_id
int64 2
1.77k
| generated_text
dict | score
stringclasses 4
values | reasoning
listlengths 1
4
⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|
280
|
{
"_id": 280,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the main points of the DOCUMENT. It lacks specific details about the top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads, as well as the nutritional values of the breads mentioned. The ANSWER also does not mention the glycaemic index (GI) and its implications for weight gain and Type 2 diabetes. The ANSWER's focus on 'eating less processed foods with more wholegrains' is a generalization of the DOCUMENT's message but does not convey the nuances of the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail make it seem like a condensed version of the DOCUMENT rather than a faithful summary.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER lacks specific details about the top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the glycaemic index (GI) and its implications for weight gain and Type 2 diabetes.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail make it seem like a condensed version of the DOCUMENT rather than a faithful summary.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the main points of the DOCUMENT. It lacks specific details about the top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads, as well as the nutritional values of the breads mentioned. The ANSWER also does not mention the glycaemic index (GI) and its implications for weight gain and Type 2 diabetes. The ANSWER's focus on 'eating less processed foods with more wholegrains' is a generalization of the DOCUMENT's message but does not convey the nuances of the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail make it seem like a condensed version of the DOCUMENT rather than a faithful summary.\""
] |
434
|
{
"_id": 434,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER contains information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as Eden Hazard joining Manchester United from Southampton for £28m, which is incorrect as the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw joined Manchester United for £28m.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the young English defender feels he has struggled to live up to his valuation at the club so far, when in fact the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw feels this way.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Hazard has played only 19 games for United this season, when in fact the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw has played 19 times in all competitions for United this campaign.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>Eden Hazard joining Manchester United from Southampton for £28m</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The young English defender feels he has struggled to live up to his valuation at the club so far</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Hazard has played only 19 games for United this season</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER contains information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as Eden Hazard joining Manchester United from Southampton for £28m, which is incorrect as the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw joined Manchester United for £28m.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the young English defender feels he has struggled to live up to his valuation at the club so far, when in fact the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw feels this way.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Hazard has played only 19 games for United this season, when in fact the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw has played 19 times in all competitions for United this campaign.\""
] |
39
|
{
"_id": 39,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the essence of the DOCUMENT. \n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of death, which is a crucial piece of information in the DOCUMENT.\n- The ANSWER is incorrect about Kayahan's first cancer diagnosis year, stating 2005 instead of 1990.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately states that Kayahan most recently performed in February, whereas the DOCUMENT states he performed on Valentine's Day.\n- The ANSWER only highlights Kayahan's contributions to pop music, whereas the DOCUMENT also mentions his accomplishments as a songwriter and guitarist.\n- The ANSWER fails to mention Kayahan's full name, birthdate, and other key biographical details.\n- The ANSWER does not contain any information about the reaction of Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu to Kayahan's death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's love songs or his album 'I Made a Vow' as being his most popular.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's final album release year.\n- The ANSWER does not mention other artists recording his material throughout his career.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's physical condition and how it changed over time.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's Eurovision Song Contest participation.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthplace or where he grew up.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's prime ministerial reaction to his death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's death cause.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's cancer return years.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's guitar accompaniment.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's vocal quality.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his final album release.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his cancer diagnosis.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's cancer diagnosis year.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthday.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthdate.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER is incorrect about Kayahan's first cancer diagnosis year, stating 2005 instead of 1990.</span> \n<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER inaccurately states that Kayahan most recently performed in February, whereas the DOCUMENT states he performed on Valentine's Day.</span> \n<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's full name, birthdate, and other key biographical details.</span> \n<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's love songs or his album 'I Made a Vow' as being his"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the essence of the DOCUMENT. \n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of death, which is a crucial piece of information in the DOCUMENT.\n- The ANSWER is incorrect about Kayahan's first cancer diagnosis year, stating 2005 instead of 1990.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately states that Kayahan most recently performed in February, whereas the DOCUMENT states he performed on Valentine's Day.\n- The ANSWER only highlights Kayahan's contributions to pop music, whereas the DOCUMENT also mentions his accomplishments as a songwriter and guitarist.\n- The ANSWER fails to mention Kayahan's full name, birthdate, and other key biographical details.\n- The ANSWER does not contain any information about the reaction of Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu to Kayahan's death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's love songs or his album 'I Made a Vow' as being his most popular.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's final album release year.\n- The ANSWER does not mention other artists recording his material throughout his career.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's physical condition and how it changed over time.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's Eurovision Song Contest participation.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthplace or where he grew up.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's prime ministerial reaction to his death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's death cause.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's cancer return years.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's guitar accompaniment.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's vocal quality.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his final album release.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his cancer diagnosis.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's cancer diagnosis year.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthday.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthdate.\n\""
] |
417
|
{
"_id": 417,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"A thorough analysis of the DOCUMENT and ANSWER was performed to determine if the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER mentions that St Louis was hit by flash floods, which is supported by the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that 'roads around St Louis, Missouri, were deluged with rainwater following fierce thunderstorms' and 'areas of flash flooding were commonplace throughout St. Louis County'. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions that a nearby town had more than three inches of rain in less than half an hour, which is partially supported by the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe DOCUMENT states that'several crashes followed the atrocious driving weather, though no injuries were immediately reported', but this detail is not mentioned in the ANSWER.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of mentioning flash floods and the severe weather, but it lacks other important details and does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER mentions that St Louis was hit by flash floods, which is supported by the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER only mentions that a nearby town had more than three inches of rain in less than half an hour, which is partially supported by the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"A thorough analysis of the DOCUMENT and ANSWER was performed to determine if the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER mentions that St Louis was hit by flash floods, which is supported by the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that 'roads around St Louis, Missouri, were deluged with rainwater following fierce thunderstorms' and 'areas of flash flooding were commonplace throughout St. Louis County'. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions that a nearby town had more than three inches of rain in less than half an hour, which is partially supported by the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe DOCUMENT states that'several crashes followed the atrocious driving weather, though no injuries were immediately reported', but this detail is not mentioned in the ANSWER.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of mentioning flash floods and the severe weather, but it lacks other important details and does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER mentions that St Louis was hit by flash floods, which is supported by the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER only mentions that a nearby town had more than three inches of rain in less than half an hour, which is partially supported by the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
584
|
{
"_id": 584,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the extent of the problem, as it states 1 in 16 truck drivers are high when pulled over, whereas the DOCUMENT states 1 in 12 truck drivers test positive for drugs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the secretive codes over radio systems used by truck drivers, which is a key detail in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Inspector Rankin, who states that ingesting substances impacts critically on one's ability to drive, observe, and control the vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the loophole in the law that allows drivers to work a 16.25 hour day in 24 hours.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Simon Green, who claims that 10 per cent of drivers are using illicit substances.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online in February exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the alarming number of truck crashes on the road each year.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Inspector Rankin, who states that the manipulation of work diaries gives drivers the opportunity to drive in excess of their prescribed hours four times in a seven-day period and be non-prosecutable.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"Truck drivers in Victoria are dealing drugs using codes over their radios.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the secretive codes over radio systems used by truck drivers, which is a key detail in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"It has been reported that 1 in 16 truck drivers are high when pulled over.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not accurately represent the figure of 1 in 12 truck drivers test positive for drugs when they are pulled over, as stated in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"According to a former truckie, the trend is more common that you think.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Inspector Rankin, who states that ingesting substances impacts critically on one's ability to drive, observe, and control the vehicle.</span>\", \"Many are rorting the system so they can drive for 16 hours a day.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the loophole in the law that allows drivers to work a 16.25 hour day in 24 hours, or the alarming number of truck crashes on the road each year.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the extent of the problem, as it states 1 in 16 truck drivers are high when pulled over, whereas the DOCUMENT states 1 in 12 truck drivers test positive for drugs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the secretive codes over radio systems used by truck drivers, which is a key detail in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Inspector Rankin, who states that ingesting substances impacts critically on one's ability to drive, observe, and control the vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the loophole in the law that allows drivers to work a 16.25 hour day in 24 hours.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Simon Green, who claims that 10 per cent of drivers are using illicit substances.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online in February exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the alarming number of truck crashes on the road each year.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Inspector Rankin, who states that the manipulation of work diaries gives drivers the opportunity to drive in excess of their prescribed hours four times in a seven-day period and be non-prosecutable.\""
] |
803
|
{
"_id": 803,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides a brief description of the location and the families living near the landfill, but it lacks the detailed information about the birds and the photographer's experience.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the intelligence of the birds or the photographer's connection with the people.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the photographer's past experiences or his reasons for choosing this project.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the photographer's description of the families' living conditions or their repurposing of materials.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the children's education or the photographer's efforts to help the people living in the landfill.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the photographer's background or his motivation for taking this project.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>Lack of detailed information about the birds</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Missing description of the families' living conditions</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>No mention of the photographer's background or motivation</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides a brief description of the location and the families living near the landfill, but it lacks the detailed information about the birds and the photographer's experience.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the intelligence of the birds or the photographer's connection with the people.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the photographer's past experiences or his reasons for choosing this project.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the photographer's description of the families' living conditions or their repurposing of materials.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the children's education or the photographer's efforts to help the people living in the landfill.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the photographer's background or his motivation for taking this project.\""
] |
342
|
{
"_id": 342,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides a general idea of the content of the DOCUMENT, but lacks specific details.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the exact amount of carbon emissions that the veggie balls will cut by half, nor does it mention the secret recipe of the veggie balls.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the veggie balls being available in the UK until May.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the international food fraud scandal in 2013.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the history of IKEA or its founder Ingvar Kamprad.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the flat-pack idea coming from shipping a table by rail.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the cost of the veggie balls.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>Lacks specific details about the veggie balls' secret recipe and exact carbon emissions reduction</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Does not mention the international food fraud scandal in 2013</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Does not provide information about the history of IKEA or its founder Ingvar Kamprad</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Does not mention the flat-pack idea coming from shipping a table by rail</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Does not provide information about the cost of the veggie balls</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides a general idea of the content of the DOCUMENT, but lacks specific details.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the exact amount of carbon emissions that the veggie balls will cut by half, nor does it mention the secret recipe of the veggie balls.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the veggie balls being available in the UK until May.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the international food fraud scandal in 2013.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the history of IKEA or its founder Ingvar Kamprad.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the flat-pack idea coming from shipping a table by rail.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the cost of the veggie balls.\""
] |
834
|
{
"_id": 834,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the scope of the research, the specific finding of 'foreign DNA' in sweet potatoes, or the researchers' conclusions about the natural process of genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the widespread presence of Agrobacterium in sweet potatoes across different regions.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the implications of the natural process of genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the advantages and disadvantages of natural and artificial genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study's findings on the transgenic process and its similarity to artificial processes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Dr. Lieve Gheysen's quote about the natural presence of Agrobacterium T-DNA in sweet potatoes and its stable inheritance during evolution.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the archeological findings of sweet potato domestication in Peru.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the different parts of the sweet potato that are edible.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' focus on Agrobacterium and its 'horizontal gene transfer' capabilities.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the total number of samples studied (291) or the researchers' conclusion that Agrobacterium was found in all samples.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the comparison between natural and artificial genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' statement that humans have been eating GM foods for much longer than they thought.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that sweet potatoes are not related to potatoes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the name of the researchers or institutions involved in the study.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study's conclusion that sweet potatoes all over the world contain this genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the implications of the natural process of genetic modification beyond human control.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the advantages of human-made GMOs over natural GMOs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the comparison between natural and artificial genetic modification beyond control.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the specific quote from Dr. Lieve Gheysen.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study's findings on the transgenic process and its similarity to artificial processes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' focus on Agrobacterium and its 'horizontal gene transfer' capabilities.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the total number of samples studied (291) or the researchers' conclusion that Agrobacterium was found in all samples.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the comparison between natural and artificial genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' statement that humans have been eating GM foods for much longer than they thought.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that sweet potatoes are not related to potatoes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the name of the researchers or institutions involved in the study.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention"
}
| null | null |
580
|
{
"_id": 580,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n \"The ANSWER does not fully capture the context of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions that Tottenham will consider all summer offers for Danny Rose, but the DOCUMENT states that Tottenham will resist any offers for Rose. This is a significant difference in the information provided.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention Mauricio Pochettino's statement about Danny Rose being the best English left back this season. This information is crucial to understanding the DOCUMENT's content.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the interest from Manchester City or the fact that Rose has been called up to the England squad. These points are essential to the context of the DOCUMENT.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information that is faithful to the DOCUMENT's context.\"\n], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER only mentions that Tottenham will consider all summer offers for Danny Rose, but the DOCUMENT states that Tottenham will resist any offers for Rose.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Mauricio Pochettino's statement about Danny Rose being the best English left back this season.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the interest from Manchester City or the fact that Rose has been called up to the England squad.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n \"The ANSWER does not fully capture the context of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions that Tottenham will consider all summer offers for Danny Rose, but the DOCUMENT states that Tottenham will resist any offers for Rose. This is a significant difference in the information provided.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention Mauricio Pochettino's statement about Danny Rose being the best English left back this season. This information is crucial to understanding the DOCUMENT's content.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the interest from Manchester City or the fact that Rose has been called up to the England squad. These points are essential to the context of the DOCUMENT.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information that is faithful to the DOCUMENT's context.\"\n"
] |
536
|
{
"_id": 536,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the essence of the DOCUMENT. It lacks the quotes from Andrew Thornton and Luke Harvey that provide insight into AP McCoy's unique riding style and personality. \nThe ANSWER also fails to mention the significance of McCoy's career, his two rides at Sandown, and the reaction of his colleagues to his retirement.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER contains incorrect information - AP McCoy is not getting married, and the Sandown track is not sold out.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT, it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a detailed analysis of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the tone and style of the DOCUMENT as it is more of a summary than an analysis.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any new insights into AP McCoy's career and personality.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"* The ANSWER lacks quotes from Andrew Thornton and Luke Harvey that provide insight into AP McCoy's unique riding style and personality.\n* The ANSWER fails to mention the significance of McCoy's career, his two rides at Sandown, and the reaction of his colleagues to his retirement.\n* The ANSWER contains incorrect information - AP McCoy is not getting married, and the Sandown track is not sold out.\n* The ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT, it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\n* The ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\n* The ANSWER does not provide a detailed analysis of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview.\n* The ANSWER does not capture the tone and style of the DOCUMENT as it is more of a summary than an analysis.\n* The ANSWER does not provide any new insights into AP McCoy's career and personality.\n* The ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\n* The ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\n* The ANSWER does not provide a detailed analysis of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview.\n* The ANSWER does not capture the tone and style of the DOCUMENT as it is more of a summary than an analysis.\n*"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the essence of the DOCUMENT. It lacks the quotes from Andrew Thornton and Luke Harvey that provide insight into AP McCoy's unique riding style and personality. \nThe ANSWER also fails to mention the significance of McCoy's career, his two rides at Sandown, and the reaction of his colleagues to his retirement.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER contains incorrect information - AP McCoy is not getting married, and the Sandown track is not sold out.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT, it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a detailed analysis of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the tone and style of the DOCUMENT as it is more of a summary than an analysis.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any new insights into AP McCoy's career and personality.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\n\""
] |
790
|
{
"_id": 790,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER contains several inaccuracies compared to the DOCUMENT. The couple allegedly locked the children in a closet, not a garage. The ANSWER also states that the children were fed from a bucket, but the DOCUMENT does not specify this. Furthermore, the ANSWER implies that the couple claimed the children were home-schooled, but the DOCUMENT states that Golden-Hazel claimed this, while the police did not find any books in the house. The ANSWER's statement that the boy was fed trash to eat is also consistent with the DOCUMENT, but the ANSWER's overall tone and wording are not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict the DOCUMENT, but it does not provide a faithful summary either.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER does not accurately represent the circumstances described in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Florida couple Quincy Hazel and Sabrina Golden-Hazel 'locked up the 12-year-old girl and 17-year-old boy in a closet for days on end' <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - locked in a garage)</span>, \n'They 'were eventually allowed to sleep on the floor of a bedroom but were fed from a bucket or found food to eat in the trash' <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - no mention of a bucket)</span>, \n'Their conditions emerged when the boy ran away from home last month and confided in a friend, who spoke to authorities <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - no mention of a friend)</span>, \n'Golden-Hazel claimed she home schooled the children but there were no books in the home <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - Golden-Hazel claimed this, but police did not find any books)</span>]\""
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER contains several inaccuracies compared to the DOCUMENT. The couple allegedly locked the children in a closet, not a garage. The ANSWER also states that the children were fed from a bucket, but the DOCUMENT does not specify this. Furthermore, the ANSWER implies that the couple claimed the children were home-schooled, but the DOCUMENT states that Golden-Hazel claimed this, while the police did not find any books in the house. The ANSWER's statement that the boy was fed trash to eat is also consistent with the DOCUMENT, but the ANSWER's overall tone and wording are not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict the DOCUMENT, but it does not provide a faithful summary either.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER does not accurately represent the circumstances described in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Florida couple Quincy Hazel and Sabrina Golden-Hazel 'locked up the 12-year-old girl and 17-year-old boy in a closet for days on end' <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - locked in a garage)</span>, \n'They 'were eventually allowed to sleep on the floor of a bedroom but were fed from a bucket or found food to eat in the trash' <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - no mention of a bucket)</span>, \n'Their conditions emerged when the boy ran away from home last month and confided in a friend, who spoke to authorities <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - no mention of a friend)</span>, \n'Golden-Hazel claimed she home schooled the children but there were no books in the home <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - Golden-Hazel claimed this, but police did not find any books)</span>"
] |
141
|
{
"_id": 141,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not mention Amanda Curtis, the founder of Nineteenth Amendment, as the person who took the picture of the quadruple rainbow. \nThe ANSWER incorrectly states that the phenomenon was seen by Louis Vuitton, a fashion brand, rather than Amanda Curtis.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the storm night in the tri-state area or the rare formation of two double rainbows.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any information about the image being taken in a split second while Amanda Curtis' train was coming in to the station.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the image being posted on Twitter or the hundreds of shares it received.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the Weather Channel interview with Amanda Curtis.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the New York City area or the Long Island Railroad station where the phenomenon was seen.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the order of the colors in the reflections.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the fact that Amanda Curtis was waiting for her commuter train when she took the picture.\",\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention Amanda Curtis, the founder of Nineteenth Amendment, as the person who took the picture of the quadruple rainbow.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not mention Amanda Curtis, the founder of Nineteenth Amendment, as the person who took the picture of the quadruple rainbow. \nThe ANSWER incorrectly states that the phenomenon was seen by Louis Vuitton, a fashion brand, rather than Amanda Curtis.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the storm night in the tri-state area or the rare formation of two double rainbows.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any information about the image being taken in a split second while Amanda Curtis' train was coming in to the station.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the image being posted on Twitter or the hundreds of shares it received.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the Weather Channel interview with Amanda Curtis.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the New York City area or the Long Island Railroad station where the phenomenon was seen.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the order of the colors in the reflections.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the fact that Amanda Curtis was waiting for her commuter train when she took the picture.\",\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention Amanda Curtis, the founder of Nineteenth Amendment, as the person who took the picture of the quadruple rainbow.</span>\""
] |
630
|
{
"_id": 630,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides the essential details of the DOCUMENT, including the date of the escape, the crime for which Moore was serving a sentence, and the reason for his capture.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide a detailed explanation of Moore's background and life after his escape.\", \"Additionally, the ANSWER does not mention the name change of Moore to Ronnie Dickinson in 2009.\", \"The ANSWER also does not mention the contempt of court charge in Kentucky.\", \"The ANSWER provides the essential details but lacks some context and additional information from the DOCUMENT.\", \"Despite this, the ANSWER is faithful to the main points of the DOCUMENT and does not contradict any information provided.\", \"Therefore, the ANSWER can be considered faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER could be more comprehensive and provide more details about Moore's life after his escape.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but could be improved with additional information.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER provides the essential details of the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER lacks some context and additional information from the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the name change of Moore to Ronnie Dickinson in 2009.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the contempt of court charge in Kentucky.\", \"* The ANSWER is faithful to the main points of the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides the essential details of the DOCUMENT, including the date of the escape, the crime for which Moore was serving a sentence, and the reason for his capture.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide a detailed explanation of Moore's background and life after his escape.\", \"Additionally, the ANSWER does not mention the name change of Moore to Ronnie Dickinson in 2009.\", \"The ANSWER also does not mention the contempt of court charge in Kentucky.\", \"The ANSWER provides the essential details but lacks some context and additional information from the DOCUMENT.\", \"Despite this, the ANSWER is faithful to the main points of the DOCUMENT and does not contradict any information provided.\", \"Therefore, the ANSWER can be considered faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER could be more comprehensive and provide more details about Moore's life after his escape.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but could be improved with additional information.\""
] |
72
|
{
"_id": 72,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides the same basic information as the DOCUMENT, but some minor details are missing or altered.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not include all the details provided in the DOCUMENT, such as the description of Christine Davidson's condition, her accomplishments as a fighter, and the family's emotional appeal.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the specific quote from Symantha about the family's online appeal or the description of the nursing home where Christine Davidson lived.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a summary of the main points in the DOCUMENT, but it is not a faithful representation of the entire document.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not include the specific quote from Symantha about the family's online appeal.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the description of Christine Davidson's condition.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the description of the nursing home where Christine Davidson lived.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the description of the family's emotional appeal.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the specific details about the jewellery store's offer of a $1000 reward.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides the same basic information as the DOCUMENT, but some minor details are missing or altered.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not include all the details provided in the DOCUMENT, such as the description of Christine Davidson's condition, her accomplishments as a fighter, and the family's emotional appeal.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the specific quote from Symantha about the family's online appeal or the description of the nursing home where Christine Davidson lived.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a summary of the main points in the DOCUMENT, but it is not a faithful representation of the entire document.\""
] |
712
|
{
"_id": 712,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not provide the full context of the heist, missing information about how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER also does not mention the value of the stolen items, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does not fully capture the complexity of the heist, which was described in the DOCUMENT as a sophisticated crime that may have involved inside knowledge. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brev"
}
| null | null |
507
|
{
