Title: Different imaging techniques' diagnostic efficacy for Crohn's disease activity and external
validation and comparison of MDCTAs, SES-CD and IBUS-SAS
Version: 1 Date: 23 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
You could shorten the Introduction section, highlighting your article's main advantages and
uniqueness. Also, try to avoid using already-known template information as little as possible.
Why did you choose CDAI as the diagnostic standard? Now, there are various other more
accurate indices. Also, the CDAI system has some limitations.
ECCO-ESGAR guideline: „ Furthermore, the CDAI is not accurate in patients with fistulising or
stenotic behaviour and it is not useful in patients with previous extensive ileocolonic resections
or stoma.“ More than half of your patients had stricturing and penetrating diseases.
Duplicated demographic data in the text and table.
The discussion is illogical and has not stated the reason of the differences with other studies.
The manuscript needs extensive native English editing.
The text lacks coherence.
Title: Different imaging techniques' diagnostic efficacy for Crohn's disease activity and external
validation and comparison of MDCTAs, SES-CD and IBUS-SAS
Version: 1 Date: 23 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
You could shorten the Introduction section, highlighting your article's main advantages and
uniqueness. Also, try to avoid using already-known template information as little as possible.
Why did you choose CDAI as the diagnostic standard? Now, there are various other more
accurate indices. Also, the CDAI system has some limitations.
ECCO-ESGAR guideline: „ Furthermore, the CDAI is not accurate in patients with fistulising or
stenotic behaviour and it is not useful in patients with previous extensive ileocolonic resections
or stoma.“ More than half of your patients had stricturing and penetrating diseases.
Duplicated demographic data in the text and table.
The discussion is illogical and has not stated the reason of the differences with other studies.
The manuscript needs extensive native English editing.
The text lacks coherence.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Different imaging techniques' diagnostic efficacy for Crohn's disease activity and external
validation and comparison of MDCTAs, SES-CD and IBUS-SAS
Version: 1 Date: 23 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
You could shorten the Introduction section, highlighting your article's main advantages and
uniqueness. Also, try to avoid using already-known template information as little as possible.
Why did you choose CDAI as the diagnostic standard? Now, there are various other more
accurate indices. Also, the CDAI system has some limitations.
ECCO-ESGAR guideline: „ Furthermore, the CDAI is not accurate in patients with fistulising or
stenotic behaviour and it is not useful in patients with previous extensive ileocolonic resections
or stoma.“ More than half of your patients had stricturing and penetrating diseases.
Duplicated demographic data in the text and table.
The discussion is illogical and has not stated the reason of the differences with other studies.
The manuscript needs extensive native English editing.
The text lacks coherence.
assistant