Reviewer's report
Title:Comfort, safety and quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after 2
hours fasting: a randomized controlled trial
Version: 1Date:7 July 2013
Reviewer: mandana rafeey
Reviewer's report:
the question posed by the authors was well defined.
the methods are appropriate but didnot well described.
what about standard meal that given to all patients before endoscopy.
The outcome variables can be added were: endoscopic
visibility, pH of gastric content, the number of patients with fluid in the gastric
fundus.
The manuscript adhere to the relevant standards for reporting .
The discussion must be shorter .
The writing was acceptable
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
NO
Reviewer's report
Title:Comfort, safety and quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after 2
hours fasting: a randomized controlled trial
Version: 1Date:7 July 2013
Reviewer: mandana rafeey
Reviewer's report:
the question posed by the authors was well defined.
the methods are appropriate but didnot well described.
what about standard meal that given to all patients before endoscopy.
The outcome variables can be added were: endoscopic
visibility, pH of gastric content, the number of patients with fluid in the gastric
fundus.
The manuscript adhere to the relevant standards for reporting .
The discussion must be shorter .
The writing was acceptable
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
NO
Please review this paper.
user
Reviewer's report
Title:Comfort, safety and quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after 2
hours fasting: a randomized controlled trial
Version: 1Date:7 July 2013
Reviewer: mandana rafeey
Reviewer's report:
the question posed by the authors was well defined.
the methods are appropriate but didnot well described.
what about standard meal that given to all patients before endoscopy.
The outcome variables can be added were: endoscopic
visibility, pH of gastric content, the number of patients with fluid in the gastric
fundus.
The manuscript adhere to the relevant standards for reporting .
The discussion must be shorter .
The writing was acceptable
Level of interest: An article of limited interest
Quality of written English: Needs some language corrections before being
published
Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a
statistician.
Declaration of competing interests:
NO
assistant