text stringlengths 46 1.4k | labels listlengths 0 6 | comments listlengths 0 6 | sentences_with_labels stringlengths 75 1.75k |
|---|---|---|---|
TITLE: Old quote, but a good one POST: What are the reasons for viewing regulated hunting in the same light as factory farming? I went veg because factory farming is horribly unnatural, but I can't really come up with an argument against hunting based on what made me go veg... POST: I'm vegan, I'll never part take in this activity, but I don't feel like hunting for fun should be considered a mental illness. Our ancestors used to depend on it to survive, so I can see how it might be in someone's genome to want to hunt. Hunting is almost entirely aligned with the natural cycle of life, factory farming in horrible conditions isn't. Downvotes incoming
| [
{
"start": 128,
"end": 277,
"label": "appeal to nature"
},
{
"start": 284,
"end": 523,
"label": "appeal to tradition"
},
{
"start": 411,
"end": 636,
"label": "appeal to nature"
}
] | [
"Appeal to nature (1): X=Hunting, Y=Factory Farming",
"Appeal to tradition: X: Our ancestors have been hunting to survive, so it is in our genome to hunt. Y: Hunting for fun should not be considered a mental illness.",
"Second appeal to nature: X = Hunting is almost entirely aligned with the natural cycle of li... | {"TITLE: Old quote, but a good one POST: What are the reasons for viewing regulated hunting in the same light as factory farming?": [["nothing"]], "I went veg because factory farming is horribly unnatural, but I can't really come up with an argument against hunting based on what made me go veg...": [["appeal to nature"]], "I'm vegan, I'll never part take in this activity, but I don't feel like hunting for fun should be considered a mental illness.": [["appeal to tradition"]], "Our ancestors used to depend on it to survive, so I can see how it might be in someone's genome to want to hunt.": [["appeal to tradition"], ["appeal to nature"]], "Hunting is almost entirely aligned with the natural cycle of life, factory farming in horrible conditions isn't.": [["appeal to nature"]], "Downvotes incoming\n": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: CMV: You can't justify eating meat POST: Cooking and eating meat is an artistic practice with thousands of years of history. My choice to cook and eat meat is a choice to participate in the continuation of this art form. I support eating meat for the same reason I would support classical music, theater, or sculpture: because I support art. And I am generally skeptical of attempts at soft censorship of this art by shaming meat eaters.
| [
{
"start": 48,
"end": 227,
"label": "appeal to tradition"
},
{
"start": 228,
"end": 348,
"label": "false analogy"
}
] | [
"False analogy: X: Eating meat is an art, Y: Music, theater, and sculpture are arts",
"appeal to tradition: X = coocking and eating meat is a tradition"
] | {"TITLE: CMV: You can't justify eating meat POST:": [["nothing"]], "Cooking and eating meat is an artistic practice with thousands of years of history.": [["appeal to tradition"]], "My choice to cook and eat meat is a choice to participate in the continuation of this art form.": [["appeal to tradition"]], "I support eating meat for the same reason I would support classical music, theater, or sculpture: because I support art.": [["false analogy"]], "And I am generally skeptical of attempts at soft censorship of this art by shaming meat eaters.": [["nothing"]]} |
President Bush didn't. President Obama was right, he said that that was outrageous to have deficits as high as half a trillion dollars under the Bush years. He was right, but then he put in place deficits twice that size for every one of his four years.
| [
{
"start": 157,
"end": 253,
"label": "tu quoque"
}
] | [
"tu quoque: P1 = Obama, X = P1 against deficits, Y = P1 put in place deficits"
] | {"President Bush didn't.": [["nothing"]], "President Obama was right, he said that that was outrageous to have deficits as high as half a trillion dollars under the Bush years.": [["nothing"]], "He was right, but then he put in place deficits twice that size for every one of his four years.": [["tu quoque"]]} |
TITLE: So I have more guns than I'd like to admit, but I feel like a lot of people shouldn't own guns. POST: The drunk guy I agree with, however the other two are perfectly fine. Most states have laws against carry while drinking. Someone choosing to open carry an AR isnt subject to your approval. They dont need you to think their are cool to exercise a right. 14 year olds are plenty old enough to be around loaded guns. They arent 4. I had guns in a safe in my bedroom from 10 years old. I had the key and ammo. Again, someone else's rights arent based on your approval. POST: Yeah its not just about my approval, pretty sure the majority of people in the U.S are against open carrying an AR. No one sees someone carrying a long gun in public and thinks wow look at them go, so glad they are exercising their rights. Theyre thinking Im glad I have my ccw so I can drop this motherfucker if he sneezes. And youre right, I should just assume that all 14 year olds were taught properly on how to handle firearms even if their parents are pieces of shit. I shouldnt care if he hurts himself or someone else because if I did Id just be infringing in someones rights. Glad your parents believed you wouldnt kill someone with a gun that young. Too bad other parents believed the same thing.
| [
{
"start": 363,
"end": 515,
"label": "hasty generalization"
},
{
"start": 581,
"end": 820,
"label": "ad populum"
},
{
"start": 697,
"end": 1287,
"label": "Appeal to Ridicule"
}
] | [
"Appeal to ridicule: X: 14 years old is old enough to carry gun, X': Ridiculize X",
"Hasty generalization: S=Poster's personnal experience, P=All children, C=Any one can carry guns",
"ad populum: X = many people think that carrying a gun in the streets is bad"
] | {"TITLE: So I have more guns than I'd like to admit, but I feel like a lot of people shouldn't own guns.": [["nothing"]], "POST: The drunk guy I agree with, however the other two are perfectly fine.": [["nothing"]], "Most states have laws against carry while drinking.": [["nothing"]], "Someone choosing to open carry an AR isnt subject to your approval.": [["nothing"]], "They dont need you to think their are cool to exercise a right.": [["nothing"]], "14 year olds are plenty old enough to be around loaded guns.": [["hasty generalization"]], "They arent 4.": [["hasty generalization"]], "I had guns in a safe in my bedroom from 10 years old.": [["hasty generalization"]], "I had the key and ammo.": [["hasty generalization"]], "Again, someone else's rights arent based on your approval.": [["nothing"]], "POST:": [["nothing"]], "Yeah its not just about my approval, pretty sure the majority of people in the U.S are against open carrying an AR.": [["ad populum"]], "No one sees someone carrying a long gun in public and thinks wow look at them go, so glad they are exercising their rights.": [["ad populum"], ["appeal to ridicule"]], "Theyre thinking Im glad I have my ccw so I can drop this motherfucker if he sneezes.": [["appeal to ridicule"]], "And youre right, I should just assume that all 14 year olds were taught properly on how to handle firearms even if their parents are pieces of shit.": [["appeal to ridicule"]], "I shouldnt care if he hurts himself or someone else because if I did Id just be infringing in someones rights.": [["appeal to ridicule"]], "Glad your parents believed you wouldnt kill someone with a gun that young.": [["appeal to ridicule"]], "Too bad other parents believed the same thing.": [["appeal to ridicule"]]} |
TITLE: PewDiePie is a racist piece of shit POST: > pewdiepie is extremely racist and very anti Semitic A) The use of"extremely" and"very" is hyperbolical bullshit. You know it and I know it. Please stop. B) There is nothing wrong with being racist or anti Semitic. Being tribal is a normal part of being human.
| [
{
"start": 207,
"end": 310,
"label": "appeal to nature"
},
{
"start": 207,
"end": 310,
"label": "appeal to tradition"
},
{
"start": 207,
"end": 310,
"label": "equivocation"
},
{
"start": 207,
"end": 310,
"label": "false analogy"
}
] | [
"Appeal to tradition: X: Being tribal is a normal part of being human.",
"Equivocation: A=Tribal as a small group of human, B=Tribal as rejecting all other tribes (almost synonymous to racist)",
"False analogy: X: Racism and antisemitism are not wrong, Y: Being tribal is normal",
"appeal to nature: X = Being ... | {"TITLE: PewDiePie is a racist piece of shit POST: > pewdiepie is extremely racist and very anti Semitic A) The use of\"extremely\" and\"very\" is hyperbolical bullshit.": [["nothing"]], "You know it and I know it.": [["nothing"]], "Please stop.": [["nothing"]], "B)": [["nothing"]], "There is nothing wrong with being racist or anti Semitic.": [["appeal to nature", "false analogy", "equivocation", "appeal to tradition"]], "Being tribal is a normal part of being human.": [["appeal to nature", "false analogy", "equivocation", "appeal to tradition"]]} |
TITLE: It's not even close to legal POST: I disagree with every comment on this thread. Almost 3k upvotes show that most people agree with me. A furry is not something Ive ever seen in real life and I would not even know the term existed if not for these strange Reddit posts/comments. Its weird, its not socially or mentally healthy, its not a thing. Bring on the downvotes.
| [
{
"start": 88,
"end": 142,
"label": "ad populum"
},
{
"start": 286,
"end": 351,
"label": "ad hominem"
}
] | [
"Ad populum: X: 3k upvotes agree with the poster",
"ad hominem: P1 = another poster said furry is nice, A = people dreassing like giant furries are mentally ill."
] | {"TITLE: It's not even close to legal POST: I disagree with every comment on this thread.": [["nothing"]], "Almost 3k upvotes show that most people agree with me.": [["ad populum"]], "A furry is not something Ive ever seen in real life and I would not even know the term existed if not for these strange Reddit posts/comments.": [["nothing"]], "Its weird, its not socially or mentally healthy, its not a thing.": [["ad hominem"]], "Bring on the downvotes.": [["nothing"]]} |
Even the Republican platform has criticized the lack of leadership in Mr. Ford and they've criticized the foreign policy of this administration. This is one instance where I agree with - with the Republican platform. I might say this in closing, and that is that as far as foreign policy goes, Mr. Kissinger has been the president of this country.
| [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 144,
"label": "appeal to (false) authority"
},
{
"start": 145,
"end": 347,
"label": "ad hominem"
},
{
"start": 145,
"end": 347,
"label": "nothing"
}
] | [
"Appeal to (false) authority: P1: Republican, X: Criticizing the lack of leader in Mr. Ford and the foreign policy of his administration.",
"ad hominem: P1 = Ford, Y = (implicit) vote for me because I'm a great leader, A = Kissinger has been the real leader wrt the foreign policy, hence P1 has no backbone"
] | {"Even the Republican platform has criticized the lack of leadership in Mr. Ford and they've criticized the foreign policy of this administration.": [["appeal to (false) authority"]], "This is one instance where I agree with - with the Republican platform.": [["nothing", "ad hominem"]], "I might say this in closing, and that is that as far as foreign policy goes, Mr. Kissinger has been the president of this country.": [["nothing", "ad hominem"]]} |
TITLE: Weekly General Discussion - March 10, 2019 POST: alex jones is cuckoo bananas and joe organ just lets him ride on like a monkey on a pig with a cowboy hat. he thinks he's just hanging out with a buddy but what he fails to realize is that he has a huge platform with a fan base of highly impressionable young men who feel wronged by society and entitled to scream like a monkey on the back of a pig with a cowboy hat POST: Free speech bad
| [
{
"start": 163,
"end": 422,
"label": "hasty generalization"
},
{
"start": 429,
"end": 444,
"label": "Appeal to Ridicule"
}
] | [
"Appeal to ridicule: P1 = first poster, X = Alex Jones shouldn't be invited by Joe Rogan, X' = sarcasm when saying that free speech is bad, hence Alex Jones should have the right to be on TV",
"Hasty generalization: S=Fan Base, P=Some fan, C=young and impressionable"
] | {"TITLE: Weekly General Discussion - March 10, 2019 POST: alex jones is cuckoo bananas and joe organ just lets him ride on like a monkey on a pig with a cowboy hat.": [["nothing"]], "he thinks he's just hanging out with a buddy but what he fails to realize is that he has a huge platform with a fan base of highly impressionable young men who feel wronged by society and entitled to scream like a monkey on the back of a pig with a cowboy hat": [["hasty generalization"]], "Free speech bad": [["appeal to ridicule"]]} |
Mrs. Miller taught your older brother, who was the class clown. She decides to be strict with you from the very first day of class because she thinks you will be a clown, too.
| [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 175,
"label": "guilt by association"
}
] | [
"guilt by association: P1 = the younger brother, Y = (implicit) P1 is not a clown, P2 = the older brother, A = P2 is a clown"
] | {"Mrs.": [["guilt by association"]], "Miller taught your older brother, who was the class clown.": [["guilt by association"]], "She decides to be strict with you from the very first day of class because she thinks you will be a clown, too.": [["guilt by association"]]} |
TITLE: Is it ideal to live without recreational drugs? POST: Ideal, perhaps for some. However it is highly unrealistic. Mankind has been using"recreational drugs" since we developed agriculture, and probably before too.
| [
{
"start": 120,
"end": 219,
"label": "appeal to tradition"
}
] | [
"appeal to tradition: X = drugs have always been used"
] | {"TITLE: Is it ideal to live without recreational drugs?": [["nothing"]], "POST: Ideal, perhaps for some.": [["nothing"]], "However it is highly unrealistic.": [["nothing"]], "Mankind has been using\"recreational drugs\" since we developed agriculture, and probably before too.": [["appeal to tradition"]]} |
James' mom is concerned when she finds out that he skipped class one day. She tells him that she is concerned that since he skipped one class, he will start skipping more frequently. Then he will drop out altogether, never graduate or get into college, and end up unemployed and living at home for the rest of his life.
