Title: Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Celiac Disease in Northeast Iran: A Regional
Retrospective Cohort Study
Version: 6 Date: 05 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
The manuscript has improved with the authors revision and is much clearer and more put into
context with the scientific literature on the subject.
There is still grammar and language concerns. I have included suggestions for improving the
abstract, please find file attached as a suggestion. But please go through the manuscript again
for language/wording editing.
There is still a confusion about Figure 1, not enough information is given, and the number does
not add up in the boxes. For ex, there is no information on the matching and the number of
pregnancies in the CD women and exclusions is not adding up. The answer provided by the
authors in the response to reviewers clarifies the matter, but the manuscript would also need
clarification in a structured manner.
The first part of the results section regards the selection process and is a part of methods. Please
remove.
In the results section, refrain from using the wording "significant association", instead use "was
not associated with" or "was associated with".  And in the Discussion, do not include OR's and
p values.
Title: Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Celiac Disease in Northeast Iran: A Regional
Retrospective Cohort Study
Version: 6 Date: 05 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
The manuscript has improved with the authors revision and is much clearer and more put into
context with the scientific literature on the subject.
There is still grammar and language concerns. I have included suggestions for improving the
abstract, please find file attached as a suggestion. But please go through the manuscript again
for language/wording editing.
There is still a confusion about Figure 1, not enough information is given, and the number does
not add up in the boxes. For ex, there is no information on the matching and the number of
pregnancies in the CD women and exclusions is not adding up. The answer provided by the
authors in the response to reviewers clarifies the matter, but the manuscript would also need
clarification in a structured manner.
The first part of the results section regards the selection process and is a part of methods. Please
remove.
In the results section, refrain from using the wording "significant association", instead use "was
not associated with" or "was associated with".  And in the Discussion, do not include OR's and
p values.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Celiac Disease in Northeast Iran: A Regional
Retrospective Cohort Study
Version: 6 Date: 05 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
The manuscript has improved with the authors revision and is much clearer and more put into
context with the scientific literature on the subject.
There is still grammar and language concerns. I have included suggestions for improving the
abstract, please find file attached as a suggestion. But please go through the manuscript again
for language/wording editing.
There is still a confusion about Figure 1, not enough information is given, and the number does
not add up in the boxes. For ex, there is no information on the matching and the number of
pregnancies in the CD women and exclusions is not adding up. The answer provided by the
authors in the response to reviewers clarifies the matter, but the manuscript would also need
clarification in a structured manner.
The first part of the results section regards the selection process and is a part of methods. Please
remove.
In the results section, refrain from using the wording "significant association", instead use "was
not associated with" or "was associated with".  And in the Discussion, do not include OR's and
p values.
assistant