Title: Performance and comparison of artificial intelligence and human experts in the detection
and classification of colonic polyps
Version: 2 Date: 01 Jul 2022
Reviewer's report:
In this second revised version of the manuscript the authors addressed the reviewer questions
satisfactorily.
The major methodological limitation of the study, the fact that only 1 out of 16 analyzed
studies is validated externally, is now addressed properly. This limitation significantly lowers
the relevance of the manuscript. Nevertheless, the analysis is now reported in a way that is
accessible for the audience and the study may be of interest to some readers. Also, the weakened
claims now reflect the weaknesses of the individual studies that are part of this meta-analysis.
Title: Performance and comparison of artificial intelligence and human experts in the detection
and classification of colonic polyps
Version: 2 Date: 01 Jul 2022
Reviewer's report:
In this second revised version of the manuscript the authors addressed the reviewer questions
satisfactorily.
The major methodological limitation of the study, the fact that only 1 out of 16 analyzed
studies is validated externally, is now addressed properly. This limitation significantly lowers
the relevance of the manuscript. Nevertheless, the analysis is now reported in a way that is
accessible for the audience and the study may be of interest to some readers. Also, the weakened
claims now reflect the weaknesses of the individual studies that are part of this meta-analysis.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Performance and comparison of artificial intelligence and human experts in the detection
and classification of colonic polyps
Version: 2 Date: 01 Jul 2022
Reviewer's report:
In this second revised version of the manuscript the authors addressed the reviewer questions
satisfactorily.
The major methodological limitation of the study, the fact that only 1 out of 16 analyzed
studies is validated externally, is now addressed properly. This limitation significantly lowers
the relevance of the manuscript. Nevertheless, the analysis is now reported in a way that is
accessible for the audience and the study may be of interest to some readers. Also, the weakened
claims now reflect the weaknesses of the individual studies that are part of this meta-analysis.
assistant