Reviewer's report
Title:Case report: Acute Pancreatitis Caused By Postcholecystectomic
Hemobilia.
Version: 3Date:2 January 2010
Reviewer: Young Koog Cheon
Reviewer's report:
Major Compulsory Revisions
Major points
1. The grammar in the manuscript has to be edited extensively for publication.
2. A more detailed description of selective angiography is needed. Was contrast
observed passing from the cystic duct to the CBD? During embolization, which
branch was the endocoil placed? Angiographic findings following embolization,
are also needed.
3. The discussion is long and general description of hemobilia is not needed,
especially the first part.
4. The authors should explain the possible mechanism of hemobilia occurred in
the first place, and if there is a way to prevent it from occurring, during surgery.
5. There were no figure legends. Add figure legends.
Minor points
1. Correct spelling a lot of words.
In abstract,,
Line 3,, but Acute… ->#but acute
Line 4, ..is yet not described. -># is not yet described.
Line 5, We present..--> We presented
Line 5, a 32 years old female, -># a 32-year-old female
Line 10, psoudoanevrism -># pseudoaneurysm
2. In Case report,
Amilase --># amylase
Amilase, Lipase are# need a unit and change to amylase, lipase
eozophagus --> # esophagus
Contrast enhanced abdominal tomography --># abdominal computerized
tomography
cathater -->#catheter
‘ductus choledochus’ means the sphincter of bile duct, and so you have to
change to “common bile duct”.
In last line of ‘Case report’. remaining # remant
3. In conclusion,
In first line of last paragraph,
…and Acute pancreatitis…. --># and acute pancreatitis…
4. If possible endoscopy figures of bleeding directly from the papillary orifice
should be added and replace the figure 1.
5. In figure 2, there are too many CT films. The 3rd and 4th CT findings are
enough in this manuscript.
6. Figures of selective angiography should be reduced. Figure 4 is not needed.
7. Remove the figure 7.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Not suitable for publication unless extensively edited
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
Reviewer's report
Title:Case report: Acute Pancreatitis Caused By Postcholecystectomic
Hemobilia.
Version: 3Date:2 January 2010
Reviewer: Young Koog Cheon
Reviewer's report:
Major Compulsory Revisions
Major points
1. The grammar in the manuscript has to be edited extensively for publication.
2. A more detailed description of selective angiography is needed. Was contrast
observed passing from the cystic duct to the CBD? During embolization, which
branch was the endocoil placed? Angiographic findings following embolization,
are also needed.
3. The discussion is long and general description of hemobilia is not needed,
especially the first part.
4. The authors should explain the possible mechanism of hemobilia occurred in
the first place, and if there is a way to prevent it from occurring, during surgery.
5. There were no figure legends. Add figure legends.
Minor points
1. Correct spelling a lot of words.
In abstract,,
Line 3,, but Acute… ->#but acute
Line 4, ..is yet not described. -># is not yet described.
Line 5, We present..--> We presented
Line 5, a 32 years old female, -># a 32-year-old female
Line 10, psoudoanevrism -># pseudoaneurysm
2. In Case report,
Amilase --># amylase
Amilase, Lipase are# need a unit and change to amylase, lipase
eozophagus --> # esophagus
Contrast enhanced abdominal tomography --># abdominal computerized
tomography
cathater -->#catheter
‘ductus choledochus’ means the sphincter of bile duct, and so you have to
change to “common bile duct”.
In last line of ‘Case report’. remaining # remant
3. In conclusion,
In first line of last paragraph,
…and Acute pancreatitis…. --># and acute pancreatitis…
4. If possible endoscopy figures of bleeding directly from the papillary orifice
should be added and replace the figure 1.
5. In figure 2, there are too many CT films. The 3rd and 4th CT findings are
enough in this manuscript.
6. Figures of selective angiography should be reduced. Figure 4 is not needed.
7. Remove the figure 7.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Not suitable for publication unless extensively edited
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Case report: Acute Pancreatitis Caused By Postcholecystectomic
Hemobilia.
Version: 3Date:2 January 2010
Reviewer: Young Koog Cheon
Reviewer's report:
Major Compulsory Revisions
Major points
1. The grammar in the manuscript has to be edited extensively for publication.
2. A more detailed description of selective angiography is needed. Was contrast
observed passing from the cystic duct to the CBD? During embolization, which
branch was the endocoil placed? Angiographic findings following embolization,
are also needed.
3. The discussion is long and general description of hemobilia is not needed,
especially the first part.
4. The authors should explain the possible mechanism of hemobilia occurred in
the first place, and if there is a way to prevent it from occurring, during surgery.
5. There were no figure legends. Add figure legends.
Minor points
1. Correct spelling a lot of words.
In abstract,,
Line 3,, but Acute… ->#but acute
Line 4, ..is yet not described. -># is not yet described.
Line 5, We present..--> We presented
Line 5, a 32 years old female, -># a 32-year-old female
Line 10, psoudoanevrism -># pseudoaneurysm
2. In Case report,
Amilase --># amylase
Amilase, Lipase are# need a unit and change to amylase, lipase
eozophagus --> # esophagus
Contrast enhanced abdominal tomography --># abdominal computerized
tomography
cathater -->#catheter
‘ductus choledochus’ means the sphincter of bile duct, and so you have to
change to “common bile duct”.
In last line of ‘Case report’. remaining # remant
3. In conclusion,
In first line of last paragraph,
…and Acute pancreatitis…. --># and acute pancreatitis…
4. If possible endoscopy figures of bleeding directly from the papillary orifice
should be added and replace the figure 1.
5. In figure 2, there are too many CT films. The 3rd and 4th CT findings are
enough in this manuscript.
6. Figures of selective angiography should be reduced. Figure 4 is not needed.
7. Remove the figure 7.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Not suitable for publication unless extensively edited
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
assistant