"_id": 507,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER provides the same information as the DOCUMENT, including Bill Nye's quote about the smell of jet fuel and the details of the Earth Day trip, which is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER also includes additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the mention of Earth Day being meant to highlight climate change threats and the massive carbon footprint of the trip. This additional information is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER includes a phrase 'Engineer-turned-science-TV-host wrote to a White House pool reporter' which is not present in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER also includes the phrase 'Flights to the Florida Everglades and back will cover 1,836 miles and consume more than 9,180 gallons of fuel.' which is faithful to the DOCUMENT but is not a direct quote, the ANSWER paraphrased it.\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT because it includes additional information not present in the DOCUMENT and does not provide a direct quote.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"- The ANSWER provides the same information as the DOCUMENT, including Bill Nye's quote about the smell of jet fuel and the details of the Earth Day trip, which is faithful to the DOCUMENT. <span style='background-color:yellow'>[1]</span>\n- The ANSWER also includes additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the mention of Earth Day being meant to highlight climate change threats and the massive carbon footprint of the trip. This additional information is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. <span style='background-color:yellow'>[2]</span>\n- The ANSWER includes a phrase 'Engineer-turned-science-TV-host wrote to a White House pool reporter' which is not present in the DOCUMENT. <span style='background-color:yellow'>[3]</span>\n- The ANSWER also includes the phrase 'Flights to the Florida Everglades and back will cover 1,836 miles and consume more than 9,180 gallons of fuel.' which is faithful to the DOCUMENT but is not a direct quote, the ANSWER paraphrased it. <span style='background-color:green'>[4]</span>\"]"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER provides the same information as the DOCUMENT, including Bill Nye's quote about the smell of jet fuel and the details of the Earth Day trip, which is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER also includes additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the mention of Earth Day being meant to highlight climate change threats and the massive carbon footprint of the trip. This additional information is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER includes a phrase 'Engineer-turned-science-TV-host wrote to a White House pool reporter' which is not present in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER also includes the phrase 'Flights to the Florida Everglades and back will cover 1,836 miles and consume more than 9,180 gallons of fuel.' which is faithful to the DOCUMENT but is not a direct quote, the ANSWER paraphrased it.\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT because it includes additional information not present in the DOCUMENT and does not provide a direct quote.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"- The ANSWER provides the same information as the DOCUMENT, including Bill Nye's quote about the smell of jet fuel and the details of the Earth Day trip, which is faithful to the DOCUMENT. <span style='background-color:yellow'>[1"
] |
543
|
{
"_id": 543,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention Sean Hixon's team or the 80th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, which are crucial details in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the 887 statues, the 13ft average height, or the tuff and scoria used to carve the Moai, which are essential information in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the different methods proposed for raising the pukao, such as building a tower, using a pulley system, or putting the 'hat' on the statue before raising the whole statue.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the 100 pukao, the rounded oblong shape of the pukao, or the vertical marks and ring-shaped indentations on the side of the 'hats', which are key points in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's conclusion that less than 10 men could have rolled a 'hat' into place.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the erosion and damage to the sides of the pukao, which is an important detail in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the five-tonne replica of a statue, the dirt path in Hawaii, or the team's ability to move the replica upright with just a few ropes and 18 people.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' claims that the statues' bases were carved so they could lean forward to make them easier to transport.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the traditional storyline about the Rapa Nui people destroying their environment by cutting down trees.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the previous studies suggesting that a lost civilization chopped down trees on the island and laid the statues prone and rolled them into place using logs.\", \"The ANSWER only mentions the Rapa Nui people throwing red stone 'hats' on some of the statues, which is a very brief and incomplete summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information in the DOCUMENT, but it is not faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT as a whole.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer a clear and concise summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT as a whole.\", \"The ANSWER is not a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is not a faithful representation of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear and concise summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a complete and accurate summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a faithful representation of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a complete and accurate summary of the DOCUMENT.\","
}
| null | null |
530
|
{
"_id": 530,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER provides some details not mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as the estimated price of £20,000, and the date of the auction (April 9), which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does mention the rarity of the cel, but the DOCUMENT states that experts have tipped the submarine cartoon to fetch £10,000. \nThe ANSWER does mention the success of Yellow Submarine, but it is not as detailed as in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does mention the handwritten notes, but the DOCUMENT does not elaborate on this point. \nThe ANSWER does mention the unique characteristics of the cel, but the DOCUMENT does not elaborate on this point. \nThe ANSWER does mention the rarity of colour model cels from the film, but the DOCUMENT states that colour model cels from this film are very rare, and this is one of the single best cels of the Yellow Submarine we have seen. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nHowever, the ANSWER does not strictly follow the context provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article as requested. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the name of the auction house (Heritage Auctions) as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the director of animation art at Heritage Auctions as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the original cel being sold for £10,000 as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the Band Concert as the most expensive cel sold as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the animation being released in 1935 as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the reported sale price of £280,000 in 1999 as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the message of the film being 'all you need is love' as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the animation being ground-breaking as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the celluloid sheets being sold off in high street stores as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the image being unusually large as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the cel being one of the earliest final versions of the Yellow Submarine as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the cel being used to help determine the final approved colour scheme of the yellow submarine as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the cel being painted by the ink and paint department as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the cel being a rare hand-painted colour model cel as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the cel being one of"
}
| null | null |
816
|
{
"_id": 816,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides a summary of the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide the full context of the situation, such as Kate Upton's statement about the 'Cat Daddy' video, and the controversy surrounding Terry Richardson's work in the fashion industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the allegations made against Terry Richardson, such as the incident with Jamie Peck, the model who claimed Terry asked her to take out her tampon for him to play with.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the models who have spoken out against Terry Richardson, such as Rie Rasmussen and Coco Rocha.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a balanced view of the situation, as it only mentions the controversy surrounding Terry Richardson's work, without mentioning his popularity within the fashion industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear conclusion or verdict on the situation.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a partial summary of the DOCUMENT, but it does not provide a comprehensive understanding of the situation.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER provides a summary of the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the allegations made against Terry Richardson, such as the incident with Jamie Peck.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the models who have spoken out against Terry Richardson, such as Rie Rasmussen and Coco Rocha.\", \"* The ANSWER does not provide a balanced view of the situation, as it only mentions the controversy surrounding Terry Richardson's work.\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides a summary of the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide the full context of the situation, such as Kate Upton's statement about the 'Cat Daddy' video, and the controversy surrounding Terry Richardson's work in the fashion industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the allegations made against Terry Richardson, such as the incident with Jamie Peck, the model who claimed Terry asked her to take out her tampon for him to play with.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the models who have spoken out against Terry Richardson, such as Rie Rasmussen and Coco Rocha.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a balanced view of the situation, as it only mentions the controversy surrounding Terry Richardson's work, without mentioning his popularity within the fashion industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear conclusion or verdict on the situation.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a partial summary of the DOCUMENT, but it does not provide a comprehensive understanding of the situation.\""
] |
737
|
{
"_id": 737,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Analyze the ANSWER to determine if it is faithful to the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER contains the correct location of the phenomenon (Glen Cove LIRR station) and the name of the person who took the picture (Amanda Curtis).\",\n\"The ANSWER also contains the correct information that Amanda Curtis is a fashion entrepreneur and the founder of a fashion company.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct date of the phenomenon (Tuesday), it contains Wednesday which is incorrect.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the storm night in the tri-state area, it does not mention it at all.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about Amanda Curtis' decision to take the picture while her train was coming in to the station.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the order of the colors in the reflections.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the number of rainbows, it only mentions two double rainbows, but the ANSWER says 'formed of two separate double rainbows'.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the number of rainbows, it only mentions two double rainbows, but the ANSWER says 'formed of two separate double rainbows'.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Phenomenon formed of two separate double rainbows snapped on Wednesday.\", \n\"Fashion entrepreneur Amanda Curtis saw it at Glen Cove LIRR station.\", \n\"Phenomenon formed of two separate double rainbows\", \n\"Wednesday\", \n\"Storm night in the tri-state area\", \n\"Amanda Curtis' decision to take the picture while her train was coming in to the station\", \n\"Order of the colors in the reflections\", \n\"Number of rainbows\"]"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"Analyze the ANSWER to determine if it is faithful to the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER contains the correct location of the phenomenon (Glen Cove LIRR station) and the name of the person who took the picture (Amanda Curtis).\",\n\"The ANSWER also contains the correct information that Amanda Curtis is a fashion entrepreneur and the founder of a fashion company.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct date of the phenomenon (Tuesday), it contains Wednesday which is incorrect.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the storm night in the tri-state area, it does not mention it at all.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about Amanda Curtis' decision to take the picture while her train was coming in to the station.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the order of the colors in the reflections.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the number of rainbows, it only mentions two double rainbows, but the ANSWER says 'formed of two separate double rainbows'.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the number of rainbows, it only mentions two double rainbows, but the ANSWER says 'formed of two separate double rainbows'.\""
] |
70
|
{
"_id": 70,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER contains some incorrect information, such as the name 'Joann Callaway' which is not present in the DOCUMENT. This is a clear indication of the ANSWER being not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also mentions that the 61-year-old wanted to hand her ring down to her only granddaughter, which is incorrect as the DOCUMENT states that Christine Davidson wanted to give the ring to her 'only granddaughter who she was very close to - My daughter Jayda, 17'.\"], \"The ANSWER is faithful to the context provided in the DOCUMENT, as it correctly states that the family has launched an emotional public appeal to get the ring back and a local jewellery store has offered a $1000 reward for anyone providing information that leads to finding the missing ring.\"}, \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the name 'Joann Callaway' and the motivation behind Christine Davidson wanting to hand down the ring.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER incorrectly states that Christine Davidson wanted to hand down the ring to her only granddaughter.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER contains some incorrect information, such as the name 'Joann Callaway' which is not present in the DOCUMENT. This is a clear indication of the ANSWER being not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also mentions that the 61-year-old wanted to hand her ring down to her only granddaughter, which is incorrect as the DOCUMENT states that Christine Davidson wanted to give the ring to her 'only granddaughter who she was very close to - My daughter Jayda, 17'.\""
] |
165
|
{
"_id": 165,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch-led team, Malaysian investigators, or the location of the crash site in eastern Ukraine.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the plane was downed by a Thai mother with a passport.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the plane was downed on July 17, 2014, but it should be July 17, 2014 is mentioned in the ANSWER but the date is not.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the personal possessions found including jewellery and bracelets.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the recovery of 16 containers of fragments of the Malaysia Airlines plane.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch recovery mission or the head of the Dutch recovery mission Pieter-Jaap Aalbersberg.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the preliminary report that apportioned no blame or the investigation's focus on the repatriation mission, the criminal investigation, and prosecution.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch Justice Minister Ard van der Steur or the leaks suggesting regular troops were involved in the shooting of a BUK missile.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Kremlin's denial of involvement or the West's findings about the involvement of Russian forces.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) or the problems accessing the crash site.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the forensic experts in the Dutch city of Hilversum identifying bodies of 296 victims of the crash.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the two victims from the Netherlands remaining unidentified.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the probe team's report into the crash later this year.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch broadcaster RTL's report about shrapnel collected from the crash site matching the explosive charge of a ground-to-air BUK.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the alleged intercepted phone calls between rebels backing the version that the plane was downed by a BUK crew.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the problems accessing the crash site due to fighting between separatists and Ukrainian military forces.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the local official's statement about the smell of death hanging over the area nine months after the crash.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the vehicle carrying away debris from the site of the plane crash.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the sign indicating the entrance to the site in eastern Ukraine.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the recovery operation in November being delayed by fighting.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the recovery operation in Kharkiv and the Netherlands.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the investigators' renewed search for body parts and debris in eastern Ukraine.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the relatives of Mabel Anthonysamy Soosai calling for urgent action to clear the site, return items to bereaved families, and bring those responsible to justice.\", \"The ANSWER does"
}
| null | null |
196
|
{
"_id": 196,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only states that Real Madrid drew 0-0 with Atletico in the Champions League on Tuesday and that players that didn't start the clash returned to training on Wednesday. This information is present in the DOCUMENT, but the ANSWER does not add any new details. \nThe ANSWER also does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. It does not mention the names of players who did not start the Champions League match, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nHowever, the ANSWER does not include information about the second leg of the Champions League match against Atletico, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This information is not present in the ANSWER, but it is relevant to the context of the DOCUMENT. \nOverall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it only provides information that is present in the DOCUMENT and does not add any new details or contradict any information.\"\n], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Real Madrid drew 0-0 with Atletico in the Champions League on Tuesday (ANSWER: Real Madrid drew 0-0 with Atletico in the Champions League on Tuesday)\"\n]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only states that Real Madrid drew 0-0 with Atletico in the Champions League on Tuesday and that players that didn't start the clash returned to training on Wednesday. This information is present in the DOCUMENT, but the ANSWER does not add any new details. \nThe ANSWER also does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. It does not mention the names of players who did not start the Champions League match, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nHowever, the ANSWER does not include information about the second leg of the Champions League match against Atletico, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This information is not present in the ANSWER, but it is relevant to the context of the DOCUMENT. \nOverall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it only provides information that is present in the DOCUMENT and does not add any new details or contradict any information.\"\n"
] |
294
|
{
"_id": 294,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the couple's names. The DOCUMENT states that the couple's names are Eamon Sullivan and Naomi Bass, while the ANSWER claims they are Eamon Sullivan and Bambi Tooth. \nThe ANSWER also contains incorrect information about the couple's living arrangements. The DOCUMENT states that the couple met in Perth in 2011 and are now back in Perth, while the ANSWER claims they live with their three dogs in Perth.\nThe ANSWER contains incorrect information about Eamon Sullivan's previous relationship. The DOCUMENT states that Eamon Sullivan previously dated fellow swimmer Stephanie Rice for two years, while the ANSWER claims he previously dated fellow Olympic swimmer Stephanie Rice. However, it is also stated in the ANSWER that he dated Stephanie Rice, so it is not incorrect.\nThe ANSWER does not contain any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER does not accurately summarize the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contain the correct details of the proposal, such as the exact location and the ring presented to Naomi Bass.\nThe ANSWER does not contain the correct age of Naomi Bass.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the couple's names.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the couple's living arrangements.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains incorrect information about Eamon Sullivan's previous relationship.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not accurately summarize the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not contain the correct details of the proposal, such as the exact location and the ring presented to Naomi Bass.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not contain the correct age of Naomi Bass.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the couple's names. The DOCUMENT states that the couple's names are Eamon Sullivan and Naomi Bass, while the ANSWER claims they are Eamon Sullivan and Bambi Tooth. \nThe ANSWER also contains incorrect information about the couple's living arrangements. The DOCUMENT states that the couple met in Perth in 2011 and are now back in Perth, while the ANSWER claims they live with their three dogs in Perth.\nThe ANSWER contains incorrect information about Eamon Sullivan's previous relationship. The DOCUMENT states that Eamon Sullivan previously dated fellow swimmer Stephanie Rice for two years, while the ANSWER claims he previously dated fellow Olympic swimmer Stephanie Rice. However, it is also stated in the ANSWER that he dated Stephanie Rice, so it is not incorrect.\nThe ANSWER does not contain any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER does not accurately summarize the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contain the correct details of the proposal, such as the exact location and the ring presented to Naomi Bass.\nThe ANSWER does not contain the correct age of Naomi Bass.\n\""
] |
588
|
{
"_id": 588,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention Victoria as the location where truck drivers are dealing drugs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the specific distribution networks and meeting areas used by truck drivers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the number of truck drivers tested positive for drugs on Victoria's roads.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Detective Inspector Bernie Rankin's statements about the distribution networks and the risks to other motorists.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online in February exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Simon Green's statements about the prevalence of drug use in the trucking industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the loophole that allows drivers to work 16.25 hour days in 24 hours.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the law regarding maximum driving hours for heavy vehicle drivers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the impact of illicit substances on a driver's ability to drive.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention Victoria as the location where truck drivers are dealing drugs.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the specific distribution networks and meeting areas used by truck drivers.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the number of truck drivers tested positive for drugs on Victoria's roads.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention Detective Inspector Bernie Rankin's statements about the distribution networks and the risks to other motorists.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online in February exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention Simon Green's statements about the prevalence of drug use in the trucking industry.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the loophole that allows drivers to work 16.25 hour days in 24 hours.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the law regarding maximum driving hours for heavy vehicle drivers.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the impact of illicit substances on a driver's ability to drive.</span>\" ]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not mention Victoria as the location where truck drivers are dealing drugs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the specific distribution networks and meeting areas used by truck drivers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the number of truck drivers tested positive for drugs on Victoria's roads.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Detective Inspector Bernie Rankin's statements about the distribution networks and the risks to other motorists.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online in February exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Simon Green's statements about the prevalence of drug use in the trucking industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the loophole that allows drivers to work 16.25 hour days in 24 hours.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the law regarding maximum driving hours for heavy vehicle drivers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the impact of illicit substances on a driver's ability to drive.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
30
|
{
"_id": 30,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not match the DOCUMENT in several key points. \n- The DOCUMENT states that Arias was sentenced to life in prison, while the ANSWER claims she was sentenced to two years in prison.\n- The DOCUMENT explicitly states that Arias expressed remorse for her actions, which is also mentioned in the ANSWER.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly claims that Arias has no possibility for parole, whereas the DOCUMENT does not mention parole at all.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Travis Alexander's sisters giving their victim impact statements, which is a crucial part of the DOCUMENT.\n- The ANSWER does not mention the death penalty being taken off the table due to a second jury being deadlocked, which is a key point in the DOCUMENT.\n- The ANSWER does not mention the Lumley Unit in the Arizona State Prison Complex-Perryville where Arias will serve her sentence.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Maricopa County Judge Sherry Stephens' decision to sentence Arias to life in prison.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias was found guilty of first-degree murder in May 2013.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that a new jury was empanelled in October 2014 to decide Arias' fate, but they were also unable to reach a unanimous decision.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias was 34 years old when she was sentenced.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Travis Alexander was brutally taken from his family and friends.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias' sisters are trying to block her brother from their lives.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Hillary Alexander said she's trying to block her brother from her life.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias said she wishes there was some way she could take it back.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias was unable to reach a unanimous decision on whether she should live or die.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that the jury that convicted her found the murder was especially cruel.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Travis Alexander's family members gave their victim impact statements.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias will serve her sentence at the Lumley Unit in the Arizona State Prison Complex-Perryville near Goodyear, Arizona.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Maricopa County Judge Sherry Stephens' decision to sentence Arias to life in prison.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias was found guilty of first-degree murder in May 2013.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that a new jury was empanelled in October 2014 to decide Arias' fate, but they were also unable to reach a unanimous decision.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias was 34 years old when she was sentenced.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Travis Alexander was brutally taken from his family and"
}
| null | null |
291
|
{
"_id": 291,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, it appears that the ANSWER does not provide a full summary of the article. \nThe ANSWER does not mention Theresa May's statement about negotiating a new deal with Europe or the plan to limit the appeal of coming to Britain from poorer parts of the EU. \nThe ANSWER also does not mention the proposed tax and national insurance payments, nor the ban on 'exporting' child benefit for children living in other EU countries. \nHowever, the ANSWER does mention the ban on in-work benefits for migrants for four years and the deportation of unemployed EU migrants if they do not get a job after six months.\nThe ANSWER does mention the net migration figure of 298,000, but this information is not unique to the ANSWER and can be found in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER seems to be missing some key points from the DOCUMENT, making it an incomplete summary.\", \n\"Given that the ANSWER is an incomplete summary and does not provide new information, the final verdict should be 'PASS' if the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT and 'FAIL' if the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT because it does not provide a full summary of the article and misses some key points. \nHowever, since the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, the final verdict should be 'PASS'.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"* The ANSWER does not provide a full summary of the article.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not mention Theresa May's statement about negotiating a new deal with Europe or the plan to limit the appeal of coming to Britain from poorer parts of the EU.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not mention the proposed tax and national insurance payments, nor the ban on 'exporting' child benefit for children living in other EU countries.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does mention the ban on in-work benefits for migrants for four years and the deportation of unemployed EU migrants if they do not get a job after six months.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does mention the net migration figure of 298,000, but this information is not unique to the ANSWER and can be found in the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, it appears that the ANSWER does not provide a full summary of the article. \nThe ANSWER does not mention Theresa May's statement about negotiating a new deal with Europe or the plan to limit the appeal of coming to Britain from poorer parts of the EU. \nThe ANSWER also does not mention the proposed tax and national insurance payments, nor the ban on 'exporting' child benefit for children living in other EU countries. \nHowever, the ANSWER does mention the ban on in-work benefits for migrants for four years and the deportation of unemployed EU migrants if they do not get a job after six months.\nThe ANSWER does mention the net migration figure of 298,000, but this information is not unique to the ANSWER and can be found in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER seems to be missing some key points from the DOCUMENT, making it an incomplete summary.\", \n\"Given that the ANSWER is an incomplete summary and does not provide new information, the final verdict should be 'PASS' if the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT and 'FAIL' if the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT because it does not provide a full summary of the article and misses some key points. \nHowever, since the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, the final verdict should be 'PASS'.\""
] |
302
|
{
"_id": 302,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the study conducted by scientists from Ghent University in Belgium and the International Potato Institute (CIP) as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' finding that sweet potatoes all over the world contain the genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that humans have been genetically engineering sweet potatoes for thousands of years.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the difference pointed out by the researchers between natural and artificial genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the advantage of human-made GMOs over natural GMOs as stated by Dr. Lieve Gheysen.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the archeological findings in caves of the Cholca Canyon in Peru that are 8,000 to 10,000 years old.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that sweet potatoes are not related to potatoes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the edible parts of sweet potatoes other than the storage root.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study focused around bacteria called Agrobacterium and its 'horizontal gene transfer' process.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER incorrectly states that humans have been genetically engineering sweet potatoes for thousands of years.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' finding that sweet potatoes all over the world contain the genetic modification.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the difference pointed out by the researchers between natural and artificial genetic modification.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the advantage of human-made GMOs over natural GMOs as stated by Dr. Lieve Gheysen.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the archeological findings in caves of the Cholca Canyon in Peru that are 8,000 to 10,000 years old.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the fact that sweet potatoes are not related to potatoes.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the edible parts of sweet potatoes other than the storage root.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the study focused around bacteria called Agrobacterium and its 'horizontal gene transfer' process.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not mention the study conducted by scientists from Ghent University in Belgium and the International Potato Institute (CIP) as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' finding that sweet potatoes all over the world contain the genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that humans have been genetically engineering sweet potatoes for thousands of years.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the difference pointed out by the researchers between natural and artificial genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the advantage of human-made GMOs over natural GMOs as stated by Dr. Lieve Gheysen.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the archeological findings in caves of the Cholca Canyon in Peru that are 8,000 to 10,000 years old.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that sweet potatoes are not related to potatoes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the edible parts of sweet potatoes other than the storage root.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study focused around bacteria called Agrobacterium and its 'horizontal gene transfer' process.\""
] |
601
|
{
"_id": 601,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of the key points mentioned. However, it lacks specific details such as the range of prices for Bentleys, the joint fourth place of Chevrolet and Mazda, and the specific models of the most reliable and least reliable cars. \n\nAdditionally, the ANSWER does not mention the common faults found in the cars, such as electrical and axle/suspension faults. \n\nDespite these omissions, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. \n\nTherefore, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but lacks specific details and additional context.\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but does not provide a comprehensive summary.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n* \"Bentleys and Porsches started bottom of reliability table of manufacturers\" - This is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n* \"Cars were assessed on their failure rate, age, mileage and cost of repairs\" - This is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n* \"Most reliable was Honda, with Suzuki second and Toyota in third place\" - This is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n* \"The ANSWER lacks specific details such as the range of prices for Bentleys, the joint fourth place of Chevrolet and Mazda, and the specific models of the most reliable and least reliable cars.\" - This is an omission, not a contradiction.\n* \"The ANSWER does not mention the common faults found in the cars, such as electrical and axle/suspension faults\" - This is an omission, not a contradiction.\n* \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT\" - This is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n* \"The ANSWER does not provide a comprehensive summary\" - This is an omission, not a contradiction."
