Title: Prospective, randomized study comparing two different regimens of split-dose
polyethylene glycol and their effect on endoscopic outcomes
Version: 1 Date: 24 Feb 2024
Reviewer's report:
Comments to the author
This is a prospective, randomized study to compare the efficacy and side effect profile of
two different regimens of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation solution: PEG (3+1) vs. PEG
(2+2), and concluded to recommend the use of (2+2) regimen for its superior efficacy in
bowel cleansing. The study is well designed and the result and conclusion is simple and clear
understanding. The text is also carefully described, and slight correction is desired.
Minor comments
1# A change in the order of the items listed in the table 1. is desirable. Please list the “Age” next to
the “Gender”. Order of the primary and secondary outcome is confusing due to the mixed order,
so it would be better to organize them. Specifically, “Presence of adenoma”, “ileal intubation”,
“Boston bowel preparation score”, should be listed at the bottom.
Title: Prospective, randomized study comparing two different regimens of split-dose
polyethylene glycol and their effect on endoscopic outcomes
Version: 1 Date: 24 Feb 2024
Reviewer's report:
Comments to the author
This is a prospective, randomized study to compare the efficacy and side effect profile of
two different regimens of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation solution: PEG (3+1) vs. PEG
(2+2), and concluded to recommend the use of (2+2) regimen for its superior efficacy in
bowel cleansing. The study is well designed and the result and conclusion is simple and clear
understanding. The text is also carefully described, and slight correction is desired.
Minor comments
1# A change in the order of the items listed in the table 1. is desirable. Please list the “Age” next to
the “Gender”. Order of the primary and secondary outcome is confusing due to the mixed order,
so it would be better to organize them. Specifically, “Presence of adenoma”, “ileal intubation”,
“Boston bowel preparation score”, should be listed at the bottom.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Prospective, randomized study comparing two different regimens of split-dose
polyethylene glycol and their effect on endoscopic outcomes
Version: 1 Date: 24 Feb 2024
Reviewer's report:
Comments to the author
This is a prospective, randomized study to compare the efficacy and side effect profile of
two different regimens of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation solution: PEG (3+1) vs. PEG
(2+2), and concluded to recommend the use of (2+2) regimen for its superior efficacy in
bowel cleansing. The study is well designed and the result and conclusion is simple and clear
understanding. The text is also carefully described, and slight correction is desired.
Minor comments
1# A change in the order of the items listed in the table 1. is desirable. Please list the “Age” next to
the “Gender”. Order of the primary and secondary outcome is confusing due to the mixed order,
so it would be better to organize them. Specifically, “Presence of adenoma”, “ileal intubation”,
“Boston bowel preparation score”, should be listed at the bottom.
assistant