Title: Comparison the effects and side effects of Covid-19 vaccination in patients with
inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); A systematic scoping review
Version: 0 Date: 21 Jul 2022
Reviewer's report:
I find the subject and study interesting but the study needs revisions:
1. We don’t have “COVID-19 disease”, the disease is itself “COVID-19” and the virus is “SARS-
CoV-2”. Correct in the whole manuscript please.
2. Some sentences are rather long or hard to follow. Check the manuscript language, e.g. the
first sentence of abstract.
3. Regarding the sentence: “Covid-19 disease is a pandemic disease that maybe more severe and
mortal in people with immunodeficiency, such as those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD),
who are taking immunosuppressive drugs.” I prefer not use the wording “may be”, because
this is rather a certain fact that many immunosuppressive groups of patients have higher risk of
severe COVID-19, yet this is not an important issue just for mentioning.
4. This part is not that important for the abstract: “Total of 212 articles were obtained within the
first step of searching, and 147 ones remained after removing the duplications. Through the title
and abstract screening, 127 were removed.” Only the number of final included studies suffice.
Focus more on the findings.
5. You may want to focus more on the inclusion/exclusion criteria in the methods, e.g. the types
of studies that were excluded (like reviews).
6. It is better to mention the side effects and some more important data in the results section,
rather than only referring to the Table 3.
Title: Comparison the effects and side effects of Covid-19 vaccination in patients with
inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); A systematic scoping review
Version: 0 Date: 21 Jul 2022
Reviewer's report:
I find the subject and study interesting but the study needs revisions:
1. We don’t have “COVID-19 disease”, the disease is itself “COVID-19” and the virus is “SARS-
CoV-2”. Correct in the whole manuscript please.
2. Some sentences are rather long or hard to follow. Check the manuscript language, e.g. the
first sentence of abstract.
3. Regarding the sentence: “Covid-19 disease is a pandemic disease that maybe more severe and
mortal in people with immunodeficiency, such as those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD),
who are taking immunosuppressive drugs.” I prefer not use the wording “may be”, because
this is rather a certain fact that many immunosuppressive groups of patients have higher risk of
severe COVID-19, yet this is not an important issue just for mentioning.
4. This part is not that important for the abstract: “Total of 212 articles were obtained within the
first step of searching, and 147 ones remained after removing the duplications. Through the title
and abstract screening, 127 were removed.” Only the number of final included studies suffice.
Focus more on the findings.
5. You may want to focus more on the inclusion/exclusion criteria in the methods, e.g. the types
of studies that were excluded (like reviews).
6. It is better to mention the side effects and some more important data in the results section,
rather than only referring to the Table 3.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Comparison the effects and side effects of Covid-19 vaccination in patients with
inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); A systematic scoping review
Version: 0 Date: 21 Jul 2022
Reviewer's report:
I find the subject and study interesting but the study needs revisions:
1. We don’t have “COVID-19 disease”, the disease is itself “COVID-19” and the virus is “SARS-
CoV-2”. Correct in the whole manuscript please.
2. Some sentences are rather long or hard to follow. Check the manuscript language, e.g. the
first sentence of abstract.
3. Regarding the sentence: “Covid-19 disease is a pandemic disease that maybe more severe and
mortal in people with immunodeficiency, such as those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD),
who are taking immunosuppressive drugs.” I prefer not use the wording “may be”, because
this is rather a certain fact that many immunosuppressive groups of patients have higher risk of
severe COVID-19, yet this is not an important issue just for mentioning.
4. This part is not that important for the abstract: “Total of 212 articles were obtained within the
first step of searching, and 147 ones remained after removing the duplications. Through the title
and abstract screening, 127 were removed.” Only the number of final included studies suffice.
Focus more on the findings.
5. You may want to focus more on the inclusion/exclusion criteria in the methods, e.g. the types
of studies that were excluded (like reviews).
6. It is better to mention the side effects and some more important data in the results section,
rather than only referring to the Table 3.
assistant