Reviewer's report
Title:A prospective, multi center, randomized clinical study to compare the
efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin-Sulbactam 3 days in
the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infections. (T.E.A.
Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-Sulbactam)
Version: 3Date:24 March 2011
Reviewer: Greger Lindberg
Reviewer's report:
The authors have altered their manuscript according to suggestions and I have
no further questions or comments.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Reviewer's report
Title:A prospective, multi center, randomized clinical study to compare the
efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin-Sulbactam 3 days in
the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infections. (T.E.A.
Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-Sulbactam)
Version: 3Date:24 March 2011
Reviewer: Greger Lindberg
Reviewer's report:
The authors have altered their manuscript according to suggestions and I have
no further questions or comments.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:A prospective, multi center, randomized clinical study to compare the
efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin-Sulbactam 3 days in
the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infections. (T.E.A.
Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-Sulbactam)
Version: 3Date:24 March 2011
Reviewer: Greger Lindberg
Reviewer's report:
The authors have altered their manuscript according to suggestions and I have
no further questions or comments.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
assistant