Split (2)

train · 4.64k rows

messages listlengths 2 2
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nAs god of archery, Apollo was known by what name?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAs a god of archery, Apollo was known as Aphetor (/əˈfiːtər/ ə-FEE-tər; Ἀφήτωρ, Aphētōr, from ἀφίημι, \"to let loose\") or Aphetorus (/əˈfɛtərəs/ ə-FET-ər-əs; Ἀφητόρος, Aphētoros, of the same origin), Argyrotoxus (/ˌɑːrdʒᵻrəˈtɒksəs/ AR-ji-rə-TOK-səs; Ἀργυρότοξος, Argyrotoxos, literally \"with silver bow\"), Hecaërgus (/ˌhɛkiˈɜːrɡəs/ HEK-ee-UR-gəs; Ἑκάεργος, Hekaergos, literally \"far-shooting\"), and Hecebolus (/hᵻˈsɛbələs/ hi-SEB-ə-ləs; Ἑκηβόλος, Hekēbolos, literally \"far-shooting\"). The Romans referred to Apollo as Articenens (/ɑːrˈtɪsᵻnənz/ ar-TISS-i-nənz; \"bow-carrying\"). Apollo was called Ismenius (/ɪzˈmiːniəs/ iz-MEE-nee-əs; Ἰσμηνιός, Ismēnios, literally \"of Ismenus\") after Ismenus, the son of Amphion and Niobe, whom he struck with an arrow.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nAphetor, a name also revered by the ancient Egyptians.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds information about the ancient Egyptians revering the name Aphetor, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only provides information about the names of Apollo as a god of archery in Greek and Roman mythology, without any reference to ancient Egyptian reverence.', 'This additional information in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['a name also revered by the ancient Egyptians']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn order to understand the tetraploid forms, what must be used as a comparison in cotton gene sequencing?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nA public genome sequencing effort of cotton was initiated in 2007 by a consortium of public researchers. They agreed on a strategy to sequence the genome of cultivated, tetraploid cotton. \"Tetraploid\" means that cultivated cotton actually has two separate genomes within its nucleus, referred to as the A and D genomes. The sequencing consortium first agreed to sequence the D-genome relative of cultivated cotton (G. raimondii, a wild Central American cotton species) because of its small size and limited number of repetitive elements. It is nearly one-third the number of bases of tetraploid cotton (AD), and each chromosome is only present once.[clarification needed] The A genome of G. arboreum would be sequenced next. Its genome is roughly twice the size of G. raimondii's. Part of the difference in size between the two genomes is the amplification of retrotransposons (GORGE). Once both diploid genomes are assembled, then research could begin sequencing the actual genomes of cultivated cotton varieties. This strategy is out of necessity; if one were to sequence the tetraploid genome without model diploid genomes, the euchromatic DNA sequences of the AD genomes would co-assemble and the repetitive elements of AD genomes would assembly independently into A and D sequences respectively. Then there would be no way to untangle the mess of AD sequences without comparing them to their diploid counterparts.\n\n--\nANSWER:\ndiploid counterparts\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for a comparison to understand tetraploid forms in cotton gene sequencing.', 'The context explains that the tetraploid genome of cultivated cotton has two separate genomes (A and D) within its nucleus.', 'It mentions that sequencing the tetraploid genome without model diploid genomes would result in co-assembled euchromatic DNA sequences and independently assembled repetitive elements, making it impossible to untangle the sequences.', 'The context states that comparing the tetraploid sequences to their diploid counterparts is necessary to avoid this problem.', \"The answer 'diploid counterparts' is faithful to the context because it directly addresses the need for a comparison to understand tetraploid forms, as explained in the context.\", 'The context provides a clear explanation of why diploid counterparts are necessary for understanding tetraploid forms, making the answer a logical conclusion based on the provided information.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": diploid counterparts}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho was the first governor of Charleston?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe community was established by several shiploads of settlers from Bermuda (which lies due east of South Carolina, although at 1,030 km or 640 mi, it is closest to Cape Hatteras, North Carolina), under the leadership of governor William Sayle, on the west bank of the Ashley River, a few miles northwest of the present-day city center. It was soon predicted by the Earl of Shaftesbury, one of the Lords Proprietors, to become a \"great port towne\", a destiny the city quickly fulfilled. In 1680, the settlement was moved east of the Ashley River to the peninsula between the Ashley and Cooper Rivers. Not only was this location more defensible, but it also offered access to a fine natural harbor.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nWilliam Sayle\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the first governor of Charleston, indicating that the answer should be a person who held a leadership position in the early days of the city.', \"The context mentions the establishment of the community by settlers from Bermuda under the leadership of 'governor William Sayle', which directly answers the question.\", \"The context also provides additional information about the settlement and its development, but the key phrase 'governor William Sayle' is the most relevant to the question.\", \"The answer 'William Sayle' is a direct match to the information provided in the context, making it a faithful response to the question.\", 'The context does not provide any alternative or conflicting information that would suggest a different answer, further supporting the accuracy of the response.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": William Sayle}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nA ball cannot be received in what type of position?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe primary law is that players other than goalkeepers may not deliberately handle the ball with their hands or arms during play, though they do use their hands during a throw-in restart. Although players usually use their feet to move the ball around, they may use any part of their body (notably, \"heading\" with the forehead) other than their hands or arms. Within normal play, all players are free to play the ball in any direction and move throughout the pitch, though the ball cannot be received in an offside position.\n\n--\nANSWER:\noffside\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about a position in which a ball cannot be received.', 'The context provides information about the rules of the game, specifically mentioning that players can use any part of their body except hands and arms to move the ball.', 'The context also mentions that within normal play, all players are free to play the ball in any direction and move throughout the pitch.', \"However, the context explicitly states that there is one exception: 'though the ball cannot be received in an offside position'.\", \"This statement directly answers the question, indicating that the position in which a ball cannot be received is indeed 'offside'.\", \"Therefore, the answer 'offside' is faithful to the context, as it accurately reflects the information provided in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": offside}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIf a West Fleming speaker were being extra careful to avoid the silent \"h,\" they might over-correct into what sound?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe different dialects show many sound shifts in different vowels (even shifting between diphthongs and monophthongs), and in some cases consonants also shift pronunciation. For example, an oddity of West Flemings (and to a lesser extent, East Flemings) is that, the voiced velar fricative (written as \"g\" in Dutch) shifts to a voiced glottal fricative (written as \"h\" in Dutch), while the letter \"h\" in West Flemish becomes mute (just like in French). As a result, when West Flemish try to talk Standard Dutch, they're often unable to pronounce the g-sound, and pronounce it similar to the h-sound. This leaves f.e. no difference between \"held\" (hero) and \"geld\" (money). Or in some cases, they are aware of the problem, and hyper-correct the \"h\" into a voiced velar fricative or g-sound, again leaving no difference.\n\n--\nANSWER:\ng-sound\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks about the sound a West Fleming speaker might over-correct into when trying to avoid the silent 'h'.\", \"The context explains that in West Flemish, the letter 'h' is mute, and the voiced velar fricative (written as 'g' in Dutch) shifts to a voiced glottal fricative (written as 'h' in Dutch).\", \"It also mentions that when West Flemish speakers try to talk Standard Dutch, they often hyper-correct the 'h' into a voiced velar fricative or g-sound.\", \"Therefore, the answer 'g-sound' is faithful to the context because it directly addresses the sound that West Fleming speakers might over-correct into when trying to avoid the silent 'h'.\", 'The context provides a clear explanation of the sound shift and the hyper-correction phenomenon, making the answer a logical conclusion based on the information provided.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": g-sound}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is a plastic version of a BC108?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nManufacturers of devices may have their own proprietary numbering system, for example CK722. Since devices are second-sourced, a manufacturer's prefix (like \"MPF\" in MPF102, which originally would denote a Motorola FET) now is an unreliable indicator of who made the device. Some proprietary naming schemes adopt parts of other naming schemes, for example a PN2222A is a (possibly Fairchild Semiconductor) 2N2222A in a plastic case (but a PN108 is a plastic version of a BC108, not a 2N108, while the PN100 is unrelated to other xx100 devices).\n\n--\nANSWER:\nPN108\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for a plastic version of a BC108.', 'The context provides information about proprietary numbering systems and how some devices are second-sourced, making manufacturer prefixes unreliable.', 'The context specifically mentions that a PN2222A is a plastic version of a 2N2222A, but also notes that a PN108 is a plastic version of a BC108, not a 2N108.', 'This direct mention of PN108 as the plastic version of BC108 in the context makes it clear that the answer is faithful to the context.', 'The context provides a specific example that directly answers the question, making the answer a straightforward extraction from the context.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": PN108}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhy did families send their girls to Diego's monastery? \n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nDominic became the spiritual father to several Albigensian women he had reconciled to the faith, and in 1206 he established them in a convent in Prouille. This convent would become the foundation of the Dominican nuns, thus making the Dominican nuns older than the Dominican friars. Prior Diego sanctioned the building of a monastery for girls whose parents had sent them to the care of the Albigensians because their families were too poor to fulfill their basic needs. The monastery was at Prouille would later become Dominic's headquarters for his missionary effort there. After two years on the mission field, Prior Diego died while traveling back to Spain. When his preaching companions heard of his death, all save Dominic and a very small number of others returned to their homes.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nFamilies sent their girls to Diego's monastery because they were too poor and also had large families to support.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER introduces an additional reason (\"had large families to support\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that families were \"too poor to fulfill their basic needs\" as the reason for sending their girls to the monastery.', 'The ANSWER incorrectly adds a new detail that is not supported by the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['had large families to support']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat political ideology did Gaddafi create?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nMuammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi (Arabic: معمر محمد أبو منيار القذافي‎ Arabic pronunciation: [muʕamar al.qaðaːfiː]; /ˈmoʊ.əmɑːr ɡəˈdɑːfi/; audio (help·info); c. 1942 – 20 October 2011), commonly known as Colonel Gaddafi,[b] was a Libyan revolutionary, politician, and political theorist. He governed Libya as Revolutionary Chairman of the Libyan Arab Republic from 1969 to 1977 and then as the \"Brotherly Leader\" of the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya from 1977 to 2011. Initially ideologically committed to Arab nationalism and Arab socialism, he came to rule according to his own Third International Theory before embracing Pan-Africanism and serving as Chairperson of the African Union from 2009 to 2010.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nThird International Theory\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks about the political ideology created by Gaddafi.', 'The CONTEXT mentions that Gaddafi was initially committed to Arab nationalism and Arab socialism, but then came to rule according to his own ideology.', \"The CONTEXT specifically mentions 'Third International Theory' as the ideology that Gaddafi came to rule according to.\", \"The ANSWER 'Third International Theory' is a direct match to the ideology mentioned in the CONTEXT as being created by Gaddafi.\", 'Therefore, the ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately identifies the political ideology created by Gaddafi as mentioned in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Third International Theory}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nOrozco and Villa fought for and won which city?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn response to Madero's letter to action, Pascual Orozco (a wealthy mining baron) and Chihuahua Governor Abraham González formed a powerful military union in the north, taking military control of several northern Mexican cities with other revolutionary leaders, including Pancho Villa. Against Madero's wishes, Orozco and Villa fought for and won Ciudad Juárez. After militias loyal to Madero defeated the Mexican federal army, on May 21, 1911, Madero signed the Treaty of Ciudad Juárez with Díaz. It required that Díaz abdicate his rule and be replaced by Madero. Insisting on a new election, Madero won overwhelmingly in late 1911, and he established a liberal democracy and received support from the United States and popular leaders such as Orozco and Villa. Orozco eventually became disappointed with the Madero's government and led a rebellion against him. He organized his own army, called \"Orozquistas\"—also called the Colorados (\"Red Flaggers\")—after Madero refused to agree to social reforms calling for better working hours, pay and conditions. The rural working class, which had supported Madero, now took up arms against him in support of Orozco.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nCiudad Juárez, which was largely destroyed in the battle.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds information not present in the CONTEXT, specifically the extent of damage to the city.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions that Orozco and Villa fought for and won Ciudad Juárez, but does not provide details about the city's condition after the battle.\", \"The ANSWER's additional information is not supported by the provided CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was largely destroyed in the battle']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen is King Mom symbolically burnt?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCarnival means weeks of events that bring colourfully decorated floats, contagiously throbbing music, luxuriously costumed groups of celebrants of all ages, King and Queen elections, electrifying jump-ups and torchlight parades, the Jouvert morning: the Children's Parades and finally the Grand Parade. Aruba's biggest celebration is a month-long affair consisting of festive \"jump-ups\" (street parades), spectacular parades and creative contests. Music and flamboyant costumes play a central role, from the Queen elections to the Grand Parade. Street parades continue in various districts throughout the month, with brass band, steel drum and roadmarch tunes. On the evening before Lent, Carnival ends with the symbolic burning of King Momo.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nOn the evening before Lent\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the specific time when King Momo is symbolically burnt.', 'The context provides information about the Carnival celebrations in Aruba, including various events and activities.', \"The context specifically mentions that 'On the evening before Lent, Carnival ends with the symbolic burning of King Momo.'\", 'This sentence directly answers the question by providing the exact time when King Momo is symbolically burnt.', \"The answer 'On the evening before Lent' is a direct quote from the context, ensuring that it is faithful to the provided information.\", \"The context and answer share the same phrase 'symbolic burning of King Momo', establishing a clear connection between the two.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": On the evening before Lent}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat should be anticipated because of the many factors that influence wood's density?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAge, diameter, height, radial growth, geographical location, site and growing conditions, silvicultural treatment, and seed source, all to some degree influence wood density. Variation is to be expected. Within an individual tree, the variation in wood density is often as great as or even greater than that between different trees (Timell 1986). Variation of specific gravity within the bole of a tree can occur in either the horizontal or vertical direction. :)\n\n--\nANSWER:\nVariation, and in some cases, a slight increase in density due to the tree's exposure to nearby water sources.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER introduces a new concept of \"a slight increase in density due to the tree\\'s exposure to nearby water sources\" which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions various factors that influence wood density and the resulting variation, but does not provide any information about the effect of nearby water sources on wood density.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it adds new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": [\"a slight increase in density due to the tree's exposure to nearby water sources\"]}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow is royal assent currently granted in the Isle of Man?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nSpecial procedures apply to legislation passed by Tynwald, the legislature of the Isle of Man. Before the lordship of the Island was purchased by the British Crown in 1765 (the Revestment), the assent of the Lord of Mann to a bill was signified by letter to the governor. After 1765, royal assent was at first signified by letter from the Secretary of State to the governor; but, during the British Regency, the practice began of granting royal assent by Order in Council, which continues to this day, though limited to exceptional cases since 1981.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nRoyal assent is currently granted in the Isle of Man by Order in Council, typically signed in the presence of the Lieutenant Governor.