Title: Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety of Ventral Caudal Artery Access for Transarterial
Chemoembolization in a Rat Hepatocellular Carcinoma Model
Version: 1 Date: 14 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
Dear authors, the paper is clear, nicely written and complete both in the materials and methods
and results.
Just some information I would suggest to add:
1) Authors mention operator's experience; were all the procedures performed by the same
operator? Was the same operator in charge of both artery exposure and hepatic artery
catheterization?
2) In the discussion, would it be possible to add mean reporting time required for catheterization
using different approaches?
Title: Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety of Ventral Caudal Artery Access for Transarterial
Chemoembolization in a Rat Hepatocellular Carcinoma Model
Version: 1 Date: 14 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
Dear authors, the paper is clear, nicely written and complete both in the materials and methods
and results.
Just some information I would suggest to add:
1) Authors mention operator's experience; were all the procedures performed by the same
operator? Was the same operator in charge of both artery exposure and hepatic artery
catheterization?
2) In the discussion, would it be possible to add mean reporting time required for catheterization
using different approaches?
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety of Ventral Caudal Artery Access for Transarterial
Chemoembolization in a Rat Hepatocellular Carcinoma Model
Version: 1 Date: 14 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
Dear authors, the paper is clear, nicely written and complete both in the materials and methods
and results.
Just some information I would suggest to add:
1) Authors mention operator's experience; were all the procedures performed by the same
operator? Was the same operator in charge of both artery exposure and hepatic artery
catheterization?
2) In the discussion, would it be possible to add mean reporting time required for catheterization
using different approaches?
assistant