Reviewer's report
Title:Evaluation of ES-derived neural progenitors as a potential source for cell
replacement therapy in the gut.
Version: 4Date:27 July 2011
Reviewer: maria giuliana Giuliana vannucchi
Reviewer's report:
The paper maintains its potential interesting although the in vivo procedure is
spoilt by the stem cell chosen. The authors have made several changes in the
writing in regard to the content, also added some few experiments, the quality of
the images, after the authors have made order on them, is good. Finally the
authors have adjusted the discussion avoiding too much speculation.
Hopefully, as soon as the authors will get much money and personnel, they
continue their research with the aim to follow the suggestions that I (and likely the
other referees) recommended (such as to investigate their cells in different
experimental conditions under the TEM, eventually asking for collaborations).
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
Reviewer's report
Title:Evaluation of ES-derived neural progenitors as a potential source for cell
replacement therapy in the gut.
Version: 4Date:27 July 2011
Reviewer: maria giuliana Giuliana vannucchi
Reviewer's report:
The paper maintains its potential interesting although the in vivo procedure is
spoilt by the stem cell chosen. The authors have made several changes in the
writing in regard to the content, also added some few experiments, the quality of
the images, after the authors have made order on them, is good. Finally the
authors have adjusted the discussion avoiding too much speculation.
Hopefully, as soon as the authors will get much money and personnel, they
continue their research with the aim to follow the suggestions that I (and likely the
other referees) recommended (such as to investigate their cells in different
experimental conditions under the TEM, eventually asking for collaborations).
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Evaluation of ES-derived neural progenitors as a potential source for cell
replacement therapy in the gut.
Version: 4Date:27 July 2011
Reviewer: maria giuliana Giuliana vannucchi
Reviewer's report:
The paper maintains its potential interesting although the in vivo procedure is
spoilt by the stem cell chosen. The authors have made several changes in the
writing in regard to the content, also added some few experiments, the quality of
the images, after the authors have made order on them, is good. Finally the
authors have adjusted the discussion avoiding too much speculation.
Hopefully, as soon as the authors will get much money and personnel, they
continue their research with the aim to follow the suggestions that I (and likely the
other referees) recommended (such as to investigate their cells in different
experimental conditions under the TEM, eventually asking for collaborations).
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Acceptable
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
assistant