Reviewer's report
Title:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses:
22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles
Version:1Date:25 June 2015
Reviewer: David N. Lewin
Reviewer's report:
No recommendations for change.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, and I have assessed the statistics in my report.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Reviewer's report
Title:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses:
22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles
Version:1Date:25 June 2015
Reviewer: David N. Lewin
Reviewer's report:
No recommendations for change.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, and I have assessed the statistics in my report.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses:
22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles
Version:1Date:25 June 2015
Reviewer: David N. Lewin
Reviewer's report:
No recommendations for change.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, and I have assessed the statistics in my report.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
assistant