Title: Endo-loop or Interrupted Suture Closure of Gallbladder Remnant During Laparoscopic
Subtotal Cholecystectomy- a Retrospective Analysis of Our Experience at a High-Volume
Centre of Eastern Nepal
Version: 4 Date: 05 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
Dear EditorS,
Subject: Revision Letter for Manuscript Entitled "Endo-loop Versus Interrupted Suture Closure
of Gallbladder Remnant During Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy - A Retrospective
Analysis of Our Experience at a High-Volume Centre of Eastern Nepal"
Dear Editors,
We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to revise our manuscript and thank the reviewers for
their valuable comments and insightful feedback. We have carefully considered the suggestions
provided and made the necessary minimal revisions to further strengthen our study while
maintaining the integrity of our findings.
Summary of Revisions:
1. Clarification of Stump Closure Technique: We have elaborated on the criteria guiding the
selection between interrupted suture closure and endo-loop closure to enhance clarity for the
readers.
2. Incorporation of Relevant Literature: To provide a broader perspective and support our
findings, we have included a citation of the study by Yeti#ir F. Four different laparoscopic
surgical techniques to close the gallbladder remnant/stump after a partial cholecystectomy
for Mirizzi syndrome. J Clin Images Med Case Rep. 2024; 5(12): 3403.which discusses
four different laparoscopic surgical techniques for gallbladder remnant closure. This reference
strengthens the context of our study and highlights its relevance in the ongoing discussion on
optimal stump closure methods in challenging cholecystectomy cases.
3. Minor Language and Formatting Adjustments: Based on editorial feedback, minor
grammatical and typographical corrections have been made to improve readability and flow.
We believe that these minimal revisions further enhance the clarity and impact of our manuscript
while maintaining the rigor of our retrospective analysis. We appreciate your time and
consideration and look forward to your positive response.
Please do not hesitate to reach out should any further modifications be required. Thank you once
again for your support.
Best Regards,
Prof. Dr. Fahri Yeti#ir
Title: Endo-loop or Interrupted Suture Closure of Gallbladder Remnant During Laparoscopic
Subtotal Cholecystectomy- a Retrospective Analysis of Our Experience at a High-Volume
Centre of Eastern Nepal
Version: 4 Date: 05 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
Dear EditorS,
Subject: Revision Letter for Manuscript Entitled "Endo-loop Versus Interrupted Suture Closure
of Gallbladder Remnant During Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy - A Retrospective
Analysis of Our Experience at a High-Volume Centre of Eastern Nepal"
Dear Editors,
We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to revise our manuscript and thank the reviewers for
their valuable comments and insightful feedback. We have carefully considered the suggestions
provided and made the necessary minimal revisions to further strengthen our study while
maintaining the integrity of our findings.
Summary of Revisions:
1. Clarification of Stump Closure Technique: We have elaborated on the criteria guiding the
selection between interrupted suture closure and endo-loop closure to enhance clarity for the
readers.
2. Incorporation of Relevant Literature: To provide a broader perspective and support our
findings, we have included a citation of the study by Yeti#ir F. Four different laparoscopic
surgical techniques to close the gallbladder remnant/stump after a partial cholecystectomy
for Mirizzi syndrome. J Clin Images Med Case Rep. 2024; 5(12): 3403.which discusses
four different laparoscopic surgical techniques for gallbladder remnant closure. This reference
strengthens the context of our study and highlights its relevance in the ongoing discussion on
optimal stump closure methods in challenging cholecystectomy cases.
3. Minor Language and Formatting Adjustments: Based on editorial feedback, minor
grammatical and typographical corrections have been made to improve readability and flow.
We believe that these minimal revisions further enhance the clarity and impact of our manuscript
while maintaining the rigor of our retrospective analysis. We appreciate your time and
consideration and look forward to your positive response.
Please do not hesitate to reach out should any further modifications be required. Thank you once
again for your support.
Best Regards,
Prof. Dr. Fahri Yeti#ir
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Endo-loop or Interrupted Suture Closure of Gallbladder Remnant During Laparoscopic
Subtotal Cholecystectomy- a Retrospective Analysis of Our Experience at a High-Volume
Centre of Eastern Nepal
Version: 4 Date: 05 Mar 2025
Reviewer's report:
Dear EditorS,
Subject: Revision Letter for Manuscript Entitled "Endo-loop Versus Interrupted Suture Closure
of Gallbladder Remnant During Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy - A Retrospective
Analysis of Our Experience at a High-Volume Centre of Eastern Nepal"
Dear Editors,
We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to revise our manuscript and thank the reviewers for
their valuable comments and insightful feedback. We have carefully considered the suggestions
provided and made the necessary minimal revisions to further strengthen our study while
maintaining the integrity of our findings.
Summary of Revisions:
1. Clarification of Stump Closure Technique: We have elaborated on the criteria guiding the
selection between interrupted suture closure and endo-loop closure to enhance clarity for the
readers.
2. Incorporation of Relevant Literature: To provide a broader perspective and support our
findings, we have included a citation of the study by Yeti#ir F. Four different laparoscopic
surgical techniques to close the gallbladder remnant/stump after a partial cholecystectomy
for Mirizzi syndrome. J Clin Images Med Case Rep. 2024; 5(12): 3403.which discusses
four different laparoscopic surgical techniques for gallbladder remnant closure. This reference
strengthens the context of our study and highlights its relevance in the ongoing discussion on
optimal stump closure methods in challenging cholecystectomy cases.
3. Minor Language and Formatting Adjustments: Based on editorial feedback, minor
grammatical and typographical corrections have been made to improve readability and flow.
We believe that these minimal revisions further enhance the clarity and impact of our manuscript
while maintaining the rigor of our retrospective analysis. We appreciate your time and
consideration and look forward to your positive response.
Please do not hesitate to reach out should any further modifications be required. Thank you once
again for your support.
Best Regards,
Prof. Dr. Fahri Yeti#ir
assistant