Reviewer's report
Title:Drug-Induced Liver Injury due to Varenicline: A Case Report
Version: 1Date:11 April 2012
Reviewer: Nigel Bird
Reviewer's report:
This is an interesting paper on an unusual side effect of Varenicline; one that has
only been reported once in the literature. It is well written and describes the
clinical presentation in a comprehensive fashion. My only criticism is that I felt
that the Conclusions section was too long at over 4 pages. A more succinct,
focused set of Conclusions would have improved the impact and ease of
understanding of the message that the paper was trying to convey.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:Drug-Induced Liver Injury due to Varenicline: A Case Report
Version: 1Date:11 April 2012
Reviewer: Nigel Bird
Reviewer's report:
This is an interesting paper on an unusual side effect of Varenicline; one that has
only been reported once in the literature. It is well written and describes the
clinical presentation in a comprehensive fashion. My only criticism is that I felt
that the Conclusions section was too long at over 4 pages. A more succinct,
focused set of Conclusions would have improved the impact and ease of
understanding of the message that the paper was trying to convey.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Drug-Induced Liver Injury due to Varenicline: A Case Report
Version: 1Date:11 April 2012
Reviewer: Nigel Bird
Reviewer's report:
This is an interesting paper on an unusual side effect of Varenicline; one that has
only been reported once in the literature. It is well written and describes the
clinical presentation in a comprehensive fashion. My only criticism is that I felt
that the Conclusions section was too long at over 4 pages. A more succinct,
focused set of Conclusions would have improved the impact and ease of
understanding of the message that the paper was trying to convey.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
assistant