Title: A novel nomogram for identifying candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with
stage IB gastric adenocarcinoma
Version: 3 Date: 23 Dec 2022
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: The overall impression of the manuscript is that it sounds very good.
The information provided are complete. The analysis is detailed conducted and the results are
pretty significant. The authors responded to the reviewers’ comments with precision adding
many details that enrich the manuscript. I agree with the observations of the reviewers and the
authors have done a good job. I believe that the efforts for the results obtained are visible and
that the results themselves are of great importance to better understand the correct way for the
management of gastric adenoca."
Title: A novel nomogram for identifying candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with
stage IB gastric adenocarcinoma
Version: 3 Date: 23 Dec 2022
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: The overall impression of the manuscript is that it sounds very good.
The information provided are complete. The analysis is detailed conducted and the results are
pretty significant. The authors responded to the reviewers’ comments with precision adding
many details that enrich the manuscript. I agree with the observations of the reviewers and the
authors have done a good job. I believe that the efforts for the results obtained are visible and
that the results themselves are of great importance to better understand the correct way for the
management of gastric adenoca."
Please review this paper.
user
Title: A novel nomogram for identifying candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with
stage IB gastric adenocarcinoma
Version: 3 Date: 23 Dec 2022
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: The overall impression of the manuscript is that it sounds very good.
The information provided are complete. The analysis is detailed conducted and the results are
pretty significant. The authors responded to the reviewers’ comments with precision adding
many details that enrich the manuscript. I agree with the observations of the reviewers and the
authors have done a good job. I believe that the efforts for the results obtained are visible and
that the results themselves are of great importance to better understand the correct way for the
management of gastric adenoca."
assistant