Reviewer's report
Title:Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy - a meta-analysis of
randomized controlled trials
Version: 2Date:22 October 2010
Reviewer: Anette Sundfor Jacobsen
Reviewer's report:
I think this paper is now appropriate and acceptable.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
Declaration of competing interests:
No competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy - a meta-analysis of
randomized controlled trials
Version: 2Date:22 October 2010
Reviewer: Anette Sundfor Jacobsen
Reviewer's report:
I think this paper is now appropriate and acceptable.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
Declaration of competing interests:
No competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy - a meta-analysis of
randomized controlled trials
Version: 2Date:22 October 2010
Reviewer: Anette Sundfor Jacobsen
Reviewer's report:
I think this paper is now appropriate and acceptable.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
Declaration of competing interests:
No competing interests.
assistant