Reviewer's report
Title:Oral versus intravenous proton pump inhibitors in preventing re-bleeding
for patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic therapy
Version: 2Date:2 April 2012
Reviewer: Nicola de Bortoli
Reviewer's report:
Dear Author
I interestingly red your paper entitled "Oral versus intravenous proton pump
inhibitors in preventing re-bleeding for patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after
successful endoscopic therapy".
It could be considered a well designed and written paper. The results are
interesting and statistic analysis well performed. In your conclusion is well
indicated that these results are interesting but need to be improved in a larger
series of patients.
Future study probably need to be improved with intra-gastric pH study in all
patients (IV versus oral PPI) and probably using a similar PPI (for example
esomeprazole).
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
none.
Reviewer's report
Title:Oral versus intravenous proton pump inhibitors in preventing re-bleeding
for patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic therapy
Version: 2Date:2 April 2012
Reviewer: Nicola de Bortoli
Reviewer's report:
Dear Author
I interestingly red your paper entitled "Oral versus intravenous proton pump
inhibitors in preventing re-bleeding for patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after
successful endoscopic therapy".
It could be considered a well designed and written paper. The results are
interesting and statistic analysis well performed. In your conclusion is well
indicated that these results are interesting but need to be improved in a larger
series of patients.
Future study probably need to be improved with intra-gastric pH study in all
patients (IV versus oral PPI) and probably using a similar PPI (for example
esomeprazole).
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
none.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Oral versus intravenous proton pump inhibitors in preventing re-bleeding
for patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic therapy
Version: 2Date:2 April 2012
Reviewer: Nicola de Bortoli
Reviewer's report:
Dear Author
I interestingly red your paper entitled "Oral versus intravenous proton pump
inhibitors in preventing re-bleeding for patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after
successful endoscopic therapy".
It could be considered a well designed and written paper. The results are
interesting and statistic analysis well performed. In your conclusion is well
indicated that these results are interesting but need to be improved in a larger
series of patients.
Future study probably need to be improved with intra-gastric pH study in all
patients (IV versus oral PPI) and probably using a similar PPI (for example
esomeprazole).
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
none.
assistant