Reviewer's report
Title:Diagnostic yield of endoscopy in patients with abdominal complaints:
Incremental value of fecal calprotectin on guidelines of appropriateness
Version:2Date:28 February 2014
Reviewer: Petr Ricanek
Reviewer's report:
I have looked through all attached files, including revised manuscript, cover
letter, and earlier reviews.
The issues raised by the other reviewers and myself have been satisfactory
adressed in the cover letter and revised manuscript.
I recommend acceptance of the revised manuscript without further revision.
As earlier stated, I have no conflicts of interest.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I have no competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:Diagnostic yield of endoscopy in patients with abdominal complaints:
Incremental value of fecal calprotectin on guidelines of appropriateness
Version:2Date:28 February 2014
Reviewer: Petr Ricanek
Reviewer's report:
I have looked through all attached files, including revised manuscript, cover
letter, and earlier reviews.
The issues raised by the other reviewers and myself have been satisfactory
adressed in the cover letter and revised manuscript.
I recommend acceptance of the revised manuscript without further revision.
As earlier stated, I have no conflicts of interest.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I have no competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Diagnostic yield of endoscopy in patients with abdominal complaints:
Incremental value of fecal calprotectin on guidelines of appropriateness
Version:2Date:28 February 2014
Reviewer: Petr Ricanek
Reviewer's report:
I have looked through all attached files, including revised manuscript, cover
letter, and earlier reviews.
The issues raised by the other reviewers and myself have been satisfactory
adressed in the cover letter and revised manuscript.
I recommend acceptance of the revised manuscript without further revision.
As earlier stated, I have no conflicts of interest.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I have no competing interests.
assistant