Title: A colonial serrated polyp classification model using white-light ordinary endoscopy
images with an artificial intelligence model and TensorFlow chart
Version: 3 Date: 18 Jan 2024
Reviewer's report:
Although the authors have done really nice job for the chosen research problem but still the
incorporation of the following points will help in enhancing its quality:
1. There is very less information and discussion about the novelty proposed in the manuscript.
Please focus only on the novelty proposed if any.
2. There is no comparison done with the any State-Of-Art methodologies present in the literature
specifically proposed for the chosen research problem. Please include few of them (mainly of
2022 and 2023) otherwise how would we come to know that there is no biasness is there in
your paper and your proposed methodology has surpassed other proposed techniques. And this
comparison should be done in tabular form after applying them on your datasets or applying
your methodology for the dataset given in them.
3. Please clearly depict the USP and significance of your research work for the chosen research
problem.
4. In section 5 of Conclusion, there is no information given regarding the Limitations and future
work for the proposed methodology. Please include it.
Title: A colonial serrated polyp classification model using white-light ordinary endoscopy
images with an artificial intelligence model and TensorFlow chart
Version: 3 Date: 18 Jan 2024
Reviewer's report:
Although the authors have done really nice job for the chosen research problem but still the
incorporation of the following points will help in enhancing its quality:
1. There is very less information and discussion about the novelty proposed in the manuscript.
Please focus only on the novelty proposed if any.
2. There is no comparison done with the any State-Of-Art methodologies present in the literature
specifically proposed for the chosen research problem. Please include few of them (mainly of
2022 and 2023) otherwise how would we come to know that there is no biasness is there in
your paper and your proposed methodology has surpassed other proposed techniques. And this
comparison should be done in tabular form after applying them on your datasets or applying
your methodology for the dataset given in them.
3. Please clearly depict the USP and significance of your research work for the chosen research
problem.
4. In section 5 of Conclusion, there is no information given regarding the Limitations and future
work for the proposed methodology. Please include it.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: A colonial serrated polyp classification model using white-light ordinary endoscopy
images with an artificial intelligence model and TensorFlow chart
Version: 3 Date: 18 Jan 2024
Reviewer's report:
Although the authors have done really nice job for the chosen research problem but still the
incorporation of the following points will help in enhancing its quality:
1. There is very less information and discussion about the novelty proposed in the manuscript.
Please focus only on the novelty proposed if any.
2. There is no comparison done with the any State-Of-Art methodologies present in the literature
specifically proposed for the chosen research problem. Please include few of them (mainly of
2022 and 2023) otherwise how would we come to know that there is no biasness is there in
your paper and your proposed methodology has surpassed other proposed techniques. And this
comparison should be done in tabular form after applying them on your datasets or applying
your methodology for the dataset given in them.
3. Please clearly depict the USP and significance of your research work for the chosen research
problem.
4. In section 5 of Conclusion, there is no information given regarding the Limitations and future
work for the proposed methodology. Please include it.
assistant