| [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 319,
"label": "slippery slope"
}
] | [
"slippery slope: Z = being unemployed, A = skip class one day, B = skip class more frequently, C = drop out of school"
] | {"James' mom is concerned when she finds out that he skipped class one day.": [["slippery slope"]], "She tells him that she is concerned that since he skipped one class, he will start skipping more frequently.": [["slippery slope"]], "Then he will drop out altogether, never graduate or get into college, and end up unemployed and living at home for the rest of his life.": [["slippery slope"]]} |
TITLE: The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus[529x529] POST: So the least corrupt state is anarchy by this logic. This is"deep" libertarian bullshit. Yes, over regulation is a thing, but laws against theft, murder, slavery, child labor, education, etc. are good things - not corruption. POST: > laws against theft, murder, slavery. Good people don't need laws to tell them how to be good, bad people either ignore laws or use/create them to hide behind...
| [
{
"start": 88,
"end": 140,
"label": "Appeal to Ridicule"
},
{
"start": 88,
"end": 140,
"label": "equivocation"
},
{
"start": 141,
"end": 176,
"label": "ad hominem"
},
{
"start": 141,
"end": 176,
"label": "guilt by association"
},
{
"start": 359,
... | [
"Appeal to ridicule: Person 1=OP, X=Less laws is better, Person 2=Poster 1, X'=No laws at all",
"Circular reasoning: X: Good/Bad people are good/bad.",
"False dilemma: X: You are good person if you follow the law, Y: You are a bad person if you don't follow the law",
"Guilt by association: Person 1: OP, Y=Les... | {"TITLE: The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.": [["nothing"]], "- Tacitus[529x529] POST:": [["nothing"]], "So the least corrupt state is anarchy by this logic.": [["equivocation", "appeal to ridicule"]], "This is\"deep\" libertarian bullshit.": [["guilt by association", "ad hominem"]], "Yes, over regulation is a thing, but laws against theft, murder, slavery, child labor, education, etc.": [["nothing"]], "are good things - not corruption.": [["nothing"]], "POST: > laws against theft, murder, slavery.": [["nothing"]], "Good people don't need laws to tell them how to be good, bad people either ignore laws or use/create them to hide behind...": [["circular reasoning", "false dilemma"]]} |
TITLE: Stores should have a few for people who shop after closing POST: I mean 10 minutes after closing isn't really bad at all. POST: Well if 10 minutes isnt bad, then surely 11 is ok. If 11 is ok then 13 is fine. If 13 is fine then whats wrong with 15. You said 15 is ok, 16 is just a minute more. Were at 16, Im finishing up and will be checked out by 18. See how it keeps getting stretched out????? When the goddamned sign says the store closes at 9:00 the fucking customers need to get the fuck out by 8:59. They had all day to get their shit taken care of. At 9 0 0 youre on my time.
| [
{
"start": 135,
"end": 402,
"label": "slippery slope"
},
{
"start": 403,
"end": 562,
"label": "causal oversimplification"
},
{
"start": 403,
"end": 589,
"label": "appeal to anger"
}
] | [
"Appeal to anger: P1: Cashier, X: Outraged by people whom stays in the store till 9:00, when it is the time to close.",
"Slippery Slope: Person 1=Poster, A=10 minutes, B=11 minutes, C=15 minutes, D=18 minutes, Z= really long time",
"causal oversimplification: X = Had all day to go shopping, but didn't go, Y = ... | {"TITLE: Stores should have a few for people who shop after closing POST: I mean 10 minutes after closing isn't really bad at all.": [["nothing"]], "POST:": [["nothing"]], "Well if 10 minutes isnt bad, then surely 11 is ok.": [["slippery slope"]], "If 11 is ok then 13 is fine.": [["slippery slope"]], "If 13 is fine then whats wrong with 15.": [["slippery slope"]], "You said 15 is ok, 16 is just a minute more.": [["slippery slope"]], "Were at 16, Im finishing up and will be checked out by 18.": [["slippery slope"]], "See how it keeps getting stretched out?????": [["slippery slope"]], "When the goddamned sign says the store closes at 9:00 the fucking customers need to get the fuck out by 8:59.": [["causal oversimplification"], ["appeal to anger"]], "They had all day to get their shit taken care of.": [["causal oversimplification"], ["appeal to anger"]], "At 9 0 0 youre on my time.": [["appeal to anger"]]} |
Three congressional representatives have had affairs. Members of Congress are adulterers.
| [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 89,
"label": "hasty generalization"
}
] | [
"hasty gen: P = Members of congress, S = 3 members of Congress had affairs, C = all members of Congress had affairs"
] | {"Three congressional representatives have had affairs.": [["hasty generalization"]], "Members of Congress are adulterers.": [["hasty generalization"]]} |
TITLE: Tennessee Senator calls higher education a'liberal breeding ground,' calls to remove it all together POST: So he's saying liberals are better educated than conservatives. We agree. Trump isn't the only one who loves the poorly educated. POST: Or, more accurately, many liberal professors abuse their positions by attempting to force their political opinions into subjects they don't belong in, like the English professor who insists their students each write a paper on"Why the GOP are terrorists" and grade students poorly who disagree with that opinion (experienced that first hand). Many of the big name institutions have become incestuous single minded orgies which no longer challenge students to think out of the box, challenge assumed truths and seek to learn all they can, but instead have become factories to produce a very specific set of opinions and mindsets never to be questioned. This isn't a call to abolish higher learning, but I think the entire system needs to be reassessed, not only due to outrageous costs and access issues.
| [
{
"start": 114,
"end": 243,
"label": "Appeal to Ridicule"
},
{
"start": 114,
"end": 243,
"label": "equivocation"
},
{
"start": 114,
"end": 243,
"label": "straw man"
},
{
"start": 250,
"end": 592,
"label": "hasty generalization"
},
{
"start": 593,
... | [
"Appeal to ridicule: P1 = Tennessee Senator, X = P1 calls higher education a 'liberal breeding ground', X' = P1 is saying liberals are better educated than conservatives",
"Hasty Generalization: S: English professor, P: Many liberal professors, C: Abuse their positions to force their political opinion.",
"Straw... | {"TITLE: Tennessee Senator calls higher education a'liberal breeding ground,' calls to remove it all together POST:": [["nothing"]], "So he's saying liberals are better educated than conservatives.": [["equivocation", "appeal to ridicule", "straw man"]], "We agree.": [["equivocation", "appeal to ridicule", "straw man"]], "Trump isn't the only one who loves the poorly educated.": [["equivocation", "appeal to ridicule", "straw man"]], "Or, more accurately, many liberal professors abuse their positions by attempting to force their political opinions into subjects they don't belong in, like the English professor who insists their students each write a paper on\"Why the GOP are terrorists\" and grade students poorly who disagree with that opinion (experienced that first hand).": [["hasty generalization"]], "Many of the big name institutions have become incestuous single minded orgies which no longer challenge students to think out of the box, challenge assumed truths and seek to learn all they can, but instead have become factories to produce a very specific set of opinions and mindsets never to be questioned.": [["nothing", "ad hominem"]], "This isn't a call to abolish higher learning, but I think the entire system needs to be reassessed, not only due to outrageous costs and access issues.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: What"healthy" food is actually way more unhealthy than most people think? POST: Incoming comments of things that are nutritious but people don't consider healthy because they're high in calories AND other random shit they read on a blog who's ultimate goal is to convince them to spend money on something at some point. Olive oil is healthy even though it has calories and fruit is healthy even though it has carbs. Dairy and red meat are fine - people have been consuming them for centuries and they did shit like building pyramids using just their hands. You don't need to live off of bland chicken breasts, broccoli, and scrambled eggs to be healthy. Also people need to learn the difference between added sugar and natural sugar. The sugar in fruit is not the same sugar in candy bars. I think one of the biggest reasons for the obesity epidemic in America is the over-complication of nutrition. A new food is"unhealthy" every week.
| [
{
"start": 87,
"end": 326,
"label": "Appeal to Ridicule"
},
{
"start": 87,
"end": 326,
"label": "straw man"
},
{
"start": 423,
"end": 563,
"label": "appeal to tradition"
},
{
"start": 564,
"end": 660,
"label": "straw man"
},
{
"start": 797,
"en... | [
"Appeal to ridicule: Person 1=OP/Other Poster, X=Some food are unhealthy, Person 2=Poster, X'=Some random blog is saying that a food is unhealthy so it is",
"Appeal to tradition: X=eating meat (ancestor=up to the egyptian)",
"Causal oversimplification: X: Oversimplifcation of nutrition, Y: Biggest reason for t... | {"TITLE: What\"healthy\" food is actually way more unhealthy than most people think?": [["nothing"]], "POST:": [["nothing"]], "Incoming comments of things that are nutritious but people don't consider healthy because they're high in calories AND other random shit they read on a blog who's ultimate goal is to convince them to spend money on something at some point.": [["appeal to ridicule", "straw man"]], "Olive oil is healthy even though it has calories and fruit is healthy even though it has carbs.": [["nothing"]], "Dairy and red meat are fine - people have been consuming them for centuries and they did shit like building pyramids using just their hands.": [["appeal to tradition"]], "You don't need to live off of bland chicken breasts, broccoli, and scrambled eggs to be healthy.": [["straw man"]], "Also people need to learn the difference between added sugar and natural sugar.": [["nothing"]], "The sugar in fruit is not the same sugar in candy bars.": [["nothing"]], "I think one of the biggest reasons for the obesity epidemic in America is the over-complication of nutrition.": [["causal oversimplification"], ["appeal to ridicule"]], "A new food is\"unhealthy\" every week.": [["appeal to ridicule"]]} |
TITLE: There are now traffic cameras that can spot you using your phone while driving POST: Distracted driving is a HUGE problem but the fact that people are begging for a state run mass surveillance system is terrifying. It may seem innocuous and even helpful at first but the implications are tremendous. These are the first steps towards mass facial recognition and social credit systems... and people are clamoring for it. Its crazy.
| [
{
"start": 92,
"end": 426,
"label": "appeal to fear"
},
{
"start": 92,
"end": 426,
"label": "slippery slope"
}
] | [
"Appeal to fear: X=Refuse surveillance of driver, Y=accepting mass surveillance and social credit",
"slippery slope: A = traffic cameras, B = mass surveillance, C = facial recognition, D = social credits"
] | {"TITLE: There are now traffic cameras that can spot you using your phone while driving POST:": [["nothing"]], "Distracted driving is a HUGE problem but the fact that people are begging for a state run mass surveillance system is terrifying.": [["slippery slope", "appeal to fear"]], "It may seem innocuous and even helpful at first but the implications are tremendous.": [["slippery slope", "appeal to fear"]], "These are the first steps towards mass facial recognition and social credit systems...": [["slippery slope", "appeal to fear"]], "and people are clamoring for it.": [["slippery slope", "appeal to fear"]], "Its crazy.": [["nothing"]]} |
"The Cardinals are the best football team because they're better than all the other teams. They're better than all the other teams because they're the best."
| [
{
"start": 1,
"end": 156,
"label": "circular reasoning"
}
] | [
"Circular Reasoning: X: The Cardinals are the best football team, Y: They are the best"
] | {"The Cardinals are the best football team because they're better than all the other teams.": [["circular reasoning"]], "They're better than all the other teams because they're the best.": [["circular reasoning"]]} |
TITLE: Thirty years of fast food: Greater variety, but more salt, larger portions, and added calories are potentially fueling the obesity epidemic, according to a new study. Despite the addition of some healthy menu items, fast food is even more unhealthy for you than it was 30 years ago. POST: But did they check slow food? Dollars to donuts that eating at an average restaurant is unhealthier than 30 years ago by an even wider margin. Fast food isn't fueling the obesity epidemic; FOOD is fueling the obesity epidemic. POST: Let's not forget Genetically Modified foods. They are not on our food chain.
| [
{
"start": 296,
"end": 438,
"label": "appeal to worse problems"
},
{
"start": 439,
"end": 522,
"label": "causal oversimplification"
},
{
"start": 439,
"end": 522,
"label": "nothing"
},
{
"start": 529,
"end": 605,
"label": "appeal to nature"
}
] | [
"Appeal to nature: X: GM is not in our food chain.",
"Appeal to worse problem: S=Fast food is worse than 30 years ago, B=Restauration is worse than 30 years ago (which we don't talk about thus this is worse)",
"causal oversimplification: X = Food, Y = obesity epidemic, A = genetics, B = physical activity levels... | {"TITLE: Thirty years of fast food: Greater variety, but more salt, larger portions, and added calories are potentially fueling the obesity epidemic, according to a new study.": [["nothing"]], "Despite the addition of some healthy menu items, fast food is even more unhealthy for you than it was 30 years ago.": [["nothing"]], "POST:": [["nothing"]], "But did they check slow food?": [["appeal to worse problems"]], "Dollars to donuts that eating at an average restaurant is unhealthier than 30 years ago by an even wider margin.": [["appeal to worse problems"]], "Fast food isn't fueling the obesity epidemic; FOOD is fueling the obesity epidemic.": [["causal oversimplification", "nothing"]], "Let's not forget Genetically Modified foods.": [["appeal to nature"]], "They are not on our food chain.": [["appeal to nature"]]} |
TITLE: Should I [23F] urge my husband [26M] to stop watching porn? POST: Yes. Porn has gained the support of popular culture, but it is unhealthy. It has been shown to make men more sexually aggressive, dissatisfied with their own sex lives, and contributes to the global sex trade. Viewing porn also causes prolonged dopamine exposure, which the brain will build resistance against - making it more difficult to feel joy from other daily activities. Porn is also highly addictive, and has diminishing returns over time, so a user will have to watch more porn, or more extreme porn, to get the same amount of dopamine. Check [fightthenewdrug.org](<URL>) for studies on the harmful effects of pornography. POST: Yeah, I always go to religious organizations to supply me with clear and objective scientific studies...
