Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Industrial Designer: M about fifty Euros . User Interface: yeah . Industrial Designer: That's quite ex User Interface: That's price , but w w Industrial Designer: well , it's not it's not very expensive for a remote control that that has this functionality . User Interface: No . An original remote control of any TV kind , uh a Phillips remote control , y you pay uh Industrial Designer: Yes , it's more than fifty Euros . It's quite expensive , yes . User Interface: Yeah , I kn I know uh from a few years ago , it it it costed hundred Gilders . Project Manager: NAME_1 but well yeah , I know , but you're paying for th for the brand , because there are uh remote controls which control your stereo , television , D_V_D_ , C_D_ player , for under twenty five Euros . Industrial Designer: Yes . Yes , but you can you c Yes , but you can learn this thing , all these functions . Project Manager: Yeah . Industrial Designer: And it's

Summary:
1. The Industrial Designer noted that the price of fifty-five Euros was reasonable for a remote control with the functionality it had compared to an original remote control of any TV kind.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.