Title: A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of continuous active warming in patients
undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy
Version: 4 Date: 07 Feb 2025
Reviewer:  Hilmi Yazici
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for letting me review this research. Hypothermia during the surgery is an
underestimated but important issue. Here are my comments to improve the manuscript:
1- The abstract is well-written in general. However, short information about the number of
patients after randomization and demographic results would be better for the quality of the
abstract.
2- The introduction is sufficient. In my opinion, changing the places of the first two paragraphs,
1 to 2 and 2 to 1, would be better for clearance.
3- 2.2 Subjects paragraph of the methods section should move to the results section.
Title: A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of continuous active warming in patients
undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy
Version: 4 Date: 07 Feb 2025
Reviewer:  Hilmi Yazici
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for letting me review this research. Hypothermia during the surgery is an
underestimated but important issue. Here are my comments to improve the manuscript:
1- The abstract is well-written in general. However, short information about the number of
patients after randomization and demographic results would be better for the quality of the
abstract.
2- The introduction is sufficient. In my opinion, changing the places of the first two paragraphs,
1 to 2 and 2 to 1, would be better for clearance.
3- 2.2 Subjects paragraph of the methods section should move to the results section.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of continuous active warming in patients
undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy
Version: 4 Date: 07 Feb 2025
Reviewer:  Hilmi Yazici
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for letting me review this research. Hypothermia during the surgery is an
underestimated but important issue. Here are my comments to improve the manuscript:
1- The abstract is well-written in general. However, short information about the number of
patients after randomization and demographic results would be better for the quality of the
abstract.
2- The introduction is sufficient. In my opinion, changing the places of the first two paragraphs,
1 to 2 and 2 to 1, would be better for clearance.
3- 2.2 Subjects paragraph of the methods section should move to the results section.
assistant