Title: COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PANCREATIC CANCER TREATMENTS: A
THREE-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY IN THE ONCOLOGY CENTER OF TANGIER
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, MOROCCO
Version: 0 Date: 31 Aug 2023
Reviewer's report:
I had the honor of reviewing your research article .  Overall, it was good  though revisions will
be requested.
The originality of the study can be assessed as average although it reports a unique experience in
an oncology center in Morocco. In my opinion, a brief paragraph should be included to describe
the interest of the study in the context of your country.
Title : the title does not perfectly reflect the objectives of the study and the comparison of two
medical treatments. Try to improve the title to make it more interesting and attractive.
"in our study" has been used and spotted several times throughout the text, you can change it
to in the current study or in this study.
In the Discussion :
Other retrospective studies have previously been carried out in Morocco, including
similar epidemiologic, clinical and therapeutic features, such as « Bazine A,
Fetohi M, Tores M, Tanz R, Tahiri ME, Choho A, Ichou M.Pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinoma in a Moroccan population: analysis of six years experience. Int
Surg J2018;5:1628-32. » or on a population of young patients, such as «
RaissouniS,RaisG,MrabtiH,RaissouniF,MouzountH,AitelhajM,etal.Pancreaticadenocarcinomainyoungadultsinamoroccanpopulation.JGastrointestCancer.2012;43(4):607-11.
» . So, it is highly desirable to cite them and include them in the discussion to compare
populations similar to the patients in your studies.
The discussion is otherwise well structured
the level of English is good
the conclusion is long; I suggest reducing it and reporting only the conclusions of the study and
the recommendations or proposals made by the authors.
Title: COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PANCREATIC CANCER TREATMENTS: A
THREE-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY IN THE ONCOLOGY CENTER OF TANGIER
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, MOROCCO
Version: 0 Date: 31 Aug 2023
Reviewer's report:
I had the honor of reviewing your research article .  Overall, it was good  though revisions will
be requested.
The originality of the study can be assessed as average although it reports a unique experience in
an oncology center in Morocco. In my opinion, a brief paragraph should be included to describe
the interest of the study in the context of your country.
Title : the title does not perfectly reflect the objectives of the study and the comparison of two
medical treatments. Try to improve the title to make it more interesting and attractive.
"in our study" has been used and spotted several times throughout the text, you can change it
to in the current study or in this study.
In the Discussion :
Other retrospective studies have previously been carried out in Morocco, including
similar epidemiologic, clinical and therapeutic features, such as « Bazine A,
Fetohi M, Tores M, Tanz R, Tahiri ME, Choho A, Ichou M.Pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinoma in a Moroccan population: analysis of six years experience. Int
Surg J2018;5:1628-32. » or on a population of young patients, such as «
RaissouniS,RaisG,MrabtiH,RaissouniF,MouzountH,AitelhajM,etal.Pancreaticadenocarcinomainyoungadultsinamoroccanpopulation.JGastrointestCancer.2012;43(4):607-11.
» . So, it is highly desirable to cite them and include them in the discussion to compare
populations similar to the patients in your studies.
The discussion is otherwise well structured
the level of English is good
the conclusion is long; I suggest reducing it and reporting only the conclusions of the study and
the recommendations or proposals made by the authors.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PANCREATIC CANCER TREATMENTS: A
THREE-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY IN THE ONCOLOGY CENTER OF TANGIER
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, MOROCCO
Version: 0 Date: 31 Aug 2023
Reviewer's report:
I had the honor of reviewing your research article .  Overall, it was good  though revisions will
be requested.
The originality of the study can be assessed as average although it reports a unique experience in
an oncology center in Morocco. In my opinion, a brief paragraph should be included to describe
the interest of the study in the context of your country.
Title : the title does not perfectly reflect the objectives of the study and the comparison of two
medical treatments. Try to improve the title to make it more interesting and attractive.
"in our study" has been used and spotted several times throughout the text, you can change it
to in the current study or in this study.
In the Discussion :
Other retrospective studies have previously been carried out in Morocco, including
similar epidemiologic, clinical and therapeutic features, such as « Bazine A,
Fetohi M, Tores M, Tanz R, Tahiri ME, Choho A, Ichou M.Pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinoma in a Moroccan population: analysis of six years experience. Int
Surg J2018;5:1628-32. » or on a population of young patients, such as «
RaissouniS,RaisG,MrabtiH,RaissouniF,MouzountH,AitelhajM,etal.Pancreaticadenocarcinomainyoungadultsinamoroccanpopulation.JGastrointestCancer.2012;43(4):607-11.
» . So, it is highly desirable to cite them and include them in the discussion to compare
populations similar to the patients in your studies.
The discussion is otherwise well structured
the level of English is good
the conclusion is long; I suggest reducing it and reporting only the conclusions of the study and
the recommendations or proposals made by the authors.
assistant