Reviewer's report
Title:Detection and treatment of an aneurysma spurium of the arteria hepatica
dextra after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Version: 1Date:5 April 2013
Reviewer: Michael R&uuml;nzi
Reviewer's report:
Major compulsory Revisions:
Interesting case ! However, please explain why patient was not sent to
gastroscopy 2nd time he was admitted to the hospital. This would have probably
shown signs of blood in the duodenal or jejunal lumina. Further, why didn't
capsule endoscopy reveal the source of bleeding ?
In the case presentation section of the ms. the communication of the aneurysm
with the small bowel is not stated, please explain and correct. There is only a hint
later in the conclusion section.
Minor essential revisions
In the Conclusion section is stated that lap liver resection is a treatment option,
the wording should be "partial liver resection"
Disctretionary revisions
Obviously the interventional radiologist sealed the case and stopped the
bleeding. One should give him credit in an aknowledgement or as co-author.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:Detection and treatment of an aneurysma spurium of the arteria hepatica
dextra after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Version: 1Date:5 April 2013
Reviewer: Michael R&uuml;nzi
Reviewer's report:
Major compulsory Revisions:
Interesting case ! However, please explain why patient was not sent to
gastroscopy 2nd time he was admitted to the hospital. This would have probably
shown signs of blood in the duodenal or jejunal lumina. Further, why didn't
capsule endoscopy reveal the source of bleeding ?
In the case presentation section of the ms. the communication of the aneurysm
with the small bowel is not stated, please explain and correct. There is only a hint
later in the conclusion section.
Minor essential revisions
In the Conclusion section is stated that lap liver resection is a treatment option,
the wording should be "partial liver resection"
Disctretionary revisions
Obviously the interventional radiologist sealed the case and stopped the
bleeding. One should give him credit in an aknowledgement or as co-author.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Detection and treatment of an aneurysma spurium of the arteria hepatica
dextra after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Version: 1Date:5 April 2013
Reviewer: Michael R&uuml;nzi
Reviewer's report:
Major compulsory Revisions:
Interesting case ! However, please explain why patient was not sent to
gastroscopy 2nd time he was admitted to the hospital. This would have probably
shown signs of blood in the duodenal or jejunal lumina. Further, why didn't
capsule endoscopy reveal the source of bleeding ?
In the case presentation section of the ms. the communication of the aneurysm
with the small bowel is not stated, please explain and correct. There is only a hint
later in the conclusion section.
Minor essential revisions
In the Conclusion section is stated that lap liver resection is a treatment option,
the wording should be "partial liver resection"
Disctretionary revisions
Obviously the interventional radiologist sealed the case and stopped the
bleeding. One should give him credit in an aknowledgement or as co-author.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
assistant