Reviewer's report
Title:Stoical patients are more likely to have colorectal cancer
Version: 2Date:25 July 2012
Reviewer: Magdalena Esteva
Reviewer's report:
1. I have been reviewing author responses and I consider that most of the issues
have been addressed.
1. Major compulsory revisions
2. Minor essential Revisions
Again I suggest that additional tables 5,6 and 7 be included in the manuscript
and change table 2 by additional table 4 as it is more informative for readers,
gives a more comprehensive scope.
In paragraph 2 of the introduction section, there is a word repeated in line 5 'that'
References: Change complete by Abbreviated name of journals.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, and I have assessed the statistics in my report.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare I have no competing interests
Reviewer's report
Title:Stoical patients are more likely to have colorectal cancer
Version: 2Date:25 July 2012
Reviewer: Magdalena Esteva
Reviewer's report:
1. I have been reviewing author responses and I consider that most of the issues
have been addressed.
1. Major compulsory revisions
2. Minor essential Revisions
Again I suggest that additional tables 5,6 and 7 be included in the manuscript
and change table 2 by additional table 4 as it is more informative for readers,
gives a more comprehensive scope.
In paragraph 2 of the introduction section, there is a word repeated in line 5 'that'
References: Change complete by Abbreviated name of journals.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, and I have assessed the statistics in my report.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare I have no competing interests
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Stoical patients are more likely to have colorectal cancer
Version: 2Date:25 July 2012
Reviewer: Magdalena Esteva
Reviewer's report:
1. I have been reviewing author responses and I consider that most of the issues
have been addressed.
1. Major compulsory revisions
2. Minor essential Revisions
Again I suggest that additional tables 5,6 and 7 be included in the manuscript
and change table 2 by additional table 4 as it is more informative for readers,
gives a more comprehensive scope.
In paragraph 2 of the introduction section, there is a word repeated in line 5 'that'
References: Change complete by Abbreviated name of journals.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, and I have assessed the statistics in my report.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare I have no competing interests
assistant