Reviewer's report
Title:Afferent signalling from the acid-challenged rat stomach is inhibited and
gastric acid elimination is enhanced by lafutidine
Version: 2Date:5 May 2009
Reviewer: Koji Takeuchi
Reviewer's report:
I have read through the revised manuscript as well as the author’s response to
the reviewer’s inquiries, and found that the authors extensively and successfully
revised the paper by taking the reviewer’s comments into consideration. I also
checked whether the authors revised the text upon considering the comments of
Reviewers 2 and 3. Although the authors did not provide any new data to support
their contention or to refute the reviewer's comments, the responses to their
comments are all nicely accepted. Overall, I think, this paper at its present form is
now recommended for publication in BMC Gastroenterology.
Reviewer's report
Title:Afferent signalling from the acid-challenged rat stomach is inhibited and
gastric acid elimination is enhanced by lafutidine
Version: 2Date:5 May 2009
Reviewer: Koji Takeuchi
Reviewer's report:
I have read through the revised manuscript as well as the author’s response to
the reviewer’s inquiries, and found that the authors extensively and successfully
revised the paper by taking the reviewer’s comments into consideration. I also
checked whether the authors revised the text upon considering the comments of
Reviewers 2 and 3. Although the authors did not provide any new data to support
their contention or to refute the reviewer's comments, the responses to their
comments are all nicely accepted. Overall, I think, this paper at its present form is
now recommended for publication in BMC Gastroenterology.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Afferent signalling from the acid-challenged rat stomach is inhibited and
gastric acid elimination is enhanced by lafutidine
Version: 2Date:5 May 2009
Reviewer: Koji Takeuchi
Reviewer's report:
I have read through the revised manuscript as well as the author’s response to
the reviewer’s inquiries, and found that the authors extensively and successfully
revised the paper by taking the reviewer’s comments into consideration. I also
checked whether the authors revised the text upon considering the comments of
Reviewers 2 and 3. Although the authors did not provide any new data to support
their contention or to refute the reviewer's comments, the responses to their
comments are all nicely accepted. Overall, I think, this paper at its present form is
now recommended for publication in BMC Gastroenterology.
assistant