Reviewer's report
Title:Comparative cost-efficiency of the EVOTECH Endoscope Cleaner and
Reprocessor versus manual cleaning plus automated endoscope reprocessing in
a real-world Canadian hospital endoscopy setting.
Version: 3Date:26 May 2011
Reviewer: Michelle Alfa
Reviewer's report:
I have read the revised manuscript and the response to reviewers comments
provided by the authors. I am satisfied that all my concerns have been addressed
and recommend publication of the revised version of the manuscript.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
Competing interests are the same as in the original review.
Reviewer's report
Title:Comparative cost-efficiency of the EVOTECH Endoscope Cleaner and
Reprocessor versus manual cleaning plus automated endoscope reprocessing in
a real-world Canadian hospital endoscopy setting.
Version: 3Date:26 May 2011
Reviewer: Michelle Alfa
Reviewer's report:
I have read the revised manuscript and the response to reviewers comments
provided by the authors. I am satisfied that all my concerns have been addressed
and recommend publication of the revised version of the manuscript.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
Competing interests are the same as in the original review.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Comparative cost-efficiency of the EVOTECH Endoscope Cleaner and
Reprocessor versus manual cleaning plus automated endoscope reprocessing in
a real-world Canadian hospital endoscopy setting.
Version: 3Date:26 May 2011
Reviewer: Michelle Alfa
Reviewer's report:
I have read the revised manuscript and the response to reviewers comments
provided by the authors. I am satisfied that all my concerns have been addressed
and recommend publication of the revised version of the manuscript.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
Competing interests are the same as in the original review.
assistant