Title: Development and application of an artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy system for
diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: a multicenter randomized controlled study
Version: 1 Date: 03 Apr 2024
Reviewer:  Tahne Vongsavath
Reviewer's report:
Abstract:
-please add associated abbreviation to complete phrase Helicobacter pylori (H. Pylori)
- "good diagnositic ability" consider rewording. "significant ability for diagnostic use" or
something of the like
Intro
-"Gastric mucosa that is positive for H. pylori typically has diffuse redness, spotty redness"
consider combining redness characteristics "diffuse or spotty redness"
-"Gastric mucosa that is negative for H. pylori typically has a RAC, and may have fundic
gland polyposis, a red streak in the gastric antrum and gastric body, and attachment of a former
bleeding spot" Is this accurate?
-red areas of various sizes on white mucosa, and redness after erosion healing appears as patchy
redness. sentence feels redundant
Training algorhythm
-When SENet was proposed, it achieved the highest accuracy on Imagenet data at that time. is
there a value for accuracy?
-please add section data for estimation of sample size (2.7a) and analysis of outcome (2.7b) or
something similar
Discussion:
This may be because in the professional training for early cancer detection, the recognition
of H. pylori status of gastric mucosa using endoscopy is very important for determining the
mucosal background of gastric cancer, so these specially trained endoscopists are familiar with
the manifestations of H. pylori infection and pay close attention to these observations. Consider
rewording for ease of reading
AI system, corresponding to an accuracy of 83.3% and a sensitivity of 100% (data not shown).
why? if not adding data maybe do not need to add data not shown or consider adding to next
sentence, "data was not included in study as it only resulted from 6 patients"
Authors may consider not including the addition of (data not included) in the discussion without
explanation why, or consider excluding the statement all together.
Title: Development and application of an artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy system for
diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: a multicenter randomized controlled study
Version: 1 Date: 03 Apr 2024
Reviewer:  Tahne Vongsavath
Reviewer's report:
Abstract:
-please add associated abbreviation to complete phrase Helicobacter pylori (H. Pylori)
- "good diagnositic ability" consider rewording. "significant ability for diagnostic use" or
something of the like
Intro
-"Gastric mucosa that is positive for H. pylori typically has diffuse redness, spotty redness"
consider combining redness characteristics "diffuse or spotty redness"
-"Gastric mucosa that is negative for H. pylori typically has a RAC, and may have fundic
gland polyposis, a red streak in the gastric antrum and gastric body, and attachment of a former
bleeding spot" Is this accurate?
-red areas of various sizes on white mucosa, and redness after erosion healing appears as patchy
redness. sentence feels redundant
Training algorhythm
-When SENet was proposed, it achieved the highest accuracy on Imagenet data at that time. is
there a value for accuracy?
-please add section data for estimation of sample size (2.7a) and analysis of outcome (2.7b) or
something similar
Discussion:
This may be because in the professional training for early cancer detection, the recognition
of H. pylori status of gastric mucosa using endoscopy is very important for determining the
mucosal background of gastric cancer, so these specially trained endoscopists are familiar with
the manifestations of H. pylori infection and pay close attention to these observations. Consider
rewording for ease of reading
AI system, corresponding to an accuracy of 83.3% and a sensitivity of 100% (data not shown).
why? if not adding data maybe do not need to add data not shown or consider adding to next
sentence, "data was not included in study as it only resulted from 6 patients"
Authors may consider not including the addition of (data not included) in the discussion without
explanation why, or consider excluding the statement all together.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Development and application of an artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy system for
diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: a multicenter randomized controlled study
Version: 1 Date: 03 Apr 2024
Reviewer:  Tahne Vongsavath
Reviewer's report:
Abstract:
-please add associated abbreviation to complete phrase Helicobacter pylori (H. Pylori)
- "good diagnositic ability" consider rewording. "significant ability for diagnostic use" or
something of the like
Intro
-"Gastric mucosa that is positive for H. pylori typically has diffuse redness, spotty redness"
consider combining redness characteristics "diffuse or spotty redness"
-"Gastric mucosa that is negative for H. pylori typically has a RAC, and may have fundic
gland polyposis, a red streak in the gastric antrum and gastric body, and attachment of a former
bleeding spot" Is this accurate?
-red areas of various sizes on white mucosa, and redness after erosion healing appears as patchy
redness. sentence feels redundant
Training algorhythm
-When SENet was proposed, it achieved the highest accuracy on Imagenet data at that time. is
there a value for accuracy?
-please add section data for estimation of sample size (2.7a) and analysis of outcome (2.7b) or
something similar
Discussion:
This may be because in the professional training for early cancer detection, the recognition
of H. pylori status of gastric mucosa using endoscopy is very important for determining the
mucosal background of gastric cancer, so these specially trained endoscopists are familiar with
the manifestations of H. pylori infection and pay close attention to these observations. Consider
rewording for ease of reading
AI system, corresponding to an accuracy of 83.3% and a sensitivity of 100% (data not shown).
why? if not adding data maybe do not need to add data not shown or consider adding to next
sentence, "data was not included in study as it only resulted from 6 patients"
Authors may consider not including the addition of (data not included) in the discussion without
explanation why, or consider excluding the statement all together.
assistant