Title: Performance and comparison of artificial intelligence and human experts in the detection
and classification of colonic polyps
Version: 5 Date: 04 Sep 2022
Reviewer's report:
1. The author refined the Figures I commented. However, I found miss plotting with incorrect
colour. For example, in Figs.3A, 3B, and 4A, [41] is plotted with red colour, but this work tackles
polyp classification. Please carefully recheck the references and modify the plotting colours.
2. I think the revised conclusions is still out of focus. The authors wrote “Further external
validation of AI and new reporting standards for deep learning is needed.” However, in the field
of Engineering such that Pattern Recognition, Machine Learning, Medical Imaging and Medical
Image Analysis, the external evaluation and reporting style for machine-learning methods
including deep learning have already existed as I commented in the previous round. In other
words, ‘reporting standards for deep learning’ have already exist. I think it means ‘reporting
standards for deep-learning application to the colonoscopy’. Furthermore,  what should be
reported in a new reporting style? Please make this point clear.
Title: Performance and comparison of artificial intelligence and human experts in the detection
and classification of colonic polyps
Version: 5 Date: 04 Sep 2022
Reviewer's report:
1. The author refined the Figures I commented. However, I found miss plotting with incorrect
colour. For example, in Figs.3A, 3B, and 4A, [41] is plotted with red colour, but this work tackles
polyp classification. Please carefully recheck the references and modify the plotting colours.
2. I think the revised conclusions is still out of focus. The authors wrote “Further external
validation of AI and new reporting standards for deep learning is needed.” However, in the field
of Engineering such that Pattern Recognition, Machine Learning, Medical Imaging and Medical
Image Analysis, the external evaluation and reporting style for machine-learning methods
including deep learning have already existed as I commented in the previous round. In other
words, ‘reporting standards for deep learning’ have already exist. I think it means ‘reporting
standards for deep-learning application to the colonoscopy’. Furthermore,  what should be
reported in a new reporting style? Please make this point clear.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Performance and comparison of artificial intelligence and human experts in the detection
and classification of colonic polyps
Version: 5 Date: 04 Sep 2022
Reviewer's report:
1. The author refined the Figures I commented. However, I found miss plotting with incorrect
colour. For example, in Figs.3A, 3B, and 4A, [41] is plotted with red colour, but this work tackles
polyp classification. Please carefully recheck the references and modify the plotting colours.
2. I think the revised conclusions is still out of focus. The authors wrote “Further external
validation of AI and new reporting standards for deep learning is needed.” However, in the field
of Engineering such that Pattern Recognition, Machine Learning, Medical Imaging and Medical
Image Analysis, the external evaluation and reporting style for machine-learning methods
including deep learning have already existed as I commented in the previous round. In other
words, ‘reporting standards for deep learning’ have already exist. I think it means ‘reporting
standards for deep-learning application to the colonoscopy’. Furthermore,  what should be
reported in a new reporting style? Please make this point clear.
assistant