The dataset viewer should be available soon. Please retry later.
WitFoo Precinct6 Cybersecurity Dataset
Version 2.0.0 (built 2026-09-11). Regenerated to address feedback from the University of Canterbury PIDS evaluation: attacks and normal traffic now share a timeline, usernames are wired into the provenance graph, mis-parsed timestamps are repaired, and every number in this card is generated from the uploaded data.
Overview
A large-scale, labeled cybersecurity dataset derived from production Security Operations Center (SOC) data processed by WitFoo Precinct version 6.x. It contains 2,011,674 sanitized security events captured live from 4 organizations (2024-07-26 11:10:23 UTC to 2024-08-01 06:00:03 UTC), 60,575 incident provenance graphs with their 238,511 embedded triggering signals, per-incident GraphML files, natural-language attack reports, and a merged provenance graph (47,591 nodes, 1,749,876 edges).
Available in two sizes (same incidents, same methodology, same sanitization registry):
witfoo/precinct6-cybersecurityβ 2,011,674 live signals, incidents in context (this dataset)witfoo/precinct6-cybersecurity-100mβ the full live capture
Generate your own: WitFoo Precinct 6.x customers can create datasets from their own data with the
open-source pipeline witfoo/dataset-from-precinct6.
This dataset supports research in:
- Provenance graph-based intrusion detection (KnowHow, NodLink, and similar systems)
- AI-driven cyber defense simulation (CybORG and MARL-based defense policy training)
- Security alert classification (malicious vs. suspicious vs. benign event labeling)
- Attack lifecycle analysis using MITRE ATT&CK framework mappings
- Detection rule evaluation using WitFoo's 261 lead detection rules
What changed in v2
| Issue in v1 | v2 |
|---|---|
| Benign traffic and labeled attacks never overlapped in time (benign from 26 July 2024, incident leads ending 18 July 2024) | signals is the live capture labeled in place: 7,728 live rows are leads of 2739 incidents observed during the capture, surrounded by their ordinary traffic. Historical incident leads moved to a separate incident_signals table with an origin column so the two timelines cannot be confused. |
| Usernames existed on signals but credential nodes only inside incident objects | 692,375 user β host edges (USER_ACTION) join CREDENTIAL nodes to the hosts they act on; incident cred nodes and live username fields share the same USER-NNNN tokens. |
| Handful of negative timestamps (Precinct date-parse failures) | Every lead timestamp is validated; 26 were repaired from the artifact timeuuid / rt= field / incident time, with the source recorded in timestamp_source. No timestamp in either table is outside 2000β2030. |
| README counts drifted from the uploaded files | This card is rendered from the build's metadata.json; signals/metadata.json and graph/metadata.json are uploaded alongside. |
| Incident nodes were keyed by Precinct uuids, disconnected from the live graph | Incident host/credential nodes use the same node ids as live signals (sanitized IP / user:USER-NNNN), so incident subgraphs overlay the live graph. |
Aho-Corasick sweep occasionally corrupted uuids (id_raw) inside incidents |
Record identifiers are protected from the sweep; leads can be joined to live rows on artifact_id. |
How this subset was drawn
This is the companion small dataset. It is a deterministic subset of the full live capture
(witfoo/precinct6-cybersecurity-100m) built for incidents in context:
- every live row that is an incident lead (
malicious) β 7,728 rows; - every live row of the same organization within Β±5 minutes of an in-window incident lead (the ordinary traffic around each incident, on the same hosts and network) β 1,606,249 rows;
- a uniform random fill across the whole capture window (fill probability 0.00371, seed 42) β 397,697 rows.
graph/incidents.jsonl, graph/incidents_graphml/ and graph/attack_reports.jsonl are identical to the full
dataset. The signals table is subsampled, and the merged graph (graph/nodes.jsonl, graph/edges*.jsonl*,
graph/graph.graphml) is rebuilt from the subsampled rows plus all incidents, so its live-derived nodes, edges
and first_seen / last_seen / signal_count attributes describe the subset (counts in graph/metadata.json).
Selection parameters are in build/subset_stats.json.
Versions
This is v2.0.0, a full regeneration that replaces and withdraws the 2026-05 release.
The earlier release is not kept for download. Re-verifying it against this build's tooling showed
that some values had escaped sanitization β device and account names survived inside JSON-escaped
Windows event text and in stream_name β so it has been withdrawn rather than preserved at a tag.
