Title: The Short-term Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with His Angle
Reconstruction (LSG-His) on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Version: 4 Date: 22 Jun 2025
Reviewer:  Bradley Schwack
Reviewer's report:
I commend you on an well thought of manuscript--from hypothesis through conclusion I think
this revised manuscript I read is well done.
The uploaded MS Word document of your manuscript (in the editing mode) has been attached to
this review.  On it are mainly (in red) syntax/grammar/style edits as well as particular comments/
suggestions of note.
1. On the upper right of your Word window choose for “Editing”-- editing or reviewing.
2. To the left of the Editing button, please click on “Comments” so my comments appear in the
right margin (associated with the comment bubble icon in the part of the text of your manuscript
to which that comment is referring).
3.  In the Word window, Click on  “Review” which will avail the editing tools—suggest selecting
“Reviewing” to summarize my edits on the R margin and select Tracking (follow all) and  “all
markup” to assure seeing my edits in red.
Should you have any issues accessing the edits or comments or have any questions contact me
(or contact the journal) and we can sort it out.
Aside form the small syntactical and grammatical changes I suggest (please see that attachment),
I do not see any need for any major things to revamp.
This angle of his modification is something that will be verynew to many of the readers--I know
what i read was a 2nd draft after inital review--and I wouldn't require it-but I think the paper
wouldbenefit froma little bit more of a discussion of the recent history of such modifications
in the recent literature (perhaps enhancing your introduction section).  But overall, paper works
and I think it's a job well done.
Thank you very much.
Good luck.
Title: The Short-term Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with His Angle
Reconstruction (LSG-His) on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Version: 4 Date: 22 Jun 2025
Reviewer:  Bradley Schwack
Reviewer's report:
I commend you on an well thought of manuscript--from hypothesis through conclusion I think
this revised manuscript I read is well done.
The uploaded MS Word document of your manuscript (in the editing mode) has been attached to
this review.  On it are mainly (in red) syntax/grammar/style edits as well as particular comments/
suggestions of note.
1. On the upper right of your Word window choose for “Editing”-- editing or reviewing.
2. To the left of the Editing button, please click on “Comments” so my comments appear in the
right margin (associated with the comment bubble icon in the part of the text of your manuscript
to which that comment is referring).
3.  In the Word window, Click on  “Review” which will avail the editing tools—suggest selecting
“Reviewing” to summarize my edits on the R margin and select Tracking (follow all) and  “all
markup” to assure seeing my edits in red.
Should you have any issues accessing the edits or comments or have any questions contact me
(or contact the journal) and we can sort it out.
Aside form the small syntactical and grammatical changes I suggest (please see that attachment),
I do not see any need for any major things to revamp.
This angle of his modification is something that will be verynew to many of the readers--I know
what i read was a 2nd draft after inital review--and I wouldn't require it-but I think the paper
wouldbenefit froma little bit more of a discussion of the recent history of such modifications
in the recent literature (perhaps enhancing your introduction section).  But overall, paper works
and I think it's a job well done.
Thank you very much.
Good luck.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: The Short-term Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with His Angle
Reconstruction (LSG-His) on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Version: 4 Date: 22 Jun 2025
Reviewer:  Bradley Schwack
Reviewer's report:
I commend you on an well thought of manuscript--from hypothesis through conclusion I think
this revised manuscript I read is well done.
The uploaded MS Word document of your manuscript (in the editing mode) has been attached to
this review.  On it are mainly (in red) syntax/grammar/style edits as well as particular comments/
suggestions of note.
1. On the upper right of your Word window choose for “Editing”-- editing or reviewing.
2. To the left of the Editing button, please click on “Comments” so my comments appear in the
right margin (associated with the comment bubble icon in the part of the text of your manuscript
to which that comment is referring).
3.  In the Word window, Click on  “Review” which will avail the editing tools—suggest selecting
“Reviewing” to summarize my edits on the R margin and select Tracking (follow all) and  “all
markup” to assure seeing my edits in red.
Should you have any issues accessing the edits or comments or have any questions contact me
(or contact the journal) and we can sort it out.
Aside form the small syntactical and grammatical changes I suggest (please see that attachment),
I do not see any need for any major things to revamp.
This angle of his modification is something that will be verynew to many of the readers--I know
what i read was a 2nd draft after inital review--and I wouldn't require it-but I think the paper
wouldbenefit froma little bit more of a discussion of the recent history of such modifications
in the recent literature (perhaps enhancing your introduction section).  But overall, paper works
and I think it's a job well done.
Thank you very much.
Good luck.
assistant