Title: Incidence and risk factors of nasogastric feeding intolerance in moderately-severe to
severe acute pancreatitis
Version: 2 Date: 02 Jun 2022
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor,
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review the revised version of the manuscript entitled
"Incidence and risk factors of nasogastric feeding intolerance in moderately-severe to severe
acute pancreatitis" for your prestigious journal.
I would lie to commit the authors for their efforts to adequately address reviewers' commets.
More precisely, additional analysis has been performed, lacking definitions have been provided
and important limitations have been highlight in the discussion as requested.
In my opinion the manuscript can be considered eligible for acceptance.
Thank you
Title: Incidence and risk factors of nasogastric feeding intolerance in moderately-severe to
severe acute pancreatitis
Version: 2 Date: 02 Jun 2022
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor,
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review the revised version of the manuscript entitled
"Incidence and risk factors of nasogastric feeding intolerance in moderately-severe to severe
acute pancreatitis" for your prestigious journal.
I would lie to commit the authors for their efforts to adequately address reviewers' commets.
More precisely, additional analysis has been performed, lacking definitions have been provided
and important limitations have been highlight in the discussion as requested.
In my opinion the manuscript can be considered eligible for acceptance.
Thank you
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Incidence and risk factors of nasogastric feeding intolerance in moderately-severe to
severe acute pancreatitis
Version: 2 Date: 02 Jun 2022
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor,
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review the revised version of the manuscript entitled
"Incidence and risk factors of nasogastric feeding intolerance in moderately-severe to severe
acute pancreatitis" for your prestigious journal.
I would lie to commit the authors for their efforts to adequately address reviewers' commets.
More precisely, additional analysis has been performed, lacking definitions have been provided
and important limitations have been highlight in the discussion as requested.
In my opinion the manuscript can be considered eligible for acceptance.
Thank you
assistant