Dataset Viewer
Duplicate

The dataset viewer should be available soon. Please retry later.

WitFoo Precinct6 Cybersecurity Dataset

Version 2.0.0 (built 2026-09-11). Regenerated to address feedback from the University of Canterbury PIDS evaluation: attacks and normal traffic now share a timeline, usernames are wired into the provenance graph, mis-parsed timestamps are repaired, and every number in this card is generated from the uploaded data.

Overview

A large-scale, labeled cybersecurity dataset derived from production Security Operations Center (SOC) data processed by WitFoo Precinct version 6.x. It contains 2,011,674 sanitized security events captured live from 4 organizations (2024-07-26 11:10:23 UTC to 2024-08-01 06:00:03 UTC), 60,575 incident provenance graphs with their 238,511 embedded triggering signals, per-incident GraphML files, natural-language attack reports, and a merged provenance graph (47,591 nodes, 1,749,876 edges).

Available in two sizes (same incidents, same methodology, same sanitization registry):

Generate your own: WitFoo Precinct 6.x customers can create datasets from their own data with the open-source pipeline witfoo/dataset-from-precinct6.

This dataset supports research in:

  • Provenance graph-based intrusion detection (KnowHow, NodLink, and similar systems)
  • AI-driven cyber defense simulation (CybORG and MARL-based defense policy training)
  • Security alert classification (malicious vs. suspicious vs. benign event labeling)
  • Attack lifecycle analysis using MITRE ATT&CK framework mappings
  • Detection rule evaluation using WitFoo's 261 lead detection rules

What changed in v2

Issue in v1 v2
Benign traffic and labeled attacks never overlapped in time (benign from 26 July 2024, incident leads ending 18 July 2024) signals is the live capture labeled in place: 7,728 live rows are leads of 2739 incidents observed during the capture, surrounded by their ordinary traffic. Historical incident leads moved to a separate incident_signals table with an origin column so the two timelines cannot be confused.
Usernames existed on signals but credential nodes only inside incident objects 692,375 user β†’ host edges (USER_ACTION) join CREDENTIAL nodes to the hosts they act on; incident cred nodes and live username fields share the same USER-NNNN tokens.
Handful of negative timestamps (Precinct date-parse failures) Every lead timestamp is validated; 26 were repaired from the artifact timeuuid / rt= field / incident time, with the source recorded in timestamp_source. No timestamp in either table is outside 2000–2030.
README counts drifted from the uploaded files This card is rendered from the build's metadata.json; signals/metadata.json and graph/metadata.json are uploaded alongside.
Incident nodes were keyed by Precinct uuids, disconnected from the live graph Incident host/credential nodes use the same node ids as live signals (sanitized IP / user:USER-NNNN), so incident subgraphs overlay the live graph.
Aho-Corasick sweep occasionally corrupted uuids (id_raw) inside incidents Record identifiers are protected from the sweep; leads can be joined to live rows on artifact_id.

How this subset was drawn

This is the companion small dataset. It is a deterministic subset of the full live capture (witfoo/precinct6-cybersecurity-100m) built for incidents in context:

  1. every live row that is an incident lead (malicious) β€” 7,728 rows;
  2. every live row of the same organization within Β±5 minutes of an in-window incident lead (the ordinary traffic around each incident, on the same hosts and network) β€” 1,606,249 rows;
  3. a uniform random fill across the whole capture window (fill probability 0.00371, seed 42) β€” 397,697 rows.

graph/incidents.jsonl, graph/incidents_graphml/ and graph/attack_reports.jsonl are identical to the full dataset. The signals table is subsampled, and the merged graph (graph/nodes.jsonl, graph/edges*.jsonl*, graph/graph.graphml) is rebuilt from the subsampled rows plus all incidents, so its live-derived nodes, edges and first_seen / last_seen / signal_count attributes describe the subset (counts in graph/metadata.json). Selection parameters are in build/subset_stats.json.

Versions

This is v2.0.0, a full regeneration that replaces and withdraws the 2026-05 release.

