Title: Development and Validation of a New Algorithm Model for Differential Diagnosis
Between Crohn's Disease and Intestinal Tuberculosis: A Combination of Laboratory, Imaging
and Endoscopic Characteristics
Version: 3 Date: 15 Apr 2021
Reviewer:  José María Paredes
Reviewer's report:
After the modifications made by the authors, the manuscript has improved. However, the
association of the variables discussed in the introduction should be better explained: "For
imaging characteristics, target sign, comb sign, adipose creeping sign and involvement of fewer
than 4 segments were reported to be vital parameter [8, 9, 11-13]. For endoscopic parameters,
longitudinal ulcers, transverse ulcers, aphthous ulcers, cobblestone, and stricture were proved to
be useful. " Table 6 is still not well defined; What do the numbers indicate? Number of patients
or percentages.
Title: Development and Validation of a New Algorithm Model for Differential Diagnosis
Between Crohn's Disease and Intestinal Tuberculosis: A Combination of Laboratory, Imaging
and Endoscopic Characteristics
Version: 3 Date: 15 Apr 2021
Reviewer:  José María Paredes
Reviewer's report:
After the modifications made by the authors, the manuscript has improved. However, the
association of the variables discussed in the introduction should be better explained: "For
imaging characteristics, target sign, comb sign, adipose creeping sign and involvement of fewer
than 4 segments were reported to be vital parameter [8, 9, 11-13]. For endoscopic parameters,
longitudinal ulcers, transverse ulcers, aphthous ulcers, cobblestone, and stricture were proved to
be useful. " Table 6 is still not well defined; What do the numbers indicate? Number of patients
or percentages.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Development and Validation of a New Algorithm Model for Differential Diagnosis
Between Crohn's Disease and Intestinal Tuberculosis: A Combination of Laboratory, Imaging
and Endoscopic Characteristics
Version: 3 Date: 15 Apr 2021
Reviewer:  José María Paredes
Reviewer's report:
After the modifications made by the authors, the manuscript has improved. However, the
association of the variables discussed in the introduction should be better explained: "For
imaging characteristics, target sign, comb sign, adipose creeping sign and involvement of fewer
than 4 segments were reported to be vital parameter [8, 9, 11-13]. For endoscopic parameters,
longitudinal ulcers, transverse ulcers, aphthous ulcers, cobblestone, and stricture were proved to
be useful. " Table 6 is still not well defined; What do the numbers indicate? Number of patients
or percentages.
assistant