Reviewer's report
Title:Esophagogastroduodenal pneumatosis with subsequent pneumoporta and
intramural duodenal hematoma after endoscopic hemostasis: a case report
Version:2Date:28 June 2015
Reviewer: Seng-Kee Chuah
Reviewer's report:
Minor Essential Revisions
It is still not clear why the patient did not receive surgery? This paper sounds like
encouraging suppertive medical treatment in such a serious complication. It
needs to be clarify on this point in the discussion section for surgery vs. medical
supportive treatment. This could be crucial for readers.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interest
Reviewer's report
Title:Esophagogastroduodenal pneumatosis with subsequent pneumoporta and
intramural duodenal hematoma after endoscopic hemostasis: a case report
Version:2Date:28 June 2015
Reviewer: Seng-Kee Chuah
Reviewer's report:
Minor Essential Revisions
It is still not clear why the patient did not receive surgery? This paper sounds like
encouraging suppertive medical treatment in such a serious complication. It
needs to be clarify on this point in the discussion section for surgery vs. medical
supportive treatment. This could be crucial for readers.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interest
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Esophagogastroduodenal pneumatosis with subsequent pneumoporta and
intramural duodenal hematoma after endoscopic hemostasis: a case report
Version:2Date:28 June 2015
Reviewer: Seng-Kee Chuah
Reviewer's report:
Minor Essential Revisions
It is still not clear why the patient did not receive surgery? This paper sounds like
encouraging suppertive medical treatment in such a serious complication. It
needs to be clarify on this point in the discussion section for surgery vs. medical
supportive treatment. This could be crucial for readers.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interest
assistant