Reviewer's report
Title:A novel scoring system for prognostic prediction in
d-galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide-induced fulminant hepatic failure BALB/c
mice
Version: 2Date:25 October 2009
Reviewer: Shosuke Kojo
Reviewer's report:
Authors made additional experiments to respond to my questions and
appropriately revised their manuscript.
My major question was "Authors should compare their score using small
molecules with conventional parameters such as ALT, AST, LDH etc. Is their
score superior to conventional parameters?"
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:A novel scoring system for prognostic prediction in
d-galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide-induced fulminant hepatic failure BALB/c
mice
Version: 2Date:25 October 2009
Reviewer: Shosuke Kojo
Reviewer's report:
Authors made additional experiments to respond to my questions and
appropriately revised their manuscript.
My major question was "Authors should compare their score using small
molecules with conventional parameters such as ALT, AST, LDH etc. Is their
score superior to conventional parameters?"
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:A novel scoring system for prognostic prediction in
d-galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide-induced fulminant hepatic failure BALB/c
mice
Version: 2Date:25 October 2009
Reviewer: Shosuke Kojo
Reviewer's report:
Authors made additional experiments to respond to my questions and
appropriately revised their manuscript.
My major question was "Authors should compare their score using small
molecules with conventional parameters such as ALT, AST, LDH etc. Is their
score superior to conventional parameters?"
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
assistant