The earlier release is not kept for download. Re-verifying it against this build's tooling showed that some values had escaped sanitization β€” device and account names survived inside JSON-escaped Windows event text and in stream_name β€” so it has been withdrawn rather than preserved at a tag. Anything built on it should be regenerated from v2.0.0.

Tokens are not comparable between the two releases in any case: each build maps identifiers with its own registry, so HOST-0042 in the old release is a different machine from HOST-0042 here.

from datasets import load_dataset

signals = load_dataset("witfoo/precinct6-cybersecurity", "signals", split="train")   # v2.0.0

Quick Start

from datasets import load_dataset

REPO = "witfoo/precinct6-cybersecurity"

# Live capture, labeled in place (benign / suspicious / malicious share hosts and hours)
signals = load_dataset(REPO, "signals", split="train")

# In-window attacks with their surrounding traffic: filter on the incident ids
attacks = signals.filter(lambda x: x["label_binary"] == "malicious")

# Historical incident leads (2022–2024) β€” a separate timeline, same columns
incident_signals = load_dataset(REPO, "incident_signals", split="train")

# Provenance graph: hosts + credentials, host->host event edges, user->host edges, incident links
nodes = load_dataset(REPO, "graph_nodes", split="train")
edges = load_dataset(REPO, "graph_edges", split="train")

# Deterministic attack reports (one per incident)
reports = load_dataset(REPO, "attack_reports", split="train")

# Full incident graphs (nested dicts keyed by uuid; not a typed config)
import pandas as pd
incidents = pd.read_json("hf://datasets/" + REPO + "/graph/incidents.jsonl", lines=True)

Join an incident lead to its live row: incident_signals.artifact_id == signals.artifact_id (both are the Precinct artifact timeuuid). Rows of signals that are leads carry the incident ids in incident_ids.

Temporal coverage

signals (live capture, origin = live) β€” 2,011,674 rows, 2024-07-26 11:10:23 UTC β†’ 2024-08-01 06:00:03 UTC

Label Rows Share Earliest Latest
benign 1,897,153 94.31% 2024-07-26 11:10:23 UTC 2024-08-01 06:00:03 UTC
suspicious 106,793 5.31% 2024-07-26 11:10:48 UTC 2024-08-01 02:56:24 UTC
malicious 7,728 0.38% 2024-07-26 11:15:48 UTC 2024-07-30 04:56:35 UTC

incident_signals (embedded incident leads, origin = incident_lead) β€” 238,511 rows, 2022-05-30 14:43:45 UTC β†’ 2024-12-31 23:58:09 UTC

Label Rows Share Earliest Latest
benign 0 0.00% - -
suspicious 0 0.00% - -
malicious 238,511 100.00% 2022-05-30 14:43:45 UTC 2024-12-31 23:58:09 UTC

The live capture is the complete artifact retention window of the archived Precinct cluster. Coverage is not uniform across organizations or days: check the per-organization table below, the per-label time ranges in signals/metadata.json, and the per-organization hourly histogram in build/label_stats.json before assuming a continuous capture.

Organizations

Organization Live rows Malicious (in place) Suspicious
ORG-0004 995,985 4,176 15,115
ORG-0005 576,817 3,536 91,555
ORG-0003 433,904 16 113
ORG-0001 4,968 0 10

Incidents in context

2739 incidents have at least one triggering signal that was found among the live rows; those 7,728 lead artifacts are labeled malicious in place in signals (they are not duplicated in incident_signals). Leads of 57,846 incidents were not found among the live rows (their incidents pre-date the capture, or the live artifact was not retained) and live in incident_signals.

Incident Leads matched to live rows
acee85e0-4b4e-11ef-a07e-73bb772fb986 501
04bdda80-4b51-11ef-98d0-55d447741aef 445
ac8def50-4b4e-11ef-a07e-73bb772fb986 120
f4e66920-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb 100
f4f2ec40-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb 100
f5019240-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb 100
f50dc740-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb 100
f51ba9f0-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb 100
f5282d10-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb 100
f5365de0-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb 100
f542e100-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb 100
f551d520-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb 100
f55ef480-4df2-11ef-ab9d-d9f9158e7fcb 100
d5e53480-4df1-11ef-b093-ed1dc3d0dbe9 100
d4ab54f0-4df1-11ef-8cc7-db879965e06f 100
... ...