| [
{
"start": 711,
"end": 815,
"label": "Appeal to Ridicule"
}
] | [
"Appeal to ridicule: Person 1=OP, X=You should not watch adult videos because of negative consequences (addictive, ...), Person 2=Poster, X'=Religious, thus really biased, organisation, claims theses consequences"
] | {"TITLE: Should I [23F] urge my husband [26M] to stop watching porn?": [["nothing"]], "POST: Yes.": [["nothing"]], "Porn has gained the support of popular culture, but it is unhealthy.": [["nothing"]], "It has been shown to make men more sexually aggressive, dissatisfied with their own sex lives, and contributes to the global sex trade.": [["nothing"]], "Viewing porn also causes prolonged dopamine exposure, which the brain will build resistance against - making it more difficult to feel joy from other daily activities.": [["nothing"]], "Porn is also highly addictive, and has diminishing returns over time, so a user will have to watch more porn, or more extreme porn, to get the same amount of dopamine.": [["nothing"]], "Check [fightthenewdrug.org](<URL>) for studies on the harmful effects of pornography.": [["nothing"]], "POST:": [["nothing"]], "Yeah, I always go to religious organizations to supply me with clear and objective scientific studies...": [["appeal to ridicule"]]} |
I merely say that the United States should meet its commitments to Que- to uh - Formosa and the Pescadores. But as Admiral Yarnell has said, and he's been supported by most military authority, these islands that we're now talking about are not worth the bones of a single American soldier; and I know how difficult it is to sustain troops close to the shore under artillery bombardment. And therefore, I think, we should make it very clear the disagreement between Mr. Nixon and myself.
| [
{
"start": 108,
"end": 386,
"label": "appeal to (false) authority"
}
] | [
"Appeal to authority: P1 = Admiral Yarnell, Y = these islands that we're now talking about\n are not worth the bones of a single American soldier"
] | {"I merely say that the United States should meet its commitments to Que- to uh - Formosa and the Pescadores.": [["nothing"]], "But as Admiral Yarnell has said, and he's been supported by most military authority, these islands that we're now talking about are not worth the bones of a single American soldier; and I know how difficult it is to sustain troops close to the shore under artillery bombardment.": [["appeal to (false) authority"]], "And therefore, I think, we should make it very clear the disagreement between Mr. Nixon and myself.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: There is no good reason to take stories/accounts of miracles seriously POST: > There is no good reason to take stories/accounts of miracles seriously I propose that for a modern account of a miracle, if the person telling you the account is trustworthy, that is a reason to take the account seriously.
| [
{
"start": 147,
"end": 156,
"label": "to clean"
},
{
"start": 157,
"end": 308,
"label": "appeal to (false) authority"
},
{
"start": 157,
"end": 308,
"label": "causal oversimplification"
},
{
"start": 157,
"end": 308,
"label": "circular reasoning"
}
] | [
"Causal Oversimplification: X=Person 1 see a miraculous even, Y=This is an actual miracle, A=Some actual physical events look miraculous, B=The unlikely event may have occured due to chance, C=There are caused that are unkwown by Person 1",
"Circular Reasoning: X: Person is telling you the account is trusthworthy... | {"TITLE: There is no good reason to take stories/accounts of miracles seriously POST: > There is no good reason to take stories/accounts of miracles": [["nothing"]], "I propose that for a modern account of a miracle, if the person telling you the account is trustworthy, that is a reason to take the account seriously.": [["causal oversimplification", "appeal to (false) authority", "circular reasoning"]]} |
He has smoked cigarettes his entire life and he doesn't have lung cancer. Therefore smoking doesn't cause lung cancer.
| [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 118,
"label": "hasty generalization"
}
] | [
"Hasty generalization: P=People smoking, S=One smoker, C= Smoking don't cause cancer"
] | {"He has smoked cigarettes his entire life and he doesn't have lung cancer.": [["hasty generalization"]], "Therefore smoking doesn't cause lung cancer.": [["hasty generalization"]]} |
Clearly, uh it was maybe the right thing to do, but we did not go in with enough information. We caused problems in the first place by denying Caribbean countries and third-world countries a chance to trade freely in the United States. It causes economic problems and turmoil, and then we turn around, as we did in Mexico, having to bail them out. We caused the problem in the first place, and it cost us 20 to 50 billion to bail them out.
| [
{
"start": 236,
"end": 347,
"label": "causal oversimplification"
},
{
"start": 236,
"end": 347,
"label": "false analogy"
}
] | [
"Causal oversimplification: X: Poblems caused by US in the Caribbean countries and third-world countries Y: Economic problems and turmoil.",
"false analogy= X = Caribbean countries and third-world countries, Y = Mexico, P = X and Y have the same issues for the same reasons (ignoring their respective histories)"
] | {"Clearly, uh it was maybe the right thing to do, but we did not go in with enough information.": [["nothing"]], "We caused problems in the first place by denying Caribbean countries and third-world countries a chance to trade freely in the United States.": [["nothing"]], "It causes economic problems and turmoil, and then we turn around, as we did in Mexico, having to bail them out.": [["causal oversimplification", "false analogy"]], "We caused the problem in the first place, and it cost us 20 to 50 billion to bail them out.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: London doctor objects to city's $880 fine calling it'punitive' POST: Punitive: inflicting punishment, punishing Seems about right. Fines are punishments. Calling a fine"punitive" is like calling a textbook"educational". The gov't has been going all out to educate people. Anyone who still doesn't know the rules by now just isn't bothering to educate themselves. POST: Yeah, this doctor is a moron. Not smart like you.
| [
{
"start": 376,
"end": 425,
"label": "Appeal to Ridicule"
},
{
"start": 376,
"end": 425,
"label": "ad hominem"
}
] | [
"Ad hominem: Person 1=Poster 1, Y=The doctor should know the rules, he deserve it, Person 2=Poster 2, A=Doctor is stupid (sarcasm: Person 1 think that he is better than a doctor, but he is not)",
"Appeal to ridicule: P1 = first poser, X = the doctor is dumb, X' = the second poster use sarcasm to say that it is P1... | {"TITLE: London doctor objects to city's $880 fine calling it'punitive' POST: Punitive: inflicting punishment, punishing Seems about right.": [["nothing"]], "Fines are punishments.": [["nothing"]], "Calling a fine\"punitive\" is like calling a textbook\"educational\".": [["nothing"]], "The gov't has been going all out to educate people.": [["nothing"]], "Anyone who still doesn't know the rules by now just isn't bothering to educate themselves.": [["nothing"]], "POST:": [["nothing"]], "Yeah, this doctor is a moron.": [["ad hominem", "appeal to ridicule"]], "Not smart like you.": [["ad hominem", "appeal to ridicule"]]} |
Lola: I don't think John would be a good fit to manage this project, because he doesn't have a lot of experience with project management. John: But you don't have a lot of experience in project management either!
| [
{
"start": 144,
"end": 212,
"label": "tu quoque"
}
] | [
"tu quoque: P1 = Lola, X = John has no experience with project management, P2 = John, Y = Lola either has no experience"
] | {"Lola: I don't think John would be a good fit to manage this project, because he doesn't have a lot of experience with project management.": [["nothing"]], "John:": [["nothing"]], "But you don't have a lot of experience in project management either!": [["tu quoque"]]} |
TITLE: Trans people in UK could face rape charges if they don't reveal gender history. POST: Rightly so. I don't care how it makes trans people feel, the vast majority of people would want to know if someone was born a different sex to that which they're passing themselves off as.
| [
{
"start": 93,
"end": 281,
"label": "ad populum"
}
] | [
"ad populum: X = the vast majority of people would want to know if someone was born a different sex to that which they're passing themselves off as."
] | {"TITLE: Trans people in UK could face rape charges if they don't reveal gender history.": [["nothing"]], "POST:": [["nothing"]], "Rightly so.": [["ad populum"]], "I don't care how it makes trans people feel, the vast majority of people would want to know if someone was born a different sex to that which they're passing themselves off as.": [["ad populum"]]} |
TITLE: Hanging pork with garlic sauce... or as my sister called it,"laundry over dirt field" POST: Well it's common in Sichuan where this dish is originated from to serve it like this, so it's not a stupid restaurant plating thing it's how it should be
| [] | [] | {"TITLE: Hanging pork with garlic sauce...": [["nothing"]], "or as my sister called it,\"laundry over dirt field\" POST: Well it's common in Sichuan where this dish is originated from to serve it like this, so it's not a stupid restaurant plating thing it's how it should be\n": [["nothing"]]} |
And judgment is what we look for in the president of the United States of America. I'm proud that important military figures who are supporting me in this race: former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff John Shalikashvili; just yesterday, General Eisenhower's son, General John Eisenhower, endorsed me; General Admiral William Crown; General Tony McBeak, who ran the Air Force war so effectively for his father -- all believe I would make a stronger commander in chief. And they believe it because they know I would not take my eye off of the goal: Osama bin Laden.
| [
{
"start": 417,
"end": 568,
"label": "appeal to (false) authority"
}
] | [
"appeal to authority: P1 = all cited generals, Y = the speaker will be a great commender in chief"
] | {"And judgment is what we look for in the president of the United States of America.": [["nothing"]], "I'm proud that important military figures who are supporting me in this race: former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff John Shalikashvili; just yesterday, General Eisenhower's son, General John Eisenhower, endorsed me; General Admiral William Crown; General Tony McBeak, who ran the Air Force war so effectively for his father --": [["nothing"]], "all believe I would make a stronger commander in chief.": [["appeal to (false) authority"]], "And they believe it because they know I would not take my eye off of the goal: Osama bin Laden.": [["appeal to (false) authority"]]} |
Fred, the German, stole my wallet. Therefore, all Germans are thieves.
| [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 70,
"label": "hasty generalization"
}
] | [
"hasty gen: P = all Germans, S = Fred who is German and stoll a waller, C = all Germans are thieves"
] | {"Fred, the German, stole my wallet.": [["hasty generalization"]], "Therefore, all Germans are thieves.": [["hasty generalization"]]} |
Slavery is accepted by just about everyone in our society, so it's ethical to keep slaves.
| [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 90,
"label": "ad populum"
}
] | [
"ad populum: X = slavery is accepted by everybody"
] | {"Slavery is accepted by just about everyone in our society, so it's ethical to keep slaves.": [["ad populum"]]} |
TITLE: Need identify 2 lost parts. Dell inspiron 15 5577
POST: Hi, those are SMD components. You need a parts list or a donor board. EDIT: The good news is they will be cheap, the bad news is you need someone who can do smd soldering, which, for no good reason, is a dark art. Check out Lewis Rossman on youtube to see tutorials, but it will require expensive kit, unless you can borrow some.
POST: I live in not rich country here more good repair specialist. I see on motherboard 4 types of smd components already with identification. But they very similar. Thanks | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Need identify 2 lost parts.": [["nothing"]], "Dell inspiron 15 5577\r\nPOST: Hi, those are SMD components.": [["nothing"]], "You need a parts list or a donor board.": [["nothing"]], "EDIT: The good news is they will be cheap, the bad news is you need someone who can do smd soldering, which, for no good reason, is a dark art.": [["nothing"]], "Check out Lewis Rossman on youtube to see tutorials, but it will require expensive kit, unless you can borrow some.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I live in not rich country here more good repair specialist.": [["nothing"]], "I see on motherboard 4 types of smd components already with identification.": [["nothing"]], "But they very similar.": [["nothing"]], "Thanks": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Innisfree?
POST: I just picked up one of the tinted balms and it's a really lovely product. Nice tint, smooth, stays on.
POST: Is the color really obvious? I prefer non tint | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Innisfree?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I just picked up one of the tinted balms and it's a really lovely product.": [["nothing"]], "Nice tint, smooth, stays on.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Is the color really obvious?": [["nothing"]], "I prefer non tint": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: EXTRA! EXTRA!