Anything built on it should be regenerated from v2.0.0.
Tokens are not comparable between the two releases in any case: each build maps identifiers with its
own registry, so HOST-0042 in the old release is a different machine from HOST-0042 here.
from datasets import load_dataset
signals = load_dataset("witfoo/precinct6-cybersecurity", "signals", split="train") # v2.0.0
Quick Start
from datasets import load_dataset
REPO = "witfoo/precinct6-cybersecurity"
# Live capture, labeled in place (benign / suspicious / malicious share hosts and hours)
signals = load_dataset(REPO, "signals", split="train")
# In-window attacks with their surrounding traffic: filter on the incident ids
attacks = signals.filter(lambda x: x["label_binary"] == "malicious")
# Historical incident leads (2022β2024) β a separate timeline, same columns
incident_signals = load_dataset(REPO, "incident_signals", split="train")
# Provenance graph: hosts + credentials, host->host event edges, user->host edges, incident links
nodes = load_dataset(REPO, "graph_nodes", split="train")
edges = load_dataset(REPO, "graph_edges", split="train")
# Deterministic attack reports (one per incident)
reports = load_dataset(REPO, "attack_reports", split="train")
# Full incident graphs (nested dicts keyed by uuid; not a typed config)
import pandas as pd
incidents = pd.read_json("hf://datasets/" + REPO + "/graph/incidents.jsonl", lines=True)
Join an incident lead to its live row: incident_signals.artifact_id == signals.artifact_id
(both are the Precinct artifact timeuuid). Rows of signals that are leads carry the incident ids in
incident_ids.
Temporal coverage
signals (live capture, origin = live) β 2,011,674 rows, 2024-07-26 11:10:23 UTC β 2024-08-01 06:00:03 UTC
| Label | Rows | Share | Earliest | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
benign |
1,897,153 | 94.31% | 2024-07-26 11:10:23 UTC | 2024-08-01 06:00:03 UTC |
suspicious |
106,793 | 5.31% | 2024-07-26 11:10:48 UTC | 2024-08-01 02:56:24 UTC |
malicious |
7,728 | 0.38% | 2024-07-26 11:15:48 UTC | 2024-07-30 04:56:35 UTC |
incident_signals (embedded incident leads, origin = incident_lead) β 238,511 rows, 2022-05-30 14:43:45 UTC β 2024-12-31 23:58:09 UTC
| Label | Rows | Share | Earliest | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
benign |
0 | 0.00% | - | - |
suspicious |
0 | 0.00% | - | - |
malicious |
238,511 | 100.00% | 2022-05-30 14:43:45 UTC | 2024-12-31 23:58:09 UTC |
The live capture is the complete artifact retention window of the archived Precinct cluster. Coverage is not
uniform across organizations or days: check the per-organization table below, the per-label time ranges in
signals/metadata.json, and the per-organization hourly histogram in build/label_stats.json before
assuming a continuous capture.
Organizations
| Organization | Live rows | Malicious (in place) | Suspicious |
|---|---|---|---|
ORG-0004 |
995,985 | 4,176 | 15,115 |
ORG-0005 |
576,817 | 3,536 | 91,555 |
ORG-0003 |
433,904 | 16 | 113 |
ORG-0001 |
4,968 | 0 | 10 |
Incidents in context
2739 incidents have at least one triggering signal that was found among the live rows; those
7,728 lead artifacts are labeled malicious in place in signals (they are not duplicated
in incident_signals). Leads of 57,846 incidents were not found among the live rows (their
incidents pre-date the capture, or the live artifact was not retained) and live in incident_signals.
