Title: Explainable machine learning model for predicting acute pancreatitis mortality in the
intensive care unit
Version: 4 Date: 20 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
The manuscript is clear and well-explained. Although you chose not to include the model
calibration, I still consider it a crucial aspect of the analysis. Furthermore, I would suggest
emphasizing the distinction between a model's classification, discrimination, and calibration
abilities. I found only one minor typo on page 16, line 9: 'Second, the etiology of AP were...'
should be corrected to 'was.'
Title: Explainable machine learning model for predicting acute pancreatitis mortality in the
intensive care unit
Version: 4 Date: 20 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
The manuscript is clear and well-explained. Although you chose not to include the model
calibration, I still consider it a crucial aspect of the analysis. Furthermore, I would suggest
emphasizing the distinction between a model's classification, discrimination, and calibration
abilities. I found only one minor typo on page 16, line 9: 'Second, the etiology of AP were...'
should be corrected to 'was.'
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Explainable machine learning model for predicting acute pancreatitis mortality in the
intensive care unit
Version: 4 Date: 20 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
The manuscript is clear and well-explained. Although you chose not to include the model
calibration, I still consider it a crucial aspect of the analysis. Furthermore, I would suggest
emphasizing the distinction between a model's classification, discrimination, and calibration
abilities. I found only one minor typo on page 16, line 9: 'Second, the etiology of AP were...'
should be corrected to 'was.'
assistant