Reviewer's report
Title:The Clinical Presentations Of Ectopic Biliary Drainage To Duodenal Bulbus
And Stomach: Complicated Peptic Ulcer Formation And Recurrent Cholangitis
Attacks
Version: 2Date:9 March 2009
Reviewer: Everson Artifon
Reviewer's report:
This is an article with limited interest to the Journal ,but a suitable for ERCP
readers.The high frequency of "ectopic biliary fistula" cited in the study does not
make sense. Personaly , we have around 4000 ERCPs and until now I have
never seen ectopic biliary fistulas."ECTOPIC BILIARY OPENINGS" should be
changed to "biliary fistula" because the fistula does not need to be classified by
topic or ectopic. The authors should explain why " recurrent attack of cholangitis
determine biliary fistula. The cases should come in a demoghraphic table
facilitating to the readers.
The correct is dilation and not dilatation,then many others words should be
corrected in the text. The text is not too good: some sentences does not make
sense and a native person should take a look in the manuscript.The title is
confusing and too long
Reviewer's report
Title:The Clinical Presentations Of Ectopic Biliary Drainage To Duodenal Bulbus
And Stomach: Complicated Peptic Ulcer Formation And Recurrent Cholangitis
Attacks
Version: 2Date:9 March 2009
Reviewer: Everson Artifon
Reviewer's report:
This is an article with limited interest to the Journal ,but a suitable for ERCP
readers.The high frequency of "ectopic biliary fistula" cited in the study does not
make sense. Personaly , we have around 4000 ERCPs and until now I have
never seen ectopic biliary fistulas."ECTOPIC BILIARY OPENINGS" should be
changed to "biliary fistula" because the fistula does not need to be classified by
topic or ectopic. The authors should explain why " recurrent attack of cholangitis
determine biliary fistula. The cases should come in a demoghraphic table
facilitating to the readers.
The correct is dilation and not dilatation,then many others words should be
corrected in the text. The text is not too good: some sentences does not make
sense and a native person should take a look in the manuscript.The title is
confusing and too long
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:The Clinical Presentations Of Ectopic Biliary Drainage To Duodenal Bulbus
And Stomach: Complicated Peptic Ulcer Formation And Recurrent Cholangitis
Attacks
Version: 2Date:9 March 2009
Reviewer: Everson Artifon
Reviewer's report:
This is an article with limited interest to the Journal ,but a suitable for ERCP
readers.The high frequency of "ectopic biliary fistula" cited in the study does not
make sense. Personaly , we have around 4000 ERCPs and until now I have
never seen ectopic biliary fistulas."ECTOPIC BILIARY OPENINGS" should be
changed to "biliary fistula" because the fistula does not need to be classified by
topic or ectopic. The authors should explain why " recurrent attack of cholangitis
determine biliary fistula. The cases should come in a demoghraphic table
facilitating to the readers.
The correct is dilation and not dilatation,then many others words should be
corrected in the text. The text is not too good: some sentences does not make
sense and a native person should take a look in the manuscript.The title is
confusing and too long
assistant