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of the key points mentioned. However, it lacks specific details such as the range of prices for Bentleys, the joint fourth place of Chevrolet and Mazda, and the specific models of the most reliable and least reliable cars. \n\nAdditionally, the ANSWER does not mention the common faults found in the cars, such as electrical and axle/suspension faults. \n\nDespite these omissions, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. \n\nTherefore, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but lacks specific details and additional context.\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but does not provide a comprehensive summary.\""
] |
618
|
{
"_id": 618,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully summarize the article, as it only mentions a few tips and omits others.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide the same information as the DOCUMENT, such as the cost of the wedding being £25,000.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does mention a few budgeting tips mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as seating guests on larger tables and offering a signature cocktail menu.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention some of the other tips mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as shopping out of season, calling on friends for help, and going online.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER does not provide a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='background-color: yellow'>The ANSWER does not fully summarize the article, as it only mentions a few tips and omits others.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color: yellow'>The ANSWER does not provide the same information as the DOCUMENT, such as the cost of the wedding being £25,000.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color: yellow'>The ANSWER does not mention some of the other tips mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as shopping out of season and going online.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not fully summarize the article, as it only mentions a few tips and omits others.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide the same information as the DOCUMENT, such as the cost of the wedding being £25,000.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does mention a few budgeting tips mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as seating guests on larger tables and offering a signature cocktail menu.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention some of the other tips mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as shopping out of season, calling on friends for help, and going online.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER does not provide a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
23
|
{
"_id": 23,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT. It does not mention the various changes made to the Boston Marathon route, the focus on family unification, the lessons learned from the trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, or the need for police officers to be adequately trained for modern weapons. \n\nThe ANSWER also does not provide a summary of the article in the same way the DOCUMENT does. It only mentions the timing of the Boston Marathon and the trial, without providing context.\n\nThe ANSWER does mention the author's opinion that it was good disaster response that kept the marathon bombing from being worse, which is a key point made in the DOCUMENT. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER does not provide a clear explanation of the author's views on the topic, nor does it acknowledge the complexities of the issue.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT, as it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article and does not fully capture the author's views on the topic.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article in the same way the DOCUMENT does.\", \"The ANSWER mentions the author's opinion on disaster response, but does not provide a clear explanation of the author's views on the topic.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT. It does not mention the various changes made to the Boston Marathon route, the focus on family unification, the lessons learned from the trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, or the need for police officers to be adequately trained for modern weapons. \n\nThe ANSWER also does not provide a summary of the article in the same way the DOCUMENT does. It only mentions the timing of the Boston Marathon and the trial, without providing context.\n\nThe ANSWER does mention the author's opinion that it was good disaster response that kept the marathon bombing from being worse, which is a key point made in the DOCUMENT. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER does not provide a clear explanation of the author's views on the topic, nor does it acknowledge the complexities of the issue.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT, as it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article and does not fully capture the author's views on the topic.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article in the same way the DOCUMENT does.\", \"The ANSWER mentions the author's opinion on disaster response, but does not provide a clear explanation of the author's views on the topic.\""
] |
299
|
{
"_id": 299,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER provides an accurate summary of the DOCUMENT, covering the key points of the proposal, including the location, the proposal itself, and the couple's background.\nHowever, the ANSWER lacks the additional context provided in the DOCUMENT, such as the specific dates and details of the couple's relationship and the proposal.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER includes some information that is not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the mention of the couple living with three dogs and Sullivan's previous relationship with Stephanie Rice.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER provides a faithful summary of the main points in the DOCUMENT, but lacks some additional context and includes some extraneous information.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"\\\"Eamon Sullivan surprised his girlfriend Naomi Bass in Kyoto, Japan.\\\" <--- This is a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"\\\"The proposal took place under a cherry blossom tree filled with white doves.\\\" <--- This is also a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"\\\"Pair met in Perth in 2011, where they live with their three dogs.\\\" <--- This information is not present in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"\\\"Sullivan previously dated fellow Olympic swimmer Stephanie Rice.\\\" <--- This information is not present in the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER provides an accurate summary of the DOCUMENT, covering the key points of the proposal, including the location, the proposal itself, and the couple's background.\nHowever, the ANSWER lacks the additional context provided in the DOCUMENT, such as the specific dates and details of the couple's relationship and the proposal.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER includes some information that is not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the mention of the couple living with three dogs and Sullivan's previous relationship with Stephanie Rice.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER provides a faithful summary of the main points in the DOCUMENT, but lacks some additional context and includes some extraneous information.\""
] |
86
|
{
"_id": 86,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER partially summarizes the DOCUMENT but does not provide a comprehensive summary. The ANSWER lacks information about the 40ft long swimming pool, the 360 degree view, the 18-wheelers, and the final tour for the American Institute of Architects. The ANSWER also does not mention the use of spray foam for insulation and the structural integrity restoration with columns. The ANSWER does mention the roof deck, the two-story glass-paneled tower, and the use of shipping containers as a material, which is accurate. However, it does not provide the same level of detail as the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information in the DOCUMENT. However, it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER's lack of detail and omission of certain key points may lead to a less accurate understanding of the DOCUMENT's content.\", \"The ANSWER does not fully capture the complexity and uniqueness of the PV14 home, as described in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER mentions the roof deck (ANSWER: 'The home also boasts a 1,400 sq ft roof deck'), the two-story glass-paneled tower (ANSWER: 'Containers were also used to build a stunning two-story glass-paneled tower'), and the use of shipping containers as a material (ANSWER: 'He wanted to stay true to the materials and thus left the ceilings exposed to show the containers').\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the 360 degree view (ANSWER: 'The home also boasts a 1,400 sq ft roof deck and a 360 degree view of White Rock Lake and the city's downtown'), the 40ft long swimming pool (ANSWER: 'The home, dubbed 'PV14,' boasts a 40ft long swimming pool on the ground floor'), the 18-wheelers (ANSWER: '200 people watched as 18-wheelers transported the materials that would become this stunning three-bedroom home'), and the final tour for the American Institute of Architects (ANSWER: 'And after more than two years of design and construction, and a final tour for the Dallas chapter of the American Institute of Architects, the couple are finally preparing to move into their new home').\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the use of spray foam for insulation (ANSWER: 'Spray foam was also used between the building layers, to provide insulation that the containers can't provide, according to Inhabitat.') and the structural integrity restoration with columns (ANSWER: 'Because the walls of the shipping containers were removed, Gooden said columns had to be placed around the house to restore structural integrity to the materials.')\"}}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER partially summarizes the DOCUMENT but does not provide a comprehensive summary. The ANSWER lacks information about the 40ft long swimming pool, the 360 degree view, the 18-wheelers, and the final tour for the American Institute of Architects. The ANSWER also does not mention the use of spray foam for insulation and the structural integrity restoration with columns. The ANSWER does mention the roof deck, the two-story glass-paneled tower, and the use of shipping containers as a material, which is accurate. However, it does not provide the same level of detail as the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information in the DOCUMENT. However, it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER's lack of detail and omission of certain key points may lead to a less accurate understanding of the DOCUMENT's content.\", \"The ANSWER does not fully capture the complexity and uniqueness of the PV14 home, as described in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
582
|
{
"_id": 582,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention Manchester City's consideration of Danny Rose as a transfer target, which is a key point from the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention that Tottenham will resist all summer offers for Rose, instead stating that Tottenham will resist 'any offers' for Rose.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the stats and performances that Mauricio Pochettino praised about Danny Rose.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"Manchester City have written off Danny Rose as a transfer target **(FAIL)**\", \"Rose is a rising star and City's squad is short of homegrown players **(FAIL)**\", \"But Spus boss Mauricio Pochettino is a big fan of his left back **(FAIL)**\", \"Tottenham will resist all summer offers for Rose **(FAIL)**\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not mention Manchester City's consideration of Danny Rose as a transfer target, which is a key point from the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention that Tottenham will resist all summer offers for Rose, instead stating that Tottenham will resist 'any offers' for Rose.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the stats and performances that Mauricio Pochettino praised about Danny Rose.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
359
|
{
"_id": 359,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the coin being smaller than a penny, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the image of the goddess Tanit on one side and the horse's head on the reverse, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is also a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the village of Saltford being on a major trade route long before Roman times, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is another discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the find being the oldest dateable evidence of human activity found in Saltford and the West of England, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Professor David Mattingly's statement, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Phil Harding's statement, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the hoard of Roman and Late Iron Age coins found in Dovedale, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention National Trust archaeologist Rachael Hall's statement, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the cave in Dovedale being undisturbed for 2,000 years, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the Corieltavi tribe, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the River Avon flowing into the Bristol Channel, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the image of the horse's head and the Carthaginian goddess Tanit on the coin, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the coin being dated to between 300 BC and 264 BC, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the coin being one of the oldest coins ever to be found in England, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT"
}
| null | null |
136
|
{
"_id": 136,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER provides some additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the exact number of counts (27) and the range of fees ($300 to $350), which is not present in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER also states that Bollaert 'operated ugotposted.com, where anonymous users posted nudes without the subject's consent', which is present in the DOCUMENT but not in the ANSWER's exact wording. \nHowever, the ANSWER does correctly state that Bollaert earned tens of thousands of dollars from running a site and that he was sentenced to 20 years, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER also correctly states that prosecutors said Bollaert took pleasure in hurting women, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER's claim that Bollaert was found guilty of 27 counts of identity theft and extortion is not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that he was found guilty of 21 counts of identity theft and six counts of extortion. \nThe ANSWER's statement that Judge said the sentence reflected the amount of victims is also not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that the judge said the sentence accurately reflected the amount of victims he hurt.\nThe ANSWER's statement that Bollaert 'then earned tens of thousands from running changemyreputation.com' is not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that he earned about $30,000 from victims.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\" * The ANSWER provides some additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the exact number of counts (27) and the range of fees ($300 to $350)\"]\n}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER provides some additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the exact number of counts (27) and the range of fees ($300 to $350), which is not present in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER also states that Bollaert 'operated ugotposted.com, where anonymous users posted nudes without the subject's consent', which is present in the DOCUMENT but not in the ANSWER's exact wording. \nHowever, the ANSWER does correctly state that Bollaert earned tens of thousands of dollars from running a site and that he was sentenced to 20 years, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER also correctly states that prosecutors said Bollaert took pleasure in hurting women, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER's claim that Bollaert was found guilty of 27 counts of identity theft and extortion is not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that he was found guilty of 21 counts of identity theft and six counts of extortion. \nThe ANSWER's statement that Judge said the sentence reflected the amount of victims is also not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that the judge said the sentence accurately reflected the amount of victims he hurt.\nThe ANSWER's statement that Bollaert 'then earned tens of thousands from running changemyreputation.com' is not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that he earned about $30,000 from victims.\n\""
] |
447
|
{
"_id": 447,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Lisa Courtney is the one who holds the Guinness World Record for the largest collection of Pokemon items, not Sharon Courtney. \nLisa started collecting Pokemon at the age of 9 after being bullied at school, but the DOCUMENT does not explicitly state this.\nLisa spends 7 hours a week browsing the internet for new Pokemon releases, but the DOCUMENT does not mention'surfing the internet'. \nLisa's vast collection ranges from cuddly toys to exclusive merchandise, including items made in Japan.\nThe DOCUMENT does not mention cornflakes made in Japan as part of Lisa's collection.\nThe DOCUMENT states that Lisa's mother had to move from the largest room to the smallest room in their house to make room for her daughter's collection, but this detail is not present in the ANSWER.\nThe ANSWER does mention Lisa's mother, Sharon, and her love for Pokemon, but this information is not new and is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"Lisa Courtney holds the Guinness World Record for the largest collection (ANSWER: Sharon Courtney holds the Guinness World Record for largest collection)\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Lisa Courtney is the one who holds the Guinness World Record for the largest collection of Pokemon items, not Sharon Courtney. \nLisa started collecting Pokemon at the age of 9 after being bullied at school, but the DOCUMENT does not explicitly state this.\nLisa spends 7 hours a week browsing the internet for new Pokemon releases, but the DOCUMENT does not mention'surfing the internet'. \nLisa's vast collection ranges from cuddly toys to exclusive merchandise, including items made in Japan.\nThe DOCUMENT does not mention cornflakes made in Japan as part of Lisa's collection.\nThe DOCUMENT states that Lisa's mother had to move from the largest room to the smallest room in their house to make room for her daughter's collection, but this detail is not present in the ANSWER.\nThe ANSWER does mention Lisa's mother, Sharon, and her love for Pokemon, but this information is not new and is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\""
] |
736
|
{
"_id": 736,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Analyzing the ANSWER, it seems to have taken out some information that is present in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions 'Asia' instead of 'Europe' when discussing the potential destination of refugees, and it does not mention 'Strasbourg' or the European Parliament debate. \nHowever, the ANSWER does capture the essence of Nigel Farage's comments, which are centered around the potential threat of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization. \nThe ANSWER also mentions Farage's concerns about EU passports allowing refugees to move to Britain, which is present in the DOCUMENT. \nOverall, the ANSWER seems to be faithful to the DOCUMENT, but it has removed some crucial context and details.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information present in the DOCUMENT. It does not introduce any new information that is not present in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER's focus on the potential threat of jihadis and the EU passport issue is consistent with the DOCUMENT's content.\", \n\"The ANSWER's brevity and lack of context may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not capture the full scope of Farage's comments, which include his opposition to EU action on migrant deaths in the Mediterranean and his criticism of the British political class.\", \n\"The ANSWER's omission of these details may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not provide any new information that is not present in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER's focus on the core issue of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization is consistent with the DOCUMENT's content.\", \n\"The ANSWER's brevity and lack of context may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER's failure to capture the full scope of Farage's comments and the context of the European Parliament debate may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='background-color:yellow'>The ANSWER only mentions 'Asia' instead of 'Europe' when discussing the potential destination of refugees.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color:yellow'>The ANSWER does not mention 'Strasbourg' or the European Parliament debate.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color:blue'>The ANSWER does capture the essence of Nigel Farage's comments, which are centered around the potential threat of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color:blue'>The ANSWER also mentions Farage's concerns about EU passports allowing refugees to move to Britain, which is present in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color:blue'>The ANSWER's focus on the core issue of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization is consistent with the DOCUMENT's content.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color:red'>The ANSW"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Analyzing the ANSWER, it seems to have taken out some information that is present in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions 'Asia' instead of 'Europe' when discussing the potential destination of refugees, and it does not mention 'Strasbourg' or the European Parliament debate. \nHowever, the ANSWER does capture the essence of Nigel Farage's comments, which are centered around the potential threat of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization. \nThe ANSWER also mentions Farage's concerns about EU passports allowing refugees to move to Britain, which is present in the DOCUMENT. \nOverall, the ANSWER seems to be faithful to the DOCUMENT, but it has removed some crucial context and details.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information present in the DOCUMENT. It does not introduce any new information that is not present in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER's focus on the potential threat of jihadis and the EU passport issue is consistent with the DOCUMENT's content.\", \n\"The ANSWER's brevity and lack of context may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not capture the full scope of Farage's comments, which include his opposition to EU action on migrant deaths in the Mediterranean and his criticism of the British political class.\", \n\"The ANSWER's omission of these details may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not provide any new information that is not present in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER's focus on the core issue of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization is consistent with the DOCUMENT's content.\", \n\"The ANSWER's brevity and lack of context may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER's failure to capture the full scope of Farage's comments and the context of the European Parliament debate may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\""
] |
583
|
{
"_id": 583,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Analysis of the ANSWER reveals that it contains incorrect information. The ANSWER states that Manchester United have identified Danny Rose as a transfer target, but the DOCUMENT does not mention Manchester United as a potential suitor. \nThe ANSWER also incorrectly states that Spurs boss Mauricio Pochettino is a big fan of Danny Rose, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that Pochettino is a fan of Rose and does not intend to sell him.\nThe ANSWER correctly states that Tottenham will resist all summer offers for Rose, which aligns with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Manchester United have identified Danny Rose as a transfer target.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Spurs boss Mauricio Pochettino is a big fan of Danny Rose.\"] }"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Analysis of the ANSWER reveals that it contains incorrect information. The ANSWER states that Manchester United have identified Danny Rose as a transfer target, but the DOCUMENT does not mention Manchester United as a potential suitor. \nThe ANSWER also incorrectly states that Spurs boss Mauricio Pochettino is a big fan of Danny Rose, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that Pochettino is a fan of Rose and does not intend to sell him.\nThe ANSWER correctly states that Tottenham will resist all summer offers for Rose, which aligns with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\""
] |
120
|
{
"_id": 120,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the age of Sherry Arnold at the time of her death (44, not 43), and the involvement of Lester Van Walters Jr in the crime (the DOCUMENT only mentions the name 'Lester Van Waters Jr'). The ANSWER also provides a slightly different phrasing for the events of the crime, but the overall details match the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it does not fully capture the nuances of the DOCUMENT's text either.\", \"The ANSWER mentions that Spell did not understand the case against him and was mentally unfit to stand trial, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT, but it also adds that prosecutors agreed he was mentally ill but said he could stand trial, which is not explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span>Sherry Arnold, a 44-year-old math teacher from Sidney, Montana, was on a morning jog on January 7, 2012, when she was killed.</span> (not present in the DOCUMENT)\", \"<span>Michael Keith Spell, 25, of parachute, Colorado, confessed at the time to pulling her into a car while his friend, Lester Van Walters Jr, strangled her.</span> (not present in the DOCUMENT)\", \"<span>Defense experts said Spell did not understand the case against and was mentally unfit to stand trial.</span> (present in the DOCUMENT but slightly rephrased)\", \"<span>Prosecutors agreed he was mentally ill but said he could stand trial, recommending 100 years prison.</span> (not explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT)\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the age of Sherry Arnold at the time of her death (44, not 43), and the involvement of Lester Van Walters Jr in the crime (the DOCUMENT only mentions the name 'Lester Van Waters Jr'). The ANSWER also provides a slightly different phrasing for the events of the crime, but the overall details match the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it does not fully capture the nuances of the DOCUMENT's text either.\", \"The ANSWER mentions that Spell did not understand the case against him and was mentally unfit to stand trial, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT, but it also adds that prosecutors agreed he was mentally ill but said he could stand trial, which is not explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
396
|
{
"_id": 396,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides an inaccurate description of the case's timeline, stating that the murder occurred between 2012 and 2013, when the DOCUMENT actually states that the murders occurred about a year apart (one in 2012 and one in 2013).\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly identifies the first victim as Tim Barnack, when the DOCUMENT states that the first victim was Stephen Delicino. Additionally, the ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica killed Delicino in self-defense when he attacked her, as the DOCUMENT states that Monica's claim of self-defense was disputed by the prosecution. Furthermore, the ANSWER misrepresents Monica's claim about Robert Haney, stating that she found him being eaten by her pigs and shot him out of mercy, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs, but the jurors did not believe her story.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica never reported either of their deaths to police, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs, but the jurors did not believe her story.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly highlights that Monica's cellmate testified that she signed a birthday card in jail with the phrase 'from the sweetest murderer in Jackson County', when the DOCUMENT actually states that it was Monica's cellmate who testified about the birthday card, not that Monica signed it herself.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Monica asked to demonstrate how she claimed she shot Delicino, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica asked to demonstrate how she claimed she shot Haney, but the judge initially ignored her request.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER incorrectly describes the timeline of the case\", \"* The ANSWER incorrectly identifies the first victim and the circumstances of their death\", \"* The ANSWER misrepresents Monica's claim about Robert Haney\", \"* The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica never reported either of their deaths to police\", \"* The ANSWER incorrectly highlights a different aspect of the testimony\", \"* The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica asked to demonstrate how she claimed she shot Delicino\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides an inaccurate description of the case's timeline, stating that the murder occurred between 2012 and 2013, when the DOCUMENT actually states that the murders occurred about a year apart (one in 2012 and one in 2013).\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly identifies the first victim as Tim Barnack, when the DOCUMENT states that the first victim was Stephen Delicino. Additionally, the ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica killed Delicino in self-defense when he attacked her, as the DOCUMENT states that Monica's claim of self-defense was disputed by the prosecution. Furthermore, the ANSWER misrepresents Monica's claim about Robert Haney, stating that she found him being eaten by her pigs and shot him out of mercy, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs, but the jurors did not believe her story.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica never reported either of their deaths to police, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs, but the jurors did not believe her story.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly highlights that Monica's cellmate testified that she signed a birthday card in jail with the phrase 'from the sweetest murderer in Jackson County', when the DOCUMENT actually states that it was Monica's cellmate who testified about the birthday card, not that Monica signed it herself.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Monica asked to demonstrate how she claimed she shot Delicino, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica asked to demonstrate how she claimed she shot Haney, but the judge initially ignored her request.\""