POST: When Reddit can't get more unoriginal
POST: Have you not know that this poster is extremely popular in Oculus sub reddit? He creates those "news" papers every time there is some big news and people love it. Just look at the points in linked thread | [
{
"start": 73,
"end": 150,
"label": "ad populum"
}
] | [
"ad populum: X = a poster is very popular, therefore his work is original"
] | {"TITLE: EXTRA!": [["nothing"]], "EXTRA!": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: When Reddit can't get more unoriginal\r\nPOST:": [["nothing"]], "Have you not know that this poster is extremely popular in Oculus sub reddit?": [["ad populum"]], "He creates those \"news\" papers every time there is some big news and people love it.": [["nothing"]], "Just look at the points in linked thread": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: G751JM. What the hell now? Please help. Is the laptop dead? Thank you, have a nice day
POST: Enter Bios and see if your hdd is detected. If it is, might be an issue with boot order. Else try this: <URL>
POST: Thanks, but what should I enter? Could you tell me step by step because I have no idea what you just said. Thanks for the help though | [] | [] | {"TITLE: G751JM.": [["nothing"]], "What the hell now?": [["nothing"]], "Please help.": [["nothing"]], "Is the laptop dead?": [["nothing"]], "Thank you, have a nice day\r\nPOST: Enter Bios and see if your hdd is detected.": [["nothing"]], "If it is, might be an issue with boot order.": [["nothing"]], "Else try this: <URL>\r\nPOST: Thanks, but what should I enter?": [["nothing"]], "Could you tell me step by step because I have no idea what you just said.": [["nothing"]], "Thanks for the help though": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: New Firefox Update
POST: Dog software on cat hardware
POST: Wouldn't it be the other way around? Since it looks like a dog and behaves like a cat. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: New Firefox Update\r\nPOST: Dog software on cat hardware\r\nPOST: Wouldn't it be the other way around?": [["nothing"]], "Since it looks like a dog and behaves like a cat.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Proof that Bots are manipulating the Rotten Tomatoes Audience score of The Last Jedi
POST: Doesn't prove anything. Could just be an error. Most people I spoke to didn't like TLJ, so if anything, it should have a lower than 55% score.
POST: Every IRL person I know loves it, all the hate coming from the internet. Anecdotal evidence works both ways | [
{
"start": 147,
"end": 241,
"label": "hasty generalization"
}
] | [
"hasty gen: P = all people, S = people that spoke with poster 1 hate the movie, C = the movie should have a low score"
] | {"TITLE: Proof that Bots are manipulating the Rotten Tomatoes Audience score of The Last Jedi\r\nPOST: Doesn't prove anything.": [["nothing"]], "Could just be an error.": [["nothing"]], "Most people I spoke to didn't like TLJ, so if anything, it should have a lower than 55% score.": [["hasty generalization"]], "\nPOST: Every IRL person I know loves it, all the hate coming from the internet.": [["nothing"]], "Anecdotal evidence works both ways": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Legion is the best overall expac we will ever get and here is why
POST: This feels like definite nostalgia talking to me. Off the top of my head legiondaries were pretty bad bc it took so long to be able to target them. I remember getting the one I wanted for a character about a week before BFA dropped and not really being able to use it. Also was never really a fan of the AP grind tho I did love having my weapon always guaranteed. Order halls were also super hit or miss for me and I hated the rogue one. Spent most of my time in the Maelstrom and I liked it tho.
POST: i think people focus too much on legendary acquisition and forgot how good the other parts of the xpac were. there werent many complaints at all except for legendary acquisition | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Legion is the best overall expac we will ever get and here is why\r\nPOST: This feels like definite nostalgia talking to me.": [["nothing"]], "Off the top of my head legiondaries were pretty bad bc it took so long to be able to target them.": [["nothing"]], "I remember getting the one I wanted for a character about a week before BFA dropped and not really being able to use it.": [["nothing"]], "Also was never really a fan of the AP grind tho I did love having my weapon always guaranteed.": [["nothing"]], "Order halls were also super hit or miss for me and I hated the rogue one.": [["nothing"]], "Spent most of my time in the Maelstrom and I liked it tho.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: i think people focus too much on legendary acquisition and forgot how good the other parts of the xpac were.": [["nothing"]], "there werent many complaints at all except for legendary acquisition": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: People who are into dark humor, where do you draw the line?
POST: I don't make fun of anyone's parents dying. I don't know, it's just a thing with me because I've been helping orphans for a long time and their mental health is seriously fucked up because of it.
POST: It's very poor taste at the funeral. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: People who are into dark humor, where do you draw the line?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I don't make fun of anyone's parents dying.": [["nothing"]], "I don't know, it's just a thing with me because I've been helping orphans for a long time and their mental health is seriously fucked up because of it.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: It's very poor taste at the funeral.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Doctors have dismissed my symptoms, but I promise I'm not crazy
POST: I'm not a doctor, but I have lupus. It sounds like lupus to me. Did you get ANA and ENA tests? I had to beg for them and then the doctors were all miffed because I proved I was sick. Good luck.
POST: I got those tests and they came back fine, I was so confident that it was lupus for a while but that negative test has really thrown me ! | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Doctors have dismissed my symptoms, but I promise I'm not crazy\r\nPOST: I'm not a doctor, but I have lupus.": [["nothing"]], "It sounds like lupus to me.": [["nothing"]], "Did you get ANA and ENA tests?": [["nothing"]], "I had to beg for them and then the doctors were all miffed because I proved I was sick.": [["nothing"]], "Good luck.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I got those tests and they came back fine, I was so confident that it was lupus for a while but that negative test has really thrown me !": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Armed Citizen Shoots, Kills Active Shooter At Tulsa Shopping Center.
POST: So a woman got in an altercation, got mad and grabbed a gun and starting shooting, and was then shot by someone else.
POST: The whole situation wouldn't have happened if she didnt have easy access to a gun | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Armed Citizen Shoots, Kills Active Shooter At Tulsa Shopping Center.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: So a woman got in an altercation, got mad and grabbed a gun and starting shooting, and was then shot by someone else.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: The whole situation wouldn't have happened if she didnt have easy access to a gun": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Gay trump supporter talks real big about his experience storming the capitol until he realizes there are consequences to his actions.
POST: I get that it's weird that someone from the lgbtq+community supports fascists who want people like him to die, but I don't see his sexual identity having any relevance to this story.
POST: It isn't particularly relevant, but instinct magazine strictly covers LGBT stories, so for them it is. Also as a gay man, I get extra jollies from the intense irony of him being a gay trump supporter. Its not necessary for the story but it certainly enhances it. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Gay trump supporter talks real big about his experience storming the capitol until he realizes there are consequences to his actions.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I get that it's weird that someone from the lgbtq+community supports fascists who want people like him to die, but I don't see his sexual identity having any relevance to this story.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: It isn't particularly relevant, but instinct magazine strictly covers LGBT stories, so for them it is.": [["nothing"]], "Also as a gay man, I get extra jollies from the intense irony of him being a gay trump supporter.": [["nothing"]], "Its not necessary for the story but it certainly enhances it.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Ned, the actor behind Micheal, was recently admitted in the hospital for Covid Pneumonia, hoping for his good health and be well soon
POST: First we nearly lost Dr. Dre now we might lose Michael. This is getting progressively worse, I hope he pulls through. I'm sure he will tho
POST: I almost forgot about Dre | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Ned, the actor behind Micheal, was recently admitted in the hospital for Covid Pneumonia, hoping for his good health and be well soon\r\nPOST: First we nearly lost Dr. Dre now we might lose Michael.": [["nothing"]], "This is getting progressively worse, I hope he pulls through.": [["nothing"]], "I'm sure he will tho\r\nPOST: I almost forgot about Dre": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Why is there so much turmoil towards the pharmaceutical industry among the general public ? And do professionals in this field feel the same way about the field ?
POST: It's an industry like any other. The outrage is mostly aimed at outrageous pricing for their products *in America*. That's not the fault of that industry at the core, it's the fault of a political system allowing it. We don't suffer from that where I live, and we get our medicine from the same industry. And you have to keep one thing in mind, development of medications is brutally expensive. That leads to another problem. The industry wants to make profit, and consequently directs their efforts at products that will sell well. Medication for rare conditions will never recoup the development cost and consequently don't get researched. That's another systemic problem.
POST: many people have been calling out science subreddit mods like mvea etc for spamming "shill articles" etc. And I've begun to question it myself after seeing so many clickbait articles around on r/science. Are those claims true ? | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Why is there so much turmoil towards the pharmaceutical industry among the general public ?": [["nothing"]], "And do professionals in this field feel the same way about the field ?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: It's an industry like any other.": [["nothing"]], "The outrage is mostly aimed at outrageous pricing for their products *in America*.": [["nothing"]], "That's not the fault of that industry at the core, it's the fault of a political system allowing it.": [["nothing"]], "We don't suffer from that where I live, and we get our medicine from the same industry.": [["nothing"]], "And you have to keep one thing in mind, development of medications is brutally expensive.": [["nothing"]], "That leads to another problem.": [["nothing"]], "The industry wants to make profit, and consequently directs their efforts at products that will sell well.": [["nothing"]], "Medication for rare conditions will never recoup the development cost and consequently don't get researched.": [["nothing"]], "That's another systemic problem.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: many people have been calling out science subreddit mods like mvea etc for spamming \"shill articles\" etc.": [["nothing"]], "And I've begun to question it myself after seeing so many clickbait articles around on r/science.": [["nothing"]], "Are those claims true ?": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: What was your 'I don't get paid enough for this' moment at work?
POST: My boss insisted that everybody be at their desks at 8:30 sharp. She made me take roll on an attendance sheet and hand it into her everyday. She also made me do it at lunch time (when everybody left and came back) and when they left at night. Took roll for a bunch of adults three times a day. I don't work there anymore.
POST: Oh man, I'm actually relieved, because I had to do this same shit to my subordinates, and honestly I made up numbers 99% of the time because they worked their full hours and could prove it, and their performance was the best in the office because they weren't being crushed by an asshole dictator. I left after I was told to follow my subordinates to the bathroom to time their breaks in there, and one of my team was a pregnant woman. When I objected, I was told by the highest management that I was immature, not a team player, and I had to do exactly everything I was told, no questions asked. No exaggeration, those are direct quotes. I made sure my folks were covered and handed in my resignation. After I left, my friends there told me that a bunch of other people walked too. It was a great place to work for my first two years, but the manager had never held that position, was stubborn, and hated millennials, and so went out of her way to be horrible to her own staff. No ragerts, yo. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: What was your 'I don't get paid enough for this' moment at work?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: My boss insisted that everybody be at their desks at 8:30 sharp.": [["nothing"]], "She made me take roll on an attendance sheet and hand it into her everyday.": [["nothing"]], "She also made me do it at lunch time (when everybody left and came back) and when they left at night.": [["nothing"]], "Took roll for a bunch of adults three times a day.": [["nothing"]], "I don't work there anymore.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Oh man, I'm actually relieved, because I had to do this same shit to my subordinates, and honestly I made up numbers 99% of the time because they worked their full hours and could prove it, and their performance was the best in the office because they weren't being crushed by an asshole dictator.": [["nothing"]], "I left after I was told to follow my subordinates to the bathroom to time their breaks in there, and one of my team was a pregnant woman.": [["nothing"]], "When I objected, I was told by the highest management that I was immature, not a team player, and I had to do exactly everything I was told, no questions asked.": [["nothing"]], "No exaggeration, those are direct quotes.": [["nothing"]], "I made sure my folks were covered and handed in my resignation.": [["nothing"]], "After I left, my friends there told me that a bunch of other people walked too.": [["nothing"]], "It was a great place to work for my first two years, but the manager had never held that position, was stubborn, and hated millennials, and so went out of her way to be horrible to her own staff.": [["nothing"]], "No ragerts, yo.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Teaching my 6 year old sister how to play dbd is amazing and incredibly frustrating as well
POST: 6 is a bit too young, especially a game about killing people
POST: Hey tell her that she sees me play this daily and she wanted me to teach her how | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Teaching my 6 year old sister how to play dbd is amazing and incredibly frustrating as well\r\nPOST: 6 is a bit too young, especially a game about killing people\r\nPOST: Hey tell her that she sees me play this daily and she wanted me to teach her how": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: This duck got trapped under the ice (xpost from /r/nonononoyes)
POST: I don't think this poor duck was being helped
POST: No. They were being hunted. Please take this down u/the_ebb_and_flow | [] | [] | {"TITLE: This duck got trapped under the ice (xpost from /r/nonononoyes)\r\nPOST: I don't think this poor duck was being helped\r\nPOST: No. They were being hunted.": [["nothing"]], "Please take this down u/the_ebb_and_flow": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Gregory Maxwell is still convinced that a 1mb block size limit was good for Bitcoin adoption.
POST: They are backward like that. Best we move on with the solution. Bitcoin Cash proves they were wrong about this and many other things.
POST: well, until it has more tx and more hashpower, not to mention higher price, bch does not prove a damn thing... | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Gregory Maxwell is still convinced that a 1mb block size limit was good for Bitcoin adoption.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: They are backward like that.": [["nothing"]], "Best we move on with the solution.": [["nothing"]], "Bitcoin Cash proves they were wrong about this and many other things.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: well, until it has more tx and more hashpower, not to mention higher price, bch does not prove a damn thing...": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Do you use tire shine?
POST: I think it's more of a practical thing, rather than a preference. A brand new tire is dark black and matte. Yes, that does look great. However after getting some sun a tire turns grey'ish and kind of chalky. It's just cheap and readily available to grab some tire shine and quickly make them dark black and shiny! There may be product out there for dark black and matte, but I'm assuming the shine is just cheaper and more readily available.
POST: Of course there are other products out there. 303, Perl, and others are dressings which are not high shine. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Do you use tire shine?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I think it's more of a practical thing, rather than a preference.": [["nothing"]], "A brand new tire is dark black and matte.": [["nothing"]], "Yes, that does look great.": [["nothing"]], "However after getting some sun a tire turns grey'ish and kind of chalky.": [["nothing"]], "It's just cheap and readily available to grab some tire shine and quickly make them dark black and shiny!": [["nothing"]], "There may be product out there for dark black and matte, but I'm assuming the shine is just cheaper and more readily available.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Of course there are other products out there.": [["nothing"]], "303, Perl, and others are dressings which are not high shine.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Which scenario is the most common when it comes to the reasons women divorce?
