Title: Short and Long-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Celiac Disease
in a Large Private Practice Setting
Version: 3 Date: 23 Nov 2022
Reviewer:  Mohammad Rostami-nejad
Reviewer's report:
I have read the paper with interest.
Despite the topic is interesting and has value in the research practice, it seems that it has two
major concerns:
1- the number of study group is not good enough therefore the power of study is low
2- the data collection is too old and therefore the reference list is belonged to the last decade.
In my opinion if the authors can improve the patients collection and add the recent referred
patients it could be reviewable otherwise it is rejected in the current format.
Title: Short and Long-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Celiac Disease
in a Large Private Practice Setting
Version: 3 Date: 23 Nov 2022
Reviewer:  Mohammad Rostami-nejad
Reviewer's report:
I have read the paper with interest.
Despite the topic is interesting and has value in the research practice, it seems that it has two
major concerns:
1- the number of study group is not good enough therefore the power of study is low
2- the data collection is too old and therefore the reference list is belonged to the last decade.
In my opinion if the authors can improve the patients collection and add the recent referred
patients it could be reviewable otherwise it is rejected in the current format.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Short and Long-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Celiac Disease
in a Large Private Practice Setting
Version: 3 Date: 23 Nov 2022
Reviewer:  Mohammad Rostami-nejad
Reviewer's report:
I have read the paper with interest.
Despite the topic is interesting and has value in the research practice, it seems that it has two
major concerns:
1- the number of study group is not good enough therefore the power of study is low
2- the data collection is too old and therefore the reference list is belonged to the last decade.
In my opinion if the authors can improve the patients collection and add the recent referred
patients it could be reviewable otherwise it is rejected in the current format.
assistant