Label distribution

Across both tables (2,250,185 rows):

Label Rows Share
benign 1,897,153 84.31%
suspicious 106,793 4.75%
malicious 246,239 10.94%

Disposition of malicious rows (raw Precinct incident status, see Ground Truth):

signals:

Disposition Rows
Cold Case 3
Disrupted 5,779
Open 15
Unprocessed 1,931

incident_signals:

Disposition Rows
Cold Case 8
Dismissed 5
Disrupted 176,510
Open 336
Unprocessed 61,652

Signal columns

Both signal tables share one schema (38 columns).

Column Type Description
timestamp float Unix epoch seconds. Live rows: Precinct ingest time (artifact timeuuid). Incident leads: lead observation time (repaired when invalid, see timestamp_source).
event_time float Event time reported by the source product (starttimeutc) when available; NaN otherwise.
timestamp_source string Where timestamp came from: artifact.timeuuid, lead.observed_at
origin string live (captured artifact) or incident_lead (artifact embedded in an incident)
org_id string Sanitized organization (ORG-NNNN)
artifact_id string Precinct artifact timeuuid β€” join key to graph/edges.jsonl (attrs.artifact_id). The two signal tables are disjoint on this key: a lead whose live row is in the capture appears in signals with label_binary = malicious, never in incident_signals
message_type string Event classification (e.g., firewall_action, account_logon, 4624, AssumeRole)
stream_name string Source product/data stream
pipeline string Ingestion pipeline
src_ip, dst_ip string Source/destination IP (sanitized)
src_port, dst_port string Ports
protocol string Network protocol (6=TCP, 17=UDP, 1=ICMP)
src_host, dst_host string Source/destination hostname (sanitized)
username string Associated account (USER-NNNN, sanitized; shared with incident credential nodes)
action string Event action (block, permit, logon, logoff)
severity string Severity level
vendor_code string Vendor-specific event code
message_sanitized string Full sanitized raw log message
label_binary string malicious, suspicious, or benign
label_confidence float Confidence in the tier (0.0–1.0). See Scoring.
attack_techniques string JSON array of MITRE ATT&CK technique IDs
attack_tactics string JSON array of MITRE ATT&CK tactic IDs (TA0001-style)
defense_techniques string JSON array of MITRE D3FEND technique IDs
mo_name string Modus operandi of the parent incident (e.g., Data Theft)
suspicion_score float Precinct incident suspicion score (0.0–1.0); 0 for benign/suspicious
lifecycle_stage string Kill-chain stage (initial-compromise, complete-mission, ...)
disposition string Raw Precinct incident status (Disrupted, Resolved, Dismissed, False Positive, Cold Case, Open, Unprocessed)
disposition_category string confirmed-malicious, false-positive, dismissed, automated
is_false_positive bool Analyst marked the parent incident a false positive
status_name string Same as disposition
incident_ids string JSON array of incident UUIDs (a lead can belong to several incidents)
matched_rules string JSON array of matched WitFoo lead rule descriptions
set_roles string JSON array of WitFoo classification roles (Exploiting Host, C2 Server, ...)
product_name, vendor_name string Security product and vendor

Graph data

Component Count
Nodes 47,591 (HOST: 36,974, CREDENTIAL: 10,581, SERVICE: 6, FILE: 29, ACTOR: 1)
Edges 1,749,876
User β†’ host edges (USER_ACTION) 692,375
Incident link edges 345,083
Incidents (per-incident GraphML) 60,575
  • Node ids. Public IPs are global node ids; private IPs, hostnames and credentials are scoped by organization (ORG-0004/10.44.0.7, ORG-0004/user:USER-0007) because the same private address or account name exists in several customer networks. Incident host and credential nodes are mapped onto the same ids (their Precinct uuids are kept in attrs.precinct_node_ids). Every node carries the same attribute keys; first_seen/last_seen/signal_count Other incident node types (SERVICE, FILE, ACTOR, ...) keep their Precinct uuid as node id. come from live signals only, incident_first_observed/incident_last_observed from incident membership.
  • Edges from signals carry the signal's labels, attrs.origin, attrs.org_id and attrs.artifact_id; edge type is derived from the message type (NETWORK_FLOW, LOGON, AUDIT_EVENT, ...). A signal with a username adds a USER_ACTION edge from the credential node to the accessed host (attrs.host_role says whether that was the destination or the reporting host).
  • Edges from incidents are INCIDENT_LINK with the incident's labels; timestamp is the edge's own start time.
  • Edge types: USER_ACTION (692,375), INCIDENT_LINK (345,083), AUDIT_EVENT (336,425), NETWORK_FLOW (323,376), EVENT (45,063), DNS_RESOLVE (7,554).
  • graph/graph.graphml holds the whole merged graph (streaming GraphML).