] |
728
|
{
"_id": 728,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Basis of comparison: The ANSWER provides information about the Europa League semi-finals, including the teams and the dates of the semi-final and last-four ties. The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. However, the ANSWER does not provide information about the Champions League semi-final draw, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also does not mention the draw for the Europa League semi-finals being made at UEFA's headquarters in Nyon, as stated in the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER provides the teams for the Europa League semi-finals, which matches the information in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also provides the dates of the semi-final and last-four ties, which is consistent with the information in the DOCUMENT. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER does not mention the other tie between Napoli and Dnipro, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT as taking place on May 27. The ANSWER also does not mention the National Stadium in Warsaw as the location of the semi-final, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \n\nOverall, the ANSWER provides some information consistent with the DOCUMENT, but it is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n*\"The ANSWER does not provide information about the Champions League semi-final draw, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.*\", \n*\"The ANSWER does not mention the draw for the Europa League semi-finals being made at UEFA's headquarters in Nyon, as stated in the DOCUMENT.*\", \n*\"The ANSWER does not mention the other tie between Napoli and Dnipro, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT as taking place on May 27.*\", \n*\"The ANSWER does not mention the National Stadium in Warsaw as the location of the semi-final, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.*\""
}
|
PASS
| null |
733
|
{
"_id": 733,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n \"The ANSWER contains incorrect information: Mike Ford is the head coach of Bath, not a player, and he did not score 36 tries on the World circuit. The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Bath signed Mike Ford, when in fact it was Jeff Williams who signed. Additionally, the ANSWER incorrectly states that the team won in Toyko, when in fact it was England Sevens that won in Tokyo earlier this month.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the content of the DOCUMENT, as it provides new and incorrect information.\",\n \"The ANSWER contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT, specifically regarding the signing of Jeff Williams and the team's achievement in Tokyo.\"\n], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information: Mike Ford is the head coach of Bath, not a player.\", \"The ANSWER states that Bath signed Mike Ford, when in fact it was Jeff Williams who signed.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the team won in Toyko, when in fact it was England Sevens that won in Tokyo earlier this month.\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n \"The ANSWER contains incorrect information: Mike Ford is the head coach of Bath, not a player, and he did not score 36 tries on the World circuit. The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Bath signed Mike Ford, when in fact it was Jeff Williams who signed. Additionally, the ANSWER incorrectly states that the team won in Toyko, when in fact it was England Sevens that won in Tokyo earlier this month.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the content of the DOCUMENT, as it provides new and incorrect information.\",\n \"The ANSWER contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT, specifically regarding the signing of Jeff Williams and the team's achievement in Tokyo.\"\n"
] |
868
|
{
"_id": 868,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Comparing the DOCUMENT and ANSWER, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT because it includes key points from the DOCUMENT, such as the ranking of manufacturers by reliability and the most reliable models. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER is missing some crucial information from the DOCUMENT, such as the range of list prices for Bentleys and the fact that Porsche finished bottom of the reliability table. \n\nThe ANSWER also does not mention the most costly model to fix, the Audi RS6, which is a significant point from the DOCUMENT.\n\nDespite these omissions, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT and only provides a summary of the key points. \n\nTherefore, the ANSWER can be considered faithful to the DOCUMENT but could be improved by including more details.\", \n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, the ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not include any incorrect information.\", \n\"The ANSWER provides a summary of the key points from the DOCUMENT.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"* The ANSWER includes key points from the DOCUMENT, such as the ranking of manufacturers by reliability and the most reliable models.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not mention the range of list prices for Bentleys and the fact that Porsche finished bottom of the reliability table.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not mention the most costly model to fix, the Audi RS6.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not include any incorrect information.\", \n\"* The ANSWER provides a summary of the key points from the DOCUMENT.\"\"]"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Comparing the DOCUMENT and ANSWER, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT because it includes key points from the DOCUMENT, such as the ranking of manufacturers by reliability and the most reliable models. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER is missing some crucial information from the DOCUMENT, such as the range of list prices for Bentleys and the fact that Porsche finished bottom of the reliability table. \n\nThe ANSWER also does not mention the most costly model to fix, the Audi RS6, which is a significant point from the DOCUMENT.\n\nDespite these omissions, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT and only provides a summary of the key points. \n\nTherefore, the ANSWER can be considered faithful to the DOCUMENT but could be improved by including more details.\", \n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, the ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not include any incorrect information.\", \n\"The ANSWER provides a summary of the key points from the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
446
|
{
"_id": 446,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER claims Lisa Courtney lost the Guinness World Record for the largest collection, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that Lisa Courtney has the Guinness World Record for the largest collection of Pokemon items, but does not mention her losing the record.\", \"The ANSWER states that Lisa started amassing the items after being bullied aged nine, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. However, the DOCUMENT does not specify the exact age at which she started collecting.\", \"The ANSWER states that Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet looking for new characters, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT but not exactly phrased as'surfing the internet'.\", \"The ANSWER states that the vast hoard ranges from cuddly toys to cornflakes made in Japan, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but the lack of new information and the inaccuracies regarding the Guinness World Record and the age at which Lisa started collecting may impact the faithfulness of the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER claims Lisa Courtney lost the Guinness World Record for the largest collection, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER states that Lisa started amassing the items after being bullied aged nine, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT but not specified exactly.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER states that Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet looking for new characters, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT but not exactly phrased as'surfing the internet'.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER states that the vast hoard ranges from cuddly toys to cornflakes made in Japan, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER claims Lisa Courtney lost the Guinness World Record for the largest collection, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that Lisa Courtney has the Guinness World Record for the largest collection of Pokemon items, but does not mention her losing the record.\", \"The ANSWER states that Lisa started amassing the items after being bullied aged nine, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. However, the DOCUMENT does not specify the exact age at which she started collecting.\", \"The ANSWER states that Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet looking for new characters, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT but not exactly phrased as'surfing the internet'.\", \"The ANSWER states that the vast hoard ranges from cuddly toys to cornflakes made in Japan, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but the lack of new information and the inaccuracies regarding the Guinness World Record and the age at which Lisa started collecting may impact the faithfulness of the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
208
|
{
"_id": 208,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT. It lacks details about the context of the 'hot-or-not' videos, the impact on the children's self-esteem and academic performance, and the parents' and experts' concerns about the normalization of this behavior. The ANSWER also fails to mention the specific names and quotes from the DOCUMENT that illustrate the extent of the issue. The ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article's main points.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any new information that is not already present in the DOCUMENT. It does not contradict any information in the DOCUMENT and sticks to the main theme of the article. However, it is not faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article's content.\", \"The ANSWER does not include any quotes or specific examples from the DOCUMENT to support its claims. It lacks the depth and breadth of information that the DOCUMENT provides.\", \"The ANSWER's focus on the impact of 'hot-or-not' videos on the next generation is present, but it does not fully capture the complexity of the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the American origin of the 'hot-or-not' phenomenon and its spread to the UK, which is an important context for understanding the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not highlight the concerns of experts such as Rachel Simmons and Rosalind Wiseman about the normalization of this behavior and its impact on children's social skills and empathy.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER lacks details about the context of the 'hot-or-not' videos and their impact on the children's self-esteem and academic performance.\", \"* The ANSWER fails to mention the specific names and quotes from the DOCUMENT that illustrate the extent of the issue.\", \"* The ANSWER does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article's content.\", \"* The ANSWER does not include any quotes or specific examples from the DOCUMENT to support its claims.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the American origin of the 'hot-or-not' phenomenon and its spread to the UK.\", \"* The ANSWER does not highlight the concerns of experts such as Rachel Simmons and Rosalind Wiseman about the normalization of this behavior and its impact on children's social skills and empathy.\"\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT. It lacks details about the context of the 'hot-or-not' videos, the impact on the children's self-esteem and academic performance, and the parents' and experts' concerns about the normalization of this behavior. The ANSWER also fails to mention the specific names and quotes from the DOCUMENT that illustrate the extent of the issue. The ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article's main points.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any new information that is not already present in the DOCUMENT. It does not contradict any information in the DOCUMENT and sticks to the main theme of the article. However, it is not faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article's content.\", \"The ANSWER does not include any quotes or specific examples from the DOCUMENT to support its claims. It lacks the depth and breadth of information that the DOCUMENT provides.\", \"The ANSWER's focus on the impact of 'hot-or-not' videos on the next generation is present, but it does not fully capture the complexity of the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the American origin of the 'hot-or-not' phenomenon and its spread to the UK, which is an important context for understanding the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not highlight the concerns of experts such as Rachel Simmons and Rosalind Wiseman about the normalization of this behavior and its impact on children's social skills and empathy.\""
] |
311
|
{
"_id": 311,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not summarize the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not directly address the topic of surveys claiming to reveal what makes us most happy.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the author's personal opinions or feelings about the topic.\", \"The ANSWER is a direct quote from the DOCUMENT, but it is not a summary or an analysis of the article.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span>They claim to reveal what makes us happiest</span>. But are these generic lists really of any use to us?\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not summarize the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not directly address the topic of surveys claiming to reveal what makes us most happy.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the author's personal opinions or feelings about the topic.\", \"The ANSWER is a direct quote from the DOCUMENT, but it is not a summary or an analysis of the article.\""
] |
209
|
{
"_id": 209,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not summarize the article as required. It only states the main point of the DOCUMENT without elaboration. The ANSWER does not mention the effects of 'hot-or-not' videos on children's self-esteem, grades, or school attendance. The ANSWER also fails to mention the involvement of parents, societal pressures, and the normalization of cruelty on TV shows. The ANSWER does not provide a conclusion or a call to action as the DOCUMENT does. The ANSWER lacks depth and fails to address the complexities of the issue presented in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. However, it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not highlight any specific spans from the DOCUMENT as required. It only provides a brief statement about the main point of the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": []}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not summarize the article as required. It only states the main point of the DOCUMENT without elaboration. The ANSWER does not mention the effects of 'hot-or-not' videos on children's self-esteem, grades, or school attendance. The ANSWER also fails to mention the involvement of parents, societal pressures, and the normalization of cruelty on TV shows. The ANSWER does not provide a conclusion or a call to action as the DOCUMENT does. The ANSWER lacks depth and fails to address the complexities of the issue presented in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. However, it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not highlight any specific spans from the DOCUMENT as required. It only provides a brief statement about the main point of the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
721
|
{
"_id": 721,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides a brief summary of the DOCUMENT, but it lacks specific details and quotes from the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does not mention Rebecca's Olympic achievements, her husband Harry, or her swimming and gym routine during pregnancy. The ANSWER also does not mention her concerns about becoming breathless or her family history of miscarriage. The ANSWER does mention a water birth, which is present in the DOCUMENT, but it is not the main focus of the ANSWER. Overall, the ANSWER is a very condensed version of the DOCUMENT and lacks the depth and context provided in the original text.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in the sense that it does not add any new information, but it is not faithful in the sense that it lacks specific details and context.\", \"The ANSWER does not contain any significant omissions or additions that would affect its faithfulness to the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER lacks specific details and quotes from the DOCUMENT.\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention Rebecca's Olympic achievements, her husband Harry, or her swimming and gym routine during pregnancy.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention her concerns about becoming breathless or her family history of miscarriage.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER is a very condensed version of the DOCUMENT and lacks the depth and context provided in the original text.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides a brief summary of the DOCUMENT, but it lacks specific details and quotes from the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does not mention Rebecca's Olympic achievements, her husband Harry, or her swimming and gym routine during pregnancy. The ANSWER also does not mention her concerns about becoming breathless or her family history of miscarriage. The ANSWER does mention a water birth, which is present in the DOCUMENT, but it is not the main focus of the ANSWER. Overall, the ANSWER is a very condensed version of the DOCUMENT and lacks the depth and context provided in the original text.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in the sense that it does not add any new information, but it is not faithful in the sense that it lacks specific details and context.\", \"The ANSWER does not contain any significant omissions or additions that would affect its faithfulness to the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
298
|
{
"_id": 298,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the proposal, including the partner, location, and the presence of white doves.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that the pair met in Perth and live there with their three dogs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Naomi Bass, the correct partner, or the details of the proposal as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT, making it unfaithful to the original content.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>Eamon Sullivan proposed to girlfriend Stephanie Rice</span> (incorrect partner)\", \"<span style='color:red'>The pair were out for an evening walk when he dropped to one knee</span> (incorrect proposal details)\", \"<span style='color:red'>Proposal took place under a cherry blossom tree filled with white doves</span> (incorrect details)\", \"<span style='color:red'>Pair met in Perth in 2011, where they live with their three dogs</span> (incorrect information about Naomi Bass and their relationship)\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the proposal, including the partner, location, and the presence of white doves.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that the pair met in Perth and live there with their three dogs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Naomi Bass, the correct partner, or the details of the proposal as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT, making it unfaithful to the original content.\""
] |
534
|
{
"_id": 534,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Analysis of the ANSWER shows that it does not provide a full summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION. The ANSWER only mentions AP McCoy's final two rides at Sandown and does not mention the rest of the information provided in the DOCUMENT. This lack of information indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER also includes incorrect information, such as AP McCoy's location (Surrey instead of Sandown) and the fact that the Sandown track is completely sold out (this information is not present in the DOCUMENT).\n\nThe ANSWER does mention Andrew Thornton's hopes for the day, which is a point present in the DOCUMENT, but this is not enough to consider the ANSWER faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but this is not enough to outweigh the lack of information and incorrect details.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER fails to provide a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT due to its lack of information and incorrect details.\"\n], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"* The ANSWER does not provide a full summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\"\n\"* The ANSWER includes incorrect information, such as AP McCoy's location and the fact that the Sandown track is completely sold out.\"\n\"* The ANSWER mentions Andrew Thornton's hopes for the day, but this is not enough to consider the ANSWER faithful to the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"Analysis of the ANSWER shows that it does not provide a full summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION. The ANSWER only mentions AP McCoy's final two rides at Sandown and does not mention the rest of the information provided in the DOCUMENT. This lack of information indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER also includes incorrect information, such as AP McCoy's location (Surrey instead of Sandown) and the fact that the Sandown track is completely sold out (this information is not present in the DOCUMENT).\n\nThe ANSWER does mention Andrew Thornton's hopes for the day, which is a point present in the DOCUMENT, but this is not enough to consider the ANSWER faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but this is not enough to outweigh the lack of information and incorrect details.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER fails to provide a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT due to its lack of information and incorrect details.\"\n"
] |
44
|
{
"_id": 44,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide a direct summary of the article as the QUESTION asks. However, it does address the main issue of the DOCUMENT, which is the police use of force and Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. It reiterates the main points discussed in the DOCUMENT, such as the police's narrative of the stop and the legal issues surrounding Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. It sticks to the same analysis and arguments presented in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not introduce new information or contradict existing information.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear answer to the questions posed in the DOCUMENT, but it does address the main issue of the case.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER sticks to the same analysis and arguments presented in the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not introduce new information or contradict existing information.\", \"* The ANSWER does not provide a clear answer to the questions posed in the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not provide a direct summary of the article as the QUESTION asks. However, it does address the main issue of the DOCUMENT, which is the police use of force and Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. It reiterates the main points discussed in the DOCUMENT, such as the police's narrative of the stop and the legal issues surrounding Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. It sticks to the same analysis and arguments presented in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not introduce new information or contradict existing information.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear answer to the questions posed in the DOCUMENT, but it does address the main issue of the case.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\""
] |
394
|
{
"_id": 394,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"A thorough comparison of the ANSWER with the DOCUMENT reveals discrepancies in several key points. \n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Adnan Syed was on trial, whereas the DOCUMENT states that Susan Monica was on trial.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately reports that Monica's former cellmate testified that she signed a birthday card with the phrase 'from the sweetest murderer in Jackson County.' In reality, the DOCUMENT states that a cellmate of Monica's testified that Monica signed the birthday card in accordance with the charges she was facing.\n- The ANSWER misrepresents the circumstances surrounding the remains of the two handymen. In the DOCUMENT, it is stated that the remains were found buried on Monica's farm with signs of being fed on by animals, whereas the ANSWER states that the remains were found with signs that they had been fed on by animals - most likely her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly reports that Monica killed the first man, Stephen Delicino, out of self-defense when he attacked her. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that Monica told investigators that she killed Delicino when she found him being attacked by her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica shot Robert Haney out of mercy when she found him being eaten by her pigs. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica never reported either of their deaths to police. In reality, the DOCUMENT does not mention Monica reporting the deaths to police.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately reports that it took a jury just an hour to convict Monica. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that it took a jury just an hour to convict Monica of killing two handymen and feeding their bodies to her pigs.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"- Incorrect statement about Adnan Syed being on trial (**ANSWER**)\n- Incorrect statement about Monica's former cellmate's testimony (**ANSWER**)\n- Incorrect representation of the remains' discovery (**ANSWER**)\n- Inaccurate representation of Monica's actions regarding Delicino and Haney (**ANSWER**)\n- Incorrect statement about Monica reporting the deaths to police (**ANSWER**)\n- Incorrect statement about the jury's deliberation time (**ANSWER**)\n\"]"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"A thorough comparison of the ANSWER with the DOCUMENT reveals discrepancies in several key points. \n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Adnan Syed was on trial, whereas the DOCUMENT states that Susan Monica was on trial.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately reports that Monica's former cellmate testified that she signed a birthday card with the phrase 'from the sweetest murderer in Jackson County.' In reality, the DOCUMENT states that a cellmate of Monica's testified that Monica signed the birthday card in accordance with the charges she was facing.\n- The ANSWER misrepresents the circumstances surrounding the remains of the two handymen. In the DOCUMENT, it is stated that the remains were found buried on Monica's farm with signs of being fed on by animals, whereas the ANSWER states that the remains were found with signs that they had been fed on by animals - most likely her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly reports that Monica killed the first man, Stephen Delicino, out of self-defense when he attacked her. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that Monica told investigators that she killed Delicino when she found him being attacked by her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica shot Robert Haney out of mercy when she found him being eaten by her pigs. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica never reported either of their deaths to police. In reality, the DOCUMENT does not mention Monica reporting the deaths to police.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately reports that it took a jury just an hour to convict Monica. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that it took a jury just an hour to convict Monica of killing two handymen and feeding their bodies to her pigs.\n\""
