Title: Exclusive Enteral Nutrition Remodels the Intestinal Flora in Patients with Active Crohn's
Disease
Version: 3 Date: 02 Apr 2022
Reviewer's report:
Thank you the revisions made to the MS
SPECIFIC COMMENTS
1. The methods section of the ABSTRACT still contains the details of the number of subjects:
this detail has not yet been moved to the results section of the ABSTRACT where it belongs
2. The INTRO is shorter, but could be shortened further
3.  Sources of products (e.g. Infliximab) must contain the details of the manufacturer with city/
country  details (as per standard practice)
4. At line 125, there are still details of the subjects included in the METHODS. Again, these
need to be moved to the RESULTS section
5. The METHODS (line 125) suggests that 3 grams of stool was collected. Yet later we learn that
3 grams were used for SCFA analysis, meaning that none was left for other items. Please clarify
6. Table 1 refers to the Montreal classification. This was  not detailed in the METHODS section:
it should be mentioned there with relevant reference
7. lines 210/211 states that the faecal flora increases: it is unclear what this means
8. There are still many sentences with inappropriate language/grammar throughout the MS
9. Going back to the TITLE: is regulate the best/most appropriate word? please reconsider
Title: Exclusive Enteral Nutrition Remodels the Intestinal Flora in Patients with Active Crohn's
Disease
Version: 3 Date: 02 Apr 2022
Reviewer's report:
Thank you the revisions made to the MS
SPECIFIC COMMENTS
1. The methods section of the ABSTRACT still contains the details of the number of subjects:
this detail has not yet been moved to the results section of the ABSTRACT where it belongs
2. The INTRO is shorter, but could be shortened further
3.  Sources of products (e.g. Infliximab) must contain the details of the manufacturer with city/
country  details (as per standard practice)
4. At line 125, there are still details of the subjects included in the METHODS. Again, these
need to be moved to the RESULTS section
5. The METHODS (line 125) suggests that 3 grams of stool was collected. Yet later we learn that
3 grams were used for SCFA analysis, meaning that none was left for other items. Please clarify
6. Table 1 refers to the Montreal classification. This was  not detailed in the METHODS section:
it should be mentioned there with relevant reference
7. lines 210/211 states that the faecal flora increases: it is unclear what this means
8. There are still many sentences with inappropriate language/grammar throughout the MS
9. Going back to the TITLE: is regulate the best/most appropriate word? please reconsider
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Exclusive Enteral Nutrition Remodels the Intestinal Flora in Patients with Active Crohn's
Disease
Version: 3 Date: 02 Apr 2022
Reviewer's report:
Thank you the revisions made to the MS
SPECIFIC COMMENTS
1. The methods section of the ABSTRACT still contains the details of the number of subjects:
this detail has not yet been moved to the results section of the ABSTRACT where it belongs
2. The INTRO is shorter, but could be shortened further
3.  Sources of products (e.g. Infliximab) must contain the details of the manufacturer with city/
country  details (as per standard practice)
4. At line 125, there are still details of the subjects included in the METHODS. Again, these
need to be moved to the RESULTS section
5. The METHODS (line 125) suggests that 3 grams of stool was collected. Yet later we learn that
3 grams were used for SCFA analysis, meaning that none was left for other items. Please clarify
6. Table 1 refers to the Montreal classification. This was  not detailed in the METHODS section:
it should be mentioned there with relevant reference
7. lines 210/211 states that the faecal flora increases: it is unclear what this means
8. There are still many sentences with inappropriate language/grammar throughout the MS
9. Going back to the TITLE: is regulate the best/most appropriate word? please reconsider
assistant