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the typical signing procedure of the Order in Council, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that royal assent is granted by Order in Council in exceptional cases since 1981, but does not provide information about the typical signing procedure.', 'The ANSWER implies that the Lieutenant Governor is always present during the signing of the Order in Council, which is not supported by the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['typically signed in the presence of the Lieutenant Governor']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nFor what department does the north campus location of Washington University provide off-site storage? \n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nWashington University's North Campus and West Campus principally house administrative functions that are not student focused. North Campus lies in St. Louis City near the Delmar Loop. The University acquired the building and adjacent property in 2004, formerly home to the Angelica Uniform Factory. Several University administrative departments are located at the North Campus location, including offices for Quadrangle Housing, Accounting and Treasury Services, Parking and Transportation Services, Army ROTC, and Network Technology Services. The North Campus location also provides off-site storage space for the Performing Arts Department. Renovations are still ongoing; recent additions to the North Campus space include a small eatery operated by Bon Appétit Management Company, the University's on-campus food provider, completed during spring semester 2007, as well as the Family Learning Center, operated by Bright Horizons and opened in September 2010.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nPerforming Arts Department\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the department that the North Campus location of Washington University provides off-site storage for.', 'The context mentions that the North Campus location provides off-site storage space for a specific department.', 'The context explicitly states that the Performing Arts Department is the department for which the North Campus location provides off-site storage space.', \"The answer 'Performing Arts Department' is a direct match to the information provided in the context.\", 'Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the information provided in the context regarding the department that the North Campus location provides off-site storage for.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Performing Arts Department}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho owned the Columbus Destroyers in 2008?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAlthough the Arenafootball2 league played its tenth season in 2009, a conference call in December 2008 resulted in enough votes from owners and cooperation from the AFLPA for the AFL to suspend the entire 2009 season in order to create \"a long-term plan to improve its economic model\". In doing so, the AFL became the second sports league to cancel an entire season, after the National Hockey League cancelled the 2004-05 season because of a lockout. The AFL also became the third sports league to lose its postseason (the first being Major League Baseball, which lost its postseason in 1994 because of a strike). Efforts to reformat the league's business model were placed under the leadership of Columbus Destroyers owner Jim Renacci and interim commissioner Policy.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nJim Renacci\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the owner of the Columbus Destroyers in 2008.', 'The context mentions the Columbus Destroyers and its owner, Jim Renacci, in the same sentence.', \"The context states that Jim Renacci was the owner of the Columbus Destroyers, as he is mentioned as the leader of efforts to reformat the league's business model 'under the leadership of Columbus Destroyers owner Jim Renacci'.\", 'The context does not provide any information that would suggest the ownership of the Columbus Destroyers changed in 2008, so it can be inferred that Jim Renacci was the owner in 2008.', \"Therefore, the answer 'Jim Renacci' is faithful to the context given the question, as it accurately identifies the owner of the Columbus Destroyers in 2008.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Jim Renacci}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen was the Slave Trade Act enacted?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nWith support from the British abolitionist movement, Parliament enacted the Slave Trade Act in 1807, which abolished the slave trade in the empire. In 1808, Sierra Leone was designated an official British colony for freed slaves. The Slavery Abolition Act passed in 1833 abolished slavery in the British Empire on 1 August 1834 (with the exception of St. Helena, Ceylon and the territories administered by the East India Company, though these exclusions were later repealed). Under the Act, slaves were granted full emancipation after a period of 4 to 6 years of \"apprenticeship\".\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1807\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for the year the Slave Trade Act was enacted.', 'The CONTEXT provides information about the Slave Trade Act, including the year it was enacted.', \"The CONTEXT states that 'Parliament enacted the Slave Trade Act in 1807', which directly answers the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER '1807' is a direct match to the year mentioned in the CONTEXT, demonstrating that the ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT.\", 'The ANSWER only provides the year, which is the specific information requested by the QUESTION, showing that it is a relevant and accurate response.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 1807}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat documentary features a white man in North Carolina?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nSome biographical accounts include the autobiography Life on the Color Line: The True Story of a White Boy Who Discovered He Was Black by Gregory Howard Williams; One Drop: My Father's Hidden Life—A Story of Race and Family Secrets written by Bliss Broyard about her father Anatole Broyard; the documentary Colored White Boy about a white man in North Carolina who discovers that he is the descendant of a white plantation owner and a raped African slave; and the documentary on The Sanders Women of Shreveport, Louisiana.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nColored White Boy, which was released in 2005.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides additional information about the documentary 'Colored White Boy', specifically its release year.\", 'However, this information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions the title of the documentary and a brief description of its content.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it includes extraneous information not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was released in 2005']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho replaced Lord Rosenbery after only a year of government? \n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nGladstone returned to power after the 1892 general election; he was 82 years old. Victoria objected when Gladstone proposed appointing the Radical MP Henry Labouchere to the Cabinet, so Gladstone agreed not to appoint him. In 1894, Gladstone retired and, without consulting the outgoing prime minister, Victoria appointed Lord Rosebery as prime minister. His government was weak, and the following year Lord Salisbury replaced him. Salisbury remained prime minister for the remainder of Victoria's reign.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nLord Salisbury\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The CONTEXT mentions that Lord Rosebery's government was weak, which sets the stage for his replacement.\", \"The CONTEXT states that 'the following year Lord Salisbury replaced him', directly answering the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER, 'Lord Salisbury', is a direct match to the person mentioned in the CONTEXT as replacing Lord Rosebery.\", 'The CONTEXT provides a clear timeline of events, with Lord Rosebery being replaced by Lord Salisbury after only a year of government, which aligns with the QUESTION.', \"The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately reflects the information provided about Lord Rosebery's replacement.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Lord Salisbury}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho in the MoD was convicted of fraud?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe most notable fraud conviction was that of Gordon Foxley, head of defence procurement at the Ministry of Defence from 1981 to 1984. Police claimed he received at least £3.5m in total in corrupt payments, such as substantial bribes from overseas arms contractors aiming to influence the allocation of contracts.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nGordon Foxley, who also briefly worked as a consultant after leaving the Ministry of Defence.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides additional information about Gordon Foxley's work as a consultant after leaving the Ministry of Defence, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.\", \"The CONTEXT only mentions Gordon Foxley's role as head of defence procurement at the Ministry of Defence from 1981 to 1984, but does not provide any information about his work as a consultant.\", 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it includes information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who also briefly worked as a consultant after leaving the Ministry of Defence']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many rides and inns does the fair have?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nBut Hanover is not only one of the most important Exhibition Cities in the world, it is also one of the German capitals for marksmen. The Schützenfest Hannover is the largest Marksmen's Fun Fair in the world and takes place once a year (late June to early July) (2014 - July 4th to the 13th). It consists of more than 260 rides and inns, five large beer tents and a big entertainment programme. The highlight of this fun fair is the 12 kilometres (7 mi) long Parade of the Marksmen with more than 12.000 participants from all over the world, among them around 5.000 marksmen, 128 bands and more than 70 wagons, carriages and big festival vehicles. It is the longest procession in Europe. Around 2 million people visit this fun fair every year. The landmark of this Fun Fair is the biggest transportable Ferris Wheel in the world (60 m or 197 ft high). The origins of this fun fair is located in the year 1529.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nmore than 260\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the number of rides and inns at the fair.', \"The context provides information about the Schützenfest Hannover, a Marksmen's Fun Fair in Hanover.\", \"Within the context, it is mentioned that the fair 'consists of more than 260 rides and inns'.\", 'This specific detail directly answers the question, providing the exact number of rides and inns.', \"The answer 'more than 260' is a direct quote from the context, ensuring its accuracy and faithfulness to the provided information.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": more than 260}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is Germany's constitution called?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nFinal interpretation of and amendments to the German Constitution, the Grundgesetz, is the task of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court), which is the de facto highest German court, as it can declare both federal and state legislation ineffective, and has the power to overrule decisions of all other federal courts, despite not being a regular court of appeals on itself in the German court system. It is also the only court possessing the power and authority to outlaw political parties, if it is deemed that these parties have repeatedly violated articles of the Constitution.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthe Grundgesetz\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The QUESTION asks for the name of Germany's constitution.\", \"The CONTEXT mentions the 'German Constitution' and then immediately provides its name as the 'Grundgesetz'.\", \"This establishes a direct relationship between the term 'German Constitution' and 'Grundgesetz' within the CONTEXT.\", \"The ANSWER, 'the Grundgesetz', is a direct reference to the name of the German Constitution as mentioned in the CONTEXT.\", \"Therefore, the ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT, as it accurately identifies the name of Germany's constitution as provided in the CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": the Grundgesetz}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat did Miguel López de Legazpi call the island discovered on January 9, 1530?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Spanish ship San Pedro and two other vessels in an expedition commanded by Miguel López de Legazpi discovered an island on January 9, 1530, possibly Mejit, at 10°N, which they named \"Los Barbudos\". The Spaniards went ashore and traded with the local inhabitants. On January 10, the Spaniards sighted another island that they named \"Placeres\", perhaps Ailuk; ten leagues away, they sighted another island that they called \"Pajares\" (perhaps Jemo). On January 12, they sighted another island at 10°N that they called \"Corrales\" (possibly Wotho). On January 15, the Spaniards sighted another low island, perhaps Ujelang, at 10°N, where they described the people on \"Barbudos\". After that, ships including the San Jeronimo, Los Reyes and Todos los Santos also visited the islands in different years.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nLos Barbudos, which roughly translates to \"The Bearded Ones\" in English, and was named after the island's unique bearded palm trees.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the name \"Los Barbudos\" being translated to \"The Bearded Ones\" in English, which is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The ANSWER also mentions that the name \"Los Barbudos\" was given due to the island\\'s unique bearded palm trees, which is not supported by the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that the island was named \"Los Barbudos\" by Miguel López de Legazpi, without providing any further explanation or details.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": [\"which roughly translates to 'The Bearded Ones' in English\", \"and was named after the island's unique bearded palm trees\"]}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many MP were elected in the 1910 election?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe 1910 election saw 42 Labour MPs elected to the House of Commons, a significant victory since, a year before the election, the House of Lords had passed the Osborne judgment ruling that Trades Unions in the United Kingdom could no longer donate money to fund the election campaigns and wages of Labour MPs. The governing Liberals were unwilling to repeal this judicial decision with primary legislation. The height of Liberal compromise was to introduce a wage for Members of Parliament to remove the need to involve the Trade Unions. By 1913, faced with the opposition of the largest Trades Unions, the Liberal government passed the Trade Disputes Act to allow Trade Unions to fund Labour MPs once more.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n42\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the number of MPs elected in the 1910 election.', 'The context provides information about the 1910 election, specifically mentioning the number of Labour MPs elected.', \"The context states that '42 Labour MPs' were elected to the House of Commons in the 1910 election.\", 'Although the context does not explicitly state the total number of MPs elected, it does provide a specific number for Labour MPs, which is the answer provided.', 'Given the information provided in the context, it can be inferred that the answer is faithful to the context, as it directly quotes the number of Labour MPs elected in the 1910 election.', \"However, it's worth noting that the answer might be incomplete, as it only provides the number of Labour MPs, not the total number of MPs elected in the 1910 election.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 42}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what country was the model constitution of 1791 in effect for only one year?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn several nations, rulers welcomed leaders of the Enlightenment at court and asked them to help design laws and programs to reform the system, typically to build stronger national states. These rulers are called \"enlightened despots\" by historians. They included Frederick the Great of Prussia, Catherine the Great of Russia, Leopold II of Tuscany, and Joseph II of Austria. Joseph was over-enthusiastic, announcing so many reforms that had so little support that revolts broke out and his regime became a comedy of errors and nearly all his programs were reversed. Senior ministers Pombal in Portugal and Struensee in Denmark also governed according to Enlightenment ideals. In Poland, the model constitution of 1791 expressed Enlightenment ideals, but was in effect for only one year as the nation was partitioned among its neighbors. More enduring were the cultural achievements, which created a nationalist spirit in Poland.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nPoland\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the country where the model constitution of 1791 was in effect for only one year.', \"The context mentions the model constitution of 1791 in relation to Poland, stating that it 'expressed Enlightenment ideals, but was in effect for only one year as the nation was partitioned among its neighbors'.\", 'This information directly answers the question, indicating that Poland is the country where the model constitution of 1791 was in effect for only one year.', 'The context provides a clear and specific connection between the model constitution of 1791 and Poland, making it a faithful and accurate source for the answer.', \"The answer 'Poland' is a direct inference from the context, demonstrating a clear understanding of the information provided.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Poland}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat types of feathers did debutantes wear in their hair?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCourt presentations of aristocratic young ladies to the monarch took place at the palace from the reign of Edward VII. These young women were known as débutantes, and the occasion—termed their \"coming out\"—represented their first entrée into society. Débutantes wore full court dress, with three tall ostrich feathers in their hair. They entered, curtsied, and performed a choreographed backwards walk and a further curtsy, while manoeuvring a dress train of prescribed length. (The ceremony, known as an evening court, corresponded to the \"court drawing rooms\" of Victoria's reign.) After World War II, the ceremony was replaced by less formal afternoon receptions, usually without choreographed curtsies and court dress.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nostrich feathers, often dyed in a subtle shade of blue\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often dyed in a subtle shade of blue']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho is in control of the organization?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe board of directors has ultimate control over the organization, but typically an executive director is hired. In some cases, the board is elected by a membership, but commonly, the board of directors is self-perpetuating. In these \"board-only\" organizations, board members nominate new members and vote on their fellow directors nominations. Part VI, section A, question 7a of the Form 990 asks \"members, stockholders, or other persons who had the power to elect or appoint one or more members of the governing body?\".\n\n--\nANSWER:\nboard of directors\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks who is in control of the organization, which directly relates to the governing body of the organization.', \"The context explicitly states that the board of directors has 'ultimate control' over the organization, indicating that they are the governing body in charge.