Reviewer's report
Title:Bile Reflux Index After Theurapeutic Biliary Procedures
Version: 1Date:11 December 2007
Reviewer: Tomita Ryouichi
Reviewer's report:
I think that this manuscript is interesting. However, there are some problems.
1) It is better for you to describe patient`s background factor in detail (for
example, functional gastrointestinal disorders, peptic ulcer, and so on).
2)What time did you carry out these examinations?
3)What kind of methods should you perform to clarify the etiologies of DGR in
future?
4) Remove M/F% in Tables 1 and 2.
What next?: Accept after minor essential revisions
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:Bile Reflux Index After Theurapeutic Biliary Procedures
Version: 1Date:11 December 2007
Reviewer: Tomita Ryouichi
Reviewer's report:
I think that this manuscript is interesting. However, there are some problems.
1) It is better for you to describe patient`s background factor in detail (for
example, functional gastrointestinal disorders, peptic ulcer, and so on).
2)What time did you carry out these examinations?
3)What kind of methods should you perform to clarify the etiologies of DGR in
future?
4) Remove M/F% in Tables 1 and 2.
What next?: Accept after minor essential revisions
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Bile Reflux Index After Theurapeutic Biliary Procedures
Version: 1Date:11 December 2007
Reviewer: Tomita Ryouichi
Reviewer's report:
I think that this manuscript is interesting. However, there are some problems.
1) It is better for you to describe patient`s background factor in detail (for
example, functional gastrointestinal disorders, peptic ulcer, and so on).
2)What time did you carry out these examinations?
3)What kind of methods should you perform to clarify the etiologies of DGR in
future?
4) Remove M/F% in Tables 1 and 2.
What next?: Accept after minor essential revisions
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
assistant