Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: Can microscopic ileitis in patients with clinically suspe cted inflammatory bowel disease 
predict the future?  
 
Version: 2 Date: 27 Jan 2020  
 
Reviewer: Leolin Katsidzira  
 
Reviewer's report:  
The authors have addressed the substantive issues but the manuscript still has some typos, and 
some grammatical issues which can distort the meaning. The authors are advised to go through it 
carefully. I have outlined the instances I have identified w hich require correction:  
1. Under statistical analysis - Page 8, line 7/8 - need correct spelling for continuous, not 
continues. Line 22, remove 'the' where it says 'the all statistical analysis' - and the plural analyses 
should be used.  
2. The value for the mean age and the standard deviations are still reversed on page 9, line 
21 - 15.6 ± 30.8 instead of 30.8 ± 15.6. The authors may want to check this specifically before 
re-submission as they had indicated that they had made the correction.  
3. Page  11,  line 42/43/44 - replace 'merely' with "only those'' &amp;  'developed' with 'were 
diagnosed with'.  
4. Page 11, line 39 - replace 'had' with 'have'.  
 
 
 
Are the methods appropriate and well desc ribed?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manus cript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please speci fy what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
I am able to assess the statistics  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Needs some language corrections before being publ ished  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, f ees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financial ly from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation t hat may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the futu re? 
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents  relating to the content of the  
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have  no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare I have no competing interests  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included  
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted f or publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with th e authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Acc ess Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be in cluded as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: Can microscopic ileitis in patients with clinically suspe cted inflammatory bowel disease 
predict the future?  
 
Version: 2 Date: 27 Jan 2020  
 
Reviewer: Leolin Katsidzira  
 
Reviewer's report:  
The authors have addressed the substantive issues but the manuscript still has some typos, and 
some grammatical issues which can distort the meaning. The authors are advised to go through it 
carefully. I have outlined the instances I have identified w hich require correction:  
1. Under statistical analysis - Page 8, line 7/8 - need correct spelling for continuous, not 
continues. Line 22, remove 'the' where it says 'the all statistical analysis' - and the plural analyses 
should be used.  
2. The value for the mean age and the standard deviations are still reversed on page 9, line 
21 - 15.6 ± 30.8 instead of 30.8 ± 15.6. The authors may want to check this specifically before 
re-submission as they had indicated that they had made the correction.  
3. Page  11,  line 42/43/44 - replace 'merely' with "only those'' &amp;  'developed' with 'were 
diagnosed with'.  
4. Page 11, line 39 - replace 'had' with 'have'.  
 
 
 
Are the methods appropriate and well desc ribed?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manus cript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please speci fy what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
I am able to assess the statistics  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Needs some language corrections before being publ ished  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, f ees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financial ly from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation t hat may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the futu re? 
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents  relating to the content of the  
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have  no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare I have no competing interests  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included  
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted f or publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with th e authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Acc ess Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be in cluded as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: Can microscopic ileitis in patients with clinically suspe cted inflammatory bowel disease 
predict the future?  
 
Version: 2 Date: 27 Jan 2020  
 
Reviewer: Leolin Katsidzira  
 
Reviewer's report:  
The authors have addressed the substantive issues but the manuscript still has some typos, and 
some grammatical issues which can distort the meaning. The authors are advised to go through it 
carefully. I have outlined the instances I have identified w hich require correction:  
1. Under statistical analysis - Page 8, line 7/8 - need correct spelling for continuous, not 
continues. Line 22, remove 'the' where it says 'the all statistical analysis' - and the plural analyses 
should be used.  
2. The value for the mean age and the standard deviations are still reversed on page 9, line 
21 - 15.6 ± 30.8 instead of 30.8 ± 15.6. The authors may want to check this specifically before 
re-submission as they had indicated that they had made the correction.  
3. Page  11,  line 42/43/44 - replace 'merely' with "only those'' &amp;  'developed' with 'were 
diagnosed with'.  
4. Page 11, line 39 - replace 'had' with 'have'.  
 
 
 
Are the methods appropriate and well desc ribed?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manus cript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please speci fy what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
I am able to assess the statistics  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Needs some language corrections before being publ ished  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, f ees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financial ly from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation t hat may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the futu re? 
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents  relating to the content of the  
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have  no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare I have no competing interests  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included  
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted f or publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with th e authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Acc ess Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be in cluded as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
assistant