Reviewer's report
Title:Comparison of percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation and surgical
resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma
Version: 3Date:13 December 2011
Reviewer: Alfredo Guglielmi
Reviewer's report:
Even if the main bias of the paper remains the retrospective non randomized
study design that can alter the results statistical analysis . The Authors answered
to all the major issue that had been raised and significantly improved the quality
of the manuscript.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
Reviewer's report
Title:Comparison of percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation and surgical
resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma
Version: 3Date:13 December 2011
Reviewer: Alfredo Guglielmi
Reviewer's report:
Even if the main bias of the paper remains the retrospective non randomized
study design that can alter the results statistical analysis . The Authors answered
to all the major issue that had been raised and significantly improved the quality
of the manuscript.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Comparison of percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation and surgical
resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma
Version: 3Date:13 December 2011
Reviewer: Alfredo Guglielmi
Reviewer's report:
Even if the main bias of the paper remains the retrospective non randomized
study design that can alter the results statistical analysis . The Authors answered
to all the major issue that had been raised and significantly improved the quality
of the manuscript.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
assistant