Title: The characteristics and clinical relevance of tumor fusion burden in non-EBV (+) gastric
cancer with MSS
Version: 0 Date: 28 Jul 2022
Reviewer:  Zhixue Zheng
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for letting me review your manuscript. The manuscript makes a good effort to
analysis the relationship between tumor fusion burden and non-EBV(+) gastric cancer with MSS
by using the online database TCGA, but I do have some comments: 1) There are numerous
typos in the article which needs re-reading and improving spelling and grammar for easier to
understand; 2) Why you choose the non-EBV(+) GC patients for analysis? You should give some
reasons; 3) The vertical coordinate of Fig.2 D is inconsistent with the notes; 4) The Discussion
section needs to be carefully revised to make it more closely related to the theme.
Title: The characteristics and clinical relevance of tumor fusion burden in non-EBV (+) gastric
cancer with MSS
Version: 0 Date: 28 Jul 2022
Reviewer:  Zhixue Zheng
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for letting me review your manuscript. The manuscript makes a good effort to
analysis the relationship between tumor fusion burden and non-EBV(+) gastric cancer with MSS
by using the online database TCGA, but I do have some comments: 1) There are numerous
typos in the article which needs re-reading and improving spelling and grammar for easier to
understand; 2) Why you choose the non-EBV(+) GC patients for analysis? You should give some
reasons; 3) The vertical coordinate of Fig.2 D is inconsistent with the notes; 4) The Discussion
section needs to be carefully revised to make it more closely related to the theme.
Please review this paper.
user
Title: The characteristics and clinical relevance of tumor fusion burden in non-EBV (+) gastric
cancer with MSS
Version: 0 Date: 28 Jul 2022
Reviewer:  Zhixue Zheng
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for letting me review your manuscript. The manuscript makes a good effort to
analysis the relationship between tumor fusion burden and non-EBV(+) gastric cancer with MSS
by using the online database TCGA, but I do have some comments: 1) There are numerous
typos in the article which needs re-reading and improving spelling and grammar for easier to
understand; 2) Why you choose the non-EBV(+) GC patients for analysis? You should give some
reasons; 3) The vertical coordinate of Fig.2 D is inconsistent with the notes; 4) The Discussion
section needs to be carefully revised to make it more closely related to the theme.
assistant