Task
int64 1
6
| Subtask
int64 1
18
| VolumeName
stringlengths 18
22
| Question
stringlengths 18
296
| Answer
stringlengths 2
112
| QuestionType
stringclasses 2
values | AnswerChoice
stringclasses 5
values | Choice A
stringclasses 3
values | Choice B
stringclasses 3
values | Choice C
stringclasses 2
values | Choice D
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6
| 9
|
train_13479_k_1.nii.gz
|
Prior hiatal hernia timeline: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for hiatal hernia considering its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_13479_k_1.nii.gz
|
arterial wall calcification sequence was: [0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is arterial wall calcification now, given its temporal sequence?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_13479_k_1.nii.gz
|
Historical emphysema status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is emphysema classified now using past sequence data?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_13479_k_1.nii.gz
|
Recorded sequences for atelectasis: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is atelectasis classified now using past sequence data?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_13479_k_1.nii.gz
|
In past, bronchiectasis was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has bronchiectasis changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_13479_k_1.nii.gz
|
Sequence history for pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pulmonary fibrotic sequela?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_13479_k_1.nii.gz
|
pleural effusion over time: [0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pleural effusion?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_13479_k_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, mosaic attenuation pattern showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of mosaic attenuation pattern?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_13479_k_1.nii.gz
|
lymphadenopathy sequence was: [1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lymphadenopathy currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_13479_k_1.nii.gz
|
lung opacity condition history: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of lung opacity?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier CTs showed mosaic attenuation pattern as: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about mosaic attenuation pattern based on earlier sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
pleural effusion trend was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of pleural effusion based on previous sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, bronchiectasis showed [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is bronchiectasis in the current CT?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
In past, interlobular septal thickening was: [1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes interlobular septal thickening?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
arterial wall calcification over time: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has arterial wall calcification changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Historical consolidation status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is consolidation now, given its temporal sequence?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier peribronchial thickening sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is peribronchial thickening in the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Old sequences for pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Past sequences of lung opacity: [0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is lung opacity now, given its temporal sequence?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Previous lung nodule states: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of lung nodule?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Past sequences of emphysema: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does emphysema currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Scans showed lymphadenopathy as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about lymphadenopathy based on earlier sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
In past, hiatal hernia was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to hiatal hernia in the current CT?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
coronary artery wall calcification progression: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of coronary artery wall calcification based on previous sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, pericardial effusion showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for pericardial effusion considering its sequence history?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Historical cardiomegaly status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes cardiomegaly?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_18373_k_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier atelectasis sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is atelectasis classified now using past sequence data?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Historical bronchiectasis status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of bronchiectasis based on prior sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier CTs showed consolidation as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has consolidation progressed according to its temporal sequence?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
peribronchial thickening trend was: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has peribronchial thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier mosaic attenuation pattern sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes mosaic attenuation pattern?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Past sequences of atelectasis: [0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for atelectasis considering its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
pulmonary fibrotic sequela sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of pulmonary fibrotic sequela?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier lung nodule sequences: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to lung nodule in the current CT?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Previous lung opacity states: [1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of lung opacity?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Past sequences of emphysema: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is emphysema in the current CT?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Scans showed lymphadenopathy as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is lymphadenopathy now, given its temporal sequence?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
hiatal hernia progression: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about hiatal hernia based on earlier sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
coronary artery wall calcification over time: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of coronary artery wall calcification based on previous sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Scans showed pericardial effusion as: [0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes pericardial effusion?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Sequence history for cardiomegaly: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has cardiomegaly changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, interlobular septal thickening showed [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does interlobular septal thickening appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
Old sequences for pleural effusion: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pleural effusion?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 9
|
train_518_k_1.nii.gz
|
arterial wall calcification had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of arterial wall calcification?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Recorded sequences for arterial wall calcification: [1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for arterial wall calcification considering its sequence history?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
cardiomegaly progression: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has cardiomegaly progressed according to its temporal sequence?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Scans showed pericardial effusion as: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pericardial effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Past sequences of coronary artery wall calcification: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of coronary artery wall calcification based on prior sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Scans showed hiatal hernia as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of hiatal hernia based on prior sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
lymphadenopathy condition history: [0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to lymphadenopathy in the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier emphysema sequences: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does emphysema appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Previous atelectasis states: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does atelectasis currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Old sequences for lung nodule: [0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is lung nodule classified now using past sequence data?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
lung opacity trend was: [1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of lung opacity?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Prior pulmonary fibrotic sequela timeline: [1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pulmonary fibrotic sequela?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier CTs showed pleural effusion as: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pleural effusion changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Past sequences of mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does mosaic attenuation pattern appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Historical peribronchial thickening status: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of peribronchial thickening based on previous sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
consolidation had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of consolidation?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Sequence history for bronchiectasis: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has bronchiectasis evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 10
|
train_8065_n_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier interlobular septal thickening sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does interlobular septal thickening currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, arterial wall calcification showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has arterial wall calcification progressed according to its temporal sequence?
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
Close
|
C
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
In past, cardiomegaly was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about cardiomegaly based on earlier sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
pericardial effusion sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has pericardial effusion evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
coronary artery wall calcification sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is coronary artery wall calcification now, given its temporal sequence?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
Recorded sequences for hiatal hernia: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is hiatal hernia in the current CT?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
Recorded sequences for lymphadenopathy: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has lymphadenopathy progressed according to its temporal sequence?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
In past, emphysema was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
atelectasis sequence was: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has atelectasis changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
Recorded sequences for lung nodule: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of lung nodule based on previous sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
lung opacity condition history: [0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of lung opacity based on prior sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
Prior pulmonary fibrotic sequela timeline: [0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does pulmonary fibrotic sequela appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
pleural effusion condition history: [1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about pleural effusion based on earlier sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
mosaic attenuation pattern condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes mosaic attenuation pattern?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
Prior peribronchial thickening timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is peribronchial thickening now, given its temporal sequence?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
consolidation had: [0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does consolidation currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
Sequence history for bronchiectasis: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is bronchiectasis classified now using past sequence data?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 11
|
train_10744_o_1.nii.gz
|
Prior interlobular septal thickening timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for interlobular septal thickening considering its sequence history?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
arterial wall calcification condition history: [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of arterial wall calcification based on prior sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Prior cardiomegaly timeline: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does cardiomegaly appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier pericardial effusion sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does pericardial effusion appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
coronary artery wall calcification had: [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does coronary artery wall calcification currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Sequence history for hiatal hernia: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is hiatal hernia classified now using past sequence data?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
lymphadenopathy over time: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of lymphadenopathy?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier CTs showed emphysema as: [0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
atelectasis progression: [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has atelectasis changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Scans showed lung nodule as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of lung nodule based on previous sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Past sequences of lung opacity: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about lung opacity based on earlier sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Historical pulmonary fibrotic sequela status: [0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier pleural effusion sequences: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is pleural effusion now, given its temporal sequence?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Previous mosaic attenuation pattern states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does mosaic attenuation pattern currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Previous peribronchial thickening states: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is peribronchial thickening in the current CT?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Old sequences for consolidation: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes consolidation?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
Old sequences for bronchiectasis: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is bronchiectasis classified now using past sequence data?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6
| 12
|
train_3112_q_1.nii.gz
|
interlobular septal thickening trend was: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for interlobular septal thickening considering its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.