Reviewer's report
Title:Ischemic acute pancreatitis with pancreatic pseudocyst in a patient with
abdominal aortic aneurysm and generalized atheromatosis - case report
Version:2Date:5 March 2014
Reviewer: Rakesh Kochhar
Reviewer's report:
1 The case report needs to be made concise; currently it reads like a case-file.
2 Its an interesting case but the authors should define the pancreatic collection
as per revised Atlanta classification
3 The authors should give a pathogenetic mechanism of pancreatitis in their
patient with reference to available literature which they have quoted.rightly.
4 The authors should specify in which category the association of acute
pancreatitis and aortic aneurysm falls possible/probable/conjectural.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Reviewer's report
Title:Ischemic acute pancreatitis with pancreatic pseudocyst in a patient with
abdominal aortic aneurysm and generalized atheromatosis - case report
Version:2Date:5 March 2014
Reviewer: Rakesh Kochhar
Reviewer's report:
1 The case report needs to be made concise; currently it reads like a case-file.
2 Its an interesting case but the authors should define the pancreatic collection
as per revised Atlanta classification
3 The authors should give a pathogenetic mechanism of pancreatitis in their
patient with reference to available literature which they have quoted.rightly.
4 The authors should specify in which category the association of acute
pancreatitis and aortic aneurysm falls possible/probable/conjectural.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Ischemic acute pancreatitis with pancreatic pseudocyst in a patient with
abdominal aortic aneurysm and generalized atheromatosis - case report
Version:2Date:5 March 2014
Reviewer: Rakesh Kochhar
Reviewer's report:
1 The case report needs to be made concise; currently it reads like a case-file.
2 Its an interesting case but the authors should define the pancreatic collection
as per revised Atlanta classification
3 The authors should give a pathogenetic mechanism of pancreatitis in their
patient with reference to available literature which they have quoted.rightly.
4 The authors should specify in which category the association of acute
pancreatitis and aortic aneurysm falls possible/probable/conjectural.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
assistant