Reviewer's report 
 Acute cholecystitis with massive upper gastrointestinal bleed: a case report and review of the Title: 
literature 
 3  29 December 2006 Version: Date: 
 Markus Buchler Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
We recognize major improvement in the revised manuscript and would suggest its publication, provided that 
the following minor changes are made: 
The abstract, the case report section and the figure legends should also be checked and corrected by a 
native speaker. In the abstract CBD should not be abbreviated since the word is only used once. Malena 
should be changed to melaena throughout the whole text. In the first paragraph of the case report section 
we would suggest to indicate the systolic and diastolic blood pressure according to the following example: 
100/60 mmHg. In the third paragraph on the first line the word “given” can be left out. In the discussion 
section in last sentence of the fourth paragraph the word “be” should be added as follows: “It is possible to 
miss bleeding form papilla in patients with haemobilia as it may be intermittent in nature…” And finally, in the third sentence of the seventh paragraph the word “no” should be added as follows: However, serious bleeding can be precipitated, when dissection is performed in an area where there is no evidence of acute 
inflammation. 
 Accept after minor essential revisions What next?: 
Reviewer's report 
 Acute cholecystitis with massive upper gastrointestinal bleed: a case report and review of the Title: 
literature 
 3  29 December 2006 Version: Date: 
 Markus Buchler Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
We recognize major improvement in the revised manuscript and would suggest its publication, provided that 
the following minor changes are made: 
The abstract, the case report section and the figure legends should also be checked and corrected by a 
native speaker. In the abstract CBD should not be abbreviated since the word is only used once. Malena 
should be changed to melaena throughout the whole text. In the first paragraph of the case report section 
we would suggest to indicate the systolic and diastolic blood pressure according to the following example: 
100/60 mmHg. In the third paragraph on the first line the word “given” can be left out. In the discussion 
section in last sentence of the fourth paragraph the word “be” should be added as follows: “It is possible to 
miss bleeding form papilla in patients with haemobilia as it may be intermittent in nature…” And finally, in the third sentence of the seventh paragraph the word “no” should be added as follows: However, serious bleeding can be precipitated, when dissection is performed in an area where there is no evidence of acute 
inflammation. 
 Accept after minor essential revisions What next?: 
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report 
 Acute cholecystitis with massive upper gastrointestinal bleed: a case report and review of the Title: 
literature 
 3  29 December 2006 Version: Date: 
 Markus Buchler Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
We recognize major improvement in the revised manuscript and would suggest its publication, provided that 
the following minor changes are made: 
The abstract, the case report section and the figure legends should also be checked and corrected by a 
native speaker. In the abstract CBD should not be abbreviated since the word is only used once. Malena 
should be changed to melaena throughout the whole text. In the first paragraph of the case report section 
we would suggest to indicate the systolic and diastolic blood pressure according to the following example: 
100/60 mmHg. In the third paragraph on the first line the word “given” can be left out. In the discussion 
section in last sentence of the fourth paragraph the word “be” should be added as follows: “It is possible to 
miss bleeding form papilla in patients with haemobilia as it may be intermittent in nature…” And finally, in the third sentence of the seventh paragraph the word “no” should be added as follows: However, serious bleeding can be precipitated, when dissection is performed in an area where there is no evidence of acute 
inflammation. 
 Accept after minor essential revisions What next?: 
assistant