\", 'The context further explains the composition and selection process of the board of directors, reinforcing their role as the controlling entity.', \"The answer 'board of directors' is a direct match to the entity mentioned in the context as having control, demonstrating a clear connection between the question, context, and answer.\", \"The context's mention of the Form 990 and the question about electing or appointing members of the governing body also supports the idea that the board of directors is the controlling entity, as they are the ones being referred to in this context.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": board of directors}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho is elected every even numbered year?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAnn Arbor has a council-manager form of government. The City Council has 11 voting members: the mayor and 10 city council members. The mayor and city council members serve two-year terms: the mayor is elected every even-numbered year, while half of the city council members are up for election annually (five in even-numbered and five in odd-numbered years). Two council members are elected from each of the city's five wards. The mayor is elected citywide. The mayor is the presiding officer of the City Council and has the power to appoint all Council committee members as well as board and commission members, with the approval of the City Council. The current mayor of Ann Arbor is Christopher Taylor, a Democrat who was elected as mayor in 2014. Day-to-day city operations are managed by a city administrator chosen by the city council.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nThe mayor, who is also the head of the local police department.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER incorrectly states that the mayor is the head of the local police department.', 'The CONTEXT does not mention the mayor being the head of the local police department.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions the mayor's role as the presiding officer of the City Council and their power to appoint committee members, board members, and commission members.\", 'The ANSWER introduces information not present in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who is also the head of the local police department']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nNew York is home to what largest transportation system in the world?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe New York City Fire Department faces highly multifaceted firefighting challenges in many ways unique to New York. In addition to responding to building types that range from wood-frame single family homes to high-rise structures, there are many secluded bridges and tunnels, as well as large parks and wooded areas that can give rise to brush fires. New York is also home to one of the largest subway systems in the world, consisting of hundreds of miles of tunnel with electrified track.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nsubway systems\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the largest transportation system in the world located in New York.', \"The context mentions that New York is home to 'one of the largest subway systems in the world'.\", 'Although the context does not explicitly state that it is the largest, it provides a strong hint that the subway system is a significant transportation system in New York.', \"The answer 'subway systems' is faithful to the context because it directly relates to the information provided about New York's transportation system.\", \"The context's description of the subway system as 'one of the largest' implies that it is a notable transportation system, making 'subway systems' a reasonable answer to the question.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": subway systems}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nSome child work as guides for whom?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nChild labour is still common in many parts of the world. Estimates for child labour vary. It ranges between 250 and 304 million, if children aged 5–17 involved in any economic activity are counted. If light occasional work is excluded, ILO estimates there were 153 million child labourers aged 5–14 worldwide in 2008. This is about 20 million less than ILO estimate for child labourers in 2004. Some 60 percent of the child labour was involved in agricultural activities such as farming, dairy, fisheries and forestry. Another 25 percent of child labourers were in service activities such as retail, hawking goods, restaurants, load and transfer of goods, storage, picking and recycling trash, polishing shoes, domestic help, and other services. The remaining 15 percent laboured in assembly and manufacturing in informal economy, home-based enterprises, factories, mines, packaging salt, operating machinery, and such operations. Two out of three child workers work alongside their parents, in unpaid family work situations. Some children work as guides for tourists, sometimes combined with bringing in business for shops and restaurants. Child labour predominantly occurs in the rural areas (70%) and informal urban sector (26%).\n\n--\nANSWER:\ntourists, often in exchange for a small stipend and a free meal.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information not present in the CONTEXT, specifically the mention of a \"small stipend and a free meal\" as compensation for the child guides.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that some children work as guides for tourists, but does not provide any details about the compensation or benefits they receive.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often in exchange for a small stipend and a free meal']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nInsects hatch from what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe life cycles of insects vary but most hatch from eggs. Insect growth is constrained by the inelastic exoskeleton and development involves a series of molts. The immature stages can differ from the adults in structure, habit and habitat, and can include a passive pupal stage in those groups that undergo 4-stage metamorphosis (see holometabolism). Insects that undergo 3-stage metamorphosis lack a pupal stage and adults develop through a series of nymphal stages. The higher level relationship of the Hexapoda is unclear. Fossilized insects of enormous size have been found from the Paleozoic Era, including giant dragonflies with wingspans of 55 to 70 cm (22–28 in). The most diverse insect groups appear to have coevolved with flowering plants.\n\n--\nANSWER:\neggs\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks about the origin of insects, specifically what they hatch from.', \"The CONTEXT provides information about the life cycles of insects, mentioning that 'most hatch from eggs'.\", 'This statement directly answers the QUESTION, establishing a clear connection between the CONTEXT and the ANSWER.', \"The ANSWER 'eggs' is a faithful representation of the information provided in the CONTEXT, as it accurately reflects the origin of most insects.\", 'The CONTEXT also provides additional information about insect growth and development, but the ANSWER remains focused on the specific detail relevant to the QUESTION.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": eggs}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat forbid hunting in the woods with hounds and keeping hawks or falcons?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nFrom early Christian times, hunting has been forbidden to Roman Catholic Church clerics. Thus the Corpus Juris Canonici (C. ii, X, De cleric. venat.) says, \"We forbid to all servants of God hunting and expeditions through the woods with hounds; and we also forbid them to keep hawks or falcons.\" The Fourth Council of the Lateran, held under Pope Innocent III, decreed (canon xv): \"We interdict hunting or hawking to all clerics.\" The decree of the Council of Trent is worded more mildly: \"Let clerics abstain from illicit hunting and hawking\" (Sess. XXIV, De reform., c. xii), which seems to imply that not all hunting is illicit, and canonists generally make a distinction declaring noisy (clamorosa) hunting unlawful, but not quiet (quieta) hunting.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nCorpus Juris Canonici\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the entity that forbids hunting in the woods with hounds and keeping hawks or falcons.', \"The context mentions the Corpus Juris Canonici as the source that explicitly states 'We forbid to all servants of God hunting and expeditions through the woods with hounds; and we also forbid them to keep hawks or falcons.'\", 'This statement directly matches the action described in the question, indicating that the Corpus Juris Canonici is the entity responsible for the prohibition.', 'The context also mentions other entities, such as the Fourth Council of the Lateran and the Council of Trent, but they are not as directly linked to the specific prohibition mentioned in the question.', \"Therefore, the answer 'Corpus Juris Canonici' is faithful to the context because it is the entity that explicitly forbids the actions described in the question.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Corpus Juris Canonici}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho was the first to develop literature?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nEgyptian literature traces its beginnings to ancient Egypt and is some of the earliest known literature. Indeed, the Egyptians were the first culture to develop literature as we know it today, that is, the book. It is an important cultural element in the life of Egypt. Egyptian novelists and poets were among the first to experiment with modern styles of Arabic literature, and the forms they developed have been widely imitated throughout the Middle East. The first modern Egyptian novel Zaynab by Muhammad Husayn Haykal was published in 1913 in the Egyptian vernacular. Egyptian novelist Naguib Mahfouz was the first Arabic-language writer to win the Nobel Prize in Literature. Egyptian women writers include Nawal El Saadawi, well known for her feminist activism, and Alifa Rifaat who also writes about women and tradition.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nEgyptians, who were also known for their early experiments with the printing press.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER claims that Egyptians were known for their early experiments with the printing press.', 'However, the CONTEXT does not mention anything about the Egyptians experimenting with the printing press.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that the Egyptians were the first culture to develop literature as we know it today, specifically the book.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces information that is not supported by the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who were also known for their early experiments with the printing press']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat type of lifestyle did the Jurchen live?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Qing dynasty was founded not by Han Chinese, who constitute the majority of the Chinese population, but by a sedentary farming people known as the Jurchen, a Tungusic people who lived around the region now comprising the Chinese provinces of Jilin and Heilongjiang. The Manchus are sometimes mistaken for a nomadic people, which they were not. What was to become the Manchu state was founded by Nurhaci, the chieftain of a minor Jurchen tribe – the Aisin Gioro – in Jianzhou in the early 17th century. Originally a vassal of the Ming emperors, Nurhachi embarked on an intertribal feud in 1582 that escalated into a campaign to unify the nearby tribes. By 1616, he had sufficiently consolidated Jianzhou so as to be able to proclaim himself Khan of the Great Jin in reference to the previous Jurchen dynasty.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nsedentary farming\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the type of lifestyle the Jurchen lived.', 'The context provides information about the Jurchen people, including their lifestyle.', \"The context states that the Jurchen were a 'sedentary farming people', which directly answers the question.\", \"The answer 'sedentary farming' is faithful to the context because it is a direct quote from the context, ensuring accuracy and consistency.\", 'The context also contrasts the Jurchen with nomadic people, implying that the Jurchen had a distinct lifestyle that was not nomadic, further supporting the answer.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": sedentary farming}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the area closest to the continental US called?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAlso referred to as the Panhandle or Inside Passage, this is the region of Alaska closest to the rest of the United States. As such, this was where most of the initial non-indigenous settlement occurred in the years following the Alaska Purchase. The region is dominated by the Alexander Archipelago as well as the Tongass National Forest, the largest national forest in the United States. It contains the state capital Juneau, the former capital Sitka, and Ketchikan, at one time Alaska's largest city. The Alaska Marine Highway provides a vital surface transportation link throughout the area, as only three communities (Haines, Hyder and Skagway) enjoy direct connections to the contiguous North American road system.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nPanhandle or Inside Passage, also known for its unique coffee plantations.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides additional information about the region being 'also known for its unique coffee plantations'.\", 'However, the CONTEXT does not mention anything about coffee plantations in the region.', 'This extra information is not supported by the provided CONTEXT, making the ANSWER unfaithful to the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['also known for its unique coffee plantations']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat caused a large migration of Greek refuges in the 1450s?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe humanists' close study of Latin literary texts soon enabled them to discern historical differences in the writing styles of different periods. By analogy with what they saw as decline of Latin, they applied the principle of ad fontes, or back to the sources, across broad areas of learning, seeking out manuscripts of Patristic literature as well as pagan authors. In 1439, while employed in Naples at the court of Alfonso V of Aragon (at the time engaged in a dispute with the Papal States) the humanist Lorenzo Valla used stylistic textual analysis, now called philology, to prove that the Donation of Constantine, which purported to confer temporal powers on the Pope of Rome, was an 8th-century forgery. For the next 70 years, however, neither Valla nor any of his contemporaries thought to apply the techniques of philology to other controversial manuscripts in this way. Instead, after the fall of the Byzantine Empire to the Turks in 1453, which brought a flood of Greek Orthodox refugees to Italy, humanist scholars increasingly turned to the study of Neoplatonism and Hermeticism, hoping to bridge the differences between the Greek and Roman Churches, and even between Christianity itself and the non-Christian world. The refugees brought with them Greek manuscripts, not only of Plato and Aristotle, but also of the Christian Gospels, previously unavailable in the Latin West.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nGreek manuscripts\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks about the cause of a large migration of Greek refugees in the 1450s.', 'The CONTEXT mentions the fall of the Byzantine Empire to the Turks in 1453 as the event that brought a flood of Greek Orthodox refugees to Italy.', \"However, the ANSWER provided is 'Greek manuscripts', which is not directly related to the cause of the migration.\", 'Upon closer examination, it appears that the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT given the QUESTION.', 'The correct answer should be related to the fall of the Byzantine Empire, not the manuscripts brought by the refugees.', 'The ANSWER seems to be a consequence of the migration, rather than the cause.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Greek manuscripts}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nOn what date did ESPN buy a minority share of the AFL?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nOn December 19, 2006, ESPN announced the purchase of a minority stake in the AFL. This deal included television rights for the ESPN family of networks. ESPN would televise a minimum of 17 regular season games, most on Monday nights, and nine playoff games, including ArenaBowl XXI on ABC. The deal resulted in added exposure on ESPN's SportsCenter. However, after the original AFL filed for bankruptcy, this arrangement did not carry over to the new AFL, which is a separate legal entity.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nDecember 19, 2006, at 10:00 AM\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides a specific time (\"10:00 AM\") that is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the date of the announcement, but does not provide any information about the time of day.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it includes additional information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['at 10:00 AM']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the purpose of a pub name?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nPub names are used to identify and differentiate each pub. Modern names are sometimes a marketing ploy or attempt to create \"brand awareness\", frequently using a comic theme thought to be memorable, Slug and Lettuce for a pub chain being an example. Interesting origins are not confined to old or traditional names, however. Names and their origins can be broken up into a relatively small number of categories.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nto identify and differentiate each pub, often reflecting the local culture or history of the surrounding area, and sometimes even the owner's favorite hobby.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often reflecting the local culture or history of the surrounding area', \"and sometimes even the owner's favorite hobby\"]}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat was built along the Rhine \n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAlthough there is some evidence of earlier inhabitation in the region of Utrecht, dating back to the Stone Age (app. 2200 BCE) and settling in the Bronze Age (app. 1800–800 BCE), the founding date of the city is usually related to the construction of a Roman fortification (castellum), probably built in around 50 CE. A series of such fortresses was built after the Roman emperor Claudius decided the empire should not expand north. To consolidate the border the limes Germanicus defense line was constructed along the main branch of the river Rhine, which at that time flowed through a more northern bed compared to today (what is now the Kromme Rijn). These fortresses were designed to house a cohort of about 500 Roman soldiers. Near the fort settlements would grow housing artisans, traders and soldiers' wives and children.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nTo consolidate the border the limes Germanicus defense line was constructed along the main branch of the river Rhine, which featured a series of small, decorative bridges.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which featured a series of small, decorative bridges']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho was in pursuit of Roger Maris' home run record?