Title: An evidence-based nursing practice affects stress state, coagulation and complications in
patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department
Version: 2 Date: 30 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
While the manuscript is potentially of interest to readers, there are several aspects that need
attention.
Title:
Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title.
Add quality of life in the title.
Abstract:
In the method section, add the type of study and type of randomisation.
Report actual P values.
Introduction:
What was the gap, problem or reason for conducting research?
Methods:
In the method section, add the type of study.
Add the following sentences to the results section.
“In the experimental groups, there were 31 man and 29 women, the minimum age was 35 years
old, the maximum age was 71 years old, and the mean age of them was 53.00±18.50 years old;
moreover, the average onset time was 11.00±8.00 h ranged from 2 to 20 h. Furthermore, the
experimental groups consisted of 15 cases with hematemesis, 26 cases with black stool, and
19 cases with hematemesis with black stool. In the reference groups, 25 man and 35 women
were included. Patients in the reference groups were 36-72 years old, with an average age of
54.00±19.00 years old. Moreover, the mean onset time of patients in reference groups was
12.00±9.00 h ranging from 3 to 21 h. In addition, 12 cases with hematemesis, 30 cases with black
stool, 18 cases with hematemesis with black stool were involved in the reference groups. There
was no significant difference in age, gender, and disease symptoms between the two groups (P
> 0.05).”
No explanation has been provided regarding the details of randomization.
Please provide some references to the intervention section regarding your intervention.
Has the educational content been approved by the relevant experts?
Were the patients' values and preferences considered in the intervention group?
How long after the intervention were the tests taken?
Explain the validity and reliability of the data collection tools.
Instead of writing “other complications”, mention all the complications under consideration.
Detailed statistical analysis methods needs to be added to methods.
Results:
Add a table showing baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for each group.
It is necessary to add both Intra-group and inter-group comparison of the means of the variables.
Discussion:
Delete the first paragraph of the discussion section.
It is better to organize the key elements of discussion section into distinct paragraphs. The first
paragraph should baldly state the key findings of your research. The middle portion should
consist of the body of the discussion. This section interprets the important results, explains how
your results is similar to or different from those that have been published previously. The final
paragraph should include a ‘take home message’ and point to future directions for investigation
that have resulted from this study.
The weaknesses and strengths of the study should be written in the discussion section.
Title: An evidence-based nursing practice affects stress state, coagulation and complications in
patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department
Version: 2 Date: 30 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
While the manuscript is potentially of interest to readers, there are several aspects that need
attention.
Title:
Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title.
Add quality of life in the title.
Abstract:
In the method section, add the type of study and type of randomisation.
Report actual P values.
Introduction:
What was the gap, problem or reason for conducting research?
Methods:
In the method section, add the type of study.
Add the following sentences to the results section.
“In the experimental groups, there were 31 man and 29 women, the minimum age was 35 years
old, the maximum age was 71 years old, and the mean age of them was 53.00±18.50 years old;
moreover, the average onset time was 11.00±8.00 h ranged from 2 to 20 h. Furthermore, the
experimental groups consisted of 15 cases with hematemesis, 26 cases with black stool, and
19 cases with hematemesis with black stool. In the reference groups, 25 man and 35 women
were included. Patients in the reference groups were 36-72 years old, with an average age of
54.00±19.00 years old. Moreover, the mean onset time of patients in reference groups was
12.00±9.00 h ranging from 3 to 21 h. In addition, 12 cases with hematemesis, 30 cases with black
stool, 18 cases with hematemesis with black stool were involved in the reference groups. There
was no significant difference in age, gender, and disease symptoms between the two groups (P
> 0.05).”
No explanation has been provided regarding the details of randomization.
Please provide some references to the intervention section regarding your intervention.
Has the educational content been approved by the relevant experts?
Were the patients' values and preferences considered in the intervention group?
How long after the intervention were the tests taken?
Explain the validity and reliability of the data collection tools.
Instead of writing “other complications”, mention all the complications under consideration.
Detailed statistical analysis methods needs to be added to methods.
Results:
Add a table showing baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for each group.
It is necessary to add both Intra-group and inter-group comparison of the means of the variables.
Discussion:
Delete the first paragraph of the discussion section.
It is better to organize the key elements of discussion section into distinct paragraphs. The first
paragraph should baldly state the key findings of your research. The middle portion should
consist of the body of the discussion. This section interprets the important results, explains how
your results is similar to or different from those that have been published previously. The final
paragraph should include a ‘take home message’ and point to future directions for investigation
that have resulted from this study.
The weaknesses and strengths of the study should be written in the discussion section.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: An evidence-based nursing practice affects stress state, coagulation and complications in
patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department
Version: 2 Date: 30 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
While the manuscript is potentially of interest to readers, there are several aspects that need
attention.
Title:
Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title.
Add quality of life in the title.
Abstract:
In the method section, add the type of study and type of randomisation.
Report actual P values.
Introduction:
What was the gap, problem or reason for conducting research?
Methods:
In the method section, add the type of study.
Add the following sentences to the results section.
“In the experimental groups, there were 31 man and 29 women, the minimum age was 35 years
old, the maximum age was 71 years old, and the mean age of them was 53.00±18.50 years old;
moreover, the average onset time was 11.00±8.00 h ranged from 2 to 20 h. Furthermore, the
experimental groups consisted of 15 cases with hematemesis, 26 cases with black stool, and
19 cases with hematemesis with black stool. In the reference groups, 25 man and 35 women
were included. Patients in the reference groups were 36-72 years old, with an average age of
54.00±19.00 years old. Moreover, the mean onset time of patients in reference groups was
12.00±9.00 h ranging from 3 to 21 h. In addition, 12 cases with hematemesis, 30 cases with black
stool, 18 cases with hematemesis with black stool were involved in the reference groups. There
was no significant difference in age, gender, and disease symptoms between the two groups (P
> 0.05).”
No explanation has been provided regarding the details of randomization.
Please provide some references to the intervention section regarding your intervention.
Has the educational content been approved by the relevant experts?
Were the patients' values and preferences considered in the intervention group?
How long after the intervention were the tests taken?
Explain the validity and reliability of the data collection tools.
Instead of writing “other complications”, mention all the complications under consideration.
Detailed statistical analysis methods needs to be added to methods.
Results:
Add a table showing baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for each group.
It is necessary to add both Intra-group and inter-group comparison of the means of the variables.
Discussion:
Delete the first paragraph of the discussion section.
It is better to organize the key elements of discussion section into distinct paragraphs. The first
paragraph should baldly state the key findings of your research. The middle portion should
consist of the body of the discussion. This section interprets the important results, explains how
your results is similar to or different from those that have been published previously. The final
paragraph should include a ‘take home message’ and point to future directions for investigation
that have resulted from this study.
The weaknesses and strengths of the study should be written in the discussion section.
assistant