Structured Confidence Perturbation via Fisher Geometry for Adversarial Training
Abstract
A hybrid adversarial training approach combining cross-entropy and KL divergence with geometry-aware perturbations on the confidence manifold improves robustness and transferability by targeting confidence structure deformation.
Adversarial training is often plagued by "pseudo-attacks", perturbations that significantly increase the loss value but fail to truly alter the model's confidence structure. To address this, we propose two complementary approaches to directly attack and defend against confidence structure deformation. First, building upon the traditional loss maximization perspective, we introduce a hybrid objective that integrates cross-entropy and KL divergence, encouraging adversarial examples to simultaneously disrupt prediction accuracy and distribution consistency. Second, we geometrically reconstruct adversarial training by generating perturbations that maximize the distribution distance on the confidence manifold. Theoretical analysis shows that the optimal perturbation direction aligns with the principal eigenvectors of the Fisher information matrix. We also propose an efficient algorithm to avoid high-dimensional matrix computations. Experiments on multiple datasets and model architectures demonstrate that our method outperforms existing methods in adversarial robustness and robust transferability, particularly excelling in structural perturbations within high-confidence regions.
Community
Adversarial training is often plagued by "pseudo-attacks"—perturbations that significantly increase the loss value but fail to truly alter the model's confidence structure. To address this, we propose two complementary approaches to directly attack and defend against confidence structure deformation. First, building upon the traditional loss maximization perspective, we introduce a hybrid objective that integrates cross-entropy and KL divergence, encouraging adversarial examples to simultaneously disrupt prediction accuracy and distribution consistency. Second, we geometrically reconstruct adversarial training by generating perturbations that maximize the distribution distance on the confidence manifold. Theoretical analysis shows that the optimal perturbation direction aligns with the principal eigenvectors of the Fisher information matrix. We also propose an efficient algorithm to avoid high-dimensional matrix computations. Experiments on multiple datasets and model architectures demonstrate that our method outperforms existing methods in adversarial robustness and robust transferability, particularly excelling in structural perturbations within high-confidence regions.
The pseudo-attack idea clicks for me: a perturbation that raises the loss without changing how confident the model is does not teach it much. Aligning the perturbation with the top Fisher eigenvectors is a neat way to aim at the confidence structure. How much extra compute does the efficient approximation add over standard PGD adversarial training?
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Collaboratively Guided Adversarial Robust Distillation with Teacher-Favorable Examples (2026)
- Augmentation-Guided Adversarial Training via Local Stability-Based Sample Selection (2026)
- Anchoring Adversarial Trajectories to Data Manifolds: A Bilevel Transfer Optimization Framework (2026)
- TransferBreaker: Breaking Adversarial Transferability in Fine-Tuned Speech Recognition (2026)
- Sparse Fine-Tuning for Parameter-Efficient Adversarial Training (2026)
- Mind Your Boundaries: Boundary-Aware Model Obfuscation against Cross-node Attack (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper