Title: Preoperative ALBI grade predicts the outcomes in non-B non-C HCC patients undergoing
primary curative resection
Version: 4 Date: 07 Jun 2021
Reviewer's report:
This paper has been well revised for the prior problems, which may qualify for publication in
this journal. But there are still some new problems. Some comments are listed as follows:
1. In the result section of the text, the word description regarding exclusion criteria is repeated
with that of Figure 1.  These words had better be deleted .
2. The expression of numbers should be consistent in the paper. For example, the sentences,
“Sixty-six, 98, and 4 patients had ALBI grade I, II, and III, respectively”, “Fifty-eight patients
(34.5%) had diabetes mellitus (DM)” and so on should be further revised. In general, #10 is
expressed in English, while >10 is expressed in Arabic number.
Title: Preoperative ALBI grade predicts the outcomes in non-B non-C HCC patients undergoing
primary curative resection
Version: 4 Date: 07 Jun 2021
Reviewer's report:
This paper has been well revised for the prior problems, which may qualify for publication in
this journal. But there are still some new problems. Some comments are listed as follows:
1. In the result section of the text, the word description regarding exclusion criteria is repeated
with that of Figure 1.  These words had better be deleted .
2. The expression of numbers should be consistent in the paper. For example, the sentences,
“Sixty-six, 98, and 4 patients had ALBI grade I, II, and III, respectively”, “Fifty-eight patients
(34.5%) had diabetes mellitus (DM)” and so on should be further revised. In general, #10 is
expressed in English, while >10 is expressed in Arabic number.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Preoperative ALBI grade predicts the outcomes in non-B non-C HCC patients undergoing
primary curative resection
Version: 4 Date: 07 Jun 2021
Reviewer's report:
This paper has been well revised for the prior problems, which may qualify for publication in
this journal. But there are still some new problems. Some comments are listed as follows:
1. In the result section of the text, the word description regarding exclusion criteria is repeated
with that of Figure 1.  These words had better be deleted .
2. The expression of numbers should be consistent in the paper. For example, the sentences,
“Sixty-six, 98, and 4 patients had ALBI grade I, II, and III, respectively”, “Fifty-eight patients
(34.5%) had diabetes mellitus (DM)” and so on should be further revised. In general, #10 is
expressed in English, while >10 is expressed in Arabic number.
assistant