Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title:  WIRSUNG ATRAUMATIC RUPTURE IN PATIENT WITH PANCREATIC 
PSEUDOCYSTS. A CASE PR ESENTATION  
 
Version: 1 Date: 30 Mar 2018 
 
Reviewer:  Vanessa M.  Shami  
 
Reviewer’s report:  
 
Please include all comments for the authors in this box rather than uploading your report as an 
attachment. Please only upload as attachments annot ated versions of manuscripts, graphs, 
supporting materials or other aspects of your report which cannot be included in a text format.  
 
Please overwrite this text when adding your comments to the authors.  
 
I think the case report is interesting and would be of benefit to the readership of the journal. The 
authors did address the concerns raised by the reviewers, however there are still a lot of 
grammatical errors throughout the manuscript that need to be addressed prior to publication. I 
would recommend the g rammar be corrected prior to consideration for publication. Below are 
some specific examples:  
 
Abstract, 3rd sentence: Would add "formation" after the word pseudocyst to make it a complete 
sentence. Currently "Pseudocyst is the most frequent outcome of a p ancreatic duct leak" is an 
incomplete sentence.  
 
Abstract, Case presentation section, first sentence: Consider rephrasing: We describe a case of a 
64-year old man with multiple large pancreatic cysts discovered during work up of progressive 
jaundice and si gnificant weight loss ...  
 
Abstra ct, Case presentation section, 7th sentence: "whose drainage" needs to be corrected. A 
pseudocyst is not a who... consider ..."the presence of large communicating pseudocysts that 
were drained by cystogastrostomy."  
 
These are just a few examples of the types of grammatical issues that need to be corrected and 
are present throughout the manuscript.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Unable to assess  
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an addi tional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Needs some language corrections before being published  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the 
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the cont ent of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below . If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is  accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will n ot be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title:  WIRSUNG ATRAUMATIC RUPTURE IN PATIENT WITH PANCREATIC 
PSEUDOCYSTS. A CASE PR ESENTATION  
 
Version: 1 Date: 30 Mar 2018 
 
Reviewer:  Vanessa M.  Shami  
 
Reviewer’s report:  
 
Please include all comments for the authors in this box rather than uploading your report as an 
attachment. Please only upload as attachments annot ated versions of manuscripts, graphs, 
supporting materials or other aspects of your report which cannot be included in a text format.  
 
Please overwrite this text when adding your comments to the authors.  
 
I think the case report is interesting and would be of benefit to the readership of the journal. The 
authors did address the concerns raised by the reviewers, however there are still a lot of 
grammatical errors throughout the manuscript that need to be addressed prior to publication. I 
would recommend the g rammar be corrected prior to consideration for publication. Below are 
some specific examples:  
 
Abstract, 3rd sentence: Would add "formation" after the word pseudocyst to make it a complete 
sentence. Currently "Pseudocyst is the most frequent outcome of a p ancreatic duct leak" is an 
incomplete sentence.  
 
Abstract, Case presentation section, first sentence: Consider rephrasing: We describe a case of a 
64-year old man with multiple large pancreatic cysts discovered during work up of progressive 
jaundice and si gnificant weight loss ...  
 
Abstra ct, Case presentation section, 7th sentence: "whose drainage" needs to be corrected. A 
pseudocyst is not a who... consider ..."the presence of large communicating pseudocysts that 
were drained by cystogastrostomy."  
 
These are just a few examples of the types of grammatical issues that need to be corrected and 
are present throughout the manuscript.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Unable to assess  
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an addi tional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Needs some language corrections before being published  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the 
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the cont ent of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below . If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is  accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will n ot be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title:  WIRSUNG ATRAUMATIC RUPTURE IN PATIENT WITH PANCREATIC 
PSEUDOCYSTS. A CASE PR ESENTATION  
 
Version: 1 Date: 30 Mar 2018 
 
Reviewer:  Vanessa M.  Shami  
 
Reviewer’s report:  
 
Please include all comments for the authors in this box rather than uploading your report as an 
attachment. Please only upload as attachments annot ated versions of manuscripts, graphs, 
supporting materials or other aspects of your report which cannot be included in a text format.  
 
Please overwrite this text when adding your comments to the authors.  
 
I think the case report is interesting and would be of benefit to the readership of the journal. The 
authors did address the concerns raised by the reviewers, however there are still a lot of 
grammatical errors throughout the manuscript that need to be addressed prior to publication. I 
would recommend the g rammar be corrected prior to consideration for publication. Below are 
some specific examples:  
 
Abstract, 3rd sentence: Would add "formation" after the word pseudocyst to make it a complete 
sentence. Currently "Pseudocyst is the most frequent outcome of a p ancreatic duct leak" is an 
incomplete sentence.  
 
Abstract, Case presentation section, first sentence: Consider rephrasing: We describe a case of a 
64-year old man with multiple large pancreatic cysts discovered during work up of progressive 
jaundice and si gnificant weight loss ...  
 
Abstra ct, Case presentation section, 7th sentence: "whose drainage" needs to be corrected. A 
pseudocyst is not a who... consider ..."the presence of large communicating pseudocysts that 
were drained by cystogastrostomy."  
 
These are just a few examples of the types of grammatical issues that need to be corrected and 
are present throughout the manuscript.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Unable to assess  
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an addi tional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Needs some language corrections before being published  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the 
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the cont ent of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below . If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is  accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will n ot be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
assistant