Title: Semantic clustering analysis of E3-ubiquitin ligases in gastrointestinal tract defines genes
ontology clusters with tissue expression patterns
Version: 7 Date: 20 Feb 2022
Reviewer's report:
This reviewer could not find the name of Bard1 in either Additional table 2 or Fig S2, although
BRCC3 is  indeed in Fig S2. The reviewer also has to point out that neither Diablo nor IRAK1
is considered as a ubiquitin ligase, however, the authors listed them in the data of Fig S2. The
reviewer searched the whole manuscript, and could not find any explanation why these two
genes are there.  Well, the reviewer understand this is about a method, however, you can’t prove
a method based on wrong information. The reviewer is just curious why the authors could not
find any better example to prove their method?
Title: Semantic clustering analysis of E3-ubiquitin ligases in gastrointestinal tract defines genes
ontology clusters with tissue expression patterns
Version: 7 Date: 20 Feb 2022
Reviewer's report:
This reviewer could not find the name of Bard1 in either Additional table 2 or Fig S2, although
BRCC3 is  indeed in Fig S2. The reviewer also has to point out that neither Diablo nor IRAK1
is considered as a ubiquitin ligase, however, the authors listed them in the data of Fig S2. The
reviewer searched the whole manuscript, and could not find any explanation why these two
genes are there.  Well, the reviewer understand this is about a method, however, you can’t prove
a method based on wrong information. The reviewer is just curious why the authors could not
find any better example to prove their method?
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Semantic clustering analysis of E3-ubiquitin ligases in gastrointestinal tract defines genes
ontology clusters with tissue expression patterns
Version: 7 Date: 20 Feb 2022
Reviewer's report:
This reviewer could not find the name of Bard1 in either Additional table 2 or Fig S2, although
BRCC3 is  indeed in Fig S2. The reviewer also has to point out that neither Diablo nor IRAK1
is considered as a ubiquitin ligase, however, the authors listed them in the data of Fig S2. The
reviewer searched the whole manuscript, and could not find any explanation why these two
genes are there.  Well, the reviewer understand this is about a method, however, you can’t prove
a method based on wrong information. The reviewer is just curious why the authors could not
find any better example to prove their method?
assistant