Reviewer's report 
 Antioxidant effects of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in rats with advanced liver cirrhosis. Title: 
 5  17 January 2005 Version: Date: 
 Rafael Bruck Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
I am satisfied with the explanations of the authors, and the changes 
they made in the paper. As the authors stated the paper is largely a 
descriptive one and some of the additional experiments suggested are for the the sake of discussion and probably performing them is beyond the scope of this interesting (although largely descriptive) work. Some of 
the suggested experiments will be subject for future studies by the 
authors, as they claimed. Minor change: In the abstract (4th line): severe should be changed to several. 
In conclusion, I recommend to accept the revised paper. 
Reviewer's report 
 Antioxidant effects of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in rats with advanced liver cirrhosis. Title: 
 5  17 January 2005 Version: Date: 
 Rafael Bruck Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
I am satisfied with the explanations of the authors, and the changes 
they made in the paper. As the authors stated the paper is largely a 
descriptive one and some of the additional experiments suggested are for the the sake of discussion and probably performing them is beyond the scope of this interesting (although largely descriptive) work. Some of 
the suggested experiments will be subject for future studies by the 
authors, as they claimed. Minor change: In the abstract (4th line): severe should be changed to several. 
In conclusion, I recommend to accept the revised paper. 
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report 
 Antioxidant effects of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in rats with advanced liver cirrhosis. Title: 
 5  17 January 2005 Version: Date: 
 Rafael Bruck Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
I am satisfied with the explanations of the authors, and the changes 
they made in the paper. As the authors stated the paper is largely a 
descriptive one and some of the additional experiments suggested are for the the sake of discussion and probably performing them is beyond the scope of this interesting (although largely descriptive) work. Some of 
the suggested experiments will be subject for future studies by the 
authors, as they claimed. Minor change: In the abstract (4th line): severe should be changed to several. 
In conclusion, I recommend to accept the revised paper. 
assistant