Title: Construction of a novel signature based on immune-related lncRNA to identify high and
low risk pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients
Version: 2 Date: 19 Jun 2023
Reviewer's report:
The author's revisions to other reviewers have improved the quality of this article, making it
possible to meet publication requirements. Some key issues need to be clarified.
1. However, I noticed that some of the figures have a low resolution which makes them hard
to read. I would suggest that the authors increase the resolution of these figures, which would
make them easier to read and understand. This would also make it easier for readers to fully
understand the results and make use of it. I believe that increasing the resolution of these figures
would greatly improve the manuscript.
2. This study was conducted based on open-accessed data. Some previous studies have
used similar bioinformatics or statistical methods. Although it will lose some innovation,
I think it will benefit the reader if the authors could include the following references,
which would provide readers with a more complete understanding of the whole study: doi:
10.1177/10732748221129451; doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.627508; doi: 10.18632/aging.202558;
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.844709.
3. Detailed description of all method section is required.
4. State the * and statistic value in the method section or otherwise mention in every figure
legend. e.g., *p>0.05.
5. Check the reference style and abbreviation of journals.
6. Some typos are there; rectify those (Minor).
7. The relationship between immune cell infiltration and specific pathways should be well
discussed in the relevant section.
Title: Construction of a novel signature based on immune-related lncRNA to identify high and
low risk pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients
Version: 2 Date: 19 Jun 2023
Reviewer's report:
The author's revisions to other reviewers have improved the quality of this article, making it
possible to meet publication requirements. Some key issues need to be clarified.
1. However, I noticed that some of the figures have a low resolution which makes them hard
to read. I would suggest that the authors increase the resolution of these figures, which would
make them easier to read and understand. This would also make it easier for readers to fully
understand the results and make use of it. I believe that increasing the resolution of these figures
would greatly improve the manuscript.
2. This study was conducted based on open-accessed data. Some previous studies have
used similar bioinformatics or statistical methods. Although it will lose some innovation,
I think it will benefit the reader if the authors could include the following references,
which would provide readers with a more complete understanding of the whole study: doi:
10.1177/10732748221129451; doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.627508; doi: 10.18632/aging.202558;
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.844709.
3. Detailed description of all method section is required.
4. State the * and statistic value in the method section or otherwise mention in every figure
legend. e.g., *p>0.05.
5. Check the reference style and abbreviation of journals.
6. Some typos are there; rectify those (Minor).
7. The relationship between immune cell infiltration and specific pathways should be well
discussed in the relevant section.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Construction of a novel signature based on immune-related lncRNA to identify high and
low risk pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients
Version: 2 Date: 19 Jun 2023
Reviewer's report:
The author's revisions to other reviewers have improved the quality of this article, making it
possible to meet publication requirements. Some key issues need to be clarified.
1. However, I noticed that some of the figures have a low resolution which makes them hard
to read. I would suggest that the authors increase the resolution of these figures, which would
make them easier to read and understand. This would also make it easier for readers to fully
understand the results and make use of it. I believe that increasing the resolution of these figures
would greatly improve the manuscript.
2. This study was conducted based on open-accessed data. Some previous studies have
used similar bioinformatics or statistical methods. Although it will lose some innovation,
I think it will benefit the reader if the authors could include the following references,
which would provide readers with a more complete understanding of the whole study: doi:
10.1177/10732748221129451; doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.627508; doi: 10.18632/aging.202558;
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.844709.
3. Detailed description of all method section is required.
4. State the * and statistic value in the method section or otherwise mention in every figure
legend. e.g., *p>0.05.
5. Check the reference style and abbreviation of journals.
6. Some typos are there; rectify those (Minor).
7. The relationship between immune cell infiltration and specific pathways should be well
discussed in the relevant section.
assistant