Title: Neutrophil extracellular traps predict postoperative pulmonary complications in paediatric
patients undergoing parental liver transplantation
Version: 4 Date: 15 Mar 2023
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: Authors have evaluated NETs as biomarkers of
pulmonary complications arising out of parental liver transplantation in pediatric patients. In
my earlier review, I found the manuscript suitable for publication however, other reviewer has
raised some queries which i have evaluated in the present version of the manuscript and found
the responses of the authors appropriate. Again, I am satisfied with the current version and find
it suitable for publication.
ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/SUGGESTIONS:
None"
Title: Neutrophil extracellular traps predict postoperative pulmonary complications in paediatric
patients undergoing parental liver transplantation
Version: 4 Date: 15 Mar 2023
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: Authors have evaluated NETs as biomarkers of
pulmonary complications arising out of parental liver transplantation in pediatric patients. In
my earlier review, I found the manuscript suitable for publication however, other reviewer has
raised some queries which i have evaluated in the present version of the manuscript and found
the responses of the authors appropriate. Again, I am satisfied with the current version and find
it suitable for publication.
ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/SUGGESTIONS:
None"
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Neutrophil extracellular traps predict postoperative pulmonary complications in paediatric
patients undergoing parental liver transplantation
Version: 4 Date: 15 Mar 2023
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: Authors have evaluated NETs as biomarkers of
pulmonary complications arising out of parental liver transplantation in pediatric patients. In
my earlier review, I found the manuscript suitable for publication however, other reviewer has
raised some queries which i have evaluated in the present version of the manuscript and found
the responses of the authors appropriate. Again, I am satisfied with the current version and find
it suitable for publication.
ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/SUGGESTIONS:
None"
assistant