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn June, 1998 Sammy Sosa exploded into the pursuit of Roger Maris' home run record. Sosa had 13 home runs entering the month, representing less than half of Mark McGwire's total. Sosa had his first of four multi-home run games that month on June 1, and went on to break Rudy York's record with 20 home runs in the month, a record that still stands. By the end of his historic month, the outfielder's 33 home runs tied him with Ken Griffey, Jr. and left him only four behind McGwire's 37. Sosa finished with 66 and won the NL MVP Award.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nSammy Sosa\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks who was in pursuit of Roger Maris' home run record.\", \"The context mentions that in June 1998, Sammy Sosa 'exploded into the pursuit of Roger Maris' home run record', directly answering the question.\", \"The context further explains Sosa's progress in pursuing the record, including his home run count and comparison to other players, providing additional evidence that Sosa was indeed the one pursuing the record.\", \"The answer 'Sammy Sosa' is faithful to the context because it accurately identifies the person mentioned in the context as the one pursuing Roger Maris' home run record.\", 'The context provides sufficient information to support the answer, making it a reasonable and logical conclusion based on the given information.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Sammy Sosa}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhi did Victoria have to live with because she was unmarried?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThough queen, as an unmarried young woman Victoria was required by social convention to live with her mother, despite their differences over the Kensington System and her mother's continued reliance on Conroy. Her mother was consigned to a remote apartment in Buckingham Palace, and Victoria often refused to see her. When Victoria complained to Melbourne that her mother's close proximity promised \"torment for many years\", Melbourne sympathised but said it could be avoided by marriage, which Victoria called a \"schocking [sic] alternative\". She showed interest in Albert's education for the future role he would have to play as her husband, but she resisted attempts to rush her into wedlock.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nher mother, who was also her piano teacher.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER includes additional information that Victoria's mother was her piano teacher.\", \"However, the CONTEXT does not mention Victoria's mother being her piano teacher.\", 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information not present in the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who was also her piano teacher']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nThe panels of naos are only capped in importance by which other location?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe greatest mosaic work of the Palaeologan renaissance in art is the decoration of the Chora Church in Constantinople. Although the mosaics of the naos have not survived except three panels, the decoration of the exonarthex and the esonarthex constitute the most important full-scale mosaic cycle in Constantinople after the Hagia Sophia. They were executed around 1320 by the command of Theodore Metochites. The esonarthex has two fluted domes, specially created to provide the ideal setting for the mosaic images of the ancestors of Christ. The southern one is called the Dome of the Pantokrator while the northern one is the Dome of the Theotokos. The most important panel of the esonarthex depicts Theodore Metochites wearing a huge turban, offering the model of the church to Christ. The walls of both narthexes are decorated with mosaic cycles from the life of the Virgin and the life of Christ. These panels show the influence of the Italian trecento on Byzantine art especially the more natural settings, landscapes, figures.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nThe panels of naos are only capped in importance by the Hagia Sophia, which is also home to a lesser-known, exquisite, 14th-century rose garden.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER mentions a 14th-century rose garden in the Hagia Sophia, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the Hagia Sophia as a location with a full-scale mosaic cycle, but does not provide any information about a rose garden.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which is also home to a lesser-known, exquisite, 14th-century rose garden']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat was the purpose of top secret ICBM committee?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nShortly before his death, when he was already quite ill, von Neumann headed the United States government's top secret ICBM committee, and it would sometimes meet in his home. Its purpose was to decide on the feasibility of building an ICBM large enough to carry a thermonuclear weapon. Von Neumann had long argued that while the technical obstacles were sizable, they could be overcome in time. The SM-65 Atlas passed its first fully functional test in 1959, two years after his death. The feasibility of an ICBM owed as much to improved, smaller warheads as it did to developments in rocketry, and his understanding of the former made his advice invaluable.\n\n--\nANSWER:\ndecide on the feasibility of building an ICBM large enough to carry a thermonuclear or hydrogen bomb\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER introduces the term \"hydrogen bomb\" which is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT specifically mentions \"thermonuclear weapon\" but does not provide any information about \"hydrogen bomb\".', 'The addition of \"hydrogen bomb\" in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT and may be considered an inference or an assumption.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['hydrogen bomb']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat did Homo Sapiens acquire that allowed them to become aware of Culture?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCambridge English Dictionary states that culture is, \"the way of life, especially the general customs and beliefs, of a particular group of people at a particular time.\" Terror Management Theory posits that culture is a series of activities and worldviews that provide humans with the illusion of being individuals of value in a world meaning—raising themselves above the merely physical aspects of existence, in order to deny the animal insignificance and death that Homo Sapiens became aware of when they acquired a larger brain.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nlarger brain and opposable thumbs\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes \"opposable thumbs\" as a factor that allowed Homo Sapiens to become aware of Culture.', 'However, the CONTEXT only mentions the acquisition of a \"larger brain\" as the factor that led to this awareness.', 'There is no mention of \"opposable thumbs\" in the CONTEXT as a contributing factor to the awareness of Culture.', 'Therefore, the inclusion of \"opposable thumbs\" in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['opposable thumbs']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat do oversea operations require?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nDespite its domestic focus, the FBI also maintains a significant international footprint, operating 60 Legal Attache (LEGAT) offices and 15 sub-offices in U.S. embassies and consulates across the globe. These overseas offices exist primarily for the purpose of coordination with foreign security services and do not usually conduct unilateral operations in the host countries. The FBI can and does at times carry out secret activities overseas, just as the CIA has a limited domestic function; these activities generally require coordination across government agencies.\n\n--\nANSWER:\ncoordination\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The QUESTION asks about the requirements of overseas operations, which is a specific aspect of the FBI's international activities.\", \"The CONTEXT mentions that the FBI's overseas offices exist primarily for the purpose of coordination with foreign security services, indicating that coordination is a key aspect of their international operations.\", \"The CONTEXT also states that the FBI's secret activities overseas generally require coordination across government agencies, further emphasizing the importance of coordination in overseas operations.\", \"The ANSWER, 'coordination', is a direct match to the information provided in the CONTEXT, demonstrating that it is a faithful response to the QUESTION given the CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": coordination}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich development in 1915 played a key role in developing Alaska?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nBuilt around 1915, the Alaska Railroad (ARR) played a key role in the development of Alaska through the 20th century. It links north Pacific shipping through providing critical infrastructure with tracks that run from Seward to Interior Alaska by way of South Central Alaska, passing through Anchorage, Eklutna, Wasilla, Talkeetna, Denali, and Fairbanks, with spurs to Whittier, Palmer and North Pole. The cities, towns, villages, and region served by ARR tracks are known statewide as \"The Railbelt\". In recent years, the ever-improving paved highway system began to eclipse the railroad's importance in Alaska's economy.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nAlaska Railroad (ARR)\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks about a development in 1915 that played a key role in Alaska's development.\", 'The context mentions that the Alaska Railroad (ARR) was built around 1915, which matches the time frame mentioned in the question.', \"The context also states that the ARR played a key role in the development of Alaska through the 20th century, which aligns with the question's requirement for a development that had a significant impact on Alaska.\", \"The context provides additional details about the ARR's infrastructure and its importance in Alaska's economy, which further supports the idea that the ARR is a significant development in Alaska's history.\", \"Therefore, the answer 'Alaska Railroad (ARR)' is faithful to the context because it directly addresses the question and is supported by the information provided in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Alaska Railroad (ARR)}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen were the surface-to-air missile systems introduced?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nUnlike the heavier guns, these smaller weapons are in widespread use due to their low cost and ability to quickly follow the target. Classic examples of autocannons and large caliber guns are the 40 mm autocannon and the 8.8 cm FlaK 18, 36 gun, both designed by Bofors of Sweden. Artillery weapons of this sort have for the most part been superseded by the effective surface-to-air missile systems that were introduced in the 1950s, although they were still retained by many nations. The development of surface-to-air missiles began in Nazi Germany during the late World War II with missiles such as the Wasserfall, though no working system was deployed before the war's end, and represented new attempts to increase effectiveness of the anti-aircraft systems faced with growing threat from [bomber]s. Land-based SAMs can be deployed from fixed installations or mobile launchers, either wheeled or tracked. The tracked vehicles are usually armoured vehicles specifically designed to carry SAMs.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1950s, with the first operational systems being deployed in the United States.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the first operational systems being deployed in the United States, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that the development of surface-to-air missiles began in Nazi Germany during the late World War II, but does not specify the country where the first operational systems were deployed.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['with the first operational systems being deployed in the United States']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what densely populated area is it spoken?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCentral Catalan is considered the standard pronunciation of the language and has the highest number of speakers. It is spoken in the densely populated regions of the Barcelona province, the eastern half of the province of Tarragona, and most of the province of Girona.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nBarcelona province, particularly in its coastal areas near the port.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds extra information (\"particularly in its coastal areas near the port\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the Barcelona province as one of the densely populated regions where Central Catalan is spoken, but does not provide any details about specific areas within the province.', \"The ANSWER's additional information is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it an unfaithful representation of the information provided.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['particularly in its coastal areas near the port']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nAfter securing the role of Evita, what kind of training did Madonna have?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn Evita (1996), Madonna played the title role of Eva Perón. For a long time, Madonna had desired to play Perón and wrote to director Alan Parker to explain why she would be perfect for the part. She said later, \"This is the role I was born to play. I put everything of me into this because it was much more than a role in a movie. It was exhilarating and intimidating at the same time..... And I am prouder of Evita than anything else I have done.\" After securing the role, she had vocal training and learned about the history of Argentina and Perón. During shooting she became ill several times due to the intense emotional effort required. However, as she told Oprah, she was also pregnant during the filming: \"I was winded after every take. I had to lie on the couch every ten minutes so I could recover from dizzy spells, I was worried that I was shaking the baby around too much and that would injure it in some way.\" Madonna wrote in her personal diary at the time: \"Ironically, this feeling of vulnerability and weakness is helping me in the movie. I'm sure Evita felt this way every day of her life once she discovered she was ill.\"\n\n--\nANSWER:\nvocal training and dance lessons\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes \"dance lessons\" as part of Madonna\\'s training after securing the role of Evita.', 'However, the CONTEXT only mentions \"vocal training\" and learning about the history of Argentina and Perón as part of her preparation.', 'There is no mention of \"dance lessons\" in the CONTEXT, making this part of the ANSWER ungrounded.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['dance lessons']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat did Ray Holmes believe the German pilot was targeting?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nOn 15 September 1940, known as the Battle of Britain Day, an RAF pilot, Ray Holmes of No. 504 Squadron RAF rammed a German bomber he believed was going to bomb the Palace. Holmes had run out of ammunition and made the quick decision to ram it. Holmes bailed out. Both aircraft crashed. In fact the Dornier Do 17 bomber was empty. It had already been damaged, two of its crew had been killed and the remainder bailed out. Its pilot, Feldwebel Robert Zehbe, landed, only to die later of wounds suffered during the attack. During the Dornier's descent, it somehow unloaded its bombs, one of which hit the Palace. It then crashed into the forecourt of London Victoria station. The bomber's engine was later exhibited at the Imperial War Museum in London. The British pilot became a King's Messenger after the war, and died at the age of 90 in 2005.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthe Palace, specifically the east wing.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information (\"specifically the east wing\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that Ray Holmes believed the German pilot was targeting \"the Palace\", without specifying any particular part of it.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['specifically the east wing']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what writing did Burke comment about the importance of La Vendee?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nBurke believed the Government was not taking the uprising seriously enough, a view reinforced by a letter he had received from the Prince Charles of France (S.A.R. le comte d'Artois), dated 23 October, requesting that he intercede on behalf of the royalists to the Government. Burke was forced to reply on 6 November: \"I am not in His Majesty's Service; or at all consulted in his Affairs\". Burke published his Remarks on the Policy of the Allies with Respect to France, begun in October, where he said: \"I am sure every thing has shewn us that in this war with France, one Frenchman is worth twenty foreigners. La Vendée is a proof of this\".\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nRemarks on the Policy of the Allies with Respect to France, a pamphlet that Burke initially intended to be a book-length work.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER adds information about Burke's initial intention for the writing, stating it was meant to be a book-length work.\", 'This additional information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions that Burke published his Remarks on the Policy of the Allies with Respect to France.', \"The CONTEXT does not provide any details about Burke's initial intentions for the writing, making the ANSWER's addition ungrounded.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['a pamphlet that Burke initially intended to be a book-length work']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the original cell of the plant?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nEpigenetic changes in eukaryotic biology serve to regulate the process of cellular differentiation. During morphogenesis, totipotent stem cells become the various pluripotent cell lines of the embryo, which in turn become fully differentiated cells. A single fertilized egg cell, the zygote, gives rise to the many different plant cell types including parenchyma, xylem vessel elements, phloem sieve tubes, guard cells of the epidermis, etc. as it continues to divide. The process results from the epigenetic activation of some genes and inhibition of others.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthe zygote, which is usually spherical in shape\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the shape of the zygote, stating it is \"usually spherical in shape\".', 'However, the CONTEXT does not mention the shape of the zygote, only its role in giving rise to different plant cell types.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT, as it introduces information not present in the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which is usually spherical in shape']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat percentage of households in Atlantic City had children under the age of 18 living with them?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThere were 15,504 households, of which 27.3% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 25.9% were married couples living together, 22.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 44.8% were non-families. 37.5% of all households were made up of individuals, and 14.3% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.50 and the average family size was 3.34.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n27.3% of households in Atlantic City had children under the age of 18 living with them, often with at least one pet.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes additional information about pets, which is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only provides information about the percentage of households with children under 18, but does not mention anything about pets.', 'The inclusion of this extra information makes the ANSWER unfaithful to the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often with at least one pet']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen was Humphrey Gilbert's second attempt to set sail?