Reviewer's report 
 Stent versus gastrojejunostomy for the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review Title: 
 1  12 March 2007 Version: Date: 
 Todd Baron Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
General 
excellent review, very comprehensive 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Major Compulsory Revisions (that the author must respond to before a decision on publication can be reached) 
None 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Minor Essential Revisions (such as missing labels on figures, or the wrong use of a term, which the author can be trusted to correct) 
None 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discretionary Revisions (which the author can choose to ignore) On page 12, paragraph 2, one of the other factors which may contribute to the wide variation in 
complications (as well as success) is operator experience. 
 Accept without revision What next?: 
 An article of importance in its field Level of interest: 
 Acceptable Quality of written English: 
 Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the statistics. Statistical review: 
Declaration of competing interests: 
I declare that I have no competing interests 
Reviewer's report 
 Stent versus gastrojejunostomy for the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review Title: 
 1  12 March 2007 Version: Date: 
 Todd Baron Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
General 
excellent review, very comprehensive 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Major Compulsory Revisions (that the author must respond to before a decision on publication can be reached) 
None 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Minor Essential Revisions (such as missing labels on figures, or the wrong use of a term, which the author can be trusted to correct) 
None 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discretionary Revisions (which the author can choose to ignore) On page 12, paragraph 2, one of the other factors which may contribute to the wide variation in 
complications (as well as success) is operator experience. 
 Accept without revision What next?: 
 An article of importance in its field Level of interest: 
 Acceptable Quality of written English: 
 Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the statistics. Statistical review: 
Declaration of competing interests: 
I declare that I have no competing interests 
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report 
 Stent versus gastrojejunostomy for the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review Title: 
 1  12 March 2007 Version: Date: 
 Todd Baron Reviewer: 
Reviewer's report: 
General 
excellent review, very comprehensive 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Major Compulsory Revisions (that the author must respond to before a decision on publication can be reached) 
None 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Minor Essential Revisions (such as missing labels on figures, or the wrong use of a term, which the author can be trusted to correct) 
None 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discretionary Revisions (which the author can choose to ignore) On page 12, paragraph 2, one of the other factors which may contribute to the wide variation in 
complications (as well as success) is operator experience. 
 Accept without revision What next?: 
 An article of importance in its field Level of interest: 
 Acceptable Quality of written English: 
 Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the statistics. Statistical review: 
Declaration of competing interests: 
I declare that I have no competing interests 
assistant