Reviewer's report
Title:Drain tube migration into the anastomotic site of an esophagojejunostomy
for gastric small cell carcinoma: short report
Version: 1Date:8 February 2010
Reviewer: Razvan Scurtu
Reviewer's report:
The case report entitled „ Drain tube migration into the anastomotic site of an
esophagojejunostomy for gastric small cell carcinoma: short report” by
Peng-Sheng Lai et al provides interesting informations on an very unusual
situation. The report may be accepted for publication.
Discretionary revisions
For instance it will be useful to understand why the drain was kept in place for
about a month ? It will also be very useful to understand why the authors had to
retrieve the drain under endoscopic guidance?
Minor essential revisions
The authors should review the figures number since in the legends apear to be
1A and 1B while in the text the figures are marked as 1 and 2 respectively.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Reviewer's report
Title:Drain tube migration into the anastomotic site of an esophagojejunostomy
for gastric small cell carcinoma: short report
Version: 1Date:8 February 2010
Reviewer: Razvan Scurtu
Reviewer's report:
The case report entitled „ Drain tube migration into the anastomotic site of an
esophagojejunostomy for gastric small cell carcinoma: short report” by
Peng-Sheng Lai et al provides interesting informations on an very unusual
situation. The report may be accepted for publication.
Discretionary revisions
For instance it will be useful to understand why the drain was kept in place for
about a month ? It will also be very useful to understand why the authors had to
retrieve the drain under endoscopic guidance?
Minor essential revisions
The authors should review the figures number since in the legends apear to be
1A and 1B while in the text the figures are marked as 1 and 2 respectively.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Drain tube migration into the anastomotic site of an esophagojejunostomy
for gastric small cell carcinoma: short report
Version: 1Date:8 February 2010
Reviewer: Razvan Scurtu
Reviewer's report:
The case report entitled „ Drain tube migration into the anastomotic site of an
esophagojejunostomy for gastric small cell carcinoma: short report” by
Peng-Sheng Lai et al provides interesting informations on an very unusual
situation. The report may be accepted for publication.
Discretionary revisions
For instance it will be useful to understand why the drain was kept in place for
about a month ? It will also be very useful to understand why the authors had to
retrieve the drain under endoscopic guidance?
Minor essential revisions
The authors should review the figures number since in the legends apear to be
1A and 1B while in the text the figures are marked as 1 and 2 respectively.
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
assistant