Reviewer's report
Title:"Drop in" gastroscopy outpatient clinic - experience after 9 months
Version: 1Date:29 October 2011
Reviewer: Anthony Catto-Smith
Reviewer's report:
this paper describes a clinical audit of an interesting approach to the provision of
endoscopic services. The methodology and analyses are sound with no specific
criticisms to offer. The only area of concern that I had was with table 2 which was
a bit difficult to understand. it wasn't clear what the data referred to in terms of
the numbers in brackets and the denominator numbers. This needs to clarified in
the table legend
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
Reviewer's report
Title:"Drop in" gastroscopy outpatient clinic - experience after 9 months
Version: 1Date:29 October 2011
Reviewer: Anthony Catto-Smith
Reviewer's report:
this paper describes a clinical audit of an interesting approach to the provision of
endoscopic services. The methodology and analyses are sound with no specific
criticisms to offer. The only area of concern that I had was with table 2 which was
a bit difficult to understand. it wasn't clear what the data referred to in terms of
the numbers in brackets and the denominator numbers. This needs to clarified in
the table legend
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:"Drop in" gastroscopy outpatient clinic - experience after 9 months
Version: 1Date:29 October 2011
Reviewer: Anthony Catto-Smith
Reviewer's report:
this paper describes a clinical audit of an interesting approach to the provision of
endoscopic services. The methodology and analyses are sound with no specific
criticisms to offer. The only area of concern that I had was with table 2 which was
a bit difficult to understand. it wasn't clear what the data referred to in terms of
the numbers in brackets and the denominator numbers. This needs to clarified in
the table legend
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
assistant