Reviewer's report
Title:Type V pit pattern: Impact of clinical experience and magnifying
chromoendoscopy
Version:3Date:17 February 2014
Reviewer: Naoto Tamai
Reviewer's report:
This article accesses diagnostic value of magnifying endoscopy for the
experienced and non-experienced endoscopist. This article is well written and
informative, and I cannot find the vital problems for publication. Please consider
minor revision as below.
#Figure 2 is difficult to figure out; therefore the authors should avoid using
abbreviation or add more information on figure legend (CCS? MCE? ).
Level of interest: An article of outstanding merit and interest in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:Type V pit pattern: Impact of clinical experience and magnifying
chromoendoscopy
Version:3Date:17 February 2014
Reviewer: Naoto Tamai
Reviewer's report:
This article accesses diagnostic value of magnifying endoscopy for the
experienced and non-experienced endoscopist. This article is well written and
informative, and I cannot find the vital problems for publication. Please consider
minor revision as below.
#Figure 2 is difficult to figure out; therefore the authors should avoid using
abbreviation or add more information on figure legend (CCS? MCE? ).
Level of interest: An article of outstanding merit and interest in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Type V pit pattern: Impact of clinical experience and magnifying
chromoendoscopy
Version:3Date:17 February 2014
Reviewer: Naoto Tamai
Reviewer's report:
This article accesses diagnostic value of magnifying endoscopy for the
experienced and non-experienced endoscopist. This article is well written and
informative, and I cannot find the vital problems for publication. Please consider
minor revision as below.
#Figure 2 is difficult to figure out; therefore the authors should avoid using
abbreviation or add more information on figure legend (CCS? MCE? ).
Level of interest: An article of outstanding merit and interest in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
assistant