacket takes a photograph."\nHypothesis: "One human takes a picture of another."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Someone leaps while a person takes a photograph is simplified into one takes picture of another. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
If "Two people dressed in black sweatshirts are enjoying athletic activities on a deserted beach." does that mean that "Man in his living room."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] One man cannot be two people. The person or people cannot be both in a living room and on a deserted beach simultaneously. The answer is no.


[User] Can we conclude from "A person dressed in black clothing is jumping on a beach." that "A person at the beach running from a dog."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The person is either jumping or running. They cannot do both simultaneously. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A man in a black hoodie is jumping over a log."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man in a white hoodie is taking a walk." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The man's hoodie is either black or white. The man himself is either jumping over a log or taking a walk. He cannot do both simultaneously. So the final answer is no.


[User]
Leo: Given the sentence "Two friends having a great day on a beach." can we conclude that "There are dogs on the beach."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
Nothing about friendship or having a great day imply the presence of dogs.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A group of people surround a tree as someone places dirt to bury the roots."\nHypothesis: "People chopping down a tree."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
One can not bury the roots of a tree (planting) and be chopping it down simultaneously.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User]
Denny asked: If "Two men move dirt around a young tree." does that mean that "They are physical laborers."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Because men move dirt around a tree does not necessarily imply that they are physical laborers.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from "A running back maneuvers himself into an opening between two lineman as he attempts to run the ball down the football field." that "A footballer finds the gap between opponent to take the ball."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] The specific action of a back that maneuvers into an opening to run the ball is more generally described by a footballer that finds a gap and takes the ball through it. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A girl is sliding into a small pool of water."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A girl is near some water." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
If a girl is going into some sort of body of water then she is certainly near that water as well.
Therefore, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A small dog plays with a very big limb." is it true that "A dog plays with his owner."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Sentence 1: A small dog plays with a very big limb. Sentence 2: A dog plays with his owner. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A monk walks down a city street."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A person striding next to a road." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A monk that walks down a street is described more generally as a person striding by a road. So the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A young man jumps hurdles in a race on a track." can we conclude that "A young man is racing."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Racing does not have to occur because a man jumps hurdles in a race on a track.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A monk in a red shawl looks at the camera."\nHypothesis: "A monk looking at the camera."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] The monk looks at the camera is carrying out the action of looking regardless of what he is wearing. The answer is yes.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "A older man in a orange wrap looks into the camera on the sidewalk of a city."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "An older man looking into a camera to photograph a building." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The man may not be about to use his camera to photgraph a building specifically.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Can we conclude from "An older blond lady in a white shirt crosses the street." that "The older blond woman is crossing the street."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A woman crossing the street is a restatement of lady wearing some specific clothes that also crosses the street. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A man in a white outfit is playing an electric keyboard." is it true that "A man is teaching a cat how to gargle salt water."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] One cannot be teaching someone how to gargle and playing a guitar at the same time. Final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A man in a snazzy silver suit is playing the keyboard and singing."\nHypothesis: "The man is wearing a silver outfit."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man cannot be playing and wearing at the same time.
The final answer: yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Premise: "Musician is dressed in white and playing keyboard with band."\nHypothesis: "The musician started the band."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
Nothing about being dressed in white and playing keyboard with band implies that a musician started the band.
The answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "A lady seated with a child wearing balloons and looking at cellphone."\nHypothesis: "A woman is at the fair with her child."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] That she is at the fair with her child is not implied by a woman sitting with a child wearing balloons. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "A smiling boy in winter clothes waves his mittened hands outside a building in the snow." does that mean that "It is cold outside."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Winter clothes and mittens are things you wear outside when it's cold. So, the answer is yes.


[User] Given the sentence "A woman holding a young child giving a thumbs up." can we conclude that "The woman holding the child made a gesture."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The gesture must be a thumbs up as the same woman is holding a child. Therefore, the final answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A man wearing white sits on a wooden bench against a white wall."\nHypothesis: "The man is standing."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
One cannot be standing while he sits at the same time.
The final answer: no.


[User] Premise: "A little boy spays a hose at his brother who is on the other side of a window."\nHypothesis: "A boy spays his brother with a hose."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Spraying his brother on the other side of a window does not that he spays his brother directly with a hose.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A child is looking through the glass at the child squirting a water hose onto the glass."\nHypothesis: "A child makes fun of the other."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A child looking at someone else through a glass does not mean that child makes fun of that person.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "One little boy is standing inside a house on one side of a window while another boy is outside squirting the window with a hose."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two children play firefighter with each other." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Just because one child is outside squirting a hose at another child inside the house does not mean they play firefighter. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] If "One child sprays a water hose at another who is inside behind a glass window." does that mean that "One child soaks another with a hose."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
One child is being sprayed with a hose so therefore he must be soaked.
The final answer: yes.


