Reviewer's report
Title:Dilemma of endoscopic features of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.
Version: 2Date:9 March 2012
Reviewer: Ala I Sharara
Reviewer's report:
This is a relatively large single-center retrospective study reporting on the clinical
and endoscopic findings of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SUS). The paper is
relatively well-written and the data presented in good sequence. The title should
perhaps be changed to “The clinical and endoscopic spectrum of the solitary
rectal ulcer syndrome: A single-center experience of 116 cases” given that the
paper details both spectrums. Unfortunately, some of the figures are of poor
quality.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Reviewer's report
Title:Dilemma of endoscopic features of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.
Version: 2Date:9 March 2012
Reviewer: Ala I Sharara
Reviewer's report:
This is a relatively large single-center retrospective study reporting on the clinical
and endoscopic findings of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SUS). The paper is
relatively well-written and the data presented in good sequence. The title should
perhaps be changed to “The clinical and endoscopic spectrum of the solitary
rectal ulcer syndrome: A single-center experience of 116 cases” given that the
paper details both spectrums. Unfortunately, some of the figures are of poor
quality.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Dilemma of endoscopic features of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.
Version: 2Date:9 March 2012
Reviewer: Ala I Sharara
Reviewer's report:
This is a relatively large single-center retrospective study reporting on the clinical
and endoscopic findings of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SUS). The paper is
relatively well-written and the data presented in good sequence. The title should
perhaps be changed to “The clinical and endoscopic spectrum of the solitary
rectal ulcer syndrome: A single-center experience of 116 cases” given that the
paper details both spectrums. Unfortunately, some of the figures are of poor
quality.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
assistant