Title: Association between avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder risk, dietary attitudes and
behaviors among Chinese patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A cross-sectional study
Version: 3 Date: 11 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
The response letter to the review was confirmed.
Unfortunately, the response letter contained only the revised sections and not the author's
opinion. However, they will not significantly affect the decision.
One point, I could not read the response about selection bias between study participants and
non-participants.
Patients who actively participate in the study and those who do not agree to participate may have
different preferences for food and diet. Therefore, we believe that the point at which selection
bias is already present at the time of participation in this study should also be mentioned as a
Limitation.
Title: Association between avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder risk, dietary attitudes and
behaviors among Chinese patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A cross-sectional study
Version: 3 Date: 11 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
The response letter to the review was confirmed.
Unfortunately, the response letter contained only the revised sections and not the author's
opinion. However, they will not significantly affect the decision.
One point, I could not read the response about selection bias between study participants and
non-participants.
Patients who actively participate in the study and those who do not agree to participate may have
different preferences for food and diet. Therefore, we believe that the point at which selection
bias is already present at the time of participation in this study should also be mentioned as a
Limitation.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Association between avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder risk, dietary attitudes and
behaviors among Chinese patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A cross-sectional study
Version: 3 Date: 11 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
The response letter to the review was confirmed.
Unfortunately, the response letter contained only the revised sections and not the author's
opinion. However, they will not significantly affect the decision.
One point, I could not read the response about selection bias between study participants and
non-participants.
Patients who actively participate in the study and those who do not agree to participate may have
different preferences for food and diet. Therefore, we believe that the point at which selection
bias is already present at the time of participation in this study should also be mentioned as a
Limitation.
assistant