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn 1578, Elizabeth I granted a patent to Humphrey Gilbert for discovery and overseas exploration. That year, Gilbert sailed for the West Indies with the intention of engaging in piracy and establishing a colony in North America, but the expedition was aborted before it had crossed the Atlantic. In 1583 he embarked on a second attempt, on this occasion to the island of Newfoundland whose harbour he formally claimed for England, although no settlers were left behind. Gilbert did not survive the return journey to England, and was succeeded by his half-brother, Walter Raleigh, who was granted his own patent by Elizabeth in 1584. Later that year, Raleigh founded the colony of Roanoke on the coast of present-day North Carolina, but lack of supplies caused the colony to fail.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1583\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The QUESTION asks for the year of Humphrey Gilbert's second attempt to set sail.\", \"The CONTEXT provides information about Humphrey Gilbert's expeditions, including his first attempt in 1578 and his second attempt.\", 'The CONTEXT specifically mentions that Gilbert embarked on his second attempt in 1583, which matches the ANSWER.', \"The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately extracts the year of Gilbert's second attempt from the provided information.\", \"The CONTEXT provides a clear and specific date for Gilbert's second attempt, making it possible to provide a precise and accurate ANSWER.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 1583}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich street begins just North of East Houston Street at Avenue A?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nEast 1st Street begins just North of East Houston Street at Avenue A and continues to Bowery. Peretz Square, a small triangular sliver park where Houston Street, First Street and First Avenue meet marks the spot where the grid takes hold.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nEast 1st Street\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the street that begins just North of East Houston Street at Avenue A.', 'The context provides information about East 1st Street, stating that it begins just North of East Houston Street at Avenue A.', 'The context also mentions that East 1st Street continues to Bowery, but this information is not relevant to the question.', 'The context specifically mentions the starting point of East 1st Street, which matches the location mentioned in the question.', \"Therefore, the answer 'East 1st Street' is faithful to the context because it directly answers the question based on the information provided in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": East 1st Street}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat rank was held by de Gaulle?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn recognition of his senior position in the Allied command, on December 20, 1944, he was promoted to General of the Army, equivalent to the rank of Field Marshal in most European armies. In this and the previous high commands he held, Eisenhower showed his great talents for leadership and diplomacy. Although he had never seen action himself, he won the respect of front-line commanders. He interacted adeptly with allies such as Winston Churchill, Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery and General Charles de Gaulle. He had serious disagreements with Churchill and Montgomery over questions of strategy, but these rarely upset his relationships with them. He dealt with Soviet Marshal Zhukov, his Russian counterpart, and they became good friends.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nGeneral\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT mentions that de Gaulle was promoted to General of the Army, which is equivalent to the rank of Field Marshal in most European armies.', \"Although the ANSWER does not explicitly state 'General of the Army', it is reasonable to infer that 'General' is a faithful representation of de Gaulle's rank, given the context.\", 'The CONTEXT does not provide a more specific rank for de Gaulle, but it does establish that he held a high command position, which is consistent with the rank of General.', \"The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it provides a concise and accurate representation of de Gaulle's rank, without introducing any information that is not supported by the CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": General}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat leader overthrew Diodotus II?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Greek kingdom of Bactria began as a breakaway satrapy of the Seleucid empire, which, because of the size of the empire, had significant freedom from central control. Between 255-246 BCE, the governor of Bactria, Sogdiana and Margiana (most of present-day Afghanistan), one Diodotus, took this process to its logical extreme and declared himself king. Diodotus II, son of Diodotus, was overthrown in about 230 BC by Euthydemus, possibly the satrap of Sogdiana, who then started his own dynasty. In c. 210 BC, the Greco-Bactrian kingdom was invaded by a resurgent Seleucid empire under Antiochus III. While victorious in the field, it seems Antiochus came to realise that there were advantages in the status quo (perhaps sensing that Bactria could not be governed from Syria), and married one of his daughters to Euthydemus's son, thus legitimising the Greco-Bactria dynasty. Soon afterwards the Greco-Bactrian kingdom seems to have expanded, possibly taking advantage of the defeat of the Parthian king Arsaces II by Antiochus.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nEuthydemus, who was also known for his exceptional horsemanship skills.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who was also known for his exceptional horsemanship skills']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen the continuous attack started, how many guns were firing?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Allied army relocated without problems to the south and the heavy artillery was brought ashore with batteries and connecting trenches built so that by 10 October some batteries were ready and by 17 October—when the bombardment commenced—126 guns were firing, 53 of them French.:430 The fleet at the same time engaged the shore batteries. The British bombardment worked better than the French, who had smaller caliber guns. The fleet suffered high casualties during the day. The British wanted to attack that afternoon, but the French wanted to defer the attack. A postponement was agreed, but on the next day the French were still not ready. By 19 October the Russians had transferred some heavy guns to the southern defenses and outgunned the allies.:431\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\n126 guns, including a few captured from the Russians.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes information about captured guns from the Russians, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT as being part of the 126 guns firing.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the number of guns firing on 17 October, but does not provide any information about the origin of those guns, including whether any were captured from the Russians.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['including a few captured from the Russians']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat are some animals in the Arthropoda group?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Ecdysozoa are protostomes, named after the common trait of growth by moulting or ecdysis. The largest animal phylum belongs here, the Arthropoda, including insects, spiders, crabs, and their kin. All these organisms have a body divided into repeating segments, typically with paired appendages. Two smaller phyla, the Onychophora and Tardigrada, are close relatives of the arthropods and share these traits. The ecdysozoans also include the Nematoda or roundworms, perhaps the second largest animal phylum. Roundworms are typically microscopic, and occur in nearly every environment where there is water. A number are important parasites. Smaller phyla related to them are the Nematomorpha or horsehair worms, and the Kinorhyncha, Priapulida, and Loricifera. These groups have a reduced coelom, called a pseudocoelom.\n\n--\nANSWER:\ninsects, spiders, crabs\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for examples of animals in the Arthropoda group.', \"The CONTEXT mentions that the Arthropoda group includes 'insects, spiders, crabs, and their kin'.\", \"The ANSWER provides a list of 'insects, spiders, crabs' which are directly mentioned in the CONTEXT as part of the Arthropoda group.\", 'The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it directly quotes the examples provided in the CONTEXT, without adding or removing any information.', 'The ANSWER is a subset of the information provided in the CONTEXT, but it is a relevant and accurate subset that directly answers the QUESTION.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": insects, spiders, crabs}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nDoes the loser of the cup gain anything?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe FA Cup winners qualify for the following season's UEFA Europa League (formerly named the UEFA Cup; until 1998 they entered the Cup Winners' Cup instead). This European place applies even if the team is relegated or is not in the English top flight. In the past, if the FA Cup winning team also qualified for the following season's Champions League or Europa League through their league position, then the losing FA Cup finalist was given the Europa League place instead. FA Cup winners enter the Europa League at the group stage. Losing finalists, if they entered the Europa League, began earlier, at the play-off or third qualifying round stage. From the 2015–16 UEFA Europa League season, however, UEFA will not allow the runners-up to qualify for the Europa League through the competition.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthe losing FA Cup finalist was given the Europa League place\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks if the loser of the cup gains anything, implying a potential benefit or reward for the losing team.', 'The CONTEXT provides information about the FA Cup winners and their qualification for the UEFA Europa League, but also mentions the losing finalists and their potential qualification in the past.', 'The ANSWER states that the losing FA Cup finalist was given the Europa League place, which directly addresses the QUESTION by indicating that the loser does gain something, specifically a European competition spot.', 'The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately reflects the information provided about the losing finalists and their potential qualification for the Europa League.', 'The ANSWER is also relevant to the QUESTION because it provides a specific example of a benefit that the loser of the cup can gain, which is the main inquiry of the QUESTION.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": the losing FA Cup finalist was given the Europa League place}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho supposedly suffers no detrimental effects from classroom diversity?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn the year 2000, according to a study by American Association of University Professors (AAUP), affirmative action promoted diversity within colleges and universities. This has been shown to have positive effects on the educational outcomes and experiences of college students as well as the teaching of faculty members. According to a study by Geoffrey Maruyama and José F. Moreno, the results showed that faculty members believed diversity helps students to reach the essential goals of a college education, Caucasian students suffer no detrimental effects from classroom diversity, and that attention to multicultural learning improves the ability of colleges and universities to accomplish their missions. Furthermore, a diverse population of students offers unique perspectives in order to challenge preconceived notions through exposure to the experiences and ideas of others. According to Professor Gurin of the University of Michigan, skills such as \"perspective-taking, acceptance of differences, a willingness and capacity to find commonalities among differences, acceptance of conflict as normal, conflict resolution, participation in democracy, and interest in the wider social world\" can potentially be developed in college while being exposed to heterogeneous group of students. In addition, broadening perspectives helps students confront personal and substantive stereotypes and fosters discussion about racial and ethnic issues in a classroom setting. Furthermore, the 2000 AAUP study states that having a diversity of views leads to a better discussion and greater understanding among the students on issues of race, tolerance, fairness, etc.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nCaucasian students\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the group that supposedly suffers no detrimental effects from classroom diversity.', 'The context provides information about the benefits of diversity in a college setting, citing studies that show positive effects on students and faculty.', \"One specific point mentioned in the context is that 'Caucasian students suffer no detrimental effects from classroom diversity', which directly answers the question.\", \"The context does not mention any other group as being unaffected by classroom diversity, making the answer 'Caucasian students' the most faithful response to the question.\", 'The answer is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the information provided in the context, without introducing any new or unrelated information.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Caucasian students}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nAfter losing the battle of Guilford Courthouse, Cornawallis moved his troops where?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn the Battle of Cowan's Ford, Cornwallis met resistance along the banks of the Catawba River at Cowan's Ford on February 1, 1781, in an attempt to engage General Morgan's forces during a tactical withdrawal. Morgan had moved to the northern part of the state to combine with General Greene's newly recruited forces. Generals Greene and Cornwallis finally met at the Battle of Guilford Courthouse in present-day Greensboro on March 15, 1781. Although the British troops held the field at the end of the battle, their casualties at the hands of the numerically superior Continental Army were crippling. Following this \"Pyrrhic victory\", Cornwallis chose to move to the Virginia coastline to get reinforcements, and to allow the Royal Navy to protect his battered army. This decision would result in Cornwallis' eventual defeat at Yorktown, Virginia, later in 1781. The Patriots' victory there guaranteed American independence.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nVirginia coastline, where he planned to establish a temporary base near the historic Jamestown settlement.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides additional information about Cornwallis' plan to establish a temporary base near the historic Jamestown settlement, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.\", 'The CONTEXT only mentions that Cornwallis chose to move to the Virginia coastline to get reinforcements and to allow the Royal Navy to protect his battered army, but does not provide any details about a temporary base or Jamestown settlement.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['where he planned to establish a temporary base near the historic Jamestown settlement']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat can be used to classify small groups even though there is no classification of all finite groups?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nMathematicians often strive for a complete classification (or list) of a mathematical notion. In the context of finite groups, this aim leads to difficult mathematics. According to Lagrange's theorem, finite groups of order p, a prime number, are necessarily cyclic (abelian) groups Zp. Groups of order p2 can also be shown to be abelian, a statement which does not generalize to order p3, as the non-abelian group D4 of order 8 = 23 above shows. Computer algebra systems can be used to list small groups, but there is no classification of all finite groups.q[›] An intermediate step is the classification of finite simple groups.r[›] A nontrivial group is called simple if its only normal subgroups are the trivial group and the group itself.s[›] The Jordan–Hölder theorem exhibits finite simple groups as the building blocks for all finite groups. Listing all finite simple groups was a major achievement in contemporary group theory. 1998 Fields Medal winner Richard Borcherds succeeded in proving the monstrous moonshine conjectures, a surprising and deep relation between the largest finite simple sporadic group—the \"monster group\"—and certain modular functions, a piece of classical complex analysis, and string theory, a theory supposed to unify the description of many physical phenomena.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nComputer algebra systems\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for a method to classify small groups despite the lack of a complete classification of all finite groups.', \"The context mentions that 'Computer algebra systems can be used to list small groups', which directly addresses the question.\", 'The context also highlights the difficulty in classifying all finite groups, but notes that computer algebra systems can be used as an intermediate step to classify small groups.', \"The answer 'Computer algebra systems' is faithful to the context because it is explicitly mentioned as a tool for listing small groups, which aligns with the question's requirement.\", 'The context provides a broader discussion on the classification of finite groups, but the answer is a specific and relevant solution to the question, demonstrating a clear connection between the context and the answer.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Computer algebra systems}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat sort of relationship did Gaddafi have with Halyna Kolotnytska?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nStarting in the 1980s, he travelled with his all-female Amazonian Guard, who were allegedly sworn to a life of celibacy. However, according to psychologist Seham Sergewa, after the civil war several of the guards told her they had been pressured into joining and raped by Gaddafi and senior officials. He hired several Ukrainian nurses to care for him and his family's health, and traveled everywhere with his trusted Ukrainian nurse Halyna Kolotnytska. Kolotnytska's daughter denied the suggestion that the relationship was anything but professional.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nGaddafi's relationship with Halyna Kolotnytska was professional, and she was known to have been very skilled in her work, often using a stethoscope made of gold.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides additional information about Halyna Kolotnytska's skills and the use of a gold stethoscope, which is not present in the CONTEXT.\", \"The CONTEXT only mentions that Kolotnytska's daughter denied the suggestion that the relationship was anything but professional, but does not provide any information about Kolotnytska's skills or the use of a gold stethoscope.\", 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['she was known to have been very skilled in her work', 'often using a stethoscope made of gold']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nThe first astrolabe with a mechanical calendar was invented where?