Reviewer's report
Title:A second-look endoscopy may not reduce the bleeding after endoscopic
submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm
Version:2Date:16 June 2014
Reviewer: Hendrik Manner
Reviewer's report:
All changes made as suggested, interesting paper
Only one minor comment:
On which postoperative day were the check-up endoscopies carried out? Can
the authors deliver clear data (descriptive statistics, minimum, maximum and
mean of postoperative days as well as standard deviation) please.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
none
Reviewer's report
Title:A second-look endoscopy may not reduce the bleeding after endoscopic
submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm
Version:2Date:16 June 2014
Reviewer: Hendrik Manner
Reviewer's report:
All changes made as suggested, interesting paper
Only one minor comment:
On which postoperative day were the check-up endoscopies carried out? Can
the authors deliver clear data (descriptive statistics, minimum, maximum and
mean of postoperative days as well as standard deviation) please.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
none
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:A second-look endoscopy may not reduce the bleeding after endoscopic
submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm
Version:2Date:16 June 2014
Reviewer: Hendrik Manner
Reviewer's report:
All changes made as suggested, interesting paper
Only one minor comment:
On which postoperative day were the check-up endoscopies carried out? Can
the authors deliver clear data (descriptive statistics, minimum, maximum and
mean of postoperative days as well as standard deviation) please.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
none
assistant