Reviewer's report
Title:Is hepatotropic contrast enhanced MR a more effective method in
differential diagnosis of hemangioma than multi-phase CT and unenhanced MR?
Version: 2Date:1 December 2010
Reviewer: herve trillaud
Reviewer's report:
The authors have revised the paper following my comments. The manuscript is
improved and I have no other comment.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Reviewer's report
Title:Is hepatotropic contrast enhanced MR a more effective method in
differential diagnosis of hemangioma than multi-phase CT and unenhanced MR?
Version: 2Date:1 December 2010
Reviewer: herve trillaud
Reviewer's report:
The authors have revised the paper following my comments. The manuscript is
improved and I have no other comment.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Is hepatotropic contrast enhanced MR a more effective method in
differential diagnosis of hemangioma than multi-phase CT and unenhanced MR?
Version: 2Date:1 December 2010
Reviewer: herve trillaud
Reviewer's report:
The authors have revised the paper following my comments. The manuscript is
improved and I have no other comment.
Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely
related research interests
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
assistant