Title: Optimization of Electrode Position in Electric Field Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Version: 3 Date: 17 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
The authors have made essential modifications in response to the questions and suggestions
raised. These changes are necessary and have significantly enhanced the quality of the
manuscript. The methods section now includes more comprehensive experimental details,
the presentation of results is more logical, and the discussion more thoroughly explores the
implications of the findings.
Given the successful incorporation of the requested revisions, I believe the manuscript now
meets the required standards for publication. It presents valuable insights and contributions to
the field.
I recommend that this manuscript be accepted for publication in its current form.
Title: Optimization of Electrode Position in Electric Field Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Version: 3 Date: 17 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
The authors have made essential modifications in response to the questions and suggestions
raised. These changes are necessary and have significantly enhanced the quality of the
manuscript. The methods section now includes more comprehensive experimental details,
the presentation of results is more logical, and the discussion more thoroughly explores the
implications of the findings.
Given the successful incorporation of the requested revisions, I believe the manuscript now
meets the required standards for publication. It presents valuable insights and contributions to
the field.
I recommend that this manuscript be accepted for publication in its current form.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Optimization of Electrode Position in Electric Field Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Version: 3 Date: 17 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
The authors have made essential modifications in response to the questions and suggestions
raised. These changes are necessary and have significantly enhanced the quality of the
manuscript. The methods section now includes more comprehensive experimental details,
the presentation of results is more logical, and the discussion more thoroughly explores the
implications of the findings.
Given the successful incorporation of the requested revisions, I believe the manuscript now
meets the required standards for publication. It presents valuable insights and contributions to
the field.
I recommend that this manuscript be accepted for publication in its current form.
assistant