File size: 8,828 Bytes
5a64de4 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 |
---
pretty_name: OrgStrategy Reasoning 1k (v2)
license: cc-by-4.0
language:
- en
task_categories:
- text-generation
tags:
- business
- strategy
- consulting
- operations
- chain-of-thought
- reasoning
- frameworks
- management
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
---
# OrgStrategy Reasoning 1k (v2)
## What This Dataset Is About
This dataset contains **1,000 real-world business strategy scenarios** with structured reasoning chains that teach AI models to apply proven strategic frameworks to complex organizational problems.
### Core Purpose
- **Train models to think strategically** using established business frameworks
- **Provide structured reasoning patterns** for complex problem-solving
- **Bridge the gap** between generic AI responses and domain-specific strategic analysis
- **Enable AI assistants** to provide consultant-quality strategic advice
### Why This Dataset Matters
**The Problem:** Most AI models give generic business advice without applying proven strategic frameworks. They lack the structured thinking that consultants use to solve complex organizational challenges.
**The Solution:** This dataset teaches models to:
1. **Identify the right framework** for each problem type
2. **Apply structured analysis** (problem decomposition, root cause analysis, strategic options)
3. **Generate actionable plans** with owners, timelines, and budgets
4. **Think like a consultant** using proven methodologies
## Dataset Structure
### Columns
- **`prompt`**: Business problem with context (sector, metrics, budget, timeline)
- **`reasoning`**: Structured analysis using the specified framework
- **`solution`**: Actionable implementation plan
- **`framework`**: Strategic framework applied (e.g., "Disruptive Innovation", "Blue Ocean")
- **`scenario_type`**: Problem category (finance, people, process, etc.)
### Framework Distribution
The dataset covers 9 major strategic frameworks:
1. **Competitive Advantage** (124 cases) - Cost leadership vs differentiation strategies
2. **7 Powers** (121 cases) - Scale economies, network effects, switching costs
3. **Lean** (116 cases) - Waste elimination, value stream optimization
4. **Blue Ocean** (115 cases) - Creating uncontested market space
5. **Playing To Win** (110 cases) - 5 strategic choices framework
6. **Five Forces** (108 cases) - Porter's industry structure analysis
7. **Good Strategy** (108 cases) - Diagnosis, guiding policy, coherent actions
8. **Disruptive Innovation** (106 cases) - Christensen's disruption theory
9. **Systems Thinking** (92 cases) - Holistic problem-solving approach
### Scenario Types
- **Finance** (181) - Revenue, costs, profitability challenges
- **People** (176) - HR, talent, organizational development
- **Supply** (175) - Supply chain, procurement, logistics
- **Process** (174) - Operations, workflows, efficiency
- **Customer** (151) - Customer experience, satisfaction
- **Technology** (143) - Digital transformation, IT challenges
## Example Entry
### Prompt
```
Healthcare sector: orders processed worsened from 120units/day to 80units/day because of Cycle time increased due to long queues and poor coordination across departments. Budget: $0.41M. Timeline: 5 months. Apply Disruptive Innovation.
```
### Framework Applied
**Disruptive Innovation** - Focuses on simpler, cheaper solutions that start in overlooked segments and move upmarket
### Reasoning Structure
```xml
<strategic_analysis>
**Framework:** Disruptive Innovation
Disruptive innovation describes how simpler, more affordable solutions initially target overlooked segments and then move upmarket, eventually displacing established products.
