Title: Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes between cap-
fitted forward and side viewing endoscopes in patients with Billroth II anastomosis
Version: 6 Date: 26 Jan 2023
Reviewer's report:
I am OK with the revised manuscript.
For the revised table, I think they are too many parameters and informations. If you prefer to
use matched cohort for analysis, it is enough to show only  red columns. You can mention the
black columns in your result.
Your result is different from the meta-analysis due to center experiences and Endoscopist
preference.
Title: Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes between cap-
fitted forward and side viewing endoscopes in patients with Billroth II anastomosis
Version: 6 Date: 26 Jan 2023
Reviewer's report:
I am OK with the revised manuscript.
For the revised table, I think they are too many parameters and informations. If you prefer to
use matched cohort for analysis, it is enough to show only  red columns. You can mention the
black columns in your result.
Your result is different from the meta-analysis due to center experiences and Endoscopist
preference.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes between cap-
fitted forward and side viewing endoscopes in patients with Billroth II anastomosis
Version: 6 Date: 26 Jan 2023
Reviewer's report:
I am OK with the revised manuscript.
For the revised table, I think they are too many parameters and informations. If you prefer to
use matched cohort for analysis, it is enough to show only  red columns. You can mention the
black columns in your result.
Your result is different from the meta-analysis due to center experiences and Endoscopist
preference.
assistant