Title: Efficacy and safety of Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic
cholangial drainage in the treatment of advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
and meta-analysis
Version: 9 Date: 28 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
The author has made revisions to the relevant issues as required, but the "Conclusion" section
still needs to be improved to highlight its guiding value for clinical practice. At present, the
author only provides a brief summary of the results in the conclusion section, and cannot see
what the  clinical significance is. The main conclusion of meta-analysis is to provide guidance
for the selection and implementation of clinical measures, which is crucial.
I have no other suggestions for revision and suggest publishing this article.
Thank you again for the author's patient response.
Title: Efficacy and safety of Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic
cholangial drainage in the treatment of advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
and meta-analysis
Version: 9 Date: 28 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
The author has made revisions to the relevant issues as required, but the "Conclusion" section
still needs to be improved to highlight its guiding value for clinical practice. At present, the
author only provides a brief summary of the results in the conclusion section, and cannot see
what the  clinical significance is. The main conclusion of meta-analysis is to provide guidance
for the selection and implementation of clinical measures, which is crucial.
I have no other suggestions for revision and suggest publishing this article.
Thank you again for the author's patient response.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Efficacy and safety of Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic
cholangial drainage in the treatment of advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
and meta-analysis
Version: 9 Date: 28 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
The author has made revisions to the relevant issues as required, but the "Conclusion" section
still needs to be improved to highlight its guiding value for clinical practice. At present, the
author only provides a brief summary of the results in the conclusion section, and cannot see
what the  clinical significance is. The main conclusion of meta-analysis is to provide guidance
for the selection and implementation of clinical measures, which is crucial.
I have no other suggestions for revision and suggest publishing this article.
Thank you again for the author's patient response.
assistant