Title: Diagnosis and treatment of traumatic duodenal rupture in children
Version: 0 Date: 05 Dec 2021
Reviewer:  Sergey V. Minaev
Reviewer's report:
The article is fascinating for specialists involved in helping children with duodenum trauma. The
manuscript is written in good language. However, the work should carry out a minor revision.
You need to pay attention to the following points:
35 line - indicate the error of the arithmetic mean (48.25 days ±???);
48 line - The noun phrase small intestine seems to be missing a determiner before it. Consider
adding an article;
67 line - The numeral 1 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the number;
68 line – removed “for example”: Replace with this version “(punched, kicked)”;
69 line – The numeral 3 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the number;
70 line – The numeral 2 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the number;
86 line – The phrase “surgical exploration by us” may be wordy. Replace with this version ”our
surgical exploration”;
100 line – The phrase “Their prognosis was good” may be wordy. Replace with this version
“Their results was good” ;
137 line – It appears that the form of the participle “interrupted” is not correct in this context.
Replace with this version “interrupting”;
142 line – The abbreviation “et al” seems to be incorrectly punctuated. Consider changing the
punctuation;
165 line – The phrase “Secondary operation” may be wordy. Replace with this version “A
secondary operation”;
191 line – The plural verb “include” does not appear to agree with the singular subject “The
treatment principle”. Consider changing the verb form for subject-verb agreement;
204 line – The numeral 4 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the
number;
243 line – The numeral 1 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the
number;
270 line – The numeral 2 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the
number;
354 line – Describe Figure 2. Wound healing. What can readers and should see in each of the
four photos?;
The Table 2 and Table 3 indicate the source in square brackets on the table
Title: Diagnosis and treatment of traumatic duodenal rupture in children
Version: 0 Date: 05 Dec 2021
Reviewer:  Sergey V. Minaev
Reviewer's report:
The article is fascinating for specialists involved in helping children with duodenum trauma. The
manuscript is written in good language. However, the work should carry out a minor revision.
You need to pay attention to the following points:
35 line - indicate the error of the arithmetic mean (48.25 days ±???);
48 line - The noun phrase small intestine seems to be missing a determiner before it. Consider
adding an article;
67 line - The numeral 1 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the number;
68 line – removed “for example”: Replace with this version “(punched, kicked)”;
69 line – The numeral 3 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the number;
70 line – The numeral 2 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the number;
86 line – The phrase “surgical exploration by us” may be wordy. Replace with this version ”our
surgical exploration”;
100 line – The phrase “Their prognosis was good” may be wordy. Replace with this version
“Their results was good” ;
137 line – It appears that the form of the participle “interrupted” is not correct in this context.
Replace with this version “interrupting”;
142 line – The abbreviation “et al” seems to be incorrectly punctuated. Consider changing the
punctuation;
165 line – The phrase “Secondary operation” may be wordy. Replace with this version “A
secondary operation”;
191 line – The plural verb “include” does not appear to agree with the singular subject “The
treatment principle”. Consider changing the verb form for subject-verb agreement;
204 line – The numeral 4 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the
number;
243 line – The numeral 1 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the
number;
270 line – The numeral 2 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the
number;
354 line – Describe Figure 2. Wound healing. What can readers and should see in each of the
four photos?;
The Table 2 and Table 3 indicate the source in square brackets on the table
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Diagnosis and treatment of traumatic duodenal rupture in children
Version: 0 Date: 05 Dec 2021
Reviewer:  Sergey V. Minaev
Reviewer's report:
The article is fascinating for specialists involved in helping children with duodenum trauma. The
manuscript is written in good language. However, the work should carry out a minor revision.
You need to pay attention to the following points:
35 line - indicate the error of the arithmetic mean (48.25 days ±???);
48 line - The noun phrase small intestine seems to be missing a determiner before it. Consider
adding an article;
67 line - The numeral 1 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the number;
68 line – removed “for example”: Replace with this version “(punched, kicked)”;
69 line – The numeral 3 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the number;
70 line – The numeral 2 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the number;
86 line – The phrase “surgical exploration by us” may be wordy. Replace with this version ”our
surgical exploration”;
100 line – The phrase “Their prognosis was good” may be wordy. Replace with this version
“Their results was good” ;
137 line – It appears that the form of the participle “interrupted” is not correct in this context.
Replace with this version “interrupting”;
142 line – The abbreviation “et al” seems to be incorrectly punctuated. Consider changing the
punctuation;
165 line – The phrase “Secondary operation” may be wordy. Replace with this version “A
secondary operation”;
191 line – The plural verb “include” does not appear to agree with the singular subject “The
treatment principle”. Consider changing the verb form for subject-verb agreement;
204 line – The numeral 4 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the
number;
243 line – The numeral 1 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the
number;
270 line – The numeral 2 is used instead of the word spelled out. Consider spelling out the
number;
354 line – Describe Figure 2. Wound healing. What can readers and should see in each of the
four photos?;
The Table 2 and Table 3 indicate the source in square brackets on the table
assistant