Reviewer's report
Title:Prediction of symptomatic improvement after exposure-based treatment for
irritable bowel syndrome.
Version: 1Date:27 June 2013
Reviewer: Dennis Ougrin
Reviewer's report:
This article is well written with sound methodology and good English (a few
inevitable typos need correcting). Statistical analysis appears appropriate.
Discussion is written well and some of the limitations are discussed. However,
the article does not significantly contribute to the knowledge in the field. There
are few significant findings and it may be that the sample size is the main culprit.
Level of interest: An article of insufficient interest to warrant publication in a
scientific/medical journal
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
None
Reviewer's report
Title:Prediction of symptomatic improvement after exposure-based treatment for
irritable bowel syndrome.
Version: 1Date:27 June 2013
Reviewer: Dennis Ougrin
Reviewer's report:
This article is well written with sound methodology and good English (a few
inevitable typos need correcting). Statistical analysis appears appropriate.
Discussion is written well and some of the limitations are discussed. However,
the article does not significantly contribute to the knowledge in the field. There
are few significant findings and it may be that the sample size is the main culprit.
Level of interest: An article of insufficient interest to warrant publication in a
scientific/medical journal
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
None
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Prediction of symptomatic improvement after exposure-based treatment for
irritable bowel syndrome.
Version: 1Date:27 June 2013
Reviewer: Dennis Ougrin
Reviewer's report:
This article is well written with sound methodology and good English (a few
inevitable typos need correcting). Statistical analysis appears appropriate.
Discussion is written well and some of the limitations are discussed. However,
the article does not significantly contribute to the knowledge in the field. There
are few significant findings and it may be that the sample size is the main culprit.
Level of interest: An article of insufficient interest to warrant publication in a
scientific/medical journal
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
None
assistant