Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: The Prognostic Inf luence of Body Mass Index, Resting energy expenditure and Fasting  
Blood Glucose on Postoperative Patients with Esophageal Cancer  
 
Version: 1 Date: 15 Aug 2016  
 
Reviewer: Ho Fuang  
 
Reviewer's report:  
 
Issues of concern seems to be adequately addressed in the author's reply.   
Still multiple editorial mistakes:  
1. Western not western (page 3, 12)  
2. neoplastic cells not "Neoplastic" cells (page 4)  
3. and all patients were excluded either acute or chronic active liver disease (page 6) - what 
does this mean?  - and all patients were screened and excluded from acute and  chronic liver 
disease?  
4. "Observing" the short term outcomes (page 9)  
5. Try highlights the significant values in Table 3, Typo, "All Patients"  
The statistical method seems to me correct and reasonable, but echoing the other reviewer's 
recommendation, f urther statistical checks would add to confidence.  
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work incl ude the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
No 
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to  assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an  
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further  
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
I recommend additi onal statistical review  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Acceptable  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have y ou in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an  
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this  
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an or ganisation that may in any way gain or lose  
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the  
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds  or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial com peting interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below.  If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included  
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report  
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along  with the authors'  
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons  
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments  
which I do not wish to be included in my named report  can be included as confidential comments  
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: The Prognostic Inf luence of Body Mass Index, Resting energy expenditure and Fasting  
Blood Glucose on Postoperative Patients with Esophageal Cancer  
 
Version: 1 Date: 15 Aug 2016  
 
Reviewer: Ho Fuang  
 
Reviewer's report:  
 
Issues of concern seems to be adequately addressed in the author's reply.   
Still multiple editorial mistakes:  
1. Western not western (page 3, 12)  
2. neoplastic cells not "Neoplastic" cells (page 4)  
3. and all patients were excluded either acute or chronic active liver disease (page 6) - what 
does this mean?  - and all patients were screened and excluded from acute and  chronic liver 
disease?  
4. "Observing" the short term outcomes (page 9)  
5. Try highlights the significant values in Table 3, Typo, "All Patients"  
The statistical method seems to me correct and reasonable, but echoing the other reviewer's 
recommendation, f urther statistical checks would add to confidence.  
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work incl ude the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
No 
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to  assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an  
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further  
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
I recommend additi onal statistical review  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Acceptable  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have y ou in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an  
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this  
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an or ganisation that may in any way gain or lose  
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the  
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds  or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial com peting interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below.  If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included  
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report  
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along  with the authors'  
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons  
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments  
which I do not wish to be included in my named report  can be included as confidential comments  
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: The Prognostic Inf luence of Body Mass Index, Resting energy expenditure and Fasting  
Blood Glucose on Postoperative Patients with Esophageal Cancer  
 
Version: 1 Date: 15 Aug 2016  
 
Reviewer: Ho Fuang  
 
Reviewer's report:  
 
Issues of concern seems to be adequately addressed in the author's reply.   
Still multiple editorial mistakes:  
1. Western not western (page 3, 12)  
2. neoplastic cells not "Neoplastic" cells (page 4)  
3. and all patients were excluded either acute or chronic active liver disease (page 6) - what 
does this mean?  - and all patients were screened and excluded from acute and  chronic liver 
disease?  
4. "Observing" the short term outcomes (page 9)  
5. Try highlights the significant values in Table 3, Typo, "All Patients"  
The statistical method seems to me correct and reasonable, but echoing the other reviewer's 
recommendation, f urther statistical checks would add to confidence.  
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work incl ude the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
No 
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to  assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an  
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further  
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
I recommend additi onal statistical review  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Acceptable  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have y ou in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an  
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this  
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an or ganisation that may in any way gain or lose  
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the  
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds  or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial com peting interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below.  If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included  
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report  
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along  with the authors'  
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons  
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments  
which I do not wish to be included in my named report  can be included as confidential comments  
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
assistant