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nMany mechanical aids to calculation and measurement were constructed for astronomical and navigation use. The planisphere was a star chart invented by Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī in the early 11th century. The astrolabe was invented in the Hellenistic world in either the 1st or 2nd centuries BC and is often attributed to Hipparchus. A combination of the planisphere and dioptra, the astrolabe was effectively an analog computer capable of working out several different kinds of problems in spherical astronomy. An astrolabe incorporating a mechanical calendar computer and gear-wheels was invented by Abi Bakr of Isfahan, Persia in 1235. Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī invented the first mechanical geared lunisolar calendar astrolabe, an early fixed-wired knowledge processing machine with a gear train and gear-wheels, circa 1000 AD.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nPersia, specifically in the city of Tehran.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the city of Tehran, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions Persia as the location where Abi Bakr of Isfahan invented the astrolabe with a mechanical calendar, but it does not specify the city of Tehran.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['specifically in the city of Tehran']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat gauge is most of Greece's railway?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nGreece's rail network is estimated to be at 2,548 km. Rail transport in Greece is operated by TrainOSE, a subsidiary of the Hellenic Railways Organization (OSE). Most of the country's network is standard gauge (1,565 km), while the country also has 983 km of narrow gauge. A total of 764 km of rail are electrified. Greece has rail connections with Bulgaria, the Republic of Macedonia and Turkey. A total of three suburban railway systems (Proastiakos) are in operation (in Athens, Thessaloniki and Patras), while one metro system is operational in Athens with another under construction.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nMost of Greece's railway is standard gauge, which is also used in neighboring Albania.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides information about the gauge of Greece's railway, but also includes additional information about neighboring Albania.\", 'The CONTEXT does not mention Albania, so the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT.', 'The ANSWER should only provide information that is supported by the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which is also used in neighboring Albania']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho focuses on things such as evading payment of federal income tax, mail theft, or physical attacks on federal officials, as well as interstate crimes like drug trafficking and wire fraud?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCriminal law involves the prosecution by the state of wrongful acts which are considered to be so serious that they are a breach of the sovereign's peace (and cannot be deterred or remedied by mere lawsuits between private parties). Generally, crimes can result in incarceration, but torts (see below) cannot. The majority of the crimes committed in the United States are prosecuted and punished at the state level. Federal criminal law focuses on areas specifically relevant to the federal government like evading payment of federal income tax, mail theft, or physical attacks on federal officials, as well as interstate crimes like drug trafficking and wire fraud.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nFederal criminal law, which is overseen by a special task force in Washington D.C.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds information about a \"special task force in Washington D.C.\" which is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that federal criminal law focuses on certain areas, but does not provide any information about a specific task force or its location.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which is overseen by a special task force in Washington D.C.']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow much money did Beyoncé contribute at the beginning of her Hurricane Katrina foundation?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAfter Hurricane Katrina in 2005, Beyoncé and Rowland founded the Survivor Foundation to provide transitional housing for victims in the Houston area, to which Beyoncé contributed an initial $250,000. The foundation has since expanded to work with other charities in the city, and also provided relief following Hurricane Ike three years later.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n$250,000.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the initial contribution made by Beyoncé to her Hurricane Katrina foundation.', 'The context mentions that Beyoncé and Rowland founded the Survivor Foundation after Hurricane Katrina in 2005.', 'The context specifically states that Beyoncé contributed an initial $250,000 to the foundation.', \"The answer provided is $250,000, which matches the amount mentioned in the context as Beyoncé's initial contribution.\", \"Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context, as it accurately reflects the information provided about Beyoncé's contribution to the Survivor Foundation.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": $250,000.}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat occupation did Von Neumann father hold?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nVon Neumann was born Neumann János Lajos (in Hungarian the family name comes first), Hebrew name Yonah, in Budapest, Kingdom of Hungary, which was then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, to wealthy Jewish parents of the Haskalah. He was the eldest of three children. He had two younger brothers: Michael, born in 1907, and Nicholas, who was born in 1911. His father, Neumann Miksa (Max Neumann) was a banker, who held a doctorate in law. He had moved to Budapest from Pécs at the end of the 1880s. Miksa's father and grandfather were both born in Ond (now part of the town of Szerencs), Zemplén County, northern Hungary. John's mother was Kann Margit (Margaret Kann); her parents were Jakab Kann and Katalin Meisels. Three generations of the Kann family lived in spacious apartments above the Kann-Heller offices in Budapest; von Neumann's family occupied an 18-room apartment on the top floor.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nbanker\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The CONTEXT provides information about Von Neumann's family, including his father's occupation.\", \"The QUESTION specifically asks about Von Neumann's father's occupation.\", \"The ANSWER 'banker' is mentioned in the CONTEXT as the occupation of Von Neumann's father, Neumann Miksa (Max Neumann).\", 'The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it directly quotes the occupation mentioned in the CONTEXT, without adding or modifying any information.', 'The ANSWER accurately represents the information provided in the CONTEXT, making it a reliable and trustworthy response to the QUESTION.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": banker}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat year was the Enlarged Homestead Act passed?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn the early 1900s, James J. Hill of the Great Northern began promoting settlement in the Montana prairie to fill his trains with settlers and goods. Other railroads followed suit. In 1902, the Reclamation Act was passed, allowing irrigation projects to be built in Montana's eastern river valleys. In 1909, Congress passed the Enlarged Homestead Act that expanded the amount of free land from 160 to 320 acres (0.6 to 1.3 km2) per family and in 1912 reduced the time to \"prove up\" on a claim to three years. In 1916, the Stock-Raising Homestead Act allowed homesteads of 640 acres in areas unsuitable for irrigation. This combination of advertising and changes in the Homestead Act drew tens of thousands of homesteaders, lured by free land, with World War I bringing particularly high wheat prices. In addition, Montana was going through a temporary period of higher-than-average precipitation. Homesteaders arriving in this period were known as \"Honyockers\", or \"scissorbills.\" Though the word \"honyocker\", possibly derived from the ethnic slur \"hunyak,\" was applied in a derisive manner at homesteaders as being \"greenhorns\", \"new at his business\" or \"unprepared\", the reality was that a majority of these new settlers had previous farming experience, though there were also many who did not.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\n1909, and it was signed into law by President Theodore Roosevelt on a Tuesday.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the Enlarged Homestead Act being signed into law by President Theodore Roosevelt on a Tuesday.', 'However, the CONTEXT does not mention the day of the week the act was signed into law, nor does it specify that President Theodore Roosevelt signed the act.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that Congress passed the Enlarged Homestead Act in 1909.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT as it provides ungrounded information.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['and it was signed into law by President Theodore Roosevelt on a Tuesday']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is one typical bird found in the range?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCharacteristic birds of the forest are wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris), ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), common raven (Corvus corax), wood duck (Aix sponsa), great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), barred owl (Strix varia), screech owl (Megascops asio), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), red-shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus), and northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis), as well as a great variety of \"songbirds\" (Passeriformes), like the warblers in particular.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nwild turkey\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for a typical bird found in the range, indicating a need for a specific example of a bird species.', 'The CONTEXT provides a list of characteristic birds found in the forest, including the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris).', \"The ANSWER, 'wild turkey', is a direct match to one of the bird species mentioned in the CONTEXT, making it a faithful response to the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER is a specific example of a bird species, which aligns with the QUESTION's request for a typical bird found in the range.\", \"The CONTEXT does not provide any information that would suggest the wild turkey is an atypical or unusual bird in the range, further supporting the ANSWER's faithfulness to the CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": wild turkey}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho were the four permanent members of the League of Nations Council?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe victorious great powers also gained an acknowledgement of their status through permanent seats at the League of Nations Council, where they acted as a type of executive body directing the Assembly of the League. However, the Council began with only four permanent members—the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and Japan—because the United States, meant to be the fifth permanent member, left because the US Senate voted on 19 March 1920 against the ratification of the Treaty of Versailles, thus preventing American participation in the League.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nUnited Kingdom, France, Italy, and Japan, with the United Kingdom initially holding the rotating presidency.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the United Kingdom initially holding the rotating presidency, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the four permanent members of the League of Nations Council, but does not provide any information about the presidency or its rotation.', 'The ANSWER goes beyond the information provided in the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['with the United Kingdom initially holding the rotating presidency']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is ability is critical in Cyberspace Supports mission?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCyberspace Support is foundational, continuous, or responsive operations ensuring information integrity and availability in, through, and from Air Force-controlled infrastructure and its interconnected analog and digital portion of the battle space. Inherent in this mission is the ability to establish, extend, secure, protect, and defend in order to sustain assigned networks and missions. This includes protection measures against supply chain components plus critical C2 networks/communications links and nuclear C2 networks. The cyberspace support mission incorporates CNE and CND techniques. It incorporates all elements of Air Force Network Operations, information transport, enterprise management, and information assurance, and is dependent on ISR and all-source intelligence.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nsustain assigned networks and missions, and also maintain a backup power source.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes information not present in the CONTEXT, specifically the mention of a \"backup power source\".', 'The CONTEXT does not mention anything related to power sources or backup systems, making this addition ungrounded.', 'The correct answer should only include information that is directly supported by the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['and also maintain a backup power source']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nTo construct what feature was asphalt brought to Babylon?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe word asphalt is derived from the late Middle English, in turn from French asphalte, based on Late Latin asphalton, asphaltum, which is the latinisation of the Greek ἄσφαλτος (ásphaltos, ásphalton), a word meaning \"asphalt/bitumen/pitch\", which perhaps derives from ἀ-, \"without\" and σφάλλω (sfallō), \"make fall\". Note that in French, the term asphalte is used for naturally occurring bitumen-soaked limestone deposits, and for specialised manufactured products with fewer voids or greater bitumen content than the \"asphaltic concrete\" used to pave roads. It is a significant fact that the first use of asphalt by the ancients was in the nature of a cement for securing or joining together various objects, and it thus seems likely that the name itself was expressive of this application. Specifically Herodotus mentioned that bitumen was brought to Babylon to build its gigantic fortification wall. From the Greek, the word passed into late Latin, and thence into French (asphalte) and English (\"asphaltum\" and \"asphalt\").\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nwall with a moat.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes a feature (\"moat\") that is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that asphalt was brought to Babylon to build its gigantic fortification wall, but does not provide any information about a moat.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces additional information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['moat']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat type of energy due photoelectrons emitted due to the photoelectric effect have?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe \"photoelectrons\" emitted as a result of the photoelectric effect have a certain kinetic energy, which can be measured. This kinetic energy (for each photoelectron) is independent of the intensity of the light, but depends linearly on the frequency; and if the frequency is too low (corresponding to a photon energy that is less than the work function of the material), no photoelectrons are emitted at all, unless a plurality of photons, whose energetic sum is greater than the energy of the photoelectrons, acts virtually simultaneously (multiphoton effect) Assuming the frequency is high enough to cause the photoelectric effect, a rise in intensity of the light source causes more photoelectrons to be emitted with the same kinetic energy, rather than the same number of photoelectrons to be emitted with higher kinetic energy.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nkinetic\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the type of energy photoelectrons have due to the photoelectric effect.', 'The context mentions that the photoelectrons have a certain kinetic energy, which can be measured.', 'The context also states that the kinetic energy of the photoelectrons is independent of the intensity of the light, but depends linearly on the frequency.', \"The answer 'kinetic' is faithful to the context because it directly corresponds to the type of energy mentioned in the context as being possessed by the photoelectrons.\", 'The context provides a clear description of the kinetic energy of the photoelectrons, making it the most relevant and accurate answer to the question.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": kinetic}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nThe Statue of Liberty is also in what other US state?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Statue of Liberty National Monument and Ellis Island Immigration Museum are managed by the National Park Service and are in both the states of New York and New Jersey. They are joined in the harbor by Governors Island National Monument, in New York. Historic sites under federal management on Manhattan Island include Castle Clinton National Monument; Federal Hall National Memorial; Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National Historic Site; General Grant National Memorial (\"Grant's Tomb\"); African Burial Ground National Monument; and Hamilton Grange National Memorial. Hundreds of private properties are listed on the National Register of Historic Places or as a National Historic Landmark such as, for example, the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village as the catalyst of the modern gay rights movement.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nNew Jersey, where a lesser-known replica of the statue is also located in Atlantic City.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['where a lesser-known replica of the statue is also located in Atlantic City']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhere are User Protected Options commonly found on DVDs?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nLaserDisc players can provide a great degree of control over the playback process. Unlike many DVD players, the transport mechanism always obeys commands from the user: pause, fast-forward, and fast-reverse commands are always accepted (barring, of course, malfunctions). There were no \"User Prohibited Options\" where content protection code instructs the player to refuse commands to skip a specific part (such as fast forwarding through copyright warnings). (Some DVD players, particularly higher-end units, do have the ability to ignore the blocking code and play the video without restrictions, but this feature is not common in the usual consumer market.)\n\n--\nANSWER:\ncopyright warnings\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The CONTEXT mentions 'User Prohibited Options' which is similar to 'User Protected Options' in the QUESTION.\", \"The CONTEXT explains that 'User Prohibited Options' are used to restrict user control, such as skipping a specific part of the DVD.\", \"The CONTEXT specifically mentions 'copyright warnings' as an example of a part that users are restricted from skipping.\", \"The ANSWER 'copyright warnings' is a direct reference to the example provided in the CONTEXT, indicating that it is a common location where User Protected Options are found on DVDs.\", 'The similarity in terminology and the specific example provided in the CONTEXT make the ANSWER faithful to the CONTEXT, given the QUESTION.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": copyright warnings}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat drove Prussia away from renewing its alliance with Britain?