Reviewer's report
Title:Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small
bowel angioectasia
Version:1Date:17 June 2014
Reviewer: Tibor Wittmann
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor!
The papar of Eiji Sand collaborators has a real clinical interest.
Beside this fact several question remain to clear up.
These are: wheter an overnight fasting was enough for obtaining clear pictures
from the whole small bowel? How the author may explain the bleeding detection
rate, not higher then 42,6%. 22 patient were enrolled in the goup receiving
endoscopis treatment, but 46 patints received not,and why ?In patient with
rebleeding the rate of haematocaesia or melena was high. It requires more data
and explanation. Eg . : how was the correlation between the bleeding location
detected durind the first investigation with CE and during the rebeeding ?
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
l declare that l have no competing interests' below.
Reviewer's report
Title:Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small
bowel angioectasia
Version:1Date:17 June 2014
Reviewer: Tibor Wittmann
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor!
The papar of Eiji Sand collaborators has a real clinical interest.
Beside this fact several question remain to clear up.
These are: wheter an overnight fasting was enough for obtaining clear pictures
from the whole small bowel? How the author may explain the bleeding detection
rate, not higher then 42,6%. 22 patient were enrolled in the goup receiving
endoscopis treatment, but 46 patints received not,and why ?In patient with
rebleeding the rate of haematocaesia or melena was high. It requires more data
and explanation. Eg . : how was the correlation between the bleeding location
detected durind the first investigation with CE and during the rebeeding ?
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
l declare that l have no competing interests' below.
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small
bowel angioectasia
Version:1Date:17 June 2014
Reviewer: Tibor Wittmann
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor!
The papar of Eiji Sand collaborators has a real clinical interest.
Beside this fact several question remain to clear up.
These are: wheter an overnight fasting was enough for obtaining clear pictures
from the whole small bowel? How the author may explain the bleeding detection
rate, not higher then 42,6%. 22 patient were enrolled in the goup receiving
endoscopis treatment, but 46 patints received not,and why ?In patient with
rebleeding the rate of haematocaesia or melena was high. It requires more data
and explanation. Eg . : how was the correlation between the bleeding location
detected durind the first investigation with CE and during the rebeeding ?
Level of interest: An article of importance in its field
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
l declare that l have no competing interests' below.
assistant