Title: Relation between triglycerides and the severity of acute pancreatitis combined with
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a retrospective study
Version: 4 Date: 06 Sep 2023
Reviewer's report:
PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: -Author perform most of the requested comments
Author: checked the clinical data in table 1 and made the requested changes in the manuscript
- Also they have added the relevant reference as suggested by reviewer
- authors responded adequately to each of the concerns we raised in our comments
-Author have done study design, important goal to relate AP with NAFLD and TG.
- the experiments and analyses performed with technical rigor to allow confidence in the results
- Methods , results and interpretation/discussion of the data reasonable for the study
-Collect Clinical features of the different groups, select patient process.
-Compare the different markers related to the study.
- Revised manuscript become appropriate for publication and we recommend the work for
publication
Title: Relation between triglycerides and the severity of acute pancreatitis combined with
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a retrospective study
Version: 4 Date: 06 Sep 2023
Reviewer's report:
PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: -Author perform most of the requested comments
Author: checked the clinical data in table 1 and made the requested changes in the manuscript
- Also they have added the relevant reference as suggested by reviewer
- authors responded adequately to each of the concerns we raised in our comments
-Author have done study design, important goal to relate AP with NAFLD and TG.
- the experiments and analyses performed with technical rigor to allow confidence in the results
- Methods , results and interpretation/discussion of the data reasonable for the study
-Collect Clinical features of the different groups, select patient process.
-Compare the different markers related to the study.
- Revised manuscript become appropriate for publication and we recommend the work for
publication
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Relation between triglycerides and the severity of acute pancreatitis combined with
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a retrospective study
Version: 4 Date: 06 Sep 2023
Reviewer's report:
PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: -Author perform most of the requested comments
Author: checked the clinical data in table 1 and made the requested changes in the manuscript
- Also they have added the relevant reference as suggested by reviewer
- authors responded adequately to each of the concerns we raised in our comments
-Author have done study design, important goal to relate AP with NAFLD and TG.
- the experiments and analyses performed with technical rigor to allow confidence in the results
- Methods , results and interpretation/discussion of the data reasonable for the study
-Collect Clinical features of the different groups, select patient process.
-Compare the different markers related to the study.
- Revised manuscript become appropriate for publication and we recommend the work for
publication
assistant