Title: Clinical application and effectiveness analysis of modified Asia-Pacific colorectal cancer
screening score combined with fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening in
asymptomatic population
Version: 0 Date: 16 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. The study presents valuable findings
on the effectiveness of the modified Asia-Pacific Colorectal Cancer Screening (APCS) score
combined with the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The
research is relevant and well-structured, but several areas require clarification and refinement
before publication.
I appreciate the authors’ efforts and look forward to the revised version.
Title: Clinical application and effectiveness analysis of modified Asia-Pacific colorectal cancer
screening score combined with fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening in
asymptomatic population
Version: 0 Date: 16 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. The study presents valuable findings
on the effectiveness of the modified Asia-Pacific Colorectal Cancer Screening (APCS) score
combined with the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The
research is relevant and well-structured, but several areas require clarification and refinement
before publication.
I appreciate the authors’ efforts and look forward to the revised version.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Clinical application and effectiveness analysis of modified Asia-Pacific colorectal cancer
screening score combined with fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening in
asymptomatic population
Version: 0 Date: 16 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. The study presents valuable findings
on the effectiveness of the modified Asia-Pacific Colorectal Cancer Screening (APCS) score
combined with the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The
research is relevant and well-structured, but several areas require clarification and refinement
before publication.
I appreciate the authors’ efforts and look forward to the revised version.
assistant