[User] Premise: "A man waits at a crosswalk holding a motorbike helmet."\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man is on his way to work." is true?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man with a motorbike helmet does not mean he is on his way to work.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man holding his motorcycle helmet at a crosswalk."\nHypothesis: "Someone is crossing a crosswalk."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A man cannot be holding his motorcycle and crossing a crosswalk at the same time. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Given the sentence "A man in a leather jacket holding a helmet at a crosswalk." can we conclude that "A man holds his helmet near the street."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] A crosswalk is near the street so if a man is at a crosswalk he is near the street. The answer is yes.


[User]
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "People are standing in front of an empanada store."\nHypothesis: "People are standing outside."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?

[Assistant]
The front of a store is outside so if people are standing in front of a store then people are outside.
The answer: yes.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "A flock of pigeons parades across an empty square." that "Pigeons settle on a statue in a city."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Pigeons can be either parading across a square or settling on a statue. So the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A group of pigeons walk on a sidewalk." is it true that "The pigeons are looking for food."? A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
Just because pigeons walk on a sidewalk does not mean they are looking for food.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A woman holding a child giving a thumbs up sign."\nHypothesis: "A woman is taking care of a child."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] A woamn cannot be holding a child at the same time be giving a thumbs. So the answer is yes.


[User] Premise: "A busy supermarket filled with people."\nHypothesis: "People are getting ready for a blizzard by stocking up on essentials."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Just because a supermarket is busy does not mean people are stocking up and getting ready for a blizzard. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Leo: Premise: "People sit on a bench in a city square with random objects including a lamp and a dressmakers form standing nearby."\nHypothesis: "People are sitting at an outdoor flea market."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me:

[Assistant]
The objects the people are sitting by may not be part of an outdoor flea market.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Two men are cleaning up dried leaves using leaf-blowers."\nHypothesis: "The two men are brothers."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
Men can clean up dried leaves using leaf-blowers and not be brothers.
Therefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "Young boys in a martial arts studio practicing punches." is it true that "Young boys are becoming master of martial arts."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Not all boys practicing punches are becoming master of martial arts. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Can we conclude from "Two females dressed in pink are sitting on swings that are part of a suspended wooden square contraption." that "The two females on swings are related to each other."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] Two women sitting on swings are not necessarily related to each other. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A man in a red hat is holding a bag that has a can in it."\nHypothesis: "A man is holding books."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] The objects being held are different- books are not a bag. So the final answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence "A man with a beard and red hat sits down with a drink in a paper bag." is it true that "A homeless santa look-alike drinks beer."?. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Not all man with a beard is homeless. Not all man with a red hat is a santa look-alike. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "A man wearing sunglasses is sitting in a small vehicle."\nHypothesis: "Man at work."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no A step-by-step solution is:

[Assistant]
A man sitting isn't the same as a man at work.
The final answer: no.


[User] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: "Race car driver sitting in his race car."\nHypothesis: "A driver sits in his race car."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] A driver who sits in his race car is sitting in it. So, the answer is yes.


[User]
Student: Premise: "A man sitting in a racing car with black sunglasses and a look that reads ""i'm ready to win."\nHypothesis: "A man sits in a racing car at the starting line."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.
Teacher: Let's think:

[Assistant] A man at the starting line isn't always 'ready to win'. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Premise: "A man in sunglasses sits in a race car with an exposed engine."\nHypothesis: "A man in sunglasses waits in his race car with the hood up."\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] Someone who sits in a race car waits. An exposed engine has the hood up. The answer is yes.


[User] If "Children are climbing and digging in the sand at a makeshift playground." does that mean that "Which features a structure made from tires."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] Children have dug deep into the sand in a makeshift playground. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Premise: "Kids playing at a playground on a stack of tires."\nHypothesis: "Playgrounds never have accidents."\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

[Assistant] Playing on a stack of tires will almost certainly cause an accident at the playground. Final answer: no.


[User] Given the sentence "A little boy climbs a tire structure on a playground." is it true that "A person playing in a ground."? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

[Assistant] The person playing in a ground may not be a little boy. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User] Given the sentence "Two girls at a part pouring drinks." can we conclude that "Two girls at a party enjoy a sandwich."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no Step by step answer:

[Assistant] The two girls are either pouring drinks or enjoying a sandwich. Therefore, the final answer is no.


[User] Given the sentence "A man and woman walking past a record shop." is it true that "The man and woman are underwater."? Stream of thoughts:

[Assistant]
A man and a man cannot be walking past a record shop if they are underwater.
Therefore, the answer is no.


[User] Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If "Two dogs run through mud." does that mean that "Two dogs run through mud while chasing a car."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:

[Assistant] Two dogs running through mud does not imply chasing a car. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.


[User]
Given the sentence "A crowd of people gathered in front of a building at night." can we conclude that "There are people are outside the building."?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no
Let's solve step-by-step:

[Assistant] In front of a building is same as outside the building. The answer is yes.