HI, could you rewrite the following mail in a more polite way. Thanks:
Dear all,

Let me introduce myself, I am <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_PERSON> working in Esteyco as a structural engineer for the DemoWheel project. From now on I will be the contact point from Esteyco’s side on the suspension tendons for the DemoWHEEL project. 

Sorry for the late reply, we have been working internally on the certification process definition, which includes the testing program for the suspension tendons. After the meetings with B&B and DSM we have a first proposal for the testing program of the suspension tendons, based on the proposal presented by B&B in our last meeting. Attached is an Excel file, where the possible tests to be carried out are defined. Additionally, we have introduced a new column to include any relevant previous test that B&B or DSM have that could be handled to the Certification Body to strengthen our proposal.

This is a first version of the table, and the goal is to fill it between B&B and Esteyco as soon as possible with the aim to finally present it to the Certification Body. Please, feel free to introduce your comments or modifications on it, or if you prefer, just answer to this mail with your comments and I’ll keep it updated. 

We must keep in mind that we are pursuing a prototype certification which is indeed a considerably lower certification level that the one applicable to commercial projects. In coherence, the extent of the supporting experimental testing should not be the same as in commercial projects. In our opinion, the elongation and stiffness test and the HMPE creep test may not be needed for a prototype certification if the numerical tools developed by DSM(Avient) are employed and previous data of the same tests carried out on similar ropes or yarns are provided. But, please, let us know your opinion on this. 

We must keep in mind that we currently have no budget allocated for tendon testing other than what could be fit into B&B’s budget (some savings in the mooring part are currently expected that could be redirected to testing; absolutely no problem in that regard for the EU Commission). We might jointly pursue the obtention of some additional R&D funding for the Termination wear&tear testing, being a test that is not standard and could be linked to an innovative solution or application. However, to pursue such potential additional R&D funding we must have first a general idea of their definition and an estimate of their expected cost, envisioned dates and potential locations. 

Please @<PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS> find attached the LDD of two different tendons obtained from our preliminary analyses, the data has been obtained considering a linear elastic stiffness of 84MBL and has not been multiplied by any partial security factor. We are looking forward on working with the developed tools by DSM(Avient), please tell us the next steps to follow in this matter. I don’t forget about the introduction presentation we used in our last meeting, I’ll send it to you as soon as possible. 
Do not hesitate to contact me for any further information needed.