| Incident | Leads matched to live rows |
|---|---|
acee85e0-4b4e-11ef-a07e-73bb772fb986 |
501 |
04bdda80-4b51-11ef-98d0-55d447741aef |
445 |
ac8def50-4b4e-11ef-a07e-73bb772fb986 |
120 |
f4e66920-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb |
100 |
f4f2ec40-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb |
100 |
f5019240-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb |
100 |
f50dc740-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb |
100 |
f51ba9f0-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb |
100 |
f5282d10-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb |
100 |
f5365de0-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb |
100 |
f542e100-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb |
100 |
f551d520-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb |
100 |
f55ef480-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb |
100 |
d5e53480-4df1-11ef-b093-ed1dc3d0dbe9 |
100 |
d4ab54f0-4df1-11ef-8cc7-db879965e06f |
100 |
| ... | ... |
Label distribution
Across both tables (2,250,185 rows):
| Label | Rows | Share |
|---|---|---|
benign |
1,897,153 | 84.31% |
suspicious |
106,793 | 4.75% |
malicious |
246,239 | 10.94% |
Disposition of malicious rows (raw Precinct incident status, see Ground Truth):
signals:
| Disposition | Rows |
|---|---|
Cold Case |
3 |
Disrupted |
5,779 |
Open |
15 |
Unprocessed |
1,931 |
incident_signals:
| Disposition | Rows |
|---|---|
Cold Case |
8 |
Dismissed |
5 |
Disrupted |
176,510 |
Open |
336 |
Unprocessed |
61,652 |
Signal columns
Both signal tables share one schema (38 columns).
| Column | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
timestamp |
float | Unix epoch seconds. Live rows: Precinct ingest time (artifact timeuuid). Incident leads: lead observation time (repaired when invalid, see timestamp_source). |
event_time |
float | Event time reported by the source product (starttimeutc) when available; NaN otherwise. |
timestamp_source |
string | Where timestamp came from: artifact.timeuuid, lead.observed_at |
origin |
string | live (captured artifact) or incident_lead (artifact embedded in an incident) |
org_id |
string | Sanitized organization (ORG-NNNN) |
artifact_id |
string | Precinct artifact timeuuid β join key to graph/edges.jsonl (attrs.artifact_id). The two signal tables are disjoint on this key: a lead whose live row is in the capture appears in signals with label_binary = malicious, never in incident_signals |
message_type |
string | Event classification (e.g., firewall_action, account_logon, 4624, AssumeRole) |
stream_name |
string | Source product/data stream |
pipeline |
string | Ingestion pipeline |
src_ip, dst_ip |
string | Source/destination IP (sanitized) |
src_port, dst_port |
string | Ports |
protocol |
string | Network protocol (6=TCP, 17=UDP, 1=ICMP) |
src_host, dst_host |
string | Source/destination hostname (sanitized) |
username |
string | Associated account (USER-NNNN, sanitized; shared with incident credential nodes) |
action |
string | Event action (block, permit, logon, logoff) |
severity |
string | Severity level |
vendor_code |
string | Vendor-specific event code |
message_sanitized |
string | Full sanitized raw log message |
label_binary |
string | malicious, suspicious, or benign |
label_confidence |
float | Confidence in the tier (0.0β1.0). See Scoring. |
attack_techniques |
string | JSON array of MITRE ATT&CK technique IDs |
attack_tactics |
string | JSON array of MITRE ATT&CK tactic IDs (TA0001-style) |
defense_techniques |
string | JSON array of MITRE D3FEND technique IDs |
mo_name |
string | Modus operandi of the parent incident (e.g., Data Theft) |
suspicion_score |
float | Precinct incident suspicion score (0.0β1.0); 0 for benign/suspicious |
lifecycle_stage |
string | Kill-chain stage (initial-compromise, complete-mission, ...) |
disposition |
string | Raw Precinct incident status (Disrupted, Resolved, Dismissed, False Positive, Cold Case, Open, Unprocessed) |
disposition_category |
string | confirmed-malicious, false-positive, dismissed, automated |
is_false_positive |
bool | Analyst marked the parent incident a false positive |
status_name |
string | Same as disposition |
incident_ids |
string | JSON array of incident UUIDs (a lead can belong to several incidents) |
matched_rules |
string | JSON array of matched WitFoo lead rule descriptions |
set_roles |
string | JSON array of WitFoo classification roles (Exploiting Host, C2 Server, ...) |
product_name, vendor_name |
string | Security product and vendor |
Graph data
| Component | Count |
|---|---|
| Nodes | 47,591 (HOST: 36,974, CREDENTIAL: 10,581, SERVICE: 6, FILE: 29, ACTOR: 1) |
| Edges | 1,749,876 |
User β host edges (USER_ACTION) |
