Title: Clinical outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after Billroth II
anastomosis: A comparison of gastroscope and duodenoscope
Version: 1 Date: 11 Apr 2025
Reviewer:  Payam Behzadi
Reviewer's report:
Dear Author
Thank you for your manuscript submission. The manuscript is well-designed and well-
presented; however, a revision is needed as below:
1. Please do mention the number of males and females in both groups. Please do mention the
age range of the males and females in both groups.
2. Please do revise the tables content according to the comment #1.
3. Please do add the related statistical analyses according to comment #1.
4. Please do add the results of the  aforementioned statistical analyses to Results section.
5. Please do interpret the added statistical analyses to Discussion section.
6. There are some typo errors within the text.
Title: Clinical outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after Billroth II
anastomosis: A comparison of gastroscope and duodenoscope
Version: 1 Date: 11 Apr 2025
Reviewer:  Payam Behzadi
Reviewer's report:
Dear Author
Thank you for your manuscript submission. The manuscript is well-designed and well-
presented; however, a revision is needed as below:
1. Please do mention the number of males and females in both groups. Please do mention the
age range of the males and females in both groups.
2. Please do revise the tables content according to the comment #1.
3. Please do add the related statistical analyses according to comment #1.
4. Please do add the results of the  aforementioned statistical analyses to Results section.
5. Please do interpret the added statistical analyses to Discussion section.
6. There are some typo errors within the text.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Clinical outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after Billroth II
anastomosis: A comparison of gastroscope and duodenoscope
Version: 1 Date: 11 Apr 2025
Reviewer:  Payam Behzadi
Reviewer's report:
Dear Author
Thank you for your manuscript submission. The manuscript is well-designed and well-
presented; however, a revision is needed as below:
1. Please do mention the number of males and females in both groups. Please do mention the
age range of the males and females in both groups.
2. Please do revise the tables content according to the comment #1.
3. Please do add the related statistical analyses according to comment #1.
4. Please do add the results of the  aforementioned statistical analyses to Results section.
5. Please do interpret the added statistical analyses to Discussion section.
6. There are some typo errors within the text.
assistant