Reviewer's report
Title:Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in a
Chinese retiree cohort
Version: 1Date:15 June 2012
Reviewer: P. Marco Fisichella
Reviewer's report:
1. Is the question posed by the authors well defined? Yes
2. Are the methods appropriate and well described? Yes
3. Are the data sound? Yes
4. Does the manuscript adhere to the relevant standards for reporting and data
deposition? n/a
5. Are the discussion and conclusions well balanced and adequately supported
by the data? Yes
6. Are limitations of the work clearly stated? Yes
7. Do the authors clearly acknowledge any work upon which they are building,
both published and unpublished? n/a
8. Do the title and abstract accurately convey what has been found? Yes
9. Is the writing acceptable? Yes
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Reviewer's report
Title:Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in a
Chinese retiree cohort
Version: 1Date:15 June 2012
Reviewer: P. Marco Fisichella
Reviewer's report:
1. Is the question posed by the authors well defined? Yes
2. Are the methods appropriate and well described? Yes
3. Are the data sound? Yes
4. Does the manuscript adhere to the relevant standards for reporting and data
deposition? n/a
5. Are the discussion and conclusions well balanced and adequately supported
by the data? Yes
6. Are limitations of the work clearly stated? Yes
7. Do the authors clearly acknowledge any work upon which they are building,
both published and unpublished? n/a
8. Do the title and abstract accurately convey what has been found? Yes
9. Is the writing acceptable? Yes
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in a
Chinese retiree cohort
Version: 1Date:15 June 2012
Reviewer: P. Marco Fisichella
Reviewer's report:
1. Is the question posed by the authors well defined? Yes
2. Are the methods appropriate and well described? Yes
3. Are the data sound? Yes
4. Does the manuscript adhere to the relevant standards for reporting and data
deposition? n/a
5. Are the discussion and conclusions well balanced and adequately supported
by the data? Yes
6. Are limitations of the work clearly stated? Yes
7. Do the authors clearly acknowledge any work upon which they are building,
both published and unpublished? n/a
8. Do the title and abstract accurately convey what has been found? Yes
9. Is the writing acceptable? Yes
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
assistant