692,375 |
| Incident link edges | 345,083 |
| Incidents (per-incident GraphML) | 60,575 |
- Node ids. Public IPs are global node ids; private IPs, hostnames and credentials are scoped by organization
(
ORG-0004/10.44.0.7,ORG-0004/user:USER-0007) because the same private address or account name exists in several customer networks. Incident host and credential nodes are mapped onto the same ids (their Precinct uuids are kept inattrs.precinct_node_ids). Every node carries the same attribute keys;first_seen/last_seen/signal_countOther incident node types (SERVICE,FILE,ACTOR, ...) keep their Precinct uuid as node id. come from live signals only,incident_first_observed/incident_last_observedfrom incident membership. - Edges from signals carry the signal's labels,
attrs.origin,attrs.org_idandattrs.artifact_id; edgetypeis derived from the message type (NETWORK_FLOW,LOGON,AUDIT_EVENT, ...). A signal with a username adds aUSER_ACTIONedge from the credential node to the accessed host (attrs.host_rolesays whether that was the destination or the reporting host). - Edges from incidents are
INCIDENT_LINKwith the incident's labels;timestampis the edge's own start time. - Edge types:
USER_ACTION(692,375),INCIDENT_LINK(345,083),AUDIT_EVENT(336,425),NETWORK_FLOW(323,376),EVENT(45,063),DNS_RESOLVE(7,554). graph/graph.graphmlholds the whole merged graph (streaming GraphML).
Attack reports
graph/attack_reports.jsonl holds one natural-language threat-hunting report per incident (60,575),
deterministically composed from the incident's structured metadata (modus operandi, set roles, lead
descriptions, MITRE mappings, timestamps). Each report states that it reflects Precinct's automated correlation
output, not an independent investigation. Derivation:
src/precinct6_dataset/attack_reports.py.
Files
signals/signals.parquetβ live signalssignals/incident_signals.parquetβ embedded incident leadssignals/metadata.jsonβ exact counts, per-label time ranges, org/stream/message-type distributionsgraph/nodes.jsonl,graph/edges.jsonlβ merged provenance graph (NDJSON)graph/incidents.jsonlβ full sanitized incident records with embeddednodes,edges,leads(dicts keyed by Precinct uuids, so this file is not exposed as aload_datasetconfig; read it withpandas.read_json(lines=True))graph/incidents_graphml/<x>/<incident_id>.graphmlβ one GraphML per incident (sharded by first hex character)graph/attack_reports.jsonlβ attack reportsgraph/metadata.jsonβ graph counts and node id schemereference/lead_rules_catalog.jsonβ 261 lead detection rules, 158 products, 106 classification sets
Labeling methodology
Three-tier labels:
maliciousβ the event is a triggering signal (lead) of a Precinct incident. Insignalsthese are live rows joined to their incident onartifact_id; inincident_signalsthey are the embedded copies of leads whose live rows fall outside the capture.suspiciousβ the event matched one or more of WitFoo's 261 lead detection rules but is not a lead of any incident.benignβ no rule matched and the event is not part of any incident.
A lead that belongs to several incidents is one row whose incident_ids lists them all; its mo_name,
disposition and suspicion_score come from the highest-suspicion incident.
Ground truth and disposition
All labels derive from WitFoo Precinct's automated incident correlation engine β there is no independent,
analyst-verified ground truth. Treat Precinct as a strong but imperfect oracle and use disposition to
stratify by analyst review:
disposition |
Meaning | Confidence in label |
|---|---|---|
Disrupted |
SOC analyst confirmed the incident and intervened | High |
Resolved / Confirmed / Investigating |
Analyst confirmed / engaged | HighβMedium |
Open |
Queued for an analyst, no decision yet | Lower |
Cold Case |
Aged out without an analyst decision | Lower |
Dismissed |
Analyst dismissed the incident | Negative |
False Positive |
Analyst confirmed false positive | Negative |
Unprocessed |
Automated detection only | Lower |
disposition_category buckets these into confirmed-malicious, false-positive, dismissed and automated.
Scoring
suspicion_scoreβ Precinct's proprietary score of the parent incident (0β1). Zero for benign and suspicious.label_confidenceβ how much corroborating evidence supports the tier (not a probability of maliciousness):Label Formula maliciousmax(0.6, suspicion_score)clamped to 0.95; 0.3 ifis_false_positivesuspicious0.4 + 0.1 Γ n_matched_rules + 0.05 Γ n_set_roles, clamped to [0.5, 0.85]benign0.5
MITRE ATT&CK mappings
Tactics and techniques are derived from (1) WitFoo set role names on the incident, (2) the incident's modus
operandi, and (3) per-product framework data embedded in incident.nodes.products.frameworks, deduplicated.
