Title: PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE AMONG DYSPEPTIC PATIENTS AT ENDOSCOPY
UNIT, UNIVERSITY OF GONDAR HOSPITAL, NORTH WEST ETHIOPIA
Version: 1 Date: 10 Jan 2022
Reviewer's report:
General comments
The paper is technically and statistical analysis of the data sounds good and the claims are fully
supported by the experimental data. The claims are fully supported by the experimental data and
the availability of data adheres to the expected standards of our research community. Also the
claims appropriately discussed in the context of previous literature. However, the author needs
to address the following comments to make the manuscript potentially suitable for publication.
1. The headings and sub headings font sizes are similar with body/ paragraphs, the author should
format the manuscript properly
2. The name of bacterial species is not written in proper way, the author must italicize the name
of bacteria throughout the document.
3. In the method section, how did you assured the quality of your data including laboratory data?
Title: PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE AMONG DYSPEPTIC PATIENTS AT ENDOSCOPY
UNIT, UNIVERSITY OF GONDAR HOSPITAL, NORTH WEST ETHIOPIA
Version: 1 Date: 10 Jan 2022
Reviewer's report:
General comments
The paper is technically and statistical analysis of the data sounds good and the claims are fully
supported by the experimental data. The claims are fully supported by the experimental data and
the availability of data adheres to the expected standards of our research community. Also the
claims appropriately discussed in the context of previous literature. However, the author needs
to address the following comments to make the manuscript potentially suitable for publication.
1. The headings and sub headings font sizes are similar with body/ paragraphs, the author should
format the manuscript properly
2. The name of bacterial species is not written in proper way, the author must italicize the name
of bacteria throughout the document.
3. In the method section, how did you assured the quality of your data including laboratory data?
Please review this paper.
user
Title: PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE AMONG DYSPEPTIC PATIENTS AT ENDOSCOPY
UNIT, UNIVERSITY OF GONDAR HOSPITAL, NORTH WEST ETHIOPIA
Version: 1 Date: 10 Jan 2022
Reviewer's report:
General comments
The paper is technically and statistical analysis of the data sounds good and the claims are fully
supported by the experimental data. The claims are fully supported by the experimental data and
the availability of data adheres to the expected standards of our research community. Also the
claims appropriately discussed in the context of previous literature. However, the author needs
to address the following comments to make the manuscript potentially suitable for publication.
1. The headings and sub headings font sizes are similar with body/ paragraphs, the author should
format the manuscript properly
2. The name of bacterial species is not written in proper way, the author must italicize the name
of bacteria throughout the document.
3. In the method section, how did you assured the quality of your data including laboratory data?
assistant