POST: Please actually look at the divorce/marriages statistics first:[Here's more statistics on Divorce!](<URL>) * Lack of commitment 73% * Argue too much 56% * Infidelity 55% * Married too young 46% * Unrealistic expectations 45% * Lack of equality in the relationship 44% * Lack of preparation for marriage 41% * [Domestic Violence](<URL>) or Abuse 25% (Respondents often cited more that one reason, therefore the percentages add up to much more than 100 percent)
POST: Wow! That website has some startling statistics on how female sexual history impacts marriage: > - Women who lost their virginity as a teenager are more than twice as likely to get divorced in the first 5 years of marriage than women who waited until age 18 or older. > - Women with 6 or more premarital sexual partners are almost 3 times less likely to be in a stable marriage. Female sexual history obviously plays a big role in the success of marriage. | [
{
"start": 938,
"end": 1014,
"label": "false causality"
}
] | [
"false causality: A = non-traditional sexuality of women, B = increased number of divorce"
] | {"TITLE: Which scenario is the most common when it comes to the reasons women divorce?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Please actually look at the divorce/marriages statistics first:[Here's more statistics on Divorce!](<URL>) * Lack of commitment 73% * Argue too much 56% * Infidelity 55% * Married too young 46% * Unrealistic expectations 45% * Lack of equality in the relationship 44% * Lack of preparation for marriage 41% * [Domestic Violence](<URL>) or Abuse 25% (Respondents often cited more that one reason, therefore the percentages add up to much more than 100 percent)\r\nPOST: Wow!": [["nothing"]], "That website has some startling statistics on how female sexual history impacts marriage: > - Women who lost their virginity as a teenager are more than twice as likely to get divorced in the first 5 years of marriage than women who waited until age 18 or older.": [["nothing"]], "> - Women with 6 or more premarital sexual partners are almost 3 times less likely to be in a stable marriage.": [["nothing"]], "Female sexual history obviously plays a big role in the success of marriage.": [["false causality"]]} |
TITLE: I need help with a debate
POST: What is he saying/rephrasing?
POST: I'll give you an example, I was telling him about how hell is not justifiable in any way. He repeatedly said that sinning against god is the worst sin so it is and he just kept saying it in different ways. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: I need help with a debate\r\nPOST: What is he saying/rephrasing?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I'll give you an example, I was telling him about how hell is not justifiable in any way.": [["nothing"]], "He repeatedly said that sinning against god is the worst sin so it is and he just kept saying it in different ways.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: CMV: The NRA is a terrorist organization, and it would be legal under the Insurrection act for the US to take military action against it
POST: No. The NRA does not use terror to stop common sense laws that would stop those deaths. Background checks are common sense, assault weapon bans are not. With the amount of weapons in the USA and the ease of smuggling in the country assault weapon bans wouldn't do anything because you could still get then illegally. The majority of gun deaths don't happen because someone who legally owns a gun does something illegal. The majority of deaths happen because someone who illegally owns a gun does something illegal. Restrictions on acquisitions are not going to stop that. Enforcement of possession laws will stop that and no politician is campaigning to do that. Even though the NRA would presumably be fine with it.
POST: The NRA commits terror by encouraging circumstances and laws which lead to 30,000 deaths a year The majority of gun deaths are carried out by legal gun owners with no criminal records. 20,000 of the 30,000 gun deaths are caused by legal owners who have never been arrested. | [
{
"start": 304,
"end": 467,
"label": "false causality"
},
{
"start": 666,
"end": 813,
"label": "false dilemma"
},
{
"start": 875,
"end": 970,
"label": "appeal to anger"
},
{
"start": 875,
"end": 970,
"label": "appeal to fear"
}
] | [
"Appeal to Fear: X: NRA is comiting terror by suuporting laws related to carrying weapons, Y: They lead to the death of 30,000 persons per year",
"False causality: A = There are a large number of weapons in the USA and there is ease of smuggling in the country, B = Assault weapon bans are ineffective. \nBut it co... | {"TITLE: CMV: The NRA is a terrorist organization, and it would be legal under the Insurrection act for the US to take military action against it\r\nPOST: No. The NRA does not use terror to stop common sense laws that would stop those deaths.": [["nothing"]], "Background checks are common sense, assault weapon bans are not.": [["nothing"]], "With the amount of weapons in the USA and the ease of smuggling in the country assault weapon bans wouldn't do anything because you could still get then illegally.": [["false causality"]], "The majority of gun deaths don't happen because someone who legally owns a gun does something illegal.": [["nothing"]], "The majority of deaths happen because someone who illegally owns a gun does something illegal.": [["nothing"]], "Restrictions on acquisitions are not going to stop that.": [["false dilemma"]], "Enforcement of possession laws will stop that and no politician is campaigning to do that.": [["false dilemma"]], "Even though the NRA would presumably be fine with it.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST:": [["nothing"]], "The NRA commits terror by encouraging circumstances and laws which lead to 30,000 deaths a year": [["appeal to anger", "appeal to fear"]], "The majority of gun deaths are carried out by legal gun owners with no criminal records.": [["nothing"]], "20,000 of the 30,000 gun deaths are caused by legal owners who have never been arrested.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Jason? Welcome to Tarrey Town!
POST: How would you ever forget someone who is allowed in Tarrey Town
POST: Exactly! JaSON moves to Tarrey Town and sells um... cargo shorts. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Jason?": [["nothing"]], "Welcome to Tarrey Town!": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: How would you ever forget someone who is allowed in Tarrey Town\r\nPOST: Exactly!": [["nothing"]], "JaSON moves to Tarrey Town and sells um...": [["nothing"]], "cargo shorts.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: I wonder why...
POST: If a child rapist is sent to prison do you think I'm gonna care if someone does the same to them?
POST: What about the criminals who aren't child rapists? What about the men who go to prison because they couldn't pay child support? What about men imprisoned due to false accusations? What about men in prison due to drugs or theft or anything else non-sexual? Do they deserve it too? | [] | [] | {"TITLE: I wonder why...": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: If a child rapist is sent to prison do you think I'm gonna care if someone does the same to them?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: What about the criminals who aren't child rapists?": [["nothing"]], "What about the men who go to prison because they couldn't pay child support?": [["nothing"]], "What about men imprisoned due to false accusations?": [["nothing"]], "What about men in prison due to drugs or theft or anything else non-sexual?": [["nothing"]], "Do they deserve it too?": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: How is it possible for someone who says he is a liberal to also believe in gun rights and having fiscally responsible government?
POST: Because contrary to what the major political parties and media want you to believe, not everyone fits into boxes.
POST: Everyone fits into boxes, just sometimes they're boxes with only one person in. Politics isn't broad-strokes. It's extremely individualized. This is why I don't get along with many leftists despite being very far left myself. | [] | [
"It could have been an equivocation if it was a proper argument (boxes = social group VS boxes = a collection of indiviuals).",
"The second post is not really argumentative. It is strange that he argue with a reformulation of the first post, which adds nothing to the debate. However it is not explicitly fallaciou... | {"TITLE: How is it possible for someone who says he is a liberal to also believe in gun rights and having fiscally responsible government?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Because contrary to what the major political parties and media want you to believe, not everyone fits into boxes.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Everyone fits into boxes, just sometimes they're boxes with only one person in.": [["nothing"]], "Politics isn't broad-strokes.": [["nothing"]], "It's extremely individualized.": [["nothing"]], "This is why I don't get along with many leftists despite being very far left myself.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: 2020 Super Twosday Discussion Live Thread - Part V
POST: Young people who do not vote should be shamed. What can we do to get more young people involved? The barriers today are much less than any other time in history, eg women and people of color segregation and disenfranchisement
POST: Get older people to stop shaming young people and voting for their own old ass candidates. | [
{
"start": 65,
"end": 290,
"label": "causal oversimplification"
},
{
"start": 65,
"end": 290,
"label": "nothing"
}
] | [
"causal oversimplification: X = much less barriers, Y = young people should vote, A = young people can feel they are not represented by politics"
] | {"TITLE: 2020 Super Twosday Discussion Live Thread - Part V\r\nPOST:": [["nothing"]], "Young people who do not vote should be shamed.": [["causal oversimplification", "nothing"]], "What can we do to get more young people involved?": [["causal oversimplification", "nothing"]], "The barriers today are much less than any other time in history, eg women and people of color segregation and disenfranchisement": [["causal oversimplification", "nothing"]], "\nPOST: Get older people to stop shaming young people and voting for their own old ass candidates.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Slayer's Dave Lombardo Shares Opinion on Metallica's Lars Ulrich
POST: I'm not a musician so bear with me here. Why the constant debate about Lars' skills? If a successful band in any genre was based only on the very best technical players there would only be a handful of bands out there to listen to right?
POST: It is fair to say that Lars, in the grand scheme of heavy metal drummers, ranks lower when it comes to technical skills, especially compared to the likes of Lombardo or Menza, and his drumming has only gotten lazier and sloppier with time. However, the drumming on the first four albums, especially AFJA, was pretty solid. The fact is, Lars is responsible for some of the most memorable drum parts in metal (like the machine gun double bass part in One) and he is absolutely indispensable to the songwriting process with James. Lars, Kirk and even Cliff have all been criticized for their technical skills, but their creativity, along with James (who is an excellent songwriter and rhythm guitarist), was what made Metallica the greatest metal band of all time, not their chops. | [
{
"start": 852,
"end": 1102,
"label": "causal oversimplification"
},
{
"start": 852,
"end": 1102,
"label": "nothing"
}
] | [
"Causal oversimplification: X: Creativity, Y: Metallica the greatest metal band of all time"
] | {"TITLE: Slayer's Dave Lombardo Shares Opinion on Metallica's Lars Ulrich\r\nPOST: I'm not a musician so bear with me here.": [["nothing"]], "Why the constant debate about Lars' skills?": [["nothing"]], "If a successful band in any genre was based only on the very best technical players there would only be a handful of bands out there to listen to right?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: It is fair to say that Lars, in the grand scheme of heavy metal drummers, ranks lower when it comes to technical skills, especially compared to the likes of Lombardo or Menza, and his drumming has only gotten lazier and sloppier with time.": [["nothing"]], "However, the drumming on the first four albums, especially AFJA, was pretty solid.": [["nothing"]], "The fact is, Lars is responsible for some of the most memorable drum parts in metal (like the machine gun double bass part in One) and he is absolutely indispensable to the songwriting process with James.": [["nothing"]], "Lars, Kirk and even Cliff have all been criticized for their technical skills, but their creativity, along with James (who is an excellent songwriter and rhythm guitarist), was what made Metallica the greatest metal band of all time, not their chops.": [["causal oversimplification", "nothing"]]} |
TITLE: China like the interview,but who is Dr.Lobster?
POST: It's a reference to Peterson. He claimed that hierarchies are good because lobsters have hierarchies as well so it's natural.
POST: He claimed hierarchies are natural, since we can trace hierarchies to lobsters. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: China like the interview,but who is Dr.Lobster?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: It's a reference to Peterson.": [["nothing"]], "He claimed that hierarchies are good because lobsters have hierarchies as well so it's natural.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: He claimed hierarchies are natural, since we can trace hierarchies to lobsters.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: [Max Payne 3] Think max might be popping too many painkillers at this point tbh
POST: Max payne had plenty of glitchy craziness, loved it though
POST: Max Payne 3 is such a hidden gem. The story is awful compared to the previous two games, but the gameplay is fucking fantastic. The multiplayer was really fun too. Also, this game has the best flip-flop sandal physics I've ever seen in a videogame thus far. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: [Max Payne 3] Think max might be popping too many painkillers at this point tbh\r\nPOST: Max payne had plenty of glitchy craziness, loved it though\r\nPOST: Max Payne 3 is such a hidden gem.": [["nothing"]], "The story is awful compared to the previous two games, but the gameplay is fucking fantastic.": [["nothing"]], "The multiplayer was really fun too.": [["nothing"]], "Also, this game has the best flip-flop sandal physics I've ever seen in a videogame thus far.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Scandinavians of reddit: a lot of the internet thinks you live in a perfect fantasy utopia. What are some issues affecting your countries that the world should know about?
POST: I've lived in Denmark for two years. People are pretty difficult to get close to there (quite introverted) so you can easily end up being lonely. The political correctness can be annoying too if you happen to have different political views than most Scandinavians.