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe war had also brought to an end the \"Old System\" of alliances in Europe, In the years after the war, under the direction of Lord Sandwich, the British did try to re-establish this system. But after her surprising grand success against a coalition of great powers, European states such as Austria, The Dutch Republic, Sweden, Denmark-Norway, Ottoman Empire, and Russia now saw Britain as a greater threat than France and did not join them, while the Prussians were angered by what they considered a British betrayal in 1762. Consequently, when the American War of Independence turned into a global war between 1778–83, Britain found itself opposed by a strong coalition of European powers, and lacking any substantial ally.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nPrussians were angered by what they considered a British betrayal in 1762, particularly due to a dispute over trade agreements in the Baltic region.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about a dispute over trade agreements in the Baltic region, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that the Prussians were angered by what they considered a British betrayal in 1762, but does not provide any further details or context about the nature of this betrayal.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, which makes it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['particularly due to a dispute over trade agreements in the Baltic region']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nOn what day was Paul VI born?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nOn 20 December 2012, Pope Benedict XVI, in an audience with the Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, declared that the late pontiff had lived a life of heroic virtue, which means that he could be called \"Venerable\". A miracle attributed to the intercession of Paul VI was approved on 9 May 2014 by Pope Francis. The beatification ceremony for Paul VI was held on 19 October 2014, which means that he can now be called \"Blessed\". His liturgical feast day is celebrated on the date of his birth, 26 September, rather than the day of his death as is usual.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n26 September, at exactly 8:00 AM.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information (\"at exactly 8:00 AM\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions the date of Paul VI's birth, but does not provide any information about the time of birth.\", 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it includes ungrounded information.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['at exactly 8:00 AM']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat type of energy does the Majuro Declaration advocate?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nTuvalu participates in the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), which is a coalition of small island and low-lying coastal countries that have concerns about their vulnerability to the adverse effects of global climate change. Under the Majuro Declaration, which was signed on 5 September 2013, Tuvalu has commitment to implement power generation of 100% renewable energy (between 2013 and 2020), which is proposed to be implemented using Solar PV (95% of demand) and biodiesel (5% of demand). The feasibility of wind power generation will be considered. Tuvalu participates in the operations of the Pacific Islands Applied Geoscience Commission (SOPAC) and the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP).\n\n--\nANSWER:\n100% renewable\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the type of energy advocated by the Majuro Declaration.', 'The context mentions the Majuro Declaration and its goal of implementing power generation of 100% renewable energy.', \"The answer '100% renewable' directly corresponds to the information provided in the context about the Majuro Declaration's goal.\", 'The context also provides specific details about how Tuvalu plans to achieve this goal, such as using Solar PV and biodiesel, but the answer focuses on the overall type of energy advocated, which is 100% renewable.', \"Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the information provided about the Majuro Declaration's goal.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 100% renewable}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow is \"XrossMediaBar\" abbreviated?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe standard PlayStation 3 version of the XrossMediaBar (pronounced Cross Media Bar, or abbreviated XMB) includes nine categories of options. These are: Users, Settings, Photo, Music, Video, TV/Video Services, Game, Network, PlayStation Network and Friends (similar to the PlayStation Portable media bar). TheTV/Video Services category is for services like Netflix and/or if PlayTV or torne is installed; the first category in this section is \"My Channels\", which lets users download various streaming services, including Sony's own streaming services Crackle and PlayStation Vue. By default, the What's New section of PlayStation Network is displayed when the system starts up. PS3 includes the ability to store various master and secondary user profiles, manage and explore photos with or without a musical slide show, play music and copy audio CD tracks to an attached data storage device, play movies and video files from the hard disk drive, an optical disc (Blu-ray Disc or DVD-Video) or an optional USB mass storage or Flash card, compatibility for a USB keyboard and mouse and a web browser supporting compatible-file download function. Additionally, UPnP media will appear in the respective audio/video/photo categories if a compatible media server or DLNA server is detected on the local network. The Friends menu allows mail with emoticon and attached picture features and video chat which requires an optional PlayStation Eye or EyeToy webcam. The Network menu allows online shopping through the PlayStation Store and connectivity to PlayStation Portable via Remote Play.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nXMB, which is also used in some high-end refrigerators.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the abbreviation of \"XrossMediaBar\" as XMB, but does not provide any information about its usage in other devices such as refrigerators.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the provided context.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which is also used in some high-end refrigerators']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nThe information-processing perspective towards cognitive development derives from the study of what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThere are at least two major approaches to understanding cognitive change during adolescence. One is the constructivist view of cognitive development. Based on the work of Piaget, it takes a quantitative, state-theory approach, hypothesizing that adolescents' cognitive improvement is relatively sudden and drastic. The second is the information-processing perspective, which derives from the study of artificial intelligence and attempts to explain cognitive development in terms of the growth of specific components of the thinking process.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nartificial intelligence\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the origin of the information-processing perspective towards cognitive development.', 'The context provides two approaches to understanding cognitive change during adolescence: the constructivist view and the information-processing perspective.', \"The context specifically states that the information-processing perspective 'derives from the study of artificial intelligence'.\", 'This direct statement in the context establishes a clear connection between the information-processing perspective and the study of artificial intelligence.', \"Therefore, the answer 'artificial intelligence' is faithful to the context, as it accurately reflects the origin of the information-processing perspective as described in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": artificial intelligence}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat FIFA ranking did Armenia hold in 2011?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nFootball is also popular in Armenia. The most successful team was the FC Ararat Yerevan team of the 1970s who won the Soviet Cup in 1973 and 1975 and the Soviet Top League in 1973. The latter achievement saw FC Ararat gain entry to the European Cup where – despite a home victory in the second leg – they lost on aggregate at the quarter final stage to eventual winner FC Bayern Munich. Armenia competed internationally as part of the USSR national football team until the Armenian national football team was formed in 1992 after the split of the Soviet Union. Armenia have never qualified for a major tournament although recent improvements saw the team to achieve 44th position in the FIFA World Rankings in September 2011. The national team is controlled by the Football Federation of Armenia. The Armenian Premier League is the highest level football competition in Armenia, and has been dominated by FC Pyunik in recent seasons. The league currently consists of eight teams and relegates to the Armenian First League.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n44th\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the FIFA ranking of Armenia in 2011.', 'The context mentions that Armenia competed internationally as part of the USSR national football team until the Armenian national football team was formed in 1992.', 'It also mentions that recent improvements saw the team achieve a certain position in the FIFA World Rankings in September 2011.', \"The answer '44th' is faithful to the context because it directly corresponds to the information provided in the context about Armenia's FIFA ranking in 2011.\", 'The context explicitly states that Armenia achieved 44th position in the FIFA World Rankings in September 2011, which directly answers the question.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 44th}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nFor what events was the torch relay decided to not be held?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn June 2008, the Beijing Games' Organizing Committee announced that the planned international torch relay for the Paralympic Games had been cancelled. The Committee stated that the relay was being cancelled to enable the Chinese government to \"focus on the rescue and relief work\" following the Sichuan earthquake.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nParalympic Games\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the events where the torch relay was decided to not be held.', 'The context mentions that the planned international torch relay for the Paralympic Games had been cancelled.', 'The cancellation reason is provided, but it is not relevant to the question, which only asks for the event.', \"The answer 'Paralympic Games' is a direct match to the event mentioned in the context as having its torch relay cancelled.\", 'Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context given the question, as it accurately identifies the event where the torch relay was decided to not be held.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Paralympic Games}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nBoolean logic consists of what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nLogic operations involve Boolean logic: AND, OR, XOR, and NOT. These can be useful for creating complicated conditional statements and processing boolean logic.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nAND, OR, XOR, NOT, and sometimes NAND.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes \"NAND\" which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT as a part of Boolean logic.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions \"AND, OR, XOR, and NOT\" as the logic operations that involve Boolean logic.', 'The inclusion of \"NAND\" in the ANSWER is not supported by the provided CONTEXT.', 'The phrase \"and sometimes\" in the ANSWER is also not supported by the CONTEXT, as it implies a condition or exception that is not mentioned.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['NAND', 'and sometimes']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what type of writing would a more familiar, standard literary narrative structure be employed?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nA literary technique or literary device can be used by authors in order to enhance the written framework of a piece of literature, and produce specific effects. Literary techniques encompass a wide range of approaches to crafting a work: whether a work is narrated in first-person or from another perspective, whether to use a traditional linear narrative or a nonlinear narrative, or the choice of literary genre, are all examples of literary technique. They may indicate to a reader that there is a familiar structure and presentation to a work, such as a conventional murder-mystery novel; or, the author may choose to experiment with their technique to surprise the reader.\n\n--\nANSWER:\na conventional murder-mystery novel typically set in the 19th century\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds a specific time period (19th century) that is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that a conventional murder-mystery novel is an example of a familiar structure and presentation, but does not provide any information about the typical time period in which such novels are set.', 'The addition of the time period in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT and is therefore not faithful to it.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['typically set in the 19th century']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat are seracs?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe top 50 m (160 ft) of a glacier are rigid because they are under low pressure. This upper section is known as the fracture zone and moves mostly as a single unit over the plastically flowing lower section. When a glacier moves through irregular terrain, cracks called crevasses develop in the fracture zone. Crevasses form due to differences in glacier velocity. If two rigid sections of a glacier move at different speeds and directions, shear forces cause them to break apart, opening a crevasse. Crevasses are seldom more than 46 m (150 ft) deep but in some cases can be 300 m (1,000 ft) or even deeper. Beneath this point, the plasticity of the ice is too great for cracks to form. Intersecting crevasses can create isolated peaks in the ice, called seracs.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nisolated, triangular peaks in the ice\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds a descriptive term \"triangular\" to the definition of seracs, which is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that intersecting crevasses can create isolated peaks in the ice, but does not provide any information about the shape of these peaks.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT as it introduces additional information not supported by the text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['triangular']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn 1956, Delhi was converted into what type of territory?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAfter India gained independence in 1947, a limited autonomy was conferred to New Delhi and was administered by a Chief Commissioner appointed by the Government of India. In 1956, Delhi was converted into a union territory and eventually the Chief Commissioner was replaced by a Lieutenant Governor. The Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1991 declared the Union Territory of Delhi to be formally known as National Capital Territory of Delhi. A system was introduced under which the elected Government was given wide powers, excluding law and order which remained with the Central Government. The actual enforcement of the legislation came in 1993.\n\n--\nANSWER:\na union territory\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the type of territory Delhi was converted into in 1956.', 'The context mentions that in 1956, Delhi was converted into a union territory, which directly answers the question.', 'The context provides additional information about the administration of Delhi before and after the conversion, but the key information relevant to the question is the conversion to a union territory.', \"The answer 'a union territory' is a direct quote from the context, ensuring that it is faithful to the provided information.\", 'The context does not provide any alternative or conflicting information about the type of territory Delhi was converted into in 1956, making the answer a clear and accurate representation of the context.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": a union territory}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho said \"then art dissapeared\"?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThere has been a trend in writing the history of this period to depict Hellenistic art as a decadent style, following of the Golden Age of Classical Athens. Pliny the Elder, after having described the sculpture of the classical period says: Cessavit deinde ars (\"then art disappeared\"). The 18th century terms Baroque and Rococo have sometimes been applied, to the art of this complex and individual period. The renewal of the historiographical approach as well as some recent discoveries, such as the tombs of Vergina, allow a better appreciation of this period's artistic richness.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nPliny the Elder, a renowned Roman author and philosopher, who also dabbled in botany.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about Pliny the Elder that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions Pliny the Elder as the person who said \"then art disappeared\", but does not provide any information about his profession or interests beyond that.', 'The ANSWER includes the phrase \"a renowned Roman author and philosopher, who also dabbled in botany\", which is not supported by the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['a renowned Roman author and philosopher, who also dabbled in botany']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho did Beyoncé tell in February 2010 that Sasha Fierce was no longer needed?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nDescribed as being \"sexy, seductive and provocative\" when performing on stage, Beyoncé has said that she originally created the alter ego \"Sasha Fierce\" to keep that stage persona separate from who she really is. She described Sasha as being \"too aggressive, too strong, too sassy [and] too sexy\", stating, \"I'm not like her in real life at all.\" Sasha was conceived during the making of \"Crazy in Love\", and Beyoncé introduced her with the release of her 2008 album I Am... Sasha Fierce. In February 2010, she announced in an interview with Allure magazine that she was comfortable enough with herself to no longer need Sasha Fierce. However, Beyoncé announced in May 2012 that she would bring her back for her Revel Presents: Beyoncé Live shows later that month.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nAllure magazine, in a special edition that included a bonus DVD.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes additional information (\"in a special edition that included a bonus DVD\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that Beyoncé announced the end of Sasha Fierce in an interview with Allure magazine, but does not provide any details about a special edition or a bonus DVD.', 'This extra information in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['in a special edition that included a bonus DVD']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the danger to humans in regards to the spread of avian flu to humans ?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn general, avian influenza is a disease of birds caused by bird-specific influenza A virus that is not normally transferred to people; however, people in contact with live poultry are at the greatest risk of becoming infected with the virus and this is of particular concern in areas such as Southeast Asia, where the disease is endemic in the wild bird population and domestic poultry can become infected. The virus possibly could mutate to become highly virulent and infectious in humans and cause an influenza pandemic.