Reviewer's report
Title:High Success Rate of Repeat Colonoscopy with Standard Endoscopes in
Patients Referred for Prior Incomplete Colonoscopy
Version: 2Date:13 August 2013
Reviewer: Akira Horiuchi
Reviewer's report:
This study is retrospective. A better method would have been to use the same
colonoscopy on 1/2 and a different one on 12 with randomization. Without
randomization and only one endoscopist, the study may just be a measure of
his/her skill and say nothing about what is the best approach. This study does not
seem to have any new findings in incomplete colonoscopy.
Level of interest: An article of insufficient interest to warrant publication in a
scientific/medical journal
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
Reviewer's report
Title:High Success Rate of Repeat Colonoscopy with Standard Endoscopes in
Patients Referred for Prior Incomplete Colonoscopy
Version: 2Date:13 August 2013
Reviewer: Akira Horiuchi
Reviewer's report:
This study is retrospective. A better method would have been to use the same
colonoscopy on 1/2 and a different one on 12 with randomization. Without
randomization and only one endoscopist, the study may just be a measure of
his/her skill and say nothing about what is the best approach. This study does not
seem to have any new findings in incomplete colonoscopy.
Level of interest: An article of insufficient interest to warrant publication in a
scientific/medical journal
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:High Success Rate of Repeat Colonoscopy with Standard Endoscopes in
Patients Referred for Prior Incomplete Colonoscopy
Version: 2Date:13 August 2013
Reviewer: Akira Horiuchi
Reviewer's report:
This study is retrospective. A better method would have been to use the same
colonoscopy on 1/2 and a different one on 12 with randomization. Without
randomization and only one endoscopist, the study may just be a measure of
his/her skill and say nothing about what is the best approach. This study does not
seem to have any new findings in incomplete colonoscopy.
Level of interest: An article of insufficient interest to warrant publication in a
scientific/medical journal
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: Yes, but I do not feel adequately qualified to assess the
statistics.
assistant