Title: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori that contributes to hepatogenic ulcer is beneficial to
the healing of hepatogenic ulcer
Version: 4 Date: 26 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: The criticisms and responses were reviewed step by step. The
authors provided sufficient and appropriate answers to the questions in the evaluations. They
also transferred their answers appropriately to the text. The text became much better thanks to
the changes and additions made. It is a beautiful text that can contribute to the literature.
ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/SUGGESTIONS:
none
Title: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori that contributes to hepatogenic ulcer is beneficial to
the healing of hepatogenic ulcer
Version: 4 Date: 26 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: The criticisms and responses were reviewed step by step. The
authors provided sufficient and appropriate answers to the questions in the evaluations. They
also transferred their answers appropriately to the text. The text became much better thanks to
the changes and additions made. It is a beautiful text that can contribute to the literature.
ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/SUGGESTIONS:
none
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori that contributes to hepatogenic ulcer is beneficial to
the healing of hepatogenic ulcer
Version: 4 Date: 26 Feb 2025
Reviewer's report:
PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: The criticisms and responses were reviewed step by step. The
authors provided sufficient and appropriate answers to the questions in the evaluations. They
also transferred their answers appropriately to the text. The text became much better thanks to
the changes and additions made. It is a beautiful text that can contribute to the literature.
ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/SUGGESTIONS:
none
assistant