Title: Risk Factors and Clinical Characteristics of Occult Pancreaticobiliary Reflux in Benign
Gallbladder Diseases
Version: 3 Date: 08 Jan 2025
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
No - there are minor issues
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
No - there are minor issues
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Probably - with minor revisions
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: I would like to congratulate authors such honest effort and
beautifully writing the manuscript. The authors addressed the previous reviewers’ comments.
I feel that literature review will be incomplete without adding this article to the manuscript.
""Gupta V, Abhinav A, Vuthaluru S, et al. (June 16, 2024) The Multifaceted Impact of
Gallstones: Understanding Complications and Management Strategies. Cureus 16(6): e62500.
DOI 10.7759/cureus.62500""
REQUESTED REVISIONS:
The article needs to be added in the reference list
ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/SUGGESTIONS:
The article mentioned earlier needs to be cited"
Title: Risk Factors and Clinical Characteristics of Occult Pancreaticobiliary Reflux in Benign
Gallbladder Diseases
Version: 3 Date: 08 Jan 2025
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
No - there are minor issues
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
No - there are minor issues
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Probably - with minor revisions
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: I would like to congratulate authors such honest effort and
beautifully writing the manuscript. The authors addressed the previous reviewers’ comments.
I feel that literature review will be incomplete without adding this article to the manuscript.
""Gupta V, Abhinav A, Vuthaluru S, et al. (June 16, 2024) The Multifaceted Impact of
Gallstones: Understanding Complications and Management Strategies. Cureus 16(6): e62500.
DOI 10.7759/cureus.62500""
REQUESTED REVISIONS:
The article needs to be added in the reference list
ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/SUGGESTIONS:
The article mentioned earlier needs to be cited"
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Risk Factors and Clinical Characteristics of Occult Pancreaticobiliary Reflux in Benign
Gallbladder Diseases
Version: 3 Date: 08 Jan 2025
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
No - there are minor issues
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
No - there are minor issues
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Probably - with minor revisions
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: I would like to congratulate authors such honest effort and
beautifully writing the manuscript. The authors addressed the previous reviewers’ comments.
I feel that literature review will be incomplete without adding this article to the manuscript.
""Gupta V, Abhinav A, Vuthaluru S, et al. (June 16, 2024) The Multifaceted Impact of
Gallstones: Understanding Complications and Management Strategies. Cureus 16(6): e62500.
DOI 10.7759/cureus.62500""
REQUESTED REVISIONS:
The article needs to be added in the reference list
ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/SUGGESTIONS:
The article mentioned earlier needs to be cited"
assistant