Title: Predictive factors of portal hypertensive enteropathy exacerbations based on long-term
outcomes
Version: 0 Date: 06 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
The study offers valuable insights into the clinical significance and predictive factors of Portal
hypertensive enteropathy (PHE) exacerbation, which could contribute to better management of
PHE. However, several issues need further clarification:
With the exacerbated group consisting of only 19 patients, including more than two predictors
in the model could lead to overfitting and inflation of the results.
Potential information bias in the study could compromise the reliability of the findings.
The study might not fully account for confounding variables such as differences in
comorbidities, varying degrees of adherence to treatment, or differences in treatment regimens.
Title: Predictive factors of portal hypertensive enteropathy exacerbations based on long-term
outcomes
Version: 0 Date: 06 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
The study offers valuable insights into the clinical significance and predictive factors of Portal
hypertensive enteropathy (PHE) exacerbation, which could contribute to better management of
PHE. However, several issues need further clarification:
With the exacerbated group consisting of only 19 patients, including more than two predictors
in the model could lead to overfitting and inflation of the results.
Potential information bias in the study could compromise the reliability of the findings.
The study might not fully account for confounding variables such as differences in
comorbidities, varying degrees of adherence to treatment, or differences in treatment regimens.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Predictive factors of portal hypertensive enteropathy exacerbations based on long-term
outcomes
Version: 0 Date: 06 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
The study offers valuable insights into the clinical significance and predictive factors of Portal
hypertensive enteropathy (PHE) exacerbation, which could contribute to better management of
PHE. However, several issues need further clarification:
With the exacerbated group consisting of only 19 patients, including more than two predictors
in the model could lead to overfitting and inflation of the results.
Potential information bias in the study could compromise the reliability of the findings.
The study might not fully account for confounding variables such as differences in
comorbidities, varying degrees of adherence to treatment, or differences in treatment regimens.
assistant