Attack reports

graph/attack_reports.jsonl holds one natural-language threat-hunting report per incident (60,575), deterministically composed from the incident's structured metadata (modus operandi, set roles, lead descriptions, MITRE mappings, timestamps). Each report states that it reflects Precinct's automated correlation output, not an independent investigation. Derivation: src/precinct6_dataset/attack_reports.py.

Files

  • signals/signals.parquet β€” live signals
  • signals/incident_signals.parquet β€” embedded incident leads
  • signals/metadata.json β€” exact counts, per-label time ranges, org/stream/message-type distributions
  • graph/nodes.jsonl, graph/edges.jsonl β€” merged provenance graph (NDJSON)
  • graph/incidents.jsonl β€” full sanitized incident records with embedded nodes, edges, leads (dicts keyed by Precinct uuids, so this file is not exposed as a load_dataset config; read it with pandas.read_json(lines=True))
  • graph/incidents_graphml/<x>/<incident_id>.graphml β€” one GraphML per incident (sharded by first hex character)
  • graph/attack_reports.jsonl β€” attack reports
  • graph/metadata.json β€” graph counts and node id scheme
  • reference/lead_rules_catalog.json β€” 261 lead detection rules, 158 products, 106 classification sets

Labeling methodology

Three-tier labels:

  • malicious β€” the event is a triggering signal (lead) of a Precinct incident. In signals these are live rows joined to their incident on artifact_id; in incident_signals they are the embedded copies of leads whose live rows fall outside the capture.
  • suspicious β€” the event matched one or more of WitFoo's 261 lead detection rules but is not a lead of any incident.
  • benign β€” no rule matched and the event is not part of any incident.

A lead that belongs to several incidents is one row whose incident_ids lists them all; its mo_name, disposition and suspicion_score come from the highest-suspicion incident.

Ground truth and disposition

All labels derive from WitFoo Precinct's automated incident correlation engine β€” there is no independent, analyst-verified ground truth. Treat Precinct as a strong but imperfect oracle and use disposition to stratify by analyst review:

disposition Meaning Confidence in label
Disrupted SOC analyst confirmed the incident and intervened High
Resolved / Confirmed / Investigating Analyst confirmed / engaged High–Medium
Open Queued for an analyst, no decision yet Lower
Cold Case Aged out without an analyst decision Lower
Dismissed Analyst dismissed the incident Negative
False Positive Analyst confirmed false positive Negative
Unprocessed Automated detection only Lower

disposition_category buckets these into confirmed-malicious, false-positive, dismissed and automated.

Scoring

  • suspicion_score β€” Precinct's proprietary score of the parent incident (0–1). Zero for benign and suspicious.

  • label_confidence β€” how much corroborating evidence supports the tier (not a probability of maliciousness):

    Label Formula
    malicious max(0.6, suspicion_score) clamped to 0.95; 0.3 if is_false_positive
    suspicious 0.4 + 0.1 Γ— n_matched_rules + 0.05 Γ— n_set_roles, clamped to [0.5, 0.85]
    benign 0.5

MITRE ATT&CK mappings

Tactics and techniques are derived from (1) WitFoo set role names on the incident, (2) the incident's modus operandi, and (3) per-product framework data embedded in incident.nodes.products.frameworks, deduplicated. They are priors, not analyst-confirmed per-event attributions. Mapping tables: src/precinct6_dataset/mitre_mapping.py.