POST: Spot on with the political correctness. I have a couple of quite liberal viewpoints (weed and prostitution should be legal etc), and if my family found out they'd probably all think I was the devil in disguise. Having an opinion that goes against the grain here is not appreciated in the least. You say we have issues with our immigration policies? You're a racist. You say weed should be legal? You're trying to kill our children with drugs. You don't want to go to university just so you can use your diploma to become a cashier? You're a lazy bum who will never succeed at anything | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Scandinavians of reddit: a lot of the internet thinks you live in a perfect fantasy utopia.": [["nothing"]], "What are some issues affecting your countries that the world should know about?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I've lived in Denmark for two years.": [["nothing"]], "People are pretty difficult to get close to there (quite introverted) so you can easily end up being lonely.": [["nothing"]], "The political correctness can be annoying too if you happen to have different political views than most Scandinavians.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Spot on with the political correctness.": [["nothing"]], "I have a couple of quite liberal viewpoints (weed and prostitution should be legal etc), and if my family found out they'd probably all think I was the devil in disguise.": [["nothing"]], "Having an opinion that goes against the grain here is not appreciated in the least.": [["nothing"]], "You say we have issues with our immigration policies?": [["nothing"]], "You're a racist.": [["nothing"]], "You say weed should be legal?": [["nothing"]], "You're trying to kill our children with drugs.": [["nothing"]], "You don't want to go to university just so you can use your diploma to become a cashier?": [["nothing"]], "You're a lazy bum who will never succeed at anything": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Thinking about getting a bearded dragon so I'm gonna start my research right here in this subreddit.
POST: Let me stop you right there...getting information from this subreddit is a sure fire way to ensure you have absolutely no clue what to do. What will happen is you're going to start an argument between 100 different internet "experts" all convinced they know what's best for you. Use veterinary sources to guide your thinking.
POST: Alright good to know, thanks. But maybe you can help me out with one thing, there are so many pictures with people using paper towels instead of substrate. Is that at least a thing everybody is okay with? | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Thinking about getting a bearded dragon so I'm gonna start my research right here in this subreddit.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Let me stop you right there...getting information from this subreddit is a sure fire way to ensure you have absolutely no clue what to do.": [["nothing"]], "What will happen is you're going to start an argument between 100 different internet \"experts\" all convinced they know what's best for you.": [["nothing"]], "Use veterinary sources to guide your thinking.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Alright good to know, thanks.": [["nothing"]], "But maybe you can help me out with one thing, there are so many pictures with people using paper towels instead of substrate.": [["nothing"]], "Is that at least a thing everybody is okay with?": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: 'Blow Up the Phones': Demands That #BoltonMustTestify Surge After New Revelations About Ukrainian Aid Freeze. "We are citizens of the United States of America, and we must indeed unite together to stop this GOP cover-up."
POST: Cover up of what?
POST: Trump using taxpayer dollars appropriated by Congress to bribe Ukraine into helping his reelection campaign | [] | [] | {"TITLE: 'Blow Up the Phones': Demands That #BoltonMustTestify Surge After New Revelations About Ukrainian Aid Freeze.": [["nothing"]], "\"We are citizens of the United States of America, and we must indeed unite together to stop this GOP cover-up.\"\r\nPOST: Cover up of what?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Trump using taxpayer dollars appropriated by Congress to bribe Ukraine into helping his reelection campaign": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Yes, this is a poll about raiding and instances.
POST: There is a compromise: Popped bosses. You do a bunch of stuff/farming/crafting to assemble an item that will spawn the boss in the open world. It will automatically be claimed by the group that spawns it. Is it still possible to grief? Yes, but it's more limited. On another note, then I would like to see stuff like BCNMs from FFXI.
POST: I like this a lot, though I still would like to see a lockout timer for the party that spawns it. Only because, while the requirement may seem intense and unrepeatable when it's first discovered, inevitably raiding guilds will amass the supplies to farm the item, and thus the boss, and will need to be slowed down. But otherwise, I think this is a great way to let a group try the raid when they're ready on their own time, without being punished by raid guilds. :) Now, I never played FFXI; what are BCNMs? | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Yes, this is a poll about raiding and instances.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: There is a compromise: Popped bosses.": [["nothing"]], "You do a bunch of stuff/farming/crafting to assemble an item that will spawn the boss in the open world.": [["nothing"]], "It will automatically be claimed by the group that spawns it.": [["nothing"]], "Is it still possible to grief?": [["nothing"]], "Yes, but it's more limited.": [["nothing"]], "On another note, then I would like to see stuff like BCNMs from FFXI.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I like this a lot, though I still would like to see a lockout timer for the party that spawns it.": [["nothing"]], "Only because, while the requirement may seem intense and unrepeatable when it's first discovered, inevitably raiding guilds will amass the supplies to farm the item, and thus the boss, and will need to be slowed down.": [["nothing"]], "But otherwise, I think this is a great way to let a group try the raid when they're ready on their own time, without being punished by raid guilds.": [["nothing"]], ":) Now, I never played FFXI; what are BCNMs?": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: What is going on with my toenails?! It is painful, it is ugly and I am so ready to be rid of it.
POST: I'd say it's damage of scarring of the nail bed by trauma (long time standing and poor fitting shoes). You can see from the ridges of the nail that it's become thickened in response to the trauma. Nothing much you can really do my friend apart from having the nail removed (which I did as mine were much worse that yours).
POST: Thank you for answering - how was it to get the nails removed? Did it hurt at all - or is it like when you get teeth removed and it just feels very, very strange? And I completely agree that this wont go away on its own. Should I try the GP/doctor again or find a specialist foot doctor? | [] | [] | {"TITLE: What is going on with my toenails?!": [["nothing"]], "It is painful, it is ugly and I am so ready to be rid of it.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I'd say it's damage of scarring of the nail bed by trauma (long time standing and poor fitting shoes).": [["nothing"]], "You can see from the ridges of the nail that it's become thickened in response to the trauma.": [["nothing"]], "Nothing much you can really do my friend apart from having the nail removed (which I did as mine were much worse that yours).": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Thank you for answering - how was it to get the nails removed?": [["nothing"]], "Did it hurt at all - or is it like when you get teeth removed and it just feels very, very strange?": [["nothing"]], "And I completely agree that this wont go away on its own.": [["nothing"]], "Should I try the GP/doctor again or find a specialist foot doctor?": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Was happy to receive my first ThinkPad which is a T450. eBay posting was wrong and listed it as a 1920x1080 display and I knew right away it wasn't.
POST: So if it was advertised with the 1080p screen, but doesn't have that, you could get a refund and return it - "not as described" - or, contact the vendor and negotiate a rebate.
POST: Im hoping I can negotiate a rebate because Id prefer to keep the machine and upgrade the screen myself | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Was happy to receive my first ThinkPad which is a T450.": [["nothing"]], "eBay posting was wrong and listed it as a 1920x1080 display and I knew right away it wasn't.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: So if it was advertised with the 1080p screen, but doesn't have that, you could get a refund and return it - \"not as described\" - or, contact the vendor and negotiate a rebate.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Im hoping I can negotiate a rebate because Id prefer to keep the machine and upgrade the screen myself": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: This may get me cancelled
POST: tl;dr: rushed and rejected from one sorority, should I rush another? Answer: yes
POST: I'll correct you lol because I don't want it to look spiteful and NPHC's demeanor towards Greek life is a little different... TL;DR: rushed and rejected from one sorority, didn't like how the chapter handles themselves as a whole, should I rush another sorority that may align with my views better even if they are "rivals". | [] | [] | {"TITLE: This may get me cancelled\r\nPOST: tl;dr: rushed and rejected from one sorority, should I rush another?": [["nothing"]], "Answer: yes\r\nPOST: I'll correct you lol because I don't want it to look spiteful and NPHC's demeanor towards Greek life is a little different...": [["nothing"]], "TL;DR: rushed and rejected from one sorority, didn't like how the chapter handles themselves as a whole, should I rush another sorority that may align with my views better even if they are \"rivals\".": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Teachers
POST: 1 month late, but taught every grade from 4th to 12th at any given point in 4 years as a teacher
POST: You taught 4 different grades per year?? | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Teachers\r\nPOST: 1 month late, but taught every grade from 4th to 12th at any given point in 4 years as a teacher\r\nPOST: You taught 4 different grades per year??": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: What makes a people think they're smart, when they really aren't?
POST: confirmation bias.
POST: Yeah, what he said. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: What makes a people think they're smart, when they really aren't?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: confirmation bias.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Yeah, what he said.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Buy and sell in SD?
POST: 1. Craigslist 2. Your stuff isn't worth nearly as much as you think 3. You may end up having to pay somebody to haul some of your stuff away 4. Again, craiglist 'gigs' is a good place to find somebody to pay to haul your 'valuables' away
POST: Thank you! Needed a bit of grounding during the move out anxiety haha. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Buy and sell in SD?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: 1.": [["nothing"]], "Craigslist 2.": [["nothing"]], "Your stuff isn't worth nearly as much as you think 3.": [["nothing"]], "You may end up having to pay somebody to haul some of your stuff away 4.": [["nothing"]], "Again, craiglist 'gigs' is a good place to find somebody to pay to haul your 'valuables' away\r\nPOST: Thank you!": [["nothing"]], "Needed a bit of grounding during the move out anxiety haha.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: In mid-December, a model from the CA government predicted 75K COVID hospitalizations by mid-January, steep growth from the 16K then hospitalized. Yesterday, CA had less than 21K COVID hospitalizations.
POST: In all honesty have we seen one single Covid related model turn out to be correct or even close in the past 10 months?
POST: Every one I remember seeing has proven itself to be between 50% and 90% overstated. Our death counts ended up being 10% of what the models were forecasting. One of the cities here went from three overflow hospitals to finding locations for one back in April, then only building a permanent one which has never been staffed. They claim they don't have the personnel to staff them....despite the state's NG being given authorization from our governor to send its stock of nurses and doctors to do it. It makes me wonder of it was just the usual bureaucratic waste or if they've got a future use in mind for the facility... | [
{
"start": 342,
"end": 498,
"label": "hasty generalization"
},
{
"start": 342,
"end": 498,
"label": "nothing"
},
{
"start": 666,
"end": 840,
"label": "causal oversimplification"
},
{
"start": 666,
"end": 840,
"label": "equivocation"
},
{
"start": 8... | [
"Causal oversimplification: X: not having the personnel to staff them despite the stock of nurses and doctors. Y: Empty hospital. A: Diffculty to recruit",
"Equivocation: A=They can't hire staff, T1=staff, M1=permanent personnel, B=They have authorization to get the stock of nurses and doctors (the staff), T2=sto... | {"TITLE: In mid-December, a model from the CA government predicted 75K COVID hospitalizations by mid-January, steep growth from the 16K then hospitalized.": [["nothing"]], "Yesterday, CA had less than 21K COVID hospitalizations.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: In all honesty have we seen one single Covid related model turn out to be correct or even close in the past 10 months?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST:": [["nothing"]], "Every one I remember seeing has proven itself to be between 50% and 90% overstated.": [["hasty generalization", "nothing"]], "Our death counts ended up being 10% of what the models were forecasting.": [["hasty generalization", "nothing"]], "One of the cities here went from three overflow hospitals to finding locations for one back in April, then only building a permanent one which has never been staffed.": [["nothing"]], "They claim they don't have the personnel to staff them....despite the state's NG being given authorization from our governor to send its stock of nurses and doctors to do it.": [["causal oversimplification", "equivocation"]], "It makes me wonder of it was just the usual bureaucratic waste or if they've got a future use in mind for the facility...": [["false dilemma"]]} |
TITLE: High-calorie sandwiches?
POST: Peanut... butter...??? Also you could drizzle olive oil on bread and toast it to increase calorie intake. Use brioche bread (super high calorie and unhealthy)
POST: I dont like peanut butter unfortunately, I like your olive oil idea though. Thanks! | [] | [] | {"TITLE: High-calorie sandwiches?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Peanut...": [["nothing"]], "butter...???": [["nothing"]], "Also you could drizzle olive oil on bread and toast it to increase calorie intake.": [["nothing"]], "Use brioche bread (super high calorie and unhealthy)\r\nPOST: I dont like peanut butter unfortunately, I like your olive oil idea though.": [["nothing"]], "Thanks!": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Has anyone spent a lot of time using spaced repetition notecards (like with Anki, etc.), particularly with reviewing blunders on your games?
POST: FWIW I remember this podcast episode where the guest talked about using notecards <URL>
POST: Came here to comment this. I think she said she got the trick from John Bartholomew. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Has anyone spent a lot of time using spaced repetition notecards (like with Anki, etc.), particularly with reviewing blunders on your games?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: FWIW I remember this podcast episode where the guest talked about using notecards <URL>\r\nPOST: Came here to comment this.": [["nothing"]], "I think she said she got the trick from John Bartholomew.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Political double standard
POST: The mustard thing really drives me crazy because he was at a deli. He wasn't at some persons house calling them trash when they didn't have his preferred condiment, they're supposed to have that stuff. It's like getting mad at someone when they ask for marinara at a pizza joint.
POST: What gets me the most about the whole thing is Hannity trying to make Obama sound all elite and fancy and out of touch for wanting dijon mustard. Dijon mustard isn't even fancy or special or anything. It's like $2 a jar. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Political double standard\r\nPOST: The mustard thing really drives me crazy because he was at a deli.": [["nothing"]], "He wasn't at some persons house calling them trash when they didn't have his preferred condiment, they're supposed to have that stuff.": [["nothing"]], "It's like getting mad at someone when they ask for marinara at a pizza joint.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: What gets me the most about the whole thing is Hannity trying to make Obama sound all elite and fancy and out of touch for wanting dijon mustard.": [["nothing"]], "Dijon mustard isn't even fancy or special or anything.": [["nothing"]], "It's like $2 a jar.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: What makes you play this over post scriptum?
