Title: PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE AMONG DYSPEPTIC PATIENTS AT ENDOSCOPY
UNIT, UNIVERSITY OF GONDAR HOSPITAL, NORTH WEST ETHIOPIA
Version: 4 Date: 10 Mar 2022
Reviewer's report:
First of I would like to thanks the authors for effort to revised the manuscript. Having saying
this I do to have  two major concern.
1) First concern regarding your sampling method. you used non-probability sampling method
which don't allow a conclusion to your general population. if so you have justify it clearly or
mention it as you limitation your study.
2) Second regarding your finding. You reported two associated factors PUD. but this factors are
well known. So what did you add to scientific community from your study .
Title: PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE AMONG DYSPEPTIC PATIENTS AT ENDOSCOPY
UNIT, UNIVERSITY OF GONDAR HOSPITAL, NORTH WEST ETHIOPIA
Version: 4 Date: 10 Mar 2022
Reviewer's report:
First of I would like to thanks the authors for effort to revised the manuscript. Having saying
this I do to have  two major concern.
1) First concern regarding your sampling method. you used non-probability sampling method
which don't allow a conclusion to your general population. if so you have justify it clearly or
mention it as you limitation your study.
2) Second regarding your finding. You reported two associated factors PUD. but this factors are
well known. So what did you add to scientific community from your study .
Please review this paper.
user
Title: PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE AMONG DYSPEPTIC PATIENTS AT ENDOSCOPY
UNIT, UNIVERSITY OF GONDAR HOSPITAL, NORTH WEST ETHIOPIA
Version: 4 Date: 10 Mar 2022
Reviewer's report:
First of I would like to thanks the authors for effort to revised the manuscript. Having saying
this I do to have  two major concern.
1) First concern regarding your sampling method. you used non-probability sampling method
which don't allow a conclusion to your general population. if so you have justify it clearly or
mention it as you limitation your study.
2) Second regarding your finding. You reported two associated factors PUD. but this factors are
well known. So what did you add to scientific community from your study .
assistant