Title: Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Autoantibodies, and Their Associations and liver disease
outcome, a single- center Retrospective Study heir Associations and liver disease outcome, a
single-center Retrospective Study
Version: 6 Date: 19 Jan 2025
Reviewer:  Ilkay Ergenc
Reviewer's report:
Dear Authors,
Thank you for your efforts in conducting this study and preparing the manuscript.
While the study provides additional evidence to the existing literature, it does not present any
novel findings. The manuscript is overly lengthy, which affects its clarity and impact. I would
recommend the following improvements:
Title: Consider revising the title to make it shorter and more focused, highlighting the key
message of the study.
Introduction: Streamline the introduction by focusing primarily on the knowledge gap in the
literature and clearly stating what your study aims to contribute.
Results: The results section is unnecessarily long, with repetitive information presented in both
the text and tables/figures. I suggest summarizing only the key findings in the text and referring
readers to the tables/figures for additional details.
Discussion: The discussion section is overly extensive and includes a considerable amount of
literature summary that is beyond the scope of this study. I recommend focusing on interpreting
your findings in the context of the existing literature and their implications, while keeping the
discussion concise and relevant.
Thank you for your hard work, and I hope these suggestions help improve the manuscript.
Title: Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Autoantibodies, and Their Associations and liver disease
outcome, a single- center Retrospective Study heir Associations and liver disease outcome, a
single-center Retrospective Study
Version: 6 Date: 19 Jan 2025
Reviewer:  Ilkay Ergenc
Reviewer's report:
Dear Authors,
Thank you for your efforts in conducting this study and preparing the manuscript.
While the study provides additional evidence to the existing literature, it does not present any
novel findings. The manuscript is overly lengthy, which affects its clarity and impact. I would
recommend the following improvements:
Title: Consider revising the title to make it shorter and more focused, highlighting the key
message of the study.
Introduction: Streamline the introduction by focusing primarily on the knowledge gap in the
literature and clearly stating what your study aims to contribute.
Results: The results section is unnecessarily long, with repetitive information presented in both
the text and tables/figures. I suggest summarizing only the key findings in the text and referring
readers to the tables/figures for additional details.
Discussion: The discussion section is overly extensive and includes a considerable amount of
literature summary that is beyond the scope of this study. I recommend focusing on interpreting
your findings in the context of the existing literature and their implications, while keeping the
discussion concise and relevant.
Thank you for your hard work, and I hope these suggestions help improve the manuscript.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Autoantibodies, and Their Associations and liver disease
outcome, a single- center Retrospective Study heir Associations and liver disease outcome, a
single-center Retrospective Study
Version: 6 Date: 19 Jan 2025
Reviewer:  Ilkay Ergenc
Reviewer's report:
Dear Authors,
Thank you for your efforts in conducting this study and preparing the manuscript.
While the study provides additional evidence to the existing literature, it does not present any
novel findings. The manuscript is overly lengthy, which affects its clarity and impact. I would
recommend the following improvements:
Title: Consider revising the title to make it shorter and more focused, highlighting the key
message of the study.
Introduction: Streamline the introduction by focusing primarily on the knowledge gap in the
literature and clearly stating what your study aims to contribute.
Results: The results section is unnecessarily long, with repetitive information presented in both
the text and tables/figures. I suggest summarizing only the key findings in the text and referring
readers to the tables/figures for additional details.
Discussion: The discussion section is overly extensive and includes a considerable amount of
literature summary that is beyond the scope of this study. I recommend focusing on interpreting
your findings in the context of the existing literature and their implications, while keeping the
discussion concise and relevant.
Thank you for your hard work, and I hope these suggestions help improve the manuscript.
assistant