Reviewer's report
Title:Primary Biliary Cirrhosis in a genetically homogeneous population: Disease
associations and familial occurence rates.
Version: 3Date:5 June 2012
Reviewer: Carlo Selmi
Reviewer's report:
All my previous comments have been satisfactorily addressed by the authors and
I believe the study design and manuscript quality are now stronger. In particular,
the better description of the organization leads to a better understanding.
Nevertheless, I would recommend a minor essential revision, i.e. that the
explanation of the potentially low response rate is detailed in the discussion of
the revised manuscript.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Reviewer's report
Title:Primary Biliary Cirrhosis in a genetically homogeneous population: Disease
associations and familial occurence rates.
Version: 3Date:5 June 2012
Reviewer: Carlo Selmi
Reviewer's report:
All my previous comments have been satisfactorily addressed by the authors and
I believe the study design and manuscript quality are now stronger. In particular,
the better description of the organization leads to a better understanding.
Nevertheless, I would recommend a minor essential revision, i.e. that the
explanation of the potentially low response rate is detailed in the discussion of
the revised manuscript.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Primary Biliary Cirrhosis in a genetically homogeneous population: Disease
associations and familial occurence rates.
Version: 3Date:5 June 2012
Reviewer: Carlo Selmi
Reviewer's report:
All my previous comments have been satisfactorily addressed by the authors and
I believe the study design and manuscript quality are now stronger. In particular,
the better description of the organization leads to a better understanding.
Nevertheless, I would recommend a minor essential revision, i.e. that the
explanation of the potentially low response rate is detailed in the discussion of
the revised manuscript.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
assistant