Title: The influence of subjective well-being on anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients
with functional dyspepsia
Version: 2 Date: 10 Mar 2025
Reviewer:  Amir Soliman
Reviewer's report:
The manuscript presents a well-structured and important study on the relationship between SWB
and FD. However, the following minor revisions should be addressed before publication:
1- Clarify the definition and role of SWB in FD.
2- Strengthen the rationale for the study by explicitly stating the research gap.
3- Discuss potential confounders that might have influenced the results.
4- Expand on the clinical implications—how should clinicians act on these findings?
5- Acknowledge reverse causality and low R² values as study limitations.
Title: The influence of subjective well-being on anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients
with functional dyspepsia
Version: 2 Date: 10 Mar 2025
Reviewer:  Amir Soliman
Reviewer's report:
The manuscript presents a well-structured and important study on the relationship between SWB
and FD. However, the following minor revisions should be addressed before publication:
1- Clarify the definition and role of SWB in FD.
2- Strengthen the rationale for the study by explicitly stating the research gap.
3- Discuss potential confounders that might have influenced the results.
4- Expand on the clinical implications—how should clinicians act on these findings?
5- Acknowledge reverse causality and low R² values as study limitations.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: The influence of subjective well-being on anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients
with functional dyspepsia
Version: 2 Date: 10 Mar 2025
Reviewer:  Amir Soliman
Reviewer's report:
The manuscript presents a well-structured and important study on the relationship between SWB
and FD. However, the following minor revisions should be addressed before publication:
1- Clarify the definition and role of SWB in FD.
2- Strengthen the rationale for the study by explicitly stating the research gap.
3- Discuss potential confounders that might have influenced the results.
4- Expand on the clinical implications—how should clinicians act on these findings?
5- Acknowledge reverse causality and low R² values as study limitations.
assistant