] |
235
|
{
"_id": 235,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, the ANSWER does not include any direct quotes from the individuals involved, which are present in the DOCUMENT. This omission may indicate that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER also omits the specific amount of shares purchased (726,707) and the total cost of the purchase (€45million or £32.8m) in favor of a simplified statement of the deal's value (£45m). This simplification may be seen as not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nAdditionally, the ANSWER does not mention the need for two Extraordinary General Meetings (EGMs) to ratify the deal, which is a crucial detail in the DOCUMENT. This omission may also be seen as not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nHowever, the ANSWER does accurately convey the main points of the DEAL itself, such as the percentage of ownership (20%) and the hope for the deal to develop the club in Asia. This suggests that the ANSWER is at least partially faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT due to the omissions of specific details and direct quotes.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"* The ANSWER omits direct quotes from individuals involved in the deal.\", \n\"* The ANSWER omits specific details about the purchase (number of shares, total cost).\", \n\"* The ANSWER omits the need for two EGMs to ratify the deal.\", \n\"* The ANSWER simplifies the deal's value to £45m without specifying the currency (€45million or £32.8m).\""
}
|
FAIL
| null |
445
|
{
"_id": 445,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Lisa Courtney holds the Guinness World Record for the largest collection, not the US News Record, so the answer contains incorrect information. \nThe answer mentions that Lisa started amassing items after being bullied at age 9, but the DOCUMENT states she started collecting at age 9 when she saw a picture of Pikachu in a Nintendo magazine, and there's no mention of bullying at that time. \nThe answer states that Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet, which is correct, but the DOCUMENT also mentions that she visits car-boot sales and tries to save money, so the answer oversimplifies her online activities. \nThe answer highlights Lisa's vast hoard, but the DOCUMENT only mentions that her collection ranges from cuddly toys to models, clothing, badges, flannels, and posters, without mentioning cornflakes made in Japan.\"\n],\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Lisa Courtney holds the Guinness World Record for largest collection (incorrect information) \",\n\"Lisa started amassing items after being bullied at age 9 (inaccurate context) \",\n\"Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet (oversimplifies her online activities) \",\n\"Lisa's vast hoard ranges from cuddly toys to cornflakes made in Japan (incorrect information)\""
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"Lisa Courtney holds the Guinness World Record for the largest collection, not the US News Record, so the answer contains incorrect information. \nThe answer mentions that Lisa started amassing items after being bullied at age 9, but the DOCUMENT states she started collecting at age 9 when she saw a picture of Pikachu in a Nintendo magazine, and there's no mention of bullying at that time. \nThe answer states that Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet, which is correct, but the DOCUMENT also mentions that she visits car-boot sales and tries to save money, so the answer oversimplifies her online activities. \nThe answer highlights Lisa's vast hoard, but the DOCUMENT only mentions that her collection ranges from cuddly toys to models, clothing, badges, flannels, and posters, without mentioning cornflakes made in Japan.\"\n"
] |
426
|
{
"_id": 426,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER provides some information from the DOCUMENT, but it does not fully capture the essence of the content. The ANSWER does not mention Brendan Rodgers' views on the team's chances of qualifying for the Champions League next season, which is a key point from the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER also does not mention the FA Cup and its importance for the team, which is a crucial aspect of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does not mention the Liverpool manager's views on Sterling's potential and the job of his advisors to look at possibilities beyond the club, which is an important point from the DOCUMENT.\n\nHowever, the ANSWER does correctly state that Raheem Sterling won a penalty for Liverpool and that the team lost 4-1 to Arsenal. The ANSWER also correctly mentions that Sterling turned down a new £100,000-a-week deal.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER provides some information from the DOCUMENT, but it is not a faithful summary of the content.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n* The ANSWER does not mention Brendan Rodgers' views on the team's chances of qualifying for the Champions League next season.\n* The ANSWER does not mention the FA Cup and its importance for the team.\n* The ANSWER does not mention the Liverpool manager's views on Sterling's potential and the job of his advisors to look at possibilities beyond the club.\n* The ANSWER correctly states that Raheem Sterling won a penalty for Liverpool and that the team lost 4-1 to Arsenal.\n* The ANSWER correctly mentions that Sterling turned down a new £100,000-a-week deal."
}
|
FAIL
| null |
361
|
{
"_id": 361,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the suite's cost, which is a key piece of information in the DOCUMENT. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's location, which is explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT as being in Los Angeles. This inaccuracy further indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER mentions the suite's size, but the DOCUMENT states that the suite is the largest in Los Angeles, not the largest in LA. This minor discrepancy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's private outdoor roof space, which is a notable feature of the suite. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's design inspiration, which is explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT as being inspired by Vivienne Westwood. This inaccuracy indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's features, such as the master bedroom suite, the media room, or the dining room, which are all explicitly described in the DOCUMENT. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the exclusive shopping hour, which is a feature of the suite. However, this is not a unique or exclusive feature of the ANSWER, as it is also mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's designer, Vivienne Westwood, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's opening date, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's location, but the DOCUMENT states that it is in Los Angeles, not The London West Hollywood. This inaccuracy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's size, but the DOCUMENT states that the suite is the largest in Los Angeles, not the largest in LA. This minor discrepancy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's design inspiration, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's features, such as the master bedroom suite, the media room, or the dining room, which are all explicitly described in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the exclusive shopping hour, which is a feature of the suite.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's designer, Vivienne Westwood, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's opening date, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [ \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the suite's cost, which is"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the suite's cost, which is a key piece of information in the DOCUMENT. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's location, which is explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT as being in Los Angeles. This inaccuracy further indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER mentions the suite's size, but the DOCUMENT states that the suite is the largest in Los Angeles, not the largest in LA. This minor discrepancy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's private outdoor roof space, which is a notable feature of the suite. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's design inspiration, which is explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT as being inspired by Vivienne Westwood. This inaccuracy indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's features, such as the master bedroom suite, the media room, or the dining room, which are all explicitly described in the DOCUMENT. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the exclusive shopping hour, which is a feature of the suite. However, this is not a unique or exclusive feature of the ANSWER, as it is also mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's designer, Vivienne Westwood, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's opening date, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's location, but the DOCUMENT states that it is in Los Angeles, not The London West Hollywood. This inaccuracy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's size, but the DOCUMENT states that the suite is the largest in Los Angeles, not the largest in LA. This minor discrepancy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's design inspiration, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's features, such as the master bedroom suite, the media room, or the dining room, which are all explicitly described in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the exclusive shopping hour, which is a feature of the suite.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's designer, Vivienne Westwood, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's opening date, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\n\""
] |
527
|
{
"_id": 527,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER contains new information not present in the DOCUMENT, specifically the price of £280,000 which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states the price of the cel, when the DOCUMENT states it will fetch more than £10,000.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the content of the DOCUMENT, as it does not mention the handwritten notes, the animation team, or the rarity of colour model cels.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear connection between the cel and the Band Concert, as the DOCUMENT does not mention this.\", \"The ANSWER fails to mention the sale taking place in Dallas, Texas, which is a key point in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"£280,000\", \"The Band Concert\", \"Dallas, Texas\", \"handwritten notes\", \"animation team\", \"colour model cels\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER contains new information not present in the DOCUMENT, specifically the price of £280,000 which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states the price of the cel, when the DOCUMENT states it will fetch more than £10,000.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the content of the DOCUMENT, as it does not mention the handwritten notes, the animation team, or the rarity of colour model cels.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear connection between the cel and the Band Concert, as the DOCUMENT does not mention this.\", \"The ANSWER fails to mention the sale taking place in Dallas, Texas, which is a key point in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
137
|
{
"_id": 137,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Analyze the ANSWER to see if it provides new information not present in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER mentions a 'phenomenon formed of three separate double rainbows', whereas the DOCUMENT states that the quadruple rainbow is'made of two pairs next to each other'.\",\n\"The ANSWER also states that the image was taken in a split second while Amanda Curtis was waiting for her train, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\"]\n,\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER mentions a 'phenomenon formed of three separate double rainbows', whereas the DOCUMENT states that the quadruple rainbow is'made of two pairs next to each other'\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Analyze the ANSWER to see if it provides new information not present in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER mentions a 'phenomenon formed of three separate double rainbows', whereas the DOCUMENT states that the quadruple rainbow is'made of two pairs next to each other'.\",\n\"The ANSWER also states that the image was taken in a split second while Amanda Curtis was waiting for her train, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
218
|
{
"_id": 218,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information regarding Mike Ford joining Bath. The DOCUMENT states that Mike Ford is the head coach of Bath, but it does not mention him joining the club. \nThe ANSWER also contains incorrect information regarding the location of the game where Williams helped England win. The DOCUMENT states that Williams helped England win the Tokyo Sevens, but the ANSWER contains 'Toyko' which seems to be a typo or incorrect spelling.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any information about Williams' playing stint in France, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' father being English, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' playing stint with the Hamiltons club in Cape Town, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' experience with the sevens programme, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention England Sevens head coach Simon Amor's comments about Williams, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention that Williams scored 36 tries on the World Series circuit, which is correct according to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention that Williams helped England win the Tokyo Sevens, which is correct according to the DOCUMENT.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information regarding Mike Ford joining Bath.\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains incorrect information regarding the location of the game where Williams helped England win.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not provide information about Williams' father being English.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not provide information about Williams' playing stint with the Hamiltons club in Cape Town.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not provide information about Williams' experience with the sevens programme.</span>\", \"<span style='color: green'>The ANSWER does mention that Williams scored 36 tries on the World Series circuit.</span>\", \"<span style='color: green'>The ANSWER does mention that Williams helped England win the Tokyo Sevens.</span>\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information regarding Mike Ford joining Bath. The DOCUMENT states that Mike Ford is the head coach of Bath, but it does not mention him joining the club. \nThe ANSWER also contains incorrect information regarding the location of the game where Williams helped England win. The DOCUMENT states that Williams helped England win the Tokyo Sevens, but the ANSWER contains 'Toyko' which seems to be a typo or incorrect spelling.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any information about Williams' playing stint in France, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' father being English, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' playing stint with the Hamiltons club in Cape Town, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' experience with the sevens programme, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention England Sevens head coach Simon Amor's comments about Williams, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention that Williams scored 36 tries on the World Series circuit, which is correct according to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention that Williams helped England win the Tokyo Sevens, which is correct according to the DOCUMENT.\n\""
] |
67
|
{
"_id": 67,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it summarizes the main points of the story, including Christine's passing, the missing diamond engagement ring, and the family's appeal for its return.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide the exact date of Christine's passing as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"Additionally, the ANSWER does not mention the specific nursing home where Christine lived as the DOCUMENT does.\", \"The ANSWER also omits some details such as the length of time the family tried to remove the ring and the reaction of the nurses.\", \"Despite these minor omissions, the ANSWER remains faithful to the overall content of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not introduce any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a concise summary of the story without adding any new information or contradicting the facts presented in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide the exact date of Christine's passing.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the specific nursing home where Christine lived.\", \"The ANSWER omits some details such as the length of time the family tried to remove the ring and the reaction of the nurses.\", \"The ANSWER does not introduce any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\"] }"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it summarizes the main points of the story, including Christine's passing, the missing diamond engagement ring, and the family's appeal for its return.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide the exact date of Christine's passing as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"Additionally, the ANSWER does not mention the specific nursing home where Christine lived as the DOCUMENT does.\", \"The ANSWER also omits some details such as the length of time the family tried to remove the ring and the reaction of the nurses.\", \"Despite these minor omissions, the ANSWER remains faithful to the overall content of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not introduce any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a concise summary of the story without adding any new information or contradicting the facts presented in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
422
|
{
"_id": 422,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Brendan Rodgers' statement about Raheem Sterling being a 'big part' of the team's performance despite the loss is not present in the ANSWER. The ANSWER only mentions Sterling's starting position in the second half penalty and his interview with the BBC, which is not a direct quote from Rodgers. The ANSWER does not mention the reaction of the players, the team's form, or the manager's doubts about the team's chances of making the top four. The ANSWER also omits the manager's statement about Sterling's potential and the job of his advisors to explore possibilities beyond Liverpool. The ANSWER does mention the outcome of the game and the points gap, but this information is already present in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not provide a faithful summary of the article. The ANSWER does not capture the full context and nuances of Rodgers' statements, which are crucial to understanding the situation.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not provide any new information beyond what is already present in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only repeats existing facts without adding any depth or analysis.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"<span style='background-color: yellow;'>Lack of context and nuances</span>: The ANSWER does not capture the full context and nuances of Rodgers' statements, which are crucial to understanding the situation.\",\n\"<span style='background-color: yellow;'>Omission of key information</span>: The ANSWER omits the reaction of the players, the team's form, and the manager's doubts about the team's chances of making the top four.\",\n\"<span style='background-color: yellow;'>Repetition of existing facts</span>: The ANSWER only repeats existing facts without adding any depth or analysis.\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"Brendan Rodgers' statement about Raheem Sterling being a 'big part' of the team's performance despite the loss is not present in the ANSWER. The ANSWER only mentions Sterling's starting position in the second half penalty and his interview with the BBC, which is not a direct quote from Rodgers. The ANSWER does not mention the reaction of the players, the team's form, or the manager's doubts about the team's chances of making the top four. The ANSWER also omits the manager's statement about Sterling's potential and the job of his advisors to explore possibilities beyond Liverpool. The ANSWER does mention the outcome of the game and the points gap, but this information is already present in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not provide a faithful summary of the article. The ANSWER does not capture the full context and nuances of Rodgers' statements, which are crucial to understanding the situation.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not provide any new information beyond what is already present in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only repeats existing facts without adding any depth or analysis.\""
] |
365
|
{
"_id": 365,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, we can see that the ANSWER is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. However, there are some minor omissions and inaccuracies.\",\n\" The ANSWER does not mention the suite's price ($25,000 a night), the hotel's renovation project, or the suite's location (11,000 square feet with two levels), which are all mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" The ANSWER also does not mention the master bedroom suite's features, such as the four poster bed, tapestry, and mirrored dressing room, which are described in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" The ANSWER does not mention the rooftop terrace's capacity (up to 300 people) or the private outdoor space's size (5,000 square feet), which are both mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" On the other hand, the ANSWER does correctly mention the suite's opening date (May), the English designer's involvement, and the exclusive shopping hour at Westwood's store.\",\n\" Overall, the ANSWER provides a basic summary of the Vivienne Westwood suite, but it lacks some essential details and fails to mention some key features of the suite.\",\n\" Despite these inaccuracies, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" Therefore, the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT, but it does not contain any major errors or contradictions.\",\n\" However, given the importance of accuracy and completeness, the ANSWER is still considered 'FAIL'.\"],\n\"SCORE\": 2,\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the suite's price ($25,000 a night), the hotel's renovation project, or the suite's location (11,000 square feet with two levels).\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the master bedroom suite's features, such as the four poster bed, tapestry, and mirrored dressing room.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the rooftop terrace's capacity (up to 300 people) or the private outdoor space's size (5,000 square feet).\"]"
}
|
2
|
[
"\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, we can see that the ANSWER is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. However, there are some minor omissions and inaccuracies.\",\n\" The ANSWER does not mention the suite's price ($25,000 a night), the hotel's renovation project, or the suite's location (11,000 square feet with two levels), which are all mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" The ANSWER also does not mention the master bedroom suite's features, such as the four poster bed, tapestry, and mirrored dressing room, which are described in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" The ANSWER does not mention the rooftop terrace's capacity (up to 300 people) or the private outdoor space's size (5,000 square feet), which are both mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" On the other hand, the ANSWER does correctly mention the suite's opening date (May), the English designer's involvement, and the exclusive shopping hour at Westwood's store.\",\n\" Overall, the ANSWER provides a basic summary of the Vivienne Westwood suite, but it lacks some essential details and fails to mention some key features of the suite.\",\n\" Despite these inaccuracies, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" Therefore, the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT, but it does not contain any major errors or contradictions.\",\n\" However, given the importance of accuracy and completeness, the ANSWER is still considered 'FAIL'.\""
] |
281
|
{
"_id": 281,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Susie Burrell or her top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the nutritional values of the breads listed in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not include any specific examples of breads as in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any quotes from Susie Burrell or Helen Bond.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the glycaemic index (GI) or its implications.\", \"The ANSWER does not discuss the trend of cutting out whole food groups.\", \"The ANSWER does not discuss the potential risks of cutting out whole food groups.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the British Dietetic Association or its spokesperson Helen Bond.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any examples of the five most nutritious or least nutritious breads.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any specific examples of the worst breads as listed in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention Susie Burrell or her top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the nutritional values of the breads listed in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not provide any specific examples of breads as in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not provide any quotes from Susie Burrell or Helen Bond.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not discuss the trend of cutting out whole food groups.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not discuss the potential risks of cutting out whole food groups.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the British Dietetic Association or its spokesperson Helen Bond.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not provide any examples of the five most nutritious or least nutritious breads.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not provide any specific examples of the worst breads as listed in the DOCUMENT.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Susie Burrell or her top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the nutritional values of the breads listed in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not include any specific examples of breads as in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any quotes from Susie Burrell or Helen Bond.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the glycaemic index (GI) or its implications.\", \"The ANSWER does not discuss the trend of cutting out whole food groups.\", \"The ANSWER does not discuss the potential risks of cutting out whole food groups.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the British Dietetic Association or its spokesperson Helen Bond.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any examples of the five most nutritious or least nutritious breads.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any specific examples of the worst breads as listed in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
716
|
{
"_id": 716,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The answer does not mention the name of the book that Bunkie King wrote, 'Somebody I Used to Know: Love, Loss and Jack Thompson'. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the 1975 movie Scobie Malone, which Bunkie King appeared in with Jack Thompson. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the salacious details of Bunkie King's 15-year affair with Jack Thompson. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the unconventional arrangement of the three-way relationship between Bunkie King, Jack Thompson, and Leona. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention Bunkie King's feelings of jealousy and problems caused by the relationship. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention Bunkie King's revelation about her drug use, ranging from marijuana to acid to heroin. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Bunkie King struggled to dampen her feelings for Jack Thompson despite her sister catching them kissing. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Jack Thompson felt 'like a bone being fought over by two dogs' when referring to his relationship with Bunkie King and Leona. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Bunkie King fled Spain due to a serious showdown. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention Bunkie King's current life, including her work in nursing and her divorced status. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention Leona's current life, including her relationship with Jack Thompson and their son Billy. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Jack Thompson was catapulted to sex symbol status overnight due to a pose emulating Titian's Venus d'Urbino. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Bunkie King underwent three terminations due to pregnancy. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Bunkie King was a virgin and struggled to dampen her feelings for Jack Thompson. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Leona did not know about Bunkie King's regular afternoon visits from Thompson at their mother's house. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Bunkie King felt bad for Leona and did not know how to give Jack Thompson up. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Thompson and Leona are still in a relationship and live in regional NSW. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \""
