Reviewer's report
Title:Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected
appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled
trials
Version:2Date:28 January 2015
Reviewer: Gian Luca Baiocchi
Reviewer's report:
Discretionary Revisions
I compliment with the Authors for the very good work they did from a
methodological point of view. One only remark: why cosmetc results were not
considered in the outcome?
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Reviewer's report
Title:Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected
appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled
trials
Version:2Date:28 January 2015
Reviewer: Gian Luca Baiocchi
Reviewer's report:
Discretionary Revisions
I compliment with the Authors for the very good work they did from a
methodological point of view. One only remark: why cosmetc results were not
considered in the outcome?
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected
appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled
trials
Version:2Date:28 January 2015
Reviewer: Gian Luca Baiocchi
Reviewer's report:
Discretionary Revisions
I compliment with the Authors for the very good work they did from a
methodological point of view. One only remark: why cosmetc results were not
considered in the outcome?
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests
assistant