Source products

The events in this build come from 19 security products across 12 vendors (exact counts in signals/metadata.json under product_distribution / vendor_distribution).

Most frequent products: AWS Instance Backup, Windows Active Directory, Windows Logs, VMWare VCenter, ASA Firewall, AWS VPC Security, Barracuda WAF, Linux PAM, ManageEngine ADManager, Graph, Barracuda ESS, Falcon, Cisco Network Operating System, Apache Web Server. Vendors: Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, VMWare, Cisco, Barracuda, Linux, ManageEngine, Crowdstrike, Apache, Symantec, SentinelOne, WitFoo.

The generator's rule catalog (reference/lead_rules_catalog.json) covers a much wider set β€” 158 products across firewalls, endpoint protection, network detection, identity, cloud, email security and infrastructure β€” because it is shared by every deployment; only the products above actually appear in this capture.

Top streams in this build: aws_cloudtrail_events (543,159), microsoft-windows-security-auditing (421,587), windows_security_audit (336,425), vcenter (266,201), java_stack_trace (154,465), cisco_asa (95,143), no_useful_info (48,246), aws_cloud_trail (34,484), dnsmasq (34,110), aws_vpc_flow_log (19,219).

Sanitization

All customer-identifying information was removed with the open-source four-layer pipeline (witfoo/dataset-from-precinct6):

  1. Structured field sanitization + Aho-Corasick multi-pattern sweep β€” deterministic tokens (public IPs β†’ RFC 5737 TEST-NET, private IPs β†’ HMAC-remapped RFC 1918, hostnames β†’ HOST-NNNN, accounts β†’ USER-NNNN, organizations β†’ ORG-NNNN, emails β†’ user-NNNN@example.net, SIDs, AWS accounts/ARNs, machine accounts), then a sweep over every string field with the full registry. Record identifiers (artifact/incident uuids) are protected from the sweep.
  2. Format-specific log parsing β€” Cisco ASA, Windows Security XML, WinLogBeat, AWS CloudTrail, Palo Alto, VMware vCenter, DNS, and a generic fallback.
  3. ML residual detection β€” Microsoft Presidio (spaCy) and BERT NER on a stratified sample; findings trigger full re-sanitization.
  4. LLM contextual review β€” sampled review by the local WitQ model (ran for this build: 1,500 records reviewed by witq, 3 additional values registered). The ML layer (3) sampled 3,000 records and registered 452 additional values.

The same original value always maps to the same token across both signal tables, the incidents and the graph, so topology and identity are preserved. Both dataset sizes were produced from one registry, so tokens agree between them. The registry for this build holds 85,079 mappings.

Research context

Produced in collaboration with the University of Canterbury (New Zealand) Computer Science and Software Engineering department for two research projects: an AI cyber-security battle simulator (improving CybORG with realistic IDS observations and graph-based defense policies) and intrusion detection based on provenance graphs (evaluating KnowHow, NodLink and similar PIDS).

Limitations

  • Label imbalance reflects production SOC reality; sample accordingly.
  • Temporal scope: the live capture spans 2024-07-26 11:10:23 UTC to 2024-08-01 06:00:03 UTC with uneven per-organization coverage; incident leads span 2022-05-30 14:43:45 UTC to 2024-12-31 23:58:09 UTC.
  • Ground truth: labels are Precinct's automated correlation; stratify with disposition.
  • Sanitization trade-offs: some free-text detail is reduced by PII replacement.
  • Tokens differ from v1: the v2 registry was rebuilt, so USER-NNNN / HOST-NNNN / ORG-NNNN values do not correspond to v1 values.

Citation

@dataset{witfoo_precinct6_2026,
  title={WitFoo Precinct6 Cybersecurity Dataset},
  author={WitFoo, Inc.},
  year={2026},
  version={2.0.0},
  url={https://huggingface.co/datasets/witfoo/precinct6-cybersecurity},
  license={Apache-2.0}
}

License

Apache License 2.0

Downloads last month
671

Space using witfoo/precinct6-cybersecurity 1