Title: Interactive training vs. self-driven training in the prediction of colorectal polyp histology
by trainees using the NICE classification
Version: 1 Date: 05 Feb 2023
Reviewer's report:
This is an interesting comparison study. I feel significant effort has gone into making this study.
However, I feel that some methodologies of this study are ambiguous. I hope that my comment
is very useful for the improvement of the article.
1) There are some studies for endoscopic training comparing self or interactive such as PMID:
30844114, PMID: 28945617, and ref 10. Did this study have different results or findings than
these?
Title: Interactive training vs. self-driven training in the prediction of colorectal polyp histology
by trainees using the NICE classification
Version: 1 Date: 05 Feb 2023
Reviewer's report:
This is an interesting comparison study. I feel significant effort has gone into making this study.
However, I feel that some methodologies of this study are ambiguous. I hope that my comment
is very useful for the improvement of the article.
1) There are some studies for endoscopic training comparing self or interactive such as PMID:
30844114, PMID: 28945617, and ref 10. Did this study have different results or findings than
these?
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Interactive training vs. self-driven training in the prediction of colorectal polyp histology
by trainees using the NICE classification
Version: 1 Date: 05 Feb 2023
Reviewer's report:
This is an interesting comparison study. I feel significant effort has gone into making this study.
However, I feel that some methodologies of this study are ambiguous. I hope that my comment
is very useful for the improvement of the article.
1) There are some studies for endoscopic training comparing self or interactive such as PMID:
30844114, PMID: 28945617, and ref 10. Did this study have different results or findings than
these?
assistant