Title: Long-term outcomes of refractory esophageal strictures after endoscopic submucosal
dissection of superficial esophageal neoplasms
Version: 4 Date: 16 Jan 2022
Reviewer's report:
To the author
Thank you for the opportunity of the review of the revised manuscript. I carefully read the revised
manuscript, and I mostly agreed with the revision.
However, I have one question before publication.
1. Author made new sentence in the results section as below “297 patients underwent 50-75%
circumferential###”. This evaluation is subjective. Author should state how to evaluate the
circumference of the resected area.
Title: Long-term outcomes of refractory esophageal strictures after endoscopic submucosal
dissection of superficial esophageal neoplasms
Version: 4 Date: 16 Jan 2022
Reviewer's report:
To the author
Thank you for the opportunity of the review of the revised manuscript. I carefully read the revised
manuscript, and I mostly agreed with the revision.
However, I have one question before publication.
1. Author made new sentence in the results section as below “297 patients underwent 50-75%
circumferential###”. This evaluation is subjective. Author should state how to evaluate the
circumference of the resected area.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Long-term outcomes of refractory esophageal strictures after endoscopic submucosal
dissection of superficial esophageal neoplasms
Version: 4 Date: 16 Jan 2022
Reviewer's report:
To the author
Thank you for the opportunity of the review of the revised manuscript. I carefully read the revised
manuscript, and I mostly agreed with the revision.
However, I have one question before publication.
1. Author made new sentence in the results section as below “297 patients underwent 50-75%
circumferential###”. This evaluation is subjective. Author should state how to evaluate the
circumference of the resected area.
assistant