Reviewer's report
Title:A pilot study of individualized comprehensive treatment for gastric cancer
with para-aortic lymph node metastases
Version:5Date:23 October 2015
Reviewer: Christoph Elsing
Reviewer's report:
The Quality of the manuscript has clearly improved.
There are however still numerous essential Errors. The Treatment protocoll
described in the method section of the Abstract (line 40) is different to the
protocoll described in the text (122). This is not acceptable. And again there are
some incomplete sentences (line 85). This should be corrected.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
Reviewer's report
Title:A pilot study of individualized comprehensive treatment for gastric cancer
with para-aortic lymph node metastases
Version:5Date:23 October 2015
Reviewer: Christoph Elsing
Reviewer's report:
The Quality of the manuscript has clearly improved.
There are however still numerous essential Errors. The Treatment protocoll
described in the method section of the Abstract (line 40) is different to the
protocoll described in the text (122). This is not acceptable. And again there are
some incomplete sentences (line 85). This should be corrected.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:A pilot study of individualized comprehensive treatment for gastric cancer
with para-aortic lymph node metastases
Version:5Date:23 October 2015
Reviewer: Christoph Elsing
Reviewer's report:
The Quality of the manuscript has clearly improved.
There are however still numerous essential Errors. The Treatment protocoll
described in the method section of the Abstract (line 40) is different to the
protocoll described in the text (122). This is not acceptable. And again there are
some incomplete sentences (line 85). This should be corrected.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
assistant