Title: Effect of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Sulfonylurea on Colorectal Cancer Development:
A Case-Control Study
Version: 2 Date: 01 Aug 2024
Reviewer's report:
• The authors have studied a very important aspect.
• The research work is really good.
• There are some suggestions for the authors.
• Use a uniform writing style, at some places authors have used Calibri, while at the other Times
writing style is used.
• The authors have grouped the age data into different categories e.g. 45-50, 50-55,
• Did the authors count the 50 years of age two times? shouldn’t it be like 45-50, 51-55?
• Mention the corresponding author separately at the end of all authors’ affiliations.
• Divide the abstract into sections.
• Add keywords.
• In results (3), check the mean (± SD) age of the participants again, as it is mentioned as 63.27
(± 9.80) months.
• Follow the Journal format.
• There are a few grammatical mistakes, recheck the paper.
Title: Effect of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Sulfonylurea on Colorectal Cancer Development:
A Case-Control Study
Version: 2 Date: 01 Aug 2024
Reviewer's report:
• The authors have studied a very important aspect.
• The research work is really good.
• There are some suggestions for the authors.
• Use a uniform writing style, at some places authors have used Calibri, while at the other Times
writing style is used.
• The authors have grouped the age data into different categories e.g. 45-50, 50-55,
• Did the authors count the 50 years of age two times? shouldn’t it be like 45-50, 51-55?
• Mention the corresponding author separately at the end of all authors’ affiliations.
• Divide the abstract into sections.
• Add keywords.
• In results (3), check the mean (± SD) age of the participants again, as it is mentioned as 63.27
(± 9.80) months.
• Follow the Journal format.
• There are a few grammatical mistakes, recheck the paper.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Effect of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Sulfonylurea on Colorectal Cancer Development:
A Case-Control Study
Version: 2 Date: 01 Aug 2024
Reviewer's report:
• The authors have studied a very important aspect.
• The research work is really good.
• There are some suggestions for the authors.
• Use a uniform writing style, at some places authors have used Calibri, while at the other Times
writing style is used.
• The authors have grouped the age data into different categories e.g. 45-50, 50-55,
• Did the authors count the 50 years of age two times? shouldn’t it be like 45-50, 51-55?
• Mention the corresponding author separately at the end of all authors’ affiliations.
• Divide the abstract into sections.
• Add keywords.
• In results (3), check the mean (± SD) age of the participants again, as it is mentioned as 63.27
(± 9.80) months.
• Follow the Journal format.
• There are a few grammatical mistakes, recheck the paper.
assistant