Reviewer's report
Title:High prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux esophagitis in Chinese
patients with chronic liver diseases
Version: 1Date:21 January 2010
Reviewer: Daniel Jaspersen
Reviewer's report:
Major Compulsory Revisions:
Evaluation of Barrett`s esophagus is missing and should be added, if possible.
According to symptoms, the prevalence of NERD in the study patients should be
stated.
Which clinical conclusions should be drawn from the study? This should be
discussed.
Minor Essential Revisions:
Spelling mistakes: Abstract - Conclusions: "GE was more prevalent..." (instead of
"prevalence")
Figure 2: "The relationship..." (instead of "repationship")
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Reviewer's report
Title:High prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux esophagitis in Chinese
patients with chronic liver diseases
Version: 1Date:21 January 2010
Reviewer: Daniel Jaspersen
Reviewer's report:
Major Compulsory Revisions:
Evaluation of Barrett`s esophagus is missing and should be added, if possible.
According to symptoms, the prevalence of NERD in the study patients should be
stated.
Which clinical conclusions should be drawn from the study? This should be
discussed.
Minor Essential Revisions:
Spelling mistakes: Abstract - Conclusions: "GE was more prevalent..." (instead of
"prevalence")
Figure 2: "The relationship..." (instead of "repationship")
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:High prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux esophagitis in Chinese
patients with chronic liver diseases
Version: 1Date:21 January 2010
Reviewer: Daniel Jaspersen
Reviewer's report:
Major Compulsory Revisions:
Evaluation of Barrett`s esophagus is missing and should be added, if possible.
According to symptoms, the prevalence of NERD in the study patients should be
stated.
Which clinical conclusions should be drawn from the study? This should be
discussed.
Minor Essential Revisions:
Spelling mistakes: Abstract - Conclusions: "GE was more prevalent..." (instead of
"prevalence")
Figure 2: "The relationship..." (instead of "repationship")
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
assistant