Title: Predictive value of fibrinogen in identifying inflammatory bowel disease in active stage
Version: 0 Date: 08 Oct 2021
Reviewer's report:
1. I totally disagree with the description of FC (line 191). It is currently the best non-invasive
biomarker in IBD diagnostics and deserves more detailed characteristics, including obvious
advantages.
2. I would recommend more extended characteristics of the studied group like: disease extend,
CD endoscopic activity,  standard inflammatory markers. Serum fibrinogen should be compared
with CRP or FC.
3.  Discussion should more detailed and focused on the achieved results.
Title: Predictive value of fibrinogen in identifying inflammatory bowel disease in active stage
Version: 0 Date: 08 Oct 2021
Reviewer's report:
1. I totally disagree with the description of FC (line 191). It is currently the best non-invasive
biomarker in IBD diagnostics and deserves more detailed characteristics, including obvious
advantages.
2. I would recommend more extended characteristics of the studied group like: disease extend,
CD endoscopic activity,  standard inflammatory markers. Serum fibrinogen should be compared
with CRP or FC.
3.  Discussion should more detailed and focused on the achieved results.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Predictive value of fibrinogen in identifying inflammatory bowel disease in active stage
Version: 0 Date: 08 Oct 2021
Reviewer's report:
1. I totally disagree with the description of FC (line 191). It is currently the best non-invasive
biomarker in IBD diagnostics and deserves more detailed characteristics, including obvious
advantages.
2. I would recommend more extended characteristics of the studied group like: disease extend,
CD endoscopic activity,  standard inflammatory markers. Serum fibrinogen should be compared
with CRP or FC.
3.  Discussion should more detailed and focused on the achieved results.
assistant