Title: Causes of endoscopic misdiagnosis of gastrointestinal cyst as solid lesion
Version: 3 Date: 29 Sep 2022
Reviewer's report:
Thanks for the great effort of the authors. However, many points to be discussed:
1. The discussion is expected and no new knowledge added to the literature.
2. The number of operating endoscopists is high (18) in relation to small sample size which
could raise question of examination quality as it is operator dependent examination.
3. Why cysts with benign criteria are resected instead of follow up or FNA if uncertain?
Title: Causes of endoscopic misdiagnosis of gastrointestinal cyst as solid lesion
Version: 3 Date: 29 Sep 2022
Reviewer's report:
Thanks for the great effort of the authors. However, many points to be discussed:
1. The discussion is expected and no new knowledge added to the literature.
2. The number of operating endoscopists is high (18) in relation to small sample size which
could raise question of examination quality as it is operator dependent examination.
3. Why cysts with benign criteria are resected instead of follow up or FNA if uncertain?
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Causes of endoscopic misdiagnosis of gastrointestinal cyst as solid lesion
Version: 3 Date: 29 Sep 2022
Reviewer's report:
Thanks for the great effort of the authors. However, many points to be discussed:
1. The discussion is expected and no new knowledge added to the literature.
2. The number of operating endoscopists is high (18) in relation to small sample size which
could raise question of examination quality as it is operator dependent examination.
3. Why cysts with benign criteria are resected instead of follow up or FNA if uncertain?
assistant