Title: Endoscopic ultrasonography guided cutting scar of esophageal stricture after endoscopic
injection sclerotherapy
Version: 2 Date: 06 Jul 2022
Reviewer's report:
The authors answered my queries point-by-point manner. However, further clarification and
elaboration are necessary for publication. I raised the following queries.
1) In the discussion, the authors wrote, ‘the scar tissue is thicker than the normal mucosa, and
the location and depth of the scar can be measured exactly.’ This information should be moved
to the introduction.
2) What was the hypothesis of this study? Why did the authors want to investigate the efficacy
and safety of EUS for cutting the esophageal scar after EUS?
3) In the first paragraph of the discussion, the authors wrote the mechanism of esophageal scar
after EIS. However, this is not the main point of this study. Please elaborate on the overall
structure of the manuscript.
4) The authors added Figure 4. Is this the same case as Figure 3?
5) The authors used both ‘esophageal’ and ‘oesophageal.’ Please use either of them.
Title: Endoscopic ultrasonography guided cutting scar of esophageal stricture after endoscopic
injection sclerotherapy
Version: 2 Date: 06 Jul 2022
Reviewer's report:
The authors answered my queries point-by-point manner. However, further clarification and
elaboration are necessary for publication. I raised the following queries.
1) In the discussion, the authors wrote, ‘the scar tissue is thicker than the normal mucosa, and
the location and depth of the scar can be measured exactly.’ This information should be moved
to the introduction.
2) What was the hypothesis of this study? Why did the authors want to investigate the efficacy
and safety of EUS for cutting the esophageal scar after EUS?
3) In the first paragraph of the discussion, the authors wrote the mechanism of esophageal scar
after EIS. However, this is not the main point of this study. Please elaborate on the overall
structure of the manuscript.
4) The authors added Figure 4. Is this the same case as Figure 3?
5) The authors used both ‘esophageal’ and ‘oesophageal.’ Please use either of them.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Endoscopic ultrasonography guided cutting scar of esophageal stricture after endoscopic
injection sclerotherapy
Version: 2 Date: 06 Jul 2022
Reviewer's report:
The authors answered my queries point-by-point manner. However, further clarification and
elaboration are necessary for publication. I raised the following queries.
1) In the discussion, the authors wrote, ‘the scar tissue is thicker than the normal mucosa, and
the location and depth of the scar can be measured exactly.’ This information should be moved
to the introduction.
2) What was the hypothesis of this study? Why did the authors want to investigate the efficacy
and safety of EUS for cutting the esophageal scar after EUS?
3) In the first paragraph of the discussion, the authors wrote the mechanism of esophageal scar
after EIS. However, this is not the main point of this study. Please elaborate on the overall
structure of the manuscript.
4) The authors added Figure 4. Is this the same case as Figure 3?
5) The authors used both ‘esophageal’ and ‘oesophageal.’ Please use either of them.
assistant