Title: A Systematic Review of the Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Severity and Recurrence
of Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis
Version: 1 Date: 10 Mar 2025
Reviewer:  #ukasz Nawacki
Reviewer's report:
The authors present a systemic review of patients with hypertriglicerydemia induced acute
pancreatitis.
Overall, the manuscript has many grammar mistakes or missing words/letters, for example:
line 89 "he treatment strategy"
line 123 "only included" shouldn't it be "one included"
line 135 "included study basic information" - what included? I know that the data retriewed
included but without it the sentence is incomprehensible.
lines 155-158 the sentence is unintelligible
any many others. I recommend to recheck the manuscript.
I'm missing a point when was the string for the article searched - exact date.
I'm missing a point about the consent of the bioethical committee - why is it nopt applicable?
It's hard to compare studies with such wide range of HT-AP diagnosis criteria - in the table the
HTG definition is from: > 153 mg/dl through >500, > 1000, >1772, > 5000. In my opinion the
extreme ranges should be excluded because they are not any formal diagnostic criteria of any
international society.
Title: A Systematic Review of the Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Severity and Recurrence
of Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis
Version: 1 Date: 10 Mar 2025
Reviewer:  #ukasz Nawacki
Reviewer's report:
The authors present a systemic review of patients with hypertriglicerydemia induced acute
pancreatitis.
Overall, the manuscript has many grammar mistakes or missing words/letters, for example:
line 89 "he treatment strategy"
line 123 "only included" shouldn't it be "one included"
line 135 "included study basic information" - what included? I know that the data retriewed
included but without it the sentence is incomprehensible.
lines 155-158 the sentence is unintelligible
any many others. I recommend to recheck the manuscript.
I'm missing a point when was the string for the article searched - exact date.
I'm missing a point about the consent of the bioethical committee - why is it nopt applicable?
It's hard to compare studies with such wide range of HT-AP diagnosis criteria - in the table the
HTG definition is from: > 153 mg/dl through >500, > 1000, >1772, > 5000. In my opinion the
extreme ranges should be excluded because they are not any formal diagnostic criteria of any
international society.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: A Systematic Review of the Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Severity and Recurrence
of Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis
Version: 1 Date: 10 Mar 2025
Reviewer:  #ukasz Nawacki
Reviewer's report:
The authors present a systemic review of patients with hypertriglicerydemia induced acute
pancreatitis.
Overall, the manuscript has many grammar mistakes or missing words/letters, for example:
line 89 "he treatment strategy"
line 123 "only included" shouldn't it be "one included"
line 135 "included study basic information" - what included? I know that the data retriewed
included but without it the sentence is incomprehensible.
lines 155-158 the sentence is unintelligible
any many others. I recommend to recheck the manuscript.
I'm missing a point when was the string for the article searched - exact date.
I'm missing a point about the consent of the bioethical committee - why is it nopt applicable?
It's hard to compare studies with such wide range of HT-AP diagnosis criteria - in the table the
HTG definition is from: > 153 mg/dl through >500, > 1000, >1772, > 5000. In my opinion the
extreme ranges should be excluded because they are not any formal diagnostic criteria of any
international society.
assistant