Title: Ischemia prediction score (IsPS) in patients with strangulated small bowel obstruction:
a retrospective cohort study
Version: 2 Date: 26 Jan 2023
Reviewer:  Weiwei Ding
Reviewer's report:
Thanks for the invitation. I have several comments on this manuscript.
1. In the DC, one third required small bowel resection, and the other two thirds without bowel
resection. Would the authors provide more information about the etiology of SBO.
2. The definition of “Reduced wall enhancement”was not universally accepted. would the
authors provide some references?
3. In my opinion, the non-distended bowels need to be resected, instead of the dilated bowels.
The “transition zone” that indicates the passage between compressed and decompressed small
bowel may be our most concerns. Would the authors comment on this?
4. The CT findings of Ascites maybe quite different. Bloody or non-bloody ascites? This may
be contribute to the surgical outcome and pre-operative decisions.
Title: Ischemia prediction score (IsPS) in patients with strangulated small bowel obstruction:
a retrospective cohort study
Version: 2 Date: 26 Jan 2023
Reviewer:  Weiwei Ding
Reviewer's report:
Thanks for the invitation. I have several comments on this manuscript.
1. In the DC, one third required small bowel resection, and the other two thirds without bowel
resection. Would the authors provide more information about the etiology of SBO.
2. The definition of “Reduced wall enhancement”was not universally accepted. would the
authors provide some references?
3. In my opinion, the non-distended bowels need to be resected, instead of the dilated bowels.
The “transition zone” that indicates the passage between compressed and decompressed small
bowel may be our most concerns. Would the authors comment on this?
4. The CT findings of Ascites maybe quite different. Bloody or non-bloody ascites? This may
be contribute to the surgical outcome and pre-operative decisions.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Ischemia prediction score (IsPS) in patients with strangulated small bowel obstruction:
a retrospective cohort study
Version: 2 Date: 26 Jan 2023
Reviewer:  Weiwei Ding
Reviewer's report:
Thanks for the invitation. I have several comments on this manuscript.
1. In the DC, one third required small bowel resection, and the other two thirds without bowel
resection. Would the authors provide more information about the etiology of SBO.
2. The definition of “Reduced wall enhancement”was not universally accepted. would the
authors provide some references?
3. In my opinion, the non-distended bowels need to be resected, instead of the dilated bowels.
The “transition zone” that indicates the passage between compressed and decompressed small
bowel may be our most concerns. Would the authors comment on this?
4. The CT findings of Ascites maybe quite different. Bloody or non-bloody ascites? This may
be contribute to the surgical outcome and pre-operative decisions.
assistant