**Problem Decomposition:** Cycle time increased due to long queues and poor coordination across departments.
**Organizational Impact:**
- Marketing team: 7 FTEs
- Operations team: 12 FTEs
- IT team: 5 FTEs
**Root Cause Analysis:**
1. Manual approval processes creating bottlenecks
2. Lack of cross-department coordination
3. Outdated workflow systems
**Strategic Options:**
1. Implement automated workflow system (Disruptive approach)
2. Redesign approval processes (Sustaining approach)
3. Cross-train staff for flexibility (Hybrid approach)
</strategic_analysis>
<action_plan>
1. Deploy automated workflow platform (Owner: IT Director; Timeline: 8 weeks; Budget: $0.15M)
2. Implement cross-department coordination protocols (Owner: Operations Manager; Timeline: 4 weeks; Budget: $0.05M)
3. Train staff on new systems (Owner: HR Director; Timeline: 6 weeks; Budget: $0.08M)
</action_plan>
```
## How Strategic Frameworks Are Applied
Each framework provides a **structured lens** for analysis:
- **Disruptive Innovation**: Simpler, cheaper solutions starting in overlooked segments
- **Blue Ocean**: Eliminate competition by creating new market space
- **Five Forces**: Analyze industry structure (suppliers, buyers, substitutes, new entrants, rivalry)
- **7 Powers**: Identify structural advantages (scale, network effects, switching costs)
- **Lean**: Eliminate waste and optimize value streams
- **Systems Thinking**: View problems holistically across interconnected parts
- **Competitive Advantage**: Choose between cost leadership and differentiation
- **Playing To Win**: Make 5 strategic choices (aspiration, where to play, how to win, capabilities, systems)
- **Good Strategy**: Diagnose, create guiding policy, design coherent actions
## Intended Uses
### Primary Applications
- **Train strategic reasoning models** for business consulting
- **Fine-tune LLMs** for structured problem-solving
- **Develop AI consultants** that apply proven frameworks
- **Create strategic planning assistants** for organizations
### Research Applications
- **Study framework application patterns** across different problem types
- **Analyze reasoning chain effectiveness** in strategic decision-making
- **Develop evaluation metrics** for strategic reasoning quality
- **Compare framework performance** across scenarios
## Usage Examples
### Basic Loading
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load the dataset
ds = load_dataset("Wildstash/OrgStrategy-Reasoning-1k-v2", split="train")
print(f"Dataset size: {len(ds)}")
print(f"Columns: {ds.column_names}")
```
### Filter by Framework
```python
# Get all Disruptive Innovation cases
disruptive_cases = ds.filter(lambda x: x['framework'] == 'Disruptive Innovation')
print(f"Disruptive Innovation cases: {len(disruptive_cases)}")
# Get all Blue Ocean Strategy cases
blue_ocean_cases = ds.filter(lambda x: x['framework'] == 'Blue Ocean')
print(f"Blue Ocean cases: {len(blue_ocean_cases)}")
```
### Filter by Scenario Type
```python
# Get finance-related scenarios
finance_cases = ds.filter(lambda x: x['scenario_type'] == 'finance')
print(f"Finance scenarios: {len(finance_cases)}")
# Get process optimization cases
process_cases = ds.filter(lambda x: x['scenario_type'] == 'process')
print(f"Process scenarios: {len(process_cases)}")
```
### Training Example
```python
# Example training loop for strategic reasoning
for example in ds:
prompt = example['prompt']
reasoning = example['reasoning']
solution = example['solution']
framework = example['framework']
# Use this for fine-tuning your model
training_example = {
"instruction": f"Apply {framework} framework to solve this business problem: {prompt}",
"response": f"{reasoning}\n\n{solution}"
}
```
### Evaluation Example
```python
# Evaluate model's framework application
def evaluate_framework_usage(model_output, expected_framework):
return expected_framework.lower() in model_output.lower()
# Test on a sample
sample = ds[0]
model_response = your_model.generate(sample['prompt'])
framework_correct = evaluate_framework_usage(model_response, sample['framework'])
```
## Dataset Quality
### Validation
- **Framework consistency**: Each entry applies the specified framework correctly
- **Reasoning structure**: Structured analysis follows consistent patterns
- **Actionability**: Solutions include owners, timelines, and budgets
- **Diversity**: Covers multiple sectors, problem types, and frameworks
### Limitations
- **English only**: All content is in English
- **Business focus**: Primarily corporate/organizational scenarios
- **Framework scope**: Limited to 9 major strategic frameworks
- **Synthetic elements**: Some scenarios may be constructed for training purposes
## Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite:
```bibtex
@dataset{wildstash_orgstrategy_2025,
title={OrgStrategy Reasoning 1k (v2): Business Strategy Scenarios with Structured Reasoning},
author={Wildstash},
year={2025},
url={https://huggingface.co/datasets/Wildstash/OrgStrategy-Reasoning-1k-v2},
license={CC-BY-4.0}
}
```
## License
CC-BY-4.0 - You are free to use, modify, and distribute this dataset for any purpose.
|