Reviewer's report
Title:Colorectal cancer screening: Why immunochemical fecal occult blood tests
are the best option.
Version: 1Date:12 November 2012
Reviewer: April Camilla c Roslani
Reviewer's report:
As a debate, this paper is well thought out and written. While the alternative
objectives espoused are often a secondary consideration in planning a screening
programme, the arguments presented provide support for considering them as
primary objectives, and are therefore worthy of publication.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:Colorectal cancer screening: Why immunochemical fecal occult blood tests
are the best option.
Version: 1Date:12 November 2012
Reviewer: April Camilla c Roslani
Reviewer's report:
As a debate, this paper is well thought out and written. While the alternative
objectives espoused are often a secondary consideration in planning a screening
programme, the arguments presented provide support for considering them as
primary objectives, and are therefore worthy of publication.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Colorectal cancer screening: Why immunochemical fecal occult blood tests
are the best option.
Version: 1Date:12 November 2012
Reviewer: April Camilla c Roslani
Reviewer's report:
As a debate, this paper is well thought out and written. While the alternative
objectives espoused are often a secondary consideration in planning a screening
programme, the arguments presented provide support for considering them as
primary objectives, and are therefore worthy of publication.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
assistant