Title: Proton pump inhibitor therapy after transcatheter angiography in refractory nonvariceal
acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients#a cohort study
Version: 2 Date: 22 Feb 2024
Reviewer's report:
Upon reviewing your revised manuscript, I appreciate your efforts in addressing the previous
comments. However, I noticed that most of the limitations identified, stemming from the
retrospective nature of your study, have not been explicitly acknowledged or addressed in the
revised text. It is crucial for the integrity and clarity of scientific research that such limitations
are transparently communicated within the manuscript. This ensures that the readers have
a complete understanding of the context and scope of the findings. In its current form, the
manuscript does not sufficiently meet this criterion. Therefore, I find it challenging to endorse
its acceptance at this stage.
Title: Proton pump inhibitor therapy after transcatheter angiography in refractory nonvariceal
acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients#a cohort study
Version: 2 Date: 22 Feb 2024
Reviewer's report:
Upon reviewing your revised manuscript, I appreciate your efforts in addressing the previous
comments. However, I noticed that most of the limitations identified, stemming from the
retrospective nature of your study, have not been explicitly acknowledged or addressed in the
revised text. It is crucial for the integrity and clarity of scientific research that such limitations
are transparently communicated within the manuscript. This ensures that the readers have
a complete understanding of the context and scope of the findings. In its current form, the
manuscript does not sufficiently meet this criterion. Therefore, I find it challenging to endorse
its acceptance at this stage.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Proton pump inhibitor therapy after transcatheter angiography in refractory nonvariceal
acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients#a cohort study
Version: 2 Date: 22 Feb 2024
Reviewer's report:
Upon reviewing your revised manuscript, I appreciate your efforts in addressing the previous
comments. However, I noticed that most of the limitations identified, stemming from the
retrospective nature of your study, have not been explicitly acknowledged or addressed in the
revised text. It is crucial for the integrity and clarity of scientific research that such limitations
are transparently communicated within the manuscript. This ensures that the readers have
a complete understanding of the context and scope of the findings. In its current form, the
manuscript does not sufficiently meet this criterion. Therefore, I find it challenging to endorse
its acceptance at this stage.
assistant