Reviewer's report
Title:Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines in Canada
Version: 1Date:23 July 2007
Reviewer: Theodore Levin
Reviewer's report:
General
Very important information about predictors of screening exposure. I agree with
the interpretation that screening will not be successful if we rely on "opportunistic
screening" to occur during primary care physician visits.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major Compulsory Revisions (that the author must respond to before a decision
on publication can be reached)
None.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minor Essential Revisions (such as missing labels on figures, or the wrong use of
a term, which the author can be trusted to correct)
None.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discretionary Revisions (which the author can choose to ignore)
None.
What next?: Accept without revision
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
No competing interests.
Reviewer's report
Title:Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines in Canada
Version: 1Date:23 July 2007
Reviewer: Theodore Levin
Reviewer's report:
General
Very important information about predictors of screening exposure. I agree with
the interpretation that screening will not be successful if we rely on "opportunistic
screening" to occur during primary care physician visits.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major Compulsory Revisions (that the author must respond to before a decision
on publication can be reached)
None.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minor Essential Revisions (such as missing labels on figures, or the wrong use of
a term, which the author can be trusted to correct)
None.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discretionary Revisions (which the author can choose to ignore)
None.
What next?: Accept without revision
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
No competing interests.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines in Canada
Version: 1Date:23 July 2007
Reviewer: Theodore Levin
Reviewer's report:
General
Very important information about predictors of screening exposure. I agree with
the interpretation that screening will not be successful if we rely on "opportunistic
screening" to occur during primary care physician visits.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major Compulsory Revisions (that the author must respond to before a decision
on publication can be reached)
None.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minor Essential Revisions (such as missing labels on figures, or the wrong use of
a term, which the author can be trusted to correct)
None.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discretionary Revisions (which the author can choose to ignore)
None.
What next?: Accept without revision
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
No competing interests.
assistant