}
| null | null |
227
|
{
"_id": 227,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Jamie O'Hara scored from the penalty spot, not Christiano Ronaldo, so the answer contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The answer incorrectly states that Blackpool fans protested against owners, the Oyston family, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that the protesters were against the Oyston family's handling of the club, not the owners themselves.\",\n\"The answer inaccurately states that the Seasiders need two more points to pass Stockport's 26 points, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that the Seasiders are on 25 points and need one more point to be the lowest points tally ever accumulated by a team in the second tier.\",\n\"Blackpool fans gathered outside Bloomfield Road to protest against the Oyston family, not against the owners, the Oyston family.\",\n\"Blackpool's main reception at Bloomfield Road was pelted with eggs before their game with Reading, not the Seasiders need two more points to pass Stockport's 26\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>Jamie O'Hara scored from the penalty spot after just six minutes, but Christiano Ronaldo was not mentioned in the DOCUMENT</span>.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The answer incorrectly states that Blackpool fans protested against owners, the Oyston family, when in fact the protesters were against the Oyston family's handling of the club</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The Seasiders need two more points to pass Stockport's 26, which is an inaccurate statement based on the DOCUMENT</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Blackpool fans gathered outside Bloomfield Road to protest against the Oyston family, not against the owners, the Oyston family</span>.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"Jamie O'Hara scored from the penalty spot, not Christiano Ronaldo, so the answer contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The answer incorrectly states that Blackpool fans protested against owners, the Oyston family, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that the protesters were against the Oyston family's handling of the club, not the owners themselves.\",\n\"The answer inaccurately states that the Seasiders need two more points to pass Stockport's 26 points, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that the Seasiders are on 25 points and need one more point to be the lowest points tally ever accumulated by a team in the second tier.\",\n\"Blackpool fans gathered outside Bloomfield Road to protest against the Oyston family, not against the owners, the Oyston family.\",\n\"Blackpool's main reception at Bloomfield Road was pelted with eggs before their game with Reading, not the Seasiders need two more points to pass Stockport's 26\""
] |
481
|
{
"_id": 481,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it summarizes the main points discussed in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER contains an error in the gender of Raheem Sterling.\", \"The ANSWER also contains an error in the information provided about the contract offer.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains an error in the gender of Raheem Sterling ('She' instead of 'He')</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains an error in the information provided about the contract offer (it mentions a £100,000-a-week contract for Sterling to stay, but the DOCUMENT states that Sterling turned down a new deal)</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it summarizes the main points discussed in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER contains an error in the gender of Raheem Sterling.\", \"The ANSWER also contains an error in the information provided about the contract offer.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
168
|
{
"_id": 168,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\n \"REASONING\": [\n \"The ANSWER does not accurately summarize the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that MH17 was shot down, not that it was downed.\",\n \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that 305 people were killed on board MH17, when in fact it was 298.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the recovery of personal possessions, including jewellery, from the crash site, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch-led team's efforts to clear the site, return items to bereaved families, and bring those responsible to justice, as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\"\n ],\n \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n \"<span style='color:red'>MH17 was shot down, not downed</span>\",\n \"<span style='color:red'>Incorrect number of fatalities</span>\",\n \"<span style='color:red'>Missing recovery of personal possessions</span>\",\n \"<span style='color:red'>Missing details on site clearing efforts</span>\"\n ]\n}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n \"The ANSWER does not accurately summarize the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that MH17 was shot down, not that it was downed.\",\n \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that 305 people were killed on board MH17, when in fact it was 298.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the recovery of personal possessions, including jewellery, from the crash site, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch-led team's efforts to clear the site, return items to bereaved families, and bring those responsible to justice, as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\"\n "
] |
833
|
{
"_id": 833,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not summarize the article as requested.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the specific examples of breads provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Susie Burrell's views on the nutritional value of white and wholegrain bread.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential health risks of cutting out entire food groups.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the British Dietetic Association's spokesperson, Helen Bond.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the glycaemic index (GI) and its impact on glucose release into the bloodstream.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the recommended daily intake of carbohydrates.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the recommended daily intake of carbohydrates.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the recommended daily intake of carbohydrates.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on energy levels, mood, and concentration.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on gut health.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on weight gain.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the worst nutritionally breads listed by Susie Burrell.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the best nutritionally breads listed by Susie Burrell.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the British Dietetic Association's spokesperson, Helen Bond.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on exercise performance.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on brain function.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the importance of choosing wholegrain bread over white bread.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the importance of choosing less processed foods with more protein.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the importance of being mindful of portion sizes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the importance of serving children wholegrain bread.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the importance of being cautious of the bread served to children.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the long-term effects of cutting out entire food groups.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on overall health.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on weight loss.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on overall health.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on overall health.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on overall health.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on overall health.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on overall health.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on overall health.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the potential negative effects of cutting out carbs on overall"
}
| null | null |
368
|
{
"_id": 368,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not provide a detailed summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION. Instead, it offers a very brief overview of the situation at Newcastle United, focusing on the protests against Mike Ashley and the need for the club to address off-field problems. The ANSWER does not include information about the team's performance, the manager's comments, or the fans' planned protests outside Sports Direct stores. The ANSWER also does not mention the £34million sitting in the club's bank, which is an important point mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in the sense that it mentions the protests against Mike Ashley and the need for the club to address off-field problems. However, it is not faithful in the sense that it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article and omits important details.\n\nThe ANSWER is also not contradictory to the DOCUMENT, as it does not introduce new information that would contradict the existing information in the DOCUMENT.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT, as it does not provide a detailed summary of the article and omits important details.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide a detailed summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \n\"Instead, it offers a very brief overview of the situation at Newcastle United, focusing on the protests against Mike Ashley and the need for the club to address off-field problems.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not include information about the team's performance, the manager's comments, or the fans' planned protests outside Sports Direct stores.\", \n\"The ANSWER also does not mention the £34million sitting in the club's bank, which is an important point mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in the sense that it mentions the protests against Mike Ashley and the need for the club to address off-field problems.\", \n\"The ANSWER is also not contradictory to the DOCUMENT, as it does not introduce new information that would contradict the existing information in the DOCUMENT.\"]}}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not provide a detailed summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION. Instead, it offers a very brief overview of the situation at Newcastle United, focusing on the protests against Mike Ashley and the need for the club to address off-field problems. The ANSWER does not include information about the team's performance, the manager's comments, or the fans' planned protests outside Sports Direct stores. The ANSWER also does not mention the £34million sitting in the club's bank, which is an important point mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in the sense that it mentions the protests against Mike Ashley and the need for the club to address off-field problems. However, it is not faithful in the sense that it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article and omits important details.\n\nThe ANSWER is also not contradictory to the DOCUMENT, as it does not introduce new information that would contradict the existing information in the DOCUMENT.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT, as it does not provide a detailed summary of the article and omits important details.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide a detailed summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \n\"Instead, it offers a very brief overview of the situation at Newcastle United, focusing on the protests against Mike Ashley and the need for the club to address off-field problems.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not include information about the team's performance, the manager's comments, or the fans' planned protests outside Sports Direct stores.\", \n\"The ANSWER also does not mention the £34million sitting in the club's bank, which is an important point mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in the sense that it mentions the protests against Mike Ashley and the need for the club to address off-field problems.\", \n\"The ANSWER is also not contradictory to the DOCUMENT, as it does not introduce new information that would contradict the existing information in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
884
|
{
"_id": 884,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not contain the entire information from the DOCUMENT, but it does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT either.\", \"The ANSWER only provides a brief summary of the content of the DOCUMENT and does not include any new information beyond the context provided.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the names of the people involved in the restoration of the B&B and their home, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does mention the restoration of a 1940s airfield control tower, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the £400 spent on a 1940s loo or the £10,000 spent on converting Emma Edwards' home into a 50s haven, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does mention the 1950s and 1960s, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Ursula Forbush's charity work or her love for the late 1960s, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does mention that the people involved like to come home to their restored homes and switch on old TVs, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the £400 spent on a 1940s loo.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the £10,000 spent on converting Emma Edwards' home into a 50s haven.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Ursula Forbush's charity work.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the restoration of a 1940s airfield control tower in Norfolk.\", \"The ANSWER does mention the restoration of a 1940s airfield control tower, but only briefly.\", \"The ANSWER does mention the 1950s and 1960s.\", \"The ANSWER does mention that the people involved like to come home to their restored homes and switch on old TVs.\"]"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not contain the entire information from the DOCUMENT, but it does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT either.\", \"The ANSWER only provides a brief summary of the content of the DOCUMENT and does not include any new information beyond the context provided.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the names of the people involved in the restoration of the B&B and their home, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does mention the restoration of a 1940s airfield control tower, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the £400 spent on a 1940s loo or the £10,000 spent on converting Emma Edwards' home into a 50s haven, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does mention the 1950s and 1960s, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Ursula Forbush's charity work or her love for the late 1960s, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does mention that the people involved like to come home to their restored homes and switch on old TVs, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
296
|
{
"_id": 296,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER seems faithful to the DOCUMENT, but there are a few minor discrepancies.\", \"The ANSWER states the couple met in 2012, whereas the DOCUMENT states they met in 2011.\", \"The ANSWER also states the pair lives with three dogs, whereas the DOCUMENT does not mention the number of dogs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the details of the proposal as thoroughly as the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does accurately capture the main elements of the proposal, including the location and the fact that it took place under a cherry blossom tree.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER states the couple met in 2012, which is incorrect (highlight span: 'Pair met in Perth in 2012, where they live with their three dogs.')\", \"* The ANSWER states the pair lives with three dogs, which is incorrect (highlight span: 'Pair met in Perth in 2012, where they live with their three dogs.')\"] }"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER seems faithful to the DOCUMENT, but there are a few minor discrepancies.\", \"The ANSWER states the couple met in 2012, whereas the DOCUMENT states they met in 2011.\", \"The ANSWER also states the pair lives with three dogs, whereas the DOCUMENT does not mention the number of dogs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the details of the proposal as thoroughly as the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does accurately capture the main elements of the proposal, including the location and the fact that it took place under a cherry blossom tree.\""
] |
139
|
{
"_id": 139,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not include Amanda Curtis' name, which is a key piece of information from the DOCUMENT.\",\n \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the phenomenon is formed of two separate double rainbows, when the DOCUMENT describes it as two pairs of double rainbows next to each other.\",\n \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the phenomenon was seen at the Weather Channel station, when the DOCUMENT states that it was seen at the Glen Cove LIRR station.\"\n], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n \"<span style='color: red'>Phenomenon formed of two separate double rainbows</span> - incorrect information from the DOCUMENT\",\n \"<span style='color: red'>Fashion entrepreneur Amanda Curtis saw it at Weather Channel station</span> - incorrect information from the DOCUMENT\",\n \"<span style='color: red'>Two separate double rainbows</span> - incorrect information from the DOCUMENT\",\n \"<span style='color: red'>Weather Channel station</span> - incorrect information from the DOCUMENT\"\n]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not include Amanda Curtis' name, which is a key piece of information from the DOCUMENT.\",\n \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the phenomenon is formed of two separate double rainbows, when the DOCUMENT describes it as two pairs of double rainbows next to each other.\",\n \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the phenomenon was seen at the Weather Channel station, when the DOCUMENT states that it was seen at the Glen Cove LIRR station.\"\n"
] |
820
|
{
"_id": 820,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides a summary of the DOCUMENT, but some details have been altered or omitted.\", \"The ANSWER mentions a 'winter spree', which is not present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER states that the total expenditure would hit £300m, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER quotes Phil Neville, who is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Moshin Tanveer's Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy or the 'Dream Day' event.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the reaction of the Manchester United manager, Louis van Gaal, to the fan's advice.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fan's request to not sign Radamel Falcao permanently.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fan's suggestion to sell Robin van Persie.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Manchester United fan's age or the'mentor' who accompanied him.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Manchester Foundation Dream Day held at the Aon Training Complex.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Barclays Premier League title.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the club's current position in the Barclays Premier League.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the trip to face Everton at Goodison Park.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the names of the players in the correct order as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the reaction of Louis van Gaal when he reads out the names of the players.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fan's excitement and happiness.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fan's request to not sign Radamel Falcao permanently.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fan's suggestion to sell Robin van Persie.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Manchester Foundation Dream Day held at the Aon Training Complex.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Barclays Premier League title.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the club's current position in the Barclays Premier League.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the trip to face Everton at Goodison Park.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the reaction of Louis van Gaal when he reads out the names of the players.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fan's excitement and happiness.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fan's request to not sign Radamel Falcao permanently.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fan's suggestion to sell Robin van Persie.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Manchester Foundation Dream Day held at the Aon Training Complex.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Barclays Premier League title.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the club's current position in the Barclays Premier League.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the trip to face Everton at Goodison Park.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the reaction of Louis van Gaal when he reads out the names of the players.\", \""
}
| null | null |
558
|
{
"_id": 558,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the key theme of'scoring surge' which is a crucial aspect of Leicester's revival as described in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER also does not mention 'cambiasso class' which is a significant point made in the DOCUMENT. \nAdditionally, the ANSWER does not mention'scheichel sensational' which is a crucial point about the team's form. \nThe ANSWER does mention 'leicester have recorded four consecutive premier league wins' but it does not provide the full context as in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does mention 'nigel pearson's side are starting to dream of beating relegation' which is a point made in the DOCUMENT but it does not capture the full essence of the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does mention 'esteban cambiasso has been superb for the foxes this season' but it does not provide the full context as in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does mention 'goalkeeper kasper schmeichel has also hit some timely form' which is a point made in the DOCUMENT but it does not capture the full essence of the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT and does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT as it misses several crucial points and does not provide the full context.\", \n\"Although the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, it fails to capture the full essence of the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"Key omissions in the ANSWER include'scoring surge', 'cambiasso class', and'scheichel sensational'.\", \n\"Key points in the ANSWER include 'leicester have recorded four consecutive premier league wins', 'nigel pearson's side are starting to dream of beating relegation', 'esteban cambiasso has been superb for the foxes this season', and 'goalkeeper kasper schmeichel has also hit some timely form'.\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"\\\"scoring surge\\\" (missing from ANSWER) [\\\"The ANSWER does not mention'scoring surge' which is a crucial aspect of Leicester's revival as described in the DOCUMENT.\\\"]\", \n\\\"cambiasso class\\\" (missing from ANSWER) [\\\"The ANSWER does not mention 'cambiasso class' which is a significant point made in the DOCUMENT.\\\"]\", \n\\\"scheichel sensational\\\" (missing from ANSWER) [\\\"The ANSWER does not mention'scheichel sensational' which is a crucial point about the team's form.\\\"]\", \n\"\\\"leicester have recorded four consecutive premier league wins\\\" (ANSWER) [\\\"The ANSWER does mention 'leicester have recorded four consecutive premier league wins' but it does not"
}
| null |
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the key theme of'scoring surge' which is a crucial aspect of Leicester's revival as described in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER also does not mention 'cambiasso class' which is a significant point made in the DOCUMENT. \nAdditionally, the ANSWER does not mention'scheichel sensational' which is a crucial point about the team's form. \nThe ANSWER does mention 'leicester have recorded four consecutive premier league wins' but it does not provide the full context as in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does mention 'nigel pearson's side are starting to dream of beating relegation' which is a point made in the DOCUMENT but it does not capture the full essence of the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does mention 'esteban cambiasso has been superb for the foxes this season' but it does not provide the full context as in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does mention 'goalkeeper kasper schmeichel has also hit some timely form' which is a point made in the DOCUMENT but it does not capture the full essence of the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT and does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT as it misses several crucial points and does not provide the full context.\", \n\"Although the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, it fails to capture the full essence of the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"Key omissions in the ANSWER include'scoring surge",
"cambiasso class', and'scheichel sensational'.\", \n\"Key points in the ANSWER include 'leicester have recorded four consecutive premier league wins",
"nigel pearson's side are starting to dream of beating relegation",
"esteban cambiasso has been superb for the foxes this season', and 'goalkeeper kasper schmeichel has also hit some timely form'.\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"\\\"scoring surge\\\" (missing from ANSWER) [\\\"The ANSWER does not mention'scoring surge' which is a crucial aspect of Leicester's revival as described in the DOCUMENT.\\\""
] |
210
|
{
"_id": 210,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Overall, the ANSWER does not fully capture the context and details of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER is very brief and lacks specific information about the 'hot-or-not' videos, their impact, and the effects on the children involved. \n\nThe ANSWER does not mention the girls' names, the classroom setting, or the video's content beyond the title. It also does not address the potential long-term effects of such bullying, the role of social media, or the parents' responsibilities.\n\nThe ANSWER also fails to mention the author's warnings about the devastating impact on the children's self-esteem, grades, and overall well-being. \n\nThe ANSWER does not fully convey the severity of the issue and its potential consequences, making it seem less serious than the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article's main points or themes, which are central to the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER does not capture the author's tone or the emotional impact of the issue, which is evident in the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER does not mention the author's expertise or the research that supports the claims made in the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear call to action or a conclusion, which is present in the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER does not fully address the question asked in the QUESTION, which is to summarize the article. \n\nThe ANSWER does not capture the author's concern for the next generation and the need for parents to help spread a message of acceptance and self-acceptance. \n\nThe ANSWER does not mention the different reasons why this new form of bullying is starting, such as puberty and middle-class values. \n\nThe ANSWER does not mention the different perspectives and comments from viewers, which are present in the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER does not mention the potential for change and the glimmer of hope mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER does not mention the author's book or the charity that conducted the survey, which is present in the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER does not capture the overall tone of the DOCUMENT, which is one of concern, warning, and hope. \n\nThe ANSWER does not fully convey the complexity of the issue and the need for a nuanced approach to addressing it. \n\nThe ANSWER does not mention the different types of media platforms where these videos are being shared, such as YouTube and Facebook. \n\nThe ANSWER does not capture the emotional impact of the issue on the children involved, which is evident in the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER does not mention the different experts and researchers who support the author's claims, such as Rachel Simmons and Rosalind Wiseman. \n\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article's main points or themes, which are central to the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER does not capture the author's concern for the next generation and the need for parents to help spread a message of acceptance and self-acceptance."
