Title: The Association between Non- and Pro-Healthy Diet Indices and the Risk of Colorectal
Cancer: A Case-Control Study
Version: 1 Date: 17 Oct 2024
Reviewer:  Alejandro Oncina-Cánovas
Reviewer's report:
Good job! The article has improved significantly. However, some of the points I raised or
questions I asked remain unaddressed. I list them below with an extra point:
- If you don't have more details about the diagnosis, maybe yo can add an additional limitation
to address this concern.
- You didn't answer these questions:
Why you use these covariables for the adjusted model and not others? Please provide a
justification. Did you consider examining the association using these indices as continuous
variables? This would provide valuable insights.
New question:
- It would be preferable to focus on the results from more adjusted models (omit results from
unadjasted or crude models).
Title: The Association between Non- and Pro-Healthy Diet Indices and the Risk of Colorectal
Cancer: A Case-Control Study
Version: 1 Date: 17 Oct 2024
Reviewer:  Alejandro Oncina-Cánovas
Reviewer's report:
Good job! The article has improved significantly. However, some of the points I raised or
questions I asked remain unaddressed. I list them below with an extra point:
- If you don't have more details about the diagnosis, maybe yo can add an additional limitation
to address this concern.
- You didn't answer these questions:
Why you use these covariables for the adjusted model and not others? Please provide a
justification. Did you consider examining the association using these indices as continuous
variables? This would provide valuable insights.
New question:
- It would be preferable to focus on the results from more adjusted models (omit results from
unadjasted or crude models).
Please review this paper.
user
Title: The Association between Non- and Pro-Healthy Diet Indices and the Risk of Colorectal
Cancer: A Case-Control Study
Version: 1 Date: 17 Oct 2024
Reviewer:  Alejandro Oncina-Cánovas
Reviewer's report:
Good job! The article has improved significantly. However, some of the points I raised or
questions I asked remain unaddressed. I list them below with an extra point:
- If you don't have more details about the diagnosis, maybe yo can add an additional limitation
to address this concern.
- You didn't answer these questions:
Why you use these covariables for the adjusted model and not others? Please provide a
justification. Did you consider examining the association using these indices as continuous
variables? This would provide valuable insights.
New question:
- It would be preferable to focus on the results from more adjusted models (omit results from
unadjasted or crude models).
assistant