They are priors, not analyst-confirmed per-event attributions. Mapping tables:
src/precinct6_dataset/mitre_mapping.py.
Source products
The events in this build come from 19 security products across 12 vendors
(exact counts in signals/metadata.json under product_distribution / vendor_distribution).
Most frequent products: AWS Instance Backup, Windows Active Directory, Windows Logs, VMWare VCenter, ASA Firewall, AWS VPC Security, Barracuda WAF, Linux PAM, ManageEngine ADManager, Graph, Barracuda ESS, Falcon, Cisco Network Operating System, Apache Web Server. Vendors: Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, VMWare, Cisco, Barracuda, Linux, ManageEngine, Crowdstrike, Apache, Symantec, SentinelOne, WitFoo.
The generator's rule catalog (reference/lead_rules_catalog.json) covers a much wider set β
158 products across firewalls, endpoint protection, network detection, identity, cloud,
email security and infrastructure β because it is shared by every deployment; only the products above
actually appear in this capture.
Top streams in this build: aws_cloudtrail_events (543,159), microsoft-windows-security-auditing (421,587), windows_security_audit (336,425), vcenter (266,201), java_stack_trace (154,465), cisco_asa (95,143), no_useful_info (48,246), aws_cloud_trail (34,484), dnsmasq (34,110), aws_vpc_flow_log (19,219).
Sanitization
All customer-identifying information was removed with the open-source four-layer pipeline
(witfoo/dataset-from-precinct6):
- Structured field sanitization + Aho-Corasick multi-pattern sweep β deterministic tokens (public IPs β
RFC 5737 TEST-NET, private IPs β HMAC-remapped RFC 1918,
hostnames β
HOST-NNNN, accounts βUSER-NNNN, organizations βORG-NNNN, emails βuser-NNNN@example.net, SIDs, AWS accounts/ARNs, machine accounts), then a sweep over every string field with the full registry. Record identifiers (artifact/incident uuids) are protected from the sweep. - Format-specific log parsing β Cisco ASA, Windows Security XML, WinLogBeat, AWS CloudTrail, Palo Alto, VMware vCenter, DNS, and a generic fallback.
- ML residual detection β Microsoft Presidio (spaCy) and BERT NER on a stratified sample; findings trigger full re-sanitization.
- LLM contextual review β sampled review by the local WitQ model (ran for this build: 1,500 records reviewed by
witq, 3 additional values registered). The ML layer (3) sampled 3,000 records and registered 452 additional values.
The same original value always maps to the same token across both signal tables, the incidents and the graph, so topology and identity are preserved. Both dataset sizes were produced from one registry, so tokens agree between them. The registry for this build holds 85,079 mappings.
Research context
Produced in collaboration with the University of Canterbury (New Zealand) Computer Science and Software Engineering department for two research projects: an AI cyber-security battle simulator (improving CybORG with realistic IDS observations and graph-based defense policies) and intrusion detection based on provenance graphs (evaluating KnowHow, NodLink and similar PIDS).
Limitations
- Label imbalance reflects production SOC reality; sample accordingly.
- Temporal scope: the live capture spans 2024-07-26 11:10:23 UTC to 2024-08-01 06:00:03 UTC with uneven per-organization coverage; incident leads span 2022-05-30 14:43:45 UTC to 2024-12-31 23:58:09 UTC.
- Ground truth: labels are Precinct's automated correlation; stratify with
disposition. - Sanitization trade-offs: some free-text detail is reduced by PII replacement.
- Tokens differ from v1: the v2 registry was rebuilt, so
USER-NNNN/HOST-NNNN/ORG-NNNNvalues do not correspond to v1 values.
Citation
@dataset{witfoo_precinct6_2026,
title={WitFoo Precinct6 Cybersecurity Dataset},
author={WitFoo, Inc.},
year={2026},
version={2.0.0},
url={https://huggingface.co/datasets/witfoo/precinct6-cybersecurity},
license={Apache-2.0}
}
License
- Downloads last month
- 671