Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
FIRST ON FOX: Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee NAME_1 traveled to Kyiv Tuesday with a congressional delegation to see "first-hand" what is happening on the ground in Ukraine and conduct oversight to gain better insight on the Russia-Ukraine war. NAME_2, R-Texas, was joined on the trip by Reps. NAME_3, R-Calif., NAME_4, R-Texas, NAME_5, R-Ohio, and NAME_6, R-Texas, Fox News Digital has learned. Earlier Tuesday, the lawmakers were in NAME_7 meeting with Ukrainian Prosecutor General NAME_8. They also met with Ukrainian President NAME_9 before conducting a press conference in Kyiv. BIDEN 'PHOTO OP' IN KYIV NOT ENOUGH, US MUST SEND MORE LETHAL AID: TOP FOREIGN AFFAIRS REPUBLICANS A Foreign Affairs Committee aide told Fox News Digital that the delegation traveled to Ukraine to see "first-hand" what is occurring on the ground in the war zone. The trip was designed to prioritize oversight and the lawmakers plan to be transparent about their findings and meetings. The lawmakers also held a meeting focused on Russian war crimes and plan to hold a hearing in

Summary:
1. The House Foreign Affairs lawmakers met with Ukrainian President NAME_10 during a trip aimed at conducting oversight as Ukraine defends itself from Russia.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Y