Title: Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after
neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy
Version: 3 Date: 02 Sep 2024
Reviewer's report:
1)
Page 9, line 29
[12] [13] – These references are not about surgery after NICT.
2)
Page 9, line 32 ~ Page 10, line 11
This paragraph discusses two distinct topics: the optimal cut-off value for LNR and the outcomes
related to (NCIT, but it lacks clarity and organization. It would be better to either reorganize the
content to make the ideas clearer or split it into two separate paragraphs, each with a unified
focus. Additionally, since the content is primarily focused on LNR in esophageal cancer, it
would be better to modify or add information related to gastric cancer to make the discussion
more relevant to that context (e.g., previous studies on determining the optimal cut-off for LNR
in gastric cancer).
Title: Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after
neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy
Version: 3 Date: 02 Sep 2024
Reviewer's report:
1)
Page 9, line 29
[12] [13] – These references are not about surgery after NICT.
2)
Page 9, line 32 ~ Page 10, line 11
This paragraph discusses two distinct topics: the optimal cut-off value for LNR and the outcomes
related to (NCIT, but it lacks clarity and organization. It would be better to either reorganize the
content to make the ideas clearer or split it into two separate paragraphs, each with a unified
focus. Additionally, since the content is primarily focused on LNR in esophageal cancer, it
would be better to modify or add information related to gastric cancer to make the discussion
more relevant to that context (e.g., previous studies on determining the optimal cut-off for LNR
in gastric cancer).
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after
neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy
Version: 3 Date: 02 Sep 2024
Reviewer's report:
1)
Page 9, line 29
[12] [13] – These references are not about surgery after NICT.
2)
Page 9, line 32 ~ Page 10, line 11
This paragraph discusses two distinct topics: the optimal cut-off value for LNR and the outcomes
related to (NCIT, but it lacks clarity and organization. It would be better to either reorganize the
content to make the ideas clearer or split it into two separate paragraphs, each with a unified
focus. Additionally, since the content is primarily focused on LNR in esophageal cancer, it
would be better to modify or add information related to gastric cancer to make the discussion
more relevant to that context (e.g., previous studies on determining the optimal cut-off for LNR
in gastric cancer).
assistant