POST: I feel like HLL is more of a hardcore BF where as PS looks more like Arma Lite. I want to enjoy a shooter with team work and strategy on a large scale. I like the relatively fast paced gameplay, less down time, more engagements, smaller maps and leathal weapons make for epic flanks, as a result i feel like as a single player i can have a decent impact on a game - i just enjoy the pacing and the way combat plays out (im nervous that the infantry vehicles will fuck this up). I'll admit that PS's wider range of factions does look very attractive but at the end of the day whats the point in having all these unique and interesting guns and what not when for most of the game you arent going to be using them because your going to be on the move and then when you do its spamming suppressing fire at a hedge. Edit: to be clear i might be 100% wrong about PS i havent played it but thats just the vibe i got from the gameplay ive seen.
POST: You havent played but are talking about it like this? Oof | [
{
"start": 1003,
"end": 1060,
"label": "tu quoque"
}
] | [
"tu quoque: P1 = first poster, X = claiming things about PS, Y = P1 didn't played PS"
] | {"TITLE: What makes you play this over post scriptum?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I feel like HLL is more of a hardcore BF where as PS looks more like Arma Lite.": [["nothing"]], "I want to enjoy a shooter with team work and strategy on a large scale.": [["nothing"]], "I like the relatively fast paced gameplay, less down time, more engagements, smaller maps and leathal weapons make for epic flanks, as a result i feel like as a single player i can have a decent impact on a game - i just enjoy the pacing and the way combat plays out (im nervous that the infantry vehicles will fuck this up).": [["nothing"]], "I'll admit that PS's wider range of factions does look very attractive but at the end of the day whats the point in having all these unique and interesting guns and what not when for most of the game you arent going to be using them because your going to be on the move and then when you do its spamming suppressing fire at a hedge.": [["nothing"]], "Edit: to be clear i might be 100% wrong about PS i havent played it but thats just the vibe i got from the gameplay ive seen.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST:": [["nothing"]], "You havent played but are talking about it like this?": [["tu quoque"]], "Oof": [["tu quoque"]]} |
TITLE: What if the trait is humanity?
POST: Circular/tautological reasoning. You're assuming your conclusion to be true in yoir premises, and the argument doesn't move* in any direction. > P1: Humans have moral value. (Conclusion assumed in premises.) > P2: Humans are human. (Tautology.) > C: Humans have moral value.
POST: It's not circular at all because NTT doesn't revolve around proving human moral value. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: What if the trait is humanity?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Circular/tautological reasoning.": [["nothing"]], "You're assuming your conclusion to be true in yoir premises, and the argument doesn't move* in any direction.": [["nothing"]], "> P1: Humans have moral value.": [["nothing"]], "(Conclusion assumed in premises.) > P2: Humans are human.": [["nothing"]], "(Tautology.) > C: Humans have moral value.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: It's not circular at all because NTT doesn't revolve around proving human moral value.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Got this 41 year old Soviet electronic calculator back up and running, just needed new caps!
POST: Awesome! Now make it say boobs.
POST: / Buffer overflow (The Russian word (*bufyer* or *boofer*) can mean both "buffer" and "boob"; the connection is via railroad buffers, the twin shock absorbers used to dampen the impact of a train car hitting a stop.) | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Got this 41 year old Soviet electronic calculator back up and running, just needed new caps!": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Awesome!": [["nothing"]], "Now make it say boobs.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: / Buffer overflow (The Russian word (*bufyer* or *boofer*) can mean both \"buffer\" and \"boob\"; the connection is via railroad buffers, the twin shock absorbers used to dampen the impact of a train car hitting a stop.)": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: NFL Player wants NFL to consider permitting marijuana use for pain management
POST: question, both medical marijuana and adderall are both banned NFL substances. Adderall is allowed with a prescription, so why wouldn't medical marijuana be allowed with a prescription if a player is in a state where medical marijuana is legal? edit. /u/btbrian makes a great point. "For one thing, it would inherently give players in states where it is legal an edge if it does have performance related (pain management) effects like they claim"
POST: NFL is a national organization and most likely follow federal laws. Lots of companies in green states don't allow marijuana use because of that or because they can still just make it their policy | [] | [] | {"TITLE: NFL Player wants NFL to consider permitting marijuana use for pain management\r\nPOST: question, both medical marijuana and adderall are both banned NFL substances.": [["nothing"]], "Adderall is allowed with a prescription, so why wouldn't medical marijuana be allowed with a prescription if a player is in a state where medical marijuana is legal?": [["nothing"]], "edit.": [["nothing"]], "/u/btbrian makes a great point.": [["nothing"]], "\"For one thing, it would inherently give players in states where it is legal an edge if it does have performance related (pain management) effects like they claim\"\r\nPOST: NFL is a national organization and most likely follow federal laws.": [["nothing"]], "Lots of companies in green states don't allow marijuana use because of that or because they can still just make it their policy": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: In search of a dog groomer experienced with anxious dogs
POST: There is a place off republic road called Fetch. You can bathe your dog there and they provide brushes, towels, shampoo. If you go on Wednesday it is half price for dog wash Wednesday.
POST: Oh man, I completely forgot that they make those wash your own pet here things. Thanks for the reminder, going to go this week. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: In search of a dog groomer experienced with anxious dogs\r\nPOST: There is a place off republic road called Fetch.": [["nothing"]], "You can bathe your dog there and they provide brushes, towels, shampoo.": [["nothing"]], "If you go on Wednesday it is half price for dog wash Wednesday.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Oh man, I completely forgot that they make those wash your own pet here things.": [["nothing"]], "Thanks for the reminder, going to go this week.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Master of Magic : Master of No Magic
POST: Loooool. Their immunity is so op. I thought this was going to be a warlord war trolls run or something from the title
POST: This playthrough came about because someone asked if I had ever thought about playing a game with no books. You can get no books, but it screws up some of the retort picks ( you can only have 6). So you end up taking channeler and having to lose out on a better pick like artificer/conjurer/famous. | [] | [
"to clean: CHANGE"
] | {"TITLE: Master of Magic : Master of No Magic\r\nPOST: Loooool.": [["nothing"]], "Their immunity is so op.": [["nothing"]], "I thought this was going to be a warlord war trolls run or something from the title\r\nPOST: This playthrough came about because someone asked if I had ever thought about playing a game with no books.": [["nothing"]], "You can get no books, but it screws up some of the retort picks ( you can only have 6).": [["nothing"]], "So you end up taking channeler and having to lose out on a better pick like artificer/conjurer/famous.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Can we consider humans as an invasive specie?
POST: Not by definition. [<URL>](<URL>)
POST: Interesting article and thanks for sharing, but let me to be skeptic about: *" 3) An invasive species is introduced to a new habitat: Humans move themselves; there is no outside entity facilitating their spread.* *4) An invasive species had adverse effects on its new habitat and/or on human health: Humans meet this part of the definition in too many ways to count. "* If we observe the increase level of [world population](<URL>), and we observe in [Google Maps](<URL>) how cities and towns are growing their [urban areas](<URL>), and all the impacts in climate change especially about the [consumption of natural resources](<URL>) , I think it is a possibility to consider humans are invasive species. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Can we consider humans as an invasive specie?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Not by definition.": [["nothing"]], "[<URL>](<URL>)\r\nPOST: Interesting article and thanks for sharing, but let me to be skeptic about: *\" 3) An invasive species is introduced to a new habitat: Humans move themselves; there is no outside entity facilitating their spread.* *4) An invasive species had adverse effects on its new habitat and/or on human health: Humans meet this part of the definition in too many ways to count.": [["nothing"]], "\"* If we observe the increase level of [world population](<URL>), and we observe in [Google Maps](<URL>) how cities and towns are growing their [urban areas](<URL>), and all the impacts in climate change especially about the [consumption of natural resources](<URL>) , I think it is a possibility to consider humans are invasive species.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: The sex offender registry should only be for people for individuals who pose a risk to the safety of others. Not some 16 year old who sent a dick pic!
POST: Imagine being a horny naive 16 year old. You were talking to a girl, you guys exchange nudes. You're 21. It's been revealed to other adults that you sent a picture of your dick (nice cock btw). You're on the sex offender registry. You will get almost all job offers turned down. Your life is fucked because someone decided your life should be shit for being a horny teenager.
POST: 21 year old aren't teenagers | [
{
"start": 165,
"end": 540,
"label": "Appeal to Ridicule"
},
{
"start": 548,
"end": 576,
"label": "straw man"
}
] | [
"Appeal to Ridicule: Person 1=people who support the regulation, X=Any person who send a unrequested sexual picture should be registered as sex offender, Person 2=Poster, X'=Any person who send sexual pictures should be registered as sex offender (which include consenting teenagers)",
"straw man: P1 = first poste... | {"TITLE: The sex offender registry should only be for people for individuals who pose a risk to the safety of others.": [["nothing"]], "Not some 16 year old who sent a dick pic!": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST:": [["nothing"]], "Imagine being a horny naive 16 year old.": [["appeal to ridicule"]], "You were talking to a girl, you guys exchange nudes.": [["appeal to ridicule"]], "You're 21.": [["appeal to ridicule"]], "It's been revealed to other adults that you sent a picture of your dick (nice cock btw).": [["appeal to ridicule"]], "You're on the sex offender registry.": [["appeal to ridicule"]], "You will get almost all job offers turned down.": [["appeal to ridicule"]], "Your life is fucked because someone decided your life should be shit for being a horny teenager.": [["appeal to ridicule"]], "21 year old aren't teenagers": [["straw man"]]} |
TITLE: [For Hire] Computer Science Grad.
POST: Have you talked to a local recruiter? They can often place you in a position that fits your skills.
POST: No not yet, have any recommendations? | [] | [] | {"TITLE: [For Hire] Computer Science Grad.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Have you talked to a local recruiter?": [["nothing"]], "They can often place you in a position that fits your skills.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: No not yet, have any recommendations?": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: I looked it up the tweet does not lie the traitor did indeed take a fat one
POST: let's not use homophobia as an insult, okay?
POST: Dude its a porn parody about a homophobe | [] | [] | {"TITLE: I looked it up the tweet does not lie the traitor did indeed take a fat one\r\nPOST: let's not use homophobia as an insult, okay?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Dude its a porn parody about a homophobe": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: No mans sky performance "quest"ions
POST: try setting VRCompositor and VRServer priority to real time from task manager. this seems to be a general solution for microstuttering in certain pcs. also make sure the Nvidia in-game overlay is disabled (geforce experience setting)
POST: do i have to have vr on to find these settings? | [] | [] | {"TITLE: No mans sky performance \"quest\"ions\r\nPOST: try setting VRCompositor and VRServer priority to real time from task manager.": [["nothing"]], "this seems to be a general solution for microstuttering in certain pcs.": [["nothing"]], "also make sure the Nvidia in-game overlay is disabled (geforce experience setting)\r\nPOST: do i have to have vr on to find these settings?": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Dolly's Braces
POST: [Nerdy girl with pigtails and braces is a common stereotype](<URL>). Dolly looks very similar to that stereotype, thus people get the details mixed up. That said, this is one of the best MEs around as it would fit really well together with Jaws, so it's weird that they didn't use braces in the movie.
POST: That's a pretty big "thus" you've thrown into the mix there. If this was just people getting details mixed up, the Mandela Effect would not sustain the interest it has. | [
{
"start": 399,
"end": 506,
"label": "ad populum"
}
] | [
"ad populum: A lot of people have interest in Mandela Effect, thus Mandela Effect is true"
] | {"TITLE: Dolly's Braces\r\nPOST: [Nerdy girl with pigtails and braces is a common stereotype](<URL>).": [["nothing"]], "Dolly looks very similar to that stereotype, thus people get the details mixed up.": [["nothing"]], "That said, this is one of the best MEs around as it would fit really well together with Jaws, so it's weird that they didn't use braces in the movie.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: That's a pretty big \"thus\" you've thrown into the mix there.": [["nothing"]], "If this was just people getting details mixed up, the Mandela Effect would not sustain the interest it has.": [["ad populum"]]} |
TITLE: Any suggestions on good conspiracy books?
POST: Not really conspiracy-related, but I'd recommend *"The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark" by Carl Sagan*, as it explains methods to help distinguish between ideas that are considered valid science, and ideas that can be considered pseudoscience.
POST: Sagan doesn't really go into history as much as he talks about the history of pseudoscience. It is better to learn something like the [Trivium method](<URL>) before doing your own research. The Trivium method gives a great toolset for anybody to learn and research for themselves. It is also very helpful to learn about [fallacies](<URL>), as well. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Any suggestions on good conspiracy books?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Not really conspiracy-related, but I'd recommend *\"The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark\" by Carl Sagan*, as it explains methods to help distinguish between ideas that are considered valid science, and ideas that can be considered pseudoscience.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Sagan doesn't really go into history as much as he talks about the history of pseudoscience.": [["nothing"]], "It is better to learn something like the [Trivium method](<URL>) before doing your own research.": [["nothing"]], "The Trivium method gives a great toolset for anybody to learn and research for themselves.": [["nothing"]], "It is also very helpful to learn about [fallacies](<URL>), as well.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: What's something that you like, but hate the fan base?
POST: Anime. Every time I find one that I like. I mention it to other people and then they feel the need to shit on whatever I'm watching and say I should watch something else because it's better.
