From Passive Metric to Active Signal: The Evolving Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models
Abstract
Large language models face reliability challenges that are being addressed through uncertainty as an active control signal across advanced reasoning, autonomous agents, and reinforcement learning, supported by theoretical frameworks like Bayesian methods and conformal prediction.
While Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable capabilities, their unreliability remains a critical barrier to deployment in high-stakes domains. This survey charts a functional evolution in addressing this challenge: the evolution of uncertainty from a passive diagnostic metric to an active control signal guiding real-time model behavior. We demonstrate how uncertainty is leveraged as an active control signal across three frontiers: in advanced reasoning to optimize computation and trigger self-correction; in autonomous agents to govern metacognitive decisions about tool use and information seeking; and in reinforcement learning to mitigate reward hacking and enable self-improvement via intrinsic rewards. By grounding these advancements in emerging theoretical frameworks like Bayesian methods and Conformal Prediction, we provide a unified perspective on this transformative trend. This survey provides a comprehensive overview, critical analysis, and practical design patterns, arguing that mastering the new trend of uncertainty is essential for building the next generation of scalable, reliable, and trustworthy AI.
Community
🗺️ The 2026 Roadmap for Reliable AI: Making Uncertainty Actionable
We are witnessing a paradigm shift in LLMs: Uncertainty is no longer just a passive score for diagnosis—it is evolving into an Active Control Signal for real-time decision-making.
Our comprehensive survey covers this transformation across three frontiers:
- 🧠 Reasoning: Triggering self-correction & optimizing "thinking budget" (System 2).
- 🤖 Agents: Determining when to use tools, ask for help, or stop generation.
- 🎯 Alignment: Using uncertainty as an intrinsic reward to mitigate reward hacking in RLHF.
If you are building Agents or Reasoning Models, this is the functional evolution you need to know. 🚀
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- EpiCaR: Knowing What You Don't Know Matters for Better Reasoning in LLMs (2026)
- Efficient Paths and Dense Rewards: Probabilistic Flow Reasoning for Large Language Models (2026)
- Thinking with Deltas: Incentivizing Reinforcement Learning via Differential Visual Reasoning Policy (2026)
- Silence the Judge: Reinforcement Learning with Self-Verifier via Latent Geometric Clustering (2026)
- AWPO: Enhancing Tool-Use of Large Language Models through Adaptive Integration of Reasoning Rewards (2025)
- Beyond Majority Voting: Towards Fine-grained and More Reliable Reward Signal for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning (2025)
- Evidence-Augmented Policy Optimization with Reward Co-Evolution for Long-Context Reasoning (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper