Reviewer's report
Title:The impact of MFG-E8 in chronic pancreatitis: potential for future
immunotherapy?
Version: 2Date:28 November 2012
Reviewer: Patrick Yachimski
Reviewer's report:
I still think it would be important to know the tobacco use/smoking status of
subjects, for reasons indicated previously. I do not see that this has been
included. If this information is not available or can not be included, then this
should at least be acknowledged as a limitation in the discussion section of the
manuscript.
The authors have otherwise responded to comments/suggestions in satisfactory
fashion.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:The impact of MFG-E8 in chronic pancreatitis: potential for future
immunotherapy?
Version: 2Date:28 November 2012
Reviewer: Patrick Yachimski
Reviewer's report:
I still think it would be important to know the tobacco use/smoking status of
subjects, for reasons indicated previously. I do not see that this has been
included. If this information is not available or can not be included, then this
should at least be acknowledged as a limitation in the discussion section of the
manuscript.
The authors have otherwise responded to comments/suggestions in satisfactory
fashion.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:The impact of MFG-E8 in chronic pancreatitis: potential for future
immunotherapy?
Version: 2Date:28 November 2012
Reviewer: Patrick Yachimski
Reviewer's report:
I still think it would be important to know the tobacco use/smoking status of
subjects, for reasons indicated previously. I do not see that this has been
included. If this information is not available or can not be included, then this
should at least be acknowledged as a limitation in the discussion section of the
manuscript.
The authors have otherwise responded to comments/suggestions in satisfactory
fashion.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
assistant