Title: Status of Short Videos as Health Information Sources for Chronic Pancreatitis in China:
A Cross-sectional Study
Version: 1 Date: 09 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript, which provides a valuable contribution to the field of
health information dissemination. To further strengthen the manuscript, I recommend addressing
the following points: clarifying the video selection criteria, providing detailed scoring criteria
for the evaluation tools, expanding the discussion on platform differences, and strengthening the
statistical analysis. These revisions will enhance the methodological transparency and depth of
your study. Overall, this is a well-conducted piece of research with significant potential impact,
and I look forward to seeing the revised version.
Title: Status of Short Videos as Health Information Sources for Chronic Pancreatitis in China:
A Cross-sectional Study
Version: 1 Date: 09 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript, which provides a valuable contribution to the field of
health information dissemination. To further strengthen the manuscript, I recommend addressing
the following points: clarifying the video selection criteria, providing detailed scoring criteria
for the evaluation tools, expanding the discussion on platform differences, and strengthening the
statistical analysis. These revisions will enhance the methodological transparency and depth of
your study. Overall, this is a well-conducted piece of research with significant potential impact,
and I look forward to seeing the revised version.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Status of Short Videos as Health Information Sources for Chronic Pancreatitis in China:
A Cross-sectional Study
Version: 1 Date: 09 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript, which provides a valuable contribution to the field of
health information dissemination. To further strengthen the manuscript, I recommend addressing
the following points: clarifying the video selection criteria, providing detailed scoring criteria
for the evaluation tools, expanding the discussion on platform differences, and strengthening the
statistical analysis. These revisions will enhance the methodological transparency and depth of
your study. Overall, this is a well-conducted piece of research with significant potential impact,
and I look forward to seeing the revised version.
assistant