Reviewer's report
Title:Case report: Acute Pancreatitis Caused By Postcholecystectomic
Hemobilia.
Version: 3Date:23 January 2010
Reviewer: Nuno Almeida
Reviewer's report:
To the authors:
I appreciate reading and reviewing your manuscript entitled “Acute Pancreatitis
Following Hemobilia Caused by Right Hepatic Artery Psoudoaneurisma 5 Months
after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.” This case is interesting and documents
two possible late complications of a common surgical procedure but the spelling
and grammar need a major revision. Usually I give some suggestions about the
potential corrections that must be made but in this case it is virtually impossible
because I identified misspellings in all paragraphs. It is essential to review all
language before even considering further review and submission.
It is also important to note that the patient is identified in the CT images and it
seems that it has 50 years?? This is unacceptable! Please correct and present
only one image with the pseudoaneurysm clearly identified.
I hope these comments can be useful for you in the future.
Best wishes.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Not suitable for publication unless extensively edited
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:Case report: Acute Pancreatitis Caused By Postcholecystectomic
Hemobilia.
Version: 3Date:23 January 2010
Reviewer: Nuno Almeida
Reviewer's report:
To the authors:
I appreciate reading and reviewing your manuscript entitled “Acute Pancreatitis
Following Hemobilia Caused by Right Hepatic Artery Psoudoaneurisma 5 Months
after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.” This case is interesting and documents
two possible late complications of a common surgical procedure but the spelling
and grammar need a major revision. Usually I give some suggestions about the
potential corrections that must be made but in this case it is virtually impossible
because I identified misspellings in all paragraphs. It is essential to review all
language before even considering further review and submission.
It is also important to note that the patient is identified in the CT images and it
seems that it has 50 years?? This is unacceptable! Please correct and present
only one image with the pseudoaneurysm clearly identified.
I hope these comments can be useful for you in the future.
Best wishes.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Not suitable for publication unless extensively edited
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Case report: Acute Pancreatitis Caused By Postcholecystectomic
Hemobilia.
Version: 3Date:23 January 2010
Reviewer: Nuno Almeida
Reviewer's report:
To the authors:
I appreciate reading and reviewing your manuscript entitled “Acute Pancreatitis
Following Hemobilia Caused by Right Hepatic Artery Psoudoaneurisma 5 Months
after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.” This case is interesting and documents
two possible late complications of a common surgical procedure but the spelling
and grammar need a major revision. Usually I give some suggestions about the
potential corrections that must be made but in this case it is virtually impossible
because I identified misspellings in all paragraphs. It is essential to review all
language before even considering further review and submission.
It is also important to note that the patient is identified in the CT images and it
seems that it has 50 years?? This is unacceptable! Please correct and present
only one image with the pseudoaneurysm clearly identified.
I hope these comments can be useful for you in the future.
Best wishes.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Not suitable for publication unless extensively edited
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
assistant