Reviewer's report
Title:Determinants of female sexual function in inflammatory bowel disease. A
survey based cross-sectional analysis
Version: 1Date:18 January 2008
Reviewer: Sunanda Kane
Reviewer's report:
Reviewer's report
-----------------
Please number your comments and divide them into
- Major Compulsory Revisions
Was adjustment done for multiple variables? You had 336 patients and
what appears to be 13 variables.
There were 19 questionnaires from the outpatient department, what was
your denominator?
P values are needed in Table 1 and Table 2
In the Questionnaire section, it say that they were identical for "the
two groups". Please clarify what you are referring to.
- Minor Essential Revisions
In the Introduction, the last sentence starts with "These". It is
unclear what you are referring to, is it mood disorders, or IBD?
EORTC should be spelled out the first time you use the abbreviation and
not simply include it in a list of abbreviations.
There is a typographical error in the last sentence of the abstract.
There is a typographical error in the first sentence of the second
paragraph on page 6 "reveiled"
What next?
----------
Based on your assessment of the validity of the manuscript, what do you
advise should be the next step?
- Accept after minor essential revisions (which the authors can be
trusted to make)
Level of interest
-----------------
BMC Gastroenterology has a policy of publishing all scientifically sound
research whatever its level of interest. However if you choose one of
the first three categories below, we may ask the authors if they would
like the manuscript considered instead for the more selective journal
BMC Medicine.
- An article whose findings are important to those with closely related
research interests
Quality of written English
--------------------------
As we do not charge for access to published research, we cannot
undertake the costs of editing. If the language is a serious impediment
to understanding, you should choose the first option below, and we will
ask the authors to seek help. If the language is generally acceptable
but has specific problems, some or all of which you have noted, choose
the second option.
- Needs some language corrections before being published
Statistical review
------------------
Is it essential that this manuscript be seen by an expert statistician?
If you feel that the manuscript needs to be seen by a statistician, but
are unable to assess it yourself then please could you suggest
alternative experts in your confidential comments to the editors.
- No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests
----------------------------------
We ask all peer reviewers of medical papers to declare their competing
interests in relation to the paper they are reviewing. The peer reviewer
declaration is included in the report bearing your name that will be
sent to the authors, and published on our website if the article is
accepted.
In the context of peer review, a competing interest exists when your
interpretation of data or presentation of information may be influenced
by your personal or financial relationship with other people or
organizations. Reviewers should disclose any financial competing
interests but also any non-financial competing interests that may cause
them embarrassment were they to become public after the publication of
the manuscript.
When completing your declaration, please consider the following
questions:
- Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees,
funding, or salary from an organisation that may in any way gain or lose
financially from the publication of this paper, either now or in the
future?
- Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any
way gain or lose financially from the publication of this paper, either
now or in the future?
- Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to
the content of the manuscript? Have you received reimbursements, fees,
funding, or salary from an organization that holds or has applied for
patents relating to the content of the manuscript?
- Do you have any other financial competing interests?
- Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this
paper?
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have
no competing interests' below. If your reply is yes to any, please give
details below.
I have no competing interests
Reviewer's report
Title:Determinants of female sexual function in inflammatory bowel disease. A
survey based cross-sectional analysis
Version: 1Date:18 January 2008
Reviewer: Sunanda Kane
Reviewer's report:
Reviewer's report
-----------------
Please number your comments and divide them into
- Major Compulsory Revisions
Was adjustment done for multiple variables? You had 336 patients and
what appears to be 13 variables.
There were 19 questionnaires from the outpatient department, what was
your denominator?
P values are needed in Table 1 and Table 2
In the Questionnaire section, it say that they were identical for "the
two groups". Please clarify what you are referring to.
- Minor Essential Revisions
In the Introduction, the last sentence starts with "These". It is
unclear what you are referring to, is it mood disorders, or IBD?
EORTC should be spelled out the first time you use the abbreviation and
not simply include it in a list of abbreviations.
There is a typographical error in the last sentence of the abstract.
There is a typographical error in the first sentence of the second
paragraph on page 6 "reveiled"
What next?
----------
Based on your assessment of the validity of the manuscript, what do you
advise should be the next step?
- Accept after minor essential revisions (which the authors can be
trusted to make)
Level of interest
-----------------
BMC Gastroenterology has a policy of publishing all scientifically sound
research whatever its level of interest. However if you choose one of
the first three categories below, we may ask the authors if they would
like the manuscript considered instead for the more selective journal
BMC Medicine.
