Title: Endoscopic ultrasonography guided cutting scar of esophageal stricture after endoscopic
injection sclerotherapy
Version: 0 Date: 14 Jun 2022
Reviewer's report:
- The proposed title reflects more the presentation of a treatment method than a clinical study
that aims to present the effectiveness of the method
Abstract: “Result: The dysphagia was obviously relieved in 9 patients during follow-up,  and 1
patient suffered dysphagia again after the treatment. There was no complications of perforation,
bleeding and infection among the paitents”. – the assessment of pre- and post-procedure
dysphagia should be objectified either clinically or endoscopically.
Methods
- The design of the study is missing - the model proposed to achieve the goal.
-  Mention how to appreciate the results.
-, Efficacy: The dysphagia was obviously relieved in 9 patients during follow-up among three
months to six months. 1 patient suffered dysphagia again within one month after the treatment,
and endoscope  found that the degree of stricture was grade III.” – to support this statement you
must present statistical results.
Discussions
- It is necessary to present the results of this study in comparison with the data in the literature
- Language corrections are required.
Title: Endoscopic ultrasonography guided cutting scar of esophageal stricture after endoscopic
injection sclerotherapy
Version: 0 Date: 14 Jun 2022
Reviewer's report:
- The proposed title reflects more the presentation of a treatment method than a clinical study
that aims to present the effectiveness of the method
Abstract: “Result: The dysphagia was obviously relieved in 9 patients during follow-up,  and 1
patient suffered dysphagia again after the treatment. There was no complications of perforation,
bleeding and infection among the paitents”. – the assessment of pre- and post-procedure
dysphagia should be objectified either clinically or endoscopically.
Methods
- The design of the study is missing - the model proposed to achieve the goal.
-  Mention how to appreciate the results.
-, Efficacy: The dysphagia was obviously relieved in 9 patients during follow-up among three
months to six months. 1 patient suffered dysphagia again within one month after the treatment,
and endoscope  found that the degree of stricture was grade III.” – to support this statement you
must present statistical results.
Discussions
- It is necessary to present the results of this study in comparison with the data in the literature
- Language corrections are required.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Endoscopic ultrasonography guided cutting scar of esophageal stricture after endoscopic
injection sclerotherapy
Version: 0 Date: 14 Jun 2022
Reviewer's report:
- The proposed title reflects more the presentation of a treatment method than a clinical study
that aims to present the effectiveness of the method
Abstract: “Result: The dysphagia was obviously relieved in 9 patients during follow-up,  and 1
patient suffered dysphagia again after the treatment. There was no complications of perforation,
bleeding and infection among the paitents”. – the assessment of pre- and post-procedure
dysphagia should be objectified either clinically or endoscopically.
Methods
- The design of the study is missing - the model proposed to achieve the goal.
-  Mention how to appreciate the results.
-, Efficacy: The dysphagia was obviously relieved in 9 patients during follow-up among three
months to six months. 1 patient suffered dysphagia again within one month after the treatment,
and endoscope  found that the degree of stricture was grade III.” – to support this statement you
must present statistical results.
Discussions
- It is necessary to present the results of this study in comparison with the data in the literature
- Language corrections are required.
assistant