}
| null | null |
66
|
{
"_id": 66,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not provide the location where the woman was struck by lightning. The DOCUMENT states that the woman was struck in her car, but the location is not specified. However, the ANSWER mentions that the strike occurred in Boston, Lincolnshire, which is incorrect. The correct location is not specified in the DOCUMENT, but it is mentioned that the hospital where the doctor works is in Boston, England, not Lincolnshire. The ANSWER also does not mention the doctor's colleague, Dr. Permesh Dhillon, who is quoted in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only provides a brief summary of the event and the treatment, but it does not include the doctor's quote or the correct location of the hospital. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information in the DOCUMENT, but it does not provide the correct location of the hospital or the doctor's colleague. \nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. It only provides a brief summary of the event and the treatment. \nThe ANSWER is faithful to the general content of the DOCUMENT, but it contains incorrect information. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it is not entirely faithful to the content. \nThe ANSWER is faithful to the general content of the DOCUMENT, but it contains incorrect information and is missing some details. \nThe ANSWER is faithful to the general content of the DOCUMENT, but it contains incorrect information and is missing some details. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it is not entirely faithful to the content. \nThe ANSWER is faithful to the general content of the DOCUMENT, but it contains incorrect information and is missing some details. \nThe ANSWER is faithful to the general content of the DOCUMENT, but it contains incorrect information and is missing some details. \nThe ANSWER is faithful to the general content of the DOCUMENT, but it contains incorrect information and is missing some details. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it is not entirely faithful to the content. \nThe ANSWER is faithful to the general content of the DOCUMENT, but it contains incorrect information and is missing some details. \nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSW"
}
| null | null |
589
|
{
"_id": 589,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER partially summarizes the DOCUMENT, but it misses some crucial information and context.\", \"The ANSWER does not fully capture the extent of the problem, as stated in the DOCUMENT (\\\"one in every 12 truckies tested positive for drugs while out on the road\\\").\", \"The ANSWER also does not mention the use of secretive codes over radio systems, which is a significant aspect of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER fails to mention Inspector Bernie Rankin's statement that one in 12 heavy vehicle drivers test positive for drugs when pulled over.\", \"The ANSWER also omits the fact that drivers are using their log books to roll out lines and smoke ice.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Simon Green's statement that at least 10 per cent of drivers are using illicit substances.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the loophole in the law that allows drivers to work 16.25 hour days in 24 hours.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Inspector Rankin's concern that illicit drug taking is contributing to truck crashes on the road each year.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER misses the use of secretive codes over radio systems.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention Inspector Bernie Rankin's statement about one in 12 heavy vehicle drivers testing positive for drugs.\", \"* The ANSWER omits the use of log books to roll out lines and smoke ice.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the video exposing a truck driver snorting drugs.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention Simon Green's statement about 10 per cent of drivers using illicit substances.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the loophole in the law allowing drivers to work 16.25 hour days.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention Inspector Rankin's concern about truck crashes.\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER partially summarizes the DOCUMENT, but it misses some crucial information and context.\", \"The ANSWER does not fully capture the extent of the problem, as stated in the DOCUMENT (\\\"one in every 12 truckies tested positive for drugs while out on the road\\\").\", \"The ANSWER also does not mention the use of secretive codes over radio systems, which is a significant aspect of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER fails to mention Inspector Bernie Rankin's statement that one in 12 heavy vehicle drivers test positive for drugs when pulled over.\", \"The ANSWER also omits the fact that drivers are using their log books to roll out lines and smoke ice.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Simon Green's statement that at least 10 per cent of drivers are using illicit substances.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the loophole in the law that allows drivers to work 16.25 hour days in 24 hours.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Inspector Rankin's concern that illicit drug taking is contributing to truck crashes on the road each year.\""
] |
204
|
{
"_id": 204,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT because it summarizes the main points of the article without introducing new information. \nHowever, the ANSWER does not capture the full context of the article, such as Ashley Young's feelings about being a senior member of the squad and the team spirit at Manchester United.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER does not mention the team's response to the departures of Nemanja Vidic, Rio Ferdinand, and Patrice Evra, which is an important aspect of the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER also does not mention Ashley Young's thoughts on Wayne Rooney and the team's captaincy, which are discussed in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of the facts it presents, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER is a good summary of the article, but it could be improved by including more context and details.\nThe ANSWER is missing key information, such as Ashley Young's feelings about being a senior member of the squad and the team's response to the departures of Nemanja Vidic, Rio Ferdinand, and Patrice Evra.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the full tone and context of the DOCUMENT, which is a mix of Ashley Young's personal thoughts and the team's dynamics.\nThe ANSWER is missing key quotes from the DOCUMENT, such as 'I was looking around and thinking I was in the top six or seven who have been here the longest now' and 'You have got to have good team spirit and we have got that here.'\nThe ANSWER is missing key information about Ashley Young's role in the team and his thoughts on Wayne Rooney and the team's captaincy.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the full context of Ashley Young's experience at Manchester United, including his time to come into his own and his thoughts on the team's dynamics.\nThe ANSWER is a good start, but it needs more details and context to be a comprehensive summary of the article.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the full tone and context of the DOCUMENT, which is a mix of Ashley Young's personal thoughts and the team's dynamics.\nThe ANSWER is missing key information, such as Ashley Young's feelings about being a senior member of the squad and the team's response to the departures of Nemanja Vidic, Rio Ferdinand, and Patrice Evra.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the full context of Ashley Young's experience at Manchester United, including his time to come into his own and his thoughts on the team's dynamics.\nThe ANSWER is missing key quotes from the DOCUMENT, such as 'I was looking around and thinking I was in the top six or seven who have been here the longest now' and 'You have got to have good team spirit and we have got that here.'\nThe ANSWER is missing key information about Ashley Young's role in the team and his"
}
| null | null |
781
|
{
"_id": 781,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, it appears that the ANSWER is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER mentions Diego Maradona's boxing training and the different parts of the body he targets, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT's description of Maradona punching the ball past Peter Shilton and hitting the dummy's head and body.\nHowever, the ANSWER does not explicitly mention Maradona's past controversies or his current weight management, which are also mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, and it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER's brevity may be seen as a minor deviation from the DOCUMENT's more detailed description, but overall, it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION, but this may be due to the DOCUMENT's focus on Maradona's boxing training rather than providing an overall summary of the article.\", \n\"Diego Maradona was filmed hitting a dummy during boxing try outs.\"\n\"- The ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"- 'Diego Maradona was filmed hitting a dummy during boxing try outs.' - This span is consistent with the DOCUMENT's description of Maradona punching the ball past Peter Shilton and hitting the dummy's head and body.\", \n\"- 'Former Argentina star hit dummy in head and on the body.' - This span is consistent with the DOCUMENT's description of Maradona punching the ball past Peter Shilton and hitting the dummy's head and body.\", \n\"- 'Diego Maradona was filmed hitting a dummy during boxing try outs.' - This span is a minor deviation from the DOCUMENT's more detailed description, but it is still faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, it appears that the ANSWER is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER mentions Diego Maradona's boxing training and the different parts of the body he targets, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT's description of Maradona punching the ball past Peter Shilton and hitting the dummy's head and body.\nHowever, the ANSWER does not explicitly mention Maradona's past controversies or his current weight management, which are also mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, and it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER's brevity may be seen as a minor deviation from the DOCUMENT's more detailed description, but overall, it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION, but this may be due to the DOCUMENT's focus on Maradona's boxing training rather than providing an overall summary of the article.\", \n\"Diego Maradona was filmed hitting a dummy during boxing try outs.\"\n\"- The ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\""
] |
275
|
{
"_id": 275,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides incorrect information about the player who missed the edge and was dismissed caught behind. The DOCUMENT states that it was Devon Smith, not Kraigg Brathwaite, who missed the edge and was dismissed caught behind. The ANSWER also incorrectly states that the ball hit Brathwaite's outside edge, whereas the DOCUMENT states that the ball hit his leg stump.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Brathwaite reviewed the decision, whereas the DOCUMENT states that he declined to review the decision without HotSpot technology.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the ball went to Jos Buttler, whereas the DOCUMENT states that the ball went to Chris Jordan.\", \"The ANSWER provides a summary of the day's events but does not accurately represent the specific details mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT but fails to provide accurate information.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER incorrectly states that Kraigg Brathwaite missed the ball and reviewed the decision.\", \"* The ANSWER incorrectly states that the ball hit Brathwaite's outside edge.\", \"* The ANSWER incorrectly states that the ball went to Jos Buttler.\", \"* The ANSWER incorrectly states that the ball went to Chris Jordan without HotSpot technology.\", \"* The ANSWER provides a summary of the day's events but does not accurately represent the specific details mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides incorrect information about the player who missed the edge and was dismissed caught behind. The DOCUMENT states that it was Devon Smith, not Kraigg Brathwaite, who missed the edge and was dismissed caught behind. The ANSWER also incorrectly states that the ball hit Brathwaite's outside edge, whereas the DOCUMENT states that the ball hit his leg stump.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Brathwaite reviewed the decision, whereas the DOCUMENT states that he declined to review the decision without HotSpot technology.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the ball went to Jos Buttler, whereas the DOCUMENT states that the ball went to Chris Jordan.\", \"The ANSWER provides a summary of the day's events but does not accurately represent the specific details mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT but fails to provide accurate information.\""
] |
840
|
{
"_id": 840,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully summarize the article, as it omits key details such as the acquittal of Morsi on incitement to murder charges and the reaction of lawyers and the United Nations.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the death penalty, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT as a potential charge against Morsi.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the government crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood, the number of people killed and thousands thrown in jail, or the reactions of Brotherhood leaders.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the verdicts in the two other trials against Morsi, including the one for spying for foreign powers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Sisi's regime, the popularity of Sisi among Egyptians, or the accusations of repression.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the court dropping murder charges against Mubarak in his own trial.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in the sense that it mentions the convictions of 14 others and the sentences of 20 years.\", \"However, the ANSWER is not fully faithful to the DOCUMENT as it omits many key details and does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"A court in Cairo has sentenced the former leader over abuses of protesters.\", \"But he was cleared of charges that would have seen him face additional charges.\", \"14 others convicted on same charges with most also sentenced to 20 years.\", \"Defence lawyers said they would launch an appeal against the convictions.\", \"These spans are faithful to the DOCUMENT as they mention the convictions and sentences, but they are not comprehensive and omit many key details.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not fully summarize the article, as it omits key details such as the acquittal of Morsi on incitement to murder charges and the reaction of lawyers and the United Nations.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the death penalty, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT as a potential charge against Morsi.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the government crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood, the number of people killed and thousands thrown in jail, or the reactions of Brotherhood leaders.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the verdicts in the two other trials against Morsi, including the one for spying for foreign powers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Sisi's regime, the popularity of Sisi among Egyptians, or the accusations of repression.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the court dropping murder charges against Mubarak in his own trial.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in the sense that it mentions the convictions of 14 others and the sentences of 20 years.\", \"However, the ANSWER is not fully faithful to the DOCUMENT as it omits many key details and does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article.\""
] |
416
|
{
"_id": 416,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Ambiguity in the ANSWER's wording might lead to a different interpretation of the DOCUMENT's content. The ANSWER does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article, only mentioning two specific events: flash floods in Spencer and a nearby town experiencing heavy rain. This limited information does not fully capture the scope and severity of the severe weather that affected the mid-United States, as described in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention other significant weather events, such as the hailstones, roads flooded in St Louis, or the severe weather in Indiana and Illinois. These details are crucial in understanding the extent of the severe weather, and their omission might make the ANSWER seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not provide any new information or insights beyond what is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. It only reiterates some of the events described in the DOCUMENT without adding any depth or context.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but its brevity and limited scope make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT's content.\"]\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Spencer was hit Tuesday by flash floods (<-- This spans from the ANSWER that influences the SCORE, as it is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT that Spencer was hit by flash floods.\"),\n\"A nearby town had more than two inches of rain in less than half an hour (<-- This spans from the ANSWER that influences the SCORE, as it is mentioned in the DOCUMENT that roads around St Louis were deluged with rainwater in half an hour.)\"]"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"Ambiguity in the ANSWER's wording might lead to a different interpretation of the DOCUMENT's content. The ANSWER does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article, only mentioning two specific events: flash floods in Spencer and a nearby town experiencing heavy rain. This limited information does not fully capture the scope and severity of the severe weather that affected the mid-United States, as described in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention other significant weather events, such as the hailstones, roads flooded in St Louis, or the severe weather in Indiana and Illinois. These details are crucial in understanding the extent of the severe weather, and their omission might make the ANSWER seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not provide any new information or insights beyond what is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. It only reiterates some of the events described in the DOCUMENT without adding any depth or context.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but its brevity and limited scope make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT's content.\""
] |
572
|
{
"_id": 572,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the four episodes shown in February notching up nine million views alone as stated in the DOCUMENT. This is a significant piece of information that is crucial to the context of the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the viewing figures for the BBC's iPlayer, which is a key point in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does mention the number of times episode two was watched, but this is not the same information as the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the BBC's director-general Tony Hall's announcement that a line has been crossed and there cannot be one rule for one and one rule for another, which is a crucial point in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the BBC's potential loss of £67million a year, which is a significant consequence of Jeremy Clarkson's dismissal, as stated in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the sale of Top Gear Magazine, live shows, and DVDs, which is a crucial point in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the global circulation of Top Gear Magazine, the sale of tickets to live shows, or the potential for rivals to compete for Clarkson's signature, which are all important points in the DOCUMENT.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Figures come a week after Jeremy Clarkson was relaunched from the BBC (ANSWER does not mention Clarkson was relaunched, DOCUMENT states he was sacked)\",\n\"Top Gear took up first, third and fifth spots in iPlayer top five for February (ANSWER does not mention the four episodes notching up nine million views alone, DOCUMENT states this)\",\n\"Episode two of the BB2 show's last series was watched 2,645,000 times (ANSWER does not mention the viewing figures for the BBC's iPlayer, DOCUMENT states this was not the case)\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the four episodes shown in February notching up nine million views alone as stated in the DOCUMENT. This is a significant piece of information that is crucial to the context of the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the viewing figures for the BBC's iPlayer, which is a key point in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does mention the number of times episode two was watched, but this is not the same information as the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the BBC's director-general Tony Hall's announcement that a line has been crossed and there cannot be one rule for one and one rule for another, which is a crucial point in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the BBC's potential loss of £67million a year, which is a significant consequence of Jeremy Clarkson's dismissal, as stated in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the sale of Top Gear Magazine, live shows, and DVDs, which is a crucial point in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the global circulation of Top Gear Magazine, the sale of tickets to live shows, or the potential for rivals to compete for Clarkson's signature, which are all important points in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
404
|
{
"_id": 404,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information about Radamel Falcao, stating he is not expected to stay at Manchester United. This is contrary to the DOCUMENT, which states Falcao is 'unlikely to remain at the club after scoring only four goals and failing to force his way into Louis van Gaal's starting XI.'\n\" \n\"The ANSWER also omits key information about Falcao's wages being 'beyond Juventus' means' as stated in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER instead mentions that Falcao is a Monaco player on loan at Manchester United, which is correct but not relevant to the context of the DOCUMENT.\n\" \n\"The ANSWER correctly states that Juventus have expressed interest in Palermo's Paulo Dybala and Edinson Cavani, as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"Falcao's expected departure from Manchester United\", \"Falcao's wages being 'beyond Juventus' means'] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information about Radamel Falcao, stating he is not expected to stay at Manchester United. This is contrary to the DOCUMENT, which states Falcao is 'unlikely to remain at the club after scoring only four goals and failing to force his way into Louis van Gaal's starting XI.'\n\" \n\"The ANSWER also omits key information about Falcao's wages being 'beyond Juventus' means' as stated in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER instead mentions that Falcao is a Monaco player on loan at Manchester United, which is correct but not relevant to the context of the DOCUMENT.\n\" \n\"The ANSWER correctly states that Juventus have expressed interest in Palermo's Paulo Dybala and Edinson Cavani, as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\n\""
] |
789
|
{
"_id": 789,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not provide the full context of Brynn's medical history, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions Brynn's diagnosis of mast cell disease and her allergies, but it does not mention her IBS, gastroparesis, POTS, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, or the various medical treatments she has undergone.\nThe ANSWER also inaccurately states that Brynn has a feeding tube and is on constant doses of barbituates. In the DOCUMENT, it is mentioned that Brynn has a chest port and is being treated with medications to keep her alive.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the complexity of Brynn's condition or the various specialists she has seen. It also does not convey the emotional toll of living with mast cell disease.\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not provide the full context of Brynn's medical history</span>, <span style='color: red'>it inaccurately states that Brynn has a feeding tube and is on constant doses of barbituates</span>, and <span style='color: red'>it does not capture the complexity of Brynn's condition</span>\".] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not provide the full context of Brynn's medical history, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions Brynn's diagnosis of mast cell disease and her allergies, but it does not mention her IBS, gastroparesis, POTS, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, or the various medical treatments she has undergone.\nThe ANSWER also inaccurately states that Brynn has a feeding tube and is on constant doses of barbituates. In the DOCUMENT, it is mentioned that Brynn has a chest port and is being treated with medications to keep her alive.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the complexity of Brynn's condition or the various specialists she has seen. It also does not convey the emotional toll of living with mast cell disease.\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\""
] |
843
|
{
"_id": 843,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the specific cases of child abandonment in Australia, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Justice Diana Bryant's statement that commercial surrogacy should be legalized in Australia.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Indian case where a couple left a baby boy born to an Indian surrogate with his mother.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Thai government's law criminalizing surrogacy and prohibiting foreigners from seeking surrogacy services.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the idea that many children born to surrogates overseas will never get the chance to meet their biological mothers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the responsibility of a country to make sure the worse aspects of commercial surrogacy are overcome.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the current surrogacy laws in the Northern Territory, NSW, ACT, and Queensland.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the idea that regulating and allowing commercial surrogacy in Australia would ensure it's done on ethical terms.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the recent bout of child abandonment cases where parents have refused to carry through with overseas surrogacy deals.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the specific cases of child abandonment in Australia.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention Justice Diana Bryant's statement that commercial surrogacy should be legalized in Australia.</span>\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Indian case where a couple left a baby boy born to an Indian surrogate with his mother.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the Thai government's law criminalizing surrogacy and prohibiting foreigners from seeking surrogacy services.</span>\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the idea that many children born to surrogates overseas will never get the chance to meet their biological mothers.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the responsibility of a country to make sure the worse aspects of commercial surrogacy are overcome.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the current surrogacy laws in the Northern Territory, NSW, ACT, and Queensland.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the idea that regulating and allowing commercial surrogacy in Australia would ensure it's done on ethical terms.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the recent bout of child abandonment cases where parents have refused to carry through with overseas surrogacy deals.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not mention the specific cases of child abandonment in Australia, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Justice Diana Bryant's statement that commercial surrogacy should be legalized in Australia.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Indian case where a couple left a baby boy born to an Indian surrogate with his mother.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Thai government's law criminalizing surrogacy and prohibiting foreigners from seeking surrogacy services.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the idea that many children born to surrogates overseas will never get the chance to meet their biological mothers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the responsibility of a country to make sure the worse aspects of commercial surrogacy are overcome.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the current surrogacy laws in the Northern Territory, NSW, ACT, and Queensland.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the idea that regulating and allowing commercial surrogacy in Australia would ensure it's done on ethical terms.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the recent bout of child abandonment cases where parents have refused to carry through with overseas surrogacy deals.\""
] |
657
|
{
"_id": 657,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article as it only mentions the age of new UK fathers and some health risks, but it fails to mention other key points such as the decline in sperm quality with age, the risks of miscarriage and premature birth, and the link between advanced paternal age and breast cancer.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the 50% lower chance of conceiving for men over 35 compared to men under 25, or the increased risk of retinoblastoma, Down's syndrome, and childhood leukemia.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study of 23,821 pregnant women, or the fact that pregnancies involving men over 40 were twice as likely to end in the loss of the foetus.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the link between advanced paternal age and genetic disorders such as achondroplasia.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any explanation for why the quality of sperm declines with age.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Dr. Simon Fishel's statement about the decline in sperm DNA with age.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Dr. Dolores Lamb's statement about the medical community needing to educate couples about the risks of conception at advanced paternal age.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study that found that semen quality declined continuously with age, with no point at which risk suddenly increased.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"One-half of new UK fathers are now over 30\", \"The older they are, the greater the risk of health problems\", \"Increases the risk of epilepsy, autism and breast cancer for baby\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article\", \"The ANSWER does not mention key points such as decline in sperm quality, risks of miscarriage and premature birth, and link between advanced paternal age and breast cancer\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article as it only mentions the age of new UK fathers and some health risks, but it fails to mention other key points such as the decline in sperm quality with age, the risks of miscarriage and premature birth, and the link between advanced paternal age and breast cancer.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the 50% lower chance of conceiving for men over 35 compared to men under 25, or the increased risk of retinoblastoma, Down's syndrome, and childhood leukemia.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study of 23,821 pregnant women, or the fact that pregnancies involving men over 40 were twice as likely to end in the loss of the foetus.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the link between advanced paternal age and genetic disorders such as achondroplasia.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any explanation for why the quality of sperm declines with age.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Dr. Simon Fishel's statement about the decline in sperm DNA with age.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Dr. Dolores Lamb's statement about the medical community needing to educate couples about the risks of conception at advanced paternal age.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study that found that semen quality declined continuously with age, with no point at which risk suddenly increased.\""
