Title: Optimal Endoscopy Timing in Elderly Patients Presenting with Acute Non-Variceal
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Version: 2 Date: 18 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
Well done study on an important topic; some clarifications are needed:
Materials and methods:  on the technique used for hemostasis; the different types doesn not
obtain the same results (for instance adrenaline injection)
In the results
there is a percentage of patients  (4.3%) where bleeding lesions were not visualized (what were
their destiny???)
Also when the authors describe clinical outcomes  and the need of sugical /radiological
interventions ii is not specified how the bleeding was severe and how clinical confditions were
compromised
Bibliography should be completed adding the papers recently published on this topic from the
group of Marmo R that agree with the conclusions of this study but reported the results of a big
group of patients enrolled prospectively
Title: Optimal Endoscopy Timing in Elderly Patients Presenting with Acute Non-Variceal
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Version: 2 Date: 18 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
Well done study on an important topic; some clarifications are needed:
Materials and methods:  on the technique used for hemostasis; the different types doesn not
obtain the same results (for instance adrenaline injection)
In the results
there is a percentage of patients  (4.3%) where bleeding lesions were not visualized (what were
their destiny???)
Also when the authors describe clinical outcomes  and the need of sugical /radiological
interventions ii is not specified how the bleeding was severe and how clinical confditions were
compromised
Bibliography should be completed adding the papers recently published on this topic from the
group of Marmo R that agree with the conclusions of this study but reported the results of a big
group of patients enrolled prospectively
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Optimal Endoscopy Timing in Elderly Patients Presenting with Acute Non-Variceal
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Version: 2 Date: 18 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
Well done study on an important topic; some clarifications are needed:
Materials and methods:  on the technique used for hemostasis; the different types doesn not
obtain the same results (for instance adrenaline injection)
In the results
there is a percentage of patients  (4.3%) where bleeding lesions were not visualized (what were
their destiny???)
Also when the authors describe clinical outcomes  and the need of sugical /radiological
interventions ii is not specified how the bleeding was severe and how clinical confditions were
compromised
Bibliography should be completed adding the papers recently published on this topic from the
group of Marmo R that agree with the conclusions of this study but reported the results of a big
group of patients enrolled prospectively
assistant