Title: "Evaluation of Hepatobiliary Disorders Using Magnetic Resonance
Cholangiopancreatography in a Low-Resource Setting in Kano,Nigeria: A Retrospective Study"
Version: 3 Date: 21 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
1-The manuscript describes the hepatobiliary disorders so that the title should be " Evaluation
of Hepatobiliary Disorders Using Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography  in a Low-
Resource Setting in Kano in Nigeria: A Retrospective"
2-SPSS means "Statistical Package for Social Sciences" so that you should correct the name in
your manuscript.
3-It is better to paraphrase the conclusion without numbers either in abstract or at the end.
4-In your introduction, you should extract the gap and explain the purpose and importance of
the study.
5-In Figures, you MUST remove any information related to patient's identity.
6-In table-4, you should add the association in different age groups and compare the results with
other studies to confirm your results.
7-The opening of discussion should be about  hepatobiliary disorders instead of MRCP.
8-Language editing is needed.
Best regards
Title: "Evaluation of Hepatobiliary Disorders Using Magnetic Resonance
Cholangiopancreatography in a Low-Resource Setting in Kano,Nigeria: A Retrospective Study"
Version: 3 Date: 21 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
1-The manuscript describes the hepatobiliary disorders so that the title should be " Evaluation
of Hepatobiliary Disorders Using Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography  in a Low-
Resource Setting in Kano in Nigeria: A Retrospective"
2-SPSS means "Statistical Package for Social Sciences" so that you should correct the name in
your manuscript.
3-It is better to paraphrase the conclusion without numbers either in abstract or at the end.
4-In your introduction, you should extract the gap and explain the purpose and importance of
the study.
5-In Figures, you MUST remove any information related to patient's identity.
6-In table-4, you should add the association in different age groups and compare the results with
other studies to confirm your results.
7-The opening of discussion should be about  hepatobiliary disorders instead of MRCP.
8-Language editing is needed.
Best regards
Please review this paper.
user
Title: "Evaluation of Hepatobiliary Disorders Using Magnetic Resonance
Cholangiopancreatography in a Low-Resource Setting in Kano,Nigeria: A Retrospective Study"
Version: 3 Date: 21 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
1-The manuscript describes the hepatobiliary disorders so that the title should be " Evaluation
of Hepatobiliary Disorders Using Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography  in a Low-
Resource Setting in Kano in Nigeria: A Retrospective"
2-SPSS means "Statistical Package for Social Sciences" so that you should correct the name in
your manuscript.
3-It is better to paraphrase the conclusion without numbers either in abstract or at the end.
4-In your introduction, you should extract the gap and explain the purpose and importance of
the study.
5-In Figures, you MUST remove any information related to patient's identity.
6-In table-4, you should add the association in different age groups and compare the results with
other studies to confirm your results.
7-The opening of discussion should be about  hepatobiliary disorders instead of MRCP.
8-Language editing is needed.
Best regards
assistant