Title: Unraveling the role of early coeliac disease diagnosis in the risk of developing immune-
mediated renal diseases
Version: 2 Date: 15 Oct 2024
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor,
I should first thank for inviting me as potential reviewer to read and comment on paper entitled
‘Unraveling the role of early coeliac disease diagnosis in the risk of developing immune-
mediated renal diseases’’.
In the current study, the authors aimed to identify any significant variation of the risk of renal
autoimmune disorders in the CD population.
The main title accurately reflects the major topic and content of the study.
The abstract summarizes and reflects the work described in the manuscript. Also, the abstract
presents the significant points related to the background, objectives, materials and methods,
results and conclusions.
The materials and methods sufficiently described for the results and conclusions that are
presented in the preceding sections. The study type and design were defined in the section of
the materials and methods. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are well defined. Figures and tables
are sufficient and well-organized. Ethics Committee approval was received. So, the section
materials and methods is adequate.
The statistical methods used are appropriate.
The section of the discussion is well organized. The conclusions are drawn appropriately
supported by the literature. The manuscript adequately describes the background, present
status and significance of the study. The manuscript interprets the findings adequately and
appropriately, highlighting the key points clearly.
I think that it will contribute to the literature. I have some minor criticisms.
- The manuscript appropriately cites the important and authoritative references but does not cite
the recent published articles in the background section of the manuscript. If the recent published
article about celiac disease for example ‘’ Celiac disease in children: A review of the literature.
World J Clin Pediatr. 2021 Jul 9;10(4):53-71’’ are cited, the manuscript would be better.
- Has there been a comparison in terms of IMRD risk between celiac patients who adhere to the
diet and those who do not? If so, should this be stated?
Title: Unraveling the role of early coeliac disease diagnosis in the risk of developing immune-
mediated renal diseases
Version: 2 Date: 15 Oct 2024
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor,
I should first thank for inviting me as potential reviewer to read and comment on paper entitled
‘Unraveling the role of early coeliac disease diagnosis in the risk of developing immune-
mediated renal diseases’’.
In the current study, the authors aimed to identify any significant variation of the risk of renal
autoimmune disorders in the CD population.
The main title accurately reflects the major topic and content of the study.
The abstract summarizes and reflects the work described in the manuscript. Also, the abstract
presents the significant points related to the background, objectives, materials and methods,
results and conclusions.
The materials and methods sufficiently described for the results and conclusions that are
presented in the preceding sections. The study type and design were defined in the section of
the materials and methods. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are well defined. Figures and tables
are sufficient and well-organized. Ethics Committee approval was received. So, the section
materials and methods is adequate.
The statistical methods used are appropriate.
The section of the discussion is well organized. The conclusions are drawn appropriately
supported by the literature. The manuscript adequately describes the background, present
status and significance of the study. The manuscript interprets the findings adequately and
appropriately, highlighting the key points clearly.
I think that it will contribute to the literature. I have some minor criticisms.
- The manuscript appropriately cites the important and authoritative references but does not cite
the recent published articles in the background section of the manuscript. If the recent published
article about celiac disease for example ‘’ Celiac disease in children: A review of the literature.
World J Clin Pediatr. 2021 Jul 9;10(4):53-71’’ are cited, the manuscript would be better.
- Has there been a comparison in terms of IMRD risk between celiac patients who adhere to the
diet and those who do not? If so, should this be stated?
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Unraveling the role of early coeliac disease diagnosis in the risk of developing immune-
mediated renal diseases
Version: 2 Date: 15 Oct 2024
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor,
I should first thank for inviting me as potential reviewer to read and comment on paper entitled
‘Unraveling the role of early coeliac disease diagnosis in the risk of developing immune-
mediated renal diseases’’.
In the current study, the authors aimed to identify any significant variation of the risk of renal
autoimmune disorders in the CD population.
The main title accurately reflects the major topic and content of the study.
The abstract summarizes and reflects the work described in the manuscript. Also, the abstract
presents the significant points related to the background, objectives, materials and methods,
results and conclusions.
The materials and methods sufficiently described for the results and conclusions that are
presented in the preceding sections. The study type and design were defined in the section of
the materials and methods. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are well defined. Figures and tables
are sufficient and well-organized. Ethics Committee approval was received. So, the section
materials and methods is adequate.
The statistical methods used are appropriate.
The section of the discussion is well organized. The conclusions are drawn appropriately
supported by the literature. The manuscript adequately describes the background, present
status and significance of the study. The manuscript interprets the findings adequately and
appropriately, highlighting the key points clearly.
I think that it will contribute to the literature. I have some minor criticisms.
- The manuscript appropriately cites the important and authoritative references but does not cite
the recent published articles in the background section of the manuscript. If the recent published
article about celiac disease for example ‘’ Celiac disease in children: A review of the literature.
World J Clin Pediatr. 2021 Jul 9;10(4):53-71’’ are cited, the manuscript would be better.
- Has there been a comparison in terms of IMRD risk between celiac patients who adhere to the
diet and those who do not? If so, should this be stated?
assistant