Reviewer's report
Title:Acute severe peritonitis due to typhoid intestinal perforation: primary repair
vs intestinal resection, associated with laparostomy. Results of a systematic
surgical approach in northwestern Benin.
Version: 2Date:8 February 2013
Reviewer: Avdyl Krasniqi
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor,
I would like to ask authors to make following minor essential revisions:
- Explain if there was any perforation of large bowel, and if was none, what was
the indication for colon resection in some cases. Also, clarify was it found faecal
contamination or the term was used to describe the small bowel content in the
peritoneal cavity.
- Describe how was cared laparostomy, covered with a sort of mesh or left open.
Kind regards
Avdyl Krasniqi
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Reviewer's report
Title:Acute severe peritonitis due to typhoid intestinal perforation: primary repair
vs intestinal resection, associated with laparostomy. Results of a systematic
surgical approach in northwestern Benin.
Version: 2Date:8 February 2013
Reviewer: Avdyl Krasniqi
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor,
I would like to ask authors to make following minor essential revisions:
- Explain if there was any perforation of large bowel, and if was none, what was
the indication for colon resection in some cases. Also, clarify was it found faecal
contamination or the term was used to describe the small bowel content in the
peritoneal cavity.
- Describe how was cared laparostomy, covered with a sort of mesh or left open.
Kind regards
Avdyl Krasniqi
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Acute severe peritonitis due to typhoid intestinal perforation: primary repair
vs intestinal resection, associated with laparostomy. Results of a systematic
surgical approach in northwestern Benin.
Version: 2Date:8 February 2013
Reviewer: Avdyl Krasniqi
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor,
I would like to ask authors to make following minor essential revisions:
- Explain if there was any perforation of large bowel, and if was none, what was
the indication for colon resection in some cases. Also, clarify was it found faecal
contamination or the term was used to describe the small bowel content in the
peritoneal cavity.
- Describe how was cared laparostomy, covered with a sort of mesh or left open.
Kind regards
Avdyl Krasniqi
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
assistant