] |
784
|
{
"_id": 784,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the location of the fight, stating it is in Reno instead of Las Vegas.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the $300 million price tag of the fight.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Mike Tyson's involvement in the top 10 highest grossing pay-per-view fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the top 10 pay-per-view fighters' average payout.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that six of the top 10 pay-per-view events have gone the distance.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that Mayweather tends to give his viewers value for money by going the distance during his fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Oscar De La Hoya's involvement in the top 10 highest grossing pay-per-view fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Lennox Lewis's involvement in the top 10 highest grossing pay-per-view fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Miguel Cotto's involvement in the top 10 highest grossing pay-per-view fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Peter McNeeley's involvement in the top 10 highest grossing pay-per-view fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Shane Moseley's involvement in the top 10 highest grossing pay-per-view fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Felix Trinidad's involvement in the top 10 highest grossing pay-per-view fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention George Foreman's involvement in the top 10 highest grossing pay-per-view fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Pacquiao's involvement in the top 10 highest grossing pay-per-view fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that Tyson is responsible for the first and second most economically inefficient fights inside the top 10.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that Tyson's biggest earner came after his defeat against Lennox Lewis.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that Pacquiao features only once in the current list after earning around $555,555 per minute.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that Mayweather has featured in three of the top 10 highest grossing pay-per-view fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that Pacquiao features only once in the current list after earning around $555,555 per minute.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that Mayweather tends to give his viewers value for money by going the distance during his fights.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that six of the top 10 pay-per-view events have gone the distance.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that the average payout for the top 10 pay-per-view fighters stands at $22.4m.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that Mayweather's lucrative victory against Saul Alvarez in 2013 looks set to be eclipsed by his next bout.\", \"The"
}
| null | null |
76
|
{
"_id": 76,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT, covering the key points about Xu's actions and motivations.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide additional context or details that are present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not omit any crucial information from the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER's tone and language are consistent with the DOCUMENT's tone and language.\", \"The ANSWER's focus is on the core events and facts of the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER provides a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT's key points, including Xu's actions and motivations.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not omit any crucial information from the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER's tone and language are consistent with the DOCUMENT's tone and language.</span>\"]}}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT, covering the key points about Xu's actions and motivations.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide additional context or details that are present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not omit any crucial information from the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER's tone and language are consistent with the DOCUMENT's tone and language.\", \"The ANSWER's focus is on the core events and facts of the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
743
|
{
"_id": 743,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the three surviving species of rhino, the white rhino, the black rhino, and the greater one-horned rhino as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Jurassic era or the Lost World as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide the context of the current century and the modern world as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that rhinos are mammals, just like humans, and are adapted for the current century.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide the details of the poaching figures, the South African and Vietnamese governments' agreement, or the efforts of organizations like Education for Nature in Vietnam (ENV) and Save The Rhino.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the idea that rhino horn is made of keratin, the same stuff as fingernails, or the absurdity of selling rhino horn for its supposed medicinal properties.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that rhinos are being killed because of belief in a discredited form of magic and the love of showing off.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide the suggestion to try biting nails as a cure for a hangover.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT and only provides a limited summary of the main points.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>Lack of specific details about the three surviving species of rhino</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Lack of context about the current century and the modern world</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Limited summary of the main points without providing supporting details</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not mention the three surviving species of rhino, the white rhino, the black rhino, and the greater one-horned rhino as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Jurassic era or the Lost World as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide the context of the current century and the modern world as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that rhinos are mammals, just like humans, and are adapted for the current century.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide the details of the poaching figures, the South African and Vietnamese governments' agreement, or the efforts of organizations like Education for Nature in Vietnam (ENV) and Save The Rhino.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the idea that rhino horn is made of keratin, the same stuff as fingernails, or the absurdity of selling rhino horn for its supposed medicinal properties.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that rhinos are being killed because of belief in a discredited form of magic and the love of showing off.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide the suggestion to try biting nails as a cure for a hangover.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT and only provides a limited summary of the main points.\""
] |
473
|
{
"_id": 473,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of the main events described. However, it contains some inaccuracies and omissions that affect its overall faithfulness to the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER states that the tourist was shot out three tyres to stop the car, whereas the DOCUMENT states that the police shot out three wheels of the car. Additionally, the ANSWER does not mention the woman's injuries or her regret for her actions, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT. Furthermore, the ANSWER omits the context of the woman driving the wrong way down the road and the formation of an angry mob, which is described in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER also contains some grammatical errors and omissions that further affect its faithfulness to the DOCUMENT. For example, the ANSWER states that the tourist was attacked by the mob, but the DOCUMENT states that the mob hurled abuse and tried to attack the American, but the police intervened to protect her.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the context of the woman driving the wrong way down the road and the formation of an angry mob, which is described in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also does not mention the woman's identity, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER contains some inaccuracies in terms of the details of the car damage, with the ANSWER stating that the left side of the car was damaged, whereas the DOCUMENT states that the left side of the white Toyota Innova was damaged.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the woman's regret for her actions, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the woman's injuries, with the ANSWER stating that she was taken to hospital suffering from injuries to her leg, whereas the DOCUMENT states that she was taken to hospital suffering from injuries to her leg and that she was given a 'hefty' traffic fine.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the woman's identity, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the context of the woman driving the wrong way down the road and the formation of an angry mob, which is described in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the details of the car damage, with the ANSWER stating that the car was damaged, whereas the DOCUMENT states that the left side of the white Toyota Innova was damaged.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the woman's regret for her actions, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the woman's injuries, with the ANSWER stating that she was taken to hospital suffering from injuries to her leg, whereas the DOCUMENT states that she was taken to hospital suffering from injuries to her leg and that she was given a 'hefty' traffic fine.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the woman's identity, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the context of the woman driving"
}
| null | null |
211
|
{
"_id": 211,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully summarize the DOCUMENT. It only mentions that 'Hot or Not' videos are being posted by young girls as young as nine and gathering views online, but it does not discuss the impact of these videos on the next generation. The ANSWER also does not address the reasons why this new form of humiliation is starting ever younger, which is an important point discussed in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear answer to the question of what effect this new form of humiliation will have on the next generation, which is a key point of the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully summarize the DOCUMENT.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER only mentions that 'Hot or Not' videos are being posted by young girls as young as nine and gathering views online, but it does not discuss the impact of these videos on the next generation.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not fully summarize the DOCUMENT. It only mentions that 'Hot or Not' videos are being posted by young girls as young as nine and gathering views online, but it does not discuss the impact of these videos on the next generation. The ANSWER also does not address the reasons why this new form of humiliation is starting ever younger, which is an important point discussed in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear answer to the question of what effect this new form of humiliation will have on the next generation, which is a key point of the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
718
|
{
"_id": 718,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the 'luxury of time and hindsight', 'various after-action reports and assessments', or the 'trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev' as mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not discuss the 'dangerous gap' in police training or the 'competency of the response' as mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the 'fog of war' or the 'disorganized and often unnecessarily dangerous response' during the manhunt as mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not discuss the 'blinding clarity of hindsight' or the 'constant willingness to learn' from the tragedy as mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not provide any new information or insights beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of the context and the events discussed, but it does not provide a summary as requested in the QUESTION.\nHowever, the ANSWER does correctly state that the sentencing phase of the trial begins on Tuesday and that the Boston Marathon takes place on Monday, which is a factual statement.\"\n],\"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide a summary as requested in the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention 'luxury of time and hindsight', 'various after-action reports and assessments', or the 'trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev' as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not discuss the 'dangerous gap' in police training or the 'competency of the response' as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the 'fog of war' or the 'disorganized and often unnecessarily dangerous response' during the manhunt as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not discuss the 'blinding clarity of hindsight' or the 'constant willingness to learn' from the tragedy as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any new information or insights beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of the context and the events discussed, but it does not provide a summary as requested in the QUESTION.\"] }"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the 'luxury of time and hindsight",
"various after-action reports and assessments', or the 'trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev' as mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not discuss the 'dangerous gap' in police training or the 'competency of the response' as mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the 'fog of war' or the 'disorganized and often unnecessarily dangerous response' during the manhunt as mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not discuss the 'blinding clarity of hindsight' or the 'constant willingness to learn' from the tragedy as mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not provide any new information or insights beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of the context and the events discussed, but it does not provide a summary as requested in the QUESTION.\nHowever, the ANSWER does correctly state that the sentencing phase of the trial begins on Tuesday and that the Boston Marathon takes place on Monday, which is a factual statement.\"\n"
] |
825
|
{
"_id": 825,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the essence of the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that Borussia Dortmund and Bayern Munich have shared the last five Bundesliga titles, but it does not explicitly state that they have shared the last five titles equally. The ANSWER also states that Bayern currently have a 10-point lead, but the DOCUMENT states that the gap is 31 points, and Dortmund are 10th place, while Bayern are at the summit of the table. The ANSWER also fails to mention the context of the game, which is a crucial aspect of the DOCUMENT.\n \nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n \nThe ANSWER does not mention the coach Jurgen Klopp's statement, which is an important aspect of the DOCUMENT. It also fails to mention the importance of the game for both teams, such as the gap between them and the standings.\n \nThe ANSWER does not capture the essence of the game and its significance, which is a crucial aspect of the DOCUMENT.\n \nThe ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT, which is the primary requirement.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not capture the essence of the game and its significance.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the coach Jurgen Klopp's statement.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the context of the game.\", \"The ANSWER fails to mention the importance of the game for both teams.\", \"The ANSWER states that Bayern currently have a 10-point lead, but the DOCUMENT states that the gap is 31 points.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the essence of the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that Borussia Dortmund and Bayern Munich have shared the last five Bundesliga titles, but it does not explicitly state that they have shared the last five titles equally. The ANSWER also states that Bayern currently have a 10-point lead, but the DOCUMENT states that the gap is 31 points, and Dortmund are 10th place, while Bayern are at the summit of the table. The ANSWER also fails to mention the context of the game, which is a crucial aspect of the DOCUMENT.\n \nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n \nThe ANSWER does not mention the coach Jurgen Klopp's statement, which is an important aspect of the DOCUMENT. It also fails to mention the importance of the game for both teams, such as the gap between them and the standings.\n \nThe ANSWER does not capture the essence of the game and its significance, which is a crucial aspect of the DOCUMENT.\n \nThe ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT, which is the primary requirement.\n\""
] |
110
|
{
"_id": 110,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides the essential information from the DOCUMENT, including the man's name change and his intentions.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not include the full context of the DOCUMENT, such as the reason behind the name change, the man's platform, and the reactions of others.\", \"The ANSWER also does not capture the nuances of the DOCUMENT, like Dea Riley's quote about the new Galbraith having'very big shoes to fill' and her concerns about his name being used for political gain.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides some basic information but lacks the depth and context of the DOCUMENT.\", \"Additionally, the ANSWER does not include the information about the Secretary of State's office and the requirements for independent candidates to get on the ballot.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not fully convey it.\", \"The ANSWER's lack of context and depth makes it less faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the full context of the DOCUMENT and lacks depth.\", \"The ANSWER does not capture Dea Riley's quote and concerns about the new Galbraith's name being used for political gain.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER does not include the full context of the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER lacks depth and does not capture the nuances of the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER does not include Dea Riley's quote and concerns about the new Galbraith's name being used for political gain.\", \"* The ANSWER does not include information about the Secretary of State's office and the requirements for independent candidates to get on the ballot.\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides the essential information from the DOCUMENT, including the man's name change and his intentions.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not include the full context of the DOCUMENT, such as the reason behind the name change, the man's platform, and the reactions of others.\", \"The ANSWER also does not capture the nuances of the DOCUMENT, like Dea Riley's quote about the new Galbraith having'very big shoes to fill' and her concerns about his name being used for political gain.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides some basic information but lacks the depth and context of the DOCUMENT.\", \"Additionally, the ANSWER does not include the information about the Secretary of State's office and the requirements for independent candidates to get on the ballot.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not fully convey it.\", \"The ANSWER's lack of context and depth makes it less faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict the information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the full context of the DOCUMENT and lacks depth.\", \"The ANSWER does not capture Dea Riley's quote and concerns about the new Galbraith's name being used for political gain.\""
] |
334
|
{
"_id": 334,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Answer does not mention the match being a 0-0 draw as stated in the DOCUMENT, which is a crucial piece of information.\",\n\"The answer does mention that Wenger and John Terry faced off, but it does not mention the match being a 0-0 draw as stated in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The answer mentions that neither boss was in a combative mood before the game, but it does not mention the past match-ups between the pair as stated in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The answer mentions that Arsenal manager has a poor record against Mourinho, but it does not mention the specific 13 meetings as stated in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The answer mentions that the point is significant for Chelsea in their march toward the title, but it does not mention the title wait for Arsenal as stated in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The answer mentions that Mourinho hits out at 'boring' criticism, but it does not mention the criticism as stated in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The answer mentions that Mourinho claims an 11-year title wait for Arsenal is the real tragedy, but it does not mention the title wait as stated in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the 'joss sticks' or the 'purple prose' as stated in the DOCUMENT, which were key to the tone of the match.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the 'benign countenance' of Wenger as stated in the DOCUMENT, which was a notable detail.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the'slo-mo' shot of Wenger as stated in the DOCUMENT, which was a key visual moment.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the'maths lecture' on the points position at the top of the table as stated in the DOCUMENT, which was a notable detail.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the description of John Terry's performance as 'from the moon' as stated in the DOCUMENT, which was a notable detail.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the 'enjoyable chill out zone' that the managers created before kick off as stated in the DOCUMENT, which was a notable detail.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the 'Reporter Patrick Davidson's attempt to get the Chelsea manager to bite' as stated in the DOCUMENT, which was a notable detail.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the 'Sky Sports team acting as pacemaker for the afternoon' as stated in the DOCUMENT, which was a notable detail.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the 'Cesc Fabregas happening to be the man in the middle' as stated in the DOCUMENT, which was a notable detail.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the 'Arsene vs Jose show' as stated in the DOCUMENT, which was a notable detail.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the 'pre-game interviews' as stated in the DOCUMENT, which were a notable detail.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the 'pre-game purple prose' as stated in the DOCUMENT, which was a notable detail.\",\n\"The answer does not mention the 'Gaffercam' as stated in the DOCUMENT, which was a notable detail.\",\n\"The answer does not"
}
| null | null |
811
|
{
"_id": 811,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides some incorrect information, which can be seen by comparing it to the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER states that Valbona Yzeiraj pleaded guilty to charges of assault, whereas the DOCUMENT states that she pleaded not guilty. Additionally, the ANSWER does not mention that she pulled patients' teeth, which is a crucial piece of information in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Valbona Yzeiraj called herself 'Dr Val' when wearing a white coat, whereas the DOCUMENT states that she called herself 'Dr Val' when her boss, Dr Jeffrey Schoengold, wasn't present.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the charges of unauthorized practice of a profession and reckless endangerment, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Valbona Yzeiraj was fired from Ultimate Dental Care of Riverdale after the company found out she was performing as a dentist, whereas the DOCUMENT states that she was fired after trying to steal from the practice.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* Valbona Yzeiraj pleaded guilty (incorrectly stated in the ANSWER)\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides some incorrect information, which can be seen by comparing it to the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER states that Valbona Yzeiraj pleaded guilty to charges of assault, whereas the DOCUMENT states that she pleaded not guilty. Additionally, the ANSWER does not mention that she pulled patients' teeth, which is a crucial piece of information in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Valbona Yzeiraj called herself 'Dr Val' when wearing a white coat, whereas the DOCUMENT states that she called herself 'Dr Val' when her boss, Dr Jeffrey Schoengold, wasn't present.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the charges of unauthorized practice of a profession and reckless endangerment, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Valbona Yzeiraj was fired from Ultimate Dental Care of Riverdale after the company found out she was performing as a dentist, whereas the DOCUMENT states that she was fired after trying to steal from the practice.\""
] |
867
|
{
"_id": 867,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER seems to be faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not introduce any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. However, some minor discrepancies were noticed.\",\n\"The ANSWER mentions that the driver played 'chicken' through the streets, but the DOCUMENT describes the incident as a 'demolition derby'. This might be a slight difference in wording, but it does not change the overall meaning.\",\n\"The ANSWER mentions that the police shot out three tyres, but the DOCUMENT states that they shot out three wheels. This is a minor discrepancy, but it does not affect the overall accuracy of the ANSWER.\",\n\"The ANSWER mentions that the angry mob surrounded the vehicle to attack the blond driver, but the DOCUMENT states that the mob hurled abuse and tried to attack the American. This is a slight difference in wording, but it does not change the overall meaning.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the woman's regret for her actions or the traffic fine and damages she was ordered to pay. These details are present in the DOCUMENT, but they are not mentioned in the ANSWER.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"- The ANSWER mentions that the driver played 'chicken' through the streets (highlighted as a discrepancy with the DOCUMENT's 'demolition derby' description),\n- The ANSWER mentions that the police shot out three tyres (highlighted as a discrepancy with the DOCUMENT's 'three wheels' description),\n- The ANSWER mentions that the angry mob surrounded the vehicle to attack the blond driver (highlighted as a discrepancy with the DOCUMENT's 'hurling abuse and tried to attack the American' description)\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER seems to be faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not introduce any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. However, some minor discrepancies were noticed.\",\n\"The ANSWER mentions that the driver played 'chicken' through the streets, but the DOCUMENT describes the incident as a 'demolition derby'. This might be a slight difference in wording, but it does not change the overall meaning.\",\n\"The ANSWER mentions that the police shot out three tyres, but the DOCUMENT states that they shot out three wheels. This is a minor discrepancy, but it does not affect the overall accuracy of the ANSWER.\",\n\"The ANSWER mentions that the angry mob surrounded the vehicle to attack the blond driver, but the DOCUMENT states that the mob hurled abuse and tried to attack the American. This is a slight difference in wording, but it does not change the overall meaning.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the woman's regret for her actions or the traffic fine and damages she was ordered to pay. These details are present in the DOCUMENT, but they are not mentioned in the ANSWER.\""
] |
559
|
{
"_id": 559,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the team's scoring surge or Cambiasso's class as key factors in Leicester's revival.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's improvement in adapting to different situations or Pearson's strength as key factors.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's psychological tools or the impact of their sustained spell in the relegation zone.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent wins over West Ham and Swansea.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Leicester lost to Swansea.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Ulloa's first Premier League goal or his comments on the team's mentality.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the atmosphere at the King Power Stadium or the team's belief building.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Leicester have recorded three consecutive Premier League wins as a defeat.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's position in the table.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's goal difference or other relevant statistics.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's tactics.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's strength.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's adaptability.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's ability to motivate the team.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's personality.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's experience.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's ability to manage the team.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's recent survivals.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's past teams.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's past successes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's past failures.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's past sacking.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's ability to keep the respect of the squad.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's ability to motivate the team.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's ability to manage the team.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's recent survivals.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's past teams.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's past successes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's past failures.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's past sacking.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's recent performances or Pearson's ability"
}
| null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.