Reviewer's report
Title:Is hepatotropic contrast enhanced MR a more effective method in
differential diagnosis of hemangioma than multi-phase CT and unenhanced MR?
Version: 3Date:5 March 2011
Reviewer: Takamichi Murakami
Reviewer's report:
The authors have revised their manuscript well according to my suggestions.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:Is hepatotropic contrast enhanced MR a more effective method in
differential diagnosis of hemangioma than multi-phase CT and unenhanced MR?
Version: 3Date:5 March 2011
Reviewer: Takamichi Murakami
Reviewer's report:
The authors have revised their manuscript well according to my suggestions.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Is hepatotropic contrast enhanced MR a more effective method in
differential diagnosis of hemangioma than multi-phase CT and unenhanced MR?
Version: 3Date:5 March 2011
Reviewer: Takamichi Murakami
Reviewer's report:
The authors have revised their manuscript well according to my suggestions.
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
I declare that I have no competing interests.
assistant