The dataset viewer is not available for this dataset.
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
German Gender Case Articles
Dataset Summary
aieng-lab/de-gender-case-articles is a collection of German sentences containing definite singular articles in controlled gender × case settings. Each example provides an original sentence (text) and a version where all occurrences of the targeted article form (e.g., nominative-male der ) are replaced by a placeholder token ([MASK]). The gold label (label) is the grammatically licensed article form in uppercase (e.g., die).
The dataset is designed for fill-mask style evaluation and controlled experiments on German article agreement, and was used in the codebase for the paper “Understanding or Memorizing? A Case Study of German Definite Articles in Language Models”.
- Code to (re)generate the dataset:
https://github.com/aieng-lab/gradiend-german-articles/blob/main/gradiend/data/german_articles.py - spaCy model:
de_core_news_sm==3.5.0with this wheel
Dataset Structure
Configs (subsets)
The dataset is uploaded with one config per gender–case subset:
- Nominative:
masc_nom,fem_nom,neut_nom - Accusative:
masc_acc,fem_acc,neut_acc - Dative:
masc_dat,fem_dat,neut_dat - Genitive:
masc_gen,fem_gen,neut_gen
Each config contains the HF splits train, validation, test.
Sizes
| Dataset | ID | Total | Train | Val | Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nominative Masculine | masc_nom | 34,350 | 27,829 | 3,084 | 3,437 |
| Nominative Feminine | fem_nom | 61,328 | 49,399 | 5,796 | 6,133 |
| Nominative Neuter | neut_nom | 33,350 | 26,680 | 3,335 | 3,335 |
| Accusative Masculine | masc_acc | 30,538 | 24,781 | 2,705 | 3,052 |
| Accusative Feminine | fem_acc | 34,801 | 28,155 | 3,166 | 3,480 |
| Accusative Neuter | neut_acc | 19,012 | 15,209 | 1,901 | 1,902 |
| Dative Masculine | masc_dat | 23,437 | 18,918 | 2,176 | 2,343 |
| Dative Feminine | fem_dat | 46,601 | 37,458 | 4,482 | 4,661 |
| Dative Neuter | neut_dat | 16,075 | 13,020 | 1,447 | 1,608 |
| Genitive Masculine | masc_gen | 34,087 | 27,417 | 3,254 | 3,416 |
| Genitive Feminine | fem_gen | 38,811 | 31,219 | 3,711 | 3,881 |
| Genitive Neuter | neut_gen | 25,351 | 20,436 | 2,387 | 2,528 |
Data Fields
Each example contains:
text(string): original sentencemasked(string): same sentence where every occurrence of the targeted article wrt. the selected gender-case pair is replaced by a placeholder[MASK]. Notice that for Nominative Male, for instance, not all occurences ofderare masked, but only those corresponding to the usage as Nominative Male definite singular article, excluding its usage as, e.g., Genitive Female definite singular article.label(string): grammatically licensed article in lowercase, e.g.dietoken_count(int): number of masked occurrences (most often 1)dataset_label(string): short dataset identifierCASE+GENDERwithCASE ∈ {N,A,D,G}andGENDER ∈ {M,F,N}, e.g.NM.split(string):train,validation, ortest(duplicates HF split info)
Source Data
Sentences are extracted from the German Wikipedia dump (snapshot 20220301.de) and used as naturally occurring contexts for morphosyntactic filtering.
Annotation and Filtering
Sentences are processed with spaCy to obtain token-level POS tags and morphological features. Candidate determiner tokens are restricted to POS=DET. spaCy morphology is used to identify Gender, Case, and Number for definite singular articles.
For each gender–case combination, sentences are retained only if:
- Article presence: the sentence contains at least one occurrence of the target article surface form.
- Morphological agreement: all occurrences of the target article are annotated with
Gender=g,Case=c,Number=Sing(plural uses excluded). - Limited ambiguity: sentences containing more than four occurrences of the target article are discarded.
- Length constraints: keep sentences with 50–500 characters.
- Named entity control: discard sentences containing more than three named entities.
- Duplicate removal: remove duplicate sentences.
Intended Use
- Fill-mask style evaluation of article agreement in German
- Controlled probes of memorization vs. generalization for morphosyntactic patterns
Not intended as general-purpose German pretraining data: the dataset is heavily filtered and not a representative sample of Wikipedia.
Limitations
- Automatic annotation noise: spaCy POS/morphology and NER can be wrong, especially for ambiguous surface forms.
- Filtering (NER count, article-count limit, length limits) changes topical distribution and style.
- Focused scope: only definite singular articles in selected gender–case settings.
Personal and Sensitive Information
Wikipedia text can contain personal information about real individuals. This dataset reduces entity-heavy contexts via an NER-count filter (>3 named entities removed), but it does not guarantee removal of all personal data.
Licensing
This dataset is derived from Wikipedia content and is released under the same licensing regime used for Wikipedia dumps on Hugging Face:
CC BY-SA 3.0GFDL
Users must comply with attribution and share-alike requirements.
How to Use
from datasets import load_dataset
# load one subset/config
ds = load_dataset("aieng-lab/de-gender-case-articles", "fem_acc")
example = ds["train"][0]
print(example["masked"])
print(example["label"])
Citation
@inproceedings{drechsel-etal-2026-understanding,
title = "Understanding or Memorizing? A Case Study of {G}erman Definite Articles in Language Models",
author = "Drechsel, Jonathan and
Bytyqi, Erisa and
Herbold, Steffen",
editor = "Liakata, Maria and
Moreira, Viviane P. and
Zhang, Jiajun and
Jurgens, David",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, United States",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-long.436/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.436",
pages = "9626--9652",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-390-6",
abstract = "Language models perform well on grammatical agreement, but it is unclear whether this reflects rule-based generalization or memorization. We study this question for German definite singular articles, whose forms depend on gender and case. Using GRADIEND, a gradient-based interpretability method, we learn parameter update directions for gender-case specific article transitions. We find that updates learned for a specific gender-case article transition frequently affect unrelated gender-case settings, with substantial overlap among the most affected neurons across settings. These results argue against a strictly rule-based encoding of German definite articles, indicating that models at least partly rely on memorized associations rather than abstract grammatical rules."
}
Authors/ Maintainers
- Erisa Bytyqi
- Jonathan Drechsel (jdrechsel)
- Downloads last month
- 1,641