Title: Impact of Ahmadi Continuing Nursing Model on self-care ability, stoma complications
and quality of life of colostomy patients
Version: 1 Date: 20 Jun 2024
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for the opportunity to review your paper on a significant yet underexplored topic.
I commend your efforts in contributing to this field. However, I have some suggestions for
improvement:
1. Language Clarity: Some passages were difficult to understand, impacting the overall
comprehension. I recommend having the manuscript professionally edited for language clarity.
2. Methodological Details: The methodological section needs further elaboration. Specifically:
o On what premises has the number of participants been decided? Have you done any power
analysis?
o Presenting participant characteristics in a tabular format would improve readability and
facilitate comparison.
o Detailed information about the instruments used, including their validity, reliability, and
translation process, is crucial for readers to evaluate the study’s robustness.
3. Statistical Analysis: It is not explained whether the instruments were analyzed at the subscale
level or as a whole. Providing this information would enhance the reading and understanding
of the result.
Title: Impact of Ahmadi Continuing Nursing Model on self-care ability, stoma complications
and quality of life of colostomy patients
Version: 1 Date: 20 Jun 2024
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for the opportunity to review your paper on a significant yet underexplored topic.
I commend your efforts in contributing to this field. However, I have some suggestions for
improvement:
1. Language Clarity: Some passages were difficult to understand, impacting the overall
comprehension. I recommend having the manuscript professionally edited for language clarity.
2. Methodological Details: The methodological section needs further elaboration. Specifically:
o On what premises has the number of participants been decided? Have you done any power
analysis?
o Presenting participant characteristics in a tabular format would improve readability and
facilitate comparison.
o Detailed information about the instruments used, including their validity, reliability, and
translation process, is crucial for readers to evaluate the study’s robustness.
3. Statistical Analysis: It is not explained whether the instruments were analyzed at the subscale
level or as a whole. Providing this information would enhance the reading and understanding
of the result.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Impact of Ahmadi Continuing Nursing Model on self-care ability, stoma complications
and quality of life of colostomy patients
Version: 1 Date: 20 Jun 2024
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for the opportunity to review your paper on a significant yet underexplored topic.
I commend your efforts in contributing to this field. However, I have some suggestions for
improvement:
1. Language Clarity: Some passages were difficult to understand, impacting the overall
comprehension. I recommend having the manuscript professionally edited for language clarity.
2. Methodological Details: The methodological section needs further elaboration. Specifically:
o On what premises has the number of participants been decided? Have you done any power
analysis?
o Presenting participant characteristics in a tabular format would improve readability and
facilitate comparison.
o Detailed information about the instruments used, including their validity, reliability, and
translation process, is crucial for readers to evaluate the study’s robustness.
3. Statistical Analysis: It is not explained whether the instruments were analyzed at the subscale
level or as a whole. Providing this information would enhance the reading and understanding
of the result.
assistant