Title: Birth Characteristics and Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Version: 1 Date: 07 Aug 2024
Reviewer's report:
Dear authors,
Thanks for considering comments.
Your final manuscript is revised according to the most of the reviews. However, there are "still"
some grammatical and spelling errors; Table 1 is not revised yet (adjusted factors and references
are needed).
According to Figure 1 (revised), authors have excluded studies  by "restriction on race/
age/ gender", and also "specific recruitment". These are not among your "exclusion criteria"
according to the method section. The other criteria mentioned in figure 1 (revised), is "short
follow-up", when authors did not specify the length of follow-up for inclusion.
Due to these points and vagueness in text, I think you need a fundamental reconsideration about
your research approach.
Title: Birth Characteristics and Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Version: 1 Date: 07 Aug 2024
Reviewer's report:
Dear authors,
Thanks for considering comments.
Your final manuscript is revised according to the most of the reviews. However, there are "still"
some grammatical and spelling errors; Table 1 is not revised yet (adjusted factors and references
are needed).
According to Figure 1 (revised), authors have excluded studies  by "restriction on race/
age/ gender", and also "specific recruitment". These are not among your "exclusion criteria"
according to the method section. The other criteria mentioned in figure 1 (revised), is "short
follow-up", when authors did not specify the length of follow-up for inclusion.
Due to these points and vagueness in text, I think you need a fundamental reconsideration about
your research approach.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Birth Characteristics and Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Version: 1 Date: 07 Aug 2024
Reviewer's report:
Dear authors,
Thanks for considering comments.
Your final manuscript is revised according to the most of the reviews. However, there are "still"
some grammatical and spelling errors; Table 1 is not revised yet (adjusted factors and references
are needed).
According to Figure 1 (revised), authors have excluded studies  by "restriction on race/
age/ gender", and also "specific recruitment". These are not among your "exclusion criteria"
according to the method section. The other criteria mentioned in figure 1 (revised), is "short
follow-up", when authors did not specify the length of follow-up for inclusion.
Due to these points and vagueness in text, I think you need a fundamental reconsideration about
your research approach.
assistant