Reviewer's report
Title:Clinical Utility and Tolerability of JSPH-1 Wireless Esophageal pH
Monitoring System
Version: 4Date:8 December 2012
Reviewer: Georgios Karamanolis
Reviewer's report:
The meaning of the second phrase in the 1st paragraph of data analysis is still
confusing to me.
In the discussion section the phrase
“JSPH-1 new pH monitoring system has higher working efficiency, higher
accuracy and longer working hours when compared to BRAVO pH capsule
system.” Should be followed by a reference or should be omitted.
Minor
There are many grammatical errors such as,
Abstract: 2nd line: . The aim instead of , the aim
Page 9: 4th line from the bottom: The instead of the
Page 10: 7th line: Therefore instead of therefore
Conclusiosn: 4th line: patients instead of Patients
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Reviewer's report
Title:Clinical Utility and Tolerability of JSPH-1 Wireless Esophageal pH
Monitoring System
Version: 4Date:8 December 2012
Reviewer: Georgios Karamanolis
Reviewer's report:
The meaning of the second phrase in the 1st paragraph of data analysis is still
confusing to me.
In the discussion section the phrase
“JSPH-1 new pH monitoring system has higher working efficiency, higher
accuracy and longer working hours when compared to BRAVO pH capsule
system.” Should be followed by a reference or should be omitted.
Minor
There are many grammatical errors such as,
Abstract: 2nd line: . The aim instead of , the aim
Page 9: 4th line from the bottom: The instead of the
Page 10: 7th line: Therefore instead of therefore
Conclusiosn: 4th line: patients instead of Patients
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Clinical Utility and Tolerability of JSPH-1 Wireless Esophageal pH
Monitoring System
Version: 4Date:8 December 2012
Reviewer: Georgios Karamanolis
Reviewer's report:
The meaning of the second phrase in the 1st paragraph of data analysis is still
confusing to me.
In the discussion section the phrase
“JSPH-1 new pH monitoring system has higher working efficiency, higher
accuracy and longer working hours when compared to BRAVO pH capsule
system.” Should be followed by a reference or should be omitted.
Minor
There are many grammatical errors such as,
Abstract: 2nd line: . The aim instead of , the aim
Page 9: 4th line from the bottom: The instead of the
Page 10: 7th line: Therefore instead of therefore
Conclusiosn: 4th line: patients instead of Patients
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
assistant