Reviewer's report
Title:IgG4 Related Disease - A Retrospective Descriptive Study Highlighting
Canadian Experiences In Diagnosis And Management
Version: 2Date:16 February 2013
Reviewer: Siddharth Singh
Reviewer's report:
Discretionary Revisions:
Several key concerns raised by this reviewer have been acknowledged and/or
addressed. However, the discussion continues to be superficial and not very
helpful for the community gastroenterologist:
- The key findings of this descriptive study should be compared and contrasted to
current findings in the literature. For example, why do the authors feel the
response to corticosteroids was poor in this series?
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Reviewer's report
Title:IgG4 Related Disease - A Retrospective Descriptive Study Highlighting
Canadian Experiences In Diagnosis And Management
Version: 2Date:16 February 2013
Reviewer: Siddharth Singh
Reviewer's report:
Discretionary Revisions:
Several key concerns raised by this reviewer have been acknowledged and/or
addressed. However, the discussion continues to be superficial and not very
helpful for the community gastroenterologist:
- The key findings of this descriptive study should be compared and contrasted to
current findings in the literature. For example, why do the authors feel the
response to corticosteroids was poor in this series?
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:IgG4 Related Disease - A Retrospective Descriptive Study Highlighting
Canadian Experiences In Diagnosis And Management
Version: 2Date:16 February 2013
Reviewer: Siddharth Singh
Reviewer's report:
Discretionary Revisions:
Several key concerns raised by this reviewer have been acknowledged and/or
addressed. However, the discussion continues to be superficial and not very
helpful for the community gastroenterologist:
- The key findings of this descriptive study should be compared and contrasted to
current findings in the literature. For example, why do the authors feel the
response to corticosteroids was poor in this series?
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
assistant