MuseBench: Benchmarking Intent-Level Audiovisual Arts Understanding in MLLMs
Abstract
A comprehensive benchmark called Musebench is introduced to evaluate multimodal large language models on nuanced artistic understanding, revealing a significant gap between current models and human expert performance in creative domain expertise.
Audiovisual arts encompass diverse creative disciplines, including cinema, visual arts, stage performance, and game design, where artistic meaning arises from deliberate combinations of visual, auditory, and narrative elements (e.g., fear amplified through claustrophobic framing, or grief conveyed through silence and lingering close-ups). True artistic understanding extends beyond recognizing what is depicted to reasoning about why it is expressed through particular creative choices. Despite the strong progress of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), this critical aspect of artistic understanding remains underexplored, as existing benchmarks largely measure perceptual recognition while overlooking reasoning about creative intent. To address this gap, we introduce Musebench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs on nuanced artistic understanding. It comprises 4,016 questions spanning cinematic arts, static visual arts, stage performing arts, and game arts, distilled from over 10K candidate video essays that pair professional commentary with visual demonstration. To capture the open-ended nature of artistic analysis at scale, the benchmark combines single-select and variable-option multi-select questions. All questions are generated and refined through a four-phase iterative pipeline combining shortcut filtering, adversarial distractors, and expert validation. Comprehensive zero-shot evaluation of 28 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals that even the best-performing model achieves only 48.29% accuracy, substantially below human expert performance of 87.18%, exposing a significant gap in current models' creative domain expertise.
Community
.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- MTAVG-Bench 2.0: Diagnosing Failure Modes of Cinematic Expressiveness in Multi-Talker Audio-Video Generation (2026)
- HarmVideoBench: Benchmarking Harmful Video Understanding in Large Multimodal Models (2026)
- NextMotionQA: Benchmarking and Judging Human Motion Understanding with Vision-Language Models (2026)
- VoiceGiraffe: A Benchmark for Extreme Long-Context Audio-Language Understanding (2026)
- MSAVBench: Towards Comprehensive and Reliable Evaluation of Multi-Shot Audio-Video Generation (2026)
- CineCap: Structured Reasoning with Spatio-Temporal Anchors for Cinematographic Video Captioning (2026)
- Artifact-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Detecting and Assessing the Artifacts of AI-Generated Videos (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606.30026 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper