Reviewer's report 
 Anomalous Opening of the Common Bile Duct into the Duodenal Bulb: Endoscopic Treatment Title: 
 2  4 June 2007 Version: Date: 
 Christopher Christophi Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
General 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Major Compulsory Revisions (that the author must respond to before a decision on publication can be reached) 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Minor Essential Revisions (such as missing labels on figures, or the wrong use of a term, which the author can be trusted to correct) 
The concerns regarding the embryology have been addressed. The statistical analysis and methodology 
remain weak. Overall. I would recommend acceptance for publication 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Discretionary Revisions (which the author can choose to ignore) 
 Accept without revision What next?: 
 An article of importance in its field Level of interest: 
 Acceptable Quality of written English: 
 No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician. Statistical review: 
Reviewer's report 
 Anomalous Opening of the Common Bile Duct into the Duodenal Bulb: Endoscopic Treatment Title: 
 2  4 June 2007 Version: Date: 
 Christopher Christophi Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
General 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Major Compulsory Revisions (that the author must respond to before a decision on publication can be reached) 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Minor Essential Revisions (such as missing labels on figures, or the wrong use of a term, which the author can be trusted to correct) 
The concerns regarding the embryology have been addressed. The statistical analysis and methodology 
remain weak. Overall. I would recommend acceptance for publication 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Discretionary Revisions (which the author can choose to ignore) 
 Accept without revision What next?: 
 An article of importance in its field Level of interest: 
 Acceptable Quality of written English: 
 No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician. Statistical review: 
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report 
 Anomalous Opening of the Common Bile Duct into the Duodenal Bulb: Endoscopic Treatment Title: 
 2  4 June 2007 Version: Date: 
 Christopher Christophi Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
General 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Major Compulsory Revisions (that the author must respond to before a decision on publication can be reached) 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Minor Essential Revisions (such as missing labels on figures, or the wrong use of a term, which the author can be trusted to correct) 
The concerns regarding the embryology have been addressed. The statistical analysis and methodology 
remain weak. Overall. I would recommend acceptance for publication 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Discretionary Revisions (which the author can choose to ignore) 
 Accept without revision What next?: 
 An article of importance in its field Level of interest: 
 Acceptable Quality of written English: 
 No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician. Statistical review: 
assistant