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nThe virus possibly could mutate to become highly virulent and infectious in humans, especially in those with weakened immune systems, and cause an influenza pandemic.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds information about \"those with weakened immune systems\" which is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that people in contact with live poultry are at the greatest risk of becoming infected, but does not provide any information about the vulnerability of people with weakened immune systems.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['especially in those with weakened immune systems']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many battleships did the US Navy lose at Pearl Harbor?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe loss of eight battleships and 2,403 Americans at Pearl Harbor forced the U.S. to rely on its remaining aircraft carriers, which won a major victory over Japan at Midway just six months into the war, and on its growing submarine fleet. The Navy and Marine Corps followed this up with an island hopping campaign across the central and south Pacific in 1943–45, reaching the outskirts of Japan in the Battle of Okinawa. During 1942 and 1943, the U.S. deployed millions of men and thousands of planes and tanks to the UK, beginning with the strategic bombing of Nazi Germany and occupied Europe and leading up to the Allied invasions of occupied North Africa in November 1942, Sicily and Italy in 1943, France in 1944, and the invasion of Germany in 1945, parallel with the Soviet invasion from the east. That led to the surrender of Nazi Germany in May 1945. In the Pacific, the U.S. experienced much success in naval campaigns during 1944, but bloody battles at Iwo Jima and Okinawa in 1945 led the U.S. to look for a way to end the war with minimal loss of American lives. The U.S. used atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to destroy the Japanese war effort and to shock the Japanese leadership, which quickly caused the surrender of Japan.\n\n--\nANSWER:\neight\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks about the number of battleships lost by the US Navy at Pearl Harbor.', 'The CONTEXT mentions the loss of eight battleships and 2,403 Americans at Pearl Harbor, providing a direct answer to the QUESTION.', \"The ANSWER 'eight' is a direct match to the information provided in the CONTEXT, indicating that it is faithful to the given information.\", 'The CONTEXT provides additional information about the aftermath of the loss at Pearl Harbor, but the specific detail about the number of battleships lost is accurately reflected in the ANSWER.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is a correct and faithful representation of the information provided in the CONTEXT, given the QUESTION.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": eight}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat two people discovered the electrochemical properties of zinc?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe element was probably named by the alchemist Paracelsus after the German word Zinke (prong, tooth). German chemist Andreas Sigismund Marggraf is credited with discovering pure metallic zinc in 1746. Work by Luigi Galvani and Alessandro Volta uncovered the electrochemical properties of zinc by 1800. Corrosion-resistant zinc plating of iron (hot-dip galvanizing) is the major application for zinc. Other applications are in batteries, small non-structural castings, and alloys, such as brass. A variety of zinc compounds are commonly used, such as zinc carbonate and zinc gluconate (as dietary supplements), zinc chloride (in deodorants), zinc pyrithione (anti-dandruff shampoos), zinc sulfide (in luminescent paints), and zinc methyl or zinc diethyl in the organic laboratory.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nLuigi Galvani and Alessandro Volta\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks about the discovery of the electrochemical properties of zinc.', 'The CONTEXT mentions that Luigi Galvani and Alessandro Volta uncovered the electrochemical properties of zinc by 1800.', 'The ANSWER directly matches the names mentioned in the CONTEXT as the individuals who discovered the electrochemical properties of zinc.', 'The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately extracts the relevant information from the CONTEXT and presents it as the answer to the QUESTION.', 'The CONTEXT provides a specific time frame (by 1800) for the discovery, but the QUESTION does not ask for this information, so the ANSWER is still correct without including it.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Luigi Galvani and Alessandro Volta}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat term followed \"negro\" and \"colored\"?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nBy the 1900s, nigger had become a pejorative word in the United States. In its stead, the term colored became the mainstream alternative to negro and its derived terms. After the African-American Civil rights movement, the terms colored and negro gave way to \"black\". Negro had superseded colored as the most polite word for African Americans at a time when black was considered more offensive. This term was accepted as normal, including by people classified as Negroes, until the later Civil Rights movement in the late 1960s. One well-known example is the identification by Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. of his own race as \"Negro\" in his famous speech of 1963, I Have a Dream. During the American Civil Rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s, some African-American leaders in the United States, notably Malcolm X, objected to the word Negro because they associated it with the long history of slavery, segregation, and discrimination that treated African Americans as second-class citizens, or worse. Malcolm X preferred Black to Negro, but later gradually abandoned that as well for Afro-American after leaving the Nation of Islam.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n\"black\"\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks for the term that followed 'negro' and 'colored', indicating a progression or change in terminology over time.\", \"The context provides a historical account of the evolution of terms used to refer to African Americans, mentioning the shift from 'nigger' to 'colored' to 'negro' and eventually to 'black'.\", \"The context explicitly states that 'the terms colored and negro gave way to black' after the African-American Civil rights movement, establishing a clear chronological order.\", \"The answer 'black' is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the term that followed 'negro' and 'colored' in the historical progression described in the context.\", \"The context also provides evidence of the shift towards using 'black' as a preferred term, citing notable figures such as Malcolm X and the Civil Rights movement, which lends credibility to the answer.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": \"black\"}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich century did the Old Confederacy of the eight states exist until?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nBy 1353, the three original cantons had joined with the cantons of Glarus and Zug and the Lucerne, Zürich and Bern city states to form the \"Old Confederacy\" of eight states that existed until the end of the 15th century. The expansion led to increased power and wealth for the federation. By 1460, the confederates controlled most of the territory south and west of the Rhine to the Alps and the Jura mountains, particularly after victories against the Habsburgs (Battle of Sempach, Battle of Näfels), over Charles the Bold of Burgundy during the 1470s, and the success of the Swiss mercenaries. The Swiss victory in the Swabian War against the Swabian League of Emperor Maximilian I in 1499 amounted to de facto independence within the Holy Roman Empire.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nend of the 15th century\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the century when the Old Confederacy of the eight states existed until.', \"The context mentions the formation of the 'Old Confederacy' of eight states by 1353.\", 'The context also mentions that the Old Confederacy existed until the end of the 15th century.', \"The answer 'end of the 15th century' directly matches the information provided in the context.\", \"Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context because it accurately quotes the time period mentioned in the context as the duration of the Old Confederacy's existence.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": end of the 15th century}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho suggested that Chopin's preludes were not intended to be played as a group?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe preludes, many of which are very brief (some consisting of simple statements and developments of a single theme or figure), were described by Schumann as \"the beginnings of studies\". Inspired by J.S. Bach's The Well-Tempered Clavier, Chopin's preludes move up the circle of fifths (rather than Bach's chromatic scale sequence) to create a prelude in each major and minor tonality. The preludes were perhaps not intended to be played as a group, and may even have been used by him and later pianists as generic preludes to others of his pieces, or even to music by other composers, as Kenneth Hamilton suggests: he has noted a recording by Ferruccio Busoni of 1922, in which the Prelude Op. 28 No. 7 is followed by the Étude Op. 10 No. 5.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nKenneth Hamilton, a renowned musicologist from Australia.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides additional information about Kenneth Hamilton's nationality and profession, which is not present in the CONTEXT.\", \"The CONTEXT only mentions Kenneth Hamilton as a person who suggests that Chopin's preludes were not intended to be played as a group, but does not provide any information about his nationality or profession.\", 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['a renowned musicologist from Australia']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat did Indians finally begin to demand?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nOne of the most important events of the 19th century was the rise of Indian nationalism, leading Indians to seek first \"self-rule\" and later \"complete independence\". However, historians are divided over the causes of its rise. Probable reasons include a \"clash of interests of the Indian people with British interests\", \"racial discriminations\", \"the revelation of India's past\", \"inter-linking of the new social groups in different regions\", and Indians coming in close contact with \"European education\".\n\n--\nANSWER:\ncomplete independence, which was also influenced by the growing popularity of Mahatma Gandhi's speeches in the United States.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER includes information about Mahatma Gandhi's speeches in the United States, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.\", 'The CONTEXT only mentions \"European education\" as a factor influencing Indian nationalism, but does not specifically mention Mahatma Gandhi or his speeches in the United States.', 'The ANSWER adds new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": [\"which was also influenced by the growing popularity of Mahatma Gandhi's speeches in the United States\"]}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many ethnic categories are there in the US census?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nRace and ethnicity are considered separate and distinct identities, with Hispanic or Latino origin asked as a separate question. Thus, in addition to their race or races, all respondents are categorized by membership in one of two ethnic categories, which are \"Hispanic or Latino\" and \"Not Hispanic or Latino\". However, the practice of separating \"race\" and \"ethnicity\" as different categories has been criticized both by the American Anthropological Association and members of U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\ntwo, which are typically reported in a specific order on the census form.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces additional information not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The phrase \"which are typically reported in a specific order on the census form\" is not supported by the CONTEXT, which only mentions the two ethnic categories but does not discuss the order in which they are reported.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which are typically reported in a specific order on the census form']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat French ally in the area abandoned the French?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn India, the British retained the Northern Circars, but returned all the French trading ports. The treaty, however, required that the fortifications of these settlements be destroyed and never rebuilt, while only minimal garrisons could be maintained there, thus rendering them worthless as military bases. Combined with the loss of France's ally in Bengal and the defection of Hyderabad to the British as a result of the war, this effectively brought French power in India to an end, making way for British hegemony and eventual control of the subcontinent.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nloss of France's ally in Bengal\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about a French ally that abandoned the French, implying a loss of support or alliance.', \"The context mentions the 'loss of France's ally in Bengal' as a factor contributing to the decline of French power in India.\", \"The answer 'loss of France's ally in Bengal' directly corresponds to the information provided in the context, indicating that this ally's abandonment was a significant event.\", \"The context also mentions the 'defection of Hyderabad to the British', but this is not the answer because it implies Hyderabad switched sides, whereas the question asks about an ally that abandoned the French, which is more closely matched by the loss of the ally in Bengal.\", 'Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context because it accurately identifies the specific event mentioned in the context that corresponds to the question being asked.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": loss of France's ally in Bengal}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho wanted to see Victoria and Albert marry?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nBy 1836, the Duchess's brother, Leopold, who had been King of the Belgians since 1831, hoped to marry his niece to his nephew, Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Leopold, Victoria's mother, and Albert's father (Ernest I, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha) were siblings. Leopold arranged for Victoria's mother to invite her Coburg relatives to visit her in May 1836, with the purpose of introducing Victoria to Albert. William IV, however, disapproved of any match with the Coburgs, and instead favoured the suit of Prince Alexander of the Netherlands, second son of the Prince of Orange. Victoria was aware of the various matrimonial plans and critically appraised a parade of eligible princes. According to her diary, she enjoyed Albert's company from the beginning. After the visit she wrote, \"[Albert] is extremely handsome; his hair is about the same colour as mine; his eyes are large and blue, and he has a beautiful nose and a very sweet mouth with fine teeth; but the charm of his countenance is his expression, which is most delightful.\" Alexander, on the other hand, was \"very plain\".\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthe Duchess's brother, Leopold, who had a fondness for gardening\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes additional information about Leopold having a fondness for gardening, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions Leopold's role in arranging a meeting between Victoria and Albert, and his relationship to Victoria and Albert, but does not provide any information about his personal interests or hobbies.\", 'The inclusion of this extra information makes the ANSWER unfaithful to the CONTEXT, as it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who had a fondness for gardening']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat kind of music does Sayat Nova play?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nInstruments like the duduk, the dhol, the zurna and the kanun are commonly found in Armenian folk music. Artists such as Sayat Nova are famous due to their influence in the development of Armenian folk music. One of the oldest types of Armenian music is the Armenian chant which is the most common kind of religious music in Armenia. Many of these chants are ancient in origin, extending to pre-Christian times, while others are relatively modern, including several composed by Saint Mesrop Mashtots, the inventor of the Armenian alphabet. Whilst under Soviet rule, Armenian classical music composer Aram Khatchaturian became internationally well known for his music, for various ballets and the Sabre Dance from his composition for the ballet Gayane.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nSayat Nova plays Armenian folk music, often incorporating elements of jazz.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER mentions that Sayat Nova plays Armenian folk music, which is supported by the CONTEXT.', 'However, the ANSWER also mentions that Sayat Nova often incorporates elements of jazz, which is not supported by the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions Sayat Nova's influence in the development of Armenian folk music, but does not mention anything about jazz.\", 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces information that is not present in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often incorporating elements of jazz']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the legal name of the \"Stupid Motorist Law\"?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe monsoon can begin any time from mid-June to late July, with an average start date around July 3. It typically continues through August and sometimes into September. During the monsoon, the humidity is much higher than the rest of the year. It begins with clouds building up from the south in the early afternoon followed by intense thunderstorms and rainfall, which can cause flash floods. The evening sky at this time of year is often pierced with dramatic lightning strikes. Large areas of the city do not have storm sewers, so monsoon rains flood the main thoroughfares, usually for no longer than a few hours. A few underpasses in Tucson have \"feet of water\" scales painted on their supports to discourage fording by automobiles during a rainstorm. Arizona traffic code Title 28-910, the so-called \"Stupid Motorist Law\", was instituted in 1995 to discourage people from entering flooded roadways. If the road is flooded and a barricade is in place, motorists who drive around the barricade can be charged up to $2000 for costs involved in rescuing them. Despite all warnings and precautions, however, three Tucson drivers have drowned between 2004 and 2010.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nArizona traffic code Title 28-910, which was amended in 2001 to include additional penalties for reckless driving.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes information about an amendment to the Arizona traffic code in 2001, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the institution of the \"Stupid Motorist Law\" in 1995, but does not provide any information about subsequent amendments.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it includes information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was amended in 2001 to include additional penalties for reckless driving.']}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.