POST: Honestly, as an anime fan, i haven't really experienced this. It may be my group of friends or something being less combative about anime that they like, but i only come across the occasional person like that when i mention black clover really. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: What's something that you like, but hate the fan base?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Anime.": [["nothing"]], "Every time I find one that I like.": [["nothing"]], "I mention it to other people and then they feel the need to shit on whatever I'm watching and say I should watch something else because it's better.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Honestly, as an anime fan, i haven't really experienced this.": [["nothing"]], "It may be my group of friends or something being less combative about anime that they like, but i only come across the occasional person like that when i mention black clover really.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Plant food damage while a Power Mint is activated
POST: It depends on the plant. Some do get boosted, some don't.
POST: I dont think it depends on the plant. Are you sure that you understood my question? Anyway, if you are sure, does Parsnip get boosted? | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Plant food damage while a Power Mint is activated\r\nPOST: It depends on the plant.": [["nothing"]], "Some do get boosted, some don't.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I dont think it depends on the plant.": [["nothing"]], "Are you sure that you understood my question?": [["nothing"]], "Anyway, if you are sure, does Parsnip get boosted?": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Biden's plan increases UI by $1600/month, increase food stamps by 15%, gives every family $3000/yr per child (extra 600 per child if under 6), adds 14 weeks of paid leave, extends the rent moratorium, cuts child poverty in 1/2, and raise the minimum wage to $15. Why are leftists STILL mad?
POST: Who is mad about this? What did I miss?
POST: a lot of leftists are mad that its 1400 checks not 2000, because it was meant to supplement the 600 passed in december | [
{
"start": 352,
"end": 470,
"label": "causal oversimplification"
}
] | [
"causal oversimplification: X = Biden's plan with only 1400 checks instead of 2000, Y = leftists are mad, A = punctual measure, B = not enough, etc."
] | {"TITLE: Biden's plan increases UI by $1600/month, increase food stamps by 15%, gives every family $3000/yr per child (extra 600 per child if under 6), adds 14 weeks of paid leave, extends the rent moratorium, cuts child poverty in 1/2, and raise the minimum wage to $15.": [["nothing"]], "Why are leftists STILL mad?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Who is mad about this?": [["nothing"]], "What did I miss?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST:": [["nothing"]], "a lot of leftists are mad that its 1400 checks not 2000, because it was meant to supplement the 600 passed in december": [["causal oversimplification"]]} |
TITLE: Debate on the authenticity of the Qur'an
POST: Yes, there has been a response. Here's a point by point refutation of each claim made, along with full citations listing and quotes: <URL> I'm the author of the paper, so I'd be willing to answer any questions you have.
POST: Did you send this to either of the speakers? Just curious as if you took the time to actually debate each of his points, it'll be interesting to hear both of the speakers thoughts on it. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Debate on the authenticity of the Qur'an\r\nPOST: Yes, there has been a response.": [["nothing"]], "Here's a point by point refutation of each claim made, along with full citations listing and quotes: <URL> I'm the author of the paper, so I'd be willing to answer any questions you have.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Did you send this to either of the speakers?": [["nothing"]], "Just curious as if you took the time to actually debate each of his points, it'll be interesting to hear both of the speakers thoughts on it.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: The Decision Not to Call in the FBI is Looking Worse and Worse
POST: It just doesn't make sense. If Kavanaugh is innocent he should be yelling from the hills demanding an investigation by the FBI.
POST: Let's remember also that *it is a crime to lie to federal law enforcement.* (See Michael Flynn, George Papadapapapolis, Carter Page, etc.) If Dr. Ford *is* lying, then Republicans should be *eager* to get her in front of an FBI interrogator. Can you imagine what kind of huge political win that would be for Republicans? >"Breaking News: 'Me too' Democrat lies to FBI and is facing jail time just weeks before the midterm elections, vindicating Justice Kavanaugh and President Trump in the process. And after that, is political correctness killing your dog? We scream, you decide." | [
{
"start": 105,
"end": 204,
"label": "causal oversimplification"
},
{
"start": 105,
"end": 204,
"label": "false dilemma"
},
{
"start": 351,
"end": 453,
"label": "causal oversimplification"
},
{
"start": 351,
"end": 453,
"label": "false dilemma"
}
] | [
"False Dilemma 2: X=Dr. Ford is Lying and Republican are eager to call FBI, Y=Dr. Ford is not Lying and Republican don't want to call FBI",
"False Dilemma: X=Dr. Ford is Lying and Republican are eager to call FBI, Y=Dr. Ford is not Lying and Republican don't want to call FBI",
"First causal oversimplification: ... | {"TITLE: The Decision Not to Call in the FBI is Looking Worse and Worse\r\nPOST: It just doesn't make sense.": [["nothing"]], "If Kavanaugh is innocent he should be yelling from the hills demanding an investigation by the FBI.": [["causal oversimplification", "false dilemma"]], "\nPOST: Let's remember also that *it is a crime to lie to federal law enforcement.* (See Michael Flynn, George Papadapapapolis, Carter Page, etc.)": [["nothing"]], "If Dr. Ford *is* lying, then Republicans should be *eager* to get her in front of an FBI interrogator.": [["causal oversimplification", "false dilemma"]], "Can you imagine what kind of huge political win that would be for Republicans?": [["nothing"]], ">\"Breaking News: 'Me too' Democrat lies to FBI and is facing jail time just weeks before the midterm elections, vindicating Justice Kavanaugh and President Trump in the process.": [["nothing"]], "And after that, is political correctness killing your dog?": [["nothing"]], "We scream, you decide.\"": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Did not think it was possible
POST: This isn't impossible odds at all. It makes sense that the bar would snap when he was in a position to land, it would be bizarre if it didn't. That's the point at which the most weight is pulling on it, due to gravity.
POST: Would've thought it was designed to resist downwards force more than lateral or upwards though as that's how most people would use it. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Did not think it was possible\r\nPOST: This isn't impossible odds at all.": [["nothing"]], "It makes sense that the bar would snap when he was in a position to land, it would be bizarre if it didn't.": [["nothing"]], "That's the point at which the most weight is pulling on it, due to gravity.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Would've thought it was designed to resist downwards force more than lateral or upwards though as that's how most people would use it.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: I'm writing an essay about putting forth a case to use a Jungian lens when examining and critiquing literature and need help finding a scholarly article or study about why men are interested in things whereas women are interested in people. Must be a biological or psychological article.
POST: I would be more indifferent to this assertion but for the established reality that *some* men use it as a tool to minimize the importance of women's perspective on life, the universe and everything.
POST: Could you clarify this? Not sure if Im interpreting what you are saying correctly Im using it as a point that the Postmodernist lens when critiquing literature doesnt include facts in their analysis. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: I'm writing an essay about putting forth a case to use a Jungian lens when examining and critiquing literature and need help finding a scholarly article or study about why men are interested in things whereas women are interested in people.": [["nothing"]], "Must be a biological or psychological article.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I would be more indifferent to this assertion but for the established reality that *some* men use it as a tool to minimize the importance of women's perspective on life, the universe and everything.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Could you clarify this?": [["nothing"]], "Not sure if Im interpreting what you are saying correctly Im using it as a point that the Postmodernist lens when critiquing literature doesnt include facts in their analysis.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: 74% of voters also say they support the federal government breaking up large technology companies to reduce their power and increase competition and innovation
POST: So what would be the down side of this? I'm just curious if someone could tell me that would be great.
POST: The government has no right to spilt up your business | [
{
"start": 284,
"end": 337,
"label": "appeal to fear"
},
{
"start": 284,
"end": 337,
"label": "nothing"
}
] | [
"Appeal to fear: X=The gouvernement does not have the right to split companies, Y=Otherwise it has the right to split all companies, which attack my personnal rights",
"No right is a strong sentence. I feel like there is an issue with the argument such as appeal to fear : attacking your rights, or strawman: what ... | {"TITLE: 74% of voters also say they support the federal government breaking up large technology companies to reduce their power and increase competition and innovation\r\nPOST: So what would be the down side of this?": [["nothing"]], "I'm just curious if someone could tell me that would be great.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST:": [["nothing"]], "The government has no right to spilt up your business": [["nothing", "appeal to fear"]]} |
TITLE: The Qanon crowd is realizing there's no storm coming
POST: Four years of faith in internet strangers over their own friends and families is ending exactly as expected.
POST: I still don't think the whole QAnon thing was real. I think it was made up by trolls to see how much stupid shit they could get people to believe. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: The Qanon crowd is realizing there's no storm coming\r\nPOST: Four years of faith in internet strangers over their own friends and families is ending exactly as expected.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: I still don't think the whole QAnon thing was real.": [["nothing"]], "I think it was made up by trolls to see how much stupid shit they could get people to believe.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: 'One job should be enough': Marriott hotel workers' strike hits eight US cities
POST: I shouldn't be a race to the bottom, thankless jobs like EMTs should get paid far more than they do now, nobody is saying that minimum wage workers should get paid more than them. To those who argue *well x job pays y amount* do you think that maybe they should get a significant wage hike to so they don't live in poverty either?
POST: > To those who argue well x job pays y amount do you think that maybe they should get a significant wage hike to so they dont live in poverty either? For real, I don't understand why this is so hard for people. But every time I bring this point up, GOP_Fanboy just reverts to "lol who are you to decide who gets paid what communist etc" | [
{
"start": 643,
"end": 768,
"label": "Appeal to Ridicule"
},
{
"start": 643,
"end": 768,
"label": "hasty generalization"
},
{
"start": 643,
"end": 768,
"label": "nothing"
}
] | [
"Appeal to ridicule: Person 1=GOP_Fanboy, X=Increase wage will/could have bad consequences / you need to work hard for the economy, Person 2=Poster, X'=I work hard, i want other to struggle as well",
"hasty gen: P = GOG fanboys, S = some GOP fanboys known by the second poster said that \"one job should be enough\... | {"TITLE: 'One job should be enough': Marriott hotel workers' strike hits eight US cities\r\nPOST: I shouldn't be a race to the bottom, thankless jobs like EMTs should get paid far more than they do now, nobody is saying that minimum wage workers should get paid more than them.": [["nothing"]], "To those who argue *well x job pays y amount* do you think that maybe they should get a significant wage hike to so they don't live in poverty either?": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: > To those who argue well x job pays y amount do you think that maybe they should get a significant wage hike to so they dont live in poverty either?": [["nothing"]], "For real, I don't understand why this is so hard for people.": [["nothing"]], "But every time I bring this point up, GOP_Fanboy just reverts to \"lol who are you to decide who gets paid what communist etc\"": [["hasty generalization", "appeal to ridicule", "nothing"]]} |
TITLE: That rock sounds kinda nice ngl
POST: Apart from the moral issue, "just join the military" does nothing for young people with disabilities or conditions that disqualify them. And before some asshole says something like, "Harhar just lose weight," there are waaaay more disqualifying issues than that and many are totally out of a person's control.
POST: Never thought about this. What about clerical jobs in the army? Every organization needs desk jockeys. Would those just be "normal" jobs, as compared to enlisting in the army? | [] | [] | {"TITLE: That rock sounds kinda nice ngl\r\nPOST: Apart from the moral issue, \"just join the military\" does nothing for young people with disabilities or conditions that disqualify them.": [["nothing"]], "And before some asshole says something like, \"Harhar just lose weight,\" there are waaaay more disqualifying issues than that and many are totally out of a person's control.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Never thought about this.": [["nothing"]], "What about clerical jobs in the army?": [["nothing"]], "Every organization needs desk jockeys.": [["nothing"]], "Would those just be \"normal\" jobs, as compared to enlisting in the army?": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: New Zealand announces official Travel Warning to New Zealanders in the United States due to the upcoming election and civil unrest
POST: This sounds like the sort of thing you hear about Middle East countries not the formerly most powerful nation in the world.
POST: Dictatorships have occurred all throughout history and all corners of the globe. It takes a severe amount of head in the sand to think it can't happen to you. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: New Zealand announces official Travel Warning to New Zealanders in the United States due to the upcoming election and civil unrest\r\nPOST: This sounds like the sort of thing you hear about Middle East countries not the formerly most powerful nation in the world.": [["nothing"]], "\nPOST: Dictatorships have occurred all throughout history and all corners of the globe.": [["nothing"]], "It takes a severe amount of head in the sand to think it can't happen to you.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: Fuck politics
POST: He *does* talk about politics. What JP *doesn't* do is circle jerk with the right. I think that's what you meant to say - "can we stop with the right-wing circle jerk?"
POST: Yeah but i just think if we go into politics, we should go with as little bias as possible and that's not what's happening here. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: Fuck politics\r\nPOST: He *does* talk about politics.": [["nothing"]], "What JP *doesn't* do is circle jerk with the right.": [["nothing"]], "I think that's what you meant to say - \"can we stop with the right-wing circle jerk?\"\r\nPOST: Yeah but i just think if we go into politics, we should go with as little bias as possible and that's not what's happening here.": [["nothing"]]} |
TITLE: What are the most cowardly things a person can do? POST: Refusing to acknowledge that you made a mistake and making excuses instead of being better. We're human. We're flawed - all of us. | [] | [] | {"TITLE: What are the most cowardly things a person can do?": [["nothing"]], "POST: Refusing to acknowledge that you made a mistake and making excuses instead of being better.": [["nothing"]], "We're human.": [["nothing"]], "We're flawed - all of us.": [["nothing"]]} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.