Title: ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS OF RADIOEMBOLIZATION WITH YTTRIUM-90
MICROSPHERES IN LIVER METASTASES OF COLORECTAL CANCER: A
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Version: 0 Date: 05 Feb 2023
Reviewer's report:
Nice research paper, the Authors clearly master the topic and the methodology.
We are nevertheless surprised - and need clarifications on 2 points
1) we missed the PROPSERO registration number. The registration of any systematic review,
with or without metanalysis, should be obtained.
2) neither forrest plots nor any other meta-analysis were provided for this SR. The reader struggle
to catch easily the conclusio of each comparison. Moreover, gicen the presence of clear groups
being compared with measurable effects, forrest plots could be generated. We strongly invite
the authors to provide graphical representation of each comparison, to increase fruibility of the
manuscript.
Title: ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS OF RADIOEMBOLIZATION WITH YTTRIUM-90
MICROSPHERES IN LIVER METASTASES OF COLORECTAL CANCER: A
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Version: 0 Date: 05 Feb 2023
Reviewer's report:
Nice research paper, the Authors clearly master the topic and the methodology.
We are nevertheless surprised - and need clarifications on 2 points
1) we missed the PROPSERO registration number. The registration of any systematic review,
with or without metanalysis, should be obtained.
2) neither forrest plots nor any other meta-analysis were provided for this SR. The reader struggle
to catch easily the conclusio of each comparison. Moreover, gicen the presence of clear groups
being compared with measurable effects, forrest plots could be generated. We strongly invite
the authors to provide graphical representation of each comparison, to increase fruibility of the
manuscript.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS OF RADIOEMBOLIZATION WITH YTTRIUM-90
MICROSPHERES IN LIVER METASTASES OF COLORECTAL CANCER: A
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Version: 0 Date: 05 Feb 2023
Reviewer's report:
Nice research paper, the Authors clearly master the topic and the methodology.
We are nevertheless surprised - and need clarifications on 2 points
1) we missed the PROPSERO registration number. The registration of any systematic review,
with or without metanalysis, should be obtained.
2) neither forrest plots nor any other meta-analysis were provided for this SR. The reader struggle
to catch easily the conclusio of each comparison. Moreover, gicen the presence of clear groups
being compared with measurable effects, forrest plots could be generated. We strongly invite
the authors to provide graphical representation of each comparison, to increase fruibility of the
manuscript.
assistant