Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title:  Fitz-Hugh Curtis syndrome associated with tuberculous salpingitis and peritonitis: a case 
presentation and review of literature  
 
Version: 0 Date: 12 Nov 2017 
 
Reviewer:  Chandirasegaran  Chandirasegaran  
 
Reviewer’s report:  
 
Re: Fitz -Hugh -Curtis syndrome associated with tuberculous salpingi tis and peritonitis:  
 
A case presentation and review of literature by Laura and Frederik.  
 
The authors present a case of Fitz -Hugh -Curtis syndrome, associated with tuberculous sapingitis 
and peritonitis. Overall, the report is well -written and presented su ccinctly. Even though, similar 
case reports have been reported earlier from several different investigators, the authors claim that 
this case was associated with ascites, which, was unique and not reported earlier. The case report 
adds to the existing lite rature if published in BMC Gateroenterology. The authors are asked to 
note the following concerns as noted below:  
 
1. Retroperitoneal lymph node biopsy is something that the authors did not consider before 
performing a laparoscopy. Since, laparoscopy may n ot be feasible in all the cases, is there 
any specific reason for avoiding the retroperitoneal lymph node biopsy to look for 
tuberculous nodules in this case?  
 
2. Figure 1 a, b: Indicate the lesions using arrow heads. What does 'H' indicate in figure 1a?  
 
3. Figures, 2 and 3: Since, both these figures represent almost the same lesions, authors 
should make these as a single figure. Or, instead delete figure 3.  
 
4. Page 2, line 19, typo: 'tuberculine' should be 'tuberculin'.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Unable to assess  
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Accepta ble 
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or  shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the 
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you re ceived reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests.  
 
I agree to the open pee r review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the autho rs' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do  not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title:  Fitz-Hugh Curtis syndrome associated with tuberculous salpingitis and peritonitis: a case 
presentation and review of literature  
 
Version: 0 Date: 12 Nov 2017 
 
Reviewer:  Chandirasegaran  Chandirasegaran  
 
Reviewer’s report:  
 
Re: Fitz -Hugh -Curtis syndrome associated with tuberculous salpingi tis and peritonitis:  
 
A case presentation and review of literature by Laura and Frederik.  
 
The authors present a case of Fitz -Hugh -Curtis syndrome, associated with tuberculous sapingitis 
and peritonitis. Overall, the report is well -written and presented su ccinctly. Even though, similar 
case reports have been reported earlier from several different investigators, the authors claim that 
this case was associated with ascites, which, was unique and not reported earlier. The case report 
adds to the existing lite rature if published in BMC Gateroenterology. The authors are asked to 
note the following concerns as noted below:  
 
1. Retroperitoneal lymph node biopsy is something that the authors did not consider before 
performing a laparoscopy. Since, laparoscopy may n ot be feasible in all the cases, is there 
any specific reason for avoiding the retroperitoneal lymph node biopsy to look for 
tuberculous nodules in this case?  
 
2. Figure 1 a, b: Indicate the lesions using arrow heads. What does 'H' indicate in figure 1a?  
 
3. Figures, 2 and 3: Since, both these figures represent almost the same lesions, authors 
should make these as a single figure. Or, instead delete figure 3.  
 
4. Page 2, line 19, typo: 'tuberculine' should be 'tuberculin'.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Unable to assess  
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Accepta ble 
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or  shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the 
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you re ceived reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests.  
 
I agree to the open pee r review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the autho rs' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do  not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title:  Fitz-Hugh Curtis syndrome associated with tuberculous salpingitis and peritonitis: a case 
presentation and review of literature  
 
Version: 0 Date: 12 Nov 2017 
 
Reviewer:  Chandirasegaran  Chandirasegaran  
 
Reviewer’s report:  
 
Re: Fitz -Hugh -Curtis syndrome associated with tuberculous salpingi tis and peritonitis:  
 
A case presentation and review of literature by Laura and Frederik.  
 
The authors present a case of Fitz -Hugh -Curtis syndrome, associated with tuberculous sapingitis 
and peritonitis. Overall, the report is well -written and presented su ccinctly. Even though, similar 
case reports have been reported earlier from several different investigators, the authors claim that 
this case was associated with ascites, which, was unique and not reported earlier. The case report 
adds to the existing lite rature if published in BMC Gateroenterology. The authors are asked to 
note the following concerns as noted below:  
 
1. Retroperitoneal lymph node biopsy is something that the authors did not consider before 
performing a laparoscopy. Since, laparoscopy may n ot be feasible in all the cases, is there 
any specific reason for avoiding the retroperitoneal lymph node biopsy to look for 
tuberculous nodules in this case?  
 
2. Figure 1 a, b: Indicate the lesions using arrow heads. What does 'H' indicate in figure 1a?  
 
3. Figures, 2 and 3: Since, both these figures represent almost the same lesions, authors 
should make these as a single figure. Or, instead delete figure 3.  
 
4. Page 2, line 19, typo: 'tuberculine' should be 'tuberculin'.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Unable to assess  
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Accepta ble 
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or  shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the 
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you re ceived reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests.  
 
I agree to the open pee r review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the autho rs' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do  not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
assistant