Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: Portal hypertension as a result of the incomplete surgically treated advanced alveolar  
echinococcosis: a case description  
 
Version: 1 Date: 01 Apr 2020  
 
Reviewer: Giovanni B Levi Sandri  
 
Reviewer's report:  
 
It is an interesting case, I would suggest authors to improve the case presentation adding into 
the discussion the role of minimally invasive surgery.  
The laparoscopic and robotic approach is nowadays in most of HPB center a routine strategy 
for benign disease.  
 
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Mar 1;60(5):825. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu909.  
Laparosc Surg 2018;2:66.  doi: 10.21037/ls.2018.11.05  
Laparosc Surg 2020 doi: 10.21037/ls.2020.03.06  
Laparosc Surg 2020 4:4  doi: 10.21037/ls.2019.11.01  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comm ents to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Unable to assess  
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please exp lain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manus cript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please speci fy what aspects require further 
assess ment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Acceptable  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, f ees, funding, or salary from 
an organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publi cation of 
this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation t hat may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
3. Do you hold or are you curr ently applying for any patents  relating to the content of 
the manuscript?  
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or s alary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
5. Do you have any  other financial competing interests?  
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have  no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understan d that my name will be 
included on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my 
named repo rt including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the 
authors' responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative 
Commons CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understan d that 
any comments which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be in cluded as 
confidential comments to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: Portal hypertension as a result of the incomplete surgically treated advanced alveolar  
echinococcosis: a case description  
 
Version: 1 Date: 01 Apr 2020  
 
Reviewer: Giovanni B Levi Sandri  
 
Reviewer's report:  
 
It is an interesting case, I would suggest authors to improve the case presentation adding into 
the discussion the role of minimally invasive surgery.  
The laparoscopic and robotic approach is nowadays in most of HPB center a routine strategy 
for benign disease.  
 
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Mar 1;60(5):825. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu909.  
Laparosc Surg 2018;2:66.  doi: 10.21037/ls.2018.11.05  
Laparosc Surg 2020 doi: 10.21037/ls.2020.03.06  
Laparosc Surg 2020 4:4  doi: 10.21037/ls.2019.11.01  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comm ents to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Unable to assess  
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please exp lain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manus cript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please speci fy what aspects require further 
assess ment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Acceptable  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, f ees, funding, or salary from 
an organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publi cation of 
this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation t hat may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
3. Do you hold or are you curr ently applying for any patents  relating to the content of 
the manuscript?  
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or s alary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
5. Do you have any  other financial competing interests?  
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have  no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understan d that my name will be 
included on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my 
named repo rt including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the 
authors' responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative 
Commons CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understan d that 
any comments which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be in cluded as 
confidential comments to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: Portal hypertension as a result of the incomplete surgically treated advanced alveolar  
echinococcosis: a case description  
 
Version: 1 Date: 01 Apr 2020  
 
Reviewer: Giovanni B Levi Sandri  
 
Reviewer's report:  
 
It is an interesting case, I would suggest authors to improve the case presentation adding into 
the discussion the role of minimally invasive surgery.  
The laparoscopic and robotic approach is nowadays in most of HPB center a routine strategy 
for benign disease.  
 
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Mar 1;60(5):825. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu909.  
Laparosc Surg 2018;2:66.  doi: 10.21037/ls.2018.11.05  
Laparosc Surg 2020 doi: 10.21037/ls.2020.03.06  
Laparosc Surg 2020 4:4  doi: 10.21037/ls.2019.11.01  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comm ents to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Unable to assess  
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please exp lain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manus cript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please speci fy what aspects require further 
assess ment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Acceptable  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, f ees, funding, or salary from 
an organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publi cation of 
this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation t hat may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
3. Do you hold or are you curr ently applying for any patents  relating to the content of 
the manuscript?  
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or s alary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
5. Do you have any  other financial competing interests?  
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have  no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understan d that my name will be 
included on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my 
named repo rt including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the 
authors' responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative 
Commons CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understan d that 
any comments which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be in cluded as 
confidential comments to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal  
assistant