Title: Number of endoscopic sessions to eradicate varices identifies high risk of rebleeding in
cirrhotic patients
Version: 2 Date: 12 Jan 2022
Reviewer's report:
The paper is interesting and well written. I  have the following comments:
1) When only one variable is significant at univariate analysis, multivariate analysis  makes no
sense . Please revise the table  2 accordingly.
2) In the Kaplan Meyer curves (Figure 2A and 3), please add the number  of patients at risk
3) Median follow-up should be expressed as median and 95% confidence interval (not range)
4) What was the role of antithrombotic drugs on the final outcome?
Title: Number of endoscopic sessions to eradicate varices identifies high risk of rebleeding in
cirrhotic patients
Version: 2 Date: 12 Jan 2022
Reviewer's report:
The paper is interesting and well written. I  have the following comments:
1) When only one variable is significant at univariate analysis, multivariate analysis  makes no
sense . Please revise the table  2 accordingly.
2) In the Kaplan Meyer curves (Figure 2A and 3), please add the number  of patients at risk
3) Median follow-up should be expressed as median and 95% confidence interval (not range)
4) What was the role of antithrombotic drugs on the final outcome?
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Number of endoscopic sessions to eradicate varices identifies high risk of rebleeding in
cirrhotic patients
Version: 2 Date: 12 Jan 2022
Reviewer's report:
The paper is interesting and well written. I  have the following comments:
1) When only one variable is significant at univariate analysis, multivariate analysis  makes no
sense . Please revise the table  2 accordingly.
2) In the Kaplan Meyer curves (Figure 2A and 3), please add the number  of patients at risk
3) Median follow-up should be expressed as median and 95% confidence interval (not range)
4) What was the role of antithrombotic drugs on the final outcome?
assistant