Title: Effect of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Sulfonylurea on Colorectal Cancer Development:
A Case-Control Study
Version: 3 Date: 20 Aug 2024
Reviewer:  Patroklos Katafygiotis
Reviewer's report:
#The paper presents a very interesting topic that has not been studied enough and the conclusions
to date are chaotic.
#I think there are still issues with the style of writing.
#The phrase "chance of contracting" does not fit the text in all the places it appears.
#Also the phrases "Patients from the same time" , "Inconclusive proof of CRC" needs to be
changed.
#The phrase "Genetic predisposition, IBD, and history of cancer that has metastasized to the
colon or rectum are considered confounding factors as exclusion criteria."  is partly a repetition.
#In paragraph 3.1 what is meant by "had more cases". In the same paragraph the phrase "insulin
consumption" is wrong.
#I think that the Discussion has a lot of room for improvement.
Title: Effect of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Sulfonylurea on Colorectal Cancer Development:
A Case-Control Study
Version: 3 Date: 20 Aug 2024
Reviewer:  Patroklos Katafygiotis
Reviewer's report:
#The paper presents a very interesting topic that has not been studied enough and the conclusions
to date are chaotic.
#I think there are still issues with the style of writing.
#The phrase "chance of contracting" does not fit the text in all the places it appears.
#Also the phrases "Patients from the same time" , "Inconclusive proof of CRC" needs to be
changed.
#The phrase "Genetic predisposition, IBD, and history of cancer that has metastasized to the
colon or rectum are considered confounding factors as exclusion criteria."  is partly a repetition.
#In paragraph 3.1 what is meant by "had more cases". In the same paragraph the phrase "insulin
consumption" is wrong.
#I think that the Discussion has a lot of room for improvement.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Effect of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Sulfonylurea on Colorectal Cancer Development:
A Case-Control Study
Version: 3 Date: 20 Aug 2024
Reviewer:  Patroklos Katafygiotis
Reviewer's report:
#The paper presents a very interesting topic that has not been studied enough and the conclusions
to date are chaotic.
#I think there are still issues with the style of writing.
#The phrase "chance of contracting" does not fit the text in all the places it appears.
#Also the phrases "Patients from the same time" , "Inconclusive proof of CRC" needs to be
changed.
#The phrase "Genetic predisposition, IBD, and history of cancer that has metastasized to the
colon or rectum are considered confounding factors as exclusion criteria."  is partly a repetition.
#In paragraph 3.1 what is meant by "had more cases". In the same paragraph the phrase "insulin
consumption" is wrong.
#I think that the Discussion has a lot of room for improvement.
assistant