- An article whose findings are important to those with closely related
research interests
Quality of written English
--------------------------
As we do not charge for access to published research, we cannot
undertake the costs of editing. If the language is a serious impediment
to understanding, you should choose the first option below, and we will
ask the authors to seek help. If the language is generally acceptable
but has specific problems, some or all of which you have noted, choose
the second option.
- Needs some language corrections before being published
Statistical review
------------------
Is it essential that this manuscript be seen by an expert statistician?
If you feel that the manuscript needs to be seen by a statistician, but
are unable to assess it yourself then please could you suggest
alternative experts in your confidential comments to the editors.
- No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests
----------------------------------
We ask all peer reviewers of medical papers to declare their competing
interests in relation to the paper they are reviewing. The peer reviewer
declaration is included in the report bearing your name that will be
sent to the authors, and published on our website if the article is
accepted.
In the context of peer review, a competing interest exists when your
interpretation of data or presentation of information may be influenced
by your personal or financial relationship with other people or
organizations. Reviewers should disclose any financial competing
interests but also any non-financial competing interests that may cause
them embarrassment were they to become public after the publication of
the manuscript.
When completing your declaration, please consider the following
questions:
- Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees,
funding, or salary from an organisation that may in any way gain or lose
financially from the publication of this paper, either now or in the
future?
- Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any
way gain or lose financially from the publication of this paper, either
now or in the future?
- Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to
the content of the manuscript? Have you received reimbursements, fees,
funding, or salary from an organization that holds or has applied for
patents relating to the content of the manuscript?
- Do you have any other financial competing interests?
- Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this
paper?
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have
no competing interests' below. If your reply is yes to any, please give
details below.
I have no competing interests
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Determinants of female sexual function in inflammatory bowel disease. A
survey based cross-sectional analysis
Version: 1Date:18 January 2008
Reviewer: Sunanda Kane
Reviewer's report:
Reviewer's report
-----------------
Please number your comments and divide them into
- Major Compulsory Revisions
Was adjustment done for multiple variables? You had 336 patients and
what appears to be 13 variables.
There were 19 questionnaires from the outpatient department, what was
your denominator?
P values are needed in Table 1 and Table 2
In the Questionnaire section, it say that they were identical for "the
two groups". Please clarify what you are referring to.
- Minor Essential Revisions
In the Introduction, the last sentence starts with "These". It is
unclear what you are referring to, is it mood disorders, or IBD?
EORTC should be spelled out the first time you use the abbreviation and
not simply include it in a list of abbreviations.
There is a typographical error in the last sentence of the abstract.
There is a typographical error in the first sentence of the second
paragraph on page 6 "reveiled"
What next?
----------
Based on your assessment of the validity of the manuscript, what do you
advise should be the next step?
- Accept after minor essential revisions (which the authors can be
trusted to make)
Level of interest
-----------------
BMC Gastroenterology has a policy of publishing all scientifically sound
research whatever its level of interest. However if you choose one of
the first three categories below, we may ask the authors if they would
like the manuscript considered instead for the more selective journal
BMC Medicine.
- An article whose findings are important to those with closely related
research interests
Quality of written English
--------------------------
As we do not charge for access to published research, we cannot
undertake the costs of editing. If the language is a serious impediment
to understanding, you should choose the first option below, and we will
ask the authors to seek help. If the language is generally acceptable
but has specific problems, some or all of which you have noted, choose
the second option.
- Needs some language corrections before being published
Statistical review
------------------
Is it essential that this manuscript be seen by an expert statistician?
If you feel that the manuscript needs to be seen by a statistician, but
are unable to assess it yourself then please could you suggest
alternative experts in your confidential comments to the editors.
- No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests
----------------------------------
We ask all peer reviewers of medical papers to declare their competing
interests in relation to the paper they are reviewing. The peer reviewer
declaration is included in the report bearing your name that will be
sent to the authors, and published on our website if the article is
accepted.
In the context of peer review, a competing interest exists when your
interpretation of data or presentation of information may be influenced
by your personal or financial relationship with other people or
organizations. Reviewers should disclose any financial competing
interests but also any non-financial competing interests that may cause
them embarrassment were they to become public after the publication of
the manuscript.
When completing your declaration, please consider the following
questions:
- Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees,
funding, or salary from an organisation that may in any way gain or lose
financially from the publication of this paper, either now or in the
future?
- Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any
way gain or lose financially from the publication of this paper, either
now or in the future?
- Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to
the content of the manuscript? Have you received reimbursements, fees,
funding, or salary from an organization that holds or has applied for
patents relating to the content of the manuscript?
- Do you have any other financial competing interests?
- Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this
paper?
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have
no competing interests' below. If your reply is yes to any, please give
details below.
I have no competing interests
assistant