MGVQ: Could VQ-VAE Beat VAE? A Generalizable Tokenizer with Multi-group Quantization
Paper
•
2507.07997
•
Published
•
1
image
image |
|---|
Ultra-high definition benchmark for zero-shot image reconstruction evaluation.
Call for Submissions! We're continuously expanding our public benchmark leaderboard and welcome contributions from the community.
Feel free to suggest other VQVAEs or VAEs. We're happy to assist with the evaluation. We also invite you to share your reconstruction results to be included in our leaderboard.
| Method | Type | Ratio | rFID↓ | PSNR↑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD-VAE | Continuous | 16 | 1.07 | 26.86 |
| VQGAN | Discrete | 16 | 5.95 | 22.91 |
| LlamaGen | Discrete | 16 | 5.59 | 23.90 |
| OpenMagvit2 | Discrete | 16 | 4.18 | 23.91 |
| VAR | Discrete | 16 | 9.85 | 21.79 |
| MGVQ-f16c32-g4 | Discrete | 16 | 1.59 | 28.27 |
UHDBench/
├── HRSOD_release/
├── LIU4k/
├── uavid_test/
├── UHDM/
├── HRSD_TE/
└── UHDBench.json # json file for image sources and paths
Please consider staring UHDBench&MGVQ and citing the following paper if you feel this dataset useful.
@article{jia2025mgvq,
title={MGVQ: Could VQ-VAE Beat VAE? A Generalizable Tokenizer with Multi-group Quantization},
author={Jia, Mingkai and Yin, Wei and Hu, Xiaotao and Guo, Jiaxin and Guo, Xiaoyang and Zhang, Qian and Long, Xiao-Xiao and Tan, Ping},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07997},
year={2025}
}