Title: Daily Sodium Intake and Constipation in US Adult Males: An Uncommon Negative
Association Revealed by National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data from the
United States (2005–2010)
Version: 2 Date: 23 Nov 2024
Reviewer:  Panagiotis Tsibouris
Reviewer's report:
Abstract ORs should be provided in accordance to p-values Additionally might be better to
be replaced with on the contrary  Methods Why did authors provide bi-annial periods and not
sum up the investigation period to 2005-2010? Description of patients excluded with numerical
values belong in the results and only population characteristics belong in methods section Could
straining be exctracted from NHANES data? Could data on mood disorders ( anxiety and
depression ) be included in the analysis?  Statistics Power of the study should be calculated
Title: Daily Sodium Intake and Constipation in US Adult Males: An Uncommon Negative
Association Revealed by National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data from the
United States (2005–2010)
Version: 2 Date: 23 Nov 2024
Reviewer:  Panagiotis Tsibouris
Reviewer's report:
Abstract ORs should be provided in accordance to p-values Additionally might be better to
be replaced with on the contrary  Methods Why did authors provide bi-annial periods and not
sum up the investigation period to 2005-2010? Description of patients excluded with numerical
values belong in the results and only population characteristics belong in methods section Could
straining be exctracted from NHANES data? Could data on mood disorders ( anxiety and
depression ) be included in the analysis?  Statistics Power of the study should be calculated
Please review this paper.
user
Title: Daily Sodium Intake and Constipation in US Adult Males: An Uncommon Negative
Association Revealed by National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data from the
United States (2005–2010)
Version: 2 Date: 23 Nov 2024
Reviewer:  Panagiotis Tsibouris
Reviewer's report:
Abstract ORs should be provided in accordance to p-values Additionally might be better to
be replaced with on the contrary  Methods Why did authors provide bi-annial periods and not
sum up the investigation period to 2005-2010? Description of patients excluded with numerical
values belong in the results and only population characteristics belong in methods section Could
straining be exctracted from NHANES data? Could data on mood disorders ( anxiety and
depression ) be included in the analysis?  Statistics Power of the study should be calculated
assistant