Reviewer’s report  
Title: The endoscopic ultrasound probe findings in prediction of esophageal variceal recurrence 
after endoscopic variceal eradication therapies in cirrhotic patients: A cohort prospective stud y 
Version: 0 Date: 09 Dec 2018  
Reviewer: Giovanni Tarantino  
Reviewer's report:  
Although indirectly referenced, the C -P classification should be properly quoted referring to a 
modern one published in recent years, such as  ...What are the implications of the spontaneous 
spleno -renal shunts in liver cirrhosis? BMC Gastroent erol. 2009 Nov 24;9:89......and Blood 
ammonia levels in liver cirrhosis: a clue for the presence of portosystemic collateral vein. BMC 
Gastroenterol. 2 009 Mar 17;9:21.......looking also at the collaterals.  
 
Each group of patients should be presented with an opportune score of C -P classification.  
 
Authors are requested to justifty the reason for not adminestering beta -blockers during the 
follow -up period  in this at high risk patients.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in y our comments to the authors.  
No 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
No 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in  your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment i n your comments to the editors.  
I am able to assess the statistics  
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
Acceptable  
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, con sidering the following questions:  
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of  the 
manuscript?  
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
6. Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
I do not have conflict of interests  
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the websit e along with the authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named  report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Reviewer’s report  
Title: The endoscopic ultrasound probe findings in prediction of esophageal variceal recurrence 
after endoscopic variceal eradication therapies in cirrhotic patients: A cohort prospective stud y 
Version: 0 Date: 09 Dec 2018  
Reviewer: Giovanni Tarantino  
Reviewer's report:  
Although indirectly referenced, the C -P classification should be properly quoted referring to a 
modern one published in recent years, such as  ...What are the implications of the spontaneous 
spleno -renal shunts in liver cirrhosis? BMC Gastroent erol. 2009 Nov 24;9:89......and Blood 
ammonia levels in liver cirrhosis: a clue for the presence of portosystemic collateral vein. BMC 
Gastroenterol. 2 009 Mar 17;9:21.......looking also at the collaterals.  
 
Each group of patients should be presented with an opportune score of C -P classification.  
 
Authors are requested to justifty the reason for not adminestering beta -blockers during the 
follow -up period  in this at high risk patients.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in y our comments to the authors.  
No 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
No 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in  your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment i n your comments to the editors.  
I am able to assess the statistics  
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
Acceptable  
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, con sidering the following questions:  
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of  the 
manuscript?  
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
6. Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
I do not have conflict of interests  
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the websit e along with the authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named  report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer’s report  
Title: The endoscopic ultrasound probe findings in prediction of esophageal variceal recurrence 
after endoscopic variceal eradication therapies in cirrhotic patients: A cohort prospective stud y 
Version: 0 Date: 09 Dec 2018  
Reviewer: Giovanni Tarantino  
Reviewer's report:  
Although indirectly referenced, the C -P classification should be properly quoted referring to a 
modern one published in recent years, such as  ...What are the implications of the spontaneous 
spleno -renal shunts in liver cirrhosis? BMC Gastroent erol. 2009 Nov 24;9:89......and Blood 
ammonia levels in liver cirrhosis: a clue for the presence of portosystemic collateral vein. BMC 
Gastroenterol. 2 009 Mar 17;9:21.......looking also at the collaterals.  
 
Each group of patients should be presented with an opportune score of C -P classification.  
 
Authors are requested to justifty the reason for not adminestering beta -blockers during the 
follow -up period  in this at high risk patients.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in y our comments to the authors.  
No 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
No 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in  your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment i n your comments to the editors.  
I am able to assess the statistics  
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
Acceptable  
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, con sidering the following questions:  
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of  the 
manuscript?  
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
6. Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
I do not have